Data Center Evoluon - Stanford University · 2019-03-11 · savings implementing hybrid cloud 25% reduction in latency of real-time data analytics apps 50% reduction in ... Wireless

Confidential – © 2015 Equinix Inc. Equinix.com 1

DataCenterEvolu.on

IhabTarazi,CTO


GlobalPla9ormwithunmatchedecosystems

Unmatched global footprint of 145 data centers in 40 metros post transactions

Network Dense, 1,100+ networks; Cloud Dense, 1,300 Cloud and IT service providers Submarine Cable Landings of the future

15 metros 54 IBXs

17 metros 64 IBXs

8 metros 27 IBXs

21 40 145 Countries Metro Areas Data Centers + = (1


Equinix Data Center at a Glance Secure, reliable facility for servers, data storage and networking equipment

Equinix Owns • Core and shell • Power and cooling • Exchanges and cross connects

Customer Owns • Servers, storage and networking

equipment

•  Long-life infrastructure assets •  Revenue generated from selling space, power and interconnection


How is Colocation Different? Data center industry segments

Wholesale Retail Managed Services

Customer need

Power requirement per tenant Average contract term

Mechanical infrastructure owned

Average number of customer/location

Owns server equipment

Interconnection environment

Tenant ability to expand

Service level

Sales channels

Property ownership

Logo examples

Choice of NSPs

Alternative to in-house data center Large-scale homogenous applications

300kw to 5+ MW 5 to 7 years Turnkey = Yes

Powered Shell = No 1 to 10

No

No

Limited

Limited to None

Direct & Brokers

Owned

Limited

Network edge solution for high-performance applications

20 to 300kw 2 to 4 years

Yes

50+

No

Yes

Often

Remote Hands Available

Mostly Direct

Owned or Leased

Many

Outsourced solution for younger businesses

0kw to variable Variable

No

100+

Yes

Virtual

Often

Fully Managed

Direct/Agents/Re-sellers

Primarily Leased

Limited

Source: Company filings, Company websites


TheEquinixInterconnec.onPla9orm™providesthecri.calbuildingblockstoimplementanInterconnec.onOrientedArchitecture™

NetworkProviders

IOA™Node

Communica.onsHub(PerformanceHub)

EcosystemExchange(InternetExchange(IE),EthernetExchange(EE),

CloudExchange(ECX))

(InsideEquinix)


Leadingenterprisesimplemen.ngInterconnec.onOrientedArchitecture™atEquinixhaveachievedtransforma.onalvalue…

PEOPLE LOCATIONS CLOUDS DATA

Workload/ Application

Business Impact

Customer Industry

Real-time collaboration Traffic optimization Multi-cloud IoT & distributed analytics

30% cost reduction in cloud connectivity cost/

analytic application

$8MM annual OPEX savings implementing

hybrid cloud

25% reduction in latency of real-time data analytics apps

50% reduction in OPEX

per app

Problem Inadequate user experience

Unsustainable growth in bandwidth cost

Inefficient & unsecure multi-cloud access

Insufficient customer insights

45% reduction in bandwidth OPEX /

employee

40% reduction in latency of customer facing apps

Engineering & Construction

Financial Services

Media & Information

Industrial Conglomerate

2.5x increase in bandwidth/employee while

reducing OPEX by 25%

38% reduction in

application latency of global collaboration

workflow


KeytechnologyshiOsthatareredefiningtheroleofDataCenters

Everything is Software Controlled

Mobility & IoT

Cloud

•  PrivateCloudInterconnec5on•  SubmarineCableLanding•  So;wareDefinedInfrastructure(SD-WAN)•  NextGenera5onMobilityandIoT•  NextGenera5onApplica5onsforMul5-Cloud•  Security

Confidential – © 2015 Equinix Inc. Equinix.com 8 8

Equinix Cloud Exchange

Google Service

Azure Service

AWS Service

Oracle Service

ü  Launch of Google Cloud Layer 3 Service

ü  Designed & Implemented Services Layer [on or off-devices, virtual or physical services insertion. NAT]

ü  Design & Launch of Microsoft Cloud O365 Layer 3 Service

ü  Design & Automation for Layer 3 Multi-Cloud (Buy side automation to Google, Oracle, MSFT)

2015 Cloud Exchange Accomplishments

§  One BGP Peering/Layer 3 connection unlocks entire portfolio of Layer 3 Seller Services

