Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Paleoceanography
Supporting Information for
The evaluation of eccentricity-related amplitude modulation and bundling in
paleoclimate data: An inverse approach for astrochronologic testing
and time scale optimization
Stephen R. Meyers
Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Contents of this file Figures S1 to S6
Additional Supporting Information (Files uploaded separately)
Software S1. R-script for the analysis of ODP Site 1262 a* data Software S2. R-script for the analysis of ODP Site 926B oxygen isotope data
Introduction
This Supporting Information contains six figures illustrating TimeOpt analysis results for three models (Figures S1-S3), an alternative analysis of the benthic foraminifera δ18O data from ODP Site 926B (Figure S5), and evolutive harmonic analysis results for the data from ODP Sites 1262 and 926B (Figures S4 and S6). In addition to these figures, two R-script files are presented that document the TimeOpt analyses of data from ODP Sites 1262 and 926B, including the reconstruction of Figures 3 and 5 from the main manuscript.
2
0 5 10 15 20
-2-1
01
2S
tand
ardi
zed
Val
ue
Depth (m)
(a)
2 3 4 5
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
(e)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Env
elop
e Fi
t
Sedimentation Rate (cm/ka)
Spe
ctra
l Pow
er F
it
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20 (b)
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
Spe
ctra
l Pow
er
Frequency (cycles/ka)2 3 4 5
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
Env
elop
e &
Pow
er F
itSedimentation Rate (cm/ka)
(f)
0 100 200 300 400
-0.4
0.0
0.2
0.4
)
Sta
ndar
dize
d V
alue
Time (ka)
(c)@ 4.57 cm/ka
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
N = 2000 Bandwidth = 0.02274
Den
sity
# S
imul
atio
ns
Envelope & Power Fit
(g)r2
opt=0.370
0 100 200 300 400
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Val
ueS
tand
ardi
zed
Val
ue
Time (ka)
(d)@ 4.57 cm/ka
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Fitte
d E
ccen
trici
ty
Data Precession Envelope
(h)
Figure S1. TimeOpt analysis of an AR1 stochastic noise model. The model spans 0-1000 ka (sampling interval of 5 ka), with a lag-1 autocorrelation of 0.9, and a sedimentation rate of 2.00 cm/ka. (a) The AR1 stratigraphic model. (b) Periodogram for the AR1 model, given the TimeOpt derived sedimentation rate of 4.57 cm/ka (black line=linear spectrum; gray line=log spectrum). Yellow shaded region indicates the portion of the spectrum bandpassed for evaluation of the precession amplitude envelope. (c) Comparison of the bandpassed precession signal (black), and the data amplitude envelope (red) determined via Hilbert transform. (d) Comparison of the data amplitude envelope (red) and the TimeOpt-reconstructed eccentricity model (black; derived using EQ. 1). (e) Squared Pearson correlation coefficient for the amplitude envelope fit (r2
envelope ; shown as red dots) and the spectral power fit (r2spectral ; dark gray line) at each
3
evaluated sedimentation rate. (f) Combined envelope and spectral power fit (r2opt) at each
evaluated sedimentation rate. (g) Summary of 2000 Monte Carlo simulations with AR1 surrogates, used to evaluate the significance of the maximum observed r2
opt of 0.370. The p-value is 0.398. (h) Cross plot of the data amplitude envelope and the TimeOpt-reconstructed eccentricity model in panel “d”; dashed red line is the 1:1 line.
