Upload
zaiazwa
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
contoh OA
Citation preview
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 069 898 VT 017 655
AUTHOR Gosman, Minna L.; And OthersTITLE Occupational Analysis: Nursing Unit Administration
(Ward Administration). Interim Report. The UCLAAllied Health Professions Project.
INSTITUTION California Univ., Los Angeles. Div. of VocationalEducation.
SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. Bureauof Research.
PUB DATE Apr 71NOTE 89p.AVAILABLE FROM University of California, Allied Health Professions
Project, 1003 Wilshire Blvd., Santa Monica,California 90401 ($2.40)
EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29DESCRIPTORS Administrative Personnel; Career. Ladders; *Curriculum
Development; *Health Occupations Education; HealthServices; *Hospitals; *Institutional Administration;Job Analysis; Medical Services; Occupational Surveys;Paramedical Occupations; *Task Analysis; TaskPerformance
IDENTIFIERS *Hospital Ward Administration; UCLA Allied HealthProfessions Projects
ABSTRACTA national survey was conducted as part of the UCLA
Allied Health Professions Project to: (1) analyze the various levelsof personnel performing non-clinical tasks within the hospitalnursing unit (ward), (2) determine the components'of a curriculum fortraining such personnel, and (3) determine the feasibility ofdeveloping a pattern of upward career mobility in administration ofthe hospital nursing unit. A task inventory consisting of 169 tasksgrouped as either clerical or management functions was developed anddistributed to a panel of experts and to 243 unit administrationpersonnel. Responses from 189 employees and the expert panel revealedthat: (1) Tasks clustered into two groups, with one group comprisingtasks which might be accomplished by clerical personnel and the othercomprising tasks which might be performed by managerial personnel;(2) In general, the current performance of tasks by variousoccupational levels is at a variance with practices recommended bythe expert panel; and (3) The expert panel rated many tasks higher indifficulty than the personnel performing them. Implications forcurriculum development are included, and the survey questionnairesand other study materials are appended. pm
TIF. UCLA ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONS PROJECT
OCCUPATIONAL ANALYSIS
NURSING UNIT ADMINISTRATION
(WARD ADMINISTRATION)
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELESDIVISION OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION
ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONS PROJECT
April 1971
ReprintedJune 1972
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELESDivision of Vocational Education
ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONS PROJECT
EXECUTIVE RESEARCH AND DESIGN GROUP(EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE)
Melvin L. Barlow, Professor of Education, ChairmanDirector, Division of Vocational EducationUniversity of California, Los Angeles
David A lien, Coerd inatorProfessional Resources Development Unit
'Bureau of Industrial EducationState Department of Education
Miles H. Anderson, .Acting DirectorAllied Health Professions ProjectDivision of Vocational EducationUniversity of California, Los Angeles
13. Lamar Johnson, Professor of EducationUniversity of California, Los Angeles
Richard S. Nelson, ChiefProgram OperationsVocational EducationBureau of Industrial EducationState Department of Education
Bernard R. StrohmAssistant Director of Hospitals and ClinicsUniversity of California, Los Angeles
STAFF
Melvin L. Barlow, Ed.D. Principal Investigator andProject Director
Miles H. Anderson, Ed.D. Acting Director
Thomas E. Freeland, Ph.D. Deputy Director
Carol Tripp Project Coordinating Assistant
Mary Ellison EditorsSvlva GrossmanSeba Kolb
1003 Wilshire Boulevard, Santa Monica, California 90401 (213) 393-9281
coCD-
C CD
0"-
O1.0
Occupational Analysis
NURSING UNIT ADMINISTRATION
(Ward Administration)
Interim Report
Minna L. Gosman, M.P.H.
G. B. Krishnamurty, Dr.P.H.
Glenn Reeder
Robert R. Henrich, M.S.
Katherine L. Goldsmith, Dr.P.H.
U.S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION & WELFAREOFFICE OF EDUCATION
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEH REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROMTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGMATING U POINTS OF VIEW OR OPENIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILYREPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY
Research and Demonstration Grant 8-0627U.S. Office of Education, Bureau of ResearchDepartment of Health, Education, and Welfare
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELESDivision of Vocational EducationALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONS PROJECT
April 1971
ReprintedJune 1972
This publication is covered bycommon-law copyright and maynot be excerpted or reproducedin any way without permissionof the authors.
f
This publication was prepared pursuant toGrant No. 8-0627 with the Office of Education,U. S. Department of Health, Education, andWelfare. Points of view or opinions weredeveloped on the basis of advisory committeesuggestions and survey data. They do not,therefore, necessarily represent officialOffice of Education position or policy
FOREWORD
The Division of Vocational Education, University of California, is an
adMinistrative unit of the University concerned with responsibilities for
research, teacher education, and public service in the broad area of vocational
and technical education. During 1968 the Division entered into an agreement
with the U.S. Office of Education to prepare curricula and instructional
materials for a variety of allied health areas. For the most part such
materials are related to pre-service and in-service training from on-the-job
instruction through Associate degree programs.
This report is a summary of the functional analysis of the occupational
groups within the area of hospital Nursing Unit Administration (Ward Adminis-
tration). A national panel of experts, selected among the leaders in the
field, provided assistance in the identification and evaluation of the tasks
contained in a questionnaire distributed country-wide. The survey was used
to identify performance of tasks by job titles in the nursing unit in health
care facilities throughout the nation.
Melvin L. Barlow, DirectorDivision of Vocational EducationUniversity of California
Professor of Education, UCLA
Principal Investigator,Allied Health Professions Projects
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY ix
A. Development of the Task List 3B. Objectives and Design of the Survey Instrument 5C. Other Data 5D. Background Information 5E. Survey Sample 6IF. Method of Administering the Questionnaire 6
III DATA ANALYSIS
I INTRODUCTION
The Projects and their Goals 1
II PROCEDURES
A. Analysis of Background Information from the Respondents . . . . 7B. Description of Statistics Used 16C. Compiling Data on Performance by Clerical and
Managerial Categories 16D. Task List Exclusions and Additions 17E. Distribution of Tasks by Occupational Category 17
IV RESULTS 19
A-(1) Clerical Functions - Record Keeping 22A-(2) Clerical Functions - Communications 26A-(3) Clerical Functions - Patient-Centered Activities 31A-(4) Clerical Functions - Supplies and Equipment 34A-(5) Clerical Functions - Safety and Sanitation 37B-(1) Administrative Functions - Establish Objectives and
Policies 39
Contents (continued) Page
B-(2) Administrative Functions - Plan DepartmentalOrganization 41
B-(3) Administrative Functions - Staff Selection andManagement 43
B-(4) Administrative Functions - Budgeting 46B-(5) Administrative Functions - Coordinate Activities
Within the Unit, Department, and Total Facility 48B-(6) Administrative Functions - Education and Training 50B-(7) Administrative Functions - Research 52
Other Findings Related to Tasks Performed by Administratorsand Nursing Directors 53
C. Distribution of Tasks by Occupational Title 55
V. CONCLUSIONS 59
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Roster of Members of Expert Panel Participatingin National Sdrvey 61
Appendix 2-A Sample Page ofAppendix 2-A Sample Page of Survey Questionnaire Submitted
to Expert Panel 63
Appendix 2-B Sample Page of Survey Questionnaire Submittedto Respondents 64
Appendix 3 Background Information Sheet 65
Appendix 4-A Survey Directions to Survey Respondents 67
Appendix 4-B Survey Directions to Expert Panel 68
Appendix 5 Hospitals Selected for Study 69
Appendix 6 Tasks Judged by Expert Panel as Outside the Purviewof the Nursing Administration Unit in the HealthFacility 75
Appendix 7 Block I: Tasks Clustered into Major Content AreasPerformed by Clerks and Managers 76
Appendix 8 Block II: Tasks Clustered into Major Content AreasPerformed by Managers Only 80
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Page
1. Number of Questionnaires Distributed and Percent ResponsesReceived, by Geographic Area 7
2. Respondents by Position-Title 8
3. Respondents by Occupational Category and Geographic Area 9
4. :Description of Respondents by Occupational Category and SelectedVariables
Size of Hospital and Area of Patient Care 12
Sex, Age, and Academic Education 13
Technical or Training Programs, Certification, License,Registration, and Salary 14
Previous Position Held and Years in Present Position 15
5. Tasks Currently Performed Exclusively by Directors ofNursing and Administrators 54
vii
A-(1)
A-(4)
A-(5)
B-(1)
B-(2)
B-(3)
B-(4)
B-(5)
FIGURES
Page
Clerical Functions - Record Keeping . 20
A-(2) Clerical Functions - Communications 24
A-(3) Clerical Functions - Patient-Centered Activities 28
Clerical Functions - Supplies and Equipment 33
Clerical Functions - Safety and Sanitation 36
Administrative Functions -Policies
Administrative FunctionsOrganization
Administrative FUnctions
Administrative Functions
Administrative Functions
Establishing Objectives and
- Planning Departmental
38
40
- Staff Selection and Management . . . 42
45- Budgeting
- Coordinating Activities Withinthe Unit, Department, and Total Facility 47
B-(6) Administrative Functions - Education and Training 49
B-(7) Administrative Functions - Research 51
C. Pattern of Upward Mobility
viii
57
SUMMARY
Objectives
1. To analyze the various levels of personnel currently performing thenon-clinical tasks within the hospital nursing unit (ward).
