CSAH 101CSAH 101Reconstruction Project

Wayzata Task Force Meetingy gSeptember 3, 2009

Agenda

7 00 “R I t d ti ”7:00 “Re-Introductions”7:05 2008 Activity Recap / 2009 Activities-to-datey p7:10 Discussion of Layout Revisions

( 12/16/08 St t t)(per 12/16/08 Statement)7:50 Discuss Next Stepsp8:00 Adjourn

2008 Activity Recap

• Task Force Meetings June – SeptemberD t il d T S N b• Detailed Tree Survey – November

• Position Statement - December

2009 Activities-To-Date

• Layout Modifications (May – Present)• Meeting with City Staff (Wayzata/Minnetonka)• Meeting with City Staff (Wayzata/Minnetonka)

Layout Revisions Discussion Typical Sectionsyp

Position Statement #1 2-Lane footprint through Wayzata except Locust Hills, McGinty and US 12 I t ti

√Intersections

Position Statement #2 Boulevard minimum dimension 10’ → 6’ √

Position Statement #3 Narrow the trail for historic homes road/trail doesn’t conflict with historic h

Xhomes

Layout Revisions Discussion McGinty Intersectiony

Position Statement #4 McGinty/Eastman Alignment Review Options

Position Statement #5 Prefer 4-way signalized intersection, consider one lane roundabout

Review / Discuss

Position Statement #7 New bridge should reflect features of Grays Bay, Locust Hills Bridges (stonework, arches)

√g ( )

SW Aerial Perspective - Existing

SW Aerial Perspective – Roundabout

SW Aerial Perspective – 4 Way Signal North

SW Aerial Perspective – 4 Way Signal South

NE Aerial Perspective - Existing

NE Aerial Perspective – Roundabout

NE Aerial Perspective – 4 Way Signal North

NE Aerial Perspective – 4 Way Signal South

View Looking South from 324 BushawayExistingExisting

View Looking South from 324 BushawayRoundabout

View Looking South from 324 Bushaway 4 Way Signal Northy g

View Looking South from 324 Bushaway 4 Way Signal South4 Way Signal South

View Looking North from 405 BushawayExistingg

View Looking North from 405 BushawayRoundabout

View Looking North from 405 Bushaway 4 Way Signal Northy g

View Looking North from 405 Bushaway 4 Way Signal Southy g

View Looking South from Railroad TracksExistingExisting

View Looking South from Railroad TracksRoundabout

View Looking South from Railroad Tracks4 Way Signal North4 Way Signal North

View Looking South from Railroad Tracks4 Way Signal South4 Way Signal South

Intersection Layout Options Attributes MatrixAttributes Matrix

4 Way Signal – 4 Way Signal -Roundabout

y gNorth

y gSouth

Total Layout Impervious Area (roadway) 5.0 acres 5.4 acres 5.4 acres

Retaining Wall Area 22,000 SF 25,300 SF 29,600 SF

Bridge Deck Area 20,500 SF 9,400 SF 9,400 SFTotal Trees Impacted 370 360 340

Traffic Operations, LOS, Ave Delay LOS-A, 4 seconds LOS-C, 24 seconds LOS-C, 24 seconds

Yacht Club Parking Impacts land swap – none land swap – minor medium Yacht Club Parking Impacts land swap – none land swap – minor medium

Speed through intersection 15-20 MPH 35MPH + 35MPH +Construction Cost (Wayzata Segment) $10.9M $9.1M $10.0M

Potential Tree Buffer to south (1450, 401) Yes YesNo - Large Retaining

Wall

Intersection Layout Options Attributes MatrixAttributes Matrix

4 Way SignalRoundabout 4 Way Signal - North

4 Way Signal -South

Driveway Impacts(access / slopes /

encroachment)(access / slopes /

encroachment)(access / slopes /

encroachment)Driveway Impacts encroachment) encroachment) encroachment)321 Bushaway (south

driveway) (9.0%) full/15%*/70 ft. RIRO/15%/70 ft. RIRO/15%/70 ft.*321 Bushaway (north

d i ) (7 0%) f ll/10%/25 ft f ll/10%/75 ft f ll/10%/65 ftdriveway) (7.0%) full/10%/25 ft. full/10%/75 ft. full/10%/65 ft.324 Bushaway (9.0%) full/3%/50 ft. full/3%30 ft. full/3%/50 ft.1450 Eastman Lane full/7%/5 ft. full/9%/5 ft. Not Feasible *401Bushaway/1450 Eastman full/5%/5 ft full/4%/5 ft full/10%/60 ft *401Bushaway/1450 Eastman full/5%/5 ft. full/4%/5 ft. full/10%/60 ft. 405 Bushaway (4.0%) full/10%/30 ft. RIRO/10%/50 ft. RIRO/10%/90 ft.421 Bushaway (2.0%) full/4%/15 ft. RIRO/10%/10 ft. RIRO/10%/10 ft.

Layout Revisions Discussion Miscellaneous

P iti P t ti f B h hPosition Statement #6

Protection of Bushaway homes, fences and walls

Potential Conflicts:620,630 Bushaway Fence inside ROW (not historic)

639 Bushaway Driveway entrance stone wall inside ROWinside ROW

231,401 Bushaway Fence (new retaining wall), y ( g )

Layout Revisions Discussion Typical Sectionsyp ca Sec o s

Position Statement #8 Minimize number and size of retaining walls

Discuss

Position Statement #9 No tree removal until plans finalized √

Position Statement #10 Independent traffic analysis Discuss

Position Statement #11 Provide field staking of roadway √

Next StepsNext Steps

• Select Preferred Intersection OptionSelect Preferred Intersection Option• Select LaSalle Intersection Option

R fi L t f t i t d ll l ti• Refine Layout footprint and wall locations• Field Stake Curb Lines• Refine Bridge and Wall design aesthetics • Formal Action by Council to Approve LayoutFormal Action by Council to Approve Layout