Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    1/17

    -------------- BHARGAVINIKITHA

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    2/17

    Equivocal Definitions of culture by HofstedeA collective programming of the

    mind which distinguishes one group fromanother

    Mental programming patternsof thinking and feeling and potential acting

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    3/17

    CULTURE INCLUDES:

    Learning values (dominant beliefsand attitudes),

    P artaking of rituals (collectiveactivities), Modeling against heroes (role

    models), and Understanding symbols (myths,legends, dress, jargon , lingo)

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    4/17

    The study comprised 116,000 questionnaires,from which over 60,000 people respondedfrom over 50 countries. Hofstede worked withIBM. From this he identified four bipolardimensionsPower DistanceIndividualism/CollectivismUncertainty AvoidanceMasculinity/ Feminity

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    5/17

    Introduced a fifth elementConfucian Dynamism or

    Long/Short Term Orientation , which was an attempt to fit theuncertainty avoidance dimensioninto the Asian culture

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    6/17

    efinition ProblemsMethodological Simplicity

    Equivalencyfour dimensions: functional,

    conceptual, instrument and measurementequivalence

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    7/17

    1. Power Distance2. Individualism vs.

    Collectivism3. Masculinity vs.

    Femininity4. Uncertainty

    Avoidance5. Long TermOrientation

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    8/17

    ...the extent towhich the lesspowerful membersof institutions andorganizationswithin a countryexpect and acceptthat power isdistributedunequally.

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    9/17

    Individualistsocieties: ties areloose and everyone

    looks out forhimself or herselfCollectivistsocieties: peopleintegrated into

    strong, cohesivegroups; protectionis exchanged forloyalty

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    10/17

    Centrality of workWays of managing& decision makingFem: equality,solidarity, quality ofwork lifeMas: equity,compete,performanceConflict resolution

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    11/17

    the extent towhich the membersof a culture feelthreatened byuncertain orunknownsituations.

    NOT the same asrisk avoidancePresence of rules

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    12/17

    Short-termorientationSocial pressure tokeep up with the

    Jonesessmall savingsexpect quick resultsconcern withpossessing Truth

    Long-termorientationThrift: beingsparing withresourceslarge savingsperseverancetoward slow resultsconcern withrespecting thedemands of Virtue

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    13/17

    RelevancyCultural HomogeneityNational Divisions

    Political InfluencesOne Company ApproachOut-datedToo Few DimensionsStatistical integrity

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    14/17

    Relevance

    Rigour

    Relative Accuracy

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    15/17

    Power Distance;Individualism/Collectivism;Masculinity/ FeminityUncertainty Avoidance;

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    16/17

    To conclude, more research is needed tocapture the shifting cultural maps which areinfluenced by, and influence, globalizationand technology, however this is difficult toachieve and may have temporal value. As aresult the work of Hofstede will continue tohave value now and into the future

  • 8/13/2019 Criticism of Hofstede_s Model

    17/17