Upload
voxuyen
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Mohamad Kamal
Bin A. Rahim who helped me throughout my project by guiding me in preparing my
project and providing me with necessary ideas and suggestions in improving my project.
I am grateful to all my seniors which are Mr. Haizal, Mr. Openg and Mr. Thelaha
who unconditionally provides me with guidance, suggestions and support in every
possible aspects during the execution of the project.
Special gratitude goes to my beloved Lynette Er Juok See for the moment spent
with me inspiring ideas as well as in the form of support along the way to carry out the
study.
Last but not least, my heartfelt appreciation goes to all friends who have or
indirectly contributed in completing this study.
v
ABSTRACT
Active integrated antenna (AIA) with image reject mixer (IRM ) operating at
licenseless frequency of 2.4 GHz and intermediate frequency (IF) of 50 MHz is proposed.
The opted IF of 50 MHz proves to yield satisfactory result in previous rather similar
work. In this work, IRM is integrated with microstrip patch antenna on the similar
substrate to attain size, weight and cost reduction. The suitable substrate that serves as the
common platform for all integral components is FR-4 with dielectric constant of 4.7 and
thickness of 1.6mm. This AIA with IRM employs at different phase manipulation
approach from that of the previous research in which the RF signal from the antenna feed
is initially fed to an 1800 rat race coupler instead of a 900 coupler. Practically, this system
is able to achieve image suppression with an isolation of approximately 20 dB between
the image and desired frequency with 7 dBm LO drive at 2.35 GHz. The method of
moment (MoM) and lumped circuit element simulation using Agilent’s ADS software are
employed in this work. The integral components of AIA with IRM consist of microstrip
2-elements patch antenna, singly balanced schottky diode mixers, low pass filter, branch-
line 900 hybrid coupler lumped element 900 coupler and 1800 rat race coupler. The
purpose and significance of this research emerge from the disadvantages that
superheterodyne receiver presents in achieving image suppression. Relatively, IRM can
reasonably suppress image at a lower size, weight, complexity and cost by means of
phase cancellation. The design of AIA with IRM requires the achievement of balance
between several inevitable design trade-offs involved. Generally, the trade-offs in this
design are between size, simplicity and performance.
vi
ABSTRAK
Antenna padat (AIA) dengan penghapus frekuensi bayang(AIA with IRM) telah
dicadangkan dengan frekuensi kendalian 2.4 GHz iaitu frekuensi tanpa lesen. Frekuensi
pertengahan (IF) sebanyak 50 MHz yang dipilih membuktikan menghasilkan keputusan
yang memuaskan pada kajian-kajian lepas. Dalam kajian ini, IRM digabungkan dengan
antenna jalur pada substrat yang sama untuk mencapai pengurangan saiz, keberatan dan
kos. Substrat yang dipilih merupakan FR-4 yang mempunyai pemalar dielektrik 4.5 dan
ketebalan 1.6 mm. Antenna padat dengan penghapus frekuensi bayang memanipulasi fasa
dengan cara yang berlainan daripada yang digunakan dalam kajian-kajian lepas di mana
isyarat radio dialurkan ke penggading 1800 terlebih dahulu dan bukannya penggading
900. Secara praktikal, sistem ini berupaya mencapai penghapusan bayang dengan isolasi
sebanyak lebih kurang 20 dB di antara frekuensi bayang dan frekuensi yang dikehendaki
dengan pemacuan LO sebanyak 7 dBm pada 2.35 GHz. Simulasi secara momen (MoM)
dan elemen litar menggunakan perisian ADS dari Agilent. Komponen gabungan bagi
projek ini ialah antenna microstrip 2-elemen, penggabung, penapis laluan rendah dan
penggading 900 , penggading 900 unsur tergumpal dan penggading 1800. Haluan dan
kepentingan bagi kajian ini adalah susulan kelemahan yang dipamerkan oleh penerima
superheterodyne dalam mencapai penghapusan frekuensi baying. Penghapus frekuensi