4
0 5 10 15 20
-10
12
3S
tand
ardi
zed
Val
ue
Depth (m)
(a)
2 3 4 5
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7 (e)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Env
elop
e Fi
t
Sedimentation Rate (cm/ka)
Spe
ctra
l Pow
er F
it
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.12 (b)
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
Spe
ctra
l Pow
er
Frequency (cycles/ka)2 3 4 5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Env
elop
e &
Pow
er F
itSedimentation Rate (cm/ka)
(f)
0 200 400 600 800
-1.5
-0.5
0.5
1.5
)
Sta
ndar
dize
d V
alue
Time (ka)
(c)@ 2.15 cm/ka
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
05
1015
N = 2000 Bandwidth = 0.005463
Density
# S
imul
atio
ns
Envelope & Power Fit
(g)
r2opt=0.388
0 200 400 600 800
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Value
Sta
ndar
dize
d V
alue
Time (ka)
(d)@ 2.15 cm/ka
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
0.2
0.6
1.0
Fitte
d E
ccen
trici
ty
Data Precession Envelope
(h)
Figure S2. TimeOpt analysis of a standardized eccentricity + precession (EP) model that contains a linear sedimentation rate increase. The model spans 0-1000 ka (sampling interval of 5 ka), with a linear sedimentation rate increase from 1.5 to 2.5 cm/ka. The average sedimentation rate for this record is 2.00 cm/ka. (a) The EP stratigraphic model. (b) Periodogram for the EP model, given the TimeOpt derived sedimentation rate of 2.15 cm/ka (black line=linear spectrum; gray line=log spectrum). Yellow shaded region indicates the portion of the spectrum bandpassed for evaluation of the precession amplitude envelope. (c) Comparison of the bandpassed precession signal (black), and the data amplitude envelope (red) determined via Hilbert transform. (d) Comparison of the data amplitude envelope (red) and the TimeOpt-reconstructed eccentricity model (black; derived using EQ. 1). (e) Squared Pearson correlation coefficient for the amplitude envelope fit (r2
envelope ; shown as red dots) and
5
the spectral power fit (r2spectral ; dark gray line) at each evaluated sedimentation rate. (f)
Combined envelope and spectral power fit (r2opt) at each evaluated sedimentation rate. (g)
Summary of 2000 Monte Carlo simulations with AR1 surrogates (ρAR1=0.628), used to evaluate the significance of the maximum observed r2
opt of 0.388. The p-value is 0.005. (h) Cross plot of the data amplitude envelope and the TimeOpt-reconstructed eccentricity model in panel “d”; dashed red line is the 1:1 line.
6
0 5 10 15
-10
12
3S
tand
ardi
zed
Val
ue
Depth (m)
(a)
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7 (e)
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
Env
elop
e Fi
t
Sedimentation Rate (cm/ka)
Spe
ctra
l Pow
er F
it
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.12 (b)
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
Spe
ctra
l Pow
er
Frequency (cycles/ka)1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Env
elop
e &
Pow
er F
itSedimentation Rate (cm/ka)
(f)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
-1.5
-0.5
0.5
1.5
)
Sta
ndar
dize
d V
alue
Time (ka)
(c)@ 1.78 cm/ka
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
05
1015
N = 2000 Bandwidth = 0.00533
Den
sity
# S
imul
atio
ns
Envelope & Power Fit
(g)
r2opt=
0.518
0 200 400 600 800 1000
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
Val
ueS
tand
ardi
zed
Val
ue
Time (ka)
(d)@ 1.78 cm/ka
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Fitte
d E
ccen
trici
ty
Data Precession Envelope
(h)
Figure S3. TimeOpt analysis of a standardized eccentricity + precession (EP) model that has undergone distortion by differential accumulation. The model spans 0-1000 ka (sampling interval of 5 ka), and the sedimentation rate is forced by the amplitude of the signal in panel “a”, linearly scaled to range from 1.5 to 2.5 cm/ka. The average sedimentation rate for this record is 1.79 cm/ka. (a) The EP stratigraphic model. (b) Periodogram for the EP model, given the TimeOpt derived sedimentation rate of 1.78 cm/ka (black line=linear spectrum; gray line=log spectrum). Yellow shaded region indicates the portion of the spectrum bandpassed for evaluation of the precession amplitude envelope. (c) Comparison of the bandpassed precession signal (black), and the data amplitude envelope (red) determined via Hilbert transform. (d) Comparison of the data amplitude envelope (red) and the TimeOpt-reconstructed eccentricity model (black; derived using EQ. 1). (e) Squared Pearson correlation coefficient for the amplitude envelope fit (r2
envelope ; shown as red dots) and the spectral power
7
fit (r2spectral ; dark gray line) at each evaluated sedimentation rate. (f) Combined envelope and
spectral power fit (r2opt) at each evaluated sedimentation rate. (g) Summary of 2000 Monte
Carlo simulations with AR1 surrogates (ρAR1=0.676), used to evaluate the significance of the maximum observed r2
opt of 0.518. The p-value is 0.005. (h) Cross plot of the data amplitude envelope and the TimeOpt-reconstructed eccentricity model in panel “d”; dashed red line is the 1:1 line.
8
Amplitudea*3 5 764
Frequency (cycles/m)
140
135
130
125
120
Dep
th (m
cd)
(b) Evolutive Harmonic AnalysisThree 2π DPSS tapers
5 meter window
PrecessionEccentricity
(a) Data Series
Figure S4. Evolutive harmonic analysis (EHA) of the Site 1262 a* data. (a) The a* (red/green ratio) color reflectance data from Site 1262. (b) EHA results for the Site 1262 a* data, using three 2π DPSS tapers and a 5 meter moving window (Meyers et al., 2001). A linear trend was removed from each 5 meter window before analysis. The dashed white line at 130 mcd identifies a stepwise spatial shift in the dominant precession frequency, indicative of a sedimentation rate change. Above this horizon, the strength of the eccentricity signal also gradually diminishes, consistent with the TimeOpt results in Figure 4 (main manuscript).
