View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chemistry 125: Lecture 35December 4, 2009
Understanding Molecular Structure and Energy
through Standard Bonds Although molecular mechanics is imperfect, it is useful for discussing molecular shapes in
terms of standard covalent bonds. Analysis of the Cambridge Structural Database shows that
predicting bond distances to within 1% requires detailed categorization of bond types. Early
attempts to predict heats of combustion in terms of composition proved adequate for physiology,
but not for chemistry. Group- or bond-additivity schemes are useful for understanding heats of
formation, especially when corrected for strain. Heat of atomization is the natural target for bond-
energy schemes, but experimental measurement requires spectroscopic determination of the heat
of atomization of elements in their standard states.For copyright
notice see final page of this filePRELIMINARY
Mol4D(CMBI Radboud University, Nijmegen, NL)
Flexible c-Hexane Click to Animate
or go to http://cheminf.cmbi.ru.nl/wetche/organic/cyclohexane/jm/twist_boat.html
Flexible or Twist-Boat Form
Barrier (Boat)~ 1 kcal/mol
The boat is not an isomer (an energy minimum), it is a barrier on the pleasantly smooth path between twist-boat isomers.
Axial Methylcyclohexane(by Molecular Mechanics)
0.49 Stretch 0.00
0.96 Bend 0.00
0.14 Stretch-Bend -0.00
3.08 Torsion 2.82
-1.31 Non-1,4 VDW 6.12
5.31 1,4 VDW 7.61
8.66 TOTAL 16.55
“Idealized”0.49
0.96
0.14
3.08
-1.31
5.31
8.66
Relaxed
H
CH3
Substituted Cyclohexanes
6 gauche butanes
8 gauche butanes !
Axial - Equatorial= 1.7 kcal/mol
for CH3
[ ~2 gauche 2 anti ]
“A-value”a spectroscopic
measure of group “size”
8.66
0.60.6
FClBrI
0.30.6
kcal/mol
VDW radius increase is offset by increasing C-X distance.
Axial - Equatorial= 1.7 kcal/mol
for CH3
Substituted Cyclohexanes
“A-value”a spectroscopic
measure of group “size”
4.8
CH3
Eti-Prt-Bu
1.71.82.2
kcal/mol
no “good” torsional angle
Stretch
Bend
Stretch-Bend
Torsion
Non-1,4-VDW
1,4-VDW
TOTAL
Cyclobutane Puckering(by Molecular Mechanics)
Torsion vs. Bend
Relaxed
0.77
16.07
-0.92
11.23
-0.26
2.35
29.24
Planar
0.66
13.48
-0.78
14.81
-0.28
2.27
30.16
Stretch
Bend
Stretch-Bend
Torsion
Non-1,4-VDW
1,4-VDW
TOTAL
Cyclopentane Puckering(by Molecular Mechanics)
"Envelope"
Relaxed
0.31
2.14
-0.09
6.38
-0.51
3.19
11.42
Planar
0.19
0.51
0.02
11.53
-0.48
4.34
16.10
e.g. What is the source of the barrier
to c-hexane ring flip?
two butanegauche eclipsed
(~7 kcal/mole)
But why does the plastic model click?Baeyer Angle Strain
+7°+5°
-3°
+5°
Like a plastic model, molecular mechanics is satisfying because
not only does it say what a structure should be, it can also say “why”.
(the actual transition state is thought to be a “Half-Chair”)
Are They “True”?
YES
Are Molecular MechanicsPrograms Useful?
NO
As we work with more complex systems, they become ever more indispensable.
This is why Wikipedia alone lists 34 different schemes of 11 types for various purposes.
C
Brvan der WaalsRadius(1.9Å)
Br•••BrContact
5Å
Br neighborpositions <5Å
from manycrystals(CSD)
Nyburg & Faerman, Acta Crystallographica B41, 274-279 (1985)
C
Br
•
•In order to balance attraction from
more distant atoms, the closest atoms must be "too" close and repulsive.
Bondedbromineatoms
may not be“spherical”!
MolecularMechanicsProgramsassume
they are!
?
