15
8 December 2011 DDL 22, Edinburgh, Scotland Choosing the Right Device The case for Nebulisers Philippe Rogueda

Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Nebulisers are the oldest inhalation delivery devices, yet have been confined to the treatment of cystic fibrosis and clinical settings. Choosing a nebuliser can be bewildering, because of the choices and combinations available, and because nebules+nebuliser combinations are not prescriptive. This is further compounded by the different methods and experimental set-ups used to test nebulisers, that could benefit from harmonisation.The term nebulisers covers a range of technology: from jet to mesh nebulisers, from home to hospital setting, from daily use to critical care, paediatrics to geriatrics. No wonder the technology choices can seem too rich to contemplate. This wealth of technology shows that nebulisation delivery is very much alive and can answer many needs of the respiratory delivery community. New devices and technologies are developed regularly, the Respimat, MicroDose dry powder nebuliser and Supraer are three examples of such advances which will we review.In this paper, we will take a stand in favour of nebulisers, and show you how to structure your approach to select the most appropriate device for your needs. This will be done in 4 steps:-Criteria list drafting-Technology and performance review-Hints and tips to screen through performance data and marketing smoke-screens-Review of alternative technologies

Citation preview

Page 1: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

www.pharm.monash.edu.au/mips

8 December 2011 DDL 22, Edinburgh, Scotland

Choosing the Right Device The case for Nebulisers Philippe Rogueda

Page 2: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

The Case for Nebulisers

•  Mature Technology – Oldest form of inhalation therapy? – Device is separate from medication

•  Well established with user community – Mostly CF and clinical settings

•  Varied, cheap and convenient? - Many combinations, new technologies, not easily replaced by alternatives

Page 3: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Example: the De Vilbiss Range

Traveller Portable PulmoNeb LT PulmoNeb PulmoAide Compact

PulmoAide PulmoMate Heavy Duty Compressor

Page 4: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Choosing a Nebuliser

Technology and Performance

Reading Through the Lines

Alternative Technologies

Criteria List

Page 5: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Setting your Criteria

•  Properties of the API, dosage, regimen •  Target use and patient group •  Required functionality •  Intended operating conditions •  Handling and ergonomics

What?

•  Appearance and visual language •  Basic safety •  Accessories and connections to other devices •  Target costs, production costs and forecast •  Target countries

Where?

Clinical and C

omm

ercial Needs

•  Mode of supply •  Lifetime, disposal, cleaning and servicing •  Quality and regulatory •  Intellectual property •  Suppliers and external contracts

How?

20 nebulisers – 24 compressors – 13 combinations – EU & USA From Clinic to Market

Page 6: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Jet Nebulisers

| Presentation Title | Presenter Name | Date | Subject | Business Use Only

6

Manufacturer Nebuliser Compressor

PARI EU: JunioBOY, BOY SX, LC Sprint Junior, LC Sprint Baby, LC Sprint Star, LL – USA: LC Plus, LC Sprint, LC star, LC disposable

EU: JunioBOY S, TurboBOY S, BOY SX, Mobile S - USA: Vios adult Vios Paediatric Trek S Portable

De Vilbiss VixOne Disposable VixOne Reusable

PulmoNeb LT Traveler Portable PulmoNeb Polumo-aide Compact PulmoMate Pulmo-Aire Heavy Duty Compressor

Invacare Stratos Pro (USA and EU models) Stratos Compact (USA) Stratos Portable (USA)

Envoy Jr XP Compressor (USA) Envoy Compressor (USA)

MOBILAIR Compressor (USA) §  Other suppliers include Covidien (raindrop),

Omron Comp range, Evo and Salter Labs

Manufacturer Nebuliser Compressor

DTF/Aerodrug Atomisor range: NSL2 NL9, NL9F, NL9M

Box Box+ Synchrone Vanity AL

Truddel Medical Aeroeclipse III

Philips Sidestream Sidestream Plus Ventstream MicroPlus

InspirationElite MicroElite MiniElite OptionHome

Clement Clarke Medix Actineb Medix AC2000

Medix World traveller Medix Econoneb Medix Turboneb 2

Medix Micro Neb III

Intersurgical MicroCirrus Cirrus Cirrus 2 Hot Top Plus

Page 7: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Jet Nebulisers LC / Boy – PARI