bayang boleh mencapai penghapusan bayang pada kos, keberatan, kompleksiti dan size
yang lebih rendah. Perekaan antenna padat dengan IRM (AIA with IRM) memerlukan
pencapaian keseimbangan antara beberapa kelemahan dan kebaikan. Secara keseluruhan,
keseimbangan antara kebaikan dan keburukan bagi projek ini adalah antara saiz,
keringkasan dan prestasi.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
DECLARATION
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF FIGURES xi
LIST OF TABLES xvii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xviii
LIST OF APPENDICES xix
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Statement and Background of Problem 3
1.3 Objective 4
1.4 Scope of Project 4
1.5 Organization of Thesis 5
1.6 Summary 7
2 ACTIVE INTEGRATED ANTENNA 8
2.1 Introduction 8
2.2 Types of AIA 9
2.2.1 Oscillator Type 9
viii
2.2.2 Amplifier Type 10
2.2.3 Frequency Conversion Type 10
2.3 Microstrip Antenna 11
2.4 Summary 13
3 TYPES OF RECEIVER 14
3.1 Introduction 14
3.2 Image Frequency 14
3.3 Direct Conversion Receiver (DCR) 16
3.4 Superheterodyne Receiver 17
3.5 Image Reject Mixers (IRM) 19
3.5.1 Hartley Architecture 19
3.5.2 Weaver Architecture 21
3.5.3 Basic IRM 24
3.6 Summary 26
4 AIA WITH IRM SUBSYSTEMS 27
4.1 Mixer 27
4.1.1 Introduction 28
4.1.2 Conversion Loss 29
4.1.3 Noise Figure 29
4.1.4 Port-to-Port Isolation 29
4.1.5 Image Rejection Ratio (IRR) 31
4.2 Antenna 33
4.2.1 Characteristic Impedance 33
4.2.2 Reflection Coefficient 33
4.2.3 VSWR and Return Loss (RL) 34
4.2.4 Radiation Pattern 35
4.2.5 HPBW 37
4.2.6 Bandwidth 37
4.2.7 Polarization 38
ix
4.3 Summary 39
5 DESIGN METHODOLOGY 40
5.1 System Description 40
5.2 Design Flow Chart 43
5.2.1 General Design Flow Chart 43
5.2.2 2-Elements Patch Antenna Design 45
5.2.3 1800 Rat Race Coupler Design 49
5.2.4 900 Coupler Design 52
5.2.5 Lumped Element Low Pass Filter 55
Design
5.2.6 Lumped Element 900 Coupler 58
Design
5.2.7 AIA with IRM Design 62
5.3 Design and Selection of AIA with IRM 69
integral parts
5.3.1 2-Elements Patch Antenna 69
5.3.1.1 Substrate Selection 69
5.3.1.2 Element Width and Length 71
5.3.1.3 Position of Inset Feed 73
5.3.2 Mixer 76
5.3.3 Local Oscillator (LO) 78
5.3.4 Low Pass Filter (LPF) 79
5.3.5 900 Hybrid Coupler 82
5.3.6 1800 Rat Race Coupler 85
5.3.7 Lumped Element 900 Coupler 86
5.4 Gantt Chart 88
5.5 Summary 89
x
6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 90
6.1 2-Elements Patch Antenna 90
6.1.1 Layout Dimensions 90
6.1.2 Return Loss 93
6.1.3 Radiation Pattern 95
6.2 900 Hybrid Coupler 98
6.2.1 Layout Dimensions 98
6.1.2 S Parameters 102
6.3 1800 Rat Race Coupler 106
6.3.1 Layout Dimensions 106
6.3.2 S Parameters 107
6.4 Lumped Element Low Pass Filter 108
6.4.1 Insertion Loss 109
6.5 Lumped Element 900 Coupler 110
6.5.1 S Parameters 111
6.6 AIA with IRM 112
6.6.1 Simulated Result 113
6.6.1.1 When 2.3 GHz 113
6.6.1.2 When 2.4 GHz 120
6.6.2 Measured Result 127
6.6.2.1 When 2.3 GHz 127
6.6.2.2 When 2.4 GHz is 129
6.7 Summary 132
7 CONCLUSION 133
7.1 Conclusion 133
7.2 Proposed Future Works 136
7.3 Summary 136
REFERENCES 137
Appendices A-B 140-153
xi
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
2.1 Microstrip antenna configuration 12
3.1 Superheterodyne receiver 18
3.2 Hartley architecture 21
3.3 Weaver architecture 22
3.4 Graphical analysis of Weaver architecture 23
3.5 Problem of secondary image 23
in Weaver architecture
3.6 Basic IRM circuit 24
4.1(a) Three-dimensional antenna radiation 36
polar pattern
4.2(b) Two-dimensional antenna radiation pattern 37
5.1 AIA with IRM 40
5.2(a) Part I of design flow chart 44
5.2(b) Part II of design flow chart 44
5.3 2-elements patch antenna design flow chart 46
5.4 Illustration of the W, L and 50 ohm position of 47
the inset feed of a rectangular patch antenna
5.5 Illustration of the half wavelength 50 ohm 47
microstrip cascading line
5.6 Illustration of the quarter wavelength 50 ohm 48
