46
CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN BIM-BASED PRODUCTION SYSTEM IN CONSTRUCTION Paper ID: 106 Christoph Paul Schimanski 12 , Gabriele Pasetti Monizza 2 , Carmen Marcher 12 and Dominik T. Matt 12 [email protected] 1 Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy 2 Fraunhofer Italia Research

CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN BIM-BASED PRODUCTION SYSTEM IN CONSTRUCTION

Paper ID: 106

Christoph Paul Schimanski12, Gabriele Pasetti Monizza2, Carmen Marcher12 and Dominik T. Matt12

[email protected]

1Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy2 Fraunhofer Italia Research

Page 2: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

FundingThis work is part of BIM Simulation Lab - FESR 1086, a research project funded by the European Development Fund (ERDF) Südtirol/Alto Adige.

2

Page 3: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Production Systems in Construction

What is a production system in construction?

“A framework of methods and tools to manage construction processes according to the three target variables quality, time and costs.”(Borrmann et al, 2018)

3

QUALITY

COST TIME

Page 4: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Motivation

Source: Financial times

4

Page 5: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Lean Construction

5

Page 6: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Lean Construction

6

Page 7: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Lean Construction

Source: lean.org/leanpostBIM can help to define what is needed

Everything that is not needed is waste7

Page 8: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Building Information Modeling (BIM)

8

Page 9: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Goal: Shifting production system design efforts towards the digital prototype

▪ Integration of BiM and Lean on data processing level

▪ Conceptualizing a new lean BIM-based production system:

▪ Storing Last Planner System (LPS) process information in the IFC file format

9

Page 10: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Goal: Shifting production system design efforts towards the digital prototype

▪ Integration of BiM and Lean on data processing level

▪ Conceptualizing a new lean BIM-based production system:

▪ Storing Last Planner System (LPS) process information in the IFC file format

- Production System 10

Page 11: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Research question & hypothesis

How to use BIM to standardize lean production

systems in construction execution?

Poor productvity

Making LPS routines BIM-based through linkage on

data processing level

One-of-a-kind character

Binninger et al. (2018); Kenley

(2005); Koskela (2000)

Lean Construction is a good idea to stabilize

workflows

Tommelein

(2017); Ballard

et al. (2007)

BIM is getting more and more important

Rossini et al.

(2017); Won

and Lee (2016)BIM & Lean have positive synergies

Dave et al. (2013); Khan

and Tzortzopoulos (2014);

Sacks et al. (2010b; a)

Difficult to standardize production systems

Borrmann et al. (2018);

Ratajczak et al. (2018)

11

Page 12: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Pilot construction sites

Evaluation

Secondary analysis

Systematic literature review

Developing solution

- Theoretical integration model- Methodology for application in practice- Requirement analysis for implementation- Software prototyping

Lack of standardizedproduction systems

BIM-LPS integration on data processing level

Suggesting solution

Problem statement

51 4

2

3

Design Science Research

Research Methodology

12

Page 13: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Preliminary literature findings - Shortcomings

▪ Adding aspects of Scrum

▪ Adding aspects of (digital) Kanban

▪ Adding aspects of Earned Value Management13

Clear roles(Dave et al. 2015)

Visualisation, Pull-System, Digitize!(Mossman 2015; Rybkowski 2010)

Cost control(Novinsky et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2018) 13

Frameworks of co-applications (Guerriero et al. (2017); Scheer et al. (2014))

Partial implementation of LPS steps (Bhatla and Leite (2012); Gerber et al. (2010))

❷Need to add other functionalities:

Page 14: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

The BeaM! process from LPS perspective

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

14

Page 15: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

ProjectStart Date

Project End Date

Phase 1 Milestone

Phase 2 Milestone

Phase 3 Milestone

Project End Milestone

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Bea

M!

15

Page 16: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

ProjectStart Date

Project End Date

3 months look-ahead-window

Today In 3 months

Phase 1 Milestone

Phase 2 Milestone

Phase 3 Milestone

Project End Milestone

Phase 1

Bea

M!

16

Page 17: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Digital Process Kanban (DPK)

Bea

M!

Concrete Slab

Shell workers

1st Floor

200 m³

4 weeks

25.000

17

Page 18: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

PhaseStart Date

Milestone Date

Phase duration according to Master schedule

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Bea

M!