2. To determine the components of a curriculum needed for trainingpersonnel to perform non-clinical functions within the hospitalnursing unit.
3. To determine the feasibility of developing a pattern of upwardcareer mobility in the administration of the hospital nursing'unit.
Procedures Employed
1. Search of pertinent literature to determine current practices andtrends in Nursing Unit Administration ;(Ward Administration).
2. Development of a survey instrument based on an inventory of non-clinical tasks in Nursing Unit Administration (Ward Administration).
3. Survey by Expert Panel selected nationwide from leaders in theNursing Unit Administration (Ward Administration) field to evaluatethe performance of the tasks within the Nursing Unit Administration(Ward Administration) function.
4. Survey of the level of personnel performing the non-clinical tasksin the administration of the nursing unit (ward) in a nationalsample of hospitals.
5. Analysis of survey data,for the development of a curriculum.
Findings
1. Tasks were found to cluster into two groups: the first groupcomprised tasks which might be accomplished by clerical personnel,and a second-level group those which might be performed bymanagerial personnel. Survey results reveal that first-leveltasks were performed by both clerical and managerial personnel.Second-level tasks were performed only by managerial personnel.
2. For certain tasks, the Expert Panel recommends performance by ahigher level of occupational category than is currently thepractice. In other instances, the recommended level of occupationalcategory is lower. In general, the current performance of tasksby various occupational levels in Nursing Unit Administration isat variance-v/ 1th practices recommended by the expert panel.
3. The survey results reveal no discernible relationship betweencriticality and difficulty. When the Expert Panel rates a taskas being very critical they do not necessarily rate the task asbeing very difficult.
ix
10
4. The Expert Panel rates many tasks higher in difficulty than dothe personnel performing the tasks.
Implications for Curriculum Development
1. The core, or Step One of Unit Administration curriculum, isinstructional material to cover the skills and knowledge requiredto perform the tasks done by both clerical and managerial personnel.The balane of the curriculum consists of instructional material toprovide the skills and knowledge required to perform a secondgroup of tasks done only by managerial personnel. The progressionfrom first,level'skills through the second-level skills providesa method of upgrading (vertical mobility) from the entry-levelto the unit manager occupation.
2. The number of persons surveyed who had neither training norprevious hospital experience in unit administration suggeststhat the hospital must carry the burden of instruction. Instruc-tional modules for training new employees would be beneficial anddesirable.
3. Training and experience in unit management might bt logicallysequenced to provide an alternate route to the level of tospitaladministrator.
4. The administrator or manager of the hospital nursing unit isconsidered a "middle-management" position. Where these positionsare held by non-nursing personnel, the majority are male. Ifthe unit manager position were to be filled by non-nursing personnel,it is believed that more male personnel might be attracted to theoccupation.
x
OCCUPATIONAL ANALYSIS OF TASKS PERFORMEDIN HOSPITAL UNIT MANAGEMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
The Projects and Their Goals
Early in 1968 the United States Office of Education invited proposalsfor research and development programs to stimulate the recruitment and train-ing of manpower for the allied health occupations. One of the organizationsinvited to participate was the Division of Vocational Education of theUniversity of California at Los Angeles. A proposal submitted by the divisionwas approved by the Office of Education and funded for a four-year period.Designated as the Allied Health Professions Projects, the program beganoperations in August 1968.
The fundamental objectives of the Allied Health Professions Projectsare to develop curricula and instructional materials for those allied healthfunctions that can be taught to the Associate degree level, and to developin-service and pre-service instructional programs for those health-relatedoccupations for which on-the-job training may be appropriate.
The initial steps leading to the development of curricula involve theidentification and listing of all possible tasks in a specified functionalarea, and verification of their performance by personnel in the occupationalcategories under consideration. The use of a task inventory, it was believed,could provide performance goals and delineate the specific skills which mustbe learned to do the job. The health functions to be explored included bothfacility support services and clinical occupations.
Nursing Unit Administration (Ward Administration) was identified as oneof the major occupational areas for which the development of curricula wasenvisioned. The present report deals with the results of a survey of taskperformance in this field.
The nursing unit is the area of a hospital plant designated and equippedto deliver nursing care to a group of patients. The nursing units vary insize and according to the type of nursing care required.
Nursing Unit Administration is defined as a non-clinical patient carefunction found on the hospital nursing unit. It includes clerical, adminis-trative, and managerial operations.
Nursing Unit Administration is not a new concept. The presence of aclerk on the unit became standard practice in some hospitals as long as 30year ago.l
Freeing the Nurse to Nurse," AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, March 1964,page 73.
Historically, little work has been done in developing Unit Administrationcurricula. The growing complexity of the modern health care system has meantdemands of increasing scope and difficulty made on the nurse. As the roleof nursing has expanded, too few trained nurses have been available to meetthe needs of our hospitals. The occupations of Unit Clerk and Unit Managerhave emerged in response to the need for relieving the nurse of time-consumingclerical and non-clinical management duties that are not properly a part ofthe professional nursing function. In order to avoid semantic confusionsthat might arise from the lack of standardization of nomenclature, the word"unit" has been chosen in preference to "ward". Though Ward Administrationis a commonly accepted term, it may carry negative connotations and does notadequately describe the modern nursing unit with private and semi-privaterooms.
2
II. PROCEDURES
A. Development of the Task List
In keeping with the objectives of the Allied Health Professions Projects,a task analysis of Nursing Unit Administration occupations was undertaken.The project staff developed a survey instrument for the analysis of occupationsof all personnel who perform non-clinical tasks within the hospital nursingunit. What follows is a brief discussion of the survey instrument and thekind of information it provides in relation to the Nursing Unit Adminstration'soccupations.
1. Task identification
Materials for an initial list of Unit Administration tasks wereobtained by utilizing several sources. A survey of the relevant literaturewas made, job descriptions were obtained, practitioners were interviewed toprovide information regarding their job activities, and actual observationsof nursing unit clerical and managerial personnel in several hospitals inthe Los Angeles area were made by an Allied Health Professions Projectsresearch assistant.
Results of this research suggested that there are two principal categoriesof personnel engaged in Unit Administration functions: the first categoryis composed of persons performing mainly clerical and secretarial functionsand having such titles as unit clerk, ward clerk, station secretary, and unitsecretary; the second category is composed of persons performing administrative,managerial,and other non-clinical functions, including those concerned withproviding supplies to the nursing unit. These persons have such titles asunit manager, ward manager, pavilion manager, floor manager, unit supervisor,and patient service coordinator. While the occupations of unit clerk andunit manager are distinguishable in general terms, the degree of overlapbetween them with respect to specific functions is sufficient to make compi-lation of separate task lists for the two occupations impractical at thispoint. Consequently, a single task list has been developed to cover alltasks that might be performed by personnel in either or both categories asindicated by the literature and observations in the field.
Following task identification, the list consisted of 169 tasks groupedunder 12 major sub-headings defining broad areas of activities. The sub-headings were further clustered and designated as either clerical or adminis-trative functions. The functional areas, with examples of the kinds of taskscomprising them are:
Clerical Functions
Record Keeping:
Communications:
"Record appropriate information in Kardex."
"Requisition laboratory services."
Patient-Centered Activities: "Record admission of new patient onappropriate forms."
3
14
Supplies and Equipment: "Place supplies and equipment inassigned position."
Safety and Sanitation: "Fill out accident reports."
Administrative and Management Functions
Objectives and Policies:
Planning and DepartmentalOrganization:
"Formulate goals of nursing unit."
"Determine staffing needs."
Staff Selection and "Rotate duty assignment of employees."Management:
Budgeting: "Determine supply needs."
Coordinating Activities: "Conduct staff meetings."
Education and Training: "Give on-the-job training."
Research: "Test new equipment and procedures."
2. Pre-surveying the Task List
A pre-survey was conducted to test the preliminary Unit Administra-tion task list on a small group of respondents before presenting it to thelarger national survey sample. The pre-survey provided suggestions foradditions, deletions, and modifications of tasks from persons with experiencein the field of Unit Administration.
Whenever possible, the respondent completed the survey questionnairein the presence of an Allied Health Professions Projects research assistant.Thus, when a respondent appeared to experience confusion or difficulty inresponding to a task, it was possible to determine the cause and correct theproblem.