Junior BOY S

LC Sprint Junior

Turbo BOY S

LC Sprint

+ + BOY SX

+

LC Sprint or BOY SX

Mobile S Trek S Portable (USA)

+

LC Sprint

Vios Pediatric (USA) Vios Adult (USA)

Page 8: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Mesh Nebulisers

Manufacturer Model PARI eFlow Rapid Philips (Respironics) iNeb Covidien (Nellcor) Easyneb Clement Clarke Medix Microneb

(same as MicroAir U22 technology from Omron) Omron MicroAir U22

UltraAir Aerogen Aeroneb Go range

§  Omron technology: forms the core of the MicroAir and UltraAir devices, as well as the Medix Microneb of Clement Clark.

§  Easyneb (Covidien, Nellcor, Puritan Bennett) is an ultrasonic nebuliser for ventilators.

Page 9: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Mesh Nebulisers

Performance of the vibrating membrane aerosol generation device: aeroneb micropump nebulizer. G Zhang, A David, T S Wiedmann. J. Aerosol Med. 20(4), 408-416 (2007)

Mesh: 1000’s tapered holes, 4-80 µm. F~128 kHz. Holes act as micro-pumps.

Page 10: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Performance Variations

VMD (um)

Dv50 (um)

Res Vol (ml)

Output

Treatment time Delivery rate

Mesh

4.8 ± 0.2 (5%)

0.3 ± 0.1 (32%)

0.40 ± 0.07 (18%) mg/min

Jet 4.1 ± 0.6 (14%)

1.19 ± 0.13 (11%)

1.19 ± 0.2 (17%) mg

5.64 ± 1.09 (19%) min

0.22 ± 0.05 (23%) mg/min

Mesh 5.24 ± 0.75 (14%)

0.34 ± 0.03 (8%) ml

49 ± 10 (21%) sec

0.43 ± 0.09 (21%) ml/min

•  Performance variation is greater than for DPIs or pMDIs •  Variations include: droplet size, residual volumes, delivered dose,

delivery rate, battery life, aging of mesh, blocking of mesh

Page 11: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Reading Through the Lines: Data Review

-Make sure the data has not been generated at an “optimal” flow rate -Check that the residual volumes include all volumes left behind (residual vs. rain drop)

-A warm compressor performs better than a cold one, but a patient will always start with a cold compressor

-Check how the chambers are cleaned. Residual detergent between runs can improve performance. Can the cleaning be performed according to the CF society recommendations?

-Check that performance has been tested with known breathing patterns, preferably with cooling of the impactor and %RH control.

-Check the performance of the motors and battery life on portable instruments -Know the difference between nasal and mouth breathing, cf paediatric applications

-Is your chosen nebuliser available on all markets?

Page 12: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Alternatives to Current Technologies

•  BI •  Aqueous solution mechanically propelled

New technologies update the concept of nebulisation, open new markets, improve performance.

Respimat

Dry Powder

Supraer

•  Microdose Therapeutics •  Based on piezo electric crystal technology

•  Kaer Biotherapeutics •  For Biomolecules, aerosolisation of pure

molecules

Page 13: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Dry Powder Nebuliser

Page 14: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Alternatives to Current Technologies

•  BI •  Aqueous solution mechanically propelled

New technologies update the concept of nebulisation, open new markets, improve performance.

Respimat

Dry Powder

Supraer

•  Microdose Therapeutics •  Based on piezo electric crystal technology

•  Kaer Biotherapeutics •  For Biomolecules, aerosolisation of pure

molecules

Page 15: Choosing the right device: The case for nebulisers

Nebulisers: The best Platform for

Telehealth?

And Finally