7
CO 2 monitoring and modelling across Greater London Lester Kwiatkowski

CO 2 monitoring and modelling across Greater London

  • Upload
    morey

  • View
    36

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CO 2 monitoring and modelling across Greater London. Lester Kwiatkowski. Site characteristics. Urban roadside. Urban background. Rural background. Mean = 279.7 µgm -3. Explanatory factors Diurnal mixing depth cycles Anthropogenic emissions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CO 2  monitoring and modelling across Greater London

CO2 monitoring and modelling across Greater London

Lester Kwiatkowski

Page 2: CO 2  monitoring and modelling across Greater London

Site characteristics

Urban roadside Urban background

Rural background

Page 3: CO 2  monitoring and modelling across Greater London

Mean = 279.7µgm-3

Mean = 40.1µgm-3

Mean = 34.2µgm-3

Mean = 425.2ppm

Mean = 419ppm

Mean = 396.2ppm

Explanatory factors

•Diurnal mixing depth cycles

• Anthropogenic emissions

• Heat island effects influencing diurnal mixing depth

• Biogenic signals?

• Any suggestions?

BRUTAL model predictions…

Page 4: CO 2  monitoring and modelling across Greater London

Deciphering wind speed/direction relationships

SP

Page 5: CO 2  monitoring and modelling across Greater London

Street canyon effects

NOx enrichment due to easterly winds carrying an enriched “London signal”

CO2 signals difficult to interpret, higher CO2 for directions with lower average wind speeds but other effects going on (European CO2 signal)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000

0.51

1.52

2.53

3.54

4.55

wind direction (degrees)

Win

d Sp

eed

m/s

Page 6: CO 2  monitoring and modelling across Greater London

Modelling approaches

• Road transport CO2 emissions run through BRUTAL can explain much of the difference between NK and MR but fails to account for the difference between SP and NK/MR

• Stratified modeling work in progress… (ApSimon & Oxley)

Page 7: CO 2  monitoring and modelling across Greater London

Thanks