As the pre-survey progressed, the task list was continually revised,with modifications based on the suggestions and criticisms of successiverespondents being incorporated into the list before presenting the question-naire to later respondents. Tasks that a majority of respondents considerednot to be germane to the field were either eliminated or re-worded assuggested by respondents. As the pre-survey continued, fewer criticismswere voiced by successive respondents, and the final draft of the task listwas developed after the tenth respondent had been surveyed.
It was demonstrated in the pre-survey that the sequence of taskslisted in the questionnaire needed to be modified. The interest of bothclerical and managerial staff was sustained throughout the questionnaireby placing the "Clerical" section before the "Administrative" section. Incontrast, when the "Administrative" section was first, clerical personnelwho had little role in performing these tasks tended to be less interested.
4
15.
B. Objectives and Design of the Survey Instrument
With respect to an occupational function, the major intent of the AlliedHealth Professions Projects staff was to gather those data which would bemost relevant to the development of instructional materials. The survey wasspecifically directed to the following questions:
1. Does the individual perform the task?
2. Does the individual supervise the performance of the task?
3. What is the frequency with which each task is performed?
4. What is the level of difficulty of the task?
It was assumed that the employee himself could most accurately describethe frequency with which he performed a task. The assessment by personnelof the difficulty of a task was thought to be useful in determining the conceptsor skills involved in competent performance.
The results of the task survey do not by themselves provide the fullrange of information required for adequate task analysis. The knowledgeof effective dimensions essential to task performance are not all obtainablethrough questions directed to personnel. For example, the dimension of"difficulty" has both a subjective and an objective component. Informationon the former may be obtained by the responses of personnel in the taskinventory survey discussed above; to measure the objective component-requiresexpert analysis and evaluation of the task and its accompanying procedures.
A sample page of the survey instrument along with covering informationalmaterial appears in Appendix 2B. The entire task list and all survey questionsare given in tables which accompany the text.
C. Other Data
In addition to the responses of personnel, a group of leading expertsin the occupational area was asked to make judgments concerning dimensionsof task performance deemed important in the building of an innovative train-ing program. These dimensions are:
1. Difficulty
2. Criticality
3. Occupational Level
A description of the scales and the procedure for their application bythe panel of experts are found in Appendix 4. The roster of the panelparticipating in the study appears in Appendix 1.
D. Background Information
Each person to whom the questionnaire was given was also requested tofurnish background information covering his work situation and personal
5
characteristics. Questions were asked about education, certification,previous experience, age, sex, size of hospital and department. (See Appendix3 for a sample of the Background Information Questionnaire,)
E. Survey Sample
Since the curriculum and instructional materials developed were to havenational applicability, respondents to the task analysis survey were selectedso as to reflect for the country as a whole a generalized pattern of medicaland nursing care in a hospital unit. A panel of 48 hospitals (which becamethe standard group sample) was designated from which respondents were to beselected for all or most of the occupational analyses undertaken in theAllied Health Professions Projects.
Medical facilities were surveyed in six designated geographical areas,each centered in a metropolis and with a radius of approximately 200 miles.Both urban and rural hospitals were included. The centers were Boston,Chicago, Birmingham, Denver, Los Angeles, and Seattle. Other criteria forselection included hospital size (number of beds) and type of facility(acute general hospital or Extended Care Facility). Each area sampleincluded two hospitals with more than 200 beds, two hospitals with 100 to199 beds, two hospitals with less than 100 beds, and two Extended CareFacilities. Additional requirements imposed on the selection of the sampleinstitutions were that they be accredited by the Joint Commission on Accredita-tion of the American Hospital Association, that they meet the requirementsfor Medicare, and they be willing to participate. (See Appendix 5 for listof hospitals surveyed.)
F. Method of Administering the Questionnaire
Each hospital was requested to provide a list of employees in theoccupational group under study and to appoint one employee as the surveyadministrator. For the occupation of Unit Management, where there was noposition specifically named "Unit Manager" or "Unit Administrator", theperson performing this function was designated by the hospital.
The survey administrator distributed a survey packet to each respondent.The packet included the questionnaire, a background information sheet, a set*of instructions, and an envelope. The questionnaires were self-administered.They were returned to the survey administrator in a sealed envelope and allcompleted survey packets were forwarded to UCLA for processing.
Assistance in the processing and reduction of survey and backgroundinformation data and computer analysis of these data was provided by theSurvey Research Center of the University of California, Los Angeles.Distributions were obtained for frequency, supervision, and difficultyresponses to all tasks listed on the survey for all of the occupationalgroups. The mean, mode, and median were calculated for each distributionin terms of the numerical scale values. The responses to all tasks listedon the survey by the Expert Panel were hand tabulated. Mode scores fordifficulty, criticality, and occupational level were calculated accordingto numerical scale values.
6
17
III. DATA ANALYSIS
A. Analysis of Background Information from Respondents
A total of 243 questionnaires was distributed to the Unit Administrationpersonnel. Responses were received in time for processing from 189 respondents,a response rate of 78 percent (See Table 1). Several additional questionnairesreceived after the final cut-off date were not included in the analysis ofthe data. Of 189 questionnaires received, six were considered inappropriatefor inclusion in the analysis of the data. Consequently, analysis will bebased on 183 useable responses.
One respondent's title was that of Secretary. Her place of employmentwas a facility of more than 200 beds and her responses indicated that hertasks related to typical office secretarial functions. She performed onlyeight percent of the total number of tasks listed. Since her responses werecompletely unrelated to the response patterns of other position-titles, heranswers were not included with responses of the other clerical personnel.
Another respondent, whose job title was Nurse Aide, performed onlythree percent of the total number of tasks listed. Since this response wasalso unrelated to any pattern of any other position-title, her responseswere not included in the summation of either clerical or managerial personnel.
The two Nursing Directors and the two Administrators were deemed inappro-priate for inclusion in this study because the parameters of their responsibilitiesextend for beyond the nursing unit of a hospital facility.
From the total list of 169 tasks, 22 tasks were performed by Directorsof Nursing or Administrators, but not by the clerical or managerial group.To have included these responses with those of the other managerial personnelwould have distorted and overextended curricula based on required task per-formance within the unit.
Table 1. NUMBER OF QUESTIONNAIRES DISTRIBUTED ANDNUMBER AND PERCENT RESPONSES RECEIVED,BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA-
Geographic Area
Number of Birming- LosQuestionnaires ham Boston Chicago Denver Angeles Seattle Total
Distributed 45 43 45 36 34 40 243
Returned 31 31 37 31 25 34 189
Percent returned 69 72 82 86 74 85 78
7
Fifteen different position titles were reported by the respondents.These were reduced to ten, based upon the similarity in job descriptions. Astudy of patterns of task performance* suggested a further clustering of theposition titles. They divided into either a clerical or a managerial pattern.
The clerical category comprised respondents whose job titles includedward clerk, unit clerk, ward secretary and unit secretary. The managerialcategory included respondents who had identified their occupational titles tobe LVN-LPN, Staff Nurse, Charge Nurse, Floor Manager, Coordinator, Head Nurse,Floor Supervisor, and Supervisor of Nursing (see Table 2).
Table 2
Respondents by Position-Title
Position Title Number Reporting
Ward Clerk,Unit Clerk
74
Ward Secretary 16
Secretary 1
Nurses' Aide 1
LPN or LVN 5
Head Nurse, I 56Charge Nurse
Floor Manager, 12Coordinator
Supervisor of Nursing,Floor Supervisor 19
Director of Nursing I 2
Administrator 1 2
Total 1 189
"Performance* will be used hereafter to designate both performance andsupervision.
8 19
Table 3
Respondents by Occupational Categoryand Geographic Area
Geographic Area
TotalOccupationalCategory Birmingham Boston Chicago Denver Los Angeles
.11.1Seattle
Total UnitMgt.Personnel
N= 29 N= 31 N= 35 N= 30 N= 25 N= 33 183
Clerical 12 14 19 15 11 21 92
Managerial 17 17 16 15 14 12 91
Of the usable responses, approximately 51 percent represented the clericalcategory; 49 percent were from the managerial category.
Further response to the questionnaire on personal characteristics is summarizedin Table 4, pages 13 through 15.
9
20
4Respondents by Type of Health Care Facility:
The distribution of respondents by hospital size shows that 45 percentof the survey sample came from large hospitals (200 or more beds).
Respondents by Health Care Setting:
The largest proportion (91%) of respondents in all categories was employedon the nursing station. Two percent were in the Emergency Room and 1.5 percentworked in an Extended Care Facility.
Nursing Station included all areas of patient care as well as thosedepartments which were listed as unit management, patient service, andpatient service coordination.
Respondents by Sex:
The overwhelming majority of unit administrative personnel is female.Of the 93 managerial respondents, 12 classified themselves as floor managersor patient service coordinators. Eight of these were males. Six of theeight male respondents designated as patient service coordinators are employedin a large hospital of 750 beds which has an ongoing formal patient servicecoordination organization. Another male respondent is from another largehospital, and is called "floor manager." The only other male respondent ina managerial position is the head nurse of his surgical department (Table 4).
