DCSI Meeting A-F Accountability January 2017€¦ · The ratings in this report are for informational purposes to meet a legislative requirement. No inferences about district or campus

2017 ©Region One Education Service Center

DCSI Meeting A-F Accountability

January 2017Office of School Improvement, Accountability and Compliance


Agenda

• A-F Accountability Overview

• Domain V



House Bill 2804Timeline

Date Activity

December 1, 2016 TEA adopted a set of indicators for A–F ratings.

December 16, 2016TEA released data tables, domain methodologies, and domain targets to districts

via TEASE.

December 30, 2016

TEA released 2015–16 A–F Ratings report to the legislature, showing “the ratings

that each district and campus would have received for Domains 1–IV for the 2015–

16 school year had the A–F rating system been in place.”

December 30, 2016 TEA released 2015–16 A–F ratings included in the report to districts via TEASE.

By January 6, 2017 TEA posts the 2015–16 A–F Ratings report to its public website.


House Bill 2804Timeline

Date Activity

January 10, 2017 The 85th Texas Legislature convenes for 140 days.The regular session ends May 29, 2017.

Late January 2017Additional calculation tables, reports, and training materials provided to ESCs and districts to the extent possible

By Summer 2017Districts and campuses report to TEA which three indicators will be used for Domain V

and the criteria that will be used to measure performance in those indicators.

By Spring 2018Districts and campuses assign themselves a rating for each of the three indicators used for

Domain V and an overall rating of A, B, C, D, or F for Domain V.

By August 15, 2018TEA assigns each district and campus an overall rating of A, B, C, D, or F and a rating for

each domain beginning with the 2017–18 school year.


House Bill 28042015-2016 A-F Ratings Report

The December 30, 2016, report

shows the ratings that each district and campus would have received for Domains 1–IV for the 2015–16 school year had the A–F rating system been in place.

is a 494-page PDF that includes ratings for districts and campuses and correlations between each domain rating and student demographics by district and campus type.

includes three pages of 32 important caveats.



The December 30, 2016, report is not

actual district and campus ratings that carry with them the possibility of interventions or sanctions.

an inference on district and campus performance in the 2015–16 school year.

a predictor of future district or campus performance or ratings.



Executive Summary (six pages)

House Bill 2804

Requirement for 2015–16 Ratings Report

Process for Determining Domain Indicators and Construction

A–F Overview

A–F Accountability System (five pages)

Domain I: Student Achievement

Domain II: Student Progress

Domain III: Closing Performance Gaps

Domain IV: Postsecondary Readiness

Additional Indicators Considered

Timeline for Implementation


2015-2016 A-F Ratings to 85th Texas Legislature


Overview


Guiding Principals of A-F Accountability

Should not be built on a forced distribution so that some percentage of campuses must get an A or F

Should be based on criteria meaningful to ensure our students are prepared for success

Should be mathematically possible that all campuses can achieve an A rating

Ratings should be based on stable criteria


A-F Caveats Per TEA

ca·ve·atˈkavēˌat,ˈkävēˌät/

a warning or proviso of specific stipulations, conditions, or limitations.

The ratings in this report are for informational purposes to

meet a legislative requirement. No inferences about district or

campus performance in the 2015-2016 school year should be

drawn from these ratings, and these ratings should not be

considered predictors of future district or campus

performance ratings. Campus and district ratings for 2017-

2018 will use different data and different indicators than were

used for this report.

For a complete list of A-F caveats, please refer to pgs. 11-14 of

A-F Report


A-F Caveats Per TEA



The provisional ratings in this report are not

accompanied by the full system of explanatory

materials, data tables, and data downloads that will

accompany the A-F ratings assigned in 2017-2018.

Pg. 12


A-F Report


A-F Caveats Per TEA



The final methodology to determine the overall rating

label, including the process to convert the domain

outcomes to a scale that can be weighted across the

five domains, will be developed with further

stakeholder input and is expected to be adopted in the

Texas Administrative Code in Spring 2018.

Pg. 13


A-F Report


A-F Caveats Per TEA



The data used is the same for Index 2 in

2016.

Pg. 13


A-F Report


A-F Caveats Per TEA



These ratings only include students who are

economically disadvantaged; it does not

specifically include any racial or ethnic

group.