Microstrip extension line
5.7 Fabricated 2-elements patch antenna 48
5.8 1800 rat race coupler design flow chart 50
5.9 Illustration of the W of ring and feeds and radius 50
xii
of ring
5.10 1800 rat race coupler with output ports extended 51
Equally
5.11 Fabricated 1800 rat race coupler 51
5.12 900 coupler design flow chart 53
5.13 900 coupler 53
5.14 The three 900 couplers with input and output 54
ports extended equally
5.15 Fabricated 900 couplers 54
5.16 Lumped element low pass filter design 56
flow chart
5.17 Lumped element low pass filter with optimally 56
tuned values
5.18 Lumped element low pass filter with 57
approximated values
5.19 Fabricated lumped element low pass filter 57
5.20 Lumped element 900 coupler design flow chart 59
5.21 Optimally tuned lumped element 900 coupler 59
5.22 Approximated values lumped element 900 coupler 60
5.23 Fabricated lumped element 900 coupler 61
5.24 AIA with IRM design flow chart 64
5.25 Singly balanced mixer configuration 65
5.26 Simulated return loss at RF, LO and IF ports of 65
singly balanced mixer
5.27 VTO-8150 Power Output, Frequency and 66
Modulation Sensitivity vs Tuning Voltage
5.28 Typical conversion loss vs local oscillator power 66
of HSMS-8101 Schottky mixer diode
5.29 MixerIMT component 67
5.30 4-ports S-parameters file data item 67
5.31 Circuitry of AIA with IRM 68
xiii
5.32 Fabricated AIA with IRM 68
5.33(a) Variation of normalized input resistance when 75
Moving from y=0 to y=L
5.33(b) Rectangular patch antenna 75
5.34 HSMS-8101 Schottky mixer diode selection 78
Factors
5.35 VTO-8150 selection factors 79
5.36 Dimension of 900 coupler 82
5.37 Lange coupler in layout microstrip form 83
5.38 A tapered coupled line 1800 coupler 86
5.49 Lumped element 900 coupler 87
5.40(a) Gantt chart for Sem I 88
5.40(b) Gantt chart for Sem II 88
6.1(a) Layout labels 92
6.1(b) Layout dimensions 92
6.2 Simulated return loss 94
6.3 Measured return loss 95
6.4(a) Simulated E-field radiation pattern 96
6.4(b) Simulated H-field radiation pattern 97
6.5(a) Measured E-field radiation pattern 97
6.5(b) Measured H-field radiation pattern 98
6.6(a) Circuit simulation element of 900 coupler 99
6.6(b) Layout dimensions of 900 coupler 100
6.7(a) 900 coupler for Schottky singly balanced mixer A 101
6.7(b) 900 coupler for Local Oscillator 101
6.7(c) 900 coupler for Schottky singly balanced mixer B 101
6.8(a) Schottky singly balanced mixer A 900 coupler 103
S parameter magnitudes versus frequency
6.8(b) Schottky singly balanced mixer A 900 coupler 103
S parameter phase versus frequency
xiv
6.9(a) Local Oscillator 900 coupler S parameter 104
magnitudes versus frequency
6.9(b) Local Oscillator 900 coupler S parameter 104
phase versus frequency
6.10(a) Schottky singly balanced mixer B 900 coupler 105
S parameter magnitudes versus frequency
6.10(b) Schottky singly balanced mixer B 900 coupler 105
S parameter phase versus frequency
6.11 Layout label 106
6.12 S parameter magnitudes versus frequency for the 107
1800 rat race coupler
6.13 S parameter phase versus frequency for the 1800 108
rat race coupler
6.14 Lumped element low pass filter 108
6.15 S parameter magnitudes versus frequency for 109
lumped element low pass filter
6.16 Lumped element 900 coupler 110
6.17 S parameter magnitudes versus frequency for 111
the lumped element 900 coupler
6.18 S parameter phase versus frequency for the 111
lumped element 900 coupler
6.19 Circuitry of AIA with IRM 112
6.20 Fabricated AIA with IRM 113
6.21(a) Unfiltered signal viewed from 0 to 5 GHz at 114
branch A, VifA
6.21(b) Unfiltered signal viewed from 0 to 5 GHz at 114
branch B, VifB
6.22(a) Filtered signal viewed from 0 to 5 GHz at 115
branch A, ViffA
6.22(b) Filtered signal viewed from 0 to 5 GHz at 115
branch B, ViffB
xv
6.23(a) Filtered signal viewed from 10 MHz to 100 MHz 116
(before passing through the coupler) at
branch A, ViffA
6.23(b) Filtered signal viewed from 10 MHz to 100 MHz 116
