23
Data Mining Operator Benchmarking Studies for Artificial Lift Statistics, Technology Trends and Equipment Details Wonuola Scott & Aaron Duffus: Rushmore Reviews Cameron Laing: Laing Engineering & Training Services Ltd. 17 th June 2014

Data Mining Operator Benchmarking Studies for Artificial ... · PDF fileData Mining Operator Benchmarking Studies for Artificial Lift Statistics, Technology Trends and Equipment Details

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Data Mining Operator Benchmarking Studies for Artificial Lift Statistics, Technology Trends and Equipment

Details

Wonuola Scott & Aaron Duffus: Rushmore Reviews

Cameron Laing: Laing Engineering & Training Services Ltd.

17th June 2014

“The prime objective of benchmarking is to

understand those practices which will

provide a competitive advantage in the

market place; target setting is secondary.”

Benchmarking…

Paul Allaire Chairman, Xerox Corporation

Reviewing Best Practice

“Every day that a better idea goes unused is a

lost opportunity! We have to share more and

faster to drive learning and improvement.”

-

“We emphasize shopping for knowledge

outside…rather than inventing everything

ourselves.” Ken Derr Former CEO, Chevron

Rushmore Reviews

• Drilling Performance Review, since 1989

• Completions Performance Review, since 1994

• Well Abandonment Performance Review, since 2008

• Well Interventions Performance Review, since 2011

• Shale Performance Review, since 2012

• Data from hundreds of Operating Companies in 100 countries

• Over 52,000 DPR wells & 12,000 CPR completions

– WellViewTM / OpenWellsTM / DataNetTM etc. compatible for data input

– Web based search & analysis tools

Completions Review - Data & Uses

• 143 Data Items & Text Comments covering

– Well Description

• Depths /Temp /Press /Angle/ Multilaterals/Zonal Isolation/ PDHG /Compl fluid/ Csg-Liner-Tbg-

OH/Perforation Conveyance /Materials /H2S-CO2/Sand Control Equipt/Tree type/ Artificial Lift

/ Workover Reasons & remedial ops/Stimulation & other ops/ New Technology etc.

– Operational Timing

• Activity time / Non-productive time / WOW time

– Well Cost

• Total Cost / Overheads / Tangibles

– Completion Diagram

– Some Time/Event Plots

• Used for Planning / Timing /Budgets /Economics / Performance

Comparison / Experience Sharing / Peer to Peer Contacts / Ideas!

Norway, Denmark & UK

• Producing Oil Wells with AL

• Number of Completions per Year

– Platform and Subsea • 2013 data not yet fully published

Subsea Platform

Well

co

un

t

Significance of Artificial Lift

• 80% of UK Subsea Well Completions are designed for Artificial Lift

• 67% of North Sea Offshore Completions are designed for Artificial Lift

– >75% in UK and ~50% in Norway

No UK/Norway government statistics on Artificial Lifted Production

– no special R&D emphasis.

Artificial Lift Types in UK/NO/DK

• 15% ESP / 80% Gas Lift / 5% HSP

Rushmore Reviews Database Global Offshore Artificial Lift Types

UK/NO/DK

GL, 80.19%

Rest of the world Other, 0.32%

Rushmore Reviews Database Global Offshore Artificial Lift Types

GL, 80.19%

UK/NO/DK Rest of the world

(Platform) ESP (Subsea), 2.70%

Other, 0.32%

Rushmore Reviews Database Global Lift Types

Offshore Land

Combinations & Innovations found in the Review data

• ESP with Gas Lift back-up

– UK “subsea” / West Africa “platform”

• Gas Lift with Hydraulic Jet Pump option (Pakistan “land”)

• Deepwater wells with lift on seafloor (ESP/Multi-phase pump)

• Auto ”Gas Cap” Gas Lift (hydraulic control) subsea

• Water Injectors / Gas Wells with AL (ESP/GL/HJP) for clean

up / back flow

• Can-K Twin Screw PDP (ESP motor drive)

Innovative AL Completion Diagrams

ESP Equipment Trends: Last 30 UK Offshore ESP Completions

• Location

– 21 platform & 9 subsea (30%)

• 4 Operators

– Chevron: 11 / Ithaca: 10 / EnQuest: 7 / Talisman-Sinopec: 2

– Subsea: Ithaca:5 / Enquest:2 / Talisman-Sinopec: 2

• Dual ESPs

– 15 (50%) / 6 Platform & 9 Subsea (100% of Subsea ESP completions)

• Pod ESPs

– 23 (77%) / 16 Platform & 7 Subsea (78% of Subsea ESP completions)

– 13 Dual Pods / 6 Platform & 7 Subsea

• Workovers

– 15 W/O: 14 Platform & 1 Subsea

– Average time since last installation: 3.3 years

– Average time since last installation (excluding unique cases*): 1.5 years

– Subsea well time since last installation: ~2 years

* two platform well re-entries 12 & 15 years after last installation

Example ESP Completion Diagrams

Gas Lift Equipment Trends: Last 30 UK Offshore GL Completions

• Location

– 13 Platform & 17 Subsea (57%)

• Annular Safety Valves

– 3 Platform (23%) & 0 Subsea

– 1 Dual Tubing Hanger (no ASV)

•Number of Mandrels

– Maximum: 7

– 10 or more seen in older North Sea Completions

– Average: 2.75

•Dual Gas Lift Completions

– None since original Union Oil Heather completions?

Gas Lift Equipment

Well Interventions Review

• New Review with 130+ well interventions and growing

• 7 interventions involved gas lift work - at least 1 GLV change out required multiple runs

• 1 intervention was related to confirming a successful switch between dual ESPs

Completion Depth ESP vs Gas Lift

Well

co

un

t

Temperature Range for New Equipment Design

Operator Benchmarking Completion Running Time

Operator Benchmarking Non-Productive Time (NPT)

www.RushmoreReviews.com www.letstrain.co.uk

Questions?