Pg. 13


A-F Report


A-f List of Indicators I-III


Domains I-IV Targets




• Level III

• Level III

Domain I

Advanced Level III

Final Level II

Level II Satisfactory Standard

Performance Index FrameworkIndex 1 Level of Performance 2016-2017

Five Domain FrameworkDomain I Levels of Performance 2017-2018

Index 1





Domain I

Advanced Level III

Final Level II




Domain I

Advanced Level III

Final Level II




Domain I

Masters

Meets

Approaches

100

100

100

1 P

oin

t fo

r Ea

ch P

erc

en

tage

of

Test

Re

sult

s



100

100

100


Domain I: Student Achievement Sample

100

100

100


Domain I: Student Achievement Sample

100

100

100


Domain II: Student Progress

100

100

100

Last Year’s STAAR Scale

Score

This Year’s STAAR Scale

Score

STAAR Progress Measure

ELL Progress Measure


Domain II: Student Groups Evaluated

100

100

100

All Student

Two Or More Races

HispanicAfrican American White American Indian

PacificIslander

Asian Special Education ELL

Minimum Size Requirement = 25 for Subgroups

10 for All Students Group


Domain II: Calculation





100

100

100


Domain II: Targets

100

100

100



Domain III

Advanced Level III

Final Level II


Economically Disadvantaged

Group Only



Domain III

Advanced Level III

Final Level II



Group Only



Domain III

Masters

Meets

Satisfactory

100

100

100

1 P

oin

t fo

r Ea

ch P

erce

nta

ge o

f Te

st

Res

ult

sEc

on

om

ica

lly D

isa

dva

nta

ged

Gro

up

O

nly


Group Only



100

100

100Economically

Disadvantaged Group Only



100

100

100Economically


Calculate the predicted Domain I Score usingy = mx+b

(For appropriate District or campus Type)



100


Group Only

Y is the predicted Domain I Score

X is the percentage of students who areEconomically disadvantaged



100Economically


Sample ElementaryY = -.100992x + 47.31887Economically Disadvantaged: 4.8%Y = -.100992(4.8) + 47.31887Y = 46.8Actual Domain I Score (for Eco. Dis) is 39Actual – Predicted = Domain III Score39 – 46.8 = -7.8Campus has earned a Domain III Letter Grade of D


Domain III: Targets

100

100

100


Domain II: Targets

100

100

100


Domain IV: Post Secondary Readiness Elementary Schools

100

100

100


Chronic Absenteeism Rate Methodology

100

100

Non-Mobile Students

At or above 83% Membership

Non-Mobile Students

Below 83% Membership

Absent at least 10% days Eligible to

attend

Not absent at Least 10% days

Eligible to attend

Absent at least 10% days Eligible to

attend

ChronicAbsenteeism

IndicatorScore


Domain IV: Post Secondary Readiness Middle Schools

100

100

100


Domain IV: Post Secondary Readiness High Schools and K-12

100

100

100

*Annual 9-12 Dropout Rate (if longitudinal graduation rate is not available)



100

100

100

2015-2016 2016-2017

Class of 2015 Longitudinal graduates who graduate under:- Recommended High School Plan

(RHSP)- Distinguished Achievement Plan

(DAP)- Foundation High School Plan with

Endorsement (FHSP-E)- Foundation High School Plan with

Distinguished Level of Achievement (FHSP-DLA)

Class of 2017 longitudinal graduates who graduate under one of the following plans:- Foundation High School Plan with

Endorsement (FHSP-E)- Foundation High School Plan with

Distinguished Level of Achievement (FHSP-DLA)



100

100

100

2015-2016 2016-2017

2014-2015 annual graduates who do at least one of the following:- Complete CTE-Coherent Sequence

of courses- Complete one or more AP/IB

courses- Complete 12 hours of earned

postsecondary credit - Achieve TSI benchmark on TSIA,

SAT, or ACT

2016-2017 annual graduates who do at least one of the following- Complete CTE-Coherent Sequence

of courses/earn industry (nationally recognized) certification

- Perform at or above criterion score on one or more AP/IB examinations

- Complete 12 hours or more of earned postsecondary credit

- Achieve TSI benchmark on the TSIA, SAT, or ACT

- Enlist in the US Armed Forces

REACHING NEW HORIZONS

© 2016 Region One Education Service Center

Post

Sec

on

dar

y R

ead

ines

s

STAAR Postsecondary Readiness

Final Level II Performance

Graduation Rate or Dropout Rate

Graduation Diploma Plan

Post Secondary Component

Performance Index FrameworkIndex 4

Post

Sec

on

dar

y R

ead

ines

s

Attendance/Chronic Absenteeism Rate; Annual

Dropout Rate

Graduation Rate

Graduation Diploma Plan

Post Secondary Component

Five Domain FrameworkDomain IV

Postsecondary Readiness at a Glance

2015-2016 2017-2018



Past Considerations



Domain IV: Postsecondary Readiness High School and District Preliminary Work in Progress Reports

