Upload
dora-doreen-gallagher
View
221
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Creating Social Europe?
From EMU to the EES and the EU Social Policy Agenda
Structure of lecture
• European Monetary Union and its problems
• National Action Plans and the European Employment Strategy
• The Open Method of Co-ordination: new remits for ‘soft law’
• Towards a ‘Social Europe’?
Forces promoting economic integration & fear of social dumping• Globalisation and international financial
institutions (World Bank liberalism)• Multi-national corporations and international
financial markets• EMU and Growth and Stability Pact
– Agreed limits on debt – Member states lose interest rate / devaluation options– Cuts in welfare (esp. pensions)– ‘social insurance destroys jobs’ = competitive
restructuring ‘the drive to the bottom’?
Maastricht promotes negotiated solutions
• ‘Social Pacts’ – match wage control for job creation and welfare
protection – Holland, Italy, Denmark, Finland and Ireland
• 1999 Cologne Protocol– States to co-ordinate wages with monetary & fiscal
policies and productivity agreements– Structured social budgets
• Gender: EU reinforces women’s rights and participation rates rise.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/equ_opp/index_en.htm For specific questions on the gender equality programme:[email protected]
ESF expenditure on gender equality Share of ESF assistance (2000-2006) for equal opportunities in % Denmark has no specific allocation for gender equality as gender has been fully mainstreamed. Source: Communication from the Commission on European Social Fund support for the European Employment Strategy, 23.01.2001, COM (2001) 16 final/2
Amsterdam (1997), Luxembourg Process and Lisbon
• Amsterdam: European Employment Strategy– National Action Plans for Employment– EU to draw up guidelines and monitor performance– Objects:
• Create ‘more and better jobs’• Raise productivity• Promote regional and social cohesion
– Not legally binding: no sanctions
• Lisbon (2000): – attack on social exclusion– promotion of ‘knowledge based society’
• Barcelona (2002): raise participation older workers
EU Social Policy Agenda
• Directives on:– Work / life balance– Lifelong learning– Active aging
• Open Method of Co-ordination (‘soft law’)– Benchmarks performance– Enables policy learning
• EES and OMC recreates division between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ social expenditure
Kok 5-year report on EES (2005)
• Target: 70% male: 60% female (inc. 50% older workers) to be reached by 2010
• Main findings:– EU 15: employment up by 12 million– But male rate = 64% and female rate = 55%– EU 25 need 22 million jobs & 2% p.a. growth– Labour productivity slowed (poor quality jobs)– Black markets have grown– Long term unemployment grows– ‘working poor’ emerge
Kok report: priorities
• Problems: – low domestic demand + strong Euro– Better governance (weakness of OMC):
• more mutual learning• NAPEs need more political legitimacy
• 3 priorities– Attract (& keep) people (esp. older) in jobs by ‘making
work pay’ (tax incentives)– Raise adaptability of workers (multi-tasking)– Invest in human capital (education)
UK performance
• Weakness:– Like elsewhere, job quality neglected– Working poor– Gender pay gap widest in EU– Skill shortages / low productivity (training)– No social dialogue on EES
• Strengths– High female participation rates– Lower ‘unemployment’ (but incapacity and NEETS)
Open Method of Co-ordination: shifting strategies
• From EES to other social agendas– Pensions– Health care– Social inclusion– Role of ECOFIN in identifying welfare priorities
• Target setting and benchmarking as means to co-ordinate social Europe?– Lack of sanctions– ‘naming and shaming’– Performance to statistical target, not social objective
EU welfare futures?
• Leibfried: EU member states ‘saturated’ in welfare– Liberalisation is partial: little convergence– Welfare regime retain national identities (no multi-
national solidarity to defend welfare)– EU still contains Sweden and UK.
• Rhodes and Ferrera– Focus on negotiated flexibility (Netherlands &
Denmark)– Tax-funding of social support– Help to focus on placement of unskilled & marginal– Reconstruct retirement
Remaining problems
• Expansion of EU membership to 25 states (and new members view USA as paradigm)
• Refugees and migrant labour• (Offe) without ‘hard’ EU law, voters resurrect
national barriers of protection– UKIP in UK– Le Pen in France– Dutch & Swedish & East German equivalents
• Dwindling influence of OMC: current crisis