Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    1/54

    Page 1 of 54

    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY ILABORATORIUM TEKNIK KIMIA I

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    2/54

    Page 2 of 54

    KIND OF EXPERIMENTS

    1. Energy Losses In Pipes And Bends (FP1)

    2. Friction Losses In Small Bore Pipe (FP2)

    3. Piping System With Centrifugal Pump (KP1)

    4. Centrifugal Pump Characteristic (KP2)

    5. Fluid Measuring System (M)

    6. Liquid-Solid Fluidized Bed (FZ1)

    7. Gas-Solid Fluidized Bed And Heat Transfer (FZ2)

    8. Drag Coefficient In Air Flow (DG)

    9. Natural Convection Heat Transfer (NC)

    10. Natural And Forced Convection And Radiation Heat Transfer (NF)11. Double Pipe Heat Exchanger (HE1)

    12. Shell And Tube Heat Transfer (HE2)

    13. Condensing Vapor Heat Transfer (CV)

    14. Liquid-Liquid Mixing (MX1)

    15. Solid-Solid Mixing (MX2)

    16. Compressible Flow Through Constant Area Conduit (CF1)

    17. Compressible Flow Through Convergent-Divergent Nozzle (CF2)

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    3/54

    Page 3 of 54

    1. ENERGY LOSSES IN PIPES AND BENDS

    ObjectiveTo study the variation in friction factor, f, used in the Darcy Formula with the Reynolds number in

    both laminar and turbulent flow. The friction factor will be measured as a function of Reynolds

    number and the roughness will be calculated using the Colebrook equation.

    TheoryThe loss of head resulting from the flow of a fluid through a pipeline is expressed by the Darcy

    Formula

    2

    f2

    l

    L Vh

    D g 0.1

    where hf is the loss of head (units of length) and the average velocity is V. The friction factor, f,

    varies with Reynolds number and a roughness factor.

    Laminar flow

    The Hagen-Poiseuille equation for laminar flow indicates that the head loss is independent ofsurface roughness.

    2

    32l

    LVh

    gD

    0.2

    Thus in laminar flow the head loss varies as V and inversely as D2. Comparing equation 0.1 and

    equation 0.2 it can be shown that

    64 64f

    VD R

    0.3

    indicating that the friction factor is proportional to viscosity and inversely proportional to the velocity,pipe diameter, and fluid density under laminar flow conditions. The friction factor is independent ofpipe roughness in laminar flow because the disturbances caused by surface roughness are quicklydamped by viscosity.

    Equation 0.2 can be solved for the pressure drop as a function of total discharge to obtain

    4

    128 LQp

    D

    0.4

    Turbulent flow

    When the flow is turbulent the relationship becomes more complex and is best shown by means ofa graph since the friction factor is a function of both Reynolds number and roughness. Nikuradse

    showed the dependence on roughness by using pipes artificially roughened by fixing a coating ofuniform sand grains to the pipe walls. The degree of roughness was designated as the ratio of the sand

    grain diameter to the pipe diameter (/D).The relationship between the friction factor and Reynolds number can be determined for every

    relative roughness. From these relationships, it is apparent that for rough pipes the roughness is moreimportant than the Reynolds number in determining the magnitude of the friction factor. At high

    Reynolds numbers (complete turbulence, rough pipes) the friction factor depends entirely onroughness and the friction factor can be obtained from the rough pipe law.

    1 3.72log

    f

    D

    0.5

    For smooth pipes the friction factor is independent of roughness and is given by the smooth pipe law.

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    4/54

    Page 4 of 54

    1 Re f 2log

    2.51f

    0.6

    The smooth and the rough pipe laws were developed by von Karman in 1930.Many pipe flow problems are in the regime designated transition zone that is between the smooth

    and rough pipe laws. In the transition zone head loss is a function of both Reynolds number androughness. Colebrook developed an empirical transition function for commercial pipes. The Moodydiagram is based on the Colebrook equation in the turbulent regime.

    1 2.512log

    3.7f Re f

    D

    0.7

    The Colebrook equation can be used to determine the absolute roughness, , by experimentallymeasuring the friction factor and Reynolds number.

    1

    2 f2.51

    3.7 10 Re fD

    0.8

    Alternatively the explicit equation for the friction factor derived by Swamee and Jain can be solvedfor the absolute roughness.

    2

    0.9

    0.25f

    5.74log

    3.7 ReD

    0.9

    When solving for the roughness it is important to note that the quantity in equation 0.9 that is

    squared is negative!

    -1

    2 f

    0.9

    5.743.7 10

    ReD

    0.10

    Equations 0.8 and 0.10 are not equivalent and will yield slightly different results with the

    error a function of the Reynolds number.

    Other correlation for estimating Darcy fare following.

    Serghides Equation (for Re>2100 and any e/D)

    f= [A [(B-A)2/(C-2B+A)]]-2

    A = -2.0 log((e/D)/3.7 + 12/Re)B = -2.0 log((e/D)/3.7 + 2.51A/Re)

    C = -2.0 log((e/D)/3.7 + 2.51B/Re)

    Moody Equation (4000

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    5/54

    Page 5 of 54

    Churchill Equation (for all values of Re and e/D)

    f= 8((8/Re)12 + 1/(A+B)1.5)1/12

    A = (-2.457ln((7/Re)0.9 + 0.27e/D))16

    B = (37530/Re)16

    Chen Equation (for all values of Re and e/D)

    1/(f)1/2 = -2.0log((e/D)/3.7065 5.0452A/Re)

    A = log((e/D)1.1098/2.8257 + (5.8506/Re0.8981))

    Zigrang and Sylvester Equation (for 4000

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    6/54

    Page 6 of 54

    4. CENTRIFUGAL PUMP CHARACTERISTIC

    A centrifugal pump converts the input power to kinetic energy in the liquid by accelerating the liquid

    by a revolving device - an impeller. The most common type is the volute pump. Fluid enters the pumpthrough the eye of the impeller which rotates at high speed. The fluid is accelerated radially outwardfrom the pump chasing. A vacuum is created at the impellers eye that continuously draws more fluidinto the pump.

    The energy created by the pump is kinetic energy according the Bernoulli Equation. The energytransferred to the liquid corresponds to the velocity at the edge or vane tip of the impeller. The fasterthe impeller revolves or the bigger the impeller is, the higher will the velocity of the liquid energytransferred to the liquid be. This is described by the Affinity Laws.

    Pressure and HeadThe kinetic energy of a liquid coming out of an impeller is obstructed by the pump casing whichcatches the liquid and slows it down. When the liquid slows down the kinetic energy is converted topressure energy. In Newtonian fluids the term head is used to measure the kinetic energy which apump creates. Head is a measurement of the height of the liquid column the pump creates from thekinetic energy the pump gives to the liquid.

    The main reason for using head instead of pressure to measure a centrifugal pump's energy is that the

    pressure from a pump will change if the specific gravity of the liquid changes, but the head will not.

    The maximum head of a pump is mainly determined by the outside diameter of the pump's impellerand the speed of the rotating shaft. The head will change as the capacity of the pump is altered.

    The pump's performance on any Newtonian fluid can always be described by using the term head.There are different term associated to pump head, such as: Total Static Head, Total Dynamic Head(Total System Head), Static Suction Head, Static Suction Lift, Static Discharge Head, Dynamic

    Suction Head/Lift, and Dynamic Discharge Head.

    Suction Head

    Low pressure at the suction side of a pump can encounter the fluid to start boiling with reducedefficiency, cavitations, and even damage of the pump as a result. Boiling starts when the pressure inthe liquid is reduced to the vapor pressure of the fluid at the actual temperature.

    Based on the Energy Equation - the suction head in the fluid close to the impeller can be expressed as

    the sum of the static and the velocity head:

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    7/54

    Page 7 of 54

    hs = ps / + vs2

    / 2 g (1)

    where hs = suction head close to the impeller, ps = static pressure in the fluid close to the impeller, =specific weight of the fluid, vs = velocity of fluid, and g = acceleration of gravity.

    Liquids Vapor Head

    The liquids vapor head at the actual temperature can be expressed as:

    hv= pv / (2)

    where hv= vapor head, pv= vapor pressure

    Net Positive Suction Head - NPSH

    The Net Positive Suction Head - NPSH - can be expressed as the difference between the Suction Headand the Liquids Vapor Head and expressed like

    NPSH = hs - hv (3)

    or NPSH = ps / + vs2

    / 2 g - pv / (3a)

    Available NPSH - NPSHa

    The Net Positive Suction Head made available at the suction system for the pump is often

    named NPSHa. The NPSHa can be determined during design and construction, or determined

    experimentally from the actual physical system.

    For a common application - where the pump lifts a fluid from an open tank at one level to an other,the energy or head at the surface of the tank can be expressed as:

    h0= hs + hl (4)

    where h0 = head at surface, hs = head before the impeller, hl= head loss from the surface to impeller.

    In an open tank, the head at the surface can be expressed as:

    patm / = ps / + vs2

    / 2 g + he + hl (4a)

    where he = elevation from surface to pump - positive if pump is above the tank, negative if the pump isbelow the tank.

    The head available before the impeller can be expressed as:

    ps / + vs2

    / 2 g = patm / - he - hl (4b)

    or as the available NPSHa:

    NPSHa = patm / - he - hl - pv / (4c)

    Required NPSH - NPSHr

    The NPSHr, called as the Net Suction Head as required by the pump in order to prevent

    cavitation for safe and reliable operation of the pump. The required NPSHrfor a particular

    pump is in general determined experimentally by the pump manufacturer and a part of thedocumentation of the pump.

