Upload
alvin-durnell
View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Chapter 11 Organizational
BehaviorNelson & Quick, 6th edition
Power and Political Behavior
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Concept of Power
Power - the ability to influence another person
Influence - the process of affecting the thoughts, behavior, and feelings of another person
Authority - the right to influence another person
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Concept of Power
Zone of Indifference - the range in which attempts to influence a person will be perceived as legitimate & will be acted on without a great deal of thought
Zone of Indifference
Z o n e o f I n d i f f e r e n c e
Managers strive to expand employee’s zone of indifference
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Sources of Organizational Power: Interpersonal
Reward Power - agent’s ability to control the rewards that the target wants
Coercive Power - agent’s ability to cause an unpleasant experience for a target
Legitimate Power - agent and target agree that agent has influential rights, based on position and mutual agreement
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Sources of Organizational Power: Interpersonal
Referent Power - based on interpersonal attraction; charismatic
Expert Power - agent has knowledge target needs
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Which Power is Most Effective?
Expert Power!
• Strong relationship to performance & satisfaction• Transfers vital skills, abilities, and knowledge
within the organization• Employees internalize what they observe & learn
from managers they consider “experts”
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Information Power
Information Power - access to and control over important information
• Formal/informal position in communication network
• Interpreting information when passing it on (the spin)
• Can flow upward, downward,and laterally
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Criteria for Using Power Ethically
Does the behavior produce a good outcome for people both inside and outside the organization?
Does the behavior respect the rights of all parties?
Does the behavior treat all parties equitably and fairly?
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Two Faces of Power
Personal Power - power used for personal gain
Social Power – power used to create motivation or to accomplish group goals
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Characteristics of Successful Power Users
• Have high need for social power• Approach relationships with a communal
orientation• Focus on needs and interests of others
Altruism Belief in justice
Belief in the authority system
Preference for work & discipline
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Sources of Organizational Power: Intergroup
• Control of critical resources
• Control of strategic contingencies - activities that other groups need to complete their tasks
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Sources of Organizational Power: Intergroup
Ways groups hold power over other groups (strategic contingency)– Ability to cope with uncertainty– High degree of centrality -
functionality central to organization’s success
– Nonsubstitutability - group’s activities are indispensable
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Power Analysis: A Broader View
Organizational Power
Coercive Power - influence through threat of punishment, fear, or intimidation
Utilitarian Power - influence through rewards and benefits
Normative Power - influence through using knowledge of member’s desire for belonging; letting members know they are expected to do the “right” thing
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Power Analysis: A Broader View
Types of MembershipAlienative Membership - members feel hostile, negative, do not want to be there
Calculative Membership - members weigh benefits and limitations of belonging
Moral Membership - members have positive organizational feelings; will deny own needs
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Etzioni’s Power Analysis
Type of Membership
Typ
e o
f P
ow
er
Alienative Calculative Moral
Normative
Utilitarian
Coercive
SOURCE: Adapted from Amitai Etzioni, Modern Organizations (Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964), 59-61. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Kanter’s Symbols of Power• Ability to intercede for someone in trouble• Ability to get placements for favored
employees• Exceeding budget limitations• Procuring above-average raises for employees• Getting items on meeting agendas• Access to early information• Having top managers seek out their opinion
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Kanter’s Symbols of Powerlessness
First-line Supervisors• Overly close supervision• Inflexible adherence to rules• Do job rather than train
Key to overcoming powerlessness: share power & delegate decision making
Managers• Assign external attribution -
• Blame others• Blame environment
Top Executives• Budget cuts• Punishing behaviors• Top-down communications
Staff Professionals• Resistance to change• Turf protection
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Korda’s Power Symbols
Time
FurnishingsSize of desk
Rectangular table
Locked file cabinet
Access
Who has access to you?
To whom do you have access?
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Korda’s Power Symbols
Power - there are more people who inconvenience themselves on your behalf than there are people on whose behalf you would inconvenience yourself
Status - a person’s relative standing in a group based on prestige and deference
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Political Behavior in Organizations
Organizational Politics - the use of power and influence in organizations
Political Behavior - actions not officially sanctioned by an organization that are taken to influence others in order to meet one’s personal goals
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Conditions Encouraging Political Activity
• Unclear goals• Autocratic decision
making• Ambiguous lines of
authority• Scarce resources• Uncertainty
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Effective Political Characteristics
What characteristics do effective political
actors possess?
