Chapter 22 Seascape Landscape Visual Impact compressed (1) · SNH Scottish Natural Heritage ZTV Zone of Theoretical Visibility . Project related 31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022

REPORT

Millport Coastal Flood Protection

Scheme: Environmental Statement

Chapter 22 Seascape, Landscape and Visual Impact

Assessment

Client: North Ayrshire Council

Reference: PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022

Status: Final/P01.01

Date: 31 January 2020

P r o j e c t r e l a t e d

31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022

i

HASKONINGDHV UK LTD.

74/2 Commercial Quay

Commercial Street

Leith

Edinburgh

EH6 6LX

Industry & Buildings

VAT registration number: 792428892

+44 131 5550506

[email protected]

royalhaskoningdhv.com

T

E

W

Document title: Millport Coastal Flood Protection Scheme: Environmental Statement

Document short title:

Reference: PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022

Status: P01.01/Final

Date: 31 January 2020

Project name: Millport Coastal Flood Protection Scheme

Project number: PB4749

Author(s): David Stokoe

Drafted by: David Stokoe

Checked by: Amy Savage

Date / initials: 23/01/2020

Approved by: Amy Savage

Date / initials: 23/01/2020

Classification

Project related

Disclaimer

No part of these specifications/printed matter may be reproduced and/or published by print, photocopy, microfilm or by

any other means, without the prior written permission of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.; nor may they be used, without such

permission, for any purposes other than that for which they were produced. HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. accepts no

responsibility or liability for these specifications/printed matter to any party other than the persons by whom it was

commissioned and as concluded under that Appointment. The integrated QHSE management system of

HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. has been certified in accordance with ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015 and ISO 45001:2018.



ii

Table of Contents

22 Seascape, Landscape and Visual Impact 1

22.1 Introduction 1

22.2 Policy, Legislation and Guidance 1

22.3 Consultation 8

22.4 Methodology 11

22.5 Existing Environment 21

22.6 Impact Assessment 28

22.7 Summary of Effects 54

22.8 Conclusions 57

22.9 References 58

Table of Tables

Table 22-1 Summary of key international legislation and policy relevant to this proposed scheme

2

Table 22-2 Summary of key national legislation and policy relevant to this proposed scheme 2

Table 22-3 Relevant local planning policies 5

Table 22-4 Consultation responses 8

Table 22-5 Landscape / Seascape Sensitivity and Magnitude 13

Table 22-6 Visual Receptor Sensitivity and Magnitude 17

Table 22-7 Evaluation of Landscape and Visual Effects 18

Table 22-8 Viewpoint Locations 19

Table 22-9 Key Seascape / Landscape and Visual Characteristics 25

Table 22-10 Consideration of Design Opportunities 28

Table 22-11 Construction Effects (Landscape) of the Proposed Onshore Flood Protection Works

31

Table 22-12 Consideration of proposed scheme against key characteristics of the Millport CCA.

36

Table 22-13 Construction Effects (Visual) of the Proposed scheme 38

Table 22-14 Viewpoint Analysis – Millburn Street 39

Table 22-15 Viewpoint Analysis – Crichton Street 40

Table 22-16 Viewpoint Analysis – Clyde Street 41

Table 22-17 Viewpoint Analysis – Millport Pier 42

Table 22-18 Viewpoint Analysis – Stuart Street 43



iii

Table 22-19 Viewpoint Analysis – Guildford Street 44

Table 22-20 Viewpoint Analysis – Glasgow Street 45

Table 22-21 Viewpoint Analysis – Kelburn Street 46

Table 22-22 Viewpoint Analysis – Farland Hill 47

Table 22-23 Visual Effects on Views from Recreational Routes 50

Table 22-24 Visual Effects on Recreational and Tourist Destinations 52

Table 22-25 Visual Effects on Views from Ferry / Sailing Routes 53

Table 22-26 Summary of seascape, landscape and visual effects 54

Table of Figures

Figure 22-1 Seascape, Landscape and Visual Study Area (2km)

Figure 22-2 Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) to 2km with Viewpoints

Figure 22-3 Landscape and Seascape Character (2km)

Figure 22-4 Landscape Planning Designations (2km)

Figure 22-5 Recreational Routes and Key Tourist Destinations (2km)

Figure 22-6 Viewpoint 1 Milburn Street

Figure 22-7 Viewpoint 2 Chricton Street

Figure 22-8 Viewpoint 3 Clyde Street

Figure 22-9 Viewpoint 4 Millport Pier

Figure 22-10 Viewpoint 5 Stuart Street

Figure 22-11 Viewpoint 6 Guildford Street

Figure 22-12 Viewpoint 7 Glasgow Street

Figure 22-13 Viewpoint 8 Kelburn Street

Figure 22-14 Viewpoint 9 Farland Hill

Appendices

Appendix 22.1 Landscape Design and Access Statement.



iv

Acronyms

Acronym Acronym description

AOD Above Ordnance Datum

AoV Angle of View

CLVIA Cumulative Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

FoV Field of View

NSA National Scenic Area

SNH Scottish Natural Heritage

ZTV Zone of Theoretical Visibility


31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022 v

Glossary

Glossary Term Glossary Text

Cumulative effects Additional changes caused by a proposed development in conjunction with other

similar developments or as a combined effect of a set of developments, taken

together’ (SNH, 2012)

Development* Any proposal that results in change to the landscape and/or visual environment.

Degree of change A combination of the scale, extent and duration of an effect also defined as

‘magnitude’.

Designated

Landscape*

Areas of landscape identified as being of importance at international, national or

local levels, either defined by statue or identified in development plans or other

documents.

Elements* Individual parts which make up the landscape, such as, for example, trees,

hedges and buildings.

Enhancement* Proposals that seek to improve the landscape resource of the site and its wider

setting beyond its baseline condition.

Environmental fit The relationship of a development to identified environmental opportunities and

constraints in its setting.

Environmental

Impact Assessment

(EIA)

A statutory process by which certain planned projects must be assessed before a

formal decision to proceed can be made. It involves the collection and

consideration of environmental information, which fulfils the assessment

requirements of the EIA Directive and EIA Regulations, including the publication

of an Environmental Statement.

Environmental

Statement (ES)

A document reporting the findings of the EIA and produced in accordance with the

EIA Directive as transposed into UK law by the EIA Regulations.

Feature* Particularly prominent or eye-catching elements in the landscape such as tree

clumps, church towers or wooded skylines OR a particular aspect of the project

proposal.

Field of View The horizontal angle of the view illustrated in a visualisation.


31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022 vi

Geographical

Information System

(GIS)

A system that captures, stores, analyses, manages and presents data linked to

location. It links spatial information to a digital database.

GLVIA 3 Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Third Edition,

published jointly by the Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental

Management and Assessment, 2013.

Heritage The historic environment and especially valued assets and qualities such as

historic buildings and cultural traditions.

Historic Landscape

Characterisation

(HLC) and Historic

Land-use

Assessment (HLA)

Historic characterisation is the identification and interpretation of the historic

dimension of the present-day landscape or townscape within a given area. HLC

is the term used in England and Wales, HLA is the term used in Scotland.

Indirect effects* Effects that result indirectly from the proposed project as a consequence of the

direct effects, often occurring away from the site, or as a result of a sequence of

interrelationships or a complex pathway. They may be separated by distance or in

time from the source of the effects.

Also used to describe indirect landscape effects concerning perceptual

characteristics and qualities of the landscape and indirect visual effects in relation

to issues such as ‘setting’.

Iterative design

process

The process by which project design is amended and improved by successive

stages of refinement which respond to growing understanding of environmental

issues.

Key characteristics Those combinations of elements which are particularly important to the current

character of the landscape and help to give an area its particularly distinctive

sense of place.

Land cover The surface cover of the land, usually expressed in terms of vegetation cover or

lack of it. Related to but not the same as land use.

Landscape and

Visual Impact

Assessment (LVIA)

A tool used to identify and assess the likely significance of the effects of change

resulting from development both on the landscape as an environmental resource

in its own right and on people’s views and visual amenity.

Landscape Character

Area (LCA)*

These are single unique areas which are the discrete geographical areas of a

particular landscape type.


31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022 vii

Landscape Character

Assessment

The process of identifying and describing variation in the character of the

landscape, and using this information to assist in managing change in the

landscape. It seeks to identify and explain the unique combination of elements

and features that make landscapes distinctive. The process results in the

production of a Landscape Character Assessment.

Landscape Character

Types (LCTs)*

These are distinct types of landscapes that are usually homogenous in character.

They are generic in nature in that they may occur in different areas in different

parts of the country, but wherever they occur they share broadly similar

combinations of geology, topography, drainage patterns, vegetation and historical

land use and settlement pattern, and perceptual and aesthetic attributes. (Topic

Paper 6, Countryside Agency and SNH 2004)

Landscape capacity The ability of a landscape to accommodate different amounts of change or

development of a specific type. Capacity reflects the landscape's sensitivity to the

type of change, and the value attached to the landscape, and is therefore

dependent on judgements about the desirability of retaining landscape

characteristics and the acceptability of their loss.

(http://www.snh.gov.uk/protecting-scotlands-nature/looking-after-

landscapes/landscape-resource-library/glossary-of-terms/).

Landscape

character*

A distinct, recognisable and consistent pattern of elements in the landscape that

makes one landscape different from another, rather than better or worse.

Landscape

classification

A process of sorting the landscape into different types using selected criteria but

without attaching relative values to different sorts of landscape.

Landscape

constraints

Components of the landscape resource such as views or mature trees recognised

as constraints to development. Often associated with landscape opportunities.

Landscape effects* Effects on the landscape as a resource in its own right.

An assessment of landscape effects deals with the effects of change and

development on landscape as a resource. The concern here is with how the

proposal will affect the elements that make up the landscape, the aesthetic and

perceptual aspects of the landscape and its distinctive character. (GLVIA3 2013,

Para 5.1).

Landscape fit The relationship of a development to identified landscape opportunities and

constraints in its setting.

Landscape patterns Spatial distributions of landscape elements combining to form patterns, which

may be distinctive, recognisable and describable e.g. hedgerows and stream

patterns.


31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022 viii

Landscape quality

(condition)*

A measure of the physical state of the landscape. It may include the extent to

which typical character is represented in individual areas, the intactness of the

landscape and the condition of individual elements.

Landscape qualities A term used to describe the aesthetic or perceptual and intangible characteristics

of the landscape such as scenic quality, tranquillity, sense of wildness or

remoteness. Cultural and artistic references may also be described here.

Landscape receptors

*

Defined aspects of the landscape resource that have the potential to be affected

by a proposal

Landscape resource The combination of elements that contribute to landscape context, character, and

value.

Landscape

sensitivity

The sensitivity of the landscape to a particular development considers the

susceptibility of the landscape and its value.

Landscape strategy The overall vision and objectives for what the landscape should be like in the

future, and what is thought to be desirable for a particular landscape type or area

as a whole, usually expressed in formally adopted plans and programmes or

related documents.

Landscape value* The relative value that is attached to different landscapes by society. A

landscape may be valued by different stakeholders for a whole variety of reasons.

Level of effect Determined through the combination of sensitivity of the receptor and the

proposed magnitude of change brought about by the development.

Magnitude (of

effect)*

A term that combines judgements about the size and scale of the effect, the

extent of the area over which it occurs, whether it is reversible or irreversible and

whether it is short term or long term in duration.

Millport Coastal

Flood Protection

Scheme

The scheme consists of offshore rock armour structures which will be built in the

vicinity of the rock islets within Millport Bay. Onshore works will include flood

walls, improvement works to existing coast protection structures, and works to

raise the level of existing grass areas. Works on the foreshore include shore-

connected rock armour breakwaters and rock armour revetments.

Mitigation Measures which are proposed to prevent, reduce and where possible offset any

significant adverse effects (or to avoid, reduce and if possible remedy identified

effects. (GLVIA3, 2013 Para 3.37).

Perception Combines the sensory (that we receive through our senses) with the cognitive

(our knowledge and understanding gained from many sources and experiences).

Perceptual Aspects A landscape may be valued for its perceptual qualities, notably wildness and/or

tranquillity. (GLVIA3, 2013 Box 5.1)


31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022 ix

Photomontage* A visualisation which superimposes an image of the proposed development upon

a photograph or series of photographs.

Positive or Negative

Types of Landscape

Effect

The landscape effects may be positive, neutral, or negative.

In landscape terms – a positive effect would require development to add to the

landscape quality and character of an area. Neutral landscape effects would

include low or negligible changes that may be considered as part of the ‘normal’

landscape processes such as maintenance or harvesting activities. A negative

effect may include the loss of landscape elements such as mature trees and

hedgerows as part of construction leading to a reduction in the landscape quality

and character of an area.

Positive or Negative

Types of Visual

Effect

The visual effects may be positive, neutral, or negative.

In visual terms – positive or negative effects are less easy to define or quantify

and require a subjective consideration of a number of factors affecting the view,

which may be positive, neutral, or negative. It is not the assumption of this

assessment that all change, including substantial levels of change is a negative

experience. Rather this assessment has considered factors such as the visual

composition of the landscape in the view together with the design and

composition, which may or may not be reasonably, accommodated within the

scale and character of the landscape as perceived from the receptor location.

Rarity The presence of rare elements or features in the landscape or the presence of a

rare Landscape Character Type. (GLVIA3 2013, Box 5.1)

Receptor Physical landscape resource, special interest, or viewer group that will experience

an effect.

Recreation Value* Evidence that the landscape is valued for recreational activity where experience

of the landscape is important. (GLVIA3 2013, Box 5.1)

Representativeness* Whether the landscape contains a particular character and/or features or

elements which are considered particularly important examples.

Residual effects Potential environmental effects, remaining after mitigation.

Scale Indicators Landscape elements and features of a known or recognisable scale such as

houses, trees, and vehicles that may be compared to other objects, where the

scale of height is less familiar, to indicate their true scale.

Scenic quality Depends upon perception and reflects the particular combination and pattern of

elements in the landscape, its aesthetic qualities, its more intangible sense of

place or ‘genius loci’ and other more intangible qualities. (GLVIA3 2013, Box 5.1)

Seascape Landscapes with views of the coast or seas, and coasts and adjacent marine

environments with cultural, historical and archaeological links with each other.


31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022 x

Sense of Place

(genius loci)

The essential character and spirit of an area: ‘genius loci’ literally means ‘spirit of

the place’.

Sensitivity* A term applied to specific receptors, combining judgements of the susceptibility of

the receptor to the specific type of change or development proposed and the

value associated to that receptor.

Significance A measure of the importance or gravity of the environmental effect, defined by

significance criteria specific to the environmental topic.

Significant Effects It is a requirement of the EIA Regulations to determine the likely significant effects

of the development on the environment which should relate to the level of an

effect and the type of effect.

The significance of an effect gives an indication as to the degree of importance

(based on the magnitude of the effect and the sensitivity of the receptor) that

should be attached to the impact described.

Whether or not an effect should be considered significant is not absolute and

requires the application of professional judgement.

Significant – ‘noteworthy, of considerable amount or effect or importance, not

insignificant or negligible’. The Concise Oxford Dictionary.

Those levels and types of landscape and visual effect likely to have a major or

important / noteworthy or special effect of which a decision maker should take

particular note.

Susceptibility* The ability of a defined landscape or visual receptor to accommodate the specific

proposed development without undue negative consequences.

Sustainability* The principle that the environment should be protected in such a condition and to

such a degree that ensures new development meets the needs of the present

without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Temporary or

permanent effects

Effects may be considered as temporary or permanent.

Time depth Historical layering – the idea of landscape as a ‘palimpsest’, a much written-over

asset of landscape.