    The available NPSHa of the system should always exceeded the required NPSHrof the pump to avoidvaporization and cavitation of the impellers eye. The available NPSHa should in general be significanthigher than the required NPSHrto avoid that head loss in the suction pipe and in the pump casing,local velocity accelerations and pressure decreases, start boiling the fluid on the impeller surface.Note that the required NPSHrincreases with the square capacity.

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    8/54

    Page 8 of 54

    Regulating discharge flow capacityThe capacity of a centrifugal pump can be regulated either at constant speed, or varying speed.

    Capacity Regulating by Varying Speed

    Speed regulating is energy efficient since the energy to thepump is reduced with the decrease of speed. The change inpower consumption, head and volume rate can beestimated with the affinity laws.

    Capacity Regulating by Constant SpeedCapacity can be regulated at constant speed by throttling, bypassing flow, changing impeller diameter,

    or modifying the impeller.

    ThrottlingThrottling can be carried out by opening and closing a

    discharge valve. Throttling is energy inefficient since the

    energy to the pump is not reduced. Energy is wasted by

    increasing the dynamic loss.

    Bypassing Flow

    The discharge capacity can be regulated by leading a part ofthe discharge flow back to the suction side of the pump.

    Bypassing the flow is energy inefficient since the energy tothe pump is not reduced.

    Changing the Impeller DiameterReducing the impellers diameter is a permanent change and the method can be used where the change

    in process demand is temporary. The method may be energy efficient if the motor is changed and theenergy consumption reduced.

    Modifying the Impeller

    The flow rate and the head can be modulated by changing the pitch of the blades. Complicated andseldom used.

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    9/54

    Page 9 of 54

    For non-cavitating flow of an incompressible fluid through a pump of specified geometry, thepressure rise can be expressed as

    DNQfP ,,,, (5)

    Where P = pressure rise across the pump (N m-2)Q = volumetric flow rate (m

    3s

    -1)

    = fluid density (kg m-3)

    = fluid viscosity (N s m-2

    )N = rotational speed (radians/s)D = a typical dimension such as diameter.

    Using dimensional analysis one can obtain

    ),(2

    3122

    ND

    ND

    Qf

    DN

    P

    (6)

    The dimensionless pressure rise is thus related to the dimensionless flow rate and a Reynolds number,Re, defined as

    DND..Re

    For a turbo machine, it is found that if Reynolds number is greater than some critical value, then thedimensionless pressure rise becomes independent of the Reynolds number.

    The apparatus consists of a simple flow loop as shown in the Figure ?.1. The pump is of turbineimpeller type with directly coupled to the motor. The rotational speed of the motor is 2880 rpm. Theflow rate could be controlled by valve A, valve B, or both.

    The mass flow rate can measured from the time required to collect a certain volume of liquid in the

    top tank or by reading the liquid level in the top tank (for higher flow rate).

    Static pressure tapings are placed at the suction side, P1, and discharge side, P2, of the pump. Thepresence of bubbles in the suction flow can be observed through the sight glass C.

    Procedure.

    Valve B

    Valve A

    P1

    P2

    Sight Glass C

    Bottom Tank

    Top Tank

    Pump

    Figure ?.1.

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    10/54

    Page 10 of 54

    1. Before starting the pump, make sure that the bottom tank has enough water. The pH of the wateris adjusted to slightly alkaline to reduce corrosion and a dye is added so the water color turns red.

    2. Open fully both valve A and B. Turns on the pump and wait for a few minutes to get a steadyflow. Adjust the discharge valve B to avoid overfilling the top tank.

    Data collection.You are required to collect data of1. discharge pressure rise against flow rate at three different values of suction pressure.

    2. flow rate against decreasing suction pressure at some constant discharge pressure. Adjust bothvalve A and B to control.

    Do not forget to note the sound of the pump, the presence of bubble in the flow, thestability of pressure readings, the difficulty of controlling the pressures, and so on.

    Data analysis1. Confirm that eq.6 is valid for flow in the absence of cavitations and for Reynolds number above a

    critical value its value become unimportant.Using SI unit calculate

    2

    322and,,

    ND

    ND

    Q

    DN

    P

    Plot the first and the second dimensionless groups against the last for your experimental data. Canyou observe the effect of cavitations?

    Theory suggests that a simplification will roughly yield parabolic curve with an intercept of a

    little bit higher than 0.125 on the22DN

    P

    axis. Does your experimental data confirm this?

    2. Calculate Suction Specific Speed,

    43

    21

    a

    SSNPSH

    QN

    against suction pressure at some constant discharge pressure. A rule of thumb says that to avoidcavitations, the suction specific speed should be below 5200 (Metric Unit). Does yourexperimental data confirm this?

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    11/54

    Page 11 of 54

    5. FLUID MEASURING SYSTEM

    THE VENTURI METER

    OBJECTIVE:

    1. Experimental verification of the Bernoulli equation.

    2. To measure the discharge and to investigate the characteristic of a Venturi Meter, Orifice,and Rotameter.

    Description of the main component of the set-up:

    The Venturi meter used in this experiment consists of successive converging, uniform and

    diverging sections equipped with pressure taps at selected locations See Fig. 1 for a

    schematic diagram.

    Experimental method:

    1 2 3 4 5, 6 7

    8

    9

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    12/54

    Page 12 of 54

    A flow rate is supplied through the test section. After steady state flow is achieved the flow

    rate is measured by a flow meter. The pressure variation along the test section is measured by

    the use of piezometer tubes. The experiment is repeated for two more flow rates.

    THEORY

    (a). Bernoulli Equation

    Assume that the following apply:

    Steady flow Incompressible flow Flow along a streamline No frictional forces

    The Bernoulli equation, which expresses the principle of conservation of linear momentum

    under special circumstances, can written as :

    2

    2

    221

    2

    11

    22gz

    VPgz

    VP

    (1)

    In addition, let assume 21 zz . Therefore, we have

    22

    2

    22

    2

    11 VPVP

    (2)

    Let us consider the continuity equation (conservation of mass) and limit it to the same

    assumption as above. Then we have

    2211 AVAV

    where

    4

    2

    11

    DA

    4

    2

    2

    2

    DA (3)

    2

    2

    1

    1

    2

    1

    2

    D

    D

    A

    A

    V

    V(4)

    Solving forP2

    from equation (2)

    2

    1

    2

    1

    2

    2

    112

    V

    V

    VPP

    Substituting forV2

    / V1

    from equation (4)

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    13/54

    Page 13 of 54

    2

    1

    4

    2

    1

    2

    112

    D

    D

    VPP

    Noting that

    11 AVm

    11

    A

    mV

    21

    2

    1A

    mV

    4

    2

    1

    2

    1

    2

    12 1

    2 D

    D

    A

    mPP

    (5)

    orpressure at any location x is given by

    4

    1

    2

    1

    2

    1 12 xD

    D

    A

    mPxP

    (6)

    or, since

    g

    xPxh

    )()(

    one can write

    4

    1

    2

    1

    2

    2

    1)(

    12

    )(xD

    D

    Ag

    mhxh

    (7)

    Hence the pressure head at any location along the test section can be expressed in term of the

    pressure at a reference location (inlet).

    (b). Venturi meter

    Assuming that there is no loss of energy along the pipe, and that the velocity and

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    14/54

    Page 14 of 54

    piezometric heads are constant across each of the sections considered, then Bernoullis

    theorem states that

    (8)

    Where u1, u2 and un are the velocities of flow through section 1, 2, and n. The equation of

    continuity is

    (9)

    Q denotes the volume flow or discharge rate.

    Substituting in equation (8) for u1 from equation (9)

    (10)

    And solving this equation for u2 leads to

    (11)

    So that the discharge rate, from equation becomes:

    (12)

    In practice, there is some loss of energy between sections 1 and 2, and the velocity is not

    constant across either of these sections. Consequently, measured values of Q usually fall

    a little short of those calculated from equation (3) and it is customary to allow for this

    discrepancy by writing:

    (13)

    C is known as the coefficient of the meter, which may be established by experiment. Its

    value varies slightly from one meter to another and even for a give meter it may vary

    slightly with the discharge, but usually lies within the range of 0.92 to 0.99.

    (c). Orifice meter

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    15/54

    Page 15 of 54

    The governing equation is similar to eq.(13) of the venturi meter, but with different values of

    coefficient and characteristic.

    (14)

    Experimental Procedure

    1. Connect the Venturi Meter apparatus to the water supply line.

    2. Adjust the water flow rate by the flow control valve until a steady reading of 10

    liters/min is observed by the use of the flow meter.

    3. Ensure that the water heights in the piezometer tubes become stabilized.

    4. Read and record these heights in mm.

    5. Change the flow rate to 12 liters/min and repeat steps 3, 4.

    6. Change the flow rate to 14 liters/min and repeat steps 3, 4.

    Lab Report Requirements

    1. Determine the mass flow rate for each run.

    2. Perform the calculations for each flow-rate and compare with the measured values.

    a. Evaluate xh for each pressure location using the corresponding diameter xD .b. Record the xh values in Table 2.

    3. Calculate % error between theoretical and experimental results and list it in the

    appropriate row in Table 2.

    5 6 7

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    16/54

    Page 16 of 54

    Note: %100%exp

    exp

    h

    hhERROR

    calor %100%

    cal

    cal

    h

    hhERROR

    exp

    depending on which of and you consider to be more accurate. You must give a

    justifying statement as to which one you consider to be more accurate.