(before passing through the coupler) at
branch B, ViffB
6.24(a) Signal after passing through lumped element 117
900 coupler at branch A, IFA
6.24(b) Signal after passing through lumped element 117
900 coupler at branch B, IFB
6.25(a) Filtered signal in time domain (before passing 118
through the coupler) at branch A, ViffA
6.25(b) Filtered signal in time domain (before passing 119
through the coupler) at branch B, ViffB
6.26(a) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 119
coupler in time domain at branch A, IFA
6.26(b) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 120
coupler in time domain at branch B, IFB
6.27(a) Filtered signal viewed from 10 MHz to 100 MHz 121
(before passing through the coupler) at
branch A, ViffA
6.27(b) Filtered signal viewed from 10 MHz to 100 MHz 121
(before passing through the coupler) at
branch B, ViffB
6.28(a) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 122
coupler in time domain at branch A, IFA
6.28(b) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 122
coupler in time domain at branch B, IFB
6.29(a) Filtered signal in time domain (before passing 123
through the coupler) at branch A, ViffA
6.29(b) Filtered signal in time domain (before passing 123
xvi
through the coupler) at branch B, ViffB
6.30(a) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 124
coupler in time domain at branch A, IFA
6.30(b) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 124
coupler in time domain at branch B, IFB
6.31(a) Unfiltered signal viewed from 0 to 5 GHz at 125
branch A, VifA
6.31(b) Unfiltered signal viewed from 0 to 5 GHz at 125
branch B, VifB
6.32(a) Filtered signal viewed from 0 to 5 GHz at 126
branch A, ViffA
6.32(b) Filtered signal viewed from 0 to 5 GHz at 126
branch B, ViffB
6.33(a) Signal before passing through lumped element 900 128
coupler in time domain at branch A, ViffA
6.33(b) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 128
coupler in time domain at branch B, ViffB
6.34(a) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 129
coupler in time domain at branch A, IFA
6.34(b) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 129
coupler in time domain at branch B, IFB
6.35(a) Signal before passing through lumped element 900 130
coupler in time domain at branch A, ViffA
6.35(b) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 130
coupler in time domain at branch B, ViffB
6.36(a) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 131
coupler in time domain at branch A, IFA
6.36(b) Signal after passing through lumped element 900 131
coupler in time domain at branch B, IFB
xviii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ADS - Advanced Design System
AIA - Active Integrated Antenna
AIA with IRM - Active Integrated Antenna with Image Reject Mixer
BW - Bandwidth
CAD - Computer Aided Design
DCR - Direct Conversion Receiver
dB - Decibel
GHz - Giga Hertz
IF - Intermediate Frequency
kHz - Kilo Hertz
L - Length
LAN - Local Area Network
LO - Local Oscillator
MHz - Mega Hertz
mm - millimeter 0C - degree Celcius 0K - degree Kelvin
R - Radius
RF - Radio Frequency
VTO - Voltage Tuned Oscillator
W - Width
Z0 - Characteristic Impedance
xix
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TITLE PAGE
A Varactor Tuned Oscillator 140
B Surface Mount Microwave Schottky 148
Mixer Diodes
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
The terminology of “active integrated antenna” indicates specifically that
the passive antenna elements and the active circuitry are integrated on the same
substrate. Due to the mature technology of microwave integrated circuit (MIC)
and monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC), the active integrated
antenna (AIA) became an area of growing interest in recent years1. Incorporation
of active devices functions directly into active integrated antenna reduces the
size, weight, and cost of many microwave systems2.