Respondents by Age:
The total of 183 respondents excludes those six respondents whose question-naires were not utilized. The median age in the clerical group is 41 years;mode is in the classification of 20 - 29 years. The median age for both groupsis 38 years.
The age distribution of both clerical and managerial categories issimilar and evenly spread through ages 20 through 59. Neither of the occupa-tional groupings seems to indicate any age-specificity. Ages of males report-ing in the sample surveyed range from 23 to 30 years, with 26 years themedian age.
Respondents by Academic Education Completed:
Ninety-two percent of the clerical group had at least a high school orequivalent education; one person had earned a master's degree in BusinessAdministration; one had earned a bachelor's degree in Psychology. Eighty-twopercent of the managerial group had some college education. The bachelor'sdegrees were in Psychology, Biology, English, Education (History major),Political Science, Social Work, and Science. Six of the registered nurseswere graduates of baccalaureate programs. The only master's degree, held bya floor manager, was in Agronomy.
10
1
1Respondents by Technical or Training Programs Taken:
The clerks received on-the-job training, usually of less than one year.There were five who had received Ward Clerk certificates for a three-monthcourse. Other courses taken showed no relationship to the function of UnitManagement. Among the RN's, 89 percent were diploma school graduates.
Respondents by Salary:
Seven clerks and six managers were part-time employees. This partiallyaccounts for the seemingly low salaries in Table 4. The median salaries forclerks are scaled between $4,000 and $5,999 per annum. The median salariesfor managers are between $8,000 and $9,999 per annum.
Respondents by Certification, License, or Registration:
Among the clerical group, 89 percent had no certification. Among theeight other clerical respondents, five were certificated as having receiveda three-month Ward Clerk training. The other three had certifications inunrelated fields, such as cosmetology.
Among the managerial group, the RN's who were neither diploma schoolgraduates nor graduates of a baccalaureate program had received Associatelevel degrees. The other kinds of certification had no relationship tonursing or Unit Management functions.
Respondents by Previous Positions Held:
Of the 165 respondents reporting about previous positions, 54 persons(33%) had been employed in nursing or hospital-related occupations. In theremaining 67 percent, all had been previously employed in non-hospital-related activities.
The males in the managerial classification had been social workers,sales manager, food store manager, students, or had served with the armedforces. One female had been a station clerk for two years before progressingto her present position as a Patient Service Coordinator.
Respondents by Present Position:
The respondent population appeared to be unusually stable, with a highproportion employed at their present facilities for more than two years.
In the clerical group, 81 percent of the sample had been in the presentposition less than five years. The median is three years in the present position.In the managerial group, 80 percent of the sample had been in the presentposition less than five years. The median is four years in the present position.Most of the male respondents were from a facility which had adopted the "unitmanager" system only two and a half years earlier. Male respondents rangedfrom one month to two and a half years in their present position. The mediannumber of years in the present position for male respondents was one year andtwo months.
11
Table 4.
DESCRIPTION OF RESPONDENTS BY OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORY(By Size of Hospital and Area of Patient Care)
Occupational CategoryClerical ManagerialN=90 N=93
TotalN=183
Size and Type of Health Care Facility
Acute General Hospital
To 99 - Beds
100 - 199 Beds
200 Plus
Extended Care Facility
16 22
28 25
44 39
*2 7
38
53
83
9
Area of Patient Care
Hospital Nursing Station
Hospital Emergency Room
Extended Care Facility
No Answer
83 80
2 2
1 2
6 7
163
4
3
13
(Continued)
12
23
II
1
Table 4. (Continued)
DESCRIPTION OF RESPONDENTS BY OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORY(By Sex, Age, and Academic Education)
Item
Occupational CategoryClerical ManagerialN=90 N=93
TotalN=183
Sex
Male
Female
1
89
8'
85
9
174
Age
Under 20 Years
20 - 29 Years
30 - 39 Years
40 - 49 Years
50 - 59 Years
60 and Over
No Answer
3
20
19
27
19
3
6
1
33
22
18
12
3
1
4
53
41
45
31
6
7
Academic Education
Less than High School
High School or Equivalent
Some College (no degree)
Associate Degree
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Other
No Answer
8 0
47 14
20 24
0 6
12 1
1 1
9 34
6 1
8
61
44
6
13
2
43
7
(Continued)
-13.
241
Table 4. (Continued)
DESCRIPTION OF RESPONDENTS BY OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORY(By Technical or Training Programs, Certification,
License, Registration, and Salary)
Item
Occupational CategoryClerical ManagerialN=90 N=93
TotalN=183
Technical or Training Programs
On-the-Job
Military Courses
Manufacturer's Courses
Vocational Schools
Certificates or Diplomas
Other Courses
None or No Answer
17
1
1
7
8
10
48
3
5
0
4
73
3
3
20
6
1
11
81
13
51
Certification, License, or Registration
R.N.
L.P.N. or L.V.N.
Other
None or No Answer
0 73
2 5
8 4
82 9
73
7
12
91
Salary
Less than $2,000
$2,000 - $3,999
$4,000 - $5,999
$6,000 - $7,999
$8,000 Plus
No Answer
1 1
35 4
47 6
4 32
1 46
2
39
53
36
47
6
(Continued)14
25
Table 4. (Continued)
DESCRIPTION OF RESPONDENTS BY OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORY(By Previous Position Held, andYears in Present Position)
Item
Occupational CategoryClerical ManagerialN=90 N=93
TotalN=183
Previous Positions Held
Nursing
Hospital-Related
Non-Hospital Related(excluding studentsand military)
Student
Military
None
No Answer
22 23
7 2
37 10
3 16
0 2
17 26
4 14
Years in Present Position
45
9
47
19
2
43
18
Less than 1 Year
1 - 2 Years
2 - 5 Years
5 - 10 Years.
10 Plus
No Answer
16
27
30
13
4
0
24
27
24
15
0
3
40
54
54
28
4
3
15
4B. Description of Statistics Used
A special aim of this report is to determine which task activities aredifferentiated by occupational category. Another issue is the appropriatenessof personnel to the adequate performance of the task. The report relies uponthe judgment of its Expert Panel concerning the appropriate level of difficulty.The dimension of "criticality" is included to arrive at a preliminary assess-ment of those tasks which, in the experts' opinion, are critical to the efficientand effective operation of unit management. It serves to pinpoint those taskswhich require a given level of training for competent performance.
The mode (the scale value most frequently occurring for each task) wasused in preference to the mean as an indicator of the responses. In manyinstances it was found that the shape of a distribution was such that itsmean would not be representative of any respondents. Essentially, most ofthe data clustered around the modal value. It is interesting to note that,in many cases, mode and median (the mid-value which has just as many casesbelow is as above it) turned out to be the same. Whenever there was abimodal distribution, the upper modal value was taken. It was believedthat using the upper mode value when a choice was necessary, would act asa safeguard in assessing behavioral objectives for task performance.
The response to the question for each task could be that the person%either performed the task or supervised the task. When the results weretabulated, the numbers either performing or supervising were added together.This decision was based on the rationale that for purposes of developmentof curricula and instructional material, familiarity with the task was asessential for supervision as for performance. Further analysis wouldprovide evaluation criteria to establish acceptable performance standardsfor each task. The results of the occupational analysis are described interms of the following task parameters:
1. Percentage of respondents who either perform or supervise the task.
2. Modal frequency by respondents who perform or supervise the tasks.(See Appendix 4A for scale.)
3. Modal value of the difficulty ratings of the task by the respondentsas well as by the Expert Paiiel.
4. Modal value of the criticality rating of the task by the ExpertPanel. (See Appendix 4B for scale.)
5. The modal value of the appropriate level of occupational categoryas determined by the Expert Panel.
C. Compiling Data on Performance by Clerical and Managerial Personnel
Tabulation of tasks performed by clerical or managerial personnel wasmade in terms of whether the job was performed or supervised. This frequencyis reported by percentages in each classification according to five divisions.(See Figures A-(1) through B-(7), on pages 20 through 51).
16
427.
1. 0%; these tasks would obviously be excluded from curriculumconsideration.
2. 1-24%: this classification was intended to identify those tasksthat seemed to be related to specific procedures exclusiveto a particular hospital.
3. 25-49%: tasks performed at this level of frequency are currentlyand generally practiced in sufficient numbers to beconsidered common to many facilities and to warrantdevelopment of educational units for use in the appropriateeducational setting, on the job or in the classroom.
4. 50-74%: the tasks that are performed with this high degree offrequency are considered to be practices common to amajority of health care facilities. Teaching programsshould include such tasks.
5. 75%+: the preceding rationale applies to this classification.Additionally, however, the high commonality of performanceadds to the consideration of priority in the developmentof instructional materials.