    4. Plot xh vs. x for both theoretical and experimental data for the three different flowrates separately, i.e. each graph should include a set of theoretical and a set of

    experimental data points.

    5. Considering the assumptions given in the beginning of this write-up, is it all proofed

    to be true? Explain.

    6. For Venturi meter and Orifice meter, plot Cvs. NRe and compare with data on the

    textbook. Give comments.

    7. Plot the head loss for the rotameter vs. fluid velocity.

    Note: For theoretical pressure calculations for stations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 the

    distance is measured from station 1, and the measured pressure at station 1 must

    be assumed to be the inlet pressure.

    Table 1

    Experimental values of pressure as a function of flow-rate: m in (kg/sec) and h in

    (mm of water).

    Q

    mh

    1

    h2

    h3

    h4

    h5

    h6

    h7 8h 9h

    Table 1a

    Corrected experimental values of pressure as a function of flow-rate: m in (kg/sec)

    and h in (mm of water).

    Q m h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 h7 8h 9h

    Table 2

    Theoretical values of pressure as a function of flow-rate: m in (kg/sec) and h in (mmof water).

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    17/54

    Page 17 of 54

    Q m h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 h7 8h 9h

    %error

    in h

    %

    error

    in h

    %

    error

    in h

    Figure1

    Schematic diagram of the Venturi meter

    Table 3Pressure tap locations and diameters at pressure tap locations

    Pressure

    location

    A B C D

    Diameter

    (mm)

    26 16 26

    x (mm) 0 46 156

    A

    BC

    D

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    18/54

    Page 18 of 54

    6. LIQUID-SOLID FLUIDIZED BED

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    19/54

    Page 19 of 54

    7. GAS-SOLID FLUIDIZED BED AND HEAT TRANSFER

    OBJECTIVES Observe and measure fluidization of a solid bed.

    Measure the pressure loss across the fluidized bed

    Study heat transfer in a fluidized bed.

    INTRODUCTIONPacked and fluidized beds play a major role in many chemical engineering processes.

    Packed-bed situations include such diverse processes as filtration, wastewater treatment, and

    the flow of crude oil in a petroleum reservoir. In these cases, the interest centers on the

    pressure drop through the bed as a function the volumetric flow rate or superficial velocity.

    If the particles in the bed are loose and there is sufficient volume in the device containing the

    particles, the particles may fluidize at high flow rates. Such beds inherently possess excellent

    heat transfer and mixing characteristics. In the study of the fluid-mechanical behavior of

    these beds, the focus is on the incipient fluidization velocity and the dependence of bedexpansion on the superficial velocity.

    The term fluidized bed describes a finely granulated layer of solid material (referred to as the mass)that is loosened by fluid flowing through to such an extent that the particles of solid material are freeto move to a certain degree. It is called fluidized because the solid material takes on propertiessimilar to those of a fluid. Fluidized beds are used widely in engineering for applications such as

    combustion, the cracking of high-molecular-weight petroleum fractions, drying plants, andpowder coating.

    To characterize a fluid bed, the pressure loss of the fluid flowing through the bed can be used. As the

    fluid flows through the solid material, the pressure below the mass initially rises with increasing airspeed. This occurs until the pressure forces match the weight of the mass and the material becomes

    suspended. At this point, the layer reaches a fluid state. With further increasing flow rate, the pressureloss is almost constant. After a certain flow rate, the top particles no longer fall back into the fluidized

    bed; they are drawn along with the fluid flow and removed.

    The characteristics of the transfer of heat from a heated body to the surroundings also change on the

    formation of a fluidized bed. In the solid bed, the transfer of heat is determined largely by the verylow conductivity of the mass of particles. Part of the heat is removed by the fluid flow; therefore, the

    heat transfer slowly increases with fluid flow. However, once the particles are in motion, the heattransfer is defined by the moving particles. Due to the higher specify heat capacity of the particlematerial, the heat transfer increases significantly. This allows for an extremely even temperature in

    the fluidized bed.

    THEORY

    The theory for this experiment is covered in Chapter 7 of the 4th Edition of McCabe, Smith,

    and Harriott (M,S,&H). The following material is a condensation of that chapter as it relates

    to the experiment at hand. As an aid to you, some specific equations in M,W,&H are referred

    to. The 5th Edition was recently published and is considerably revised and where possible,

    pertinent equations from that edition are given as well. However, generally speaking, the 4th

    Edition will probably be more helpful.

    There are three areas of interest to us: (1) Relationship between the pressure drop and the

    flow rate; (2) Minimum fluidization velocity, and; (3) Behavior of the expanded bed.

    (1) Relationship between the pressure drop and the flow rate

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    20/54

    Page 20 of 54

    The flow of a fluid, either liquid or gas, through a static packed bed can be described in a

    quantitative manner by defining a bed friction factor, fp, and a particle Reynolds number,

    NRe,p, as follows:

    (1.1)

    (1.2)

    where

    P = pressure drop across the bedL = bed depth or length

    gc = conversion constant (= unity if SI units are used)

    Dp = particle diameter

    = fluid density= bed porosity or void fractionVo = superficial fluid velocity

    = fluid viscositys = sphericity

    The friction factor and the Reynolds number are unitless. Some typical sphericity factors are

    given in McCabe, Smith and Harriott (4th Ed.: p. 750, Table 26-1; 5th Ed.: p. 928, Table

    28.1).

    For laminar flow, where only viscous drag forces come into play, NRe,p 20, experimentaldata may be correlated by means of the Kozeny-Carman equation:

    (1.3)

    (From combining Eqns. (7 - 21) and (7 - 23) MS& H with Eq.(2) above)

    Note: According to Yates ("Fundamentals of Fluidized-bed Chemical Processes," by J. G.

    Yates, Published by Butterworths, 1983, p. 7-8) the factor of 150 was originally given by

    Carman as 180 for the case of laminar flow. Ergun later suggested a better value was 150

    when the particles are greater than about 150 m in diameter.

    For highly turbulent flow where inertial forces predominate, NRe,p 1000, experimentalresults may instead be correlated in terms of the Blake-Plummer equation:

    (1.4)

    (From combining Eqs. (7 - 24) and (7 - 21). Also, related to Eq. (7- 20) in the 5th Ed.)

    While both equations (3) and (4) have a sound theoretical basis, Ergun empirically found that

    the friction factor could be described for all values of the Reynolds number by simply adding

    the right-hand sides of equations (3) and (4). Thus:

    (1.5)

    (2) Minimum fluidization velocity

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    21/54

    Page 21 of 54

    At a sufficiently high flow rate, the total drag force on the solid particles constituting the bed

    becomes equal to the net gravitational force and the bed becomes fluidized. For this situation

    a force balance yields:

    (1.6)

    whereM = void fraction at the minimum fluidization velocityA = cross-sectional area of the bed

    p = particle densityg = gravitational constant

    M = total mass of packing.

    This is Eq. (7-50) on Page 149 of the 4th Ed. and Eq. (7.48) of the 5th. The superficial fluid

    velocity at which the fluidization of the bed commences is called the incipient or minimum

    fluidization velocity, V0M . The incipient fluidization velocity may be determined by

    combining equations (1), (3), and (6) with the following result [Eq. (7-54), Page 149 of the4th Ed. and Eq. (7.52) of the 5th]:

    (1.7)

    This equation is the basis for some empirical equations found in the literature. The terms can

    be grouped as follows:

    (1.8)

    The first factor contains the sphericity of the particles and the bed porosity at the point of

    incipient fluidization. Neither of these factors is usually known with a high degree of

    accuracy. If spheres are assumed s 1and a reasonable value of voidage, say M 0.4 , thenthe first factor is 0.00071. The factor is quite sensitive to M . For example, ifM 0.413, thenthe factor is 0.0008.

    One investigator, [D. Geldhart, "Types of Fluidization," Powder Technology, 7 (1973), 285-

    292; Geldhart and Abrahamsen, Powder Technology, 19 (1978), 133-136] simply determined

    the first factor from his data and actually found 0.0008 to be the best value; that is, he

    reported the following correlation:

    (1.9)

    Behavior of the expanded bed

    The expansion of fluidized beds is discussed in the text on Pages 152-156 of the 4th Ed. and

    Pages 170-173 of the 5th Ed. The treatment to be used here is slightly different. For fluid

    velocities exceeding the incipient fluidization velocity, the bed expands. The porosity, , of

    an expanded bed may be related to the superficial fluid velocity, , by means of an empiricalrelation suggested by Richardson and Zaki (1,2):

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    22/54

    Page 22 of 54

    (1.10)

    where ut is the terminal velocity of a spherical particle in a fluidizing medium (3). The

    exponent, n, depends on the flow conditions -- that is, on the Reynolds number. Thus:

    NRe,p 0.2 (11)0.2 NRe,p 1.0 (12)

    1NRe,p 500 (13)NRe,p 500 (14)

    Because the terminal velocity, ut, is a constant for a given particle, it can be seen that

    Equation (10) above is essentially the same as the empirical equation in the text; namely Eq.

    (7-61), p. 152 of the 4th Ed. and Eq. (7.59), p. 171 of the 5th Ed.

    The void fraction of the expanded bed, , is related to that at incipient fluidization by thefollowing equation:

    This is Eq. (7 - 60) of the 4th Ed. and Eq. (7.58) of the 5th. (7-60) where LM and M are thebed height and void fraction at incipient fluidization, and L is the measured height of the

    expanded bed. Therefore, since LM and M are known, can be calculated from the measuredheight, L, of the expanded bed.

