What you had to say….

Participant feedback based on an

anonymous online questionnaire

What we set out to do…..

The aim of the conference was to share knowledge and experiences, and discuss monitoring and evaluation strategies for sustainability-related behaviour change programs in a way that was stimulating, challenging and created opportunities for learning and making connections.

We wanted to move away

from the traditional

conference format…..

….and focus on you, the

participants, by using an

Open Space format.

This is a break from the status

quo…..

That’s not us!! We definitely shifted…

As with any change, we were bound to have both

success, as well as lessons……

After all, evaluation is about learning,

and learning is what we did….

What you thought about this…..

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Website Venue Open Space Catering Sustainability Principles

Level of respondent satisfaction to aspects of the conference

1 (Very Satisfied)

2

3

4

5

6

7 (Not at all satisfied)

A generally high level of satisfaction with the conference website,

venue, catering and demonstration of sustainability principles, but a

much more even spread with regards to the Open Space format.

“I've been to other conferences where open space

hasn't worked very well, but I thought it was great

at SMTC. I think it helps to have a clear point or

points of focus for the conference.”

“I can see that this has potential, but it did not

work out in my case as I continuously met the

wrong people (yes, there can be the wrong

people!)

“Great for networking.”

“Very complementary to the soft systems approach my project team is experimenting with.”

“The topic was relevant to my work, ….not sure that the final content/outcomes were useful.”

“Was relevant but the first 2 days did not equip me to be a better evaluator.”

“Personal opinions and rants, voting with your feet meant opinions were not challenged -

process lacks peer review.”

“Inspirational, brave and innovative!”

“Provoked too much thinking”

“The open space format was not at all

thought provoking”

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

1 (Was value for money)

2 3 4 5 6 7 (Was NOT value for money)

Overall respondent reflection on the two days of Open Space

“Was value for money - although not sure on value for time”

SMTC was a conference where you

set the agenda…..

“Was well done - but I would have benefited from some presentations for successes and why and from funding bodies on

success factors to addressing evaluation guidelines.”

“It needed to be mixed in with presentations or case studies of where the evaluation methods had worked. All it did was

confirm that everyone had the same issues and didn't lead to any resolution.”

“Was too open in the end... I can see the value in the format and the concept excites me, BUT I think that with too many

people coming from too many different contexts, the open space became too open and nebulous.”

“Even when I couldn't find what I needed, I could chat about that and then record that!!! Very democratic!”

“It would have been useful for an experienced facilitator to be on hand in some of the discussion groups to support

the group.”

“The quality was patchy and there was not enough knowledge in some groups to make it valuable - more questions than answers at

times. Difficult to catch up with another group mid discussion, and often hard to hear anyway.”

“Yes it allowed discussion on topics but often with no useful content or suggestions.”

“I found myself talking about things I usually talk about and renewing existing knowledge.”

“They were fun, generated a good group

feeling, however, did not add significantly to

my understanding of evaluating behaviour

change.”

“Absolutely outstanding - and worth coming to

the conference for this alone!”

“Did not close the conference to my mind.”

Facilitated discussions

Some keynote speakers

Opportunities to learn new techniques for evaluating

behaviour change programs

A structured approach to share the proceedings from

the break-out groups during the conference

More workshops

You said you wanted MORE of

this…..

Open Space

Unstructured and un-facilitated conversations

And LESS of this…..

So next time, we’d go for a

hybrid format

YOUR HIGHLIGHTS…..

Conference dinner and

NICA performance

Sharing in conversations with

similarly interested people

Post-conference workshops

As for the post-

conference workshops

“The workshop made my 3 days out of

the office worthwhile.”

“The best part of the conference for

me.”

“Excellent workshop and good to spend

a day focussed on a specific topic after

so much open space.”

AND LASTLY, SOME FINAL WORDS ON “WHAT DIFFERENCE HAS

THE CONFERENCE MADE FOR YOU” ………

PERSONALLY:

“Met some great people. Motivation increased.”

“Highlighted yet again the need to 'listen' more.”

PROFESSIONALLY:

“Better understanding of the complexities of evaluating behaviour change and taking it into

consideration when doing projects.”

“New contacts, learning from others.”

“Bit disappointed with Open Space in this context, not sure it worked...”

Thank you for taking the

time to complete the survey

and providing us with your

feedback.

Cartoons: Simon Kneebone

www.showmethechange.net.au

Photos: (Yes, you guessed it… Microsoft Clipart Online!)