9
440 450 460 470 480 490
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
18O
Depth (mcd)
(a)
2 3 4 5
0.0
50.1
50.2
50.3
5 (e)
0.0
50.1
50.2
5
En
ve
lop
e F
it
Sedimentation Rate (cm/ka)
Sp
ectr
al P
ow
er
Fit
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
0.0
00.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
4 (b)
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
Sp
ectr
al P
ow
er
Frequency (cycles/ka)
2 3 4 5
0.0
00.0
40.0
80.1
2
En
ve
lop
e &
Po
we
r F
itSedimentation Rate (cm/ka)
(f)
0 500 1000 1500
-1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
)
Sta
nd
ard
ize
d V
alu
e
Time (ka)
(c)@ 3.02 cm/ka
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
010
20
30
40
N = 2000 Bandwidth = 0.001849
Density
# S
imu
latio
ns
Envelope & Power Fit
(g)
r2
opt=
0.119
0 500 1000 1500
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
Valu
e
Sta
nd
ard
ize
d V
alu
e
Time (ka)
(d)@ 3.02 cm/ka
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
Fitte
d E
cce
ntr
icity
Data Precession Envelope
(h)
Figure S5. TimeOpt analysis of Miocene benthic foraminifera δ18O data (440–490 m composite depth) from ODP Site 926B on the Ceara Rise, using a model that includes the dominant obliquity term (40.16 ka; Laskar et al., 2004). (a) Benthic foraminifera δ18O data (permil VPDB), adjusted for seawater disequilibrium (Pälike et al., 2006a). (b) Periodogram for the 926B δ18O data, given the TimeOpt derived sedimentation rate of 3.02 cm/ka (black line=linear spectrum; gray line=log spectrum). Yellow shaded region indicates the portion of the spectrum bandpassed for evaluation of the precession amplitude envelope. (c) Comparison of the bandpassed precession signal (black), and the data amplitude envelope (red) determined via Hilbert transform. (d) Comparison of the data amplitude envelope (red) and the TimeOpt-reconstructed eccentricity model (black; derived using EQ. 1). (e) Squared Pearson correlation coefficient for the amplitude envelope fit (r2
envelope ; shown as red dots) and the spectral power
10
fit (r2spectral ; dark gray line) at each evaluated sedimentation rate. (f) Combined envelope and
spectral power fit (r2opt) at each evaluated sedimentation rate. (g) Summary of 2000 Monte
Carlo simulations with AR1 surrogates (ρAR1=0.706), used to evaluate the significance of the maximum observed r2
opt of 0.119. (h) Cross plot of the data amplitude envelope and the TimeOpt-reconstructed eccentricity model in panel “d”; dashed red line is the 1:1 line.
11
Amplitude
δ18Obenthic (‰ VPDB)1.2 2.22.01.6
Frequency (cycles/m)490
480
470
460
450
Dep
th (m
cd)
(b) Evolutive Harmonic AnalysisThree 2π DPSS tapers
20 meter window
PrecessionEccentricity
440
Obliquity
~20 ka hiatus
~20 ka hiatus
(a) Data Series
Figure S6. Evolutive harmonic analysis (EHA) of the Site 926B δ18O data. (a) The δ18O data from Site 926B. (b) EHA amplitude results for the Site 926B δ18O data, using three 2π DPSS tapers and a 20 meter moving window (Meyers et al., 2001). A linear trend was removed from each 20 meter window before analysis. The presence of two hiatuses is suggested by the bifurcation of the obliquity signal centered on ~471 mcd and ~455 mcd; using the method of Meyers and Sageman (2004), each hiatus is estimated to have a duration of ~20 ka. Note that a larger interval of the Site 926B δ18O data was analyzed here (gray boxes in panel “a” indicate additional data), to provide a better context for the observed obliquity bifurcations. The
12
dashed box identifies the portion of the EHA plot containing results from the same interval analyzed using TimeOpt. Software S1. R-script for the analysis of ODP Site 1262 a* data, Meyers_Software_S2_Site_1262.r. Software S2. R-script for the analysis of ODP Site 926B oxygen isotope data, Meyers_Software_S2_Site_926B.r.