8
CPLJ mm P/FR/SK/49 No. 1 A FISHERIES SURVEY OF RICHMOND LAKE by G. C. Schultze SK-49 British Columbia Ministry of Environment Fisheries Branch Smithers, B.C. Skeena Fisheries Report No. 85-03 April 1985

CPLJ mm P/FR/SK/49 No. 1 A FISHERIES SURVEY OF RICHMOND ... · were kept for sampling (Appendix 1). All fish captured appeared to be about the same size. The average length was found

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • CPLJ mm P/FR/SK/49

    No. 1

    A FISHERIES SURVEY OF RICHMOND LAKE

    by

    G. C. Schultze

    SK-49

    British Columbia Ministry of Environment Fisheries Branch Smithers, B.C.

    Skeena Fisheries Report No. 85-03

    April 1985

  • INTRODUCTION

    Richmond (Priestly) Lake is a small lake (31 ha) situated

    approximately 35 km east of Burns Lake, B.C. The lake was originally

    surveyed in 1968. The only fish species present at that time was lake

    chub. Because it was aesthetically pleasing and access was fair, the

    recreational potential of this lake was considered high. The lake was

    subsequently stocked from 1969 to 1980 with rainbow trout (Table 1).

    Table 1. Stocking history of Richmond Lake (rainbow trout).

    Year

    Number

    Size (no/kg)

    1969

    10,000

    220

    1971 12,000 881 1973 7,900 936 1974 10,000 804 1976 10,000 714 1977 10,000 227 1978 10,000 333 1979 10,000 294 1980 10,000 357

    The stocking was discontinued after 1980 because the access road

    had degraded to the point that it was no longer passable for the

    hatchery truck. Richmond Lake was netted in 1977 by a fisheries crew to

    determine age distribution, size ranges and species composition.

    Because the stocking was discontinued in 1980, a fisheries crew

    was sent to the lake in June 1984 to assess the condition of the road,

    determine if fish were still present in the lake, and if they were

    present obtain age distribution and size range data. This would enable

    the fisheries branch in deciding whether to resume stocking.

  • METHODS

    A variable mesh gillnet was set for 2.5 hours and the lake was

    angled for 2.5 hours.

    RESULTS

    The access road was in poor shape with a mud hole that was

    marginal even for a four-wheel drive. Richmond Lake is a five minute

    walk from this point. There was a forest service campsite and a boat at

    the lake. There was also evidence that anglers are still utilizing

    this lake.

    Thirteen fish were angled and 14 fish were netted. Sixteen fish

    were kept for sampling (Appendix 1). All fish captured appeared to be

    about the same size. The average length was found to be larger than the

    fish sampled in 1977 (Table 2). The average weight of the 1984 sample

    was 533 g.

    Table 2. A comparison of the average length of Richmond Lake

    rainbows between 1977 and 1984 samples. 1977

    1984

    n=43 n=l6

    33.0 cm

    38.2 cm

    The scale analysis showed that the fish sampled in 1984 were 4+

    to 6+, older than the fish sampled in 1977 which were 2+ to 4+ (Table

    3).

  • Table 3. A comparison of the ages of the rainbows in Richmond Lake between the 1977 and 1984 samples.

    1977 1984

    Age Class Number % Number % 0+

    0

    0

    0

    0

    1+ 0 0 0 0 2+ 15 35 0 0 3+ 22 51 0 0 4+ 6 14 7 47 5+ 0 0 6 40 6+ 0 0 2 13

    TOTAL

    43 100 15 100

    DISCUSSION

    Since there doesn't appear to be any natural recruitment to

    Richmond Lake, there should not have been any fish younger than 5+

    found in the 1984 sample. After careful examination of the scale

    samples it was decided that the fish sampled were all of hatchery

    origin and that an annulus May have been lost possibly because of scale

    erosion or lack of growth because of stress due to lack of spawning

    opportunity. The fish sampled were all in spawning condition and the

    females were all egg bound.

    CONCLUSION

    The fish in Richmond Lake provide angling opportunities, and it

    is an aesthetically pleasing location. The road condition may have

    reduced the sport angling on the lake but has not stopped it. Since the

    lake is

  • still providing a sport fishery, stocking should be continued on the

    lake though instead of stocking 6,000 at 220/kg (the calculated

    stocking) put in 2,000 at 220/kg. The access road could be left the way

    it is until public pressure demands it to be upgraded.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. Resume stocking at 2,000 fry at 220/kg. 2. Leave access as it is. 3. Monitor the lake in 5 years to evaluate if any adverse changes are

    taking place. 4. See if there is any possibility for providing spawning habitat.

  • APPENDDIX 1

    Lake: Richmond Lake Survey Date: June 28/84

    Fish

    Species

    Length

    Weight

    Sex

    Comments

    Age Reading

    No. cm. in. g. oz. 1st 2nd 1

    RBT

    34.0

    425

    M

    R

    R

    2 RBT 35.5 450 F eggbound 3+ 4+ 3 RBT 35.5 400 M 3+ 4+ 4 RBT 36.0 500 M 3+ 5+ 5 RBT 37.0 450 M 3+ 4+ 6 RBT 37.5 500 M 4+ 4+ 7 RBT 37.5 500 M 3+ 4+ 8 RBT 37.5 500 M 3+ 4+ 9 10

    RBT RBT

    38.0 38.2

    550 450

    F M

    eggbound 4+ 4+

    5+

    5+ 11 RBT 38.5 525 M 4+ 4+ 12 13 14

    RBT RBT RBT

    39.5 40.5 41.0

    675 600 600

    F F M

    eggbound eggbound

    4+ 4+ 4+

    5+ 5+ 5+

    15 16

    RBT RBT

    42.0 43.5

    700 700

    M M

    bright fish skinny

    4+ 5+

    6+ 6+

    Ave. 382 Ave. 533 H20 temperature - 16°C Angled 2.5 hours — caught 13 fish Netted 2.5 hours — caught 14 fish

  • APPENDIX 2

    Richmond Lake

  • Richmond Lake rainbows