Townscape The character and composition of the built environment including the buildings

and the relationships between them, the different types of urban open space,

including green spaces, and the relationship between buildings and open spaces.

Type or Nature of

effect

Whether an effect is direct or indirect, temporary or permanent, positive

(beneficial), neutral or negative (adverse) solus or cumulative.

Viewpoints Selected for illustration of the visual effects fall broadly into three groups:

Representative Viewpoints: selected to represent the experience of different types

of visual receptor, where larger numbers of viewpoints cannot all be included


31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022 xi

individually and where the significant effects are unlikely to differ – for example

certain points may be chosen to represent the view of users of particular public

footpaths and bridleways;

Specific Viewpoints: chosen because they are key and sometimes promoted

viewpoints within the landscape, including for example specific local visitor

attractions, such as landscapes with statutory landscape designations or

viewpoints with particular cultural landscape associations.

Illustrative Viewpoints: chosen specifically to demonstrate a particular effect or

specific issues, which might, for example, be the restricted visibility at certain

locations. (GLVIA3 2013, Para 6.19)

Visual amenity The overall views and surroundings, which provide a visual setting or backdrop to

the activities of people living, working, participating in recreational activities,

visiting or travelling through an area.

Visual dominance A visual effect often referred to in respect of residential properties that in relation

to development would be subject to blocking of views, or reduction of light /

shadowing, and high levels of visual intrusion.

Visual effect* Effects on specific views and on the general visual amenity experienced by

people.

Visual Receptors* Individuals and/or defined groups of people who have the potential to be affected

by a proposal.

Visual sensitivity The sensitivity of visual receptors such as residents, relative to their location and

context, to visual change proposed by development.

Visualisation Computer visualisation, photomontage, or other technique to illustrate the

appearance of the development from a known location.

Wireline / Wireframe A computer-generated line drawing of the DTM (digital terrain model) and the

proposed development from a known location.

Zone of Theoretical

Visibility (ZTV)*

A map, usually digitally produced, showing areas of land within which a

development is theoretical visible.


31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022 1

22 Seascape, Landscape and Visual Impact

22.1 Introduction

1. This chapter of the Environmental Statement (ES) considers the potential impacts of the proposed

Millport Coastal Flood Protection Scheme (the proposed scheme) on Seascape, Landscape and Visual

Impact. The SLVIA reported in this chapter has been produced by chartered landscape architects at

Wood.

2. Seascape, Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (SLVIA) forms one of the key components of

the EIA process to comply with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)

(Scotland) Regulations 2017 and allows consideration of the proposed scheme against the relevant

planning policies, relating to the landscape and seascape resource, and visual amenity.

3. The objective of this assessment will be to determine the landscape, seascape and visual effects of

the proposed scheme on the existing landscape and seascape resource, and visual amenity. The

following landscape, seascape and visual receptors have been assessed:

• Landscape and seascape character, key characteristics and elements;

• Designated landscapes and seascapes; and

• Views and visual amenity experienced by residents, tourists, visitors, and road and ferry users.

4. The assessment process has encompassed the construction and operation phases of the proposed

scheme and has included design iteration and further assessment of the residual effects. The aim of

the process has sought to achieve an acceptable compromise between sustainable design,

environmental considerations and achieving an acceptable design in terms of landscape, seascape

and visual effects.

5. The structures forming the proposed scheme have been designed to have a life span of at least 50

years. As the purpose of the proposed scheme is for flood protection, it is unlikely that it would be

decommissioned in entirety; it is more likely that it would be repaired, or sections replaced or improved

if needed in the future. Therefore, the decommissioning phase has not been included in the

assessment as any replacements or improvements in the future would be similar to those effects

assessed during the construction phase.

6. All figures referred to in this chapter are provided in Volume II of this ES.

7. Additional information to support the assessment of impacts on seascape, landscape and visual

impacts is provided separately in the following appendices:

• Appendix 22.1 Landscape Design and Access Statement (Volume III):

22.2 Policy, Legislation and Guidance

8. There are a number of pieces of legislation applicable to the SLVIA. The following key pieces of

International and UK legislation which are relevant to this chapter. Further details are provided in

Chapter 2 Policy and Legislation on the following legislation.

9. The policies and plans outlined throughout this section have also been reviewed for their relevance

to seascape, landscape and visual impact when undertaking the EIA for the proposed scheme.



10. The SLVIA process has taken account of national and local planning policy in relation to the proposed

scheme, as well as the Adopted North Ayrshire Council Local Development Plan (28 November 2019)

Further information on planning policy is provided in Chapter 2 Policy and Legislation.

11. The SLVIA has also taken into account North Ayrshire Council’s Landscape Capacity Assessment –

Arran and Cumbrae – Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas (2008), where

relevant. It should be noted that the landscape capacity assessment largely relates to residential

developments, and the landscape and seascape character types in the report have now been

superseded by SNH (landscape character) in 2019 and the Firth of Clyde Forum (seascape) in 2013.

22.2.1 International Legislation and Policy

12. Table 22-1 below provides a brief summary of the key international legislation and policy relevant to

the scheme.

Table 22-1 Summary of key international legislation and policy relevant to this proposed scheme

Legislation Relevance

European Landscape Convention

Promotes the protection, management and planning of all landscapes, including

natural, managed and urban areas as well as special and degraded landscapes.

Aims to organise European co-operation on landscape issues. It is not a European

Union (EU) Directive.

22.2.2 National Legislation and Policy

22.2.2.1 National Legislation

13. Table 22-2 below provides a brief summary of the key national legislation and policy relevant to the

scheme.

Table 22-2 Summary of key national legislation and policy relevant to this proposed scheme

Legislation Relevance

Land Reform (Scotland) Act

2003 (Amended 2016)

Relates to access to the countryside as well as and Core Paths management

and access

22.2.2.2 National Planning Policy

National Planning Framework:

14. Scotland’s third National Planning Framework (NPF) (Scottish Government, 2014a) includes the

following ambitions relevant to the marine environment at Millport, and these have been considered

when undertaking the SLVIA for the proposed scheme.

15. Para 4.4 Scotland’s landscapes are spectacular, contributing to our quality of life, our national identity

and the visitor economy. Landscape quality is found across Scotland and all landscapes support

place-making. National Scenic Areas and National Parks attract many visitors and reinforce our

international image. We also want to continue our strong protection for our wildest landscapes – wild

land is a nationally important asset. Closer to settlements landscapes have an important role to play

in sustaining local distinctiveness and cultural identity, and in supporting health and well-being.

16. Para 4.31 As climate change impacts on Scotland’s coastline, there will be a need to address the

long-term resilience of some island and coastal communities.



Scotland’s National Marine Plan: A Single Framework for Managing Our Seas

17. This Plan provides a comprehensive overarching framework for all marine activity in Scotland’s

waters. The following policies and paragraphs have been considered when undertaking the SLVIA

for the proposed scheme:

18. Policy GEN 7 Landscape / seascape: Marine planners and decision makers should ensure that

development and use of the marine environment take seascape, landscape and visual impacts into

account.

19. 4.27 The Scottish Government is committed to implementing the principles of the European

Landscape Convention, which includes seascapes and applies an ‘all landscapes approach’ that

addresses developed, altered and cultural landscapes as well as more natural scenic areas. This

does not preclude development or change, but recommends that it is carried out appropriately for the

area’s landscape character and visual amenity.

20. 4.29. In making these judgements, planners and decision makers should have regard to the qualities

of the location in question, including any designation. More generally, the siting and design of a

development should take account of the local landscape/seascape character and quality. Potential

effects on landscapes and seascapes, including cumulative effects should be considered and

developers should seek to minimise adverse impacts through careful planning and design,

considering the services which the natural environment is providing and maximising the potential for

enhancement.

21. 4.31. Existing Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) guidance on the principles of good siting and design

and examples of emerging good practice should be followed. SNH Landscape Character

Assessments and forthcoming SNH guidance on undertaking Coastal Character Assessment also

provide useful tools in considering impacts on landscape.

Scottish Planning Policy

22. Scotland’s Planning Policy (SPP) (Scottish Government, 2014b) contains the following Policy

Principles with regards to Valuing the Natural Environment and these have been taken into

consideration when undertaking the EIA for the proposed scheme:

23. The planning system should:

• Facilitate positive change while maintaining and enhancing distinctive landscape character.

24. This means that policies and decisions should be guided by the following principles:

• supporting good design and the six qualities of successful places;

• protecting, enhancing and promoting access to natural heritage, including green infrastructure,

landscape and the wider environment;

25. With regard to areas of local landscape value, SPP states the purpose of areas of local landscape

value should be to:

• safeguard and enhance the character and quality of a landscape which is important or particularly

valued locally or regionally; or

• promote understanding and awareness of the distinctive character and special qualities of local

landscapes; or

• safeguard and promote important local settings for outdoor recreation and tourism.



26. With regard to seascape assessment, SPP states The Scottish Government is committed to

implementing the principles of the European Landscape Convention, which applies an ‘all landscapes

approach’ and although it does not specifically define seascape this should be taken as meaning

‘landscapes with views of the coast or sea and the adjacent marine environment with cultural,

historical and archaeological links to each other.

Planning Advice Notes (PANS)

27. Planning Advice Note (PAN) 1/2013: Environmental Impact Assessment explains the role of individual

planning authorities and that of the Consultation Bodies in EIA, as well as providing guidance on the

ways in which EIA can be integrated into the overall development management process.

28. PAN 60: Planning for Natural Heritage provides advice on how development and the planning system

can contribute to the conservation, enhancement, enjoyment and understanding of Scotland's natural

environment and encourages developers and planning authorities to be positive and creative in

addressing natural heritage issues. It complements the National Planning Policy Guideline on Natural

Heritage (NPPG 14), with examples of good planning practice in relation to natural heritage drawn

from across Scotland highlighted in a number of case studies.

National Planning Policy Guidelines (NPPG)

29. National Planning Policy Guideline (NPPG) 14: Natural Heritage gives guidance on how the

Government's policies for the conservation and enhancement of Scotland's natural heritage should

be reflected in land use planning. In this context, Scotland's natural heritage includes its plants and

animals, its landforms and geology, and its natural beauty and amenity. Natural heritage embraces

the combination and interrelationship of landform, habitat, wildlife and landscape and their capacity

to provide enjoyment and inspiration. It therefore encompasses both physical attributes and aesthetic

values and, given the long interaction between human communities and the land in Scotland, has

important cultural and economic dimensions.

A Land Use Strategy for Scotland 2016-2021

30. The Land Use Strategy results from the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 which requires the Land

Use Strategy to be reviewed every five years. With regard to development, the Land Use Strategy

states that:

• e) Landscape change should be managed positively and sympathetically, considering the

implications of change at a scale appropriate to the landscape in question, given that all

Scotland's landscapes are important to our sense of identity and to our individual and social

wellbeing.

• f) Land-use decisions should be informed by an understanding of the opportunities and threats

brought about by the changing climate. Greenhouse gas emissions associated with land use

should be reduced and land should continue to contribute to delivering climate change adaptation

and mitigation objectives.



22.2.3 Regional Legislation and Policy

Clyde Muirshiel Regional Park Strategy 2016 - 2021

31. Clyde Muirshiel Regional Park publishes a five-yearly park strategy outlining the park’s aspirations

and policies. The current strategy covers the period to 2021 and states that:

• The Park Authority recognises landscape and character as unique assets that contribute to the

area’s popularity and regional importance. The Park Authority will seek to maintain these assets

and where possible work collaboratively to further benefit park visitors.

32. This is reflected within the Park’s Action Plan which outlines ‘Environmental Management’ as a

‘Priority Activity’ and states the objective to:

• Enhance the park’s natural heritage whilst safeguarding key species, habitats and landscape

character.

22.2.4 Local Planning Policy

33. The proposed scheme falls within the North Ayrshire Council local authority boundaries.

34. North Ayrshire Council have adopted a new Local Development Plan on 28 November 2019 which

covers a 20 year period, up to 2025.

35. For the purpose of the Local Plan, Millport and the footprint of the proposed scheme is categorised

to be within ‘Developed Coast’.

36. The Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan ‘Growing A Sustainable Ayrshire’ (North Ayrshire Council, East

Ayrshire Council and South Ayrshire Council, 2007) establishes a framework that brings together the

aspirations of communities with those of business and industry, and the area’s many supporting

agencies and organisations, to provide a strategic land use context to the year 2025. The Plan

recognises landscape character as a key element in promoting development, providing an attractive

setting for existing communities and new investment.

37. Table 22-2Table 22-3 provides details of the local planning policy documents and the relevant policies

in respect to the SLVIA. These policy document have been considered when undertaking the SLVIA

for the proposed scheme.

Table 22-3 Relevant local planning policies

Document Policy / Guidance Policy / Guidance purpose ES Reference

North Ayrshire

Council Local

Development Plan,

November 2019

(North Ayrshire

Council, 2019)

Policy 15: Landscape

and Seascape

The policy states:

We will support development that

protects and/ or enhances our

landscape/seascape character, avoiding

unacceptable adverse impacts on our

designated and non-designated

landscape areas and features. In

particular, we will consider the following:

a) National Scenic Areas

Development that affects the North Arran

National Scenic Area including the need

This chapter

(Section 22.6) has

assessed the

potential effects on

landscape

character, local

landscape features

and Special

Landscape Areas,

and has included

appropriate

mitigation measures,




to protect existing sport and recreation

interests, will only be supported where:

i) the objectives of the designation and

the overall integrity of the area will not be

compromised; or

ii) any significant adverse effects on the

qualities for which the area has been

designated are clearly outweighed by

social, environmental or economic

benefits of national importance.

b) Special Landscape Areas

We will only support development which

affects Special Landscape Areas where

it would not have an unacceptable

impact on their special character,

qualities and setting.

Local Landscape Features

Where appropriate, development should

take into consideration its individual and

cumulative

impacts on landscape features,

including:

i) patterns of woodlands, fields,

hedgerows and trees;

ii) lochs, ponds, watercourses, wetlands,

the coast and wider seascape;

iii) settlement setting, including

approaches to settlements;

iv) the setting of green network corridors,

such as important transport routes and

the cycle and footpath network;

v) historic, natural and recreational

features of interest, skylines and hill

features, including important views to,

from and within them.

For all development with the potential to

have an impact on either Landscape

Character or Landscape features

(including their setting), appropriate

mitigation measures should be

considered as part of any planning

application. Where there is potential for

development to result in significant

adverse landscape/visual impact, a

landscape and visual impact assessment

(LVIA) will be required.

where required and

is described in detail

in the Design

Statement.

There would be no

effects on National

Scenic Areas as a

result of the

proposed scheme.




North Ayrshire

Council

Environmental

Policy, 2012 (North

Ayrshire Council,

2012)

Challenge 3: To Protect and Enhance

the Natural Environment by:

….

Conserving and enhancing the quality

and character of the landscape;

….

Encouraging sustainable public access

to and enjoyment of the outdoors.

This chapter

(Section 22.6) has

assessed the

potential effects of

the proposed

scheme on

landscape character

and recreational

routes.

Ayrshire Joint

Structure Plan

(2014)

ENV 1 Landscape

Quality

The policy states:

The quality of Ayrshire’s landscape and

its distinctive local characteristics shall

be maintained and enhanced. In

providing for new development, particular

care shall be taken to conserve those

features that contribute to local

distinctiveness including:

A) settings of communities and buildings

within the landscape;

B) patterns of woodland, fields,

hedgerows and tree features;

C) special qualities of rivers, estuaries

and coasts;

D) historic landscapes; and

E) skylines and hill features, including

prominent views.

Local plans shall seek to protect and

enhance landscape character and

establish criteria of the assessment of

future development proposals in the

context of the particular local landscape

type within which the development is

proposed.

