Overall Conference Feedback Analysis

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 44

CRITERIAS FOR EVALUATION NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 1 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 2 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 3 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 4 AVERAGE SUM

Training Structure 0 0 1 43 3.97727272727273 44

Training Content 0 0 11 33 3.75 44

Quality of Handouts 0 0 3 41 3.93181818181818 44

Topics Covered Were Relevant To Me 0 0 7 37 3.84090909090909 44

Each Session Length 0 0 11 33 3.75 44

Pace of Training 0 0 5 39 3.88636363636364 44

Exercise in Classroom 0 0 8 36 3.81818181818182 44

Venue 0 0 4 40 3.90909090909091 44

Food Arrangements 0 6 8 30 3.54545454545455 44

I Learnt Something Useful 0 0 15 29 3.65909090909091 44

Im Glad I Came 0 0 3 41 3.93181818181818 44

Overall Verdict 0 0 4 40 3.90909090909091 44

Total Average 3.825

The Analysis is on the Basis of a Rating Scale, with 1 Being The Lowest and 4 Being The Highest

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 44

CRITERIAS FOR EVALUATION NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 1 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 2 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 3 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 4 AVERAGE SUM

Training Objectives Clearly Defined 0 0 9 35 3.79545454545455 44

Training Content 0 0 9 35 3.79545454545455 44

Quality of Handouts 0 0 7 37 3.84090909090909 44

Interaction Encouraged 0 0 9 35 3.79545454545455 44

The Trainer is Knowledgeable 0 0 9 35 3.79545454545455 44

Trainer Was Well Prepared 0 1 9 34 3.75 44

I Learnt Something Useful 0 0 9 35 3.79545454545455 44

10

Total Average 3.795

Speaker Evaluation : Professor Suresh Pai

The Analysis is on the Basis of a Rating Scale, with 1 Being The Lowest and 4 Being The Highest

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 44

CRITERIAS FOR EVALUATION NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 1 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 2 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 3 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 4 AVERAGE SUM

Training Objectives Clearly Defined 0 1 5 38 3.84090909090909 44

Training Content 0 0 5 39 3.88636363636364 44

Quality of Handouts 0 1 6 37 3.81818181818182 44

Interaction Encouraged 0 0 8 36 3.81818181818182 44

The Trainer is Knowledgeable 0 0 3 41 3.93181818181818 44

Trainer Was Well Prepared 0 0 5 39 3.88636363636364 44

I Learnt Something Useful 0 1 5 38 3.84090909090909 44

Total Average 3.86

Speaker Evaluation : Prof. Nishal Pinto

The Analysis is on the Basis of a Rating Scale, with 1 Being The Lowest and 4 Being The Highest

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 44

CRITERIAS FOR EVALUATION NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 1 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 2 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 3 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 4 AVERAGE SUM

Training Objectives Clearly Defined 0 0 4 40 3.90909090909091 44

Training Content 0 0 2 42 3.95454545454545 44

Quality of Handouts 0 0 2 42 3.95454545454545 44

Interaction Encouraged 0 0 2 42 3.95454545454545 44

The Trainer is Knowledgeable 0 0 2 42 3.95454545454545 44

Trainer Was Well Prepared 0 0 2 42 3.95454545454545 44

I Learnt Something Useful 0 0 1 43 3.97727272727273 44

Total Average 3.951

Speaker Evaluation : Dr. Jain Mathew

The Analysis is on the Basis of a Rating Scale, with 1 Being The Lowest and 4 Being The Highest

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 44

CRITERIAS FOR EVALUATION NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 1 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 2 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 3 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 4 AVERAGE SUM

Training Objectives Clearly Defined 0 1 7 36 3.79545454545455 44

Training Content 0 1 7 36 3.79545454545455 44

Quality of Handouts 0 1 7 36 3.79545454545455 44

Interaction Encouraged 0 1 6 37 3.81818181818182 44

The Trainer is Knowledgeable 0 1 6 37 3.81818181818182 44

Trainer Was Well Prepared 0 1 6 37 3.81818181818182 44

I Learnt Something Useful 0 1 6 37 3.81818181818182 44

Total Average 3.808

Speaker Evaluation : Prof. Rajani Ramdas

The Analysis is on the Basis of a Rating Scale, with 1 Being The Lowest and 4 Being The Highest

