Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education

Data Slides for Children & Students

with IEPs in 2010

Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services

Children & Students w/IEPs

Age Groups

3

Children with IEPs Ages 3-51997 – 2010

Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

4

Students With IEPs Ages 6-211997 – 2010


Students With IEPs Ages 22-261996 - 2010


Students with IEPs Ages 22 – 26 in 2010


Number of Students with IEPs Ages 13 - 21in 2010


Students with IEPs Ages 6 - 12in 2010


Students with IEPs Ages 3 - 5in 2010


10

Students with IEPs by Age Groups in 2010

Age Groups


Identification Rates

By Eligibility

Special Education Eligibility1997 - 2010


Identification Rates By Eligibilityin 2010


Identification Rates By Eligibilityin 2010

SLD SLI CI OHI EI ASD ECDD PI SXI HI VI TBI D/B


Trends in Disability Categories

1992-2010

16

Cognitive Impairment1992 - 2010


17

Emotional Impairment1992 - 2010


18

Physical and Other Health Impairments1992 - 2010


19

Early Childhood Developmental Delay 1992 - 2010


20

Severe Multiple Impairment1992 - 2010


21

Visual Impairment1992 - 2010


22

Hearing Impairment1992 - 2010


23

Speech and Language Impairment1992 - 2010


24

Physical (PI) & Other Health Impairments (OHI) 1991 - 2010


25

Specific Learning Disability1992 - 2010

79,978

83,730 89

,940 96

,552

96,546

94,564

77,096

77,761

85,49392

,635

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Year

Stu

den

t C

ou

nt


26

Specific Learning Disability EligibilityAge Groups 2002 - 2010


27

Autism Spectrum Disorder1992 - 2010


Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age - 2008






Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age – 2008, 2009 and 2010 Compared

Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age - 2008 through 2010 Compared


Race/Ethnicity for Students w/IEPs

Race/Ethnicity Ages 3-26in 2010


Gender for Students with IEPs

35

Gender by Age Groups in 2010


36

Gender Distribution of Students with IEPs Ages 3-26 in 2010


Educational Environments for

Students with IEPs

38

Educational EnvironmentStudents with IEPs Ages 3 – 5 in 2010


39

Educational EnvironmentStudents with IEPs Ages 6-12 in 2010


40



41



Educational EnvironmentStudents with IEPs Ages 22 – 26 in 2010


State Performance Plan Indicator Performance

Graduation* for Students with IEPsTarget is 80%

*Calculations using Cohort Four-Year Graduation Rate Methodology and using OSEP’s Prescribed One Year Data Lag


Dropout* for Students with IEPsTarget is <10%

*Calculation using Consolidated State Performance ReportEvent Dropout Rate Methodology, and using OSEP’s Prescribed One Year Data Lag.


Indicator 3A: AYP percent = [(# of districts with a disability subgroup that meets the State’s minimum “n” size that meet the State’s AYP targets for the disability subgroup) divided by the (total # of districts that have a disability subgroup that meets the State’s minimum “n” size)] times 100.

Source: Michigan Department of Education, Bureau of Assessment and Accountability

Measurable and Rigorous Targets

FFY Baseline Target Actual

2005 100%

2006 88.0% 92.7%

2007 91.0% 98.5%

2008 94.0% 99.4%

2009 97.0% 99.7%

Indicator 4A: Rates of suspension and expulsion: Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of children with disabilities for greater than 10 days in a school year.

Source: Single Record Student Database, verification review



Calculations Using Previous Definition of Significant Discrepancy*

2005 1.2% 2006 < 10.0% 1.5%2007 < 9.0% 1.4%

OSEP Prescribed a One Year Data Lag for This Indicator2008

(2007-2008 data) < 9.0% 1.4%

Calculations Using Current Definition of Significant Discrepancy2009

(2008-2009 data)5.1% < 5.5% 5.1%

*Definition of Significant Discrepancy: A district was identified as having a significant discrepancy in rates of suspensions and expulsions if more than five percent of its students with IEPs received out-of-school suspensions/expulsions for greater than 10 days cumulatively during the school year. Districts with fewer than five students with IEPs suspended/expelled for more than ten days were exempt from significant discrepancy calculations. This new protocol was reported in Michigan’s FFY 2008 State Performance Plan (SPP).

Indicator 5A: Increase the percentage of students served inside the regular class 80% or more of the time.

Measurable and Rigorous TargetsA. Increase the percentage of students served inside the regular class 80% or more of the day


2005 54.0%

2006 > 55.0% 50.3%

2007 > 57.0% 53.5%

2008 > 59.0% 57.6%

2009 > 61.0% 61.1%

Source: Michigan Compliance Information System

Indicator 9: Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.



2006 0.3% 0%

2007 0% 0.3%

20080%

0.1%

20090%

0.1%

Sources: Michigan Compliance Information System, Single Record Student Database, Michigan Student Data System

Indicator 10: Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.



2005 1.7%

2006 0% 3.2%

2007 0% 1.7%

2008 0% 1.4%

2009 0% 0.9%

Sources: Michigan Compliance Information System, Single Record Student Database, Michigan Student Data System

Indicator 11: Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 30 days or a mutually agreed upon extension. Compliance target is 100%.

96.1%

87.1%

95.3%

99.1%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009Source: Michigan Student Data System

Documents

Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education