D. Task List Exclusions and Additions
Of the 169 tasks listed on the survey, only one was not performed byany of the personnel working on the unit. This task related to the utiliza-tion of computer systems for research data analysis. The group of 22 taskswhich fell below the 25 percent performance level by either the clerical ormanagerial occupational groups is excluded from the development of a nationalcurriculum. These tasks were, however, performed by Nursing Directors andHospital Administrators.
Since none of the questionnaires contained any additions, the assumptionwas made that the original task inventory was complete.
E. Distribution of Tasks by Occupational Category
The total list of tasks was examined to identify the common tasksperformed by managers and clerks. There were 98 common tasks in this list.The examination also identified tasks performed uniquely by each group. Itappeared that the clerk did not perform any task which was not also done bythe manager. The manager performed 49 tasks not done by the clerk.
17
. 28
IV RESULTS
The questionnaire was divided into two section: Clerical Functionsand Administrative Functions. In each section there were several sub-headings.Each sub-heading with appropriate tasks was tabulated and recorded into thefollowing charts by Performance, Frequency, and Difficulty as reported bySurvey Respondents, and Difficulty, Criticality, and Occupational Level ratedby the Expert Panel.
19
29
FIGURE A-(1
)CLERICAL FUNCTIONS -- RECORD KEEPING
A.
CLERICAL FUNCTIONS
(1)
Reco
rd K
eepi
ng
Performed or Supervised
by r
espo
nden
tsFrequency
as rated by respondents
IDifficulty
rated
by r
espo
nden
tsand
Expert Panel
Criticality
'
rated
by E
xper
t Pa
nel
only
Occupatio
nal
Level
judg
ed b
yExpert Panel
00 es.
"1-1
apeV
CA
1.7.Vr
+er J1
6in
cv
In
r's
33
11
23
12
34
5only
1.Maintain unit census record.
6/.
,
.1%/
I:
,1H'
!!:1W
k:H1
1!:M
-
1MI
IFA
I/Ar
nii
irui
,,Hih
11:
JIIii;:;
2.Ma nta n list of new admissions,
transfe
rs,
and
disc
harg
es.
IIIKAIVZ059.,
11M. 07
72MIMI I Mim
i111II=1111
=w
i0:0
10:6
'!!!11
1-:!
I
3.Maintain check-in and check-out sheet
for
loca
tion
of
pati
ents
.MENEM=
Wir
elta
dd1=1::::
Iff
4.Maintain check-in and check-out sheet
for location of patient charts and
records.
Mill
,
girAor
,11
,,,1
1111
1119iiiirdin
MINIIMMEM
agra
itZOr 1.
11:;:!;:111111111:,ili
IIIIMMIMI
-5.
Maintain food tray service check list.
iliMMiNiMi
r4r
farl
draA
C
#74/
I5117
II
6.Provide information to appropriate
departments about "critical" patients.
MIMI=',xi')
igrAirr
i
11:U
1111
111
11.1
1,11
.',
1,2nowr
.,,....,
ii!i!i"1.
.,!..
MI11
111E
115
Ca
7.Assemble patients' records and forms,
and
othe
r ne
cess
ary
data
.11
/111
1.11
i
Wir
raMr
di
111.
111M
IMM
IIII
Wgi
a:
tAI:05
00'
.il
ki,i
1h,H
1111
X,
waa
aB.
Write in headings on appropriate forms.
, . . :.. , r. .4
I I I I
....II,
,..) ,,Ji.
1111
iIIIM
IlliIi
IIIIII
i111
1,11
1.11
11,
,
MII=MMII.
drofrfordi
9.stamp patient forms with imprinter.
IMMININ
mama'
///:#
.11
!!!".:
IliMMEMMM
ara
10.
Graph or chart information onto
appropriate f
orm.
MilrarWrifir
'0 %
/4 0
'ii.
J1:1
1111
'111
1m
iIIIM
INEIM
11.
Keep fi
les
in o
rder
.1M
MIN
NI1
1m
ord
dree
dnUt01
1I; " 'III
1111
1111
HWH11111;.JCI
alf
alfa
12.
Write tags and labels for specimens.
MMI MEN MI
igat
4
ri rrr
i ei 11
1111
Ili
iiiIIIIIIIIIIIiiiidiiiIIII
t eac
oiii
13.
Check cards for narcotic renewals.
MEI
/rei
r'm
inim
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
111W
IMEMENI
14.
Compil
e na
rcot
ic s
umma
ry s
heet
s.
illi
ffil
lill
L5.
Labe
l tr
ays,
equ
ipme
nt,
cupb
oard
s.
Wirdfla
!IIIII
KEY TO SYMBOLS:
= mode
val
ues;
NMI
= c
leri
cal
resp
o:Ic
i,,n
ts:A
/Vi,
man
ager
tal
tsre
nden
tN:1
1111
11 =
ren
po:i
sPexurt ln
,!1:
410,
- no
n-un
it p
ftrs
onnt
:1
I
FIGURE A-(1
)CLERICAL FUNCTIONS -- RECORD KEEPING (Continued)
sue
A.
CLERICAL FUNCTIONS
(1) Record Keeping
(Co
ntin
ued)
Performed or Supervised
by respondents
Frequency '
d bspondents
as rate
by
Dif
ficu
lty
rated by respondents
and
Expert Panel
Crit
ical
ity
arated
by E
xper
t Pa
nel
only
Occupational
Level
judg
ed b
yExpert Panel
co
eg,
CAer
mr
N1
1in
.-1
N
a r- I c) u+
+ op tri
r`
.i
31
31
1I
12
31
23
4only
16.
Prepare patie
nt c
harg
e fo
rms.
irlaff
I
'now05,
MEM
17.
Transcribe doctors' orders onto
appropria
te r
ecor
ds.
tff
IfiM
IIIN
INIII
IINIII
IIMIM
Ind
18.
Record appropriate information in
Kardex.
grtarff
t11
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
111
min
19.
Sign for packages and flowers.
lift'
=N
INA
20.
Duplicate forms as needed (photocopy).
./,'
q10
5,50
%i
iiii
,WHIN
21.
Report and record lost and found
articles.
=III
IIN11
1111
4111
111
IIIIII
IIM
22.
Maintain call roster of doctors.
////=
MUNININ11
1111
11
23.
Maintain log of long-distance phone
call
s.
Mad
:12
1111
111
III
24.
Maintain continuing file of information
for annual rep
orts
.11
1111
1=
1111
1111
1111
1111
INI
?VA
25.
Obt
ain
cons
ent
sign
atur
es.
'2,././
IrA1
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
111
',Z.
26.
Claim library books from patients
upon di
scha
rge.
....,
1111
11
27.
Deli
ver
.
Wad
arar
gA17
,050
:
Orii
iiii
IIII
NII
.
MI=
28.
Maintain supply of stationery and
writ
ing
mate
rial
s.
tilifill
1
Or f
1111
111
29.
Clean up around nursing station.
ilifilif
NSW
1=II
IIIN
MB
30.
Maintain and file unit correspondence
and
dire
ctiv
es.
I1
II
Mffillliiiiiiiiii
MIIM
KEY
TO
SY
MBO
LS:
= mode
val
ues:
1MM
= clerical respoodonts:Wi!= managerial ro.q,ondoots;
1111
111
= re
mors
e 1,
7 ex
port
pat
e1:4
11=
non-
unit
uor
sonn
,21
A-(1) Clerical Functions -- Record Keeping
Description of Function
The 30 tasks comprising this functional area are related to the mainte-nance and production of records for patient care and details of administrativepractices.
Performance
Of all the tasks in the group, Task 13 (check for narcotic renewals)and Task 14 (compile narcotic summary sheet) were the two tasks reported asperformed by managerial but not clerical personnel.*
Task 23 (maintain log of long distance phone calls), Task 24 (maintaincontinuing file of information for annual reports) and Task 26 (claim librarybooks from patients upon discharge) fell below the 25 percent level fcr bothgroups of respondents performing.
The remaining 25 tasks in Function A-(1) were performed by both managerialand clerical personnel.
Frequency
With the exception of Task 15 (label trays, equipment, cupboards) andTask 22 (maintain call roster of doctors), all tasks were rated as beingdone more than once a week by the clerical group. With the single exceptionof Task 22, the managers reported tasks being done more frequently than oncea week.
Difficulty
Most of the tasks in this function were rated at Level 1, "easy." Nonewas rated above Level 2, "moderate," by any of the survey participants.
The Expert Panel rated Task 6 (provide information to appropriatedepartments about "critical" patients), Task 17 (transcribe doctor's ordersinto appropriate records), and Task 18 (record appropriate information inKardex), at Level 2 but rated all the others at Level 1, "easy." Theclerical group concurred with experts' rating for Task 17 and 24 but regardedthe other tasks in this function as "easy." The managerial group rated alltasks in the function as "easy."
*Non-performance is hereafter defined as performance reported by lessthan 25 percent of respondents in each category. For explanation,seePage 17.
22
:
1.
