Conflict Management in Indonesia – An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    1/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in

    Maluku, Papua and Poso

    June 2011

    The Indonesian Institute of Sciences,

    Current Asia and the Centre for

    Humanitarian Dialogue

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    2/73

    Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, 2011

    Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue

    114, rue de Lausanne

    Geneva 1202

    Switzerland

    t + 41 22 908 11 30

    f +41 22 908 11 40

    e [email protected]

    w www.hdcentre.org

    The Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue (HD Centre)

    Mediation for peace

    The Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue (HD Centre) is an independent mediation

    organisation dedicated to helping improve the global response to armed conflict.

    It attempts to achieve this by mediating between warring parties and providing

    support to the broader mediation community.

    The HD Centre is driven by humanitarian values and its ultimate goal to reduce

    the consequences of violent conflict, improve security, and contribute to the

    peaceful resolution of conflict.

    It maintains a neutral stance towards the warring parties that it mediates

    between and, in order to maintain its impartiality it is funded by a variety of

    governments, private foundations and philanthropists.

    Cover images

    Front: World Indigenous Peoples Day, 9 August, Wamena in Papua. Muridan Widjojo

    Back: A batik design from Indonesia. iStockphoto

    Supported by the MacArthur Foundation

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    3/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in

    Maluku, Papua and Poso

    The Indonesian Institute of Sciences,

    Current Asia and the Centre for

    Humanitarian Dialogue

    June 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    4/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia2

    Copyright and credits

    Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue

    , rue de LausanneGeneva

    Switzerland

    t +

    f +

    e [email protected]

    w www.hdcentre.org

    Centre or Humanitarian Dialogue,

    Reproduction o all or part o this publication may be

    authorised only with written consent and acknowl-

    edgement o the source.

    Editor: Cate Buchanan ([email protected])

    Deputy editor: Adam Cooper

    Design and layout: Rick Jones ([email protected])

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    5/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 3

    Acronyms and terminology ....................................................................................................................................................................5

    About the contributors .................................................................................................................................................................................8

    Summary .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................10

    Introduction 10

    Significant issues in peace processes in Indonesia 11

    Observations 14

    Case Study One

    Conflict and violence in Maluku:Resolution and management approaches ...................................................................................................................16

    Introduction 16

    Figure 1: Map of Maluku 17

    Box 1: The chronology of the conflict in Maluku 18

    Conflict management actors and initiatives 20

    The emergency and security approach to conflict management 21

    The Malino Peace Agreement 25

    Box 2: The Malino II Agreeement 26

    The recovery and development phase 27

    Conclusion 31

    Case Study Two

    Jakarta Papua: A dialogue in the making ................................................................................................................32

    Introduction 32

    Figure 1: Map of Papua 33

    Conflict management initiatives for Papua 35

    Contents

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    6/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia4

    Box 1: OTSUS Its origins and contents 37

    Box 2: Assessing OTSUS 38

    Resolving the Papua Conflict 40

    Preparing the ground for dialogue 42

    Recommendations 44

    Papuan Perspectives on Peace in West PapuaOtto Ondawame .................................................................................................................................................................................................46

    Colonization, conflict and violence in West Papua 46

    Melanesian conflict resolution styles and approaches 49

    Recommendations 50

    Case Study ThreeViolent conflict and its management in Poso, Central Sulawesi .................................................52

    Introduction 52

    Figure 1: Map of Poso 54

    Box 1: Timeline of the conflict in Poso 55

    Conflict resolution initiatives 57

    Box 2: Ten points of the Malino I Declaration 60

    Conclusion 67

    Annexes ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................69

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    7/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 5

    Adat

    Group o customary laws or the unwritten traditionalcode that regulates social political, and economic

    practices, as well as dispute resolution

    AJI

    Te Indonesian Journalists Alliance /

    Aliansi Jurnalis Idependen

    BAKORNAS PBP

    Te National Coordinating Body or Disaster

    and Internally Displaced Persons Management /

    Badan Koordinasi Nasional Penanganan Bencanadan Pengungsi

    Bappenas

    National Development Planning Agency /

    Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Nasional

    BIN

    State Intelligence Agency / Badan Intelijen Negara

    Brimob

    Mobile Brigade / Brigade Mobil

    BupatiIndonesia is divided into provinces. Provinces

    are made up o regencies and cities. Provinces,

    regencies and cities do have their own local gov-

    ernments and parliamentary bodies. Regencies are

    headed by a bupati, normally translated into English

    as regent

    DOM

    Military operation zone / Daerah Operasi Militer

    DPDRegional Representatives Council /

    Dewan Perwakilan Daerah

    DPR

    Peoples Representative Council /Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat

    ELSHAM

    Institute or Human Rights Study and Advocacy /

    Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Hak Asasi Manusia

    GoI

    Government o Indonesia

    IDP

    Internally displaced people or person

    Kodam

    Military Regional Command /

    Komando Daerah Militer

    Kodap

    erritorial War Command /

    Komando Daerah Perang

    KOMNAS HAM

    Indonesias National Commission or Human

    Rights / Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia

    KontraS

    Commission on Missing Persons and Victims o

    Violence / Komisi untuk Orang Hilang dan Korban

    indak Kekerasan

    KOPASSUS

    Special Forces Command / Komando Pasukan Khusus

    Korem

    Sub-regional military command /

    Komando Resort Militer

    LBH Jakarta

    Jakarta Legal Aid Institute / Lembaga Bantuan Hukum

    Acronyms and terminology

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    8/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia6

    LIPI

    Indonesian Institute o Sciences /

    Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

    Menko Kesra

    Coordinating Ministry or Peoples Welare /

    Kementrian Koordinator Kesejahteraan Rakyat

    Pemekaran

    Division o provinces and districts into smaller

    administrative units

    Perda

    Regional regulations / Peraturan Daerah

    POLRI

    Indonesian National Police /

    Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia

    TNIIndonesian National Army /

    entara Nasional Indonesia

    UKP

    Presidential Working Unit or Supervision

    and Management o Development /

    Unit Kerja Presiden bidang Pengawasan dan

    Pengendalian Pembangunan

    YLBHI

    Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation /

    Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia

    Maluku specific

    FKM

    Maluku Front Sovereignty /

    Front Kedaulatan Maluku

    GPM

    Maluku Protestant Churches /

    Geredja Protestant Maluku

    ICMI

    Association o Muslim Intellectuals /

    Ikatan cendikiawan Muslim Indonesia

    Malino II

    Malino Peace Agreement /

    Perjanjian Malino II

    MMC

    Maluku Media Centre

    PARKINDOTe Indonesian Christian Party /

    Partai Kristen Indonesia

    PDI

    Te Indonesian Democratic Party /

    Partai Demokrasi Indonesia

    PDI-P

    Te Indonesian Democratic Party Struggle /

    Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan

    RMS

    Republic o South Maluku /

    Republik Maluku Selatan

    Papua specific

    DAP

    Papua Customary Council / Dewan Adat Papua

    DPRD

    Parliament o the West Papua Province /Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah

    DPRP

    Papuan Peoples Representative Council /

    Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Papua

    Foker LSM

    Papua NGO Cooperation Forum /

    Forum Kerja Sama Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat

    FORERI

    Forum or Reconciliation o the Irian Community /

    Forum Rekonsiliasi Masyarakat Irian Jaya

    FWPC

    Free West Papua Campaign

    KNPB

    West Papua National Committee /

    Komite Nasional Papua Barat

    MRP

    Papuan People Council / Peoples Consultative

    Assembly / Majelis Rakyat Papua

    OPM

    Papua Freedom Organisation / Papua Freedom

    Movement / Organisasi Papua Merdeka. Some

    authors reer to them as the Papua Freedom

    Organization and others as the Papua Freedom

    Movement.

    OTSUS

    Special Autonomy Law No. / /

    Otonomi Khusus bagi Provinsi Papua

    PDPPapuan Presidium Council /

    Presidium Dewan Papua

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    9/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 7

    PPN

    Papua Peace Network /

    Jaringan Damai Papua

    PVC

    Papuan Volunteer Corps

    UPBUnit or the Acceleration o Development in Papua

    and West Papua / Unit Percepatan Pembangunan

    Papua dan Papua Barat

    WPNA

    West Papua National Authority

    Poso specific

    GKST

    Central Sulawesi Christian Church /

    Gereja Kristen Sulawesi engah

    Malino I

    Malino Peace Declaration /Deklarasi Perdamaian Malino

    POKJA-RKP

    Te task orce or Poso conflict reconciliation /

    Kelompok Kerja Resolusi Konflik Poso

    PRKP

    Te Reconciliation Center or Poso conflict /

    Pusat Resolusi Konflik dan Perdamaian

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    10/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia8

    Acknowledgements and contributors

    Te HD Centre would like to thank the MacArthur

    Foundation and International Development

    Research Centre or their support o the project

    over .