This chapter

(Section 22.6) has

assessed the

potential effects of

the proposed

scheme on

landscape character

taking into account

landscape quality

and other

characteristics as

defined in the 2019

SNH Landscape

Character

Assessment.

ENV 2 Landscape

Protection

The policy states:

In Sensitive Landscape Character Areas,

the protection and enhancement of the

landscape shall be given full

consideration in the preparation of local

plans and the determination of planning

applications.

The assessment in

this chapter has

taken into account

the relevant policies

in the local plans as

they relate to

landscape

character.

22.2.5 Best Practice and Guidance

38. The methodology for the SLVIA has been undertaken in accordance with best practice guidance

including, but not limited to, the following:

• Landscape Institute and IEMA (2013). Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment,

3rd Edition, hereafter referred to as GLVIA 3;



• Landscape Institute (2019) Visual Representation of Development Proposals, Technical

Guidance Note 06/19; and

• Carol Anderson Landscape Associates for SNH (2018). Guidance on Coastal Character

Assessment, Version 1a.

39. Other relevant guidance documents considered in the SLVIA include the following:

• Scottish Natural Heritage (2018). Coastal Character Assessment, Guidance Note, Version 1a;

• North Ayrshire Council (2008). Landscape Capacity Assessment - Arran and Cumbrae,

Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas;

• North Ayrshire Council, Coastal Design Guidance; and

• Scottish Natural Heritage (2019) Landscape Character Assessment.

22.3 Consultation

40. To inform the ES, North Ayrshire Council has undertaken a thorough pre-application consultation

process, which has included the following key stages:

• Scoping Reports submitted to Marine Scotland and North Ayrshire Council (Royal HaskoningDHV

2017); and

• Scoping Opinion received from Marine Scotland and North Ayrshire Council (2017).

• Public consultation and discussions with community groups (2016-2019); and

• Individual consultation meetings, undertaken specifically to inform development of the scheme

proposals and the EIA process.

41. Full details of the proposed scheme consultation process to date is presented within Chapter 3 EIA

Methodology and Consultation.

42. A summary of the consultation carried out at key stages throughout the proposed scheme, of

particular relevance to seascape, landscape and visual impact, is presented in Table 22-4.

Table 22-4 Consultation responses

Consultee Date/

Document

Comment Response / Where

addressed in the ES

Cumbrae

Marine

19/04/17 Scoping

Report

Believes that the scheme will be an

eyesore (the onshore elements), will lead

to traffic and ferry issues and that this will

impact on the local community and

tourism negatively.

The onshore elements of

the proposed scheme

have been designed to

minimise visual impact

through colour matching

the concrete to existing

elements, the use of wall

as seating and regrading

soil to screen low lying

sections of wall. The

repetition of the same

materials throughout the

scheme would provide

visual cohesion. . Other

issues are addressed in

Chapter 20 Traffic and



Consultee Date/

Document


addressed in the ES

Transport and Chapter

23 Tourism and

Recreation.

Millport

Harbour Users

Group

Community Group

Meeting, 16th August

2016

The harbour users expressed concern

about the proposed extension of Millport

Pier to form a nearshore breakwater. This

option was previously preferred following

the initial high-level options appraisal.

Concerns principally related to navigation

issues, the current condition of Millport

Pier, and the visual impact of a structure

close to the shore.

An alternative solution was suggested by

the community, comprising an offshore

breakwater between the Leug and the

Spoig rock outcrops located offshore in

Millport Bay. Comments about this

proposal included: the visual impact of an

offshore breakwater would be less than a

breakwater extension to the pier.

The alternative proposals

were fully considered as

part of the scheme

development and form

the basis for the

proposed scheme.

Further detail is included

in Chapter 4 Site

Selection and

Assessment of

Alternatives.

Community

engagement

workshops

and

associated

questionnaires

November/December

2016

March 2017

February 2019

August 2019

The first consultation and questionnaire

(November/December 2016) focussed on

how the seafront is used and the important

aspects to be considered in development

of the scheme, including visual impact.

The second consultation and

questionnaire (March 2017) provided an

update on the development of the scheme

proposals and explored the community’s

wider ambitions for the town (led by the

Council’s Tourism and Coastal Economy

team).

The third consultation and questionnaire

(February 2019) updated local residents

on progress with scheme development,

including the findings of the Scheme

Recommendation Report that was

presented to North Ayrshire Council’s

Cabinet. The community design

workshops explored the requirements for

the onshore works, including the location,

appearance, landscaping and access

needs for the flood walls and other

structures.

The fourth consultation and questionnaire

(August 2019) event updated the Millport

Details of these

Community Engagement

Workshops and

Associated

Questionnaires are

provided in Appendix 3.2.



Consultee Date/

Document


addressed in the ES

community on the progress with the

development of the scheme proposals.

The aim of the questionnaire provided

alongside this event was to provide a

further opportunity for comment before the

formal Flood Protection Scheme

documents were prepared and submitted

for statutory consultation and approval by

the Scottish Government.

As the Community Consultation

Programme has developed, feedback has

been increasingly positive. The August

2019 Community Consultation was a very

positive event, with good attendance.

Support for the scheme proposals was

again strong, building on the positive

feedback previously received during the

February 2019 consultation. Millport

residents provided overwhelmingly

positive feedback on how their comments

had been taken on board in the

development of the onshore elements of

the scheme since the February community

design workshops.

Targeted

consultation

meetings with

residents of

the Cross

House, Clyde

Street and

Crichton

Street

July 2019

For the Cross House, the position of the

flood wall in front of the property was

reviewed. It was agreed that the garden

wall should be replaced with a flood wall,

instead of an additional wall seaward of

the garden wall.

For Clyde Street, additional information

was provided about the rock revetment

proposals, including the height of the rock

revetment compared to the natural rock

foreshore. Further details of the rock

revetment proposals (cross-sections,

elevations and visualisations) were

provided at the August consultation event

to confirm the information provided during

the targeted meetings.

The flood protection scheme proposals for

Crichton Street have been reviewed again

to ensure that access to the foreshore is

maintained and the height of the flood wall

minimised to reduce visual impact.

Chapter 3 EIA

Methodology and

Consultation

Chapter 4 Site Selection

and Assessment of

Alternatives

Chapter 5 Project

Description



22.4 Methodology

22.4.1 Defining the Study Area

43. A Study Area of 2km radius from the proposed scheme has been established, as illustrated in Volume

II Figure 22-1, after consideration of the nature and scale of the proposed scheme in relation to the

existing 'host' landscape, the wider landscape and range of potential landscape, seascape and visual

receptors. A further 0.5km radius detailed Study Area has also been considered to provide further

clarity and greater information at a more detailed level. The level of detail for the wider and detailed

Study Areas are as follows:

• 2km Radius Study Area: Provides illustration of surrounding landscape and seascape character

including any nationally designated landscapes and national level recreational routes such as

Scotland's Great Trails, cycle and ferry routes, and visitor attractions; and

• 0.5km Radius Detailed Study Area: Provides illustration of locally designated landscapes and

locally promoted recreational routes such as Core Paths.

44. It is important to note that the boundary of the Study Area is not the limit of potential visibility of the

proposed scheme. Rather it is an area, based on the scale and nature of the proposed scheme to

determine a suitable Study Area which would contain all potential significant landscape, seascape

and visual effects.

22.4.2 Landscape / Seascape Assessment

45. Landscape Effects are defined by the Landscape Institute in GLVIA 3, paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 as

follows:

46. “An assessment of landscape effects deals with the effects of change and development on landscape

as a resource. The concern ... is with how the proposal will affect the elements that make up the

landscape, the aesthetic and perceptual aspects of the landscape and its distinctive character. ... The

area of landscape that should be covered in assessing landscape effects should include the site itself

and the full extent of the wider landscape around it which the development may influence in a

significant manner.”

47. Seascape is defined by the Landscape Institute in GLVIA 3, as follows: “Landscapes with views of

the coast or seas, and coasts and the adjacent marine environment with cultural, historical and

archaeological links with each other”. GLVIA 3 also states in paragraph 2.6 that “This guidance is

equally applicable to all forms of landscape and does not separate townscape and seascape out for

special treatment”

48. The potential landscape and seascape effects, occurring during the construction and operation

phases may therefore include, but are not restricted to the following:

• Changes to landscape elements: the addition of new elements or the removal of existing elements

such as trees, vegetation and buildings and other characteristic elements of the landscape

character type;

• Changes to seascape elements: the addition of new elements or the removal of existing elements

such as maritime influences and coastal edge character and other characteristic elements of the

seascape or coastal character type;



• Changes to landscape / seascape qualities: degradation or erosion of landscape / seascape

elements and patterns and perceptual characteristics, particularly those that form key

characteristic elements of landscape / seascape character types / areas or contribute to the

landscape value;

• Changes to landscape / seascape character: Landscape / seascape character may be affected

through the incremental effect on characteristic elements, landscape / seascape patterns and

qualities (including perceptual characteristics) and the addition of new features, the magnitude of

which is sufficient to alter the overall landscape / seascape character within a particular area; and

• Cumulative landscape / seascape effects: where more than one development may lead to a

potential landscape / seascape effect.

49. Development may have a direct (physical) effect on the landscape / seascape as well as an indirect

effect which would be perceived from the wider landscape / seascape, or other areas of landscape,

outside the host landscape / seascape character type / area.

22.4.2.1 Evaluating Landscape / Seascape Sensitivity to Change

50. The sensitivity of the landscape / seascape to a particular development considers the susceptibility

of the landscape / seascape and its value. The overall sensitivity is described as High, Medium, Low,

or Negligible. Landscape / seascape sensitivity often varies in response to both the type of

development proposed and the particular site location, such that landscape / seascape sensitivity

needs to be considered on a case by case basis. This should not be confused with ‘inherent

sensitivity’ where areas of the landscape / seascape may be referred to as inherently of ‘high’ or ‘low’

sensitivity. For example, a National Scenic Area (NSA) may be described as inherently of high

sensitivity on account of its designation, although it may prove to be less sensitive to particular

development and/or of variable sensitivity across the geographical area of the NSA. Conversely, an

undesignated landscape / seascape may be of high sensitivity to a particular development regardless

of the lack of local or national designation. The main factors considered are discussed as follows:

Landscape / Seascape Susceptibility

51. Landscape susceptibility according to GLVIA 3 means “the ability of the landscape to accommodate

the development without undue consequences for maintenance of the baseline situation and/or the

achievement of landscape planning policies and strategies”.

52. Judgements on landscape / seascape susceptibility include references to both the physical and

aesthetic landscape / seascape characteristics, and the potential scope for mitigation. Landscape /

seascape susceptibility varies according to different areas of landscape / seascape character.

Generally speaking, lower landscape / seascape susceptibility together with lower landscape /

seascape value tends to indicate lower landscape / seascape sensitivity to development. Conversely,

higher landscape / seascape susceptibility and value tend to indicate higher landscape / seascape

sensitivity to development.

Landscape / Seascape Value

53. This includes the consideration of a range of features which may include the presence or absence of

landscape designation, landscape / seascape and scenic qualities, rarity / representativeness,

conservation interests, recreational value, perceptual qualities such as tranquillity and historical or

cultural associations, as set out in GLVIA 3, page 84, Box 5.1. The importance attached to a

landscape / seascape, often as a basis for designation or recognition, which expresses national or

local consensus, because of its quality including cultural associations, scenic or aesthetic qualities.



Landscape / seascape value may be indicated by the presence or absence of a landscape planning

designation (higher value) indicating a landscape / seascape of national or local value accordingly or

an undesignated landscape / seascape (lower value).

54. The absence of a landscape planning designation should not assume an area of ‘low’ landscape

value and undesignated areas of landscape / seascape are often of some local value. Indications of

this are likely to be present in the form of documented, locally valued, cultural / natural heritage and

scenic or aesthetic qualities such as ‘wildness’ or the presence of viewing platforms or benches. It

should be noted that a landscape / seascape of high value may not always equate to areas of high

landscape / seascape quality and that areas of low landscape / seascape value may contain areas of

higher landscape / seascape quality. The state of repair or condition of the elements of a particular

landscape / seascape, its integrity and intactness and the extent to which its distinctive character is

apparent are also relevant. The quality of a landscape / seascape element or characteristic may also

be influenced by the degree to which it may contribute to the overall landscape / seascape character

type/area, its rarity, fragility, and potential for replacement or mitigation.

Evaluating the Magnitude of Landscape / Seascape Change

55. The ‘magnitude’ or ‘degree of change’ resulting from a particular development is described as High,

Medium, Low, Negligible or None. This is assessed by considering the scale, geographical extent

and duration of the proposed change, which may include the loss or addition of particular features,

changes to landscape / seascape quality and changes to landscape / seascape character. As such

this needs to be considered on a case by case basis. It may be possible for some mitigation measures

to reduce the magnitude of change and consequently the residual landscape / seascape effects, and

for these reasons the landscape design of the development should form an iterative part of the

assessment process. The main factors to be considered are discussed as follows.

• Loss, Alteration, or Addition to Landscape / Seascape Elements;

• Loss, Alteration, or Addition to Landscape / Seascape Characteristics / Quality; and

• Change to Landscape / Seascape Character.

56. In addition to the scale or magnitude of the effect, GLVIA 3 advises that consideration should also be

given to the geographical extent, and duration and reversibility of a landscape / seascape effect.

Table 22-5 Landscape / Seascape Sensitivity and Magnitude

Examples of Landscape / Seascape Sensitivity

High

Landscape / Seascape character, characteristics, and elements where, through consideration of

the landscape / seascape resource and characteristics, there would generally be no or limited

landscape / seascape capacity or scope for landscape / seascape change and higher landscape /

seascape value and quality of higher susceptibility. Often includes landscapes / seascape which

are nationally, internationally or regionally designated.

Medium

Landscape / seascape character, characteristics, and elements where, through consideration of

the landscape / seascape resource and characteristics, there would be some landscape /

seascape capacity or some scope for landscape / seascape change. Often includes landscapes /

seascape of medium landscape / seascape value and quality which may be locally designated or

undesignated.

Low

Landscape / seascape character, characteristics and elements where, through consideration of the

landscape / seascape resource and characteristics, there would be greater landscape / seascape

capacity or scope for landscape / seascape change to accommodate the proposed type of

development as part of spatial strategy for example. Usually applies to landscapes / seascapes



with a lower landscape susceptibility to development. May also apply to landscapes that may have

been subject to intensive agriculture, blanket forestry or other man-made development.

Negligible

Landscape / seascape character, characteristics and elements where there is a high landscape /

seascape capacity or a planned desire for landscape / seascape change of the type proposed as

part of spatial strategy for example. Usually applies to landscapes / seascapes with a lower

landscape susceptibility to development. May also apply to derelict landscapes, or vacant land,

areas of mineral extraction and / or land fill for example.

Examples of Landscape / Seascape Magnitude

High

A total or large-scale change and / or extent that may include the loss of key landscape / seascape

characteristics or the addition of new uncharacteristic features or elements, that would become the

dominant characteristics of the landscape / seascape, and change the overall landscape /

seascape quality, and character over a large area.

Medium

A medium-scale change of limited scale and extent including the loss of some key landscape /

seascape characteristics or elements, or the addition of some new uncharacteristic features or

elements that would potentially change the landscape / seascape quality and character of a

localised area or part of a landscape / seascape character type/area.

Low

A low-scale change affecting small areas of landscape / seascape character and quality, including

the loss of lower value landscape / seascape elements, or the addition of new features or elements

of limited characterising influence.

