1
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IN IDIOPATHIC NEPHROTIC SYNDROME What is the Optimal Duration of Therapy? Cyclophosphamide has been shown to be effective in the treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS).It is a drug, however, with well-recognised side-effects, including gonadal toxicity. Thus, it is essential to determine the shortest duration of therapy which will induce sustained remission. This retrospective study compared a 6-week short-course with a 12-week long-course of cyclophosphamide. The shorter treatment was less effective - relapse rate during the first year was 42% for the short-course patients and 8% for those given the long-course. At 42 months, only 21% of the short-course patients were in remission compared with 63% of the long-course group. Another study on the effects of an 8-week course of cyclophosphamide reportedly yielded results equivalent to the 12- week course. At present, there seems to be no advantage in continuing cyclophosphamide beyond 8 weeks. The authors recommend: e Cyclophosphamide should be reserved for those patients with INS in whom unacceptable steroid side-effects develop or in whom the disease is difficult to control. Cyclophosphamide therapy should be limited to 8 weeks at a dose of 2-3mg/kg/d. Cyclophosphamide should be initiated after remission has been achieved with prednisone. Fifty-three patients (age, 3 months-20years) with stl'roid-dependent INS were entered in the study. A short-course of cyclo- phosphamide 3-Smg/kg/d was given to 29 of them f>;r a period of 6 weeks of protein-free urine (mean duration, 6.8 weeks). The other 24 received cyclophosphamide 3-Smg/kg/d for 8 weeks, followed by 1.5-2.5mg/kg/d for another 4 weeks. All patients also received prednisone 50-75mg/m 2 on alternate days. Pennisi, A. et al.: Pediatrics 57: 94& (Jun 1976) INPHARMA 26th June, 1976 p9

CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IN IDIOPATHIC NEPHROTIC SYNDROME

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IN IDIOPATHIC NEPHROTIC SYNDROME What is the Optimal Duration of Therapy?

Cyclophosphamide has been shown to be effective in the treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS).It is a drug, however, with well-recognised side-effects, including gonadal toxicity. Thus, it is essential to determine the shortest duration of therapy which will induce sustained remission. This retrospective study compared a 6-week short-course with a 12-week long-course of cyclophosphamide. The shorter treatment was less effective - relapse rate during the first year was 42% for the short-course patients and 8% for those given the long-course. At 42 months, only 21% of the short-course patients were in remission compared with 63% of the long-course group.

Another study on the effects of an 8-week course of cyclophosphamide reportedly yielded results equivalent to the 12-week course. At present, there seems to be no advantage in continuing cyclophosphamide beyond 8 weeks. The authors recommend:

e Cyclophosphamide should be reserved for those patients with INS in whom unacceptable steroid side-effects develop or in whom the disease is difficult to control.

• Cyclophosphamide therapy should be limited to 8 weeks at a dose of 2-3mg/kg/d. • Cyclophosphamide should be initiated after remission has been achieved with prednisone.

Fifty-three patients (age, 3 months-20years) with stl'roid-dependent INS were entered in the study. A short-course of cyclo­phosphamide 3-Smg/kg/d was given to 29 of them f>;r a period of 6 weeks of protein-free urine (mean duration, 6.8

weeks). The other 24 received cyclophosphamide 3-Smg/kg/d for 8 weeks, followed by 1.5-2.5mg/kg/d for another 4 weeks. All patients also received prednisone 50-75mg/m2 on alternate days.

Pennisi, A. et al.: Pediatrics 57: 94& (Jun 1976)

INPHARMA 26th June, 1976 p9