    Te HD Centre also wishes to thank YuliIsmartono and John McBeth or their critical peer

    review o the case studies.

    Rohaiza Ahmad Asi received a BA rom the

    National University o Singapore where she majored

    in Political Science and Inormation and Commu-

    nications Management. She went on to pursue an

    MSc in International Relations at the S. Rajaratnam

    School o International Studies (RSIS) in Nanyang

    echnological University. In Rohaiza joinedRSIS as a research analyst ocusing on conflict and

    terrorism in Indonesia where she developed exten-

    sive practical research experience. Rohaiza joined

    the HD Centre in Singapore in and is currently

    a Project Officer. Rohaiza was involved in the research

    and drafing o the Poso and Maluku studies.

    Johari Efendigraduated in with a Bachelor

    o Law rom the General Soedirman University,

    Purwokerto, Central Java. He worked at the Legal

    Aid Foundation in Jakarta and became a lawyer in. He has more than a decade o experience in

    acilitation, programme design, and training o

    community groups and government officials across

    Indonesia on the issues o conflict mediation, good

    governance, peace-building, community justice,

    human rights, human security, and local autonomy.

    He has also worked with international agencies and

    the Indonesian central government. He was previ-

    ously the director o the Institut itian Perdamaian

    and is now a staff member o Current Asia. Johariwas involved in the research and drafing o the

    Poso and Maluku studies.

    Irine Hiraswari Gayatri graduated with an MA in

    peace and conflict studies, rom the Department o

    Peace and Conflict Studies o Uppsala Universitet,

    Sweden in August . Prior to getting her MA,

    she worked as researcher at the Centre or PoliticalStudies, Indonesian Institute o Sciences since .

    Between and she wrote three chapters in

    different books on Aceh, namely on post-disaster

    reconstruction, village governance and womens

    political representation in Aceh politics. In and

    early , she was also with the United Nations

    Recovery Coordinator (UNORC) as a field officer

    in West Coast Aceh and Bener Meriah and Central

    Aceh. In she supervised a joint survey o the

    Center or Political Studies, LIPI and Oxord Uni-versity on Horizontal Inequality in Bireuen, Aceh.

    Irine is also involved with the Jakarta-based NGO,

    INERSEKSI Foundation, which ocuses on minority

    issues and multiculturalism. Irine was involved in

    the drafing o the Papua study.

    Akiko Horibagraduated with a Masters o Teo-

    logical Studies rom the Weston Jesuit School o

    Teology, Cambridge, USA. Afer conducting local

    research in Indonesia, she was awarded a PhD in

    Area Studies rom Sophia University, okyo, Japan

    in . She was the research coordinator at the

    Institut itian Perdamaian, joining in . Since

    , she has been a staff member o Current Asia.

    Akiko was involved in the research and drafing o

    the Poso and Maluku studies.

    John Otto Ondawame is the Vice Chairperson o

    the West Papua National Coalition or Liberation

    (WPNCL). He was born in in Wanamum,

    Mimika Regency in West Papua. Ondawame was amember o the OPM and went into exile in . He

    obtained his PhD in political science rom Australian

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    11/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 9

    National University in Canberra in , MSc

    degree rom the University o Western Sydney in

    , Graduate Diplomas rom the University o

    Sydney in and the Uppsala University in ,

    and a Bachelor o Arts degree rom the Cenderawasih

    University, West Papua in . Ondawame was a

    recipient o the Reconciliation Award bestowedby the Australians Against Execution group, and

    the President Suharto Award or Academic

    Excellence. In , Ondawame joined the West

    Papua Project at the Centre or Peace and Conflict

    Studies o the University o Sydney as a project

    coordinator. Currently he is Coordinator or Inter-

    national Relations or the WPNCL operating rom

    its new office in Port Vila, Vanuatu.

    Marc Probst studied business administration,

    economics, business ethics, law and internationalrelations at the University o St Gallen, Switzerland,

    and at the Chinese University o Hong Kong. In

    , he joined the Political Affairs Division o the

    Swiss Department o Foreign Affairs as a project

    officer in the Peace Policy Section. He was also

    Head o the Desk, Human Security and Business,

    in the Human Rights Promotion Section. Marc

    joined the HD Centre in in Singapore and is a

    Project Manager. He was involved in the research

    and drafing o the Papua study.

    Muridan Widjojograduated in anthropology and

    French literature rom the University o Indonesia.

    Afer conducting archival and local research in

    Papua and Maluku, he was awarded a PhD rom

    the University o Leiden in the Netherlands. In

    he joined the Center or Political Studies at

    the Indonesian Institute o Sciences in Jakarta and

    specialises in the concerns o Papua and Maluku.

    He was also a member o investigation team o the

    National Commission o Human Rights in and has acted as a consultant or various organisa-

    tions in Papua since . Muridan was involved

    in the research and drafing o the Papua study.

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    12/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia10

    Introduction

    When President Soeharto ell rom power in

    afer years o authoritarian rule, it marked the

    beginning oboth Indonesias democratic transition

    and the eruption o the violent internal conflicts that

    had been simmering across the country. Separatist

    agitation increased across Aceh, Papua and East

    imor (now imor Leste).In the period rom

    to (when most o the communal conflicts were

    resolved) this violence is estimated to have displaced

    more than a million people and led to the loss o

    thousands o l ives. Post-Soeharto communal

    conflict resulted in . million internally displaced

    persons (IDPs).

    Indonesias dramatic democratic transition alsohad an impact on the ways in which conflict was

    (and is) managed. During the New Order era such

    conflict was systematically suppressed and not

    publicised or ear that it would trigger sentiments

    o ethnicity, religion and race among groups,

    commonly reerred to as SARA (short or suku,

    Te use o the word Papua in this report reers to Papua and West

    Papua provinces. Te area was previously known by various names,

    including Netherlands New Guinea (), Western New Guinea

    (May ), West Irian (), Irian Jaya () andPapua (-). In the western-most third o the region was

    split into a separate province, called West Irian Jaya, which was

    renamed Western Papua province in April . Indigenous people

    reer to Papua and West Papua provinces as West Papua.

    Varshney, Ashtosh et al., Patterns o Collective Violence in Indonesia

    -, UNSFIR Working Paper /, (Jakar ta: United Nations

    Support Facility or Indonesian Recovery, ). On violence in

    Indonesia post-Soeharto, see also: Colombijn, Freek and Li ndblad,

    Tomas J., Introduction, In Colombijn, Freek and Lindblad,

    Tomas, J., (Eds.), Roots o Violence in Indonesia, (Singapore:ISEAS,

    ).On the Maluku conflict, see: Sri, Yanuarti et.al., Konflik di

    Maluku engah: Penyebab, Karakteristik, dan Penyele saian Jangka

    Panjang, (Jakarta: LIPI, ). On the Aceh conflict, see: Aspinal,

    Edward, Violence and Identity Formation in Aceh under Indonesian

    Rule, In Anthony Reid (Ed.), Verandah o Violence, Te background

    to the Aceh problem(Singapore: Singapore University Press and World

    Scientific Publishing Co Pty Ltd., ()

    agama, ras, antargolongan). Indeed, it was this

    policy that was blamed or the outbreak o violent

    communal conflicts in the post-Soeharto era.

    Soehartos successor, Bacharuddin Jusu Habibie,

    began the process o decentralising power romJakarta and reducing the extensive reach o the

    military into political and economic lie. Tis politi-

    cal transition remade the relationship between the

    state and society and offered both challenges and

    opportunities or peacemakers. Broad changes

    took place across Indonesia, rom the increasing

    role o civil society in peacemaking to the changing

    relationship between the military and the police.

    Tese trends interacted with local grievances to

    produce a complex landscape o conflict that is still

    not well understood.

    The research gap

    Te approaches to conflict management that have

    emerged in Indonesia post-Soeharto thereore

    deserve attention. Analysis o these issues (typically

    through academic research) has ocused largely on

    the structural and proximate conflict drivers, the

    impact o these conflicts, and the actors involved:

    all o which offer important inormation or under-standing the contours o grievances and violence.

    Yet there is remarkably little comparative policy-

    ocused analysis o conflict management in Indonesia.

    Tis is striking given how requently the country has

    experienced violent upheaval. Tose responsible or

    conflict prevention and management lack access to

    timely comparative research on actors which enabled

    these violent conflicts to be settled, what potent issues

    remain and issues to consider or conflict resolution.

    Gershman, John, Indonesia: Islands o conflict,Asia imes Online ,

    October ().