    In Equations (11)-(14) the Reynolds number is based on the particle diameter, Dp, and theterminal velocity, ut. Therefore it is necessary to know the terminal velocity. By means of a

    force balance it is shown that the terminal velocity for spherical particles is:

    (15)

    (Eq. (7 -39), p. 142 of the 4th Ed. and Eq. (7.37), p. 159 of the 5th.

    where CD denotes the drag coefficient.

    A graph of CD versus NRe,p is shown in the text (Figure 7-3, p. 131 of the 4th Ed. andFigure 7.6, p. 158 of the 5th Ed.).

    Thus, to find CD, you need to know ut in order to calculate NRe,p. One could do this by

    trial-and-error. Thus, you could guess ut, calculate NRe,p, look up CD on the graph, and put the

    resulting value in Eq. (15). If the calculated value of u t did not match the guess, you would

    guess again.

    However, the trial-and-error can be avoided. Square both sides of Eq. (15) and utilize the

    definition of NRe,p (Eq. (2)). One obtains:

    (16)

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    23/54

    Page 23 of 54

    All parameters on the right are known. This suggests that a plot of versus NRe,p can

    be constructed and used to avoid the trial-and-error procedure.

    The plot is prepared in the following way. Pick a series of point coordinates off the plot

    shown above. Some examples for spheres are:

    NRe,p CD

    .001 22,000 22

    .01 2,200 22

    .1 220 22

    1,000 0.48 480

    Pick off a dozen similar pairs. Then plot CDNRe,p as the ordinate against corresponding NRe,p as

    the abscissa. For each bed, calculate from Eq. (16). From your plot read the

    corresponding NRe,p . Then use Eq. (2) to calculate ut.

    Heat Transfer Coefficient

    The heat transfer coefficient can be calculated from:

    where Pis the heater power, Tis the difference between the heater and bed temperatures, and is

    the surface area of the heater. The heater surface area is the area of the cylindrical surface and theopen face.

    EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDUREIn this experiment the friction factor will be measured as a function of Reynolds number for

    the flow of air through a bed of solid particles. Experimental results will be compared with

    theoretical predictions for the appropriate flow regimes. A flowsheet of the experimental set-

    up is depicted schematically in Figure 1 at the end of this handout. The equipment includes

    two transparent beds, rotameters, manometers, a source of low pressure air, and appropriate

    valves and fittings.

    Measure the bed height after tapping the bed gently until no further change is observed.

    Close Valves B and C. Open Valve A. Control the flow of air through the system by

    manipulating Valve B or C depending on the rotameter used. Open Valve D for pressure drop

    measurements. Increase the flow rate of air in small steps noting the rotameter and

    manometer readings until the bed is fluidized and the pressure drop does not change

    appreciably. Also, record the corresponding bed height at each flow rate. Continue themeasurements until the bed is appreciably fluidized and obtain at least fifteen readings in the

    packed-bed region and ten readings in the fluidized-bed region. Decrease the flow rate noting

    the flow rate and pressure drop values.

    The region where fluidization just begins -- namely, at the "minimum fluidization velocity" --

    is of special interest. In Figure 2, it occurs at Point B. [This plot is based upon one in "Design

    for Fluidization, Part 1," by J. F. Frantz, Chemical Engineering, September 17, 1962, pp. 161-

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    24/54

    Page 24 of 54

    178.] At this point, where the pressure drop through the fixed bed becomes equal to the

    weight of the bed per unit area, a slight rearrangement of particles occurs and the particles

    shift position so as to present maximum flow area to the gas. Quoting from the article above:

    "This causes a slight decrease in pressure drop, and channeling occurs. Only at

    a higher gas velocity does the entire bed become fully supported by the gas

    stream. Leva, Shirai and Wen realized this phenomenon took place, and thusthe defined minimum fluidization velocity as a gas velocity 10% greater than

    the point at which, with increasing velocity, the pressure drop through the fixed

    bed first equals the weight of the bed per unit area."

    In view of this, repeat the run to check for reproducibility, making sure that you get sufficient

    data in the somewhat ill-defined region between Points B and D.

    The theory of this experiment is built around the assumption that at "steady state," the

    particles are uniformly distributed in the bed. As you increase the flow rate of air, take some

    notes concerning what the bed looks like at various stages. This may help to explain some

    discrepancies between measured and theoretical values.

    Repeat the measurements on the other bed by reconnecting the appropriate lines.In a separate experiment, the porosity of a container of solid particles was measured using the

    method of water displacement. This involves first weighting a measured volume of dry

    particles. Water is then slowly added to the particles until the upper surface is wet. The

    weight of the water added can then be used to calculate the porosity of the bed. This porosity

    corresponds to the value, M , in Equation (6).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

    A. Setup

    1. Check that the air compressor valve is closed.

    2. Switch on the fluidized bed equipment.3. Close the valve V1 (which controls flowrate).4. Open the valve on the air compressor.

    B. Experiment 1. Measuring the pressure loss.1. Slide the pressure sensor all the way to the bottom of the bed.

    2. Adjust the flow rate to 10 L/min. using valve V1.3. Record the flow rate and pressure.4. Increase flow rate by steps of 2 L/min.

    5. Continue to record flow rate and pressure.6. As soon as the first particle movements are seen, the loosening speed has been reached. Note

    the flow rate at this point.7. Continue increasing the flow rate by steps of 5 L/min. until a flow rate of 70 L/min. isreached.

    8. Now reduce the flow rate by steps of 5 L/min. until a flow rate of 10 L/min. is reached.9. Plot the pressure loss versus fluid velocity.

    C. Experiment 2. Measuring the pressure distribution in the fluid bed.1. Adjust the flow rate to 40 L/min. using valve V1.2. Record the pressure.3. Raise the pressure sensor 10 mm and record the pressure.

    4. Repeat measurements until the pressure sensor has reached the surface.5. Graph pressure loss versus height and compare with theoretical.

    D. Measuring Heat transfer

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    25/54

    Page 25 of 54

    1. Adjust the heater such that it is around 30 mm deep in the mass.2. Adjust the heater power to 30 W. (Note: adjust by reading the ampere and the voltage; the

    scale around the control knob is not in units of W)3. Adjust flow rate to 10 L/min.4. Wait about 5 minutes until the heater has stabilized.5. Read and note the heater temperature T1 and the fluid bed temperature T2.6. Increase flow rate by 10 L/min.7. Wait about 2 minutes. Then read the temperature three times at one-minute intervals. Record

    the average of the three temperatures.8. Repeat steps 6 and 7 until the flow rate is 70 L/min. (Note: you may have to adjust the heater

    power)

    9. Calculate the heat transfer coefficient and graph versus fluid velocity.

    E. Heat transfer as function of immersion depth.1. Adjust flow rate to 90 L/min.

    2. Adjust the height of the heater such that it is just above the surface.3. Wait about 5 minutes until the heater has stabilized.

    4. Read and note the heater temperature T1 and the fluid bed temperature T2.5. Lower the heater in 10 mm steps.6. Wait about 2 minutes. Then read the temperature three times at one-minute intervals. Record

    the average of the three temperatures.7. Repeat steps 6 and 7. (Note you may have to adjust the heater power)

    8. Calculate the heat transfer coefficient and graph versus depth.

    Calculations1. For each bed, plot the measured pressure drop (in cm of H2O) versus the volumetric

    flow rate in liters/min. There will likely be a "hysteresis effect," in that the pressure

    drop curve for increasing flow rate will differ from that for decreasing flow rate.

    Therefore, use different symbols for increasing and decreasing flow rates. Explain thelikely cause of this effect.

    2. For each bed, calculate the friction factor and corresponding Reynolds number for

    each data point using Equations (1) and (2). Then prepare a single plot of fp versus

    NRe,p which combines the results for the two beds. Use a different symbol for each bed

    and show symbols only (no lines). On this plot, also show the predicted values from

    Equations (3), (4), and (5). Show these as solid or dashed lines, and do not show the

    points used for determining these plots.

    3. From your plots in Part 1 above, determine the pressure drop at the point where

    fluidization begins in cm H2O. Using Equation (6), calculate the predicted value of the

    pressure drop at this point in cm H2O. Note that you have to know M. Leva [MaxLeva, "Chemical Engineering, November, 1957, pp. 266-270] gives a correlation thatcan be used. Alternatively, you could assume M as provided to you by the TA forthe packed bed before fluidization commences. Comment on your findings.

    4. As noted earlier, the minimum fluidization velocity, V0M , is of considerable interest.

    From your results in Part 1, calculate V0M in m/s and ft/s for each of your runs and

    beds. Using the theoretical Equation (7), calculate V0M in m/s and ft/s. Use a value of

    0.86 fors since your particles seem to be "sand-like," and the value ofM you gotfrom the plot in step 3. Several literature equations are available based on

    experimental data. Three of these will be used here for comparison with your

    experimental results.

    (a) Leva (discussed in the two references in "Chemical Engineering")

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    26/54

    Page 26 of 54

    Leva gives the following equation for the mass velocity at the point at which

    fluidization begins:

    where: Dp = particle diameter, inches

    = fluid density, lbm/ft3

    s = particle density, lbm/ft3

    = fluid viscosity, centipoisesGmfV0M = mass velocity, lbm/ft2-hr

    The value of 688 was chosen by Leva as best based on 223 experimental points.

    Frantz noted that the standard deviation was 33% and the average deviation was 22%.

    The equation is valid for Reynolds numbers, GmfDp/, less than 5. Above 5, the valueof Gmfmust be multiplied by the correction factor, Fg, given in the following plot.

    (b) Perry's Chemical Engineering Handbook, 6th Edition, p. 20-59.