Active integrated antenna can be categorized by the function of active
devices they integrate. Depending on the function of the active device, the active
integrated antennas can be categorized into the oscillator type, the amplifier type
and the frequency conversion type3, 4, 5, 6. An active integrated antenna is
classified as frequency conversion type when a microstrip antenna is integrated
with an active device for the intention of frequency translation.
In this work, Image Reject Mixer (IRM) is integrated with microstrip
patch antenna for the purpose of translating radio frequency (RF) to Intermediate
Frequency (IF) and provide isolation to two possible IF namely Upper Sideband
(USB) and Lower Sideband (LSB) in which USB or LSB might be the desired
2
frequency while the other one is the image frequency. Hence, active integrated
antenna (AIA) with Image Reject Mixer (IRM) can be categorized as frequency
conversion type active integrated antenna. The IF frequency chosen for this work
is 50 MHz which directly indicate that the LO frequency might be 2.35 GHz or
2.45 GHz depending on whether low or high side injection is utilized. The 2.35
GHz is the LO frequency of this work as low side injection is employed. The 50
MHz IF frequency is chosen with reference to several approximately similar IRM
work which prove to yield acceptable and good results by using this IF
frequency.
In heterodyne receiver, often, it is not practical to filter out the image
because the IF frequency is low, and the image is therefore too close to RF and
LO frequencies to filter out the image signal high-Q image-reject filter has to be
used between low noise amplifier (LNA) and mixer. The shortcomings of
utilizing external image-reject filter are increased cost, increased board area,
reduced reliability and increased weight7. Besides, double conversion is
employed in most of the superheterodyne receiver for better image suppression at
the expense of increased circuit complexity and cost As such, one cost effective
and practical way of rejecting image signal is to use IRM which remove the need
of external image-reject filter and one or more stages of up/down conversion8.
In this work, by integrating IRM with antenna, size reduction is achieved
by two means; the removal of space consuming external image-reject filter and
incorporation of IRM directly into active integrated antenna. Meanwhile, cost
reduction is achieved by removing the need of using external image-reject filter.
3
1.2 Statement and Background of the problem
In reducing the cost and the size of a communication system to meet the
growing demand in these aspect, active integrated antennas appear as one of the
ideal choices as they can reduce size, weight and cost of many communication
systems2. In this work, IRM is incorporated directly in AIA to achieve size,
weight and cost reduction. Moreover, using IRM instead of heterodyne
architecture which requires expensive and space-consuming external image-filter
has already served to reduce the cost and size.
In most of the previous research, IRM and antenna are two separate entity
connected via transmission line which consumes spaces and introduce losses.
J-M Mourant and S. Jurgiel9 has proposed a 6-18 GHz IRM that is
smaller and less expensive than the suspended stripline technology products. The
cost was reduced by designing a novel building blocks that could all coexist on a
single microstrip substrate. The whole IRM is put together and characterized.
P.B. Khannur and S.L Koh7 design a 2.45GHz IRM for Bluetooth
application using low-cost 0.35um, double-poly four-metal standarad CMOS
process with the metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitor option.
T.N. Ton, T.H. Chen, K.W. Chang, H. Wang, K.L. Tan, G.S. Dow, G.M.
Hayashibara, B. Allen and J. Berenz10 developed a W-band monolithic image
reject mixer utilizing pseudomorphic InGaAs/GaAs HEMT diodes. The
monolithic circuit integrated two single-balanced HEMT schottky diode mixers,
a W-band lange coupler, and a Wilkinson power divider on one chip.
The above-mentioned works share a common characteristic; there is no
direct integration with active integrated antenna which otherwise can further
reduce the size, cost and improve the performance.
4
1.3 Objective
To design, simulate and fabricate a compact Active Integrated Antenna
with Image Reject Mixer at RF of 2.4GHz and IF of 50MHz.