DPK – Network View18

Page 19: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Process-ID: 01

Process-ID: 02

Process-ID: 03

Process-ID: 04

Process-ID: 05

Process-ID: 06

Process-ID: 07

Process-ID: 08

Bea

M!

PhaseStart Date

Milestone Date

DPK – Gantt View19

Page 20: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

6 week look-ahead-window

TodayIn 6 weeks

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Bea

M!

Process-ID: 01

Process-ID: 02

Process-ID: 03

Process-ID: 04

Process-ID: 05

Process-ID: 06

Process-ID: 07

Process-ID: 08

PhaseStart Date

Milestone Date

DPK – Gantt View20

Page 21: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Designing Operations

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Bea

M!

Concrete Slab

Shell workers

1st Floor

200 m³

4 weeks

25.000

21

Page 22: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Concrete Slab25.000 20

Bea

M!

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Creating Digital Operation Kanban (DOK)

2 30 m² 10 5

22

Page 23: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Bea

M!

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Digital Operation Kanban (DOK)

23

Page 24: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Bea

M!

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Construction Formwork

5 days

Service Installation

5 days

Re-inforcement placement

5 days

Concrete pouring

2 days

Formwork removal &

repair

2 days

Re-inforcement preparation

5 days

DO FBDO FB DO FB DO FB DO FB

DO FB

Process Finish

Process Start

DOK – Network View

Warning when Critical Path duration of DOK exceeds

DPK duration

Duration (Critical Path, DOK) = 19 d

DO = Depends On

FB = Followed By

Process duration according to phase planning

24

Page 25: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Bea

M!

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Process-ID: 01

Process-ID: 02

Process-ID: 03

Process-ID: 04

Process-ID: 05

Process-ID: 06

Process-ID: 07

Process-ID: 08

PhaseStart Date

Milestone Date

DPK + DOK – Gantt View

3 week look-ahead-window

Today In 3 weeks

25

Page 26: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Bea

M!

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Process-ID: 01

Process-ID: 02

Process-ID: 03

Process-ID: 04

Process-ID: 05

Process-ID: 06

Process-ID: 07

Process-ID: 08

PhaseStart Date

Milestone Date

DPK + DOK – Gantt View

1 week look-ahead-window

Today In 1 week

26

Page 27: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Construction Formwork

Service Installation

Reinforcement preparation

Reinforcement placement

Concr. Pour.

Formw. Rem.

W1 W2 W3 W4

SERVICE INSTALLATION

OPERATION-ID: 01.02

Committed as planned?

CONSTRAINTS

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Process Finish

Process Start

DOK – Gantt View

Page 28: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Construction Formwork

Service Installation

Reinforcement preparation

Reinforcement placement

Concr. Pour.

Formw. Rem.

SERVICE INSTALLATION

Committed as planned?

CONSTRAINTS

W1 W2 W3 W4

Process Finish

Process Start

DOK – Gantt View

OPERATION-ID: 01.02

Page 29: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

Construction Formwork

Service Installation

Reinforcement preparation

Reinforcement placement

Concr. Pour.

Formw. Rem.

W1 W2 W3 W4

Process Finish

Process Start

DOK – Gantt View

Page 30: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

MO TU WE TH FR

SERVICE INSTALLATION

REINFORCEMENT PREP.

Weekly Work Plan (WWP)

W2

2

5 m²

8

Page 31: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Construction Formwork

Service Installation

Reinforcement preparation

Reinforcement placement

Concr. Pour.

Formw. Rem.

W1 W2 W3 W4

Process Finish

Process Start

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

WWP Monitoring

Reason for Non-Completion

SERVICE INSTALLATION

OPERATION-ID: 01.02

Done as committed?

Page 32: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Construction Formwork

Service Installation

Reinforcement preparation

Reinforcement placement

Concr. Pour.

Formw. Rem.

W1 W2 W3 W4

Process Finish

Process Start

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

WWP Monitoring

Page 33: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

KPIs

▪ LPS metrics (PPC, TMR, TA)

▪ EVM metrics (EV, AC, PV)

33Source: PMIS Consulting Limited

Page 34: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W11 W12 W13

Backlog Made-Ready Committed On-going Done-as-committed

KPIs

▪ LPS metrics (PPC, TMR, TA)

▪ EVM metrics (EV, AC, PV)

▪ Kanban metrics (CT, LT)

Page 35: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Master Schedule Phase Planning Lookahead Planning Commitment Planning Monitoring & Learning

KPIs

▪ LPS metrics (PPC, TMR, TA)

▪ EVM metrics (EV, AC, PV)

▪ Kanban metrics (CT, LT)

W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W11 W12 W13

CUMULATED CONSUMED MATERIALS

Concrete Steel Plaster

Page 36: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

36

Bea

M!