    Baeyens and Geldhart ["Fluidization and Its Applications," Proc. Int. Symp.

    Toulouse, 253 (1973)] gives "one of the better correlations:"

    where V0M = minimum fluidization velocity, m/s

    s = particle density, kg/m3

    = fluid density, kg/m3g = 9.81 m/s2

    DP = particle diameter, m

    = viscosity, kg/m,s

    (c) Equation of Geldhart in "Powder Technology."

    Using Equation (9).

    For each bed, calculate V0M from the equations of Leva and Perry's in m/s and ft/s.

    Compare the results with your experimental values.

    5. Finally investigate the behavior of your beds when they are expanded. At each data

    point in the expanded regime, you can calculate from Equation (7-60). ForM,assume that it has the value given to you by the TA for the packed bed. Then tabulate

    corresponding values of V0 on the abscissa. Note that taking the logarithm of both

    sides of Equation (7) gives:

    Hence the slope of each log-log plot will give n and the "intercept" should be ut. Whatvalues of ut do you find by this method?

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    27/54

    Page 27 of 54

    Now prepare a log-log plot of versus NRe,p . From this plot, Equation (16),

    and Equation (2), determine ut. Compare its value with that from the log-log plot of

    versus .

    6. Calculate the heat transfer coefficient and graph versus fluid velocity, the heat transfercoefficient and graph versus depth.

    7. Discuss your results critically.

    REFERENCES1. J.F. Richardson and W.N. Zaki, Trans. Inst. Chem. Engrs., 32, 35 (1954).

    2. J.M. Coulson and J.F. Richardson, "Chemical Engineering," Vol. II, p. 510-527,

    Pergamon Press, Oxford (1960).

    3. R.B. Bird, W.E. Stewart, and E.N. Lightfoot, "Transport Phenomena," p. 190-194,

    John Wiley and Sons, New York (1960).

    4. S. Ergun, Chem. Eng. Prog., 48, 89 (1952).

    5. W.L. McCabe and J.C. Smith, "Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering," 3rd

    Edition, p.146-150, 159-160, McGraw-Hill, New York (1976).

    6. A.S. Foust, L.A. Wenzel, C.W. Clump, L. Maus, and L.B. Anderson, "Principles of

    Unit Operations," 2nd edition, p. 637-547, 699-714, John Wiley and Sons, New York

    (1980).

    7. Kunii, D. and Levenspiel, O.: Fluidization Engineering, Butterworth-Heinemann,Boston, 1991

    8. McCabe, W.L., Smith, J.C., and Harriott, P: Unit Operations of Chemical

    Engineering, McGraw-Hill, 1985

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    28/54

    Page 28 of 54

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    29/54

    Page 29 of 54

    8. DRAG COEFFICIENT IN AIR FLOW

    Drag on a Circular Cylinder

    Aim:

    The aim of the experiment is to investigate the pressure distribution in an air flow

    around a cylinder in order to determine the drag forces and drag coefficient on thecylinder.

    Apparatus

    The apparatus consists of a small cylinder of 1/2 outside diameter mounted

    diametrically across a 8 diameter wind tunnel. The cylinder can be rotated 360 and

    a small hole in the center of the cylinder is provided for pressure tapping. The hole

    points directly into the air stream when the degree scale reads zero. The pressure

    differences between the cylinder and the tunnel wall are measured by 10 inclined

    manometer.

    The wind tunnel is driven by a turbo fan which its rotation can be varied, so its air

    velocity.

    Theory

    When a body is in a fluid stream, the fluid exerts a resultant force on the body. The

    components of the resultant force parallel and normal to the direction of the flow are

    called respectively drag and lift.

    Figure E?.1

    The flow pattern around a cylinder in a fluid stream is illustrated in Figure E?.1 for

    NRe > 20. The flow separates at points S, about 80 to the front stagnation point.

    Vortices are formed in the behind of the cylinder (in the wake region). The drag on

    the cylinder results partly from the skin friction and partly from the fact that the

    pressure on the rear side is lower than on the front.

    The drag resulting from the pressure differences around the surfaces of an object is

    called the form drag.

    This experiment trying to investigate and calculate the form drag of a cylinder object

    by measuring the pressure distribution around the surfaces of a cylinder.

    s

    s

    Wide eddywake

    d

    P

    d

    Figure E?.2Flow

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    30/54

    Page 30 of 54

    If the flow is symmetrical and by resolving the force exerted by the pressure in the

    direction of the approaching flow, the form drag FD per unit length of cylinder is

    given by

    0 0

    cos2.cos2 dPdd

    d

    PFD

    Where Pis the pressure around the surface of the cylinder and a function of.

    During the experiment, the manometer does not read the Pvalues, but the differences

    between Pand Pstatic at the tunnel wall. Therefore the expression forFD becomes

    0

    cos dPPdFD s

    where Ps is the static force at the wall tunnel and taken as constant.

    The drag coefficient for a body in a fluid is defined as:

    )(221 areaV

    dragtotalCD

    Where 221 V is the dynamic pressure of the fluid stream, and the area is the projected

    area of the body in the direction of the approaching stream. For a circular cylinder,

    dV

    DCD 2

    21

    For a form drag of the cylinder, the form drag coefficient can be calculated using the

    following relation

    0

    2

    21 cos dV

    PPC sD

    Applying the Bernoullis theorem between the point at the wall and the 0 point at the

    cylinder gives

    sPPV 02

    21

    Finally, the form drag coefficient can be written as

    0 0

    cos dPP

    PPC

    s

    sD

    Experimental Procedure1. Before starting the flow in the tunnel, connects the pressure tap on the left side of the

    manometer to the pressure tap of the cylinder and the other side to the pressure tap on

    the tunnel wall. Make sure that all connections are tight!

    2. Adjust the scale of the manometer to get the zero reading of the scale match with the

    meniscus.

    3. Run the turbofan at predetermined RPM, and wait for a while to attain stable air

    flow.4. Rotate the cylinder to the zero position and read the manometer reading. Now, rotate

    clockwise in 10 intervals from 0 until 360 and note the manometer readings at

    each interval stops.5. Plot the pressure reading vs. the degree of rotation ().

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    31/54

    Page 31 of 54

    6. Measure the temperature of the air leaving the wind tunnel and hence look up for the

    kinematics viscosity value of the air.

    Analysis: Data

    1. Identify the separation point on your plot of(P Ps) vs. . In the front part of thecylinder, the pressure falls rapidly as the fluid accelerates. After the separation point a

    wake is formed and the pressure is more or less constant.

    2. Find the form drag coefficient by considering the area between the curve and the axis,

    taking account of the sign and do not forget to convert degrees to radians. Discuss how

    you obtained the error estimate for coefficient.

    3. Calculate the Reynolds number. The contribution of skin friction to the total drag

    coefficient can be estimated from the correlation5.0

    Re4fC

    Compare the values of the form and skin friction drag coefficient with one another and

    compare the total drag coefficients with the values in the textbooks.4. Comment on the accuracy of the experiment.

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    32/54

    Page 32 of 54

    9. NATURAL CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER

    Natural Convection Experiment

    Todemonstratethebasicprinciplesofnaturalconvectionheattransferincluding

    determinationoftheconvectiveheattransfercoefficient.

    Naturalconvectionoccurswhentemperaturegradientwithinafluidinducesitsmotion.Ingeneralthedensityofafluiddecreaseswithincreasingtemperatureandtherefore creatingapressuregradienttowardcoolerpartofthefluid.Thispressuregradientistheresponsiblecause forthefluidmotion.Thehotterfluidmovesupwardandthecoolerfluidmovesdownward.Asthefluidmovesthedragforceson the fluidwillbalancethepressuregradientandsolimitingthefluidvelocity.

    Tosustainthe natural motion,heatmustbetransferredtothefluidcontinuously.AccordingtoNewtons LawofCooling,therateofheattransfer couldbeexpressedas

    )( fs TThq

    Where h=heattransfercoefficient, Ts=hotsurfacetemperature,and Tf=coldfluidtemperaturefarawayfromthesurface.Tomaketheexpressionusable, hshouldknownorcanbepredictedeasily.Sinceanalyticalapproachofpredicting hisdifficult,anexperimentalapproach(orempirical)isoftenchosenthroughtheuseofdynamicsimilarity.Itisfoundthatcertainsystemsinfluidmechanicsorheattransferarefoundtohavesimilarbehaviorseventhoughthephysicalsituationsmaybequitedifferent.Inconvectiveheattransferwemayapplydynamicsscalingtomakeatransformation.

    IthasbeendefinedadimensionlessconvectiveheattransfercoefficientcalledtheNusseltnumberas

    k

    LhNu c (1)

    wherehc:convectiveheattransfercoefficient

    L:characteristiclengthk:thermalconductivityofthefluid.

    L1

    L2

    L3

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    33/54

    Page 33 of 54

    Thecharacteristiclengthischosenasthesystemlengththatmostaffectsthefluidflow.Forflow inapipethecharacteristiclengthisthe pipediameter, D,and theexpressionbecomes

    k

    DhNu c (2)

    TheRayleighnumberisindicativeofthebuoyancyforcethatisdrivingtheflowandisgivenby

    3)( LTTgRa

    fs (3)

    whereg:accelerationduetogravity:fluidthermalexpansioncoefficientTs:surfacetemperature

    Tf:fluidtemperature

    L:characteristiclength:fluidkinematicviscosity:fluidthermaldiffusivity.