I
1
1
Criticality
The Expert Panel rated Task 9 (stamp patient forms with imprinter),Task 17, (transcribe doctors' orders onto appropriate records), and Task 18(record appropriate information in Kardex), at Level 5 in criticality. Ofthe nine tasks rated at Level 4, eight were concerned with the obtainingand accurate recording of information, and the one other at this level wasTask 6 (provide information to appropriate departments about "critical"patients). Only 10 of this group of 30 tasks were rated below Level 2.
Occupational Level Judged by Expert Panel
Two tasks, Task 24 (maintain continuing file of information for annualreports) and Task 25 (obtain consent signatures) were judged to be managerial;all others were designated as belonging to the clerical level.
General Remarks
Forty percent of the tasks from the total inventory judged by the ExpertPanel to be performed by the clerical occupational level were found in FunctionA-(1) Clerical Functions -- Record Keeping.
The high criticality rating of Function A-(1) by the Expert Panelstressed the necessity for requiring high levels of acceptable studentperformance in the design of the instructional material.
23
FIGURE A-(2
)CLERICAL FUNCTIONS
-- C
O:11
1:IC
ATIO
NS
A CLERICAL TASKS
(2)
Comm
unic
atio
ns
Performed or Supervised
by respondents
Frequency
as
rate
d by
resp
onde
nts
Dif
ficu
lty
rated
by r
espo
nden
tsand
Expert Panel
Criticality
rated
by E
xper
t Pa
nel
only
Occupatio
nal
Level
judg
ed b
yExpert Panel
only
0.*
er c..4 1
.-1
co
cr%
er 1 cv
00 yr+
e- ein
ct u,1
23
12
34
5,......
1.Receive and deliver telephone messages
to unit
per
sonn
el.
MINN
1 lial
sesNili
..
101111111
'FtWIN ra
1111
111M
=11
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
=111111E11111111111
111111
2.Info
rm p
atie
nts
of c
alls
rec
eive
d.
O-
gam
ma
ammo
3.Page doctors and other hospital
personnel.
11 111
111111
1111111111111
4.Answer the intercom and relay messages
to unit
per
sonn
el.
WO
WWI
Warif
fla
=11
111/
1NEM
5.Announce the close of visiting hours.
ill
4111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
6.Operate pneumatic tube.
a11
1111
mm
ulm
i11
1111
11.
Operate dumbwaiter and transveyor.
Wag
1 1
I11
1111
1111
11111101111111111111
1111
111
'/ /A
IR
8.Question physicians about patients.
///
16In
=Im
om
um
mm
int
'A/7
.ra
retin
g9.
Answer questions asked by unit
personnel.
lit
=11
1111
1111
1II
HII
1111
1111
1111
1/./
t/.irlartagra
10.
Relay information about unit activities
--
.
IM 1
1111
1111
111
1111
1111
f///
/.w
isifir
mififirarrarig
11.
Visit and interview patients.
///
111111111M
1111111111111
1111
111
Z/ZZ
12.
Info
rm v
isit
ors
of h
ospi
tal
rule
s.
fir
rr
111
i11
1111
1.
Imo
I.?.
Dir
ect
visi
tors
to
appr
opri
ate
room
s.
WO
W WM
=1111111111111
1111
11M
IIIM
Wadi
14.
Locate doctors or nurses as requested
by visitors.
Or 1
I1
111
1111
11
i111
1111
1111
1
t1111111
15.
Requisition meals and nourishment from
Dietary.
KEY TO SY
MBOL
S:v.m.:;1; 0. con -ur.i
sonr.:1
= m
ode
val
ues;
1111
111=
cle
rical
res.!
crrj
er.tc.
;rt
z; o
rr:lr
:r0.:s
:111
1111
1re
s:
A. CLERICAL TASKS
(2)
Comm
unic
atio
ns (
Cont
inue
d)
16.
Requis
itio
n la
bora
tory
ser
vice
s.
FIGURE A-(2
)CLERICAL FUNCTIONS -- COMMUNICATIONS (Continued)
Performed or Supervised
by r
espo
nden
tscr
aa
.o
.CM
'.
r-
IN I .IIN
r-
Frequency
as rated by respondents
Dif
ficu
lty
rated
by r
espo
nden
tsand
Ex)e
rt P
anel
i.:r
itic
alit
yrated
by L
xper
t Pa
nel
only
12
equis tion sery cs
rem P arin
acy.
18.
Requisition the services of House-
keeping.
19.
Requisition services from Laundry.
20.
Request repairs from Maintenance.
OMMOINEMENOMMEM
'gra(
21.
Request equipment from Central Supply.
22.
Request supplies from Storeroom.
23.
Give information to other departments.
24.
Communicate with government agencies.
25.
Maintain unit reading materials.
26.
Distribute reports, manuals, and
directives.
27.
Run errands to other departments.
KEY TO SYMBOLS:
31
23
45
occupatio
nal
Level
judg
ed b
yLxpert Panel
only
1111
11 1
1111
11 1
1111
1
M11
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
HIM
1MM
MI"
1111
1111
1111
1
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1
1111
1;11
1111
1
II
= mode
= cle
rica
l re
spon
dent
s:Wi
e.=
mana
geri
al r
,.?s
?,o;
:den
t:sz
nIll
fil
respons,,
expl:rt
rt.i
ron-uli
t ;,
:ers
onne
l
A-(2) Clerical Functions -- Communications
Description of Function
The 27 tasks in this functional area include inter-unit and intra-unitcommunication for the patient, services, and visitors.
Performance
Task 5 (announce the close of visiting hours) and Task 24 (communicatewith government agencies) were the only two tasks performed by neither clerksnor managers. Most of the other tasks (13 in number) were performed by morethan 75 percent of the clerical and managerial respondents.
Frequency
Tasks 1 through 18 were performed at equally high frequency by managersand clerks.
With the exception of Task 24 (communicate with government agencies),all other tasks in this function were performed more frequently than oncea month, most of them being done several times a day.
Difficulty
Clerks rated all the tasks in this function at Level 1, "easy."Managers concurred with the clerical group except for Task 24 (communicatewith government agencies) which they rated at Level 2, "moderate." TheExpert Panel was at variance with the unit personnel for 13 tasks whichwere rated by the experts as "moderately difficult."
Criticality
Tasks 1, 2, 8, 16, 17, 23, and 24, having to do with delivery ofmessages, obtaining information from patients, requisitioning certainsupplies, and giving information, were rated more critical than the othertasks. Tasks 3, 5, 13, and 25, dealing with paging doctors, announcingclosing hours, directing visitors and maintaining reading materials,emerged as the least critical.
Occupational Level Judged by Expert Panel
AcCording to the experts, Task 27 (run errands to other departments)should be performed by neither clerks nor managers but by a speciallydesignated messenger service.
Of the remaining 26 tasks, 13 were to be performed by clerks and theother 13 by the managers.
General Remarks
Although the Expert Panel recommended distinct personnel levels forperformance, in actual prictice the two groups reported that they performedthe tasks, and did so with equal frequency. The assignment of task responsi-bilities to distinct personnel levels may become more noticeable as thispattern of hospital organization becomes more prevalent.
The preparation of educational materials for this function should coverthe mechanics of communication, such as operating pneumatic tube, transveyor,and telephone, requesting services from other hospital departments, andrelaying information. Certain of these could involve judgmental considerations.
27
Is)
03
FIGURE A-(3
)CLERICAL FUNCTIONS -- PATIENT CENTERED ACTIVITIES
A. CLERICAL FUNCTIONS
(3)
Pati
ent-
Center
ed A
ctiv
itie
s
Performed or Supervised
by respondents
Frequency
s rated
by r
espo
nden
ts.1
Dif
ficu
lt:
rated
by r
espo
nden
tsand
Expert Panel
crit
ical
ity
rated
by E
xper
t Pa
nel
only
J
Occupatio
nal
Level
'ju
dged
by
Expert Panel
only
)
o.a.
C4 I
.-1
co
CA
.a.
I in CNI
co
V.
r--
I gmLn
+ 00 Ln4
32
l1
23
12
34
5
1.Greet and welcome new patient.
2 3 2 E 2 2 I r a l
III.MIIII
1 I 11 I
1111
1111
11
2.Notify appropriate unit personnel upon
adm
issi
on o
f ne
w pa
tien
t.Wirigratail
/./
/I
I I
111111
1111
111
3.Make
bed
ass
ignm
ent.
I li I i
1111
1111
111
1111
1111
1000
011
/ZZ,
4.Make and apply patient identification
tags.
;71
7,71
099
MI
Prr
. e
l1 1 1
I
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
111
1111
11
5.Inform patient of hospital procedures.
///////.
66i f
t13'
1111
1115
1111
1101
111
',e/
./6.
Receive and store patient's valuables.
mili
mim
mil
1111
1"A
i,ar
gra
liffliff
pliu
mm
usl
in;
7.Orient patient to his room and
roommates.