None There would be no change to the receptor

22.4.3 Visual Assessment

57. Visual Effects are concerned wholly with the effect of the development on views, and the general

visual amenity and are defined by the Landscape Institute in GLVIA 3, paragraphs 6.1 as follows:

58. “An assessment of visual effects deals with the effects of change and development on views available

to people and their visual amenity. The concern ... is with assessing how the surroundings of

individuals or groups of people may be specifically affected by changes in the context and character

of views.”

59. Visual effects are identified for different receptors (people) who will experience the view(s) at their

places of residence, during recreational activities, at work, or when travelling through the area. The

visual effects may include the following:

• Visual effect: a change to an existing static view, sequential views, or wider visual amenity as a

result of development or the loss of particular landscape / seascape elements or features already

present in the view(s); and

• Cumulative visual effects: the cumulative or incremental visibility of similar types of development

may combine to have a cumulative visual effect.

22.4.3.1 Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV)

60. A plan mapping the Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) is used to analyse the extent of theoretical

visibility of the proposed scheme or part of the proposed scheme, across the Study Area and to assist

with viewpoint selection. The ZTV takes into account the screening effects of buildings, localised

landform and some vegetation, unless specifically noted. The ZTV provides a starting point in the

assessment process and accordingly tend towards giving a ‘worst case’ or greatest calculation of the

theoretical visibility.



22.4.3.2 Viewpoint Analysis

61. Viewpoint analysis is used to assist the assessment and is conducted from selected viewpoints within

the Study Area. The purpose of this is to assess both the level of visual impact for particular receptors

and to help guide the design process and focus the assessment. A range of viewpoints are examined

in detail and analysed to determine whether a significant visual effect would occur. By arranging the

viewpoints in order of distance it is possible to define a threshold or outer geographical limit, beyond

which there would be no further significant effects.

62. The assessment involves visiting the viewpoint location and viewing illustrations prepared for each

viewpoint location. The fieldwork is conducted in periods of fine weather with good visibility and

considers seasonal changes such as reduced leaf cover or hedgerow maintenance.

22.4.3.3 Evaluating Visual Sensitivity to Change

63. Visual effects are also assessed by considering the sensitivity of the visual receptor (people or groups

of people) and the proposed magnitude of change. The sensitivity takes account of the susceptibility

of the receptor and the value attached to the view. Sensitivity is assessed as High, Medium, Low and

Negligible although in practice ‘negligible’ sensitivity is not used.

22.4.3.4 Visual Assessment: Susceptibility

64. The main factors to consider are the activity or occupation of the receptor at the viewpoint or receptor

location and the extent to which their attention or interest may be focused on the view and visual

amenity of the surrounding landscape. Whilst it is accepted that people will undertake a range of

different activities, their visual experience of a development will change according to where they are,

and what they are doing and susceptibility is assessed as follows:

• People at nationally recognised viewpoints (for example the Queen's View or Scott's View) people

at views / vistas attached to heritage features (such as Gardens and Designed Landscapes) or

other locations recognised nationally in art or literature, are assessed as of high susceptibility.

Residents and people engaged in out-door recreation, where the focus of the activity is on

enjoyment of the landscape and there is a high frequency of use, are also considered to be of

high susceptibility;

• People on local footpaths routed through undesignated, landscapes that may be of lower scenic

quality, and people engaged in sport, or travelling / commuting are considered to be of less

susceptibility (medium); and

• People at work as the least (low) susceptibility.

22.4.3.5 Visual Assessment: Value

65. In relation to value, consideration is given to the value of the view(s) through reference to local or

national scenic landscape designation. Other factors to consider include the importance or popularity

of the view(s) and/or the likely numbers of viewers and the location and context of the viewpoint (in

terms of the main primary or secondary views from a receptor location). The visual experience from

a tourist destination, for example, could involve either the key views to or from the main attraction, or

those from the car-park / service area, and this context will affect the sensitivity and value of the

views. Whilst views (from car-parks / service areas) may still be experienced by receptors of

inherently higher sensitivity, these types of views should not be considered of higher value or

sensitivity.

66. Landmarks / tourist attractions and national trails visited and used by large numbers of people are

likely to be of higher value and more sensitive than those which are less visited. Occasionally there



may be exceptions such as motorways where, although there are higher numbers of receptors these

are generally considered to be of lower value. Conversely some less well visited footpaths within

Wild Land Areas for example, may be of higher value precisely because of the lower visitor numbers.

22.4.3.6 Evaluating the Magnitude of Change to the View

67. The magnitude of change is described as High, Medium, Low or Zero, and is assessed by taking into

account possible changes caused by the proposed scheme, which may affect the view. In those

instances where the proposed scheme would not be visible and there would be no change to the

view, the magnitude has been recorded as ‘zero’ and the level of effect as ‘no view’.

68. The magnitude of visual change is described by reference to the scale of change, contracts, distance,

speed of travel, angle of view, screening, background, nature of visibility, geographical extent and

duration and reversibility of the proposed scheme.

69. The level of visual effect is evaluated through the combination of visual sensitivity and magnitude of

change, a process assisted by the matrix in Table 22-7, which is used to guide the assessment. In

those instances where there would be no change or no visibility or view of the proposed scheme, the

magnitude has been recorded as ‘Zero’ and the level of effect as ‘No View’.

70. Once the level of effect has been assessed, a judgement is then made as to whether the level of

effect is ‘significant’ as required by the relevant EIA Regulations. Further information is also provided

about the nature of the effects (whether these would be direct / indirect, temporary / permanent /

reversible, solus / cumulative, or positive, neutral or negative).



Table 22-6 Visual Receptor Sensitivity and Magnitude

Examples of Visual Sensitivity

High

People in residential properties or settlements and on long distance, strategic footpaths or

popular footpaths and tourist destinations, viewing important landscape features, beauty spots

and picnic areas, where the activities are focused on the landscape. Receptors include

residents, tourists / visitors, walkers, cyclists, and horse riders travelling through the landscape.

Medium

People within sports based recreational spaces, local and less well used footpaths or tracks.

Receptors include walkers, cyclists, horse riders, skiers, road users, and rail passengers

travelling through the landscape.

Low

People within non-designated landscapes of lower value or quality. Receptors are likely to

include people at their place of work, or taking part in activities not involving an appreciation of

the landscape and drivers on motorways and other busy trunk roads.

Negligible Generally, not used.

Examples of Visual Magnitude

High A major change or obstruction of a view that may be directly visible, appearing as the dominant

and contrasting feature appearing in the fore or middle ground.

Medium

A prominent change or partial view of a new element within the view that may be readily

noticeable, directly or obliquely visible including glimpsed, partly screened or intermittent views,

appearing as a prominent feature in the middle ground or background landscape.

Low

A noticeable or small level of change, affecting a small part of the view that may be obliquely

viewed or partly screened and/or appearing in the background landscape although noticeable.

May include views experienced whilst travelling at speed.

Negligible

A small or intermittent change to the view that may be obliquely viewed and mostly screened

and/or appearing in the distant background or viewed at high speed over short periods and

capable of being missed by the casual observer.

None There would be no change to the view.

22.4.4 Cumulative Seascape, Landscape and Visual Assessment

71. As there are no similar developments within the Study Area, a cumulative assessment has not been

undertaken in this chapter. The proposed scheme is assessed as one proposed scheme.

22.4.5 Determining the Significance of Effects

72. In accordance with the relevant EIA Regulations it is important to determine whether the predicted

effects, resulting from the proposed scheme, are likely to be significant. Significant landscape and

visual effects are highlighted in bold in the text and in most cases, relate to all those effects that result

in a ‘Substantial’ or a ‘Substantial / Moderate’ effect as indicated in Table 22-7. In some

circumstances, ‘Moderate’ levels of effect also have the potential, subject to the assessor’s opinion,

to be considered as significant and these exceptions are also highlighted in bold and explained as

part of the assessment, where they occur.



Table 22-7 Evaluation of Landscape and Visual Effects

Landscape and Visual Sensitivity

High Medium Low Negligible

Ma

gnitu

de

of

Ch

an

ge

High Substantial Substantial /

Moderate Moderate Slight

Medium Substantial / Moderate Moderate Slight Slight / Negligible

Low Moderate Slight Slight / Negligible Negligible

Negligible Slight Slight / Negligible Negligible Negligible

Zero None / No View

22.4.6 Production of ZTVs and Visualisations

73. Zones of Theoretical Visibility (ZTVs) and annotated visualisations are graphical images produced to

assist and illustrate the seascape, landscape and visual assessment. The methodology used for

viewpoint photography and visualisations broadly accords with the Landscape Institute (2019) Visual

Representation of Development Proposals, Technical Guidance Note, which replaces the 01/11

Advice Note and 02/17 Technical Note.

22.4.6.1 Methodology for Production of ZTVs

74. The ZTV has been calculated using ReSoft Wind Farm © computer software to produce an area of

potential visibility of any part of the proposed scheme. The ZTV has taken into account Ordnance

Survey Digital Surface Model terrain data which takes into account-built development and some

vegetation. These terrain tiles provide a digital record of the existing landform of Great Britain based

on aerial photography derived 2m digital surface model height data representing the specified

geometry and position of the proposed scheme. The computer model includes the central Study Area

and takes account of atmospheric refraction and the Earth's curvature.

75. The resulting ZTV plot is overlaid on Ordnance Survey mapping at an appropriate scale and

presented as figures using desktop publishing / graphic design software.

Methodology for Baseline Photography

76. Once a view has been selected, the location is visited, confirmed, and assessed with the aid of a

wireline or similar visualisation in the field. A photographic record is taken to record the view and the

details of the viewpoint location and associated data are recorded to assist in the production of

visualisations and to validate their accuracy.

77. The following photographic information is recorded:

• Date, time, weather conditions and visual range;

• GPS recorded 12 figure grid reference accurate to ~5-10 m;

• GPS recorded Above Ordnance Datum (AOD) height data;

• Use of a fixed 50 mm focal length lens is confirmed;

• Horizontal field of view (in degrees); and

• Bearing to Target Site.



78. All photographs included in this assessment were recorded with a digital SLR camera set to produce

photographs equivalent to that of a manual 35 mm SLR camera with a fixed 50 mm focal length lens.

79. The photography for the views was taken at high tide and therefore represent a period where there

would be less visibility of some elements of the proposed scheme, most notably The Leug island is

submerged in some of the views.

Methodology for Production of Annotated Visualisations

80. Each view has been annotated to show the extent or position of the proposed scheme and other

existing features. The annotations of the proposed scheme are estimated to reference site features

such as buildings, islands other vertical elements or plot boundaries.

81. Each view is presented as a cylindrical panorama up to 90° FoV at A1 width, as specified in the

template. Except for Viewpoint 4, all other eight viewpoints include a 180° FoV (2x 90° FoV) to

illustrate the full extent of the proposed scheme. Viewpoint 4 includes a 360° FoV (4 x 90° FoV) to

illustrate the full extent of the proposed scheme.

Printing of Maps and Visualisations

82. All electronic visualisations and maps should be printed out and viewed at the correct scale as noted

on the document.

22.4.7 Viewpoint Selection

83. Viewpoint selection was based on viewpoints identified in the Scoping Report (dated 14th March

2017) and are illustrated in Volume II Figure 22-2. As far as possible, viewpoints have been selected

to represent the proposed scheme at its most visible, as experienced by a range of receptor groups,

from varying directions, and over varying distances.

84. A summary of the viewpoints considered as part of the assessment, and the reason for their selection

is provided in Table 22-8. Each of these locations were visited as part of the assessment process.

There were found to be no views of the proposed scheme from Viewpoint 10: Glaid Stone due to

intervening vegetation and landform, and this viewpoint is therefore excluded from further

assessment. Similarly, there were no views of the proposed scheme from the summit of Farland Hill

(Viewpoint 9) and an alternative location was found along the ridgeline to the south between Farland

Hill and Craigengour Hill. In total 9 viewpoints have been illustrated and the viewpoint locations are

illustrated in Volume II Figures 22-6 to 22-14.

Table 22-8 Viewpoint Locations

Viewpoint Receptor Type and Comment

1: Milburn Street

Viewpoint to illustrate site context and view from residential properties, local footpath,

children’s play area, visitors to West Bay, and the local road and recreational route network.

Viewpoint located within the Millport Conservation Area.

2: Crichton Street

Viewpoint to illustrate site context and view from residential properties, visitors to the small

bay and users of recreational routes. Viewpoint located within the Millport Conservation

Area.

3: Clyde Street

(rear view)

Viewpoint to illustrate site context and view from residential properties on Clyde Street.

Viewpoint located within the Millport Conservation Area.



Viewpoint Receptor Type and Comment

4: Millport Pier

Viewpoint from the Millport Pier, to illustrate the view from the pier along the promenade,

and the Eileans within Millport Bay, representative of views for visitors / tourists. Viewpoint

located within the Millport Conservation Area.

5: Stuart Street

Viewpoint on Stuart Street, to illustrate the view from residential properties along the

promenade, tourists / visitors, and the local road and recreational route network. Viewpoint


6: Guildford Street

Viewpoint on Guildford Street to illustrate the view from residential properties along the



7: Glasgow Street

Viewpoint on Glasgow Street to illustrate the view from residential properties along the



8: Kelburn Street

Viewpoint on Kelburn Street to illustrate the view from residential properties along the



9: Ridge between

Farland Hill and

Craigengour Hill

Receptors are likely to include recreational users on a ridge between Farland Hill and

Craigengour Hill.

22.4.8 ZTV Analysis

85. The ZTV pattern (Volume II Figure 22-2) for the proposed scheme reflects the underlying landform

within the 2km Study Area and the percentages of theoretical visibility cover (including and excluding

the sea) are summarised as follows:

• Total ZTV (including the sea) coverage accounts for 36.34% of the 2km Study Area; and

• Total ZTV (excluding the sea) coverage accounts for 6.6% of the 2km Study Area.

86. The ZTV shows limited onshore theoretical visibility within the 2km Study Area. This is due to the

low-lying nature of the proposed scheme in combination with the surrounding built development,

areas of woodland and rising landform around the bay which serve to screen the proposed scheme.

The main theoretical visibility of the proposed scheme is along the Millport foreshore, coastal road,

promenade, and the first row of buildings immediately facing the shore. Inland, theoretical visibility

becomes patchy and is indicated on hill slopes and summits facing the bay at Aird Hill to the west,

Craigengour Hill to the east and Play Hill, Terrach Hill and Gourd Hill to the north. Very patchy

theoretical visibility is also indicated within the settlement away from the coastal edge. Some of these

areas would be further screened by hedgerow planting and garden or roadside trees that are not

picked up by the terrain data.

87. Offshore, theoretical visibility spans across the open expanse of water in the bay and beyond. In

reality, visibility of low-lying features would significantly reduce with distance across the water and

other features of the settlement in the maritime view such as the building massing and colour, the

pier and the cathedral spire are more likely to be visible features – as well as offshore features such

as the Eileans.



22.5 Existing Environment

88. Information on the existing landscape resource or baseline conditions, included in this assessment,

has been collected from local plans, OS maps, and relevant literature as well as information gathered

from field surveys. This baseline information is set out as an inventory of the existing landscape

resource and focuses on those landscape, seascape and visual receptors most likely to be

significantly affected.

89. The baseline inventory is set out as follows:

• Baseline Landscape and Seascape Receptors;

o Landscape and Seascape Character of the proposed scheme;

o Landscape Elements and Features;

o Landscape and Seascape Character of the Surrounding Area; and

o Landscape and Seascape Designations.

• Baseline Visual Receptors;

o Settlements and Residential Properties;

o Transport Routes;

o Recreational Routes;

o Recreational and Tourist Destinations; and

o Maritime receptors.

