Upload
felicia-greene
View
219
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Conservation Action Planning (CAP) Process
Quick TourProject-level planning &
measures within The Nature Conservancy
Conservation Action
Planning
Defining Your Project
Developing Strategies &
Measures
Implementing Strategies &
Measures
Using Results to Adapt & Improve
Developing Strategies &
Measures
Implementing Strategies &
Measures
Using Results to Adapt & Improve
Defining Your Project
Defining Your Project
· Project people· Project scope & focal
targets
Defining Your Project
· Project people· Project scope & focal
targetsWho will design and implement the project?
Laojunshan Project –
Yunnan
Condor Bioreserve, Ecuador
Defining Your Project
· Project people· Project scope & focal targetsWhat is the
overall vision and scale of the project?
Defining Your Project
· Project people· Project scope &
focal targets
What biodiversity are we trying to conserve or restore?
Defining Your Project
Developing Strategies &
Measures
Implementing Strategies &
Measures
Using Results to Adapt & Improve
Developing Strategies & Measures
· Target viability· Critical threats· Situation analysis· Objectives & actions· Measures
Developing Strategies & Measures
· Target viability· Critical threats· Situation analysis· Objectives & actions· Measures
Overall Viability Summary
Conservation TargetsLandscape
ContextCondition Size
Viability Rank
1 North Shore Forests & Cliffs Fair Good Fair Fair
2 Montane Wet Forest FairVery Good
Fair Good
3South Slope Mesic Forest & Shrubland Poor Good Poor Fair
Overall Biodiversity Health Rank Fair
What is our best estimate of how the biodiversity we care about is doing?
Developing Strategies & Measures
· Target viability· Critical threats· Situation analysis· Objectives & actions· Measures
What threats are creating problems and what is the estimated seriousness of these threats?
Threats Across SystemsNorth Shore
Forests & Cliffs
Montane Wet Forest
South Slope Mesic Forest &
Shrubland
North Shore Perennial Streams
South Shore Fringing Reef
Overall Threat RankProject-specific threats
1Established Non-Native Ungulates (Pigs, Goats, Axis Deer)
High High High Low High High
2New Invasive Plant and Animal Species
High High High Medium - High
3Established Habitat-Modifying Weeds
High High High - - High
4 Wildfires - Medium High - High High
5 Over Harvesting - - - Low High Medium
6Invasive Alien Marine Species
- - - - High Medium
7 Invasive Alien Algae - - - - High Medium
Threat Status for Targets and Project
High High High Medium High Very High
Sa
n M
igu
el
/ D
olo
res
Riv
er
Bio
div
ers
ity
Development of Roads& Utilities
Primary Home Development
Woodland & Shrub Systems
Sage Brush Shrb
Desert Shrub
PJ Woodland
Fire RegimeFire
SuppressionAgency Policies
Public Attitudes
Oil & Gas Drilling
Montane Shrub
Historic Grazing
Invasive Plants- cheatgrass- knapweed
Lack of Surface Fires
O7
O7
O7
O8
Gunnison Prairie DogPlague
Shooting & Poisoning
Attitudes Toward
Prairie Dogs O9
Situation Analysis for San Miguel Terrestrial Targets
O3
Developing Strategies & Measures
· Target viability· Critical threats· Situation analysis· Objectives & actions· Measures
Who are the key stakeholders with vested interest in the project, what factors are driving critical threats, and what opportunities exist?
Developing Strategies & Measures
· Target viability· Critical threats· Situation analysis· Objectives & actions· Measures
What specific outcomes are we trying to achieve?
• By 2008, reduce the mean percent cover of invasive species to less than 5% across over at least 9,000 acres of invaded forest.
Developing Strategies & Measures
· Target viability· Critical threats· Situation analysis· Objectives & actions· Measures
What actions are needed to achieve the outcomes?Objective Ungulates: By 2014, reduce the
frequency of ungulate activity to less than 10% in areas with active ungulate control programs.
Strategic action
Continue to develop and implement a comprehensive ungulate control program through the East Molokai Watershed Partnership.
Objective Wildfires: By 2009, reduce the amount of burned native ecological systems to zero.
Strategic action
Work with key fire management partners to develop and implement a landscape fire management strategy and action plan.
Developing Strategies &
Measures
Developing Strategies & Measures
· Target viability· Critical threats· Situation analysis· Objectives & actions· Measures
Percentage of native canopy coverIndicator:
Acres and density of specific weedsIndicator:
Weeds: By 2014, reduce or contain (as appropriate to specific species) the range and/or density of habitat-modifying weeds within selected management units.
Objective:
Frequency of ungulate signIndicator:
Ungulates: By 2014, reduce the frequency of ungulate activity to less than 10% in areas with active ungulate control programs.
Objective:
Number of discovered or reported incipient invasive species eradicatedIndicator:
Number of priority incipient invasive species kept off the islandIndicator:
New invasives: Prevent the establishment of new invasive plant or animal species on the island.
Objective:
Objectives and Indicators#
East Molokai
Strategies
Strategy effectiveness measures
Are our actions achieving the desired outcomes?
Defining Your Project
Developing Strategies &
Measures
Implementing Strategies &
Measures
Using Results to Adapt & Improve
ImplementingStrategies & Measures
· Develop workplans· Implement actions· Implement measures
ImplementingStrategies & Measures
· Develop workplans· Implement actions· Implement measures
What do we specifically need to do, and who will do it?
Defining Your Project
Developing Strategies &
Measures
Implementing Strategies &
Measures
Using Results to Adapt & Improve
Using Results toAdapt & Improve
· Analyze actions & data· Learn from results· Adapt project· Share findings
Using Results to Adapt & Improve
Using Results toAdapt & Improve
· Analyze actions & data· Learn from results· Adapt project· Share findings
How should we adapt our actions and share results to achieve impact at broader scales?
Conservation Action
Planning
Defining Your Project
· Project people· Project scope & focal
targets
Developing Strategies & Measures
· Target viability· Critical threats· Situation analysis· Objectives & actions· Measures
ImplementingStrategies & Measures
· Develop workplans· Implement actions· Implement measures
Using Results toAdapt & Improve
· Analyze actions & data· Learn from results· Adapt project· Share findings
FY05 CAP Working Group• Jeff Baumgartner, Global
Conservation Approach Team • Silvia Benitez, Ecuador Program • Lacey Halstead, Texas Program • Cristina Lasch, Mexico Program • Genevieve Pence, Florida
Program • Nick Salafsky, Foundations of
Success • Dan Salzer, Global
Conservation Approach Team • Rob Sutter, Southern U.S.
Region • Jora Young, Global
Conservation Approach Team
CAP Basic Practices
http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/cap
LOCAL BENEFITS • Strategic thinking and
analysis process – aimed at selecting high impact conservation strategies
• Enables adaptive management at a local scale
BENEFITS AT SCALE • Facilitates cross-project
learning • Captures the essential
ingredients common to successful conservation projects
• Enables the sharing of project-level work
2 Faces of CAP
• What is the biodiversity of interest and its status?• What threats exist and what’s their importance?• Which stakeholders should be engaged, what underlying
causes and opportunities warrant attention?• What specific outcomes are we trying to achieve?• What actions are we taking to achieve the desired
outcomes?• How do we know if our actions are working?• How can we adapt and learn and share results to achieve
impact at broader scales?
CAP addresses these key questions…