1111
1111
1111
0111
11
//1
11II
III
IIIN
IIIII
IIII
II8.
Record admission of new patient on
appropria
te u
nit
reco
rds.
iMai
itag
ai9.
Make appointments for patient.
/ /
// / / /
11I I
IIIIIIIIII
illt.cialiii
1111
1111
101
10.
Requisition physician consultations at
doct
or's
req
uest
.
imow
p I
i I
IIIIIIIII
1111
1111111111111111il
lili
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
11.
Collect and forward transfer patient's
medical records to receiving unit.
,./.
/./.
/".
////
)ii
IIIIIIIIII
12.
Record patient transfer on appropriate
unit records.
.//
/ ,
//Z.',/,'
I 11 I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
NMI
13.
Alert receiving unit to be sure a bed
is ready for a transfer patient.
71/1/ wag
// //
MOM M
itai
iii
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1
-
e1
1 III
1011
1111
111
1111
1011
1111
1111
11'/Z
e14
.Receive '.rans
fer
pati
ent
comi
ng f
rom
anothe
r un
it.
IIIIIIIIMMIIII
artragf
II III
15.
Receive notification of discharge
orde
r./ / / //
KEY TO SY
MBOL
S:= mode
val
ues:
MONI
V, clerical respondents:OW/= managerial resionaents:MMIF -es! Ons:, IY ex!
art panel:
410
= no
n-un
it p
erso
nnel
FIGURE A-(3
)CLERICAL FUNCTIONS -- PATIENT CENTERED ACTIVITIES (Continued)
A.
CLERICAL FUNCTIONS
(3) Patient Centered Activities (Continued)
Performed or Supervised
by respondents
as rated
.i
Frequency
by r
espo
nden
ts
3I
Dif
ficu
lty
ratd by respondents
and
Expert Panel
Criticality
rated
by E
xper
t Pa
nel
only
Occupatio
nal
Level
judg
ed b
yExpert Pane:
rr C3 1 .-1
00
'4
xr.
II
trt
0ty
WI
+ 0 mil r-1
23
ronly
16.
Notify appropriate departments of
patie
nt d
isch
arge
.WM
Magill"
illiMMENO
II I
1111
111
111
1111
11
T
17.
Arrange transportation or escort
servic
e fo
r pa
tien
t.ad
raeadada
I
1111
111
1111
111
1111
18.
Inform patient of discharge procedure
and other pertinent information.
riff
(maim
11 1
1111
1111
111
=1 irs laartra.
19.
Return patient's valuables upon
disc
harg
e.lir
11
Idi1
1111
111111
111111111111
e.,/,
1.-
Walf
aal
20.
Make record of unused medications upon
disc
harg
e or
pat
ient
.r
I11111
11111
11111
ENE
agfa
ira
.
111111
111111
111111
/MN
21.
Collect and forward patient's
prescription drugs to Pharmacy.
KIM
MOWN
11
111111
11111111114t
411
22.
Give patient his prescriptions and
drug
s up
on d
isch
arge
.
rr1
IIiii
iii11
111
1111
11II
III,
23.
Note discharge on appropriate unit
records.
,Vil
ialV
d
M(
Kfli
galtr
a1
(1111
1'11
111
1111
1111
1111
124.
Send patient's charts and forms to
Medical Records Department upon
sliac
hara
r..or
arom
a11
1111
1111
111
1111
25.
Notify patient's family of discharge.
rall
1111
1111
M11
1111
1111
111
1111
1111
111
26.
Locate and inform the patient's
phy
sici
an o
f pa
tien
t's
deat
h.MI ZZ.r/1
01111
l
II 1
d11
1111
1111
111
1111
1111
1111
1111
127
.Inform patient's family of patient's
death.
MI.Z.J
I
1111
111
1111
4111
111
MIM
E28
.Notif
y ap
prop
riat
e de
part
ment
s, s
uch
asAdmitting and Business of patient's
deat
h.WarM
%//
I II
I11111111
1111
1111
111
1111
1111
1111
1111
111
M.
29.
Obtain autopsy and consent forms.
tirMIMI".
I1
1I I
4111
1111
111
1111
1111
1111
111
111
eZZ
,30
.Obtain a death certificate.
KEY TO SY
MMS:
* -= mode values; = clerical resp(ndents:Vd!O= managerial respondents:1111111
.response
exertr Panel;
non-unit
per
sonn
el-
FIGURE A-(3
)CLERICAL FUNCTIONS -- PATIENT CENTERED ACTI
VITIES (Continued)
A.
CLERICAL FUNCTIONS
(3) Patient Cent
ered
Act
ivit
ies
(Con
tinu
ed)
31.
Requis
itio
n a
shro
ud p
ack.
42.
Collect and identify patient's
belongings upon patient's death.
33.
Record patient's death on appropriate
records.
34.
Meet and escort funeral director.
35.
Contact attorney, barber, insurance
agent, religious personnel, etc. on
_patie
nt's
beh
alf,
as
requ
este
d.36
.Obt
ain
television set, reading
material, cigarettes, and other comfort
0for patient.
37.
Contact bi
llin
g of
fice
on
beha
lf o
f.patient.
38.
Distribute patient menus.
39.
Go on daily rounds.
40.
Control boisterous patient and/or
visitor.
41.
Respond
to p
atie
nt c
ompl
aint
s.
Performed or Superis,%1
by respondents
00 0 C3
Frequency
as rated by respondents
ZZ
1,Iffi-zulty
by r
espo
na,
and
!:x .ort Panel
11
2
I1
I d
I II
II III
1(11
1111
1111
1
101
11id
1 1
In'
1 11
I
KEY TO SYMBOLS:
criticality
Ated
by E
xper
t Pa
nel
only
occupattonal
Level
judg
ed b
yExpert Panel
only
31
23
4S
1111
111
1111
1111
1111
1N
EM
IIIIII
I111
111
1111
11Ze
Z,
1111
111
1111
1111
111
1111
1111
1111
1111
111
'///.
1111
1111
1111
111
1111
HM
I11
1111"III
'IM
MO
DM
1111
11N
EM
1111
1111
1111
1111
111
1111
1111
1111
1111
11///
111
1111
IIIII
II11
1111
1111
1111
1111
1III
IIMW
.
= mode values:MIMI= clerical rspondonts:,%/ie:= manaqcrial 1-spo:idents; MIMI = resonne
i:12
1:41
1= n
on-u
nit
pers
onne
l
VA-(3) Clerical Functions -- Patient-Centered Activities
Description of Area
The 41 tasks in this function ere all related to patient-centeredactivities from time of admission to the unit until time of discharge. Theyinvolve the non-clinical tasks that pertain to the patient's comfort, safety,and care.
Performance
Task 30 (obtain death certificate) was not performed by clerks ormanagers. Task 26 (inform patient's family of patient's death), Task 32(meet and escort funeral director), and Task 39 (go on daily rounds) wereperformed by managerial personnel but not by clerks. All of the remaining35 tasks were performed by clerks and managers. A higher percentage ofclerks than managers performed Task 16 (notify appropriate department ofpatient discharge), Task 22 (give patient his prescriptions and drugs upondischarge), Task 24 (send patient's charts and forms to Medical RecordsDepartment upon discharge), and Task 38 (distribute patient menus).
Frequency
Death-related activities were least frequently performed--less frequentlythan once a month. Task 37 (contact billing office on behalf of patient), wasperformed at Level 2 by the clerical group but at Level 1 by the managerialgroup. Task 40 (control boisterous patient and/or visitor) was performed atLevel 2 by the managerial group but at Level 1 by the clerical group. Allother tasks were performed at Levels.3 or 4.
Difficulty
Clerks and managers gave identical ratings for all but Task 27 (inform,.patient's family of patient's death). This one was rated moderately difficultby the managerial group and difficult by the clerical group. Two other taskswere rated "moderate" and the remaining 38 tasks were rated "easy" by bothgroups. The Expert Panel rated ten tasks at a higher level of difficultythan did the survey respondents.
Occupational Level Judged by Expert Panel
Task 7 (orient patient to his room and roommates) , Task 22 (give patienthis prescriptions and drugs upon discharge), and Task 27 (inform patient'sfamily of patient's death), were designated by the Expert Panel as nursingfunctions. The experts also recommended that Task 27 be most appropriatelyperformed by the patient's doctor. Task 38 (distribute patient menus) wassuggested as most appropriately belonging to the dietary department.
Twelve tasks were judged as managerial tasks whereas the 25 remainingtasks were considered as clerical.
31
41
Where the experts recommended that tasks be performed at a manageriallevel, the percentage of the managerial group performing the task was ineach case higher than that of the clerical group. This was reported for12 tasks. Task 4 (make and apply patient identification tags), Task 15(receive notification of discharge order), Task 26 (locate and inform patient'sphysician of patient's death), and Task 28 (notify appropriate departmentssuch as admitting and busineie office of patient's death) were tasks judgedby the Expert Panel as those which should be performed by the unit clerk,whereas the report showed a higher percentage of managerial personnel performingthem.
