8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

1/24

Frequencies

Statistics

Usia Ibu (tahun)

N Valid

Missing

Mean

Median

Std. Deviation

96

0

26.115

26.000

3.0741

 

Usia Ibu (tahun)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 20.0

21.0

22.023.0

24.0

25.0

26.0

27.0

28.0

29.0

30.0

31.0

32.0

33.0

Total

2 2.1 2.1 2.1

6 6.3 6.3 8.3

4 4.2 4.2 12.510 10.4 10.4 22.9

8 8.3 8.3 31.3

11 11.5 11.5 42.7

10 10.4 10.4 53.1

11 11.5 11.5 64.6

13 13.5 13.5 78.1

10 10.4 10.4 88.5

3 3.1 3.1 91.7

2 2.1 2.1 93.8

5 5.2 5.2 99.01 1.0 1.0 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

L_USIA

N Valid

Missing

96

0

L_USIA

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid .0

1.0

Total

55 57.3 57.3 57.3

41 42.7 42.7 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Page 1

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

2/24

Frequencies

Statistics

Pendidikan

N Valid

Missing

96

0

Pendidikan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid pt

PT

sma

smp

Total

3 3.1 3.1 3.1

33 34.4 34.4 37.5

59 61.5 61.5 99.0

1 1.0 1.0 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

L_DIDIK (PT)

N Valid

Missing

96

0

 

L_DIDIK (PT)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid .01.0

Total

36 37.5 37.5 37.560 62.5 62.5 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

L_DIDIK(PT&SMA)

N Valid

Missing

96

0

L_DIDIK(PT&SMA)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid .0

1.0

Total

95 99.0 99.0 99.0

1 1.0 1.0 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Page 2

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

3/24

Frequencies

Statistics

Pekerjaan

N Valid

Missing

96

0

Pekerjaan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid irt

pns

wiraswasta

Total

54 56.3 56.3 56.3

5 5.2 5.2 61.5

37 38.5 38.5 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

L_PEK

N Valid

Missing

96

0

L_PEK

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid .0

1.0Total

54 56.3 56.3 56.3

42 43.8 43.8 100.096 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

Pendapatan Keluarga

N Valid

Missing

96

0

 

Pendapatan Keluarga

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid <

>

Total

39 40.6 40.6 40.6

57 59.4 59.4 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Page 3

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

4/24

Statistics

L_INCOME

N Valid

Missing

96

0

L_INCOME

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid .0

1.0

Total

57 59.4 59.4 59.4

39 40.6 40.6 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

 Asi Eksklusif 

N Valid

Missing

96

0

 

Asi Eksklusif 

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 0

1

Total

50 52.1 52.1 52.1

46 47.9 47.9 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

 Air Bersih

N Valid

Missing

96

0

 

Air Bersih

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 0

1

Total

55 57.3 57.3 57.3

41 42.7 42.7 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Page 4

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

5/24

Statistics

Cuci Tangan

N Valid

Missing

96

0

 

Cuci Tangan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 0

1

Total

55 57.3 57.3 57.3

41 42.7 42.7 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

Penimbangan Balita

N Valid

Missing

96

0

 

Penimbangan Balita

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 0

1

Total

54 56.3 56.3 56.3

42 43.8 43.8 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

Jamban Sehat

N Valid

Missing

96

0

 

Jamban Sehat

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 0

1

Total

57 59.4 59.4 59.4

39 40.6 40.6 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Page 5

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

6/24

Statistics

Riw_Diare

N Valid

Missing

96

0

Riw_Diare

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 0

1

Total

61 63.5 63.5 63.5

35 36.5 36.5 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

Usia Ibu

N Valid

Missing

96

0

 

Usia Ibu

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 0

1

Total

85 88.5 88.5 88.5

11 11.5 11.5 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

Usia Anak (tahun)

N Valid

Missing

96

0

 