22.5.1 Baseline Landscape Receptors

90. The landscape receptors in this assessment include the landscape character types and landscape

planning designations identified at a national, regional and local planning level. The landscape

character of the 2km Study Area is classified within the SNH (2019) Landscape Character

Assessment (LCA) and is illustrated in Volume II Figure 22-3.

22.5.1.1 Landscape Character of the Proposed Scheme

91. The 'host' landscape for the proposed scheme is defined as Landscape Character Type (LCT) 61:

Coastal Fringe with Agriculture. This is an extensive LCT which occurs on the southern coasts of

Arran, as well as Great and Little Cumbrae Islands.

92. The key characteristics of the host LCT as described in the SNH (2019) LCA are as follows:

• “Low lying coastal fringes;

• Varied geology with a variety of sedimentary, igneous and metamorphic rocks;

• Agricultural land use with improved pasture and mixed farmland all evident;

• Patterns of broadleaf woodland in this landscape closely reflecting the interplay of topography

and exposure, together with human land uses;

• Contrasting settlement patterns on different islands. Larger settlements within these areas have

experienced considerable growth recently with suburban housing developments pushing along

the coast and uphill;

• Small scale rural character with a fine landscape grain. However, due to their coastal location

they are quite exposed and strongly influenced by changing weather conditions;

• Views tend to be open, longer distance and focused out to sea towards the mainland and

surrounding peninsulas.”



93. Within the Coastal Fringe with Agriculture LCT, Great Cumbrae is further described as: “… quite low

lying, formed by small rounded hills and gently rolling landform which climbs in elevation to Barbay

Hill (127 metres) the central high point of the island. …Of the Cumbraes, Great Cumbrae is larger

and more settled, with much of the island given over to improved pasture and smaller areas (mainly

steeper slopes) under deciduous woodland or heather moorland. … there are dramatic seaward

views of Arran and Little Cumbrae from the west and south-west. It provides a key focus in views

from parts of the North Ayrshire Coast.”1

22.5.1.2 Landscape Elements and Features

94. Landscape elements and features contributing to landscape character at a localised scale in and

around the proposed scheme are described below following on-site observations and desk-based

research and using a combination of mapping and aerial photography.

95. Topography in this area consists of a raised platform around a deeply curved bay at approximately

5m AOD on which most of the settlement of Millport is built. Beyond the platform the landform rises

relatively steeply and is wooded on the steeper slopes to the west and east of the bay. Where the

landform is less steep to the north, there is some elevated residential housing nearer to the bay and

agricultural fields beyond. The foreshore consists of areas of sandy beach, rocky outcrops, jetties

and a pier.

96. Existing elements include a variety of man-made promenade and costal edge elements including

paved walks, benches, sea walls, revetments and expansive linear grassed areas. In general terms,

the area to the east of the proposed scheme is characterised by soft landscape elements such as

expansive linear grassed areas. In contrast, areas to the west are characterised by hard landscape

features such as sea walls, a pier, rock and man-made revetments. Towards the centre of the

proposed scheme, the hard and soft landscape features merge, the expansive, open grassed

elements taper and are interspersed with ‘palm trees’ (Cordyline austrails) near the roadside. The

centre / west of the promenade is characterised by a widened area of hard paving, sea walls,

benches, balustrade, the Millport Cenotaph monument, small areas of grass and crazy golf. Further

west the promenade narrows next to a seawall at Guilford Street and the streetscape elements

intensify around Millport pier. West of the pier is an area of dense development with narrow streets.

Here the coastal edge is less open or accessible and is characterised by a combination of natural

rock with abrupt vertical walls adjacent to buildings. Beyond this point, along Crichton Street and

Millburn Street, the natural coastal rock formation widens, and the coastline becomes more open and

visible with lower walls and balustrading around a small bay (Foul Port). Further west, there is a large

open green space with children’s recreational facilities.

97. Further description of the historical aspects of Millport is found within the Millport Conservation Area

Appraisal and the Millport Conservation Area Management Plan, both published by North Ayrshire

Council in 2013 (North Ayrshire Council, 2013a and 2013b, respectively).

22.5.1.3 Landscape Character of the Surrounding Area

98. There are no other LCTs within the 2km Study Area in addition to the host LCT (61 - Coastal Fringe

with Agriculture) described above.

1 SNH Landscape Character Assessment; Landscape Character Type 61: Coastal Fringe with Agriculture. (https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/landscape/landscape-character-assessment/scottish-landscape-character-types-map-and-descriptions).



22.5.1.4 Landscape Designations

99. There are no nationally designated landscapes within the 2km Study Area. The National Scenic Area

of Kyles of Bute and North Arran is located over 14km south-west of the proposed scheme. No

landscape or visual effect is predicted at this distance, and therefore the National Scenic Area of

Kyles of Bute and North Arran has not been considered any further in this assessment.

100. There are two local landscape designations within 0.5km of the proposed scheme as illustrated in

Volume II Figure 22-4:

• Great Cumbrae Special Landscape Area; and

• Developed Coastal Zone (around the coastal edge of Millport Bay).

101. Effects of the proposed scheme on both designations are considered in Section 22.6.6.

102. Whilst not a landscape designation, part of the proposed scheme is located within the Millport

Conservation Area. Only the landscape and visual effects of the proposed scheme on the

Conservation Area are specially considered in this chapter. The Conservation Area of Millport is

described in detail in the 'Millport Conservation Area Appraisal', published by North Ayrshire Council.

This document provides a general description of the settlement, the historical development of Millport,

a townscape appraisal and a character assessment. Within the townscape appraisal, those areas

specifically relevant to the proposed onshore flood protection works include the 'Open Space' areas

below:

• “War Memorial and Crazy Golf at Guildford Street - the dignity of the Scottish Baronial

Cumbrae War Memorial is undermined by the adjacency of both the Crazy golf course and the

fast food van. The rocky aesthetic of the battery wall protecting the memorial and Crazy Golf

course from the sea has been picked up in the flower beds;

• Strathwherry jetty - historic stone jetty opposite the Garrison that was once used for mooring

the revenue cutter, and in the inert war period used for pleasure and speed boat tours around the

bay;

• Crocodile Rock - rocky outcrop at Newtown Sands painted to resemble a crocodile's mouth by

retired Glaswegian architect Robert Brown in 1913 - it has been repainted in this fashion ever

since;

• The Leck - stone pier amongst rocky outcrop at Newtown Sands;

• Kames Bay esplanade - broad tarmac pavement to the rear of Kames Bay beach and SSSI

bordered by an area of grass. There is a set of toilets at the west end of the esplanade and a

shelter at the mid way point;

• Marine Parade paddling pool at Kames Bay - small concrete lined interwar paddling pool at

the mid-point of Marine Parade;

• Play area and model boat pond at West Bay - a broad area of lawn on what is referred to as

the 25 foot beach. Built into the rocky outcrop fringe to West Bay is a disused interwar concrete

boating pond structure.”



103. These features are also summarised in the 'Key Features' as:

• “Millport Bay and the Eileans - the sea ebbs and flows into the Conservation Area changing the

characteristics of the bay frontage twice a day and creating a natural attractive feature of interest

linking the town with the surrounding landscape and estuary;

• Green Character - The large open lawns of Garrison House and the Cathedral of the Isles, the

mature villa gardens, the promenade and beaches in the foreground and wooded embankment

in the background, all contribute to the special character of the Conservation Area;

• Landscape Setting - the high quality of the surrounding landscape contributes positively to the

visual amenity of the town, providing a scenic approach and should be protected.”

104. Among the recommendations, the Millport Conservation Area Appraisal' states that: “There is a need

to improve the standard of, and better co-ordinate, street surfaces, street furniture and signage in

select locations throughout the Conservation area. The location that would benefit most from

consideration is the Quayhead, a key urban space in the town but which suffers from poor public

realm, location of street furniture and signage. It is also the place most visitors to Millport disembark

from, be it by bus or via the Waverley from the Old Pier…”

105. This is reflected in North Ayrshire's 'Millport Conservation Area Management Plan' which has been

adopted as Supplementary Planning Guidance and states in its strategic objectives that: “CAMP 4.0

Outline proposals for the preservation and enhancement of the wider townscape including

recommendations for upgrading of the streetscape, management of existing planting, and

opportunities for the reintroduction of missing features…”

22.5.2 Baseline Seascape Receptors

106. The seascape character in the Study Area has been classified by the Firth of Clyde Forum in 2010,

in the Firth of Clyde Seascape Assessment, as Upper Firth of Clyde and the Cumbraes Seascape

Area (updated 2013). The overall Seascape Area is extensive and covers the islands of Cumbrae,

the adjacent mainland coast between Cloch Point and Farland Head, the eastern coast of Bute

between Rothesay and Garroch Head and the area between Dunoon and Toward. This expansive

area is further sub-divided into three smaller Coastal Character Areas (CCAs) within the 2km Study

Area as follows:

• Millport;

• Great or Big Cumbrae Island; and

• Little Cumbrae Island.

107. The ZTV illustrates very limited visibility of the proposed scheme from the Great or Big Cumbrae

Island CCA as a whole, whilst visibility from the Little Cumbrae Island CCA would be distant and

would not affect the key characteristics of this character area. These areas are therefore excluded

from further assessment.

108. Part of the proposed scheme is located within the Millport CCA. Effects on this character area are

assessed in Section 22.6.6.

109. The key characteristics of the Millport CCA, as defined in the Firth of Clyde Seascape Assessment

are described in Table 22-9.



Table 22-9 Key Seascape / Landscape and Visual Characteristics2

Characteristic Millport

Maritime influences

and experience from

the sea

Millport is sheltered, but the sandy beach and its rocky exposures are revealed at low tide,

reinforcing a sense of dynamism associated with the sea. The sense of shelter is created

by a few small islands called the Eileans that create a false horizon in Millport bay and by

Wee Cumbrae 1 km to the south.

Maritime

development and

activity

The PS Waverley calls at Millport Pier during the summer, where fishing boats are

moored. Boats moor at buoys in Millport bay, but it is not a suitable anchorage if storms

are forecast from the south or south west. There is a small informal yacht storage yard at

the west end of the bay.

Character and

experience of the

coastline

The resort of Millport is sited on an irregular, partially rocky bay that indents the south

coast of Great Cumbrae. The scattered offshore islands add to the irregularity of the

coast. It is a seaside resort typical of that enjoyed by Victorian trippers going “doon the

watter” from Glasgow. The esplanade and promenade extend behind a sea wall with

railings and steps, overlooking a series of sandy beaches separated by rocky headlands.

Buildings are set back from the shore, partially separated by the road and a mown grass

sward. At the centre of the resort, the sea wall is replaced by fine stone pitching between

the beach and pavement. There are play areas, shelters or pavilions and “the crocodile” (a

painted rock sill) at the beach. Cordyline Australis trees add an exotic touch.

Topography and land

use of hinterland

Millport is set in a bowl behind Millport Bay. There is one golf course, known for its

panoramic views, and a caravan site tucked away behind the town. The island rises

steeply behind the town to enclosed grazing fields and pockets of woodland.

Settlement pattern,

built development

and infrastructure

Millport’s cottages, colourful boarding houses, sandstone terraces and grand villas are set

back from the shore. The town is established on a tight linear grid pattern which extends

parallel to the coast. Large villas have the sunniest west facing sites at the east end of the

beach. Relatively recent development is on low ground inland, out of sight of the sea.

Millport has a stone and timber quay. Built development extends along the coast, almost

merging with a hotel and associated chalets to the west at Doughend Hole.

Setting of landmarks

and features

Painted rocky exposures are a feature of Cumbrae – “the crocodile” at the beach is a local

landmark. Millport’s war memorial is a Mercat cross style Valiant in strife, victors in death,

by the shore.

The slender 37m spire of the smallest cathedral in Britain, the Cathedral of the Argyll and

the Isles (1851), is visible above the trees behind the shore road. “The Garrison” mansion

(1819) stands apart behind the shore road.

Experience of

isolated Coast Millport is urbanised in character, with no experience of isolated or even secluded coast.

Aesthetic qualities

The gentle bustle of this well kept and tidy resort contrasts with the peaceful tranquillity of

the rest of the island, and the wide sandy beach with its sills of rock contrasts with the

rocky coast.

The well known “illuminations” at Millport that mark the end of its season and are a local

attraction.

Visual amenity and

key Viewpoints

Key viewpoints are all along the promenade, esplanade and at the pier which gives more

panoramic views. The tilted terraces, Castle, Old and New Lighthouses of Little Cumbrae

island, together with the serrated skyline of the Isle of Arran, are significant features in

views from the bay, as is the development at Hunterston.

2 Firth of Clyde Seascape Assessment: Section 7 Upper Firth of Clyde & the Cumbraes (2010) page 42.



110. More specifically, Section 7.10 of the report describes Millport: “The town of Millport on Great

Cumbrae is tucked into to the tight curve of a south facing bay enclosed by two headlands overlooking

a number of small islands. The shore is a series of sandy beaches, separated by low rocky sills and

promontories, and the typical promenade of a resort with a large number of ‘dedicated seats’. Islands

in the bay, together with Wee Cumbrae close by, create shelter. The town is a popular holiday resort

known for its illuminations.”3

22.5.3 Baseline Visual Receptors

111. The visual assessment includes those receptors that are overlapped by the ZTV illustrated in Figure

22-5. The objective of the visual assessment is to assess the potential visual effects on views and

visual amenity, which are likely to be experienced by receptors (people) within the landscape, as

follows:

• Views from residential properties and settlements;

• Views experienced whilst travelling through the landscape (road users, walkers, horse riders and

cyclists for example) and seascape (ferry users, anglers for example); and

• Views from tourist and recreational destinations.

112. The ZTV highlights all those areas and receptor locations within the 2km Study Area where the

proposed scheme would be theoretically visible. Nonetheless, the ZTV forms the starting point for

the assessment and the establishment of the baseline visual receptor locations which are to be

included in the assessment.

113. The ZTV and viewpoint analysis indicates that the assessment should be focused on a detailed Study

Area of 0.5km from the proposed scheme. Taking a precautionary approach, and drawing from best

practice guidance, the visual assessment has been focused on all local receptors (settlements, roads

and local recreational routes) within 0.5km. Other receptors within the wider 2km Study Area in the

assessment include receptors of regional or national importance such as Sustrans Cycle Routes, long

distance footpaths and well-known tourist / recreational destinations that are overlapped by the ZTV.

22.5.3.1 Settlements

114. Millport is the only settlement within 0.5km and is included in the assessment. The assessment of

visual effects likely to be experienced from this settlement includes consideration of residential areas

(including local roads within the settlement), the public realm and public open spaces within the

settlement boundaries that would be frequented by people.

22.5.3.2 Transport Routes

115. The visual assessment considers the potential visual effects likely to be experienced by people

travelling through the landscape. Routes that are overlapped by the ZTV within 0.5km of the proposed

scheme have been assessed as comprising:

• B896 which circuits the island.

116. Other roads within the Study Area including the B899 and minor roads between Millport and Barbay

Hill are either outwith the ZTV or have very limited visibility of the proposed scheme and are therefore

excluded from further assessment.

3 Firth of Clyde Seascape Assessment: Section 7 Upper Firth of Clyde & the Cumbraes (2010) page 41.



22.5.3.3 Recreational Routes

117. The visual assessment has considered the potential visual effects likely to be experienced by people

(walkers / cyclists / horse riders / and others) on recreational routes within the Study Area as illustrated

in Figure 22-5.

22.5.3.4 National Recreational Routes

118. There are no national recreational routes within the 2km Study Area.

22.5.3.5 Local Recreational Routes

119. There are a number of locally promoted routes within 0.5km of the proposed scheme that are

overlapped by the ZTV, as illustrated in Figure 22-5.