    ThedimensionlessparameterwhichisusedtorepresenttheaffectoffluidpropertiesisthePrandtlnumber

    Pr (5)

    Theinfluenceofgeometrymaybeseeninacoupleofways.First,forthoseconfigurationsthathavetwolengthdimensions,suchasacylinder, weintroducea

    dimensionlessgeometricparameter(6)

    ThesecondwayinwhichweseegeometricalinfluencesisthroughthefunctionalformoftheNusseltnumbercorrelation.Ingeneralwemaywrite

    (7)

    Forsimplesituationsthesemayoftenbewrittenaspowerlawrelationships

    (8)

    wheretheconstants a,m,and nwillchangefordifferentgeometries.

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    34/54

    Page 34 of 54

    10. NATURAL AND FORCED CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER

    TThhiiss eexxppeerriimmeenntt iiss ddeessiiggnneedd ttoo iilllluussttrraattee tthhee NNeewwttoonnss llaaww ooff ccoooolliinngg bbyy ccoonnvveeccttiioonn aannddttoo uunnddeerrssttaanndd hhooww tthhee hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr ccooeeffffiicciieenntt iiss oobbttaaiinneedd eexxppeerriimmeennttaallllyy.. NNaattuurraall aanndd

    ffoorrcceedd ccoonnvveeccttiioonn oovveerr aa hheeaatteedd ccyylliinnddeerr iiss aannaallyyzzeedd aanndd eexxppeerriimmeennttaall rreessuullttss aarree

    ccoommppaarreedd wwiitthh ssttaannddaarrdd ccoorrrreellaattiioonnss..

    DDeetteerrmmiinnee tthhee hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr ccooeeffffiicciieenntt ffoorr aa ffllooww aarroouunndd aa ccyylliinnddeerr uunnddeerr ffrreeee aanndd

    ffoo

    rrcc

    ee

    dd

    cc

    oo

    nn

    vv

    ee

    cc

    ttiioo

    nn

    .

    .UU

    nn

    dd

    ee

    rrss

    ttaa

    nn

    dd

    tthh

    ee

    cc

    oo

    rrrree

    llaa

    ttiioo

    nn

    bb

    ee

    ttww

    ee

    ee

    nn

    NN

    uu

    ,,

    RR

    ee

    yy

    nn

    oo

    lldd

    ss

    aa

    nn

    dd

    RR

    aa

    yy

    llee

    iigg

    hh

    nnuummbbeerrss.. CCoommppaarree wwiitthh ssttaannddaarrdd ccoorrrreellaattiioonn ffrroomm tteexxttbbooookkss oonn hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr.. TThhee eeffffeecctt

    ooff tthheerrmmaall rraaddiiaattiioonn iiss aallssoo iinncclluuddeedd..

    FFoorr ccoonnvveeccttiivvee hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr,, tthhee rraattee eeqquuaattiioonn iiss kknnoowwnn aass NNeewwttoonnss llaaww ooff ccoooolliinngg aanndd

    iiss eexxpprreesssseedd aass::

    )( TThq s

    WWhheerree TTss iiss tthhee ssuurrffaaccee tteemmppeerraattuurree,, TT tthhee fflluuiidd tteemmppeerraattuurree,, hh tthhee ccoonnvveeccttiioonn hheeaatt

    ttrraannssffeerr ccooeeffffiicciieenntt aannddq

    tthhee ccoonnvveeccttiivvee hheeaatt fflluuxx.. TThhee hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr ccooeeffffiicciieenntt hh iiss aa

    ffuunnccttiioonn ooff tthhee fflluuiidd ffllooww,, ssoo,, iitt iiss iinnfflluueenncceedd bbyy tthhee ssuurrffaaccee ggeeoommeettrryy,, tthhee fflluuiidd mmoottiioonn iinn

    tthhee bboouunnddaarryy llaayyeerr aanndd tthhee fflluuiidd pprrooppeerrttiieess aass wweellll..

    FFrroomm tthhee nnoorrmmaalliizzeedd mmoommeennttuumm aanndd eenneerrggyy eeqquuaattiioonn iinn tthhee bboouunnddaarryy llaayyeerr::

    2*

    *2

    *

    *

    *

    **

    *

    **

    Re

    1

    y

    U

    x

    P

    y

    UV

    x

    UU

    L

    MMoommeennttuumm eeqquuaattiioonn

    2*

    *2

    *

    **

    *

    **

    PrRe

    1

    y

    T

    y

    TV

    x

    TU

    L

    EEnneerrggyy eeqquuaattiioonn

    IInnddeeppeennddeennttllyy ooff tthhee ssoolluuttiioonn ooff tthheessee eeqquuaattiioonnss ffoorr aa ppaarrttiiccuullaarr ccaassee,, tthhee ffuunnccttiioonnaall

    ffoorrmm ffoorr UU**

    aanndd TT**

    ccaann bbee wwrriitttteenn aass::

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    35/54

    Page 35 of 54

    UU**

    == ff((xx**,,yy

    **,,RReeLL,, ddpp

    **//ddxx

    **))

    aanndd

    TT**

    == ff((xx**,,yy

    **,,RReeLL,, PPrr,, ddpp

    **//ddxx

    **))

    HHeeaatt ttrraannssffeerr,, dduuee ttoo tthhee nnoo--sslliipp ccoonnddiittiioonn aatt tthhee wwaallll ssuurrffaaccee ooff tthhee bboouunnddaarryy llaayyeerr,,

    ooccccuurrss bbyy ccoonndduuccttiioonn;;

    0y

    f

    "

    sy

    Tkq

    BByy ccoommbbiinniinngg wwiitthh tthhee NNeewwttoonnss llaaww ooff ccoooolliinngg,, wwee oobbttaaiinn::

    TT

    y

    Tk

    hs

    0y

    f

    SSiinnccee TT**

    wwaass ddeeffiinneedd aasss

    s*

    TT

    TTT

    hhccaann bbee wwrriitttteenn iinn tteerrmmss ooff tthhee ddiimmeennssiioonnlleessss tteemmppeerraattuurree pprrooffiillee TT**

    0

    *

    *

    0

    *

    *

    **)(

    )(

    y

    f

    ys

    sf

    y

    T

    L

    k

    y

    T

    TTL

    TTkh

    TThhiiss eexxpprreessssiioonn ssuuggggeessttss ddeeffiinniinngg aa ddiimmeennssiioonnlleessss ppaarraammeetteerr;;

    0y

    *

    *

    f *y

    T

    k

    hLNu

    FFrroomm tthhee ddiimmeennssiioonnlleessss tteemmppeerraattuurree pprrooffiilleess,, wwee ccaann iimmppllyy aa ffuunnccttiioonnaall ffoorrmm ffoorr tthheeNNuusssseelltt nnuummbbeerr,,

    NNuu == ff((xx**,,RReeLL

    **,,PPrr,,ddpp

    **//ddxx

    **))

    TToo ccaallccuullaattee aann aavveerraaggee hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr ccooeeffffiicciieenntt,, wwee hhaavvee ttoo iinntteeggrraattee oovveerr xx**,, ssoo tthhee

    aavveerraaggee NNuusssseelltt nnuummbbeerr bbeeccoommeess iinnddeeppeennddeenntt ooff xx**.. FFoorr aa pprreessccrriibbeedd ggeeoommeettrryy,, *

    *

    dx

    dpiiss

    ss

    pp

    ee

    cc

    iiffiiee

    dd

    aa

    nn

    dd

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    36/54

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    37/54

    Page 37 of 54

    EEffffeeccttiivvee aaiirr vveelloocciittyy llooccaall ttoo ccyylliinnddeerr dduuee ttoo bblloocckkaaggee eeffffeecctt UUee == ((11..2222)) ((UUaa ))

    PPhhyyssiiccaall PPrrooppeerrttiieess ooff AAiirr aatt AAttmmoosspphheerriicc PPrreessssuurree

    TT VV kk PPrr

    KK mm22//ss WW//mmKK --

    330000 11..556688EE--55 00..0022662244 00..770088

    335500 22..007766EE--55 00..0033000033 00..669977

    440000 22..559900EE--55 00..0033336655 00..668899

    445500 22..888866EE--55 00..0033770077 00..668833

    550000 33..779900EE--55 00..0044003388 00..6688

    555500 44..443344EE--55 00..0044336600 00..6688

    660000 55..113344EE--55 00..0044665599 00..6688

    WWhheerree::

    TT iiss tthhee aabbssoolluuttee tteemmppeerraattuurree,, VV iiss tthhee DDyynnaammiicc vviissccoossiittyy ooff aaiirr,, kk iiss tthhee tthheerrmmaall

    ccoonndduuccttiivviittyy aanndd PPrr iiss tthhee PPrraannddttll nnuummbbeerr..

    CCoonnnneecctt iinnssttrruummeennttss ttoo tthhee hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr uunniitt

    CCoommbbiinneedd CCoonnvveeccttiioonn aanndd RRaaddiiaattiioonn HHeeaattTTrraannssffeerr EEqquuiippmmeenntt

    SScchheemmaattiicc DDiiaaggrraamm sshhoowwiinngg tthhee CCoommbbiinneeddCCoonnvveeccttiioonn aanndd RRaaddiiaattiioonn HHeeaatt TTrraannssffeerr

    EE uuii mmeenntt

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    38/54

    Page 38 of 54

    MMeeaassuurree tthhee rreeaaddiinngg ffoorr tthhee ssuurrffaaccee tteemmppeerraattuurree ooff tthhee ccyylliinnddeerr,, tthhee tteemmppeerraattuurree

    aanndd vveelloocciittyy ooff tthhee aaiirr ffllooww aanndd tthhee ppoowweerr ssuupppplliieedd bbyy tthhee hheeaatteerr..