    Summary

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    13/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 11

    In this light, the Centre or Humanitarian

    Dialogue (the HD Centre), the Indonesian Institute

    o Sciences (LIPI), the Institut itian Perdamaian

    (IP), and later Current Asia (CA), have worked

    together to fill this important inormation gap and

    produce policy relevant research which aims to

    inorm uture peacemaking efforts within Indone-sia. In several areas the halting o violence has not

    necessarily dealt conclusively with the underlying

    causes o conflict, and issues that could stimulate

    conflict remain unaddressed such as the role o

    security orces; equitable resource allocation; and

    the ongoing sensitive issues o ethnic and reli-

    gious identity.

    Tis report includes three case studies on con-

    flict management in Indonesia rom Papua, Poso in

    Central Sulawesi and Maluku. Poso and Maluku

    were chosen as case studies to provide insights on,

    and lessons learned rom, managing communal

    conflict. In both regions, the central government

    mediated agreements to end the violence in

    and respectively but only afer the conflict

    had been mismanaged or years. Research conducted

    or these reports indicates that todays peace remains

    ragile as root causes and new grievances emerging

    rom the conflicts were not ully addressed. In the

    main, government-mediated peace agreements

    have not been ully implemented and many resi-dents o Maluku or Poso appear poorly inormed

    o the contents o these agreements. Issues such

    as the return o IDPs and land disputes between

    different ethnic or religious groups, remain signifi-

    cant sources o tension. o the extent that violence

    has been reduced, it is important to decipher

    which o the many initiatives taken by government

    and non-government actors were responsible or

    these changes. Tese studies ask how the conflict

    was managed? o what effect? And what peace-

    making approaches can indeed be regarded assuccessul?

    Te case o Papua is even more pressing as the

    conflict is very much ongoing. Te special autonomy

    law (OSUS / Otonomi Khusus bagi Provinsi Papua)

    approved in was expected to reduce disparities

    between Papua and the Indonesian Government

    (GoI). It was also expected to give people in Papua,

    especially indigenous people, the chance to partici-

    pate actively in development processes. However,

    because the law has been poorly implemented, ithas ultimately uelled urther separatist sentiment.

    Papua also suffers rom local conflicts among indig-

    enous tribes, and more recently, tensions between

    indigenous people (ofen Christians) and settlers

    (ofen Muslims). Te Papua section is both retro-

    spective and orward looking, asking how the conflict

    can be de-escalated and who should be involved?

    As well as what obstacles and opportunities there

    are or peacemaking?

    Methodology

    With the support o the MacArthur Foundation

    through its Asia Security Initiative, the HD Centre,

    LIPI, IP (and eventually CA) undertook a wide

    range o research. Support was also received rom

    the International Development Research Centre.

    Troughout and up to mid- detailed

    primary research was undertaken in Maluku, Poso

    and Papua. Te methodology or this researchincluded ocus group discussions, workshops and

    individual briefings. Tese were complemented by

    interviews with officials rom the central govern-

    ment and non-government actors in Jakarta, as well

    as drawing on materials rom secondary sources.

    An annotated bibliography containing selective

    material relevant to conflict management in Papua,

    Maluku and Poso was produced in early .For

    more detail see Annex : Research methodology.

    Significant issues in peace

    processes in Indonesia

    Decentralization

    Decentralisation and regional autonomy became a

    national priority during the period o reormasi.A

    number o laws introduced in shifed power

    away rom the central government.Te heads o

    regional governments, districts (bupati) and mayors

    (walikota) became elected positions or the firsttime. Decentralisation with its many positive and

    Available at www.hdcentre.org/files/IndonesiaLiterature

    ReviewJanuary_.pd

    Te Post-Soeharto era in Indonesia began with the all o Soeharto

    in . Since then Indonesia has been in a period o transition. Tis

    era has been called the period o reormasi(reorm).

    Tese include Law No. / on Regional Government and Law

    No. / on Financial balance be tween the Central a nd Regional

    Government. Tese two national laws replaced previous national

    laws that regulated the administrative structure o regional govern-

    ments, Law No. / on Regional Government and Law No. /

    on Village Government. Te latter law had previously introduced the

    Javanese administrative structure or vi llages throughout Indonesia.

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    14/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia12

    democratic benefits also led to major challenges.

    Te local population, ofen reerred to as sons o

    the soil (putra daerah) were given priority or civil

    service positions in local government. Control o

    the civil service offered the power to allocate jobs,

    contracts and engage in corruption. Unsurprisingly

    then, those who controlled the bureaucracy underSoeharto (who were not necessarily rom the local

    population) resented losing their privileged posi-

    tions. Hence, there was sharp competition among

    elites, sometimes along ethnic lines, and divisions

    were sharpened between those considered locals

    and migrants.

    Tese changes had a proound impact on con-

    flict management. In many cases they engendered

    urther conusion withingovernment. Te division

    o power between provincial and district government

    lacked clarity, and co-ordination in crisis situationswas disjointed. Corruption became more prevalent

    because o the shif o financial power to local govern-

    ment, compounded by the lack o sound supervision

    and a strong central government to monitor the

    implementation o these new laws. Local adminis-

    trators throughout Indonesia now have considerable

    power over the exploitation o resources.

    Such difficulties between provincial and district

    governments led the central government to reassert

    itsel in late with the result that the central gov-

    ernment stepped up its efforts or conflict resolution.

    Suffice to say, the post-Soeharto reorm process is

    still a work in progress with the resulting decen-

    tralisation having implications or effective conflict

    resolution.

    Consequently, the efforts o central government

    ministers particularly Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono

    and Jusu Kalla led to the Malino peace declara-

    tion in Poso in December (Malino I) and the

    Malino peace agreement in Maluku and North Maluku

    in February (Malino II).

    Both Malino I andMalino II were perceived as political announce-

    ments to mark the end o conflict, but critically

    neither was a participatory process in which local

    Richard, Seymour, and urner, Sarah, Otonomi daerah: Indonesias

    decentralisation experi ment, New Zealand Journal o Asian Studies

    (), pp.-.

    Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, Coordinating Minister or Political

    and Security Affai rs, -; Jusu Kalla, Coordinating Minister

    or Peoples Welare, -.

    Te Malino Declaration on Poso can be accessed at www.relieweb.

    int/rw/rwb.ns/dbSID/ACOS-BRC?OpenDocument; Malino II

    Peace Agreement on Maluku can be accessed at www.relieweb.int/

    rw/RWB.NSF/dbSID/ACOS-CDMA?OpenDocument.

    communities were involved in the planning or imple-

    mentation o the agreements. Tese agreements

    were criticised or ocusing on physical recovery,

    reconstruction and the provision o emergency aid

    to IDPs instead o addressing root causes. Among

    the major criticisms cited are: a lack o consultation

    with the local community on the peace agreements;members o the negotiating teams did not repre-

    sent the needs o the locals; and the agreements did

    not address the structural causes o the conflicts.

    For example, resources and economic opportuni-

    ties are still unequally distributed, and relocated

    IDPs have not been effectively re-integrated into

    their new environments.

    Security forces

    It was only during the presidency o AbdurrahmanWahid (-) that military reorm started to

    be taken seriously. While the military, entara

    Nasional Indonesia(NI), and the police had been

    two branches o the Republic o Indonesia Armed

    Forces (ABRI) under Soeharto, by they had

    been separated as part o the process o security

    sector reorm.On paper the police were tasked

    with internal security while the military was re-

    sponsible or national deence. However, during

    this transition, the division o responsibilities and

    relations between the military and police were not

    clearly defined. Tere was also a degree o resistance

    rom elements o the military, which has a long

    tradition o regarding the police as the inerior

    orce. In practice, the military was still called upon

    or internal security duties where they had to work

    closely with the police. Te military remained politi-

    cally influential, especially in ormulating national

    security policy. Moreover, while the military had

    wo pieces o legislat ion, Law No. / on State Deense and Law

    No. / on the Indonesian Armed Forces, constitute the most

    important laws in the reorm o the security sector. Te role and

    unctions o the military and the police are then urther defined in

    the ollowing two new acts: according to the State Deence Act

    No./, the NI is a deence instrument o the unitary Republic

    o Indonesia (Article ). Meanwhile, the National Police Act

    No. / states that the police orce is an instrument o the state

    responsible or guarding public security and order and tasked with

    protecting, guiding and ser ving the public as well as upholding the

    law. Te Law No. / also clearly stipulates that the Police are a

    civilian orce responsible or internal security matters. For more

    inormation, see Sukma, Rizal a nd Prasetyono, Edy, Security sector

    reorm in Indonesia: Te military and the police, Working Paper ,

    Netherlands Institute o International Relations Clingadael Conflict

    Research Unit (Berlin: Bergho Research Centre or Constructive

    Conflict Management, ).

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    15/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 13

    experience handling separatist or anti-government

    violence, communal conflicts such as those in

    Maluku and Poso had no clear enemy and proved

    ar harder to manage, requiring skills the military

    lacked. In recent years, the position o the police has

    improved, not least in terms o budgetary support.