• Cumbrae Cycle Route 1 (partly overlapped by Core Paths NC1, NC1a, NC2, NC77, NC74 and

NC82);

• Inner Circle Walk (partly overlapped by Cumbrae Cycle Routes 1 and 2 and Core Paths NC2 and

NC86);

• Farland Point Walk (partly overlapped by Cumbrae Cycle Route 1, Core Paths NC1, NC1a, NC2,

NC41, NC77 and NC82, and Inner Circle Walk); and

• Fintry Bay Walk (partly overlapped by Cumbrae Cycle Route 1, Core Paths NC1, NC74 and

Targets Walk).

120. The remaining routes including Cumbrae Cycle Route 2, Core Paths NC44 and NC86 are either

outwith the ZTV or would have very limited visibility of the proposed scheme and are therefore

excluded from further assessment.

22.5.3.6 Recreational & Tourist Destinations

121. The promenade of Millport is the main tourist attraction on the island, with many local attractions and

access to sandy bays.

122. Other key tourist attractions overlapped by the ZTV include Crocodile Rock on the foreshore and

rocky outcrops of Newtown Bay. The remaining attractions are either outwith the ZTV or would have

no visibility of the proposed scheme and are therefore excluded from further assessment.

22.5.3.7 Ferry / Sailing Routes

123. The main route to the island is the ferry from Largs to the north-east of the island. There are no views

of the proposed scheme from this ferry route and is therefore excluded from further assessment.

124. The Paddle Steamer Waverley (P.S. Waverley) ferries passengers to Cumbrae on a seasonal basis.

At the time of writing, this vessel was out of service for repair but historically the service ferried

passengers from various locations including Glasgow, Largs and Ayr to the pier in Millport bay. More

recent crossings have been to Keppel Pier to the south-east of Millport. This route has been

considered in the assessment as a precaution.

125. Private yachts and other small vessels are also used recreationally in the waters around Millport Bay.

Users of these receptors are also considered in the assessment.



22.6 Impact Assessment

22.6.1 Overview of Potential Impacts

126. Following the methodology presented in Section 22.4 above, the impacts associated with the

landscape, seascape and visual receptors described in Section 22.5 have been assessed and are

presented in this section. Where measures over and above the embedded mitigation described in

Section 22.6.2 are required to avoid, reduce, remedy/compensate or enhance the adverse impacts

of the proposed scheme, this information has been provided.

22.6.2 Embedded Mitigation

22.6.3 Landscape Design Considerations

127. The landscape design and evolution of the proposed scheme has been presented here as an

overview of the ‘landscape design considerations’ which should be read in conjunction with Chapter

4 Site Selection and Assessment of Alternatives and the Design Statement which is provided as

Appendix 22.1, which set out the design evolution from a wider environmental and technical

perspective.

22.6.3.1 Design Considerations in relation to Guidance for Development in Millport

128. The opportunities and design guidance for development in the Firth of Clyde Seascape Assessment,

Section 7: Upper Firth of Clyde & The Cumbraes (2010) have been reviewed and considered in the

design evolution and assessment process of the proposed scheme as set out in Table 22-10.

Table 22-10 Consideration of Design Opportunities

Opportunities and Design Guidance Design Consideration of the proposed scheme

There is a risk that additional land

based development will add ribbon

development to Millport, therefore size,

massing, design and setting of any

additional development should aim to

work closely with established patterns

of development

The proposed scheme would add low-lying linear elements into the

existing streetscape along the promenade and would upgrade existing

sea-defence walls. These elements are designed to be unobtrusive and

to blend with the existing streetscape elements. Care will be taken with

colour and materials to ensure that they blend with existing features.

These elements would not add to the existing urban massing in Millport.

Development should be resisted

between the road and the coast

wherever possible, to limit impacts on

views of the sea

Visibility and views have been a key consideration in the development of

the proposed scheme. The design seeks to reduce the visual effects of

new wall elements in views from the road by raising the level of open

grassland between them and the road to screen them, where possible.

Linear walls are also designed to function as seating elements where

possible to further integrate and provide familiar elements into the views.

Views to the Eileans in the bay, to Little

Cumbrae, and to Arran, are a particular

feature of this stretch of coast, and

should be considered in the siting of off

shore structures

The low-lying nature of the proposed walls and terraces mean that they

do not affect existing views towards the Eileans, to Little Cumbrae, and

Arran. The walls are also designed to act as seating elements to

encourage the enjoyment of the views. The proposed offshore

breakwater is also designed using natural rock which would emulate

existing rock features offshore such as the Spoig, the Leug and other

rock outcrops.

It is important to restore, maintain,

enhance and upgrade where

necessary, the quality of the built

structures and infrastructure – including

The ethos of the proposed scheme is to restore and maintain existing

elements where possible and to enhance them to further protect Millport

from flood events. This is particularly the case with the refurbishment of

the existing concrete crest wall along Stuart Street and the enhancement



Opportunities and Design Guidance Design Consideration of the proposed scheme

paving, railings, street furniture, and the

paddling pool and boating pond – and

the distinctive planting, such as the

cordyline trees, to consolidate the

impression of a high quality resort and

‘seaside’ atmosphere

of existing sea walls along West Bay Road and Marine Parade. In some

places existing features such as benches would be replaced by linear

seating that also acts as flood wall. The Cordyline trees would be

retained in the design and there are proposals to add further trees to

further enhance these existing features. Overall the impression of a high

quality resort and ‘seaside atmosphere’ would be retained and

enhanced.

Care should be taken to avoid adding

additional clutter or fragmenting the

grass frontage to allow the promenade

and the grass frontage to dominate and

unify the front.

The proposed scheme is designed to minimise visual clutter with the

introduction of linear elements that integrate with existing features. The

repetition of these elements around the bay provide a sense of unity and

continuity.

22.6.4 Elements of the Proposed Scheme

129. A summary of the elements of the proposed scheme is provided below with the complete project

description of the proposed scheme provided in Chapter 5 Project Description.

• Proposed Onshore Flood Protection Works:

o Improvements to existing sea walls including seating;

o Flood walls;

o Increased ground levels to include grassed areas;

o Stepped revetments doubling as terraced seating;

o Improvements to other defence structures; and

o Works on the foreshore including a shore connected rock armour breakwater and rock

armour revetment.

• Proposed Offshore Flood Protection Works:

o Offshore breakwater.

22.6.5 Mitigation during the Construction Period

130. The total construction period (for any of the options) is estimated to be up to 21 months, commencing

in Autumn 2021. Ongoing consultation would seek to minimise the disruption caused to the local

community through noise, traffic, air quality and tourism activities during the construction process.

Specific construction effects are likely to be:

• Barge delivery of materials required for construction of the offshore works, to help minimise the

effects of use of Largs ferry and delivery vehicles on the B896 / B899;

• Dredging and dredged material removal, if required, with options to reuse dredged materials

locally being explored to avoid potential landscape / seascape effects elsewhere;

• Excavation of the existing footpath along Marine Parade and West Bay Road would require

fencing, a site compound for the construction plant and materials. Road closures would be

minimised to reduce disruption;

• Flood walls would be constructed from reinforced concrete. The concrete would be coloured

based on samples of the local beach material this would integrate the walls with existing

landscape and seascape elements;

• Proposed flood walls are designed to be used as seating where possible to integrate them into

the townscape;



• A search would be undertaken for existing buried services in the working footprint and if

necessary, services would be diverted to minimise potential extended disruption;

• Between Clifton Street and College Street – excavation of paved area width of 2m is expected to

be required. Some footpath excavation and reinstatement would be required as part of the

construction activities. An additional working area of up to 5m either side of the wall may be

required by construction vehicles. It is expected that the construction of this flood wall would be

undertaken within the existing footpath. Closure of the adjacent road may be necessary on

occasions, but would be minimised;

• Glasgow Street (Crocodile Jetty to Kelburn Street - Cross House) - Potential breakout of bedrock

at Cross House, excavation and reinstatement of the promenade around proposed wall. An

additional working area of up to 5m either side of the wall may be required by construction

vehicles. Construction of the flood wall in this area is unlikely to require road closures;

• Crichton Street - The flood wall would be founded on top of the exposed natural rock. This may

require excavation of parts of the existing masonry revetment. Excavation and reinstatement of

the footpath would also be required. An additional working area of up to 5m either side of the

wall may be required by construction vehicles, therefore road closures would be required during

the construction works along Crichton Street;

• Increase ground levels - All activities would be undertaken from land. It is unlikely that road

closures would be needed for these works, although access along footpaths may be restricted at

times. Materials for the ground raising works would be delivered by barge to minimise disruption

on roads and on the Largs ferry. Fencing would be erected around the works area, and a site

compound would be required for storage of plant and materials;

• Revetment works - Construction activities would be undertaken from the landward and seaward

side of the existing coast protection structures. These improvement works may require

excavation of the beach adjacent to the existing structures, to a depth of up to 2m over a width of

up to 5m. Some footpath excavation and reinstatement would also be required as part of the

construction process. Fencing would be erected around the works area, and a site compound will

be required for storage of plant and materials;

• Shore connected rock armour breakwater - The rock for the breakwaters would be delivered by

sea. This would reduce the potential impact on local roads and the Largs ferry route. A fenced

site compound would be required for the construction plant and materials; and

• Construction working hours would be based on core working hours (08:00 hrs to 18:00hrs,

Saturday – 08:00 hrs to 13:00hrs). This would minimise local visual disruption and potential visual

impact from night time lighting (although it is acknowledged that whilst unlikely, there may need

to be short periods of night working for the offshore construction works, e.g. to minimise risks

associated with expected bad weather).

22.6.6 Residual Landscape Effects

131. As described in the Methodology in Section 22.4, landscape effects are assessed by considering the

landscape sensitivity (value and susceptibility) against the magnitude of change. The parts of the

proposed scheme that are likely to affect landscape character and landscape designations would be

the proposed onshore flood protection works. The proposed offshore flood protection works are

unlikely to affect landscape character or designations but may affect seascape character which is

assessed further below.

132. The residual landscape effects assessed here are those effects remaining after all of the embedded

design mitigation and enhancement measures referred to in Section 22.6 have been taken into

account.



22.6.6.1 Effects on Landscape Elements and Landscape Character

133. Landscape character within the Study Area is illustrated in Figure 22-3. The 'host' landscape for the

proposed onshore flood protection works is an extensive area of Coastal Fringe with Agriculture LCT

which extends across the Greater Cumbrae, Little Cumbrae, and the southern part of Arran.

Landscape Sensitivity of the Proposed Onshore Flood Protection Works on the Coastal Fringe with

Agriculture LCT

134. The landscape assessment has been undertaken in accordance with GLVIA 3 and the methodology,

Section 22.4 and glossary. The glossary defines the terms landscape sensitivity and capacity as

follows:

• "Landscape Sensitivity: The sensitivity of the landscape to a particular development considers

the susceptibility of the landscape and its value; and

• Landscape Capacity: The ability of a landscape to accommodate different amounts of change or

development of a specific type. Capacity reflects the landscape's sensitivity to the type of change,

and the value attached to the landscape, and is therefore dependent on judgements about the

desirability of retaining landscape characteristics and the acceptability of their loss."

135. The value of the local landscape elements and the Coastal Fringe with Agriculture LCT within the

2km Study Area is Medium to High, reflecting the Great Cumbrae SLA, Millport Conservation Area

and Coastal Zone designations that partly overlap with the LCT. The susceptibility to change from the

proposed onshore flood protection works of the proposed scheme is assessed as Low since the works

would be of relatively small scale across the overall LCT and would not introduce large scale,

unfamiliar elements. The sensitivity to change is therefore assessed as Medium to Low.

Magnitude and Level of Effect on Landscape Elements and the Coastal Fringe with Agriculture LCT

During Construction

136. The construction phase would result in localised, direct landscape effects on the landscape character

of the proposed onshore flood protection works and its component landscape elements.

137. Table 22-11 provides an assessment of the level and type of landscape effect predicted in respect of

each construction activity.

Table 22-11 Construction Effects (Landscape) of the Proposed Onshore Flood Protection Works

Proposed Works Assessment

Sea Walls / Sea Wall

Seating, Terrace

Seating and

Increased Ground

Levels

The construction and refurbishment of the proposed linear sea walls, sea wall seating,

terraced seating and increased level of existing grassed areas would affect relatively

small strips of the overall Coastal Fringe with Agriculture LCT. Localised areas would

be closed for construction and there would be fencing, earthworks, construction plant

and delivery vehicles. There would be some alterations and additions to the existing

elements such as linear walls that would double as seating and a re-grading of grassed

areas. The magnitude of change would range from High at the start of construction,

reducing to Low-Negligible towards the end of construction as re-seeding establishes,

such that the level of effect on landscape elements (paving, benches and grassland)

would range from Substantial / Moderate and Significant to Slight and Negligible and

Not Significant.

In terms of landscape character, the construction activity would only affect a very small

area of landscape character along Millport Bay. The magnitude of change would range

from High during peak construction through to Zero at the end of the construction

period. The effects would therefore range from Substantial / Moderate and Significant




to Negligible and Not Significant. The nature of these effects would be temporary,

direct and negative.

Shore Connected

Rock Armour

Breakwater, Rock

Revetment and

Offshore Breakwater

The effects of the shore connected rock armour breakwater, rock revetment and

Offshore Breakwater on landscape elements and landscape character would be

Negligible and Not Significant (Negligible magnitude) and would involve disturbance of

existing elements due to delivery of materials and visibility in views out from the bay.

The effects on seascape and visual receptors is considered below in Sections 22.6.7

and 22.6.8.

Magnitude and Level of Effect on Landscape Elements and the Coastal Fringe with Agriculture LCT

During Operation

138. The main landscape elements affected by the proposed onshore flood protection works are the

expansive grass elements which would be reformed / re-graded to increase the ground levels and

would include, in places, sections of linear seating acting as a flood defence wall or terraced seating

at the seaward side. There would also be changes to the areas of the foreshore where terraced

seating would be introduced and existing seawalls are refaced or upgraded with a low increase in

height. Although some of the elements would change, there would not be an overall change in the

use or perception of the promenade area and an overall enhancement of seating and paved areas

along the promenade. This would result in an overall Medium magnitude of change and a Moderate

and Not Significant effect. The nature of these effects would be permanent, direct, and neutral to

positive.

Magnitude and Level of Effect: Coastal Fringe with Agriculture LCT During Operation

139. At the end of the construction period and during operation, the proposed onshore flood protection

works would gain a more ‘settled’ appearance when compared to the same area at the start and

during the construction period.

140. The proposed onshore flood protection works would introduce slight alterations to landform and linear

seating in a small area of the overall LCT. These alterations would be low lying and would not change

the character of the area or affect any of the key characteristics of the Coastal Fringe with Agriculture

LCT either locally or overall. The changes in the landscape would mainly be visible at close proximity

and would range from Low to Negligible magnitude of change to Zero in the wider LCT area. The

landscape character effects on the Coastal Fringe with Agriculture LCT (Medium to Low landscape

sensitivity) would range from Slight to Slight / Negligible and Not Significant within close proximity

to Negligible to None and Not Significant in the wider area of the Coastal Fringe with Agriculture

LCT. The nature of these effects would be permanent, direct, and neutral to positive.

22.6.6.2 Effects on Landscape Designations

Great Cumbrae Special Landscape Area (SLA)

141. The Great Cumbrae SLA covers the island of Great Cumbrae with the exception of the urban

settlement of Millport. The SLA covers a variety of localised features both inland and along the coastal

fringe and seascape and includes elevated parts of the Eileans. The SLA starts at the urban edge of

the settlement of Millport and at its closest point would be within approximately 100m of the proposed

onshore flood protection works on the rising landform to the eastern and western edges of Millport

Bay. The proposed scheme would also introduce an offshore breakwater, which would terminate at

the southern Eilean island. The SLA designation is illustrated in Figure 22-4. No details of the special

or valued qualities of the Great Cumbrae as a Special Landscape Area were available at the time of

assessment.