    RReeppeeaatt sstteeppss 11 aanndd 22 ffoorr ddiiffffeerreenntt vveelloocciittiieess tthhee aaiirr ffllooww aanndd ppoowweerr iinnppuutt..

    QQiinnppuutt hhrr hhCC11tthh hhCC22tthhSSeett

    WW WW//mm22KK WW//mm

    22KK WW//mm

    22KK

    11 44

    22 88

    33 1122

    44 1166

    TThhee ttoottaall hheeaatt iinnppuutt iiss:: QQiinnppuutt == VVII

    TThhee hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr rraattee bbyy rraaddiiaattiioonn iiss::

    QQrraadd == AA ((TTss44 TTaa

    44)) == hhrr AA ((TTss TTaa))

    SSoo,,as

    asr

    TT

    TTh

    )( 44

    TThhee hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr rraattee bbyy ccoonnvveeccttiioonn iiss::

    QQccoonnvv == QQiinnppuutt -- QQrraadd

    FFrroomm NNeewwttoonnss llaaww ooff ccoooolliinngg

    )( ascconv TTAhQ

    AAnndd

    )( as

    convc

    TTA

    Qh

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    39/54

    Page 39 of 54

    FFoorr aann iissootthheerrmmaall lloonngg hhoorriizzoonnttaall ccyylliinnddeerr,, MMoorrggaann ssuuggggeessttss aa ccoorrrreellaattiioonn ooff tthhee ffoorrmm,,

    nDD cRak

    DhNu ((11))

    cc aanndd nn aarree ccooeeffffiicciieennttss tthhaatt ddeeppeenndd oonn tthhee RRaayylleeiigghh nnuummbbeerr

    RRaayylleeiigghh nnuummbbeerr cc nn

    1100--1100

    1100--22

    00..667755 00..005588

    1100--22

    110022

    11..0022 00..114488

    110022

    110044

    00..885500 00..118888

    110044

    110077

    00..448800 00..225500

    110077

    11001122

    00..112255 00..333333

    TThhee RRaayylleeiigghh nnuummbbeerr iiss ccaallccuullaatteedd ffrroomm,,

    PrD)TT(g

    Ra2

    3

    as

    wwhheerreefilmT

    1 aanndd

    2

    TTT asfilm

    CChhuurrcchhiillll aanndd CChhuu rreeccoommmmeenndd aa ssiinnggllee ccoorrrreellaattiioonn ffoorr aa wwiiddee rraannggee ooff RRaayylleeiigghh nnuummbbeerr,,

    2

    27/816/9

    6/1

    D

    Pr)/559.0(1

    Ra387.060.0Nu

    1210Ra ((22))

    FFrroomm ccoorrrreellaattiioonn ((11)) aanndd ((22)) wwee ccaann ddeetteerrmmiinnee hhCC11tthh aanndd hhCC22tthh aanndd ccoommppaarree wwiitthh hhcc

    oobbttaaiinneedd ffrroomm tthhee eexxppeerriimmeenntt..

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    40/54

    Page 40 of 54

    QQiinnppuutt hhrr hhCC RRee NNuu11 NNuu22 hhCC11tthh hhCC22tthhSSeett

    WW WW//mm22

    KK WW//mm22

    KK -- -- -- -- --

    11

    22

    33

    44

    55

    66

    77

    TThhee ttoottaall hheeaatt iinnppuutt iiss::

    QQiinnppuutt == VVII

    TThhee hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr rraattee bbyy rraaddiiaattiioonn iiss::

    QQrraadd == AA ((TTss44 TTaa

    44)) == hhrr AA ((TTss TTaa))

    SS

    oo

    ,,

    as

    asr

    TT

    TTh

    )( 44

    TThhee hheeaatt ttrraannssffeerr rraattee bbyy ccoonnvveeccttiioonn iiss::

    QQccoonnvv == QQiinnppuutt -- QQrraadd

    FFrroomm NNeewwttoonnss llaaww ooff ccoooolliinngg

    )( ascconv TTAhQ

    aanndd

    )TT(A

    Qh

    as

    convc

    FFoorr aann iissootthheerrmmaall lloonngg hhoorriizzoonnttaall ccyylliinnddeerr,, HHiillppeerr ssuuggggeessttss,,

    3/1m

    DD PrReC

    k

    DhNu ((33))

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    41/54

    Page 41 of 54

    wwhheerree CC aanndd mm aarree ccooeeffffiicciieenntt tthhaatt ddeeppeenndd oonn tthhee RReeyynnoollddss nnuummbbeerr::

    RReeDD CC mm

    00..44--44 00..998899 00..333300

    44--4400 00..991111 00..3388554400--44000000 00..668833 00..446666

    44000000--440000000000 00..119933 00..661188

    4400000000--440000000000 00..002277 00..880055

    AAllll pprrooppeerrttiieess aarree eevvaalluuaatteedd aatt tthhee ffiillmm tteemmppeerraattuurree

    2

    TTT asfilm

    CChhuurrcchhiillll aanndd BBeerrnnsstteeiinn pprrooppoosseedd tthhee ffoolllloowwiinngg ccoorrrreellaattiioonn ffoorr RRee PPrr>>00..22

    5/48/5

    D

    4/13/2

    3/12/1

    D282000

    Re1

    Pr

    4.01

    PrRe62.03.0Nu

    ((44))

    wwhheerree aallll pprrooppeerrttiieess aarree eevvaalluuaatteedd aatt tthhee ffiillmm tteemmppeerraattuurree..

    FFrroomm ccoorrrreellaattiioonn ((33)) aanndd ((44)) wwee ccaann ddeetteerrmmiinnee hhCC11tthh aanndd hhCC22tthh aanndd ccoommppaarree wwiitthh hhcc

    oobbttaaiinneedd ffrroomm tthhee eexxppeerriimmeenntt..

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    42/54

    Page 42 of 54

    10. DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER

    OBJECTIVES

    The objective of this experiment is to investigate the effect of Reynolds number on the

    individual heat transfer coefficients and the performances of co-current and counter-current

    flow heat transfer in a double pipe heat exchanger.

    INTRODUCTION

    Double pipe heat exchanger consists of outer tube and inner tube. Fluids flow through inner

    tube and annulus.

    The amount of heat transferred in the hot stream and in the cold stream are

    Applying overall energy balance at steady state and rearranging gives

    RATE OF HEAT TRANSFER

    HEAT FLUX: The rate of heat transfer per unit area is called the heat flux. In a heat-transfer

    equipment which the transfer surfaces are constructed from tubes or pipe, heat fluxes may

    then be based on either the inside area or the outside area of the tubes. Although the choice is

    arbitrary, it must be clearly stated, because the numerical magnitude of the heat fluxes will

    not be the same for both.

    OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT: The heat flux depends on the localtemperatures different between the hot side and the cold side and the local heat transfer

    coefficient. In practise, it is easier to work with the average of all the local temperature

    differents and the local heat transfer coefficient. The heat trasfer rate from the hot stream to

    the cold stream can then be written as

    where

    ThcThh

    Tcc

    Tch

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    43/54

    Page 43 of 54

    The LMTD is not always the correct mean temperature difference to use. It should not be

    used when U changes appreciably or when T is not a linear function of q. As an example,consider an exchanger used to cool and condense a superheated vapor.

    INDIVIDUAL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT: Overall heat transfer coefficient consists

    of many parts. Graphically it can be shown as

    The rate of heat transfer based on the outside area and the individual heat transfer coefficient

    can be calculated from the following realtion.

    And for the inside area

    PRELIMINARY WORK

    Study the equipment and familiarize yourself with its operation. Draw a detailed diagram of

    the equipment.

    The data about the dimensions of the exchanger are as follows:

    Number of double pipes: ?

    Length of each pipe: ? m

    Inner pipe dimensions: ? Sch. 40 steel pipe

    Outer pipe dimensions: ? Sch. 40 steel pipe

    Prepare a data sheet to record the data acquired during the experiment.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

    1. Perform at least four separate runs for each of the co-current and counter-current flow

    configurations. During the runs vary the flow rate of the cold stream in the turbulentregion and keep the flow rates hot stream constant.

    Thot

    Tcold

    hot fluidcold fluid

    metal wall

    TwcTwh

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    44/54

    Page 44 of 54

    2. Take readings for both rotameter during each run at suitable time intervals. Record the

    mass flowrates for the streams.

    3. Wait for the attainment of steady state conditions during each runtime after changing the

    flow rate of the cold stream. Check the steady-state conditions by recording the streams

    temperatures at suitable time intervals.

    CALCULATIONS

    1. Plot the temperature of each stream vs. the length of the heat exchanger for each run.

    Indicate the ranges and approaches.

    2. Calculate the overall heat transfer coefficients based on the cold water stream. Plot the

    overall heat transfer coefficients of cold stream vs. corresponding Reynolds numbers.

    3. Calculate the overall heat transfer coefficients based on the hot water stream. Plot the

    overall heat transfer coefficients of hot stream vs. corresponding Reynolds numbers.

    4. Calculate the heat fluxes to cold stream once using the overall heat transfer coefficientsand log-mean temperature differences; and once using the flow rate and temperature data

    of the cold stream.

    5. Determine the heat fluxes to the surroundings by difference in heat fluxes obtained using

    the data for cold and hot streams. Calculate the percentage of heat loss to surroundings.

    6. Make an energy balance.

    DISCUSSIONS

    1. The effect of Reynolds number on the individual heat transfer coefficients.

    2. Performance of the co-current flow heat exchanger vs. the counter-current flow heat

    exchanger.