1.4 Scope of Project
The scope of this project comprises the design, simulation and fabrication
of a microstrip antenna integrated with image reject mixer (IRM). The integral
parts of IRM consist of 900 RF hybrids, local oscillator, low pass filters and
mixer. The frequency chosen is at 2.4GHz, which is of particular interest for
RFID application and wireless LAN. Besides, 2.4GHz frequency is chosen since
it is within the license free frequency bands, Industrial, Scientific and Medical
(ISM) bands. This design will be aided by simulation using Advance Design
System (ADS). Method of Moments (MoM) will be employed in executing the
simulation. A hierarchical approach will be used in this design. In other words,
the integral parts of the Image Reject Mixer Active Integrated Antenna (AIA
with IRM) will be designed, simulated and fabricated part by part at first before
integrating them onto one board. Mixer diodes and an oscillator with operating
frequency within 2.4GHz should be selected. This IRM AIA should be able to
detect 2.4GHz signal and isolate the two responses; upper sidebands (USB) and
lower sidebands (LSB) into separate output signals.
5
1.5 Organization of Thesis
This thesis is subsclassified into 7 chapters. Chapter I is introduction,
Chapter II is Active Integrated Antennas, Chapter III is Types Of Receiver,
Chapter IV is Elementary Parameters, Chapter V is Research Methodology,
Chapter VI is Preliminary Results and Discussions and lastly, Chapter VII is
conlcusion
Chapter I generally serves to introduce the problem and purpose of study.
Introduction consist of the basic issue of concern by indicating field of interest
which is active integrated antenna and image reject mixer with which the study is
associated.In statement and background of problem, the circumstances which
established the need and purpose of this research is presented on the basis of
referring to previous studies and researchs. The objective section defines the
specific research objectives. Last but not least, scope of project describes the
work and relevant issues or element covered in this project.
Chapter II serve to provide explanation on active integrated antenna and
the types of AIA associated with it which leads to define the category that this
design (AIA with IRM) falls in. Also, the advantages of microstrip antenna over
conventional antenna and its inherent limitation is covered which leads to the
reasoning behind choosing microstrip antenna
Chapter III provides discussion on the type of receiver available to
address image problem with definition on image frequency as the starter.
Superheterodyne receiver is revised with main discussion on the weaknesses of
superheterodyne receiver in suppressing image that prove IRM worthy of note.
Subsequent discussion on IRM begins with the long-well-known Hartley and
Weaver architecture before proceding to the more contemporary common basic
IRM.
6
Chapter IV touch on the related subsystem namely the regarding
parameters that ought to be given attention such as return loss of antenna and
conversion loss of mixers. This chapter is mainly categorized to elementary
parameters associated with mixer and antenna.
A discussion of the research design, method and procedures used is
provided in this chapter. It discusses on the how the project is implemented by
means of flow chart illustration. In this chapter, the block diagram of this system
is included which serve as a guide to the following discussion. Design
methodology of the integral parts of AIA and IRM is explained a step-by-step
approach. Also, selection methodology is discussed with the relevant factors
included. Nevertheless, Gantt chart is presented to show the general steps taken
in semester I and II.
Chapter VI present the results achieved and its corresponding discussion.
In this context, the layout dimensions and relevant circuit of the integral parts as
well as the whole system is presented. The integral parts or susbsystems of the
AIA with IRM are 2-elements patch antenna, 900 hybrid coupler, 1800 rat race
coupler, lumped element low pass filter are lumped element 900 coupler. The
simulation and measurement results are discussed for each and every integral part
before proceeding to the discussion on the final results achieved by the AIA with
IRM.
Finally in Chapter VII, presentation of the conclusions drawn from the
findings gathered and work done is focused. The conclusions is discussed
according to the studies and work done. And, few proposed future works are
make for future improvement of the project
7
1.6 Summary
This chapter generally serves to introduce the problem and
purpose of study. Introduction consist of the basic issue of concern by indicating
field of interest which is active integrated antenna and image reject mixer with
which the study is associated. In statement and background of problem, the
circumstances which established the need and purpose of this research is
presented on the basis of referring to previous studies and researchs. The
objective section defines the specific research objectives. Last but not least, scope
of project describes the work and relevant issues or element covered in this
project.