142. As a local landscape designation, not of the highest or national level, the value of the SLA is High to

Medium and the susceptibility of change to the proposed onshore flood protection works is assessed

as Low. The overall sensitivity is therefore assessed as Medium.

143. There would be no direct landscape effects arising from the proposed onshore flood protection works

on the SLA. The ZTV coverage of this area is partly fragmented and largely focused on hill slopes

surrounding the settlement of Millport and on the offshore island of the Eileans. The magnitude of

change on the Great Cumbrae SLA would therefore be Low to Zero. The majority of the SLA lies

outwith the ZTV and is some distance from the proposed onshore flood protection works. The effect

on the Great Cumbrae SLA would therefore be Slight to None and Not Significant. The nature of

these effects would be permanent, indirect and neutral.

Millport Conservation Area

144. Although the Millport Conservation Area designation relates to the cultural heritage of Millport, it also

describes ‘Key Features’ and ‘Open Elements’ which highlight scenic townscape qualities. The value

of the Conservation Area is High. The susceptibility of change to the proposed onshore flood

protection works is assessed as Low. The overall sensitivity is therefore assessed as High-Medium.

145. The setting of the Millport Conservation Area is assessed in Chapter 15 Archaeology and Cultural

Heritage. The landscape and visual effects on the relevant 'Open Space' elements and 'Key

Features' of the Conservation Area are addressed below.

• War Memorial (Millport Cenotaph) and Crazy Golf at Guildford Street. Parts of the proposed

scheme would be visible from this area of the promenade. There would be no direct effects. The

magnitude of change would be Low;

• Strathwherry jetty. Parts of the proposed scheme would be visible from this area of the

promenade. There would be no direct effects. The magnitude of change would be Low;

• Crocodile Rock. There would be no direct effects. The magnitude of change would be Low to

Negligible;

• The Leck. There would be upgrades and repair to the jetties at either side of The Leck. There

would be no direct effects. The magnitude of change would be Low to Negligible;

• Kames Bay esplanade. This area would be enhanced as part of the proposed scheme. There

would be an increase in ground level in this area such that the area of grassland would be re-

graded near to the coastal edge and stepped revetments acting as terraced seating would be

added. This would not change the character of the area or the use of the promenade in this

location and the magnitude of change would be Low;

• Marine Parade paddling pool at Kames Bay. Parts of the proposed scheme would be visible

from this area. There would be no direct effects. The magnitude of change would be Negligible;

• Play area and model boat pond at West Bay. Parts of the proposed scheme would be visible

from this area. There would be no direct effects. The magnitude of change would be Negligible;

• Millport Bay and the Eileans – There would be No Change to the main characteristic of the sea

ebbing and flowing into the Conservation Area. The magnitude of change would be Negligible;

• Green Character - The proposed scheme would introduce elements to the promenade including

sections of low-lying flood wall that would double as seating. Some of the flood wall would be on

the seaward side of a slight increase in ground level where it adjoins open grassland. Stepped

revetments would also act as areas of terraced seating onto the foreshore in some locations. The

magnitude of change would be Low; and

• Landscape Setting - The proposed scheme would continue to introduce high-quality elements

to the promenade and retain and enhance the visual amenity of the town and its scenic approach.

The magnitude of change would be Low.



146. It is noted that within the recommendations, the ‘Millport Conservation Area Appraisal' states that:

“There is a need to improve the standard of, and better co-ordinate, street surfaces, street furniture

and signage in select locations throughout the Conservation area…”

147. The proposed scheme addresses this recommendation with increased cohesion of elements across

the middle and eastern edges of the bay and the area around Foul Port to the west of the bay.

148. In summary, the magnitude of change on the ‘Open Space’ elements and ‘Key Features’ of the

Conservation Area would be Low to Negligible, to Zero resulting in an overall Slight and Not

Significant effect. The nature of these effects would be permanent, indirect, and neutral to positive.

Coastal Zone

149. The proposed scheme is located within the ‘Developed’ Coastal Zone which is guided by the Coastal

Design Guidance published by North Ayrshire Council. The design of the proposed scheme has

taken the recommended design solutions from this guidance into account, as described in Chapter

4 Site Selection and Alternatives, Chapter 5 Project Description and the Appendix 22.1

Landscape Design and Access Statement.

150. The designated area of the ‘Developed’ Coastal Zone overlaps with the same boundary and features

as the Millport Coastal Character Area and is therefore assessed as part of the CCA below in Section

22.6.

22.6.7 Residual Seascape Effects

151. As described in the Methodology in Section 22.2, seascape effects are assessed by considering the

seascape sensitivity (value and susceptibility) against the magnitude of change. The parts of the

proposed scheme that are likely to affect seascape character include both the proposed onshore flood

protection works and the proposed offshore flood protection works.

152. The residual seascape effects assessed here are those effects remaining after all of the embedded

design mitigation and enhancement measures referred to in Section 22.4 have been taken into

account.

22.6.7.1 Effects on Seascape Character

153. Seascape character within the Study Area is illustrated in Figure 22-3. As described in Section 22.5,

Millport CCA is considered in the assessment below.

Seascape Sensitivity of the Proposed Scheme on the Millport Coastal Character Area

154. The seascape assessment has been undertaken in accordance with GLVIA 3 and the SNH Guidance

Note: Coastal Character Assessment (2018). The SNH Guidance states that: “The process of coastal

character assessment is similar to that for landscape character assessment…

155. The process of coastal character assessment is principally concerned with identifying, recording and

describing the baseline landscape and visual conditions. Making judgments, for example on coastal

sensitivity or the significance of any change to the baseline is a separate task.”

156. The GLVIA 3 glossary defines the term ‘sensitivity’ as follows: “Sensitivity: A term applied to specific

receptors, combining judgements of the susceptibility of the receptor to the specific type of change or

development proposed and the value of that receptor.”



157. The value of the Millport CCA within the 2km Study Area is Medium to High, reflecting the Great

Cumbrae SLA, Millport Conservation Area and Coastal Zone designations. The susceptibility to

change from the proposed scheme is assessed as Medium to Low since the proposed scheme would

not introduce unfamiliar onshore and foreshore elements but would introduce new elements into parts

of the offshore seascape. The sensitivity to change is therefore assessed as Medium.

Magnitude and Level of Effect on the Millport CCA During Construction

158. The main characteristics affected by the proposed scheme on the Millport CCA would be the maritime

experience from the sea where various elements of the proposed construction works would be visible,

albeit in the context of an often-busy townscape.

159. The proposed shore connected rock breakwater and rock revetment be constructed using a raised

platform from the beach and would be a visible element near to the shore. The magnitude of change

on these elements would be High. This would result in a Substantial / Moderate and Not Significant

effect.

160. Construction activity associated with the proposed offshore breakwater is expected to include

dredging vessels, delivery barges and restricted access to this area of the bay. These would

introduce direct effects and would be the most visible elements from this CCA, influencing the

maritime experience in this part of the bay. The magnitude of change would be High in relation to

maritime activity resulting in a Substantial / Moderate and Significant effect.

161. The character and experience of the coastline would be influenced by the introduction of new linear

flood walls which would double as seating elements, stepped revetments which would double as

terraced seating. Increased ground levels would integrate the flood walls in places and would be

most visible from the promenade. During construction, areas of the promenade and foreshore would

be closed with fencing, and there would be earthworks and construction vehicles and activity. There

would be newly grassed areas following construction and a period of time before the establishment

of vegetation. Existing sea walls would be increased in height around Foul Port and Marine Parade.

Construction activity would be in the context of a busy urban area with existing vehicular and

pedestrian activity. There would be some road closures and some footpath excavation which would

restrict access in places. The magnitude of change would range from High at the start of construction,

reducing to Low towards the end of construction, such that the level of effect on the character and

experience of the coastline would be Substantial / Moderate and Significant to Slight and Not

Significant.

162. Construction activity near landmarks and features would be minimal. Access to the majority of the

features would be unaffected during the works, the exception would be the Crocodile Rock where

access may be restricted for short periods due to construction works to the foreshore. The overall

magnitude of change would be Low to Negligible resulting in a Slight to Negligible and Not

Significant effect.

163. The nature of these effects on the Millport CCA would be temporary, direct, and negative to neutral

during construction.

164. There would be no construction effects on the other key characteristics of the Millport CCA including

the Maritime development and activity, topography and land use of hinterland, settlement pattern,

experience of isolated coast and the aesthetic qualities.



Magnitude and Level of Effect on the Millport CCA During Operation

165. The effects of the proposed scheme on the Millport CCA have been considered in relation to each of

the key characteristics in Table 22-12.

Table 22-12 Consideration of proposed scheme against key characteristics of the Millport CCA.

Characteristic Assessment Magnitude of Change

Maritime

influences and

experience from

the sea

The proposed scheme would add rock armour revetments to a

small area of the exposed rock at Bessy’s Port. There would

also be a shore connected rock armour breakwater to the west

of the revetment and a proposed offshore breakwater between

the Leug, the Spoig and the southern island of the Eileans.

Low (proposed onshore

flood protection works)

High (proposed offshore

flood protection works)

Maritime

development and

activity

There would be no change to the maritime development and

activity as a result of the proposed scheme.

Negligible

Character and

experience of the

coastline

The proposed scheme would introduce some new low lying

elements to the esplanade and promenade comprising new

linear flood walls which would double as seating elements,

stepped revetments which would double as terraced seating,

increased ground levels and increased height of existing sea

walls to the west and east of Millport Bay. Rock armour

revetments would also be visible in areas to the west of the

bay and a shore connected rock armour breakwater would

also be introduced in this area. The promenade, beaches, rock

headlands and other features on the coastline would remain

unchanged.

Low

Topography and

land use of

hinterland

There would be no change to the topography and land use of

the hinterland as a result of the proposed scheme.

Negligible

Settlement

pattern, built

development and

infrastructure

There would be no change to the settlement pattern and built

infrastructure as a result of the proposed scheme.

Negligible

Setting of

landmarks and

features

There would be no change to the setting of landmarks and

features from the introduction of the proposed scheme. The

introduction of a linear flood wall / seating to the east and

refacing of an existing wall to the west may have a slight

influence on the setting of the Millport Cenotaph.

Low to Negligible

Experience of

isolated Coast

There would be no change to the experience of isolated coast

as a result of the proposed scheme.

Negligible

Aesthetic

qualities

There would be no change to the aesthetic qualities as a

result of the proposed scheme.

Negligible

Visual amenity

and key

Viewpoints

Whilst the proposed offshore breakwater would be visible in

some views, particularly at low tide, there would be no

change to the panoramic views experienced from the key

viewpoints as a result of the proposed scheme. The tilted

terraces, Castle, Old and New Lighthouses of Little Cumbrae

island, together with the serrated skyline of the Isle of Arran

Low to Negligible



Characteristic Assessment Magnitude of Change

would be unaffected by the proposed scheme as illustrated in

viewpoints 1-9, Figures 22-6 to 22-14.

166. As assessed in Table 22-8, the main characteristics affected by the proposed scheme would be the

maritime experience from the sea, where various elements of the proposed onshore and offshore

flood protection works would be visible, albeit in the context of an often busy townscape. These would

include onshore works such as linear flood walls which would double as seating elements, stepped

revetments which would double as terraced seating, increased ground levels and increased height of

existing sea walls to the west and east of Millport Bay. Rock armour revetments would also be visible

in areas to the west of the bay and a shore connected rock armour breakwater would also be

introduced in this area. The magnitude of change from these elements would be Low to Negligible,

to Zero resulting in a Slight to None and Not Significant effect. The nature of these effects would be

permanent, indirect, and neutral. The proposed offshore breakwater would be most visible from this

area and maritime activity around the Eileans, The Spoig and The Leug would be affected. The

magnitude of change would be High in relation to maritime activity, resulting in a Substantial /

Moderate and Significant effect.

167. The character and experience of the coastline would be influenced by the introduction of new linear

flood walls which would double as seating elements, stepped revetments which would double as

terraced seating and increased ground levels which would accommodate the flood walls on the

seaward side of grassed areas. This would not change the character of the area which would still

retain the “esplanade and promenade … series of sandy beaches separated by rocky headlands…

buildings set back from the shore, partially separated by the road…mown grass sward…play areas,

shelters or pavilions and “the crocodile”’. It is anticipated that the proposed new elements would

improve the quality of the environment and provide a sense of cohesion to the experience of the area.

The magnitude of change would be Low resulting in a Moderate / Slight and Not Significant effect.

168. The proposed scheme would be visible from landmarks and features and would provide some of the

indirect visual context to them. The magnitude of change would be Low to Negligible resulting in a

Slight to Negligible and Not Significant effect.

169. It is anticipated that the effects on the visual amenity and key viewpoints of the Millport CCA would

not be compromised by the proposed scheme. The proposed offshore breakwater would be visible

in some views but would not alter the main features of the views from the bay. The magnitude of

change would be Low to Negligible resulting in a Slight to Negligible and Not Significant effect.

170. The nature of these effects on the Millport CCA would be permanent, direct, and neutral to positive.

171. In summary, whilst there would be significant effects in relation to maritime activity due to the

proposed offshore breakwater, effects on the majority of seascape characteristics result in either

Slight or Negligible effects, resulting in positive changes from the introduction of increased seating,

foreshore access and cohesion.

22.6.8 Residual Visual Effects

172. Visual effects are assessed by considering the sensitivity of the receptor (people in the landscape)

and the magnitude of change that would affect the view or overall visual amenity. They are defined

by the Landscape Institute in GLVIA 3, paragraphs 6.2 as follows.



173. “An assessment of visual effects deals with the effects of change and development on the views

available to people and their visual amenity. The concern here is with assessing how the surroundings

of individuals or groups of people may be specifically affected by changes in the content and character

of views as a result of the change or loss of existing elements of the landscape and/or introduction of

new elements.”

174. The type of effect may also be described as temporary or permanent, direct or indirect, and positive,

neutral, or negative.

175. The residual visual effects assessed here are those effects remaining after all of the embedded design

mitigation and enhancement measures have been taken into account.

176. The visual assessment has been set out as follows:

• Overview of Visual Effects during Construction;

• Overview of Visual Effects during Operation;

o Viewpoint Analysis;

o Visual Effects on Views from Settlements;

o Visual Effects on Views from Transport Routes;

o Visual Effects on Views from Recreational Routes;

o Visual Effects on Views from Recreational and Tourist Destinations; and

o Visual Effects on Views from Ferry / Sailing Routes.

177. Visualisations illustrating the extent of the proposed scheme are provided from nine viewpoint

locations and illustrated in Figures 22-2 and 22-6 to 22-14. Each of the viewpoints are assessed

below in

178. Table 22-13.

22.6.8.1 Visual Effects During Construction

179. Views of construction activity would include construction traffic at the site entrances as well as vehicle

and crane movement and the erection of the various elements on site. Ground level construction

activities at the temporary construction compounds and storage areas would tend to be screened by

fencing or otherwise partially visible from more limited areas. Areas of amenity grassland would be

re-graded to increase ground levels as part of the construction works. New linear flood walls and

stepped revetments would be added along the promenade and foreshore and would double as

seating, and rock armour revetments and a shore connected rock armour breakwater will be added

on the foreshore.