36

Page 37: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Preliminary Results

▪ Database schema

37

Page 38: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Preliminary Results

▪ Database schema

▪ Integration model

Step Phase scheduling steps 1-6 by Ballard (2000b) Digital Kanban-Board functionality BIM: IFC manipulation

0Have master schedule as starting point and

identify milestones

Select BIM-Objects in IFC Viewer and press

"create Milestone" button

Instantiate IfcTask object and set boolean

IsMilestone to true

1"Define the work to be included in the phase;

e.g., foundations, building skin, etc."

Select BIM objects in IFC Viewer and press

"create Digital Process Kanban Button" OR

create corresponding Digital Process Kanban on

mobile device and send it to Bea M!-Board and

then link to BIM objects

Kanban trigger instantiation of IfcTask objects

which are linked to selected BIM objects

(IfcElements ) through IfcRelAssignsToProduct

objects

2

"Determine the completion date for the phase,

plus any major interim releases from prior

phases or to subsequent phases."

Click on respective milestone and set

finish date

Set attribute LateFinish of Type IfcDateTime in

entity IfcTaskTime and relate to milestone

IfcTask objects in step 0

3

"Using team scheduling and stickies on a wall,

develop the network of activities required to

complete the phase, working backwards from

the completion date, and incorporating any

interim milestones."

Arrangement of Kanban via touch control on

Bea M!-Board defines dependencies

Manipulate the IsSuccessorFrom and

IsPredecessorOf attributes of IfcTask objects

defined in step 1

4"Apply durations to each activity, with no

contingency or float in the duration estimates"Click on respective Kanban and set duration

Assign duration through type IfcDuration and

relate to IfcTask objects defined in step 1

5"Reexamine logic to try to shorten the

duration."

Collaborative re-arrangement of Kanban via

touch control on Bea M!-Board

Update of dependencies in IfcTask objects

defined in step 1 according to re-arrangement

6"Determine the earliest practical start date for

the phase"

Click on first Digital Process Kanban of the

phase and set start date

Set attribute EarlyStart of Type IfcDateTime in

entity IfcTaskTime and relate to first arranged

IfcTask object in step 538

Page 39: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Preliminary Results

▪ Database schema

▪ Integration model

▪ IT architecture

Cloud based IFC database

Ready to usePlug-ins

• IFC Viewer• Model-checker• Versioning• Render engine• etc.

BeaM!

IFC file

Web-based client application

39

Page 40: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

Next Steps

40

Concluding requirement analysis for implementation

Definition of use case scenarios

Evaluation according DSR

Prototypical software implementation

Piloting Answering research question

Page 41: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

41

Page 42: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

References

42

Ballard, G., Howell, G. A., Tommelein, I. D., and Zabelle, T. (2007). “The Last Planner Production System Workbook.”

Lean Construction Institute, San Francisco, California, USA, 81pp, (January), 82.

Bhatla, A., and Leite, F. (2012). “Integration Framework of BIM with the Last Planner System.” Proc. 20th Ann. Conf. of

the Int’l. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, San Diego, 10.

Binninger, M., Dlouhy, J., Schattmann, M., and Haghsheno, S. (2018). “Short Takt Time in Construction – a Practical

Study.” 1133–1143.

Borrmann, A., König, M., Koch, C., and Beetz, J. (2018). Building Information Modeling Technology Foundations and

Industry Practice. Springer.

Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2011). “Visilean: designing a production management system with lean and BIM.”

19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524.

Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). “Challenges and opportunities in implementing lean and BIM on an

infrastructure project.” 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2013, IGLC 2013,

60–69.

Page 43: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

References

43

Dave, B., Hämäläinen, J.-P., and Koskela, L. (2015). “Exploring the Recurrent Problems in the Last Planner

Implementation on Construction Projects.” Proceedings of the Indian Lean Construction Conference (ILCC 2015),

1–9.

Garrido, M. C., Mendes, R., Scheer, S., and Campestrini, T. F. (2015). “Using BIM for last planner system: Case studies

in Brazil.” Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, Proceedings, 604–611.

