43
Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to Capacity Naeem Ali - CBTC Solutions

Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC

Signalling & their Impact to Capacity

Naeem Ali - CBTC Solutions

Page 2: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

AGENDA

Page 3: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Agenda

• Introduction

• Conventional Signalling

• CABS Signalling

• CBTC Signalling

Page 4: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

INTRODUCTION

Page 5: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Introduction

• Capacity definition

• The maximum number of trains that can pass a given

location during a given time period at a specified level of

reliability.

Page 6: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Introduction

• Several Factors that affect capacity

• Dwell time – Time spent serving a station

• Signal system - Minimum safety distance between trains

• Operating margin - Allowance for longer dwells

• Minimum headway - Minimum operational distance

between trains

• Junctions

• Turnbacks – Points at which a train changes direction

• Traction Power Limits – Number of trains supported in a

track section

Page 7: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Introduction

• Focus of this presentation is on “signalling systems”

and their impact on capacity

• Conventional Signalling

• CABS Signalling

• CBTC Signalling

Page 8: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

CONVENTIONAL SIGNALLINGTraditional Fixed Block Signalling

Page 9: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Conventional Signalling

• Drivers use trackside signals to determine:

• If the train can proceed forward (aspect)

• The speed the train will travel at

• A simple system may have 3 aspects:

• red – stop.

• yellow - proceed with caution.

• green – move at max speed.

• The location of the train is determined by track

circuit occupancy.

Page 10: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Basic Concept

• The signal engineer views the track in small chunks called blocks.

• The block length determines:

• Safety - how far apart the trains will be kept from each other

• Capacity – how many trains can pass through the system

• Challenge for the signal engineer

• Increase the block length means increased margin for safety but reduced capacity

• Reduce the block length means increased capacity but reduced margin for safety

A C D EB

1 2 3 4

Page 11: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Basic Concept

• One block separation must be maintained between trains for safety.

A C D EB

1 2 3 4

Train 8 Train 9

Page 12: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Basic Concept

• One block separation must be maintained between trains for safety.

• When train 9 moves into block 4, train 8 will be given a permissive aspect (yellow or

green signal).

A C D EB

1 2 3 4

Train 8 Train 9

Page 13: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Basic Concept

• One block separation must be maintained between trains for safety.

• When train 9 moves into block 4, train 8 will be given a permissive aspect (yellow or

green signal).

• Train 8 will move forward and stop at signal C, it’s an accordion effect.

A C D EB

1 2 3 4

Train 8 Train 9

Page 14: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Capacity

• If train 8 hits a trip stop travelling at 60kph and it requires 400m to stop, the block

separating train 8 from train 9 must be at least 400m long to satisfy the safety

requirement.

60km/h

If the train passes the signal at danger, the train is tripped and emergency brakes are applied

A C D EB

1 2 3 4

Safety DistanceDistance required for a train to emergency brake to a stop under a worst case failure

Train 8 Train 9

400m Block 400m Block

150m

Trip Stop

Page 15: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Capacity

• As train 9 travels away from signal C, train 8 will not be granted a permissive aspect

until train 9 has exited block 3.

• Instead, an artificial separation is created between train 8 and 9

• even though train 8 can move closer and still maintain a safe braking distance.

60km/hWasted space

A C D EB

400m Block 400m Block

1 2 3 4

Train 9Train 8150m

Safety Distance

Page 16: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Capacity

• Train 9 must completely exit block 3 before signal B provides a permissive aspect to

train 8.

• As train 9 moves further within block 3, the artificial separation grows.

• The trains can be closer together, but the fixed blocks prevent train 8 from moving.

60km/h Wasted space

A C D EB

400m Block 400m Block

1 2 3 4

Train 8 Train 9

Artificial separation longer than what is required for safety

Safety Distance

Page 17: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Capacity

• Once train 9 has exited block 3, train 8 will receive a permissive aspect from signal B.

• Impact to capacity –

• 800m separation between train 8 and 9; 400m longer then what is required for safety.

• Number of trains that can pass through the system is not optimal.

60km/h

Point at which train is tripped and EBs are applied

A C D EB

400m Block 400m Block

1 2 3 4

Train 8 Train 9

Permissive aspect

Page 18: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Capacity

• If a train is travelling at 40 km/h, it must adhere to the block separation designed for

60km/h.

• Static design, the signalling system cannot adjust the safety distance to the speed of

the trains.

60km/h

A C D EB

1 2 3 4

Safety Distance

Train 8 Train 9

400m Block 400m Block

150m

40km/h

Page 19: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Capacity

• Smaller blocks will reduce the train separation but at the expense of line speed.

• The slower speed may cancel out the benefits of smaller blocks.

• Fine balance between line speed and block size.

A C D EB

1 2 3 4

Train 8 Train 9

200m Block 200m Block

150m

40km/h

Page 20: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Wrap Up

A C D EB

1 2 3 4

150m

400m Block

Train 9

The signalling systems sees a 400 m train

• The signaling system considers the length of the train to be the same as the length of

the block

• If the block is 400m long, the train is considered to be 400m long.

Page 21: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Wrap Up

60km/h

A C DB

1 2 3

Train 8

800m Block

60km/h

A C DB

1 2 3

Train 8

400m Block

Reduced safety margin

• Increasing the block size increases the margin for safety but reduces capacity.

• Reducing the block size decreases the margin for safety but increases capacity.

Page 22: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Wrap Up

• Challenge for signal engineers is to calculate the

block length for maximum capacity while ensuring

safety.