    The roles of women

    Tough women are ofen assumed to be victims in

    armed conflicts, womens roles in violent conflicts

    present a ar more complex picture. For example,

    womens resilience through their economic activi-

    ties, care o amily and children, and community

    networks help prevent urther societal disinte-

    gration in the midst o violence and insecurity.

    In Indonesia this is certainly the case. Women also

    played important roles in inormal reconciliationbetween the conflicting parties. O course, women

    also played active roles in perpetrating violence

    as combatants, commanders, messengers and

    provocateurs.

    In Ambon, Poso and Aceh, women led many

    inter-religious and peace dialogue processes at

    the grassroots level. ypically perceived as non-

    threatening (perhaps even powerless) by many in

    the community, they are ofen able to influence men

    and husbands to lay down their weapons. While

    women have played an extensive role in managingconflict at the community level in a variety o

    ways, their involvement in conflict resolution at

    higher political levels is minimal. For example, in

    the Helsinki agreement on Aceh, only one woman,

    an advisor to the Free Aceh Movement (GAM),

    was involved in the peace process.wo women

    pastors rom the Christian community and a

    Muslim woman participated in the Malino I process.

    In Malino II, a woman pastor and two Catholic

    women were chosen as representatives o the

    Christian community, and no women represented

    the Muslim community. In addition, the presence

    o these women in these peace talks did not neces-

    sarily mean issues o concern to women were

    brought to the table, as they had to submit to the

    Bell, Christ ine, Women address the problems o peace agreements,

    In, Coomaraswamy, Radhika and Fonseka, Dilruk shi (Eds.),Peace

    work: Women, armed conflict and negotiation, (India:Women

    Unlimited, ).

    Te Helsinki Memorandum o Understanding between the

    Government o the Republic o Indonesia and the Free Aceh

    Movement is available at www.aceh-mm.org/download/english/

    HelsinkiMoU.pd

    broader agenda o their male-dominated teams.

    Notably, not a single article in the Helsinki agree-

    ment and Malino agreements explicitly addresses

    gender issues.

    Womens limited participation in peacemaking

    reflects broader gender challenges in Indonesia.

    Tough the country has a strong matrilineal com-ponent to its traditional culture, this is mostly

    obscured by a narrow religious interpretation o

    womens roles in society. Tis conservative cultural

    context is exacerbated by a low level o awareness

    among women about their rights both at a national

    level and globally. Under such circumstances, it is

    difficult to encourage women to contribute to a

    higher political level o decision-making andor

    many (male) decision-makers to create or share

    political space to enable that to happen.As a

    result the process loses access to a wide range operspectives and acute understanding o the stakes

    involved in the violent conflict.

    Civil society

    Te record o representatives rom civil society in

    resolving conflict in Indonesia has been mixed. In

    many cases, they are an important bridge to the

    central government. For example, the Papua Peace

    Network (PPN) is leading an internal dialogue

    among civil society groups to prepare or eventualtalks on the uture o Papua, and ensure that the

    views o civil society are well represented in a

    potential dialogue process.

    Civil society representatives have also played an

    active role as peace and reconciliation actors at the

    grassroots level in the communal conflicts o

    Maluku and Central Sulawesi. In these conflicts,

    they were instrumental in delivering emergency

    aid to the IDPs and the affected communities. In

    addition, there were several initiatives rom villag-

    ers to set up local mechanisms to prevent conflict.For example, in Wayame village in Maluku, villag-

    ers created eam consisting o ten people rom

    the Muslim community and ten people rom the

    Christian community who were responsible or

    patrolling the village to ensure security and inves-

    tigating any rumours circulating in the village with

    See, Centre or Humanitarian Dialogue, Women at the Indonesian

    peace table: Enhancing the contributions o women to conflict resolu-

    tion, Report and policy recommendations with the Indonesian

    Institute o Sciences (Geneva: Centre or Humanitarian Dialogue,

    ) available in Bahasa Indonesia and English at www.hdcentre.org/

    projects/gender-amp-mediation/issues/women-peace-table--asia-pacific.

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    16/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia14

    the potential to incite conflict. Rules were also created

    and enorced in the village that included a prohibi-

    tion on making derogatory remarks about other

    religions and being involved in violence. Any villagers

    ound breaking the rules were punished accord-

    ingly or told to leave the village. Other civil society

    initiatives included providing education, incomegeneration or women and trauma counselling.

    However, Soehartos authoritarian legacy lim-

    ited civil societys ability to handle the challenging

    diversity o ethnic groups in Indonesia. His unity

    policy used a variety o legal and ideological methods

    to either curtail or regulate civil society, the most

    well-known o which was the Law on Social

    Organisations (Undang-Undang Organisasi

    Kemasyarakatan No. /, otherwise known as

    UU ORMAS). Under this law, all organisations had

    to adhere to the state ideology o Pancasila.With

    the removal o regulations controlling organisa-

    tional activities in , the number o NGOs and

    other civil society organisations increased at a rapid

    rate. However, many o these organisations are

    ragmented along sectoral lines with a lack o co-

    ordination between groups working on similar

    issues; many are weak organisationally; and there

    are very ew mechanisms through which these

    organisations can be held accountable to the com-

    munities which they endeavour to help or claimto represent.

    Observations

    Tough the conflicts in Maluku, Poso and Papua

    are clearly different rom each other, there are a

    number o common themes worth reflecting on

    not least because the conflict in Papua is ongoing

    and more needs to be done to ensure that peace in

    Maluku and Poso is sustained.

    A clear common challenge has been the appro-

    priate use o the security orces. Inexperienced in

    dealing with communal conflicts, the initial security

    response in Maluku and Poso exacerbated tensions.

    Te security orces aligned themselves with differ-

    ent sides in the conflict, allegedly supplying arms

    and ailing to arrest those who clearly violated the

    law. In Papua, human rights abuses by security

    Pancasila consists o five principles: Belie in the one and only God;

    just and civ ilised humanit y; unity o Indonesia ; democrac y guided

    by the inner wisdom in the una nimity arising out o deliberations

    amongst representatives; and, socia l justice or all.

    agencies and competition between them or control

    over natural resources has led to increased mistrust

    against the central government as well as migrants.

    However, at the same time, the lesson rom Maluku

    and Poso is that when the security orces are seen

    to enorce the law airly and arrest those known to

    be instigating violence, conflict can be reduced.Funds or development and humanitarian assis-

    tance should not be seen as a panacea. As violence

    escalated in Maluku and Poso, the central govern-

    ment and NGOs ocused on providing emergency

    aid, particularly to those displaced. While this was

    an essential humanitarian response, it was only

    when the central government began to address more

    undamental drivers o the conflict that violence

    subsided. Similarly in Papua, relying on develop-

    ment projects which suffer rom corruption and

    poor co-ordination within government has ailed

    to calm separatist sentiment. Indeed, uneven develop-

    ment is a conflict driver. Tis lesson applies equally

    to post-violence measures. Money was allocated in

    Maluku and Poso to rebuilding inrastructure at

    the expense o reconciliation and re-integration o

    the conflicting parties. Such intangibles are harder

    to address but essential or a lasting peace. Economic

    wellbeing should not be regarded as a substitute or

    political dialogue.

    Tese case studies also ask difficult questionsabout who is responsible or managing conflicts in

    Indonesia, reflecting an ongoing debate in govern-

    ment circles where there should be attempts to rame

    conflict management in a national law. District and

    provincial governments have occasionally been

    constructive but once violence escalates beyond a

    certain point, the central government needs to step

    in either as a acilitator o dialogue in a commu-

    nal context, or a participant in dialogue i they are

    party to the conflict.

    Better co-ordination within government is alsoneeded. Competition between provincial and dis-

    trict governments in Maluku and Poso weakened

    attempts to manage the conflict. In the case o

    Papua, while the Papua Desk o the Coordinating

    Ministry or Legal, Political and Security Affairs

    has the ormal mandate to deal with the region, at

    times other agencies like the Ministry o Home

    Affairs exercise greater power.

    Civil society representatives whether rom the

    NGO or religious community have an importantrole in prodding reluctant state authorities to take

    action. It took a Christian leader, Pastor ubondo,

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    17/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 15

    to persuade Jusu Kalla to help mediate the conflict

    in Poso. In Papua, LIPI has built up support within

    government or dialogue starting with its

    proposal Te Papua Road Map.Tis has been

    complemented by the work o a Papuan Catholic

    pastor, Father Neles ebay, who has promoted dia-

    logue within the Papuan community and with thecentral government in Jakarta. In all this, public

    participation is critical. Peace in Maluku and Poso

    is less secure than it could be because the Malino I

    and II agreements were elite agreements made

    without any involvement o the public a lesson

    which should be heeded by those involved in dia-

    logue in Papua.

    Widjojo, Muridan, (Ed.), Papua Road Map: Negotiating the Past,

    Improving the Present and Securing the Future, (Jakarta: YOI, Yayasan

    IFA, LIPI, ).

