11
Critical Challenges December 4, 2014

Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

Critical ChallengesDecember 4, 2014

Page 2: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

12,250

12,750

13,250

13,750

Projected Actual

+1.51%

-2.16%+0.17%

-0.69%

+0.92% +311+198

+165+72

+120

Percentages indicate variance between projected and actualRaw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases over the next five years

Enrollment Growth

Page 3: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY152,500

2,700

2,900

3,100

3,300

3,500

3,700

3,900

F/R Students

+12.04%

+14.87%

+6.31%

+3.84% +1.36%

Percentages indicate growth in F/R lunch numbers from year to year

Free/Reduced Lunch Student Increases Over Time (Economic Need)

Page 4: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15900

950

1,000

1,050

1,100

1,150

1,200

1,250

ESOL Students

+1.28%

+1.36% +0.96%

+5.98%

+7.53%

Percentages indicate growth in ESOL numbers from year to year

English as a Second or Other Language (ESOL) Student Increases Over Time

Page 5: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016$4,000

$4,200

$4,400

$4,600

$4,800

$5,000

$5,200

$4,868$4,807

$5,039

$4,720

$4,175

$4,083

$4,242 $4,250

$4,342

$4,240

Includes GF, lottery profits, miscellaneous NGF, and state appropriated federal stimulus funds adjusted by the CPI

Source: Fiscal Analytics, Ltd.’s Presentation to TJPDC October 2014

Inflation-Adjusted State Per Pupil K-12 Funding

Page 6: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

State Aid (in millions)

If per pupil state funding in 2008-09 had remained constant, our state funding in 2014-15 would be

$3.8 million greater.

08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 Unaudited

14-15 Budgeted

$45.8$41.4 $39.9 $39.0

$42.6 $43.0 $44.4

Page 7: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

$9.6

$15.1 $15.3$17.6

Mandated VRS Contribution* (in millions)

83% Increase ($8 million)

*includes 5% employee contribution, which the division was required to offset with a pay raise

Page 8: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

• Current: .6502• Adjusted: .6107• If our composite index calculation reflected

the land use taxation value of real property, additional state aid to ACPS would be approximately $2.9 million dollars each year.

Composite Index: Land Use Valuation

Page 9: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

School-Based Staffing per 100 Students

Adopted 07 Adopted 08 Adopted 09 Adopted 10 Adopted 11 Adopted 12 Adopted 13 Adopted 14 Adopted 15 9.60

9.80

10.00

10.20

10.40

10.60

10.80

10.59 10.60 10.61

10.43

10.04

10.44

10.51

10.67

10.50

School Based Staffing includes all positions based at a school directly serving students

School Based Staffing per 100 Students

Page 10: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

Non School-Based Staffing per 100 Students

Adopted 07 Adopted 08 Adopted 09 Adopted 10 Adopted 11 Adopted 12 Adopted 13 Adopted 14 Adopted 15 3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4.00

4.10

4.20

4.304.26 4.25

4.20

4.03

3.963.93

3.913.94

3.87

Non-School Based Staff includes Transportation Staff, Building Services Staff and Central Office Staff

Non-School Based Staffing per 100 Students

Page 11: Critical Challenges December 4, 2014. Percentages indicate variance between projected and actual Raw numbers indicate projected budget to budget increases

Despite salary increases, a teacher hired in 2009 brings home less today than when they began employment.

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

Net SalaryExponential (Net Salary) Net Salary in 2009 $sExponential ( Net Salary in 2009 $s)

Fiscal Year

Teacher Salary