Page 6

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

7/24

Usia Anak (tahun)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid .10

.11

.20

.30

.40

.50

.60

.70

.80

.90

1.10

1.11

1.20

1.30

1.40

1.50

1.60

1.70

1.90

2.00

2.10

2.11

2.20

2.40

2.60

2.70

2.80

2.90

3.00

3.10

3.11

3.20

3.303.40

3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4 4.2 4.2 4.2

2 2.1 2.1 6.3

1 1.0 1.0 7.3

1 1.0 1.0 8.3

3 3.1 3.1 11.5

1 1.0 1.0 12.5

2 2.1 2.1 14.6

4 4.2 4.2 18.8

2 2.1 2.1 20.8

11 11.5 11.5 32.3

5 5.2 5.2 37.5

1 1.0 1.0 38.5

1 1.0 1.0 39.6

2 2.1 2.1 41.7

4 4.2 4.2 45.8

2 2.1 2.1 47.9

1 1.0 1.0 49.0

1 1.0 1.0 50.0

2 2.1 2.1 52.1

1 1.0 1.0 53.1

2 2.1 2.1 55.2

2 2.1 2.1 57.3

1 1.0 1.0 58.3

1 1.0 1.0 59.4

2 2.1 2.1 61.5

2 2.1 2.1 63.5

4 4.2 4.2 67.7

1 1.0 1.0 68.8

1 1.0 1.0 69.8

4 4.2 4.2 74.0

2 2.1 2.1 76.0

3 3.1 3.1 79.2

1 1.0 1.0 80.22 2.1 2.1 82.3

3 3.1 3.1 85.4

2 2.1 2.1 87.5

2 2.1 2.1 89.6

1 1.0 1.0 90.6

Page 7

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

8/24

Usia Anak (tahun)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

4.10

4.20

4.30

4.40

4.60

Total

4 4.2 4.2 94.8

2 2.1 2.1 96.9

1 1.0 1.0 97.9

1 1.0 1.0 99.0

1 1.0 1.0 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

L_USIA_ANAK

N Valid

Missing

96

0

L_USIA_ANAK

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid .0

1.0

Total

48 50.0 50.0 50.0

48 50.0 50.0 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

JK

N Valid

Missing

96

0

JK

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid L

P

Total

47 49.0 49.0 49.0

49 51.0 51.0 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Page 8

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

9/24

Statistics

L_JK

N Valid

Missing

96

0

L_JK

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid .0

1.0

Total

47 49.0 49.0 49.0

49 51.0 51.0 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

L_RWYT

N Valid

Missing

96

0

L_RWYT

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid .0

1.0

Total

61 63.5 63.5 63.5

35 36.5 36.5 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

Diare

N Valid

Missing

96

0

Diare

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 0

1

Total

61 63.5 63.5 63.5

35 36.5 36.5 100.0

96 100.0 100.0

Crosstabs

Page 9

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

10/24

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

L_USIA * Diare96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

L_USIA * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

L_USIA .0

1.0

Total

32 23 55

29 12 41

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df   Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

 Association

N of Valid Cases

1.597a

1 .206

1.101 1 .294

1.615 1 .204

.284 .147

1.580 1 .209

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.95.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for L_USIA (.0 /

1.0)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

.576 .244 1.361

.823 .610 1.108

1.429 .809 2.524

96

Crosstabs

Page 10

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

11/24

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

L_DIDIK (PT) * Diare96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

L_DIDIK (PT) * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

L_DIDIK (PT) .0

1.0

Total

23 13 36

38 22 60

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df   Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

 Association

N of Valid Cases

.003a

1 .956

.000 1 1.000

.003 1 .956

1.000 .567

.003 1 .957

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.13.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for L_DIDIK

(PT) (.0 / 1.0)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

1.024 .434 2.419

1.009 .738 1.378

.985 .570 1.702

96

Crosstabs

Page 11

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

12/24

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

L_DIDIK(PT&SMA) *

Diare 96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

L_DIDIK(PT&SMA) * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

L_DIDIK(PT&SMA) .0

1.0

Total

61 34 95

0 1 1

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

 Association

N of Valid Cases

1.761a

1 .184

.080 1 .777

2.036 1 .154

.365 .365

1.743 1 .187

96

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .36.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

.358 .273 .469

96

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

L_PEK * Diare 96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 12

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

13/24

L_PEK * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

L_PEK .0

1.0

Total

36 18 5425 17 42

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

.520a

1 .471

.258 1 .612

.519 1 .471

.525 .305

.515 1 .473

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.31.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for L_PEK (.0 /

1.0)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

1.360 .589 3.139

1.120 .819 1.531

.824 .487 1.394

96

CROSSTABS

  /TABLES=Pekerjaan BY Diare

  /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES

  /STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK

  /CELLS=COUNT

  /COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

Page 13

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

14/24

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Pekerjaan * Diare96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Pekerjaan * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

Pekerjaan irt

pns

wiraswasta

Total

36 18 54

4 1 5

21 16 37

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

N of Valid Cases

1.548a

2 .461

1.591 2 .451

96

2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.82.a.