January 1 Reports

Complete CTE Coherent Sequence

Complete one or more AP/IB

Complete 12 hours or more of earned postsecondary credits

Achieve TSI benchmark on TSIA, SAT, or ACT

2017-2018Complete CTE coherent sequence of

courses/earn industry (nationally recognized) certification

Perform at or above criterion score on one or more AP/IB examinations

Complete 12 hours or more of earned postsecondary credit

Enlist in the U.S. armed forces

Achieve TSI benchmark on TSIA, SAT, or ACT


Domain IV: Calculation

100

100

100


School District Evaluation of PerformanceCommunity and Student Engagement (C.a.S.E)

HB 5 2015-2016 TAA Guidance on C.a.S.E


School District Evaluation of PerformanceCommunity and Student Engagement; Compliance

Statutory Reporting and Policy Requirement for district and each campus

Texas Education Code, §39.0545

Category and Programs Fine arts Wellness and physical

education Community and

parental involvement 21st century workforce

development Second language

acquisition program Digital learning

environment Dropout prevention

strategies Educational programs

for gifted and talented

District Requirements

District Assigns and Reports Ratings District Reports Compliance

Exemplary Recognized Acceptable Unacceptable

0 – No (Not in Compliance)1 – Yes (In Compliance)

Overall Performance

No later than August 8 of each year, the district shall report each performance rating to the agency and make the performance ratings publicly available as provided by the commissioner rule.


Community and Student Engagement; Compliance Tool

http://www.esc1.net//site/Default.aspx?PageID=2100

https://prodev.esc1.net/surveys/LandingPage.aspx

HB5 Page

HB5 Tool

http://www.esc1.net/site/Default.aspx?PageID=2100


https://prodev.esc1.net/surveys/LandingPage.aspx


Complete Steps 1, 2 & 3

1

2

3

http://www.esc1.net//site/Default.aspx?PageID=2100



Automatic Confirmation and email will be sent


House Bill 2804

Student & Community

Domain V

Extended Educational Program

Opportunities

A, B, C, D, or F

Transition to Domain V

Indicator 2015-2016 (used for January 2, 2017

Report)

2017-2018

Community and Student Engagement (CaSE)

Not Applicable Three as chosen,locally determined, and reported for each district and campus. All three CaSEindicators as well as the overall Domain V indicator will be rated A, B, C, D, F


Domain V Timeline

Districts and Campuses report to

TEA which 3 indicators will be used and the

criteria used to measure performance

in the indicators

Districts and campuses assign

themselves a rating for each of the 3 indicators

used for Domain V and an overall

rating of A,B,C,D, or F

Summer 2017 Spring 2018

Districts Report

Domain V Ratings

Summer 2018




HB5: the Transition to Domain VC.a.S.E. Year Submission

Dates

Deadline for

Districts to

Post Ratings

HB 5

2013-2014 First Submission:

No later than June 26

Resubmission:

No later than July 24

August 82014-2015 First Submission:


Resubmission:


2015-2016 First Submission:


Resubmission:


August 72016-2017 First Submission:


Resubmission:


TEA Required to

Report Local

Performance on TEA

Website

Categories Self-Rated Ratings Region One Rating

Tool

No later

than October 1

Fine arts Wellness and

physical education Community and

parental involvement

The 21st Century Workforce Development program

The second language acquisition program

The digital learning environment

Dropout prevention strategies

Educational programs for gifted and talented students

Exemplary

Recognized

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Collaboratively

created tool with

Region One and

districts, with

indicators



Transition to Domain VC.a.S.E. Year Submission

Dates

TSDS Data Element Deadline for

Districts to

Submit Ratings

Districts and Campuses still

Required to Rate all CaSe

Indicators

HB5

and

HB 2804

(Domain V)

2017-2018

First

Submission:

No later than

June 22

Resubmission:

No later than

July 20

First-Case-Choice-Code

Indicates the first choice of three

of the eight community and

student engagement indicators

Second-Case-Choice-Code

Indicates the second choice of the

three of the eight community and


Third-Case-Choice-Code

Indicates the third choice of the

three of the eight community and


CaSE Ratings-Criteria-Link

Indicates the internet website link

to the CaSE ratings criteria that are

used by the LEA and campuses to

determine the ratings for the LEA

and campuses

Final Due Date

May 4, 2018

• Fine arts• Wellness and physical

education• Community and parental

involvement• The 21st Century Workforce

Development program• The second language

acquisition program• The digital learning

environment• Dropout prevention strategies• Educational programs for gifted

and talented students




Contacts

Division of Instructional SupportOffice of School Improvement, Accountability and Compliance

Dr. Belinda S. Gorena, Administrator956 984-6173

[email protected]

Ruben Degollado, Coordinator956 984-6185

[email protected]

Benjamin Macias, Evaluation and Assessment Specialist956 984-6234

[email protected]

Documents

DCSI Meeting A-F Accountability January 2017€¦ · The ratings in this report are for informational purposes to meet a legislative requirement. No inferences about district or campus