Br•••BrContact
Angiostatinanti-cancer drug
“We optimized kringle 1 with the AM1 method using Gaussian 03.Plasminogen kringle 1 contains 1200 atoms, which are made up of
642 heavy atoms and 578 hydrogen atoms. The job takes about650 optimization steps starting from the MM+ geometry.”
M. J. Frisch, Gaussian, Inc., 2003
largest molecule
calculated byquantum
mechanics
Despite its problemsMM is necessaryfor complex structures
Is the standard Structural Model
realistic in geometric detail?
X-Ray Diffraction
Cambridge Structural DatabaseT
otal
X-R
ay S
truc
ture
s
YearAtomsper
Structure 27 44 56 73
>500,000predictedby 2010
33,532,769atomic
positionsJan 2009
http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk
>50,000,000BONDS
75
CSD1
CSD1
Number ofMean BondLengths Tabulated.(specialized because ofinfluence of neighborson precise bond distance)
175CC
97CN
119CO
119 different types of CO bonds27 different typesof Csp3-Csp3 bonds
CSD1
mean high1/4
median low1/4
#obs
stddev
3
C* meansC bearingC,H only
C# meansany Csp3
crowdingstretches bond
evenmoreso
shortlong
R2CH CR3
R2CH CHR2
R3C CR3
RCH2 CH3
R2CH CH3
R3CH CH3
~1%
C C bond lengths
single 1.53 Ådouble 1.32triple 1.18
aromatic 1.38(one-and-a-half bonds)
single: sp3-sp2 1.50 sp2-sp2 1.46
N to
Caromatic
BondLengths
N Planar N Pyramidal
N
N+
_
poor overlap
Twist
Bimodal?
N
:
••
How Complex Must a Model beto Predict Useful Structures?
To get standard deviations in bond distance of 0.015Å(~1%) the Cambridge crew defined:
682 kinds of bonds altogether
175 different kinds of CC bonds(differing in multiplicity, hybridization,
attached groups, rings, etc.)
97 different types of CN bonds
119 different types of CO bonds
We want to understand all “Stuff”
Its Properties & Transformations
Keys:Structure (Bonds)
(Bonds?)& Energy
How Standard are Bond Energies?
Obviously there will be correction for conformation and strain,
but is there an underlying energy for composition or constitution?
Adolph Oppenheim: On the Relationship of Heat of Combustion with the Constitution of Substances.
1868
Ludimar Hermann: On the Regularity and Calculation of Heat of Combustion of Organic Compounds. By a frequently expressed need of physiology to be able to calculate heats of combustion, I have been led to study the current situation…
HCombustion by C / H Content?
SubstanceCarbons
atoms/moleHydrogensatoms/mole
Theory Hcombust
kcal/moleError
kcal/moleError
%
Graphite [1] 0 -94.05 - -
Hydrogen 0 2 -57.8 - -
c-Hexane 6 12 -911.1 -881.6 -29.5 -3
c-Hexanol 6 12 -911.1 -842.7 -68.4 -8
Ethene 2 4 -303.7
Glucose 6 12 -911.1 -670.4 -240.7 -36
Not too bad for fuel purposes, especially if one were to include some kind of correction for partial oxidation.
[-57.8] per H2
[-94.05] per C
= 2 94.05 + 2 57.8
H2C=CH2 has extra energy to give off. One of its bonds () is not very stabilizing,
so it starts unusually high in energy.
O1
O6
partially"pre-oxidized"
-316.2 +12.5 +4
Composition:Atom Additivity
How Complex Must a Model be to Predict Chemically Useful Energies?
For physiology purposes you might be content with ± 5% in heat of combustion.
But for predicting the equilibrium constant between c-hexane + 1/2 O2 and c-hexanol, being off by 1% (9 kcal/mole) means being
off in Keq by a factor ofA useful model must go beyond composition.
How about constitution?
107!
End of Lecture 35Dec. 4, 2009
Copyright © J. M. McBride 2009. Some rights reserved. Except for cited third-party materials, and those used by visiting speakers, all content is licensed under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0).
Use of this content constitutes your acceptance of the noted license and the terms and conditions of use.
Materials from Wikimedia Commons are denoted by the symbol .
Third party materials may be subject to additional intellectual property notices, information, or restrictions.
The following attribution may be used when reusing material that is not identified as third-party content: J. M. McBride, Chem 125. License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0