§  Traffic isolated for security via L2VPN & L3VPN services

§  Opt-in Traffic Model (no traffic from unsolicited providers or 3rd parties

Buyer Side Benefits - Enterprise

§  One Physical port unlocks entire Buy-Side Equinix Cloud Ecosystem

§  Traffic isolated for security via L2VPN & L3VPN services

§  Opt-in Traffic Model (no traffic from unsolicited providers or 3rd parties)

Seller Side Benefits - CSP


Submarine Cable Landing Station in Equinix

Traditional CLS Model

Combining the cable landing station and interconnection hub into a single solution reduces cost and complexity and increases network optionality for customers

Challenges: §  Cost/complexity of managing CLS and interconnection

hub infrastructure

§  Provisioning complexity and delays coordinating with fiber providers

§  Less architectural flexibility and “future proofing” due to fiber provider dependencies

New CLS and Interconnection Model in IBX

Benefits of new Architecture: §  New Submarine cable can bypass the need for a beach

cable station, saving significant capital and 12 months in construction time.

§  Submarine cables will get direct interconnection to Clouds at the Data Centers

§  Customers can implement open networking architecture for Submarine cables.


SD WAN is required for Cloud Interconnection Traditional MPLS networks do not provide the agility needed

1.  Combined Data/Control Plane in routers 2.  WAN Routers doing packet level traffic

mgmt 3.  Manual Router Configuration via CLIs 4.  Managing separate/disparate NSP

networks 5.  Static Coarse Grained Traffic

Management

1.  Separate Control & Data Planes (centralized controller)

2.  Flow Level Traffic Management between Forwarders

3.  API/Policy Based Configuration Management 4.  Overlay Network (Virtualize network using

SDN) 5.  Dynamic Monitoring and App Level Traffic

Shaping

3

5

4

2

Before SD-WAN SD-WAN

1


Public Clouds

On Premise

CRM

Finance

ERP

SQL

Documents

Data Visualization

Dimensional Analysis

Analytics and BI

Data Mining

Data Warehouse

On Premise Integration and Middleware

Platforms

Hybrid Cloud

Cloud Integration and Middleware Platforms

Multi Cloud Data Center Middleware platforms have high compute and network requirements. Distribution of data-sources and platforms over mixed Public and Private Networks.

On Premise/ Colo. Data Center

Finance

SQL

ERP Private Cloud

Analytics and BI

Data Warehouse

Applications transitioning to a Multi Cloud World following the Data


Mobile Network Trends

Trend 1: New shared LTE spectrum is available for general use by Service Providers and Enterprise Implication: Requires a new architecture to detect interference, adds significant free spectrum for use.

Trend 2: The next generation wireless capacity for 5G and the explosion of devices requires massive scaling and high performance. Implication: New Cloud based architecture is needed to support 5G and IoT Trend 3: Wireless networks will be fragmented with multiple spectrum and technology options used. Implication: Wireless networking is moving to Data Centers and requires peering and interconnection to Clouds.

Compute Network Storage

Mobile Devices

MNOs CSPs

Data Center

Emerging Mobile Network Landscape

NSPs CDNs


IoT and Mobility Trends 3-Tier IoT Architecture

Mobile/IoT Devices Tier Edge Tier Cloud Tier

CSPs

Wi-fi Operators

Free Spectrum Operators

Cell Tower Operators

NSPs

CSPs 12

3

Trend 1: New shared LTE spectrum is available for general use by Service Providers and Enterprise Implication: Requires a new architecture to detect interference, adds significant free spectrum for use.

Trend 2: The next generation wireless capacity for 5G and the explosion of devices requires massive scaling and high performance. Implication: New Cloud based architecture is needed to support 5G and IoT Trend 3: Wireless networks will be fragmented with multiple spectrum and technology options used. Implication: Wireless networking is moving to Data Centers and requires peering and interconnection to Clouds


Network and Cloud Security

§  9 out of 10 surveyed customers say security is biggest perceived barrier to further cloud adoption §  Cloud security landscape is extremely complex §  Dozens of relevant standards frameworks exist (e.g., ISO, NIST, FedRAMP, ENISA, etc.), more are

emerging §  Current network security technologies are not sufficient to protect against application level intrusions

§  New architecture is based on securing the Cloud and the Device §  Assumes Network will never be sufficiently secure §  Engaging in trials with new startups that secure the servers in the Data Center and track application

level flows.

Cloud Security Landscape

Cloud Security Architecture Focus