180. In general terms, visual effects associated with the construction phase would decrease from High at

the start of construction, until they are at the same levels as those predicted once construction of the

proposed scheme has completed and is in operation. Each of the component parts of the proposed

scheme have been assessed in

181. Table 22-13 in terms of the potential for residual visual effects where there may be some opportunity

to view the component parts of the proposed scheme.

Table 22-13 Construction Effects (Visual) of the Proposed scheme




Improvements to

Existing Sea Walls

Views of the proposed improvements to the existing sea walls would be available from

small parts of the settlement of Millport, particularly from those properties facing Foul

Port to the west and those along Marine Parade to the east. Sections of the B896,

Cumbrae Cycle Route 1 and Core Paths NC 74, NC82, NC 1a and Farland Point Walk

would also gain views of the works. Parts of the Core Path routes would be closed and

diverted during construction works which would involve excavating the footpaths. The

magnitude of change would range from High at the start of construction, reducing to Low-

Negligible towards the end of construction, such that the level of effect would be

Substantial and Significant to Slight and Not Significant. The nature of these effects

would be temporary, direct and negative, altering to neutral / positive post works.

Flood Walls /

Seating, Stepped

Revetments /

Terraced Seating,

and Increased

Ground Levels

Views of the proposed flood walls / stepped revetments / terraced seating and increased

ground levels would be available from a small part of the settlement of Millport,

particularly from those properties facing the bay and promenade. Sections of the B896,

Cumbrae Cycle Route 1, Core Paths NC 1a, 2, 77 and 74 and locally promoted routes

would also gain views of these works. Small sections of these routes may be temporarily

inaccessible during construction works and necessary diversions would be in place. The

magnitude of change would range from High at the start of construction, reducing to Low-

Negligible towards the end of construction as re-seeding and replanting establishes,

such that the level of effect would be Substantial and Significant to Slight and Not

Significant. The nature of these effects would be temporary, direct and negative, altering

to neutral / positive post works.

Rock Breakwater

and Rock

Revetment

Views of the proposed shore connected rock armour breakwater and rock armour

revetment works would be available from a small part of the settlement of Millport,

particularly from those properties facing Foul Port. Sections of the B896, Cumbrae Cycle

Route 1 and Core Path NC 74 would also gain views of the works. The magnitude of

change would range from High at the start of construction, reducing to Low-Negligible

towards the end of construction, such that the level of effect would be Substantial and

Significant to Slight and Not Significant. The nature of these effects would be temporary,

direct and negative, altering to neutral / positive post works.

Offshore

Breakwater

Views of the proposed offshore breakwater would be available from a small part of the

settlement of Millport, particularly from those properties facing the bay and promenade.

Sections of the B896, Cumbrae Cycle Route 1, Core Paths NC 1a, 2, 77 and 74, Farland

Point and Targets Walk would also gain views of the works. Recreational boat users in

the bay would also experience views of the proposed works. The magnitude of change

would range from High at the start of construction, reducing overall to Medium towards

the end of construction, such that the level of effect would be Substantial to Substantial /

Moderate and Significant. The nature of these effects would be temporary, direct and

negative, altering to neutral / positive post works.

22.6.8.2 Viewpoint Analysis

The viewpoint analysis has been conducted from nine viewpoint locations as illustrated in Figures 22-6 to

22-14. The photography for the views was taken at high tide and therefore represents a period where there

would be less visibility of some elements of the proposed scheme, most notably The Leug island is

submerged in some of the views.

Table 22-14 Viewpoint Analysis – Millburn Street

Figure 22-6 a-b Viewpoint 1: Millburn Street

The assessment takes account of a 180° angle of view from this location as illustrated.

Description This viewpoint is located on West Bay Road adjacent to a children’s recreational area and

residential properties. The view looks east across a small bay (Foul Port) towards the



Figure 22-6 a-b Viewpoint 1: Millburn Street


Millport townscape and south-east across the bay towards the mainland. To the east (Figure

22-6a), Millburn Street runs along a rocky promontory at the far side of the bay. Residential

properties are located on the promontory and form the main focal point in views in this

direction. To the south-east (Figure 22-6b) the view is across the wider bay (Millport Bay)

towards the mainland. The main focal point in this view is Hunterston Power Station.

Although the mainland is visible, it merges with the townscape and the eastern edge of the

bay at Farland Point. In the mid-ground of the view in this direction, rocky outcrops taper into

the sea where Milton Street terminates and the small island of Spoig is visible in the Bay

beyond. On the far right of the view, a paddling pool forms another man-made feature.

Sensitivity The viewpoint is located within the Millport Conservation area and is in a location with

benches where people are encouraged to look at the view across the bay. It is also

representative of views from residential properties along West Bay Road. The value of the

viewpoint is considered to be High and the susceptibility to change from the introduction of

the proposed scheme is considered to be High to Medium. The sensitivity to change is

therefore assessed as High.

Magnitude of

Change (under

Construction)

During construction there would be fencing around the walls, delivery vehicles, potential site

storage areas and construction vehicles and activity in the view. The footpath along West

Bay Road would be excavated. A temporary working platform would be built on the

foreshore for the construction of the breakwater and there would be construction machinery

placing large rocks. The magnitude of change would be High to Medium.

Magnitude of

Change (Whilst

in Operation)

The proposed scheme would introduce a new wall that would replace existing concrete

fencing along West Bay Road to the left of the view. The existing access ramp would be

replaced with a longer ramp, with rock armour protection on the seaward side. A further wall

would be visible facing the viewer along the southern part of Millburn Street across the bay.

This wall would upgrade the existing wall and continue south, terminating before the rocky

outcrops. The proposed shore connected rock armour breakwater and offshore breakwater

would also be visible to the southeast of the view. None of these elements would be

prominent new features in the view, but they would be noticeable as small changes in these

wide and open views. The magnitude of change would be Low.

Assessment Sensitivity High

Magnitude High to Medium (construction)

Low (operation)

Level of Effect Substantial to Substantial / Moderate and Significant (construction)

Moderate and Not Significant (operation)

Type of Effect Temporary, indirect and negative (construction)

Permanent, indirect and neutral to positive (operation)

Table 22-15 Viewpoint Analysis – Crichton Street

Figure 22-7a-b Viewpoint 2: Crichton Street


Description This viewpoint is located on Crichton Street at the southernmost point of the street where it

meets Millburn Street. The view represents views from residential properties and the street

itself. The view in Figure 22-7a looks east along the row of terraced houses on Crichton

Street towards a row of facing houses and buildings which gradually taper towards Millport

pier. Beyond the pier the eastern edge of Millport Bay is visible beyond the Eileans and is

denoted by houses which stretch along the distant Marine Parade towards Farland Point,

backclothed by the dense woodland on Ninian Brae. The mainland is visible in the distance



Figure 22-7a-b Viewpoint 2: Crichton Street


beyond the trees. Figure 22-7b shows views to the south and south-east. The main focal

points in this direction are Hunterston Power Station and the open sea between the mainland

and Little Cumbrae. The rock outcrop is visible in the foreground of the view.

Sensitivity The viewpoint is located within the Millport Conservation Area and is in a location where

residents would have a view. The value of the viewpoint is therefore assessed as High.

Residents would be more susceptible to changes in views from their primary residence. The

proposed scheme would introduce some new, low lying elements into the foreground of the

view and the susceptibility to change from the introduction of the proposed scheme is

assessed as High to Medium. The sensitivity to change is therefore assessed as High.

Magnitude of

Change (under

Construction)

During construction there would be fencing around the walls, delivery vehicles, potential site

storage areas and construction vehicles and activity in the view. Excavation and

reinstatement of the footpath would be required, and road closures would be required. A

50m long section of masonry revetment will also be replaced with a concrete stepped

revetment. A temporary working platform would be built on the foreshore for the

construction of the breakwater and there would be construction machinery placing large

rocks. The magnitude of change would be High.

Magnitude of

Change (Whilst

in Operation)

The proposed scheme would introduce a low-lying flood wall with incorporated seating along

the seaward edge of Crichton Street. The existing revetment would be replaced by a

stepped revetment which would double as terraced seating towards the end of Crichton

Street as it nears the rocky promontory and buildings. The proposed rock armour revetment

would also be visible to the fore of the facing houses in the view and would continue to the

end of the rocky protrusion. The rock armour would tone with the natural rock and would

reduce the visibility of the hard, concrete edge fore of the facing houses. To the south of the

view, shore connected rock armour would be visible extending from the rocky outcrop in the

foreground. None of these elements would be prominent new features in the view, but they

would be noticeable as small changes. The magnitude of change would be Low.


Magnitude High (construction)

Low (operation)

Level of Effect Substantial and Significant (construction)




Table 22-16 Viewpoint Analysis – Clyde Street

Figure 22-8 a-b Viewpoint 3: Clyde Street


Description This viewpoint is located at a small rocky beach area to the rear of Clyde Street accessed from

Clyde Street along a pedestrian footpath between two buildings to the east of the street. The

viewpoint represents views from residential properties and users of nearby recreational routes.

The view east is of close-range built form, railings, sea walls, natural rock and concrete

structures. Beyond this there is a view across the bay towards Farland Point and the mainland

beyond. In the mid-view, the Eileans form a secondary focal point in the view. In the view to

the south, the main focal points are the Hunterston Power Station, the Spoig and the sea

beyond the mainland (Figure 22-8b). Foreground elements in the view to the south-west

include a small section of sandy beach (out of view), natural rock foreshore and sea walls.



Figure 22-8 a-b Viewpoint 3: Clyde Street


Sensitivity The viewpoint is located within the Millport Conservation Area and is in a location where

residents would have a view. It is also located near several recreational routes. The value of

the viewpoint is therefore assessed as High. Residents would be more susceptible to

changes in views from their primary residence. The view would be experienced by walkers

whose attention or interest is likely to be focused on the landscape. The proposed scheme

would introduce some new, low lying elements into the foreground of the view and the

susceptibility to change from the introduction of the proposed scheme is assessed as High to

Medium. Sensitivity to change is therefore assessed as High.

Magnitude of

Change (under

Construction)

During construction there would be limited access to this area. A temporary working platform

would be built on the foreshore for the construction of the rock revetment and there would be

construction machinery placing the large rocks. There would also be visibility of dredging

vessels and delivery barges in views towards Hunterston. The magnitude of change would

be High.

Magnitude of

Change (Whilst

in Operation)

The proposed scheme would introduce a rock armour revetment to the natural rock up to the

built residential walls to the south-west (Figure 22-8b). Although the rock armour would be

noticeable in the view, it would not form a prominent new feature but would be noticeable as

a small change in the foreground of the wider view. The proposed offshore breakwater

would also be visible in the view south and would introduce a linear rocky element that would

span the open water to the fore of Hunterston. The visual effects would be further reduced

due to the foreground built elements and the built distant elements at Hunterston. The

magnitude of change would be Medium-Low for the offshore breakwater, and Low for the

remainder of the proposed scheme.


Magnitude High (construction)Medium-Low to Low (operation)

Level of Effect Substantial and Significant (construction)


Type of Effect Temporary, indirect and negative (construction)Permanent, indirect and

neutral to positive (operation)

Table 22-17 Viewpoint Analysis – Millport Pier

Figure 22-9a-d Viewpoint 4: Millport Pier


Description This viewpoint is located at the seaward end of the pier and represents views from residents

and visitors to the pier. The view north-east to east looks across Newtown Bay and the

expanse of buildings arcing the bay beyond the shoreline and promenade. Key focal points in

this direction include the Cathedral of the Isles spire, the colour and massing of built form and

activity / movement along the promenade. To the south-east and south, the view is across the

mouth of Millport Bay towards the mainland. Key features in this direction include the Eileans

in the midground, distant mainland hills and Hunterston Power Station. Views south to south-

west look across the open expanse of water towards the Spoig and Little Cumbrae islands.

Views west and north-west look over the western edge of Millport Bay and include buildings

and shoreline. Features in this direction include the Isle of Arran in the distance.

Sensitivity The viewpoint is located on the boundary of the Millport Conservation Area, and is also the

starting or end points for a number of recreational routes. The value of the viewpoint is

therefore assessed as High. The view would be available for visitors and residents accessing

the pier, but the pier is not currently used by ferries or promoted as a tourist destination. The



Figure 22-9a-d Viewpoint 4: Millport Pier


proposed scheme would introduce some new, low lying elements into the mid-ground of the

view and the susceptibility to change from the introduction of the proposed scheme is assessed

as Medium. The sensitivity to change is therefore assessed as High to High-Medium.

Magnitude of

Change (under

Construction)

During construction there would be visibility of temporary fencing, delivery and works

vehicles / machinery along the coastline to the north-east. A temporary working platform

would be built on the foreshore for the construction of the rock revetment to the west and

north-west and there would be construction machinery placing large rocks. There would be

dredging vessels for the proposed offshore works and activity from barges delivering

materials. The magnitude of change would be High to High-Medium.

Magnitude of

Change (Whilst

in Operation)

The proposed scheme would introduce a variety of low-lying elements into the view along the

Millport shoreline to the north-east and south-west. These would include refurbishment of

the flood wall and jetties, proposed linear flood walls / seating, increased ground levels,

stepped revetments / terraced seating to the north and north-east (Figure 22-9a-b) and rock

armour revetment and shore connected rock armour breakwater to the west (Figure 22-9d).

The proposed offshore breakwater would be a noticeable linear element in the view to the

south / south-east and would introduce new features between The Leug, The Spoig and the

Eileans (Figure 22-9c). These would form a line that would appear to partially enclose

Millport Bay when viewed from this location (the extent of the offshore breakwater visibility

would, however, reduce towards the middle of the pier and towards Quayhead as

infrastructure on the pier become foreground features, partially screening the offshore

breakwater). The magnitude of change would be Medium for the proposed offshore

breakwater, and Low to Negligible for the remainder of the proposed scheme.

Assessment Sensitivity High to High-Medium

Magnitude High to High-Medium (construction)

Medium (proposed offshore breakwater) (operation)

Low to Negligible (remaining elements of the proposed scheme) (operation)

Level of

Effect

Substantial to Substantial / Moderate and Significant (construction)

Substantial / Moderate and Significant (proposed offshore breakwater)

(operation)

Moderate to Slight and Not Significant (remaining elements of the proposed

scheme) (operation)

Type of

Effect

Temporary, indirect and negative (construction)


Table 22-18 Viewpoint Analysis – Stuart Street

Figure 22-10a-b Viewpoint 5: Stuart Street


Description This viewpoint is located on Stuart Street at a viewing area along the existing seawall. The

main focus of the view east is along the arc of the bay where the coloured buildings and

activity of Millport are evident. The wooded Ninian Brae forms the back-drop to the buildings

with the mainland visible in the distance beyond. Jetties, rock outcrops and the Eileans are

visible features in the Midview. In views to the south, the Hunterston Power Station forms a

focal point on the distant mainland, framed between Millport pier and the Eileans. Views to

the west are towards Millport townscape.

Sensitivity The viewpoint is located within the Millport Conservation Area and comprises a section of a

number of recreational routes. The value of the viewpoint is therefore assessed as High. The



Figure 22-10a-b Viewpoint 5: Stuart Street


view would be experienced by residents, visitors and users of the recreational routes. The

proposed scheme would introduce some new, low lying elements into the foreground and

mid-ground of the view. The susceptibility to change from the introduction of the proposed

scheme is assessed as High to Medium. Sensitivity to change is therefore assessed as High.

Magnitude of

Change (under

Construction)

During construction access to the wall in the foreground would be restricted and there would

be visibility of fencing along the promenade, delivery vehicles, potential site storage areas

and construction vehicles and activity in the view.

There would also be visibility of dredging vessels and delivery barges in the bay. The

magnitude of change would be High.

Magnitude of

Change (Whilst