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    18/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia16

    Conflict and violence in

    Maluku: Resolution and

    management approaches

    Introduction

    Te violent conflict in Maluku, largely concentrated

    in Ambon, was one o the most devastating to break

    out afer the all o the Soeharto regime. Te con-

    flict claimed almost , lives rom to

    and displaced a third o the population o Maluku

    and North Maluku.Beore the outbreak o the

    religious communal conflict in Ambon city, there

    were several inter-religious skirmishes in other

    parts o Indonesia. In November , riots broke

    out in Ketapang, north Jakarta, between Christian

    Ambonesepreman, or thugs, and Muslims. It was

    reported that afer the riots, almost Ambonese

    premanwere shipped back to Maluku by the Indo-

    nesian Navy. According to witnesses in Ambon, the

    preman acted as provocateurs o the first outbreak

    o violence.In December , in several areas in

    Ambon, fights and arson attacks occurred between

    Christian and Muslim villages, ofen triggered bythe Indonesian Military (NI). On January , ,

    there were riots between Christians and Muslims

    in Dobo in southeast Maluku.

    Brown, Graham., Wilson, Christopher and Hadi, Suprayoga.,

    Overcoming Violent Conflict: Peace and Development Analysis in

    Maluku and North Maluku, Vol. , Bappenas, (Jakarta: United

    Nations Development Programme and Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan

    Indonesia, ).

    Van Klin ken, Gerr y, What caused the Ambon violence?, Inside

    Indonesia, No. (). See also: Aditjondro, Di Balik Asap Mesiu,

    Air Mata dan Anyi r Darah di Ma luku, In Salampessy, Zairin and

    Husain, Tamrin (Eds.), Ketika Semerbak Cengkih ergusur Asap

    Mesiu, (Jakarta:APAK Ambon, ).

    Te most requently cited trigger to the conflict

    in Ambon is the event on January during the

    Muslim holiday o Idul Fitri. A petty dispute broke

    out between a Christian youth rom Mardika, a district

    in Ambon city, and a Muslim youth rom Batumerah,a village next to Mardika. Rumours that exacerbated

    pre-existing divisions between Christian and Muslim

    communities began, drawing surrounding villages

    into the violence. Initially, fighting was mainly between

    Ambon Christians and Muslim immigrants rom

    South Sulawesi (Bugis, Buton and Makassar), with

    each launching surprise attacks against the other.

    Conflict drivers

    Te conflict in Maluku is ofen portrayed in terms

    o longstanding animosities between Muslims and

    Christians, although the reality is more complex.

    As a result o European involvement in the spice

    trade in the thcentury, nearly hal o the Maluku

    population today are Christians (. percent accord-

    ing to the census); compared to the rest o

    Indonesia where per cent o the population is

    Muslim. More than years o Dutch colonialism

    divided Maluku society along religious lines, both

    geographically and socially.

    raditional practicesare thought to have kept tensions between Christians

    and Muslims in a relatively stable state until the

    s.Pela Gandong,a village alliance system

    Panggabean, Samsu, Maluku: Te Challenge o Peace, In van

    Deveen, Hans (Ed.), Searching or Peace in Asia Pacific, (Boulder:

    Lynne Rienner Publication, ).

    International Crisis Group, Indonesia: Overcoming Murder and Chaos

    in Maluku, Asia Report No. , (Jakarta / Brussels: ICG, ).

    Bartels, Dieter, Your God is No Longer Mine: Muslim-Christian

    Fratricide in the Central Moluccas afer a Hal-Millennium o

    olerant Co-Existence and Ethnic Unity, In Pannell, S andra (Ed.),

    A State o Emergency: Violence , Society and the State in Eastern

    Indonesia, (Darwin: Northern erritory University Press, ).

    Case Study One

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    19/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 17

    unique to the Central Maluku, bound Muslim and

    Christian villages together and played a pivotal role

    in traditional social relationships and the experi-

    ence o cultural identity.

    Maluku underwent many social changes during

    Soehartos rule. Te apparent peaceul relationship

    between Christians and Muslims was only super-

    ficial. Dutch colonialism led to Christians being

    granted greater access to education and political

    office, while Muslims made up the majority o traders

    and business people. Following the government

    policy o transmigration that began in s, and

    voluntary migration rom Bugis, Buton and Makassar

    that grew in the s, the population o Maluku

    became increasingly Muslim. In , Soeharto

    ounded the Indonesian Association o Muslim

    Intellectuals (Ikatan Cendekiawan Muslim Indonesia,

    or ICMI) as a means o securing political support

    rom Islamic groups as his power within the mili-

    tary aded. Soeharto intended ICMI to be a counter-balance to the military. Te ICMI became an increas-

    ingly important source o individuals or important

    government positions, including in Maluku. In ,

    M. Akib Latuconsina, ICMI director in Maluku

    was appointed governor. He was the first native

    Malukan and the first civilian to hold the post,

    which was usually occupied by military officers

    rom Java. By all o the bupati, or district chies,

    in the province were Muslims. Tese changes antago-

    nised the Christian population and urther divided

    Maluku along religious lines.

    Evolution of the conflict

    In the early stage o the conflict, the target o vio-

    lence were Muslim migrants rom Bugis, Buton

    and Makassar, a group whose dominant position

    in the employment market and inormal labour

    sector (e.g. market merchants) generated resentment.

    Afer the large-scale exodus o those migrants, the

    conflict spread to other parts o Maluku and became

    more overtly religious. Te flare up o violence wasaggravated by rumours surrounding religious sym-

    bols such as attacks on mosques and churches.

    Courtesy of the UN OCHA Regional Office for Asia-Pacific, 2011.

    Figure 1: Map of Maluku

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    20/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia18

    Women and children were also involved in the vio-

    lence, quickly learning to make spears, machetes,

    arrows, and bombs.

    Te conflict in Maluku subsided in May as

    attention shifed to the start o the general electioncampaign. Te Indonesian Democratic Party

    Struggle (PDI-P) won the election in Ambon.

    Te PDI-P was a reormulation o the Indonesian

    Democratic Party (PDI) that used five political

    parties, including the Indonesian Christian Party

    (PARKINDO). Historically, PARKINDO was sup-

    ported by the Ambonese Christian community

    and hence PDI-P was perceived as the Christian

    party in Maluku. Violence re-erupted in Ambon

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with the Director o LAPPAN (Institute o

    Woman and Children Empowerment), Ambon City, November .

    in July when PDI-Ps election victory was

    announced. Maluku was on the brink o a civil

    war. People mobilised to deend their religion and

    orchestrated violence against anyone o a different

    religion. Many villages took part in the fighting. Tesecurity orces were also divided along religious lines

    and were thereore unable to perorm their tasks

    competently. Te peak o the conflict was the attack

    on Silo Church and obelo massacre on Decem-

    ber, .Te Silo church in the centre o Ambon

    city was one o the biggest Maluku Protestant

    Churches (Gereja Protestan Maluku,or GPM) and

    was burnt to the ground the day afer Christmas.

    Te same day, almost Muslims in the mosque

    at obelo village in North Maluku province were

    International Crisis Group ().

    Box 1: The chronology of the conflict in Maluku

    1999 January Small scale street fights escalate into r iots in Ambon city and its surroundings.

    March Mass violence spreads to other islands in Maluku.

    May The general election campaign begins and violence declines.

    June General election.

    July Mass violence restarts in Ambon city.

    October North Maluku Province separated from Maluku Province.

    December Conflict escalates after Silo church is burned and a massacre takes place in the Muslim village

    of Tobelo in North Maluku.

    2000 May Laskar Jihad arrives in Ambon.

    June Massacre in Galela near Tobelo in North Maluku.

    Police weapons stolen and distributed to civilians.

    Civil emergency declared in Maluku and North Maluku and thousands of troops deployed.

    December Maluku Front Sovereignty (FKM) declares independence of the Republic of South Maluku (RMS).

    2001 January The armys joint battalion (Yongab) conducts a sweeping operation targeting strongholds of

    Muslim groups.

    June Yongab conducts another sweeping operation.

    2002 February Malino Peace Agreement (Malino II) was signed.

    April The Malukan provincial government office was burned.

    Soya village is attacked, after which violence began to decline in Maluku.

    May The leader of Laskar Jihad, Jafar Umar Talib, and the FKM, Alex Manuputti, both arrested.

    October Laskar Jihad is dissolved in Maluku.

    2003 May Civil emergency lifted from North Maluku province.

    September Civil emergency lifted from Maluku Province.

    2004 April FKM raised the RMS flag, prompting riots in Ambon city which left 40 dead.

    June General election.

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    21/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 19

    killed by Christians. Tose attacks were in turn

    used to call on Christians and Muslims to engage

    in urther violent conflict, which the military could

    do little to contain.