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 44

CRITERIAS FOR EVALUATION NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 1 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 2 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 3 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 4 AVERAGE SUM

Training Objectives Clearly Defined 0 0 5 39 3.88636363636364 44

Training Content 0 0 3 41 3.93181818181818 44

Quality of Handouts 0 0 5 39 3.88636363636364 44

Interaction Encouraged 0 0 2 42 3.95454545454545 44

The Trainer is Knowledgeable 0 0 3 41 3.93181818181818 44

Trainer Was Well Prepared 0 0 4 40 3.90909090909091 44

I Learnt Something Useful 0 0 2 42 3.95454545454545 44

Total Average 3.922

Speaker Evaluation : Dr. Jyothi Kumar

The Analysis is on the Basis of a Rating Scale, with 1 Being The Lowest and 4 Being The Highest

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 44

CRITERIAS FOR EVALUATION NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 1 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 2 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 3 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 4 AVERAGE SUM

Training Objectives Clearly Defined 0 0 7 37 3.84090909090909 44

Training Content 0 0 6 38 3.86363636363636 44

Quality of Handouts 0 0 8 36 3.81818181818182 44

Interaction Encouraged 0 1 5 38 3.84090909090909 44

The Trainer is Knowledgeable 0 0 5 39 3.88636363636364 44

Trainer Was Well Prepared 0 0 7 37 3.84090909090909 44

I Learnt Something Useful 0 0 6 38 3.86363636363636 44

Total Average 3.851

Speaker Evaluation : Dr. Suresha B

The Analysis is on the Basis of a Rating Scale, with 1 Being The Lowest and 4 Being The Highest

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 44

CRITERIAS FOR EVALUATION NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 1 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 2 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 3 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 4 AVERAGE SUM

Training Objectives Clearly Defined 0 1 4 39 3.86363636363636 44

Training Content 0 1 3 40 3.88636363636364 44

Quality of Handouts 0 1 4 39 3.86363636363636 44

Interaction Encouraged 0 1 4 39 3.86363636363636 44

The Trainer is Knowledgeable 0 1 3 40 3.88636363636364 44

Trainer Was Well Prepared 0 1 4 39 3.86363636363636 44

I Learnt Something Useful 0 1 4 39 3.86363636363636 44

Total Average 3.87

Speaker Evaluation : Prof. Balu L

The Analysis is on the Basis of a Rating Scale, with 1 Being The Lowest and 4 Being The Highest

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 44

CRITERIAS FOR EVALUATION NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 1 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 2 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 3 NO. OF PEOPLE WHO GRADED : 4 AVERAGE SUM

Training Objectives Clearly Defined 1 0 10 33 3.70454545454545 44

Training Content 1 0 9 34 3.72727272727273 44

Quality of Handouts 1 0 8 35 3.75 44

Interaction Encouraged 1 0 7 36 3.77272727272727 44

The Trainer is Knowledgeable 1 1 8 34 3.70454545454545 44

Trainer Was Well Prepared 1 0 9 34 3.72727272727273 44

I Learnt Something Useful 1 0 7 36 3.77272727272727 44

Total Average 3.737

Speaker Evaluation : Dr. Ganesh L

The Analysis is on the Basis of a Rating Scale, with 1 Being The Lowest and 4 Being The Highest

CRITERIA AVERAGE

Overall Evaluation 3.825

Professor Suresh Pai 3.795

Prof. Nishal Pinto 3.86

Dr. Jain Mathew 3.951

Prof. Rajani Ramdas 3.808

Dr. Jyothi Kumar 3.922

Dr. Suresha B 3.851

Prof. L. Balu 3.87

Dr. Ganesh L 3.737

Overall Summary

The Analysis is on the Basis of a Rating Scale, with 1 Being The Lowest and 4 Being The Highest