General Remarks
The general headings which include all the tasks in this function are:Direct Patient Contact, Handling Patient Records and Belongings, and ActivitiesRelated to Death of Patient.
Of the 41 tasks listed under the function of patient-centered activities,only two were designated as most appropriately being handled by the nurse.All other tasks were designated by the Expert Panel as managerial or clericalduties. Nursing training, then, would not seem prerequisite for performingthem.
32
42
FIGURE A-(4
)CLERICAL FUNCTIONS -- SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT
.
A.
CLERICAL FUNCTIONS
(4)
Supp
lies
and
Equ
ipme
nt
Performed or Supervised
by respondents
Frequency '
as rated by respondents
Dif
ficu
lty
rated by respondents
and
Exie
rt P
anel
Criticality
raced
by E
xper
t. P
anel
only
occupatio
nal
Level
judg
ed b
yExpert Panel
only
I
a
12
31
23
45
'
1.Specify the type of equipment and
supplies needed on the unit.
11
111
1111
1111
111
1111
-
1111
1111
1111
t'
I'2.
Establ sh standard quantit es o
supplies.
11 I
Imm
o,H
im11
111
mull
7/./.
.3.
Make rounds to discover repair and
rede
cora
ting
nee
ds.
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
e/z,
4.Insure that maintenance schedules for
equip
ment
are
met
.1
111
1111
1111
111
1111
111111111Li
/././
5.Evaluate and approve requisitions for
supplies and equipment.
1 11
111
1111
1111
MI 11
1111
atm
imm
VW
w.
'11
1II
IIII
IIH
411N
111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1.././
Z6.
Purchase supplies and equipment.
7.Check receipt of new supplies and
equip
ment
.1
1 1
1.
1111
111
1111E1111111
///.
4
111111111
1111111111111.111111
e/Z
8.Assign and list location of supplies
and
equi
pmen
t.
9.Place supplies and equipment in
assigned positions.
11 I
1111
1111
1111
1110
111
10.
Maintain inventory of supplies and
equipment.
11 I
1M1111111111
111111
1111
111
e/./
1.
I II
1111
11-
e/./
,11.
Maintain record of equipment loaned
to or bo
rrow
ed f
rom
othe
r ar
eas.
12.
Maintain linen supplies.
1=1r
1111
1111
1111
1111
ffim
mi-..,
13.
Maintain a doctor's drawer (for medica
suppli
es).
WI
111111.11111
111111
1111
111
KEY
'10
SYM
BOLS
:=
mo
de v
alue
s; M
il =
cler
ical
resp
=reJpoude
ws;
1111
111=
res
pons
e !.
.; e
xpor
t1,
1nel
All=
non
-uni
t pe
rson
nel
A-(4) Clerical Functions -- Supplies and Equipment
Description of Area
The 13 tasks listed in this function consist of control and supply ofmaterial needs for the unit. They include such activities as distributionand maintenance of supplies and equipment.
Performance
Unit personnel did not perform Task 6 (purchase supplies and equipment).Managers but not clerks performed Task 3 (make rounds to discover repair andredecorating needs), Task 4 (insure that maintenance schedules for equipmentare met), Task 5 (evaluate and approve requisitions for supplies and equipment),and Task 12 (maintain linen supplies). Both managers and clerks performedall the remaining tasks in this function.
Frequency
Task 5 (evaluate and approve requisitions for supplies and equipment)was the most frequently performed task in this function. It is done bythe clerical group.
Difficulty
All the tasks in this function were rated as easy by clerks and managersalike; the experts concurred with them on six tasks and rated the remainingseven tasks at a higher level of difficulty.
Criticality
Experts rated the purchase and inventory of supplies, including linenand medical supplies, as more critical than other tasks in this function.Task 11 (maintain record of equipment loaned to or borrowed from other areas)was rated as the least critical.
Occupational Level Judged by Expert Panel
Most tasks in this function were judged to be managerial tasks. Onlytwo tasks in the list, Task 9 (place supplies and equipment in assignedpositions), and Task 13 (maintain a doctor's drawer for medical supplies),were desigfiated as clerical tasks.
The occupational level performing four tasks conformed with the expertrecommendation.
General Remarks
Function A-(4) covers the determination of back-up supplies and equipmentneeded on the unit and the flow of these materials in order to provide patientcare. It is essentially a managerial function involving a high degree ofjudgment; the clerical group participates by implementing the decisions.
34
44:
I(
This organizational experience on the unit might be considered as providingthe manager with a background for further advancement into the higher admini-strative functions of the hospital.
35
. 45
FIGURE A-(5
)CLERICAL FUNCTIONS -- SAFETY AND SANI
TATION
A.
CLERICAL FUNCTIONS
(5)
Safe
ty a
nd S
anit
atio
n
v
Performed or SupervIoed
by respondents
Frequency
as rated
by r
espo
nden
ts s
Dif
ficu
lty
rated
by r
espo
nden
tsand
Expert Panel
Criticality
rated
by E
xper
t Pa
nel
only
Occupatio
nal
Level
judg
ed b
yExpert Panel
co el 1
,-.1
,w 1 in 03
64 I rz) In
+ In t's
_..
12
31
23
45
only
21
MEI
II
=1141111111111
111111
111111
11111
11111
11111
11111
111111
111111
11111
- VZ,/
,,
1.Conduct regular fire and disaster
drills.
//,
9131
41//
,,,7
4
n/t/M7d
FYIrt-/
2.Check availability of fire control
equip
ment
,
1111
1111
111111
111111
1111
1111111
//A3.
Fill out accident reports.
.71
"11
1111
1111
111111
111111
11111
11111
///..
4.Conduct safety inspection.
"Mil
Or 1
1 1
111111111
111111
11111
11111
#771
5.Schedule cleaning of unit, including
patient
roam
s.0,
111H.
=I111111
1111
1111
1W./
6.Inspect cleanliness and sanitation of
the unit.
MI
/ /Z
.
1111
1111
1111
111
INI1
1111
1 i
III
///,
47.
Investigate loss and damage claims.
11 11
111111111
11111111111MU
UM
f/Z1
8.Participate in emergency mobilization of
unit
per
sonn
el.
IWZ.
.-
-
--
s.&
KEY
TO
SIT
IBO
IS :
= mode
val
ues;
11E
l =
cler
ical
res
pond
ents
:' /
/1=
mana
geri
al r
espe
nden
ts.I
fifi
lj1=
res
cons
.,ex4.ert
rv.:1;
411=
non
-uni
t pe
rson
nel
A-(5) Clerical Functions -- Safety and Sanitation
Description of Area
The eight tasks in this function deal with the safety and sanitationaspects of patient care. They include scheduling the cleaning of the unitand the checking of safety equipment as well as periodic drills for conductin emergency situations.
Performance
Managerial personnel reported performing all the safety and sanitationtasks. None were performed by clerical personnel. Task 3 (fill out accidentreports) was the task in this function most frequently performed by managerialrespondents.
Frequency
Task 5 (scheduling the cleaning of units) emerged as the most frequentlyperformed task. Task 4 (conduct safety inspection) and Task 6 (inspectcleanliness and sanitation of the unit) were the other frequently-performedtasks in this function.
Difficulty
Clerks rated Task 4 (conduct safety inspection) as the most difficulttask. Both clerks and managers indicated that all but Task 1 (conductregular fire and disaster drills) were easy. Experts rated Task 6 (inspectcleanliness and sanitation of the unit) as easy and all other tasks asmoderate in difficulty.
Criticality
Experts assigned all but one task to managerial personnel. Task 1(conduct regular fire and disaster drills), which is currently performedby managers, was considered a task to be done by a person outside theunit. They recommended the administrator as the individual who shouldmake this determination.
General Remarks
In developing curriculum for Function A-(5), it would appear thatinstruction regarding fundamental policies pertaining to legal implicationsand sanitation requirements would be beneficial preparation for the workexperience. Since no two health care facilities are identical, however,many of the details of implementing the programs are best provided by in-house preparation for procedures, development of check lists, etc.
37
FIGURE B-(1
)ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS -- ESTABLISHING OBJECT
IVES AND POLICIES
B.
ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS
(1)
Establishing Objectives and Policies
Performed or Supervised
by respondents
Frequency '
as rated by respondents
;
Dif
ficu
lty
rated
by r
espo
nden
tsand
Expert Panel
Criticality
rated
by E
xper
t Pa
nel
only
Occupatio
nal
Level
judg
ed b
yExpert Panel
only
as v C1 ,!1
as
cm v I CVin
co qe h inc)
+ cP hin1
23
12
33
2I
= t#
1111
1111
1111
1111
111
///..
1.Formulate goals of nursing unit.
r, v
. m
. gr
. r. c
,'
i11
1111
11IU
MIN
IMH
MI
1111
11//Z
.2.
Develop policies and establish procedure
for activities within the unit.