    During this period, many villages were attacked,churches and mosques destroyed, and civilians killed

    and displaced. Te inability o the Indonesian cen-

    tral government and military to control the conflict

    gave groups outside Maluku the opportunity to

    exploit the situation. On January , afer the

    massacre in obelo, more than , Muslims held

    a protest in Jakarta at LapanganMonas(National

    Monument Stadium), calling or ajihadin Maluku.

    Te protest was organised by Muslim political par-

    ties and Muslim organisations. One o the Muslim

    organisations, called Forum Komunikasi AhluSunnah wal-Jamaah(FKAWJ) led by Jaar Umar

    Talib, held a large meeting at Senayan Stadium on

    April and created Laskar Jihad, a Muslim

    militia group.In May , this Java-based Muslim

    militia announced they were launching ajihadin

    Maluku and began sending its members to the

    province. Tey stole more than weapons roma police weapons store in June and subsequently

    committed requent attacks on police officers. Both

    Laskar Jihad and the military supplied weapons to

    Muslim civilians, which allowed the conflict to

    escalate. Te dynamics o the conflict changed sig-

    nificantly, with more Christian than Muslim villages

    attacked. A state o civil emergency was declared

    on June and a large military contingent

    For more inormation on Laskar Jihad, see Noorhaidi, Hasan, Faith

    and Politics: Te Rise o the Laskar Jihad in t he Era o ransition in

    Indonesia, Indonesia, Vol. , Apri l, (), pp.-.

    An Indonesian soldier stands guard above a village destroyed by fighting between Muslims and Christians in Ambon, January 14, 2000.

    AP Photo/Achmad Ibrahim

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    22/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia20

    deployed in Maluku at the time there were army

    battalions and two battalions o paramilitary police

    though neither the army nor the police were suc-

    cessul in controlling the situation.

    Te Governments inability to contain the con-

    flict allowed or the emergence o Maluku Front

    Sovereignty (FKM) in , a movement which drewupon the legacy o the Republic o South Maluku

    (RMS). RMS was ormed in and advocated

    separatism rom a predominantly Muslim state.

    Te RMS was thus perceived as a Christian move-

    ment exacerbating the inter-religious dynamics o

    the conflict.

    A number o actors contributed to the decline

    in violence by the end o . Prolonged attacks had

    segregated communities, making it more logisti-

    cally difficult or Muslims and Christians to attack

    each other. A special joint battalion, Yongab, madeup o special orces rom the army, navy and air

    orce, conducted operations primarily against Laskar

    Jihad, including against their base. Finally, Malukans

    ofen say they simply grew tired o the fighting.

    Te central government initiated peace talks

    between the Christian and Muslim communities

    which, in February , culminated in the Malino II

    peace agreement. Sporadic violence and bombing

    continued (including attacks on the regional parlia-

    ment and the governors office) but decreased in

    requency and intensity so much that the state o

    civil emergency was lifed in Maluku in .

    Another important turning point was the attack in

    April on the village o Soya, in which people

    died and houses were bombed.Residents o

    Soya were Christians and had presumed that they

    were sae rom attack because o their distance rom

    Muslim communities. An investigation revealed

    that Kopassus (NI special orces) and a Christian

    All figures in this paragraph on the number o security personnel

    are sourced rom: Yanuarti, Sri., Nusa Bhakti, Ikrar and Nurhasim,

    Mochamad,Military Politic s, Ethnicity and Conflict in Indonesia,

    Centre or Research on Inequality, Human Security a nd Ethnicity,

    Working Paper No. ().

    Te FKM was ormed on July by Alex Manuputti in Kudamati,

    Ambon. It was initially ormed to boost the morale o the locals at the

    height o the conflict when the role o the state was weak. However, it

    did not receive much local support, with only several hundred active

    members among the provinces population. Tis prompted Alex

    Manuputti to use the old political flag o RMS to ront the FKM. Te

    Republic o the South Moluccas (RMS) was promoted by the Dutch

    to undermine opposition to its colonial rule immediately a fer World

    War II. It was a predominantly Christian organisation and advocated

    or Maluku to be separated rom the Republic o Indonesia.

    Sinar Harapan,Belasan Preman Pelaku Pengeboman di Ambon,

    October, ().

    gang committed the attack, not Muslims as had

    been previously assumed.According to many

    observers, Kopassus tried to extend the conflict by

    hiring a Christian gang to conduct the attack.

    Indeed, Berty Loupatty, one o the leaders o the

    Christianpreman, conessed that the Soya attack

    was in act a Kopassus order.

    Tis gave Christiansand Muslims a common cause in their resentment

    o the army. A shared sense o victimhood decreased

    the level o communal conflict.

    Later incidents did not spark mass violence in

    the same way as they had in the past. In April ,

    more than people died in rioting ollowing the

    raising o the RMS flag at the home o the FKM

    leader.Rioting erupted again in Ambon city but

    subsided within one week. Following this riot,

    minor bombings occurred but did not provoke a

    violent reaction rom the local community.

    Conflict management actors

    and initiatives

    Various efforts were undertaken to end the conflict,

    including those led by security orces; central and

    local government; international and local NGOs;

    and local community and womens groups. wo

    broad approaches to conflict management in Maluku

    emerge rom these efforts: the security and emer-gency approach; and the recovery and development

    approach. Conflict management beore the Malino

    Peace Agreement in February (Malino II) was

    mostly reactive. Tere was no strategic or long-

    term planning by either the Government nor civil

    society. Te main conflict management tools used

    were the delivery o aid and security, relying heavily

    on the military which had been mobilised rom

    outside Maluku. Malino II was a significant turn-

    ing point which marked a shif to the recovery and

    development approach. Afer the Malino II peace

    process, the central and local government turned

    to legal instruments arresting and prosecuting

    those holding weapons and committing attacks

    and ocused on long-term development and

    Muhammad, Najib, Security sector reorm, democratic transition,

    and social violence: Te case o Ambon, Indonesia, Bergho Research

    Center or Constructive Conflict Management, (Berlin: Bergho

    Research Center or Constructive C onflict Management, ).

    Muhammad, Najib (), p..

    International Crisis Group, Indonesia: Violence Erupts Again in Ambon,

    Asia Report No., (Jakar ta/Brussels: ICG, ).

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    23/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 21

    recovery planning. Civil society also shifed their

    approach rom the provision o emergency assist-

    ance to development and recovery.

    The emergency and security

    approach to conflict management

    Government initiatives Pre-Malino II

    Beore the Government initiated the Malino peace

    talks, there were several unsuccessul attempts at

    conflict resolution by the local government. For

    example, the Maluku Governor set up an inormal

    team o religious leaders, eam , at the end o

    January . Te team was composed o six leaders

    rom the Muslim, Catholic, and Protestant commu-

    nities. Teir mandate was to prevent the destruc-

    tion o churches, mosques and homes, and to stop

    widespread violence in Ambon city. However, the

    leaders selected by the Governor were not seriously

    committed to peace indeed, some suspect that they

    were even complicit in the violence. In addition,

    given the decentralised decision-making structure

    within the Muslim community, it was difficult to

    select representatives with genuine authority across

    Maluku. Unsurprisingly, eam had no effect on

    conflict resolution or management.

    Aid distribution was also problematic. Te localgovernment had stocks o ood supplies and other

    basic necessities but could not distribute it without

    military support. However, the reliance on the mil-

    itary to distribute the aid ofen led to its disappear-

    ance. Tere were claims that the military itsel had

    no proper logistical support. Te breakdown o the

    structure o government during the conflict meant

    there was no leadership to provide directives on

    where and how the distribution o emergency aid

    should be carried out. Te segregation o Muslim

    and Christian communities posed a urther chal-lenge to the distribution o the aid.

    Te Government attempted to respond militar-

    ily to the growing violence. During the early stages

    o the conflict, between January and March ,

    the Government deployed , security personnel,

    both rom the mobile brigade (Brimob) o the police

    and rom the military, to Maluku. On May ,

    the Maluku District Military Command (Korem

    Maluku) was upgraded to a Regional Military

    Command (Kodam) under the leadership o a brig-adier general, a move which gave the military both

    greater status and a greater budget in Maluku. In

    November the number o security personnel

    was increased to ,, including officers rom the

    new Regional Military Command (Kodam). In

    January , the military and Brimoborces were

    increased to five battalions (, personnel).

    However, this increased orce did not lead to a decline

    in violence, not least because o the militarys inex-perience with communal conflict. Te military was

    not trained or conflicts in which the concept o

    the enemy was ambiguous and did not know what

    actions to take when the two religious communities

    were engaged in fighting.

    In June , rising violence, driven by the infil-

    tration o Laskar Jihad, led to a civil emergency

    being declared in Maluku and even more police

    and military troops being deployed to the province.

