24
Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Common Core State Standards

An overview for

Professional Development Leads

March 8, 2010Mary Russell, Region 3

Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Page 2: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

www.corestandards.org

How were the Common Core Standards developed?

Page 3: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Myth or Fact

Page 4: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Common Core Development

• Initially 48 states and three territories signed on

• As of October 14, 2010, 39 states have officially adopted

• Final Standards released June 2, 2010, at www.corestandards.org

• Adoption required for Race to the Top funds

Page 5: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8
Page 6: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Common Core Development

• Each state adopting the common core either directly or by fully aligning its state standards may do so in accordance with current state timelines for standards adoption not to exceed three (3) years.

• States that choose to align their standards to the common core standards accept 100% of the core. States may add additional standards.

Page 7: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8
Page 8: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Common Core and Essential Standards Comparison

Common Core Essential Standards

Research and Evidenced Based Research and Evidenced Based

Rigorous Rigorous

College and Workplace Aligned College and Workplace Aligned

Internationally Benchmark Some International Benchmark

Learning Progressions Not Developed on Progressions

Not Based on any 1 Taxonomy RBT

Balance of concepts and skills Conceptual Format

Domain, Clusters, Strands, Math Practices, Literacy Standards

Organization—Some Organized by Strands

Page 9: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

• Grade or course introductions give 2- 4 focal points• K-8 presented by grade level• K-6 Purpose• Organized into domains that progress over several

grades• High school standards presented by conceptual

theme (Number & Quantity, Algebra, Functions, Modeling, Geometry, Statistics & Probability)

Standards for Mathematical Content

Page 10: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning

of others4. Model with mathematics5. Use appropriate tools strategically6. Attend to precision7. Look for and make use of structure8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning

Standards for Mathematical Practices

Page 11: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Standards Meet RttT

• Think-Pair-Share:

– Group 1: Discuss connections evident between the Common Core Standards and the NCEES presented on Day 1 of Boot Camp?

– Group 2: Discuss the relationship between RttT and Common Core Standards

Page 12: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Vocabulary

Page 13: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Benefits for States and Districts

• Read the Common Core FAQ• 3-2-1:

– Three ideas that will be helpful to know in our work as PD Leads

– Highlight 2 important phrases to remember– One question you want to explore further

Page 14: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Benefits

• Allows collaborative professional development based on best practices

• Allows development of common assessments and other tools

• Enables comparison of policies and achievement across states and districts

• Creates potential for collaborative groups to get more economical mileage for:– Curriculum development, assessment, and

professional development

Page 15: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Implications for Instruction and Assessments

Page 16: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Rigor/Relevance FrameworkInternational Center for Leadership in Education. (n.d.) Rigor/Relevance Framework. Retrieved January 24, 2010, from http://www.leadered.com/rrr.html

Knowledge Taxonomy

Evaluation 6

Synthesis 5

Analysis 4

Application 3

Comprehension 2

Knowledge/Awareness

1

1 2 3 4 5

Knowledge in one

discipline

Apply in disciplin

e

Apply across

disciplines

Apply to real-world

predictable solutions

Apply to real-world

unpredictable situations

Application Model

C D

A BQuadrant A – Acquisition

Students gather and store bits of knowledge and information.

Students are primarily expected to remember or understand this

knowledge.

Quadrant B – ApplicationStudents use acquired

knowledge to solve problems, design solutions,

and complete work. The highest level of application is to apply knowledge to new and unpredictable

situations.

Quadrant C – AssimilationStudents extend and refine their acquired knowledge to be able to use that knowledge automatically and routinely to analyze and solve

problems and create solutions.

Quadrant D – AdaptationStudents have the competence to think in complex ways and to apply their knowledge and skills. Even when confronted with perplexing

unknowns, students are able to use extensive knowledge and skill to create solutions and take action

that further develops their skills and knowledge.

Page 17: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

The Council of Chief State School Officers

The National Governors

Association Center for Best Practices

The Council of Chief State School Officers

The National Governors

Association Center for Best Practices

Language Arts & MathematicsLanguage Arts & Mathematics

Science, Social Studies, Arts Education, etc Science, Social Studies, Arts Education, etc

Common Core Standards

Language Arts & Mathematics

Common Core Standards

Language Arts & Mathematics

Common Core Standards

English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social

Studies,

Science, & Technical Subjects

Common Core Standards

English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social

Studies,

Science, & Technical Subjects

The North Carolina

Department of Public

Instruction

The North Carolina

Department of Public

Instruction

Crosswalks to existing

Standards

Crosswalks to existing

Standards

Essential StandardsEssential Standards

The Local

Education Agency

The Local

Education Agency

District

Local CurriculumDistrict

Local Curriculum

The Classroom

Teacher

The Classroom

Teacher Classroom InstructionClassroom Instruction

Page 18: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Consortiums

• SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC)

Page 19: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

Challenges and Concerns

• RBT• Support Documents

• History of Development of ELA and Mathematics

Standards

Page 20: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8

?

Page 21: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8
Page 22: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8
Page 23: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8
Page 24: Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8