Risk Estimate

ValueOdds Ratio for Pekerjaan

(irt / pns)a

Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.a.

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

L_INCOME * Diare 96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 14

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

15/24

L_INCOME * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

L_INCOME .0

1.0

Total

41 16 5720 19 39

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

4.261a

1 .039

3.417 1 .065

4.242 1 .039

.052 .033

4.217 1 .040

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.22.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for L_INCOME

(.0 / 1.0)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

2.434 1.037 5.714

1.403 .992 1.983

.576 .341 .975

96

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

 Asi Eksklusif * Diare 96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 15

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

16/24

Asi Eksklusif * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

 Asi Eksklusif 0

1

Total

47 3 5014 32 46

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

41.787a

1 .000

39.088 1 .000

46.723 1 .000

.000 .000

41.352 1 .000

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.77.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for Asi Eksklusif

(0 / 1)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

35.810 9.515 134.774

3.089 1.984 4.808

.086 .028 .263

96

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

 Air Bersih * Diare 96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 16

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

17/24

Air Bersih * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

 Air Bersih 0

1

Total

46 9 5515 26 41

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

22.447a

1 .000

20.462 1 .000

23.082 1 .000

.000 .000

22.213 1 .000

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.95.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for Air Bersih (0

/ 1)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

8.859 3.405 23.048

2.286 1.503 3.478

.258 .136 .490

96

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Cuci Tangan * Diare 96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 17

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

18/24

Cuci Tangan * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

Cuci Tangan 0

1

Total

51 4 5510 31 41

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

47.351a

1 .000

44.447 1 .000

51.730 1 .000

.000 .000

46.858 1 .000

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.95.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for Cuci Tangan

(0 / 1)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

39.525 11.410 136.922

3.802 2.207 6.550

.096 .037 .251

96

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Penimbangan Balita * Diare96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 18

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

19/24

Penimbangan Balita * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

Penimbangan Balita 0

1

Total

46 8 5415 27 42

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

24.958a

1 .000

22.869 1 .000

25.902 1 .000

.000 .000

24.698 1 .000

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.31.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for

Penimbangan Balita (0 / 1)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

10.350 3.881 27.601

2.385 1.566 3.633

.230 .117 .454

96

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Jamban Sehat * Diare 96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 19

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

20/24

Jamban Sehat * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

Jamban Sehat 0

1

Total

52 5 579 30 39

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

46.426a

1 .000

43.531 1 .000

49.934 1 .000

.000 .000

45.942 1 .000

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.22.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for Jamban

Sehat (0 / 1)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

34.667 10.631 113.040

3.953 2.216 7.051

.114 .049 .268

96

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Riw_Diare * Diare 96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 20

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

21/24

Riw_Diare * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

Riw_Diare 0

1

Total

61 0 610 35 35

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

96.000a

1 .000

91.732 1 .000

125.954 1 .000

.000 .000

95.000 1 .000

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.76.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for Riw_Diare

(0 / 1)a

Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.a.

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

L_USIA_ANAK * Diare96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 21

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

22/24

L_USIA_ANAK * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

L_USIA_ANAK .0

1.0

Total

24 24 4837 11 48

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

7.599a

1 .006

6.475 1 .011

7.738 1 .005

.010 .005

7.520 1 .006

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.50.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for

L_USIA_ANAK (.0 / 1.0)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

.297 .123 .716

.649 .470 .895

2.182 1.208 3.940

96

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

L_JK * Diare 96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 22

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

23/24

L_JK * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

L_JK .0

1.0

Total

22 25 4739 10 49

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

11.129a

1 .001

9.759 1 .002

11.401 1 .001

.001 .001

11.014 1 .001

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.14.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper  

Odds Ratio for L_JK (.0 /

1.0)

For cohort Diare = 0

For cohort Diare = 1

N of Valid Cases

.226 .092 .555

.588 .420 .823

2.606 1.410 4.819

96

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

L_RWYT * Diare 96 100.0% 0 0.0% 96 100.0%

Page 23

8/16/2019 Data Carindha Output1

24/24

L_RWYT * Diare Crosstabulation

Count

Diare

Total0 1

L_RWYT .0

1.0

Total

61 0 610 35 35

61 35 96

Chi-Square Tests

Value df  

 Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-

sided)

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

96.000a

1 .000

91.732 1 .000

125.954 1 .000

.000 .000

95.000 1 .000

96

0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.76.a.

Computed only for a 2x2 tableb.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for L_RWYT (.0

/ 1.0)a

Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.a.

Page 24