    However, poor civil-military co-ordination proved

    to be a significant barrier to reducing the level oviolence. According to the law that governs emer-

    gency rule (Law /), it is the responsibility o

    governors to restore order in an emergency situation

    and they have the authority to use the resources at

    their disposal. However, neither the Governor nor

    the district head in Maluku was able to command

    the security orces, who worked only under the

    direction o their central command. While there

    was some degree o co-ordination between the secu-

    rity orces and local government, it was not suffi-cient or both to respond effectively and promptly

    to emergency situations. Te civil emergency in

    north Maluku province lasted until May and

    the civil emergency lasted until September in

    Maluku province.

    Security forces: in-fighting between

    the military and police

    Tere were significant co-ordination problems

    within the security orces, particularly between the

    military and the police.Te ineffectiveness o the

    police and military stems in part rom the struc-

    tural changes that these agencies underwent dur-

    ing the transition to democracy. Te reorms that

    ollowed Soeharto stepping down gave the police

    the responsibility or internal security and greater

    All figures in this paragraph on the number o security personnel

    are sourced rom: Yanuarti, Sri et al ().

    Muhammad, Nazib, Violence in Between, In Kingsbury, Damien

    (Ed.), Conflict and Security in Archipelagic Southeast Asia,Monash

    Asia Institute (Melbourne: Monash Asia Institute, ).

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    24/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia22

    resources than they had previously, but the military

    continued to assert its primacy, seeking to retain

    both its authority and budget. So, while the divi-

    sion o labour and relations between the military

    and police was defined on paper, in reality it was

    more fluid. Indeed, there was even active fighting

    between the NI (military) and Polri(police). InJuly , an exchange o weapons fire took place

    between personnel rom Battalion (Kodam

    Diponegoroand Kodam Brawijaya) and personnel

    rom Brimobin which at least one police officer died.

    Te perceived partiality o the security orces inevents such as the attack on Soya village bred dis-

    trust amongst locals and though such involvement

    has been officially denied by both the military and

    the police, the results o various investigations sug-

    gest otherwise.Te police stationed in Maluku

    were mainly locally recruited and, unsurprisingly,

    demonstrated affiliations with their respective ellow

    Muslims and Christians. As or the military units,

    although they were deliberately mixed and regularly

    rotated rom one area to the other, soldiers became

    acquainted with the villagers they deended andwere ofen given ood, drinks and cigarettes by

    those villagers. It was not unusual, when clashes

    took place, or the soldiers to side with the people

    they had been meeting on a daily basis with the

    result that Muslim soldiers sometimes deended

    Muslim villages against Christian attacks and

    Christian soldiers deended their riends against

    Muslim attacks.In the second phase o the Maluku

    conflict, some military personnel were even sup-

    plying weapons and ammunition to the warring

    parties.Soldiers were said to have paid or their

    ood with bullets and, according to an Ambonese

    member o the Peoples Representative Council (DPR):

    Te ammunition and guns are sold by soldiers who

    need money to live.

    Yanuarti , Sri et al (), p..

    APOL, KOPASSUS and the Maluku Crisis,Online bulletin, January-

    February ().

    International Crisis Group, Indonesia: Te search or peace in Maluku,

    Asia Report No. , (Jakarta/Brussels: ICG ).

    Yanuarti , Sri et al (), p..

    Internat ional Crisis Group (), p..

    Extortion by the security orces also tarnished

    their reputation in Maluku. At the peak o the con-

    flict, neither religious leaders nor government rep-

    resentatives could pass through areas dominated

    by one religious group without protection rom the

    security orces. As the Secretary o Ambon City

    put it: I I wanted to make a visit, I needed to asksecurity orces to accompany me. Without their pro-

    tection, I could not have gone anywhere during the

    conflict. Security personnel exploited the situa-

    tion, demanding protection money in return or

    sae passage. One resident complained that to travel

    back and orth rom Ambon city to visit his amily

    security orces sometimes asked me to pay a very

    expensive price. I paid because there was no other

    option. . . the security orces benefited rom the

    conflict.

    The non-governmental sector

    As the local government was unable to operate during

    the emergency period, international and local NGOs

    attempted to fill the vacuum. NGOs were critical

    providers o humanitarian aid, predominantly

    sanitation, medical care and basic necessities par-

    ticularly to the IDPs. As donors and international

    NGOs had difficulty accessing conflict-affected

    areas, local NGOs played an important role in the

    distribution o the aid. Following the riot in January, local NGOs in Ambon created a consortium

    called the Maluku Social Humanitarian Voluntary

    eam (im Relawan Kemanusiaan Social Maluku,

    IRUS), which operated out o a Catholic NGOs office.

    Prior to the conflict, there were approximately

    ten NGOs in Ambon and they ofen transcended

    religious differences. However, the conflict produced

    religiously segregated local NGOs,each providing

    aid to their respective communities. Aid was pro-

    vided less according to a systematic assessment o

    needs and more to areas where particular NGOs

    could gain access.

    In the period beore the Malino agreement was

    signed, international NGOs and UN agencies par-

    ticularly ocused on humanitarian aid rather than

    any peacebuilding activities.As well as providing

    assistance to communities directly, they unded

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with a ormer secretary o Ambon City,

    July .

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with residents o Kebon Cengkeh, Ambon

    City, September .

    Brown, Graham et al ().

    While the division of labour and relations

    between the military and police was defined

    on paper, in reality it was more fluid.

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    25/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 23

    local NGOs and ran capacity-building programmes

    to improve local governance. Efforts were made to try

    and provide an incentive or religious co-operation.

    For example, the UNDPs Community Recovery

    Program provided unds to local NGOs on the condi-

    tion that Christian and Muslim NGOs collaborate.

    However, local government officials claimed that

    international organisations did not co-ordinate

    their activities with them, which led to overlapping

    assistance in IDP camps.

    Efforts from the local community to

    resolve the conflict

    Beore the arrival o emergency aid in Ambon

    rom the central government and international

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with ormer staff o Lakspesdam NU

    (Nahdlatul Ulama), Ambon City, July .

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with ormer staff o Bapedda (Badan

    Perencanaan Penbangunan Daerah) Province Maluku, Ambon City,

    July .

    agencies, local communities relied heavily on their

    religious institutions or assistance. As the residents

    o Warigin in Ambon city put it: We assisted and

    supported one another by sharing ood supplies and

    other basic necessities, and accepting IDPs into our

    houses. No one helped us or a long time. We survived

    by ourselves until emergency aid came.Among

    Christian communities, the churches unctioned

    as distribution centres or emergency aid.Help

    within Muslim communities was less institution-alised, with mosques unctioning as little more than

    a shelter or Muslims.

    At this stage o the conflict, peace was consid-

    ered a taboo word within most communities. Tose

    who talked o peace were ofen treated as enemies,

    limiting their ability to start peace processes.

    Nevertheless, there were several examples o success-

    Focus group discussion with inhabitants o Warigin in Ambon City,

    November .

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with a pastor at Silo church in Ambon

    City, July .

    Ambonese demand the UN intervene in renewed fighting between Christians and Muslims in Jakar ta, May 22, 2000.

    REUTERS/Darren Whiteside

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    26/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia24

    ul conflict prevention at the grassroots level. A

    strong example is the case o eam in Wayame

    village, which maintained peaceul co-existence

    between both its Christians and Muslims villagers.

    eam , which was composed o ten Christians

    and ten Muslims, was responsible or veriying any

    inormation aimed at provoking fighting betweenthe two religious communities. Tey also enorced

    rules in the village prohibiting villagers rom taking

    part in the fighting, misusing religious symbols, con-

    suming alcohol and making derogatory remarks

    about religion. Both the pastors and Muslim religious

    leaders played a critical role in promoting religious

    tolerance, constantly telling the local community

    that it was not a conflict o religion. eam also

    created a market that was accessible to both reli-

    gious communities. Tis not only demonstrated

    the harmonious relations between the Christiansand Muslims but was also important or the eco-

    nomic survival o the village during the conflict.

    Te Baku BaePeace Movement was another

    notable conflict management initiative that helped

    to orge a common identity between both groups, as

    victims o violence. Baku Baeis a phrase indigenous

    to Maluku which is commonly used by children to

    restore riendship afer a misunderstanding or

    quarrel. In the context o Malukus conflict, Baku

    Baemeans ceasing the violence.

