12
ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 301 0 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010 Ms. Marillyn A. Hewson Chief Executive Officer and President fi|0V Q\ £013 Lockheed Martin Corporation 6801 Rockledge Drive Bethesda,MD 20817 Dear Ms. Hewson: On September 17, 2013,1 sent you a letter soliciting your company's support of a cost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might be implemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part of your support would involve providing data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements. Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data may need to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Department encourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietary data—so we can better understand the cost implications of Department of Defense-imposed requirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified as proprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregated costs across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers on the relative costs and benefits of these requirements. The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA), a federally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) to perform this analysis. To initiate this effort, I have directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition, Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each of the companies that choose to participate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. If you wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, Performance Assessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule a session with Ms. McFarland and our team. Dr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected]. Sincerely, Frank Kendall

cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION,TECHNOLOGYAND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE301 0 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010

Ms. Marillyn A. HewsonChiefExecutive Officer and President fi|0V Q\ £013Lockheed Martin Corporation6801 Rockledge DriveBethesda,MD 20817

Dear Ms. Hewson:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part ofyour support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications of Department of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits of these requirements.

The Department will use, inaddition togovernment employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), a federally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperform this analysis.

To initiate this effort, I have directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each of the companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule a session with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can bereached at 571-256-1686 [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall

Page 2: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION,TECHNOLOGY

AND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE301 0 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010

Mr. W. James McNerney, Jr.Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer NOV 0 1 2013The Boeing Company100 N.Riverside PlazaChicago, IL 60606

DearMr. McNerney:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part ofyour support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications ofDepartment of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers ontherelative costs andbenefits of these requirements.

The Department will use, inaddition togovernment employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), a federally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperform this analysis.

To initiate this effort, I have directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, tohost individual sessions with each of the companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessmentand Root Cause Analyses, to schedule a session with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can bereached at 571-256-1686 [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall

Page 3: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION,TECHNOLOGY

AND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010

Ms. Phebe N. NovakovicChairman and ChiefExecutive OfficerGeneral Dynamics Corporation2941 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 100Falls Church, VA 22042

Dear Ms. Novakovic:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part ofyour support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications of Department of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits ofthese requirements.

The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), afederally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperform this analysis.

To initiate this effort, Ihave directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each of the companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband. PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule asession with Ms. McFarland and our teamDr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall

Page 4: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION,TECHNOLOGY

AND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301 -301 0

Mr. William H. SwansonChairman and ChiefExecutive OfficerRaytheon Company NOV 0 1 2013870 Winter StreetWaltham, MA 02451

Dear Mr. Swanson:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part of your support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications of Department of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits ofthese requirements.

The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), afederally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperformthis analysis.

To initiate this effort, I have directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each ofthe companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule a session with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall

Page 5: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION,TECHNOLOGY

AND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010

Mr. Wes Bush

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and PresidentNorthrop Grumman Corporation NOV 0 1 20132980 Fairview Park DriveFalls Church, VA 22042

Dear Mr. Bush:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part ofyour support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications of Department of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits ofthese requirements.

The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), afederally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperform this analysis.

To initiate this effort, I have directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each ofthe companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule a session with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall

Page 6: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION,TECHNOLOGYAND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010

Mr. Michael T. Strianese

Chairman, President, and Chief Executive OfficerL-3 Communications Corporation NOV 0 1 2013600 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10016

Dear Mr. Strianese:

On September 17,2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part of your support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications of Department of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits of these requirements.

The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), afederally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperform this analysis.

To initiate this effort, I have directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each ofthe companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule a session with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall

Page 7: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION,TECHNOLOGYAND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010

Mr. Louis R. ChenevertChairman and ChiefExecutive OfficerUnited Technologies Corporation NOV 0 \ 2013United Technologies BuildingHartford, CT 06101

Dear Mr. Chenevert:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part ofyour support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications ofDepartment of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits of these requirements.

The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), afederally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperform this analysis.

To initiate this effort, I have directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each ofthe companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule a session with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Page 8: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION,TECHNOLOGYAND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARYOF DEFENSE3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010

General John P. Jumper, USAF (Ret)Chairman and ChiefExecutive OfficerSAIC, Inc.1710 SAIC DriveMcLean, VA 22102

Dear General Jumper:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part of your support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications of Department of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits ofthese requirements.

The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), afederally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperformthis analysis.

To initiate this effort, I have directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each ofthe companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule a session with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall

Page 9: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION.TECHNOLOGY

AND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010

Mr. Mike Petters

President and ChiefExecutive Officer NOV 0 1 2013Huntington Ingalls Industries Communications4101 Washington Ave.Newport News, VA 23607

Dear Mr. Petters:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part of your support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications of Department of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits of these requirements.

The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), afederally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperformthis analysis.

To initiate this effort, I have directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition.Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each ofthe companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule a session with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall

Page 10: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION,TECHNOLOGYAND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010

Mr. David M. CoteChairman and ChiefExecutive OfficerHoneywell International Inc NOV 0 1 2013101 Columbia Rd.Morristown, NJ 07962

Dear Mr. Cote:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part ofyour support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications of Department of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits of these requirements.

The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), afederally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperform this analysis.

To initiate this effort, Ihave directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each of the companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule asession with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall

Page 11: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION,TECHNOLOGY

AND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301 -301 0

Dr. Ralph W. Shrader

Chairman, ChiefExecutive Officer, and President NOV ft 1 7M1Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. U ' Cm8283 Greensboro DriveMcLean, VA 22102

Dear Dr. Shrader:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part ofyour support would involveproviding data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications of Department of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits of these requirements.

The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), afederally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperformthis analysis.

To initiate this effort, I have directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each of the companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule asession with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall

Page 12: cost-benefit analysis ofregulatory and statutory requirements that

ACQUISITION.TECHNOLOGY

AND LOGISTICS

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010

Mr. Anthony Smeraglinolo wm/President and Chief Executive Officer WUV " ' 2013Engility Corporation3750 Centerview DriveChantilly,VA 20151

Dear Mr. Smeraglinolo:

On September 17, 2013,1 sent you aletter soliciting your company's support ofacost-benefit analysis of regulatory and statutory requirements that industry indicated might beimplemented more effectively, changed, or eliminated. Part of your support would involve 'providing data, when practical, that quantifies your costs to satisfy these requirements.

Since then, we received feedback from several companies that such actual cost data mayneed to include proprietary information to sufficiently inform the analysis. The Departmentencourages you to include as much detailed information as possible—including proprietarydata—so we can better understand the cost implications ofDepartment of Defense-imposedrequirements. In such cases, the Department will protect data specifically identified asproprietary. Unless the data owners grant explicit permission, only results that reflect aggregatedcosts across multiple companies would be shared publicly, to inform law- and policy-makers onthe relative costs and benefits ofthese requirements.

The Department will use, in addition to government employees, support from the Institutefor Defense Analysis (IDA), afederally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) toperformthis analysis.

To initiate this effort, Ihave directed my Assistant Secretary for Acquisition,Ms. Katrina McFarland, to host individual sessions with each ofthe companies that choose toparticipate, to discuss our desired outcomes and solicit your feedback on feasible approaches. Ifyou wish to participate, please have your representative contact Dr. Mark Husband, PerformanceAssessment and Root Cause Analyses, to schedule a session with Ms. McFarland and our team.Dr. Husband can be reached at 571-256-1686 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Frank Kendall