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Influence Tactics
Upward Influence: the boss
Downward Influence: an employee
Lateral Influence: a coworker
Pressure
Upward appeals
Exchange tactics
Coalition
Ingratiation
Rational persuasion
Inspirational appeals
Consultation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Most Effective Tactic: Influence by Rational Persuasion
The person uses logical arguments and factual evidence to persuade you that a proposal or request is viable and likely to result in the attainment of task objectives.
This new procedure will save us over $150,000.
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Effective Tactic:Influence by Ingratiation
The person seeks to get you in a good mood or to think favorably of him or her before asking you to do something.
SOURCE: Information on slides 23-27 from the first two columns from G. Yuki and C. M. Falbe. “Influence Tactics and Objectives in Upward, Downward, and Lateral Influence Attempts.” Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (1990): 132-140. Copyright © 1990 by the American Psychological Association. Reprinted with permission.
Only you can do this job right!
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Frequently Used Tactic:Influence by Consultation
The person seeks your participation in making a decision or planning how to implement a proposed strategy, policy, or change.
This new attendance plan is controversial. How can we make it more acceptable?
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Frequently Used Tactic: Influence by Inspirational Appeals
The person makes an emotional request or proposal that arouses enthusiasm by appealing to your values and ideals, or by increasing your confidence that you can do it.
Getting that account will be tough, but I know you can do it.
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Political Skill
Political Skill - ability to get things done through favorable interpersonal relationships outside of formally prescribed organizational mechanisms– Social astuteness– Interpersonal influence– Networking ability– Sincerity
Learned traits
Photos courtesy of Clips Online ©2008 Microsoft Corporation
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Managing Political Behavior
• Maintain open communication• Clarify performance expectations• Use participative management• Encourage cooperation among work
groups• Manage scarce resources well• Provide a supportive organizational
climate
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Managing Up: The BossUnderstand Your Boss
and Her Context Her goals and
objectives The pressures on her Her strengths,
weaknesses, blind spots
Her preferred work style
Assess Yourself and Your Needs
Your own strengths and weaknesses
Your personal style Your predisposition
toward dependence on authority figures
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Managing Up: The Boss
SOURCE: Information on slides 29-30 adapted and reprinted by permission of Harvard Business Review. From “Managing Your Boss,” by J. J. Gabarro and J. P. Kotter, (May-June 1993): p. 155. Copyright© 1993 by the Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation; all rights reserved.
Develop and Maintain a Relationship that
• Fits both your needs and styles
• Is characterized by mutual expectations
• Keeps your boss informed
• Is based on dependability and honesty
• Selectively uses your boss’s time and resources
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Sharing Power: Empowerment
Empowerment - sharing power in such a
way that individuals learn to believe in their ability
to do the job!
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Empowerment’s Four Dimensions
Meaning – fit between the work role and the employee’s values and beliefs
Self-determination - having control over the way one does one’s work
Impact - belief that one’s job makes a difference within the organization
Competence - belief that one has the ability to do the job well
E2s
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Guidelines for Empowering
• Express confidence in employees
• Set high performance expectations
• Create opportunities for participative
decision making
• Remove bureaucratic constraints that
stifle autonomy
• Set inspirational and meaningful goals
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Point ANo Discretion
Point BTask Setting
Point CParticipatory
Empowerment
Point DMission Defining
Point ESelf-management
ImplementFollow-up
Alt. Choice
Alt. Eval
Alt. Dev
Problem Id.
Problem Id. Alt. EvalAlt. DevAlt.
ChoiceImplementFollow-up
Employee Empowerment Grid
Decision-Making Authority over Job ContentAmitai Etzioni, Modern Organizations, 1964, pp.... 59-61. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Dec
isio
n-M
akin
g A
uth
ori
ty o
ver
Job
Co
nte
xt
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Finkelstein: Why Executives Fail
• See themselves and their companies as
dominant, without peers
• Think they have all the answers
• Eliminate those not 100% behind them
• Rely on what worked for them in the past
• No clear boundaries between personal
interests and corporate interests
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Using Power Effectively
• Use power in ethical ways• Understand and use all of the various
types of power and influence• Seek out jobs that allow you to develop
your power skills• Use power tempered by maturity and
self-control• Accept that influencing people is an
important part of the management job
Copyright ©2009South-Western, a division
of Cengage Learning All rights reserved
Chapter 11: Reflect & Discuss
Scarface Video Clip
What to Watch for and Ask Yourself
• What are Mel’s sources or bases of power in this interaction with Tony Montana?
• What are Tony Montana’s sources or bases of power?
• What type of power relationship forms between the two men?