Gerber, D. J., Becerik-Gerber, B., and Kunz, A. (2010). “Building Information Modeling and Lean Construction:

Technology, Methodology and Advances From Practice.” 18th Ann. Conf. of the Int’l. Group for Lean Construction,

1–11.

Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., Berroir, F., and Lemaire, C. (2017). “BIM-enhanced collaborative smart technologies for

LEAN construction processes.” ICE/ITMC 2017 - Proceedings, 1023–1030.

Hamzeh, F., and Bergstrom, E. (2010). “The Lean Transformation : A Framework for Successful Implementation of the

Last Planner TM System in Construction.” International Proceedings of the 46th Annual Conference Associated

Schools of Construction, Associated Schools of Construction, Boston, 8.

Page 44: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

References

44

Kenley, R. (2005). “Dispelling the complexity MYTH: Founding lean construction on location-based planning.” 13th

International Group for Lean Construction Conference: Proceedings, 4321(7374), 245–251.

Khan, S., and Tzortzopoulos, P. (2014). “Effects of the interactions between lps and bim on workflow in two building

design projects.” 22nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, IGLC 2014, 933–944.

Koskela, L. (2000). “An Exploration towards a Production Theory and its Application to Construction.” Helsinki

University of Technology.

Lagos, C., Herrera, R., and Alarcón, L. F. (2017). “Contributions of Information Technologies to Last Planner System

implementation.” Proc. Lean & Computing in Construction Congress (LC3), Vol. 1 (CIB W78), Heraklion, Greece,

II(July), 87–94.

Mendes Junior, R., Scheer, S., Garrido, M. C., and Campestrini, T. F. (2014). “Utilização da modelagem da informação

da construção (BIM) no planejamento e controle da produção: um estudo de caso.” XV Encontro Nacional de

Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído, 2913–2922.

Mossman, A. (2015). “Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial & collaborative conversations for predictable design &

construction delivery.” The Change Business Ltd, 1–16.

Page 45: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

References

45

Novinsky, M., Nesensohn, C., Ihwas, N., and Haghsheno, S. (2018). “Combined Application of Earned Value

Management and Last Planner System in Construction Projects.” 26th Annual Conference of the International

Group for Lean Construction, 775–785.

Ratajczak, J., Schimanski, C. P., Marcher, C., Riedl, M., and Matt, D. T. (2018). “Collaborative tool for the construction

site to enhance lean project delivery.” Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering: 15th International

Conference, CDVE 2018, Hangzhou, China, October 21–24, 2018, Proceedings, 192–199.

Rossini, F. L., Novembri, G., and Fioravanti, A. (2017). “BIM AND AGENT-BASED MODEL INTEGRATION FOR

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION.” Proc. 25th Ann. Conf. of the Int’l. Group for Lean Construction,

II(July), 111–118.

Rybkowski, Z. K. (2010). “Last planner and its role as conceptual kanban.” Iglc 2010, 63–72.

Sacks, R., Koskela, L., Dave, B. A., and Owen, R. (2010a). “Interaction of Lean and Building Information Modeling in

Construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9), 968–980.

Page 46: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW LEAN …...19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 514–524. Dave, B., Boddy, S., and Koskela, L. (2013). hallenges

References

46

Sacks, R., Radosavljevic, M., and Barak, R. (2010b). “Requirements for building information modeling based lean

production management systems for construction.” Automation in Construction, Elsevier B.V., 19(5), 641–655.

Sacks, R., Radosavljevic, M., and M. Barak, R. (2010c). “A Building Information Modelling Based Production Control

System for Construction.” W078-Special Track 18th CIB World Building Congress May 2010 Salford, United

Kingdom, 1.

Toledo, M., Olivares, K., and Gónzalez, V. (2016). “Exploration of a Lean - Bim Planning Framework: A Last Planner

System and Bim - Based Case Study.” Proc. 24th Ann. Conf. of the Int’l. Group for Lean Construction, International

Group for Lean Construction, Boston, 3–12.

Tommelein, I. D. (2017). “Collaborative takt time planning of non-repetetive work.” Proc. 25th Ann. Conf. of the Int’l.

Group for Lean Construction, (July), 745–752.

Won, J., and Lee, G. (2016). “How to tell if a BIM project is successful: A goal-driven approach.” Automation in

Construction, Elsevier B.V., 69, 34–43.