    3. Possible causes of deviations, if any, between the results of heat fluxes obtained by the

    two different calculation procedures, for the same run.

    4. Make recommendations to increase the heat transfer rate to the cold stream, and for the

    better control of variables to obtain more accurate experiment results.

    5. Explain how you can calculate the heat transfer coefficient on the annular side of the

    inner pipe in double pipe heat exchanger.

    6. Under which conditions would you recommend to have hot fluid flowing in the inner pipe

    of a double pipe heat exchanger.

    7. Where and when do you use double pipe heat exchangers? What is the most reasonable

    advantage of a double pipe exchanger when compared with shell-and-tube exchangers?

    8. Explain, with respect to the fluids involved, the following terms used in the heat transfer

    terminology: Exchanger, heater (or steam heater); cooler; condenser; reboiler; vaporizer;

    waste-heat Boiler.

    9. What is the main difference between a 1-2 shell-and-tube exchanger and a U-tube

    exchanger?

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    45/54

    Page 45 of 54

    Suggested Reading

    1. Mc Cabe, W.L., J.C. Smith, and P. Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering,

    6th ed., Mc Graw Hill, N.Y. (2001) Chapter 11, Principles of Heat Flow in Fluids.

    2. Holman, J.P., Heat Transfer, 7th ed., Mc Graw Hill, N.Y. (1990).

    3. Perry, R.H. and D. Green, Perrys Chemical Engineers Handbook, 7th ed., Mc Graw

    Hill, N.Y. (1997) Section 10, Heat Transmission.

    4. Foust, A.S., et al, Principles of Unit Operations, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, N.Y.

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    46/54

    Page 46 of 54

    11. SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER

    OBJECTIVE of this experiment is to measure the two inlet temperatures and the mass flows

    through the shell and tubes, in order to predict the two outlet temperatures using the NTU method

    andcomparethesepredictedvalueswithactualmeasuredoutlettemperatures.

    INTRODUCTIONMany engineering applications involve a process of heat exchange between

    two fluids. Heat exchangers are devices used to promote the heat transferred between two fluids;

    e.g., a car radiator and the condenser units on air conditioning systems. Space heating, air

    conditioning, power production, and chemical processing are typical areas of application.

    There are many heat exchanger designs. The laboratory setup for this experiment contains three

    heat exchanger types: a shell-and-tube exchanger, a concentric tube exchanger, and a tube bank

    exchanger in cross flow. This particular experiment employs the shell-and-tube type heat exchanger

    (see Figure 1). A shell-and-tube heat exchanger is constructed of tubes that are attached on each

    end by a plate, called the tube sheet, through which the tubes pass. One fluid streams into the inlet

    of the heat exchanger, flows through the tubes, and exits through the tube sheet at the opposite end

    of the heat exchanger.

    Figure 1Schematic of shell-and-tube exchanger

    A shell encloses the internal volume where the tubes are housed. Another, fluid flows through

    the shell and heat is exchanged between the tube-side fluid and the shell-side fluid. In a powerplant, most heat exchangers are of the shell-and-tube design. The number of passes commonly

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    47/54Page 47 of 54

    presents a further description of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger. A single pass means the fluid

    flows straight through the entire heat exchanger without changing direction and so, in this design,

    the fluid moves past the length of the heat exchanger only a single time. In a two-pass heat

    exchanger the fluid in the tubes goes in one end, flows to the other end, reverses direction then

    flows back to the same end that the fluid entered through a second set of tubes. Thus, the fluid

    travels the full length of the heat exchanger twice. Similarly, multiple pass heat exchangers are so

    named because they make many passes. This experiment employs a shell-and-tube heat exchangerconsisting of two tube passes and one shell pass.

    THEORY: HEAT EXCHANGER ANALYSIS

    Thermodynamics and the First Law dictate the overall energy transfer in a heat exchanger. There

    are two widely used methods of heat exchanger analysis, the NTU-Effectiveness method and the

    Log-Mean-Temperature-Difference (LMTD) method. These are briefly discussed below.

    Log-Mean-Temperature-Difference (LMTD) Method

    For a heat exchanger between two fluids with given inlet and outlet temperatures, there are three

    equations for the rate of heat transfer, Q,

    (11)

    (12)

    (13)

    Where

    and . These temperature differences are called

    temperature approaches, .

    U= overall heat transfer coefficient, W/(m2

    K)A = area of surface across heat transfer occurs, m2

    = mass flow rate of fluid j, kg/s

    = specific heat of fluid j, J/(kgK)

    For known specific heats, U, A, and entering temperatures, the three equations above can be solved

    for three unknownsT1,out, T2,out, and Qby successive substitution of one of the equations forQ

    onto another. It is a simple matter to use the log-mean-temperature-difference method of heat

    exchanger analysis when the fluid inlet temperatures are known and the outlet temperatures are

    specified or readily determined from the energy balance expressions. The value ofTlmtdfor theexchanger may then be determined. However, ifonly the inlet temperatures are known, use of the

    LMTD method requires an iterative procedure.

    T1,in T1,out

    T2,in

    T2,out

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    48/54Page 48 of 54

    NTU-Effectiveness MethodThis method was developed to avoid the iterative calculation of LMTD method when only

    the temperatures of inlet streams are known. Number of (heat) transfer unit is defined as

    (14)

    where

    (15)

    (16)

    (17)

    (18)

    NTU is a function of geometric and material properties, and the mass flow rates. It does not include

    any fluid temperatures.

    Heat exchanger effectiveness is defined as the ratio of the actual heat that can be transferred by the

    equipment and the maximum heat that possibly can be given or be received by the least stream

    capacity (Cmin) at infinite area.

    (19)

    Effectiveness of heat exchanger equipment depends on many factors such as type, geometric

    arrangement, etc. The following table presents the effectiveness of various cases.

    The outlet temperatures can be easily calculated from Qactualand equation (1) and (2).

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    49/54Page 49 of 54

    LABORATORY PROCEDURE1. Verify the dimensions and features of Figure 2.

    2. Generally, small flow rates will generate better results but may take longer to reach steady

    state. Also, do not let the air that comes out of entrainment accumulate in shell. Use bleed

    taps as needed.3. For a hot water flow of about 15% of the maximum reading and a cold water flow of about

    30%, take inlet and outlet temperatures of both flows until no further changes in

    temperature are noted. This is the steady-state conditionuse only the associated flow

    rates and temperatures for calculations.

    Figure 2Experimental apparatus with dimensional data

    DETAILED COMPUTATIONAL PROCEDURE

    The NTU method will be described for a shell-and-tube heat exchange using only one tube; but

    it could represent an entire tube bundle.

    1. a. Determine cold and hot water flow rates, _mH_mH and _mC_mC , and their specific

    heats,Hp

    c andCp

    c (look for average cp values). [ALWAYS CHECK UNITS!!]

    b. Calculate a temperature specific energy flow known as the heat capacity rate, C, for both thecold and hot flows

    Distance between Tube Sheets, 16-1/8

    (inside face to inside face)

    30 Tubes, each 0.25 diameterneglect wall thickness

    Cold waterinlet

    thermometer

    Hot water inlet thermometer

    Cold wateroutlet

    thermometer

    Hot water

    outletthermometer

    Shell: 5 OD4.5 ID

    5 Baffles, 1.2 thick. Equally spaced to form 6

    chamber. 23 tube penetrations per baffle.

    The width of theflow coursevaries & thus theaverage velocity

    SL = 0.475

    ST= 0.548

    SD = 0.548SL

    ST

    SD

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    50/54Page 50 of 54

    smallertheand

    istheseoflargerThe

    min

    max

    C

    C

    cmC

    cmC

    hot

    cold

    phothot

    pcoldcold

    .

    c. Calculate the heat capacity rate ratio, c = Cmin/Cmax.

    2. Calculate the heat transfer coefficients at the inside and outside surfaces of the tubes, hinside and

    houtside. These are used to compute the overall heat transfer coefficient, U. (See Figure 3)

    Figure3Heattransfercoefficientsatinsideandoutsidetubesurfaces

    a. Flow Inside Tubes: Even though there are many tubes in the bundle and there are parallel

    and counter flows in this two-pass exchanger, the calculation may be performed by

    considering the flow in just one of the tubes, but one must account for the direction of the

    flow. That is, half of the tubes are associated with parallel flow and half the tubes areassociated with counterflow. Thus, the mass flow in the equivalent tubes is

    tubeinside

    flowsidetubetotalm

    N

    m1

    -

    2

    where, N= total number of tubes.

    From simple flow relations, it is known that the velocity inside a single tube is

    A

    mV insideinside

    where, A = cross sectional area of one tube.

    Given this velocity, a Reynolds number ( ) can be computed to indicatewhether the inside flow is laminar or turbulent. This will most likely be fully-developed,

    laminar flow. For such with constant surface temperature, Ts, and :

    where fluid properties are based on the mean (or bulk) temperature, .

    If the flow is fully developed turbulent (Re 10,000),

    .

    Tube-side fluid properties should be evaluated at the average of the mean temperatures, .

    b. Shell Flow (Outside of Tubes): For the staggered tube arrangement of the experiment

    shown in Figure 4, use the following expression for the average Nusselt number

    outsideh

    insideh

  • 8/3/2019 Chemical Engineering Laboratory i(1)

    51/54Page 51 of 54

    Use Table 1 to determine m and C1. Note in the report which values ofm and C1 were

    used. This relation applies when there are more than 10 tubes in a bundle (NL 10), 2000