Upload
naiara
View
19
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Cai, X., Fang, W., and Chan, K. Hong Kong Baptist University AEJMC Conference Aug.9-12. Cultivation effects of television advertising: An urban-rural comparison. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Cultivation effects of television advertising:
An urban-rural comparison
Cai, X., Fang, W., and Chan, K.
Hong Kong Baptist University
AEJMC Conference Aug.9-12
Introduction
• Commercial persuasion appears to influence not only our shopping and product use behavior, but also the largest domain of our social roles.
• Television advertising is an essential socializing agent in China.
Introduction
• China has a population of 350 million children under age 15.
40% urban VS. 60% rural
• In 2005, the per capita annual net household income 10,0493 yuan urban VS. 3,255 yuan rural
• The foci of present study
Literature Review
Cultivation Theory
• Heavy television viewers tend to adopt the television’s reality as their own real-world reality.
• By virtue of inexperience, young viewers may depend more on television for information than other viewers do.
Literature Review
Cultivation Theory
• There are two types of cultivation---mainstreaming and resonance.
• Cultivation effects can be measured at two different levels----first and second-order effects of cultivation.
Literature Review
Materialism
• This study adopts the Richins’ definition, view materialism as the priority a consumer places on the acquisition and possession of material objects.
• Two directions in empirical research on materialism
Hypotheses• H1: Television advertising viewing will have a
positive correlation with the belief about the prevalence of affluence in society among adolescents in both urban and rural China.
• H2: Television advertising viewing will have a positive correlation with the level of materialism among adolescents in both urban and rural China.
Hypotheses
• H3: The belief about the prevalence of affluence in society will have a positive correlation with the level of materialism among adolescents in both urban and rural China.
Method
• A survey of 792 adolescents aged 11 to 17 was conducted from October to December 2006.
• The structured questionnaire was self-administered.
Method
The urban sub-sample:• 391 respondents in Guangzhou city• Studying grade 7 and 8• The mean age was 13.3
The rural sub-sample:• 401 respondents in Henan Province• Studying grade 7 to 9• The mean age was 14.6
Results
• There were significant differences in all three key variables: television advertising viewing, the belief about the prevalence of affluence in society, and materialism among urban and rural respondents.
Mean S.D. t-value
Materialistic value orientation
5.2***
Urban 2.8 0.6
Rural 3.0 0.6
Motivation of viewing television advertising
5.4***
Urban 2.1 0.8
Rural 2.4 0.6
Notes: ***p< 0.001
The prevalence of affluence Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Please estimate how many families in 100 families that own private cars. 3.8***
…air conditioners. 5.9***
…motorcycles. 5.8***
…cameras. 3.6***
…personal computers. 7.1***
…cell phones. 0.3
Notes: ***p< 0.001
Results
• H1 was partially supported for urban respondents and not supported for rural respondents.
Urban: (Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics varied from 3.6 for cameras to 7.1 for personal computers, all significant at 0.001 level)
Rural: (Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z=5.8, p<0.001)
Results
• H2 was supported for both urban and rural respondents.
Urban: (r=0.28, p<0.01) Rural sub-samples: (r=0.29, p<0.01)
• H3 was rejected.
Discussion
• Television advertising viewing was higher among rural adolescents than urban adolescents.
• Urban adolescents had higher estimates of affluence in society than their rural counterparts.
• Rural adolescents endorsed higher level of materialism than their urban counterparts.
Discussion
• Television advertising's cultivation effects on the belief about the prevalence of affluence in society was not found among rural adolescents.
• There was no correlation between first and second-order effects.
Possible limitations
• A non-probability sample
• Only focus on television advertising
• Not include contextual and personal factors