137
REFERENCES
1 J. Lin and T. Itoh, Active Integrated Antennas, IEEE Transactions On Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 42, No. 12, pp. 2186-2194, December 1994. 2 Robert A. Flynt, Lu Fan, J. A. Navarro and Kai Chang, Low Cost and Compact Active Integrated Antenna Transceiver for System Application, IEEE Transactions On Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 1642-1649, October 1996. 3 York, R. A., and Z. B. Popovic (Eds), Active and Quasi-Optical Arrays for Solid-State Power Combining, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997. 4 Navaro, J. A., and K. Chang, Integrated Active Antennas and Spatial Power Combining, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996. 5 Mortazawi, A., T. Itoh, and J. Harvey (Eds.), Active Antennas and Quasi-Optical Arrays, IEEE Press, New York, 1998. 6 Lin, J., and T. Itoh, Active Integrated Antennas, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. MTT-42, 1994, pp. 2186-2194. 7 P. B. Khannur and S.L. Koh, A 2.45GHz Fully-Differential CMOS Image-Reject Mixer for Bluetooth Application, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, pp. 439-442, 2002. 8 Bert C. Handerson, James A. Cook, Image-Reject and Single-Sideband Mxers, Watkins-Johnson Company Technical Notes, Vol. 12 No.3 May/June 1985 pp.1. 9 Jean-Marc Mourant and Stephen Jurgiel, A Broadband Planar Image Reject Mixer, IEEE MTT-S Digest, pp. 1637-1640, 1994. 10 T.N. Toh, T.H. Chen, K.W. Change, H. Wang, K.L. Tan, G.S. Dow, G.M Hayashibara, B. Allen and J. Berenz, A W-Band Monolithic InGaAs/GaAs HEMT Schottky Diode Image Reject Mixer, IEEE GaAs IC symposium, pp. 63-67, 1992.
138
11 Dahlgren, U., et al., An Integrated Millimeterwave BCB Patch Antenna HEMT Receiver, IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, 1994, pp. 661-664 12 Martinez, R.D., and R. C. Compton, A Quasi-Optical Oscillator/Modulator for Wireless Transmission, IEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, 1994, pp. 839-842 13 Angelove, I., H. Zirath, and J. Svedin, A New Mixer for Sensor Applications, IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, 1998, pp. 1051-1054 14 Montiel, C. M., L. Fan, and K. Chang, A Novel Active Antenna With Self-Mixing and Wideband Varactor-Tuning Capabilities for Communication and Vehicle Identification Application, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. MTT-44, 1996, pp. 2421-2430 15 Lin, S., Y. Qian, and T. Itoh, A Quasi-Optical Subharmonic Self-Oscillating Mixer, Proc. 28th European Microwave Conf., 1998, pp. 412-414 16 D.M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 3rd Ed. 2005. 17 R. Hartley, Single-sideband Modulator, U.S. Patent No. 1666206, April 1928 18 Behzad Razavi, RF Microelectronics, Prentice Hall PTR, University of California, Los Angeles 1998 19 D.K Weeaver, A Third Method of Generation and Detection of Single sideband Signals, Proc. IRE, Vol. 44, pp. 1703-1705, December 1956 20 IRE Subcommittee 7.9 on Noise, Description of the Noise Performance of Receiving Systems, Proc, IRE, vol. 51, 1963, p. 436 21 S . Maas, " Microwave Mixer," Artech House, Norwood, MA, 1986. 22 Jack R.Smith, Modern Communication Circuits, University of Florida, 2nd Ed, 2000. 23 James, J.R. and Hall, P. S(1989), Handbook of Microstrip Antennas, London, Peter Peregrinus Ltd. 24 C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, 2nd Edition, Arizona State University, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997.
139
25 Kapsidis, D., Chryssomallis, M.T., and Christodoulou, C.G. (2003). An Accurate Circuit Model of a Microstrip Patch Antenna for CAD Applications. Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 22-27 June. Greece: IEEE, 120-123 26 Sainati, R.A. (1996). CAD for Microstrip Antennas for Wireless Application. Boston: Artech House 27 Richards, W. F., Y. T. Lo, and D. D. Harrison, An Improved theory for Microstrip Antennas and Applications, IEEE Trans. On Antennas and Propagation, Vol. AP-29, 1981, pp. 38-46 28 Kara, M., The Resonant Frequency of Rectangular Microstrip Antenna Elements With Various Substrate Thickness, Microwave and Opt. Technol. Lett., Vol. 11, 1996, pp. 55-59 29 Hammerstad, E. O., Equations for Microstrip Circuit Design, 5th European Microwave Conf., 1975, pp. 268-272