Page 23: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

CABS SIGNALLINGEnhanced Fixed Block Signalling

Page 24: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

CABS Signalling

• Trackside signals are “usually” not used.

• Track circuits are used to the determine the

location of the train.

• The speed and distance to go are displayed on the

Train Overview Display (TOD) inside the cab and

enforced by the on board ATP.

• CAB signalling has the capability to allow a train to

move at multiple speeds within a block.

• Note: CABS signaling discussed here is with ATP protection.

Page 25: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

CABS Signalling

• CABS signalling does not alter the fixed

block/conventional signalling concept.

Page 26: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

CABS Signalling

• In conventional systems, the block design is based on a the line speed.

• single speed profile.

• The block design does not allow for multiple speed profiles within the same block.

A C DB

1 2 3200m Block

40km/h

Train 8 Train 9

Page 27: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Multiple Speed Profiles

• CABS signalling allows for multiple speed profiles within the same block.

• The driver will receive an indication on the Train Overview Display (TOD) when there

is a speed transition.

• Allows the train to travel at higher speeds with smaller blocks.

• Reduces the headway between trains, increasing the capacity.

A C DB

1 2 3200m Block

40km/h

Train 8 Train 9

60km/h

80km/h

Beacon

Page 28: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Capacity

• CABs signaling has similar limitations as conventional signaling.

• There is an artificial separation as train 9 moves away from signal C.

A C DB

1 2 3200m Block

40km/h

Train 8 Train 9

60km/h

80km/h

Beacon

WastedSpace

Page 29: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Capacity

• CABs signaling has similar limitations as conventional signaling.

• There is an artificial separation as train 9 moves away from signal C.

• Train 8 will not be given a permissive aspect until train 9 has exited block 3.

A C DB

1 2 3200m Block

40km/h

Train 8 Train 9

60km/h

80km/h

Page 30: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Wrap Up

• CABS signaling allows for smaller blocks, and

therefore a marginal increase in capacity but the

problems are similar to conventional signaling

• Increasing the block size increases the margin for safety

but reduces capacity.

• Reducing the block size decreases the margin for safety

but increases capacity.

• Challenge for signal engineers is to calculate the block

length for max capacity while ensuring safety.

• The track is not utilized to it maximum capacity.

Page 31: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

CBTC SIGNALLINGMoving Block Signalling - A Brave New World

Page 32: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

CBTC

• Trackside signals are not used.

• Track circuits are not used.

• Position is determined by a 2 way communication

between the wayside and train.

• Train transmits position.

• Wayside transmits a target point.

• The train is able to determine it’s position with a

resolution measured in centimeters.

Page 33: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

A View of the Track

A C D EB

1 2 3 4

Conventional/CABS Signalling (Fixed Block) – Chain of Blocks

CBTC Signalling (Moving Block) – Single Contiguous Track

Switch

Switch

Page 34: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Basic Operation

• If train 8 is travelling at 60 km/h, it must maintain a 400m separation from train 9.

• This separation is not enforced by physical track circuit blocks, but a dynamic

calculation by train 8.

60km/h Safety Distance Distance required for a train to brake to a stop

under a worst case failure

Train 8 Train 9

Point at which train applies Emergency

Brakes

400m Safety Distance

Page 35: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Basic Operation

• As train 9 moves forward, train 8 follows while maintaining the safety distance.

• There is no artificial separation between trains, only the bare minimum separation

required to maintain the safety distance.

Train 8 Train 9

60km/h Safety Distance

400m Safety Distance

Page 36: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Basic Operation

• As train 9 and train 8 slow, the safety distance is reduce.

Train 9Train 8

25km/h

100m Safety

Distance

Page 37: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Comparison

60km/hWasted space

A C D EB

400m Block 400m Block

1 2 3 4

Train 9Train 8150m

Safety Distance

60km/h

400m Block

Train 9Train 8

Safety Distance

Conventional/CABS Signalling

CBTC Signalling

Page 38: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Wrap Up

• The separation between trains is kept to a bare

minimum required to maintain a safety distance

between trains.

Page 39: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Wrap Up

• Safety distance is no longer a static entity enforced

by fixed blocks but an adjustable distance based on

a real time calculation of the train speed.

• If the train is travelling at a high speed the safety

distance is long and shrinks as the train slows .

Page 40: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Wrap Up

• CBTC signaling extracts the maximum capacity per

the track design.

• The maximum number of trains will run through the

system.

Page 41: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Conclusion

• Capacity is affected by the separation between

trains.

• Each signaling system has it’s own characteristic

that affects train separation.

Page 42: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

About the Author

• Naeem Ali is the Director and Principal Consultant of

CBTC Solutions Inc.

• 18 years of experience in developing and deploying

CBTC solutions

• He has worked on 7 different CBTC projects including:

• Newark Airport People Mover (USA),

• Jacksonville Monorail (USA),

• Las Vegas Monorail (USA),

• Busan Gimhae Monorail (South Korea),

• Makkah Metro (Saudi Arabia),

• Sao Paulo Line 17 (Brazil)

• Toronto Transit Commission YUS Upgrade (Canada).

• Singapore NSEW (Singapore)

Page 43: Conventional vs CABS vs CBTC Signalling & their Impact to

Contact Info

• Website:

• http://www.CBTCSolutions.ca

• CBTC blog on LinkedIn:

• http://bit.ly/cbtcsolutions-blog

• http://www.cbtcsolutions.ca/blog.html