    It was a moreaccepted term than peace at the height o the

    conflict. Te movement was developed and built by

    a number o civil society actors in Ambon includ-

    ing scholars, NGO activists, lawyers, journalists,

    religious representatives, and village and traditional

    leaders (raja). It was acilitated by peace activists rom

    Jakarta. Human rights NGOs rom Jakarta, such as

    the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation (Yayasan

    Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia, YLBHI),

    Jakarta Legal Aid Institute (LBH Jakarta) and the

    Commission or Missing Persons and Victims oViolence (Kontras), that supported the Baku Bae

    movement conducted research in Ambon and con-

    cluded the conflict was less about inherent religious

    Comments on the workshop by ormer pastor in Wayame village,

    one o the leaders o eam , Ambon City, October . Also

    see, Horiba, Aki ko, Community Mechanism in Wayame on Ambon

    Conflict, In, Peoples Survival Strategy: Success Stories in Conflict

    (Poso, angkura village and Ambon, Wayame Village), Research

    Report, (Jakarta: Institut itian Perdamaian, ).

    Ichsan, Malik,Bakubae: the community based movement or recon-

    ciliation process in Maluku, Bakubae Maluku, ia Foundation and

    Yayasan Kemala, (Jakarta: Bak ubae Maluku, ia and Kemala, ).

    differences and more about the militarys negative

    role in exploiting religious sentiment. Tese NGOs

    then held a series o workshops in Jakarta in

    or Maluku religious leaders, village heads, adat

    leaders, NGO activists, lawyers and journalists that

    addressed the causes o the conflict and explored ways

    to orge a common agenda. Tese workshops, andthe research undertaken by the human rights NGOs

    rom Jakarta, helped engender a shif rom looking

    at each other as enemises and fighting each other to

    all being victims and blaming the government.

    One o the achievements o the workshops was

    to establish the Maluku Media Centre (MMC)

    which housed Christian and Muslim journalists

    who had been trained in Baku Baeworkshops. Upon

    their return to Ambon, they spread the idea o

    peace journalism and encouraged other journalists

    to avoid writing or reporting provocative news.

    Role of the media

    In conflict situations, the media can be used as a

    peacebuilding tool as well as an instigator o vio-

    lence. During the conflict in Ambon city, the media

    (newspapers, radio and the internet) played a part

    in promoting the violence. In addition, the media

    were divided along religious lines and were used to

    disseminate rumours and alse inormation. For

    example, the conflict led to the division o a local

    newspaper, Suara Maluku, into Suara Maluku(or

    a Christian audience) and theAmbon Express(or

    Muslims). Provocative inormation that was not

    verified was ofen published in both papers. Te

    radio and the internet had also triggered violence

    during the Ambon conflict. Laskar Jihad had its

    own radio station Suara Perjuangan Muslim

    Maluku(Maluku Muslim Voice o Struggle) and

    website (www.laskarjihad.or.id), which allegedly

    became a tool or mobilising Muslims to carry outviolent attacks and spreading the groups propa-

    ganda about the conflict.Christians and Muslims

    also criticised each others cruel killings and arson

    attacks on the internet.

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with a ormer vice director o YLBHI

    (Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia / Te Legal Aid

    Foundation Indonesia), Jakarta, August .

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with a journalist rom elevisi Republik

    Indonesia / V Indonesia, Ambon City, September .

    See: Brauchler, Birgit, Cyberidentities at War: Religion, Identity, and

    the Internet in the Moluccas Conflict, Indonesia,No. (New York:

    Columbia University, ), pp.-.

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    27/73

    An Analysis of the Conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso 25

    Tere are some examples o the media being

    used as a peacebuilding tool during the conflict.

    Te Baku Baepeace movement held workshops to

    raise awareness o the importance o ending the vio-

    lence in Maluku as well as workshops or journalists

    on peace journalism training and subsequently

    created the MMC. It was comprised o both Muslimand Christian journalists and became a way or

    them to exchange and veriy inormation with

    their counterparts rom across the religious divide,

    which had previously been impossible. Tis resulted

    in more objective reporting o the conflict.

    Roles of women

    Women occupy an influential role in the amily.

    As wives, women can persuade their husbands

    not to engage in the conflict and as mothers,women can educate their children not to be

    prejudiced against other religions.

    Women played active roles in peacemaking efforts

    in Ambon. Inter-religious meetings among women

    IDPs not only ensured the distribution o emergency

    aid to IDPs, but also became an avenue or recon-

    ciliation between the Muslim and Christian women.

    Womens leadership in organizing inter-religious

    meetings among displaced women was a notable

    achievement in Maluku. Te shared identity omotherhood was an entry point or inter-religious

    discussions. Expressing shared concerns about

    their childrens saety and uture, ood, education,

    medical care and other basic necessities, helped

    bind women rom the two religious communities

    together: Women create a culture o peace. Women

    can ease the tension through singing and dancing.

    Women have a big role to play in conflict manage-

    ment, concluded one activist.

    Women, however, were most active at the grass-roots level. One strong example is the Caring Womens

    Movement (Gerakan Perempuan Peduli, GPP) ormed

    in September by more than Muslim, Protes-

    tant and Catholic women activists. Tey organised

    rallies against violence in Maluku even when the

    conflict was at its peak. Tey also had meetings

    For more inormation on the MMC, reer to www.malukumedia

    centre.org/

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with a Christian representative to the

    Malino Peace Agreement, Ambon, August .

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with a Christian representative to the

    Malino Peace Agreement, Ambon, August .

    with government and security officials, religious

    leaders and youths , as well as training women vol-

    unteers in the field on mediation and counselling.

    GPP also co-operated with other womens organi-

    sations in Maluku.

    Tere was less participation by women in ormal

    high-level peacemaking in Maluku. For Malino II,a emale pastor and two Catholic women were cho-

    sen as representatives o the Christian community,

    while there were no Muslim women representatives.

    Te difference is partly because, while women

    pastors or Catholic nuns played a significant role

    as leaders o the Christian community, the role o

    women in the Muslim community was less visible.

    Although some women in Ambon were involved

    in bomb-making and instigating violence, sponta-

    neous womens initiatives mostly brought about many

    positive results. In Ambon, the reconciliation pro-cess between women rom the two religious commu-

    nities began at the market. Women, both Muslims

    and Christians, regularly braved the violence to

    travel to the market, ofen located in Ambon city,

    to purchase ood items or to sell their produce. For

    example, women known asjibu-jibu,travelled

    rom the Muslim village o Sirisori to the Christian

    village o Owu to sell their produce, even during the

    conflict.Teir efforts were aided by the perception

    that women are less threatening, making it easieror them to enter and travel through areas domi-

    nated by the other religion. While these efforts

    may have been driven more by basic needs than

    conscious attempts at conflict resolution, they laid

    the oundation or more ormal reconciliation ini-

    tiatives. In addition, due to interaction between the

    women rom different religious communities, they

    became messengers or their larger communities.

    Tis put them in a good position to veriy or dispel

    rumours and prevent acts o provocation.

    The Malino Peace Agreement

    Te central government led the peace process very

    short by comparative standards that culminated

    in the signing o the Malino II peace agreement on

    February in the highlands o Malino in

    Interview by Akiko Horiba with a womens rights activist rom

    Komnas HAM (National Human Rig hts Commission) in Ambon,

    November .

    For more inormat ion on the role o women in the Maluku peace

    process, see C entre or Humanitarian Dia logue, ().

  • 8/13/2019 Conflict Management in Indonesia An Analysis of the Conflicts Maluku, Papua and Poso

    28/73

    Conflict Management in Indonesia26

    Box 2: The Malino II Agreeement

    The Malino II Agreement comprised of 11 points:

    1. End all conflicts and disputes;

    2. Abide by due process of law enforcement. Existing

    security officers are obliged to be professional in

    exercising their mission;

    3. Reject and oppose all kinds of separatist movements,

    among others the Republic of South Moluccas (RMS);

    4. The people of the Moluccas have the right to stay

    and work legally and fairly in Indonesia nationwide

    and vice versa;

    5. Ban and disarm illegal armed organizations, groups,

    or militias, in accordance with the existing law. Outside

    parties that disturb the peace will be expelled from

    the Moluccas;

    6. Establish a national independent investigation team

    to investigate among others, the tragic incident on

    January 19, 1999, the Moluccas Sovereign Front,

    Republic of South Moluccas, Christian Republic of

    South Moluccas, jihad warrior (laskar jihad), Christ

    Warrior, coercive conversion, and human rights

    violations;

    7. Call for the voluntary return of refugees to their homes,

    and the return of properties;

    8. Rehabilitate mental, social, economic and public

    infrastructures, particularly educational, health,

    religious, and housing facilities;

    9. To preserve law and order for the people in the area,

    it is absolutely necessary for the military and the

    police to maintain coordination and firmness in

    executing their function and mission. In line with this,

    a number of military and police facilities must be

    rebuilt and re-equipped;

    10. Uphold good relationships and the harmony among

    all elements of believers in the Moluccas, all efforts of

    evangelism must highly honour the diversity and

    acknowledge local culture;

    11. Support the rehabilitation of Pattimura University for

    common progress, as such, the recruitment system

    and other policies will be transparently implemented

    based on the principle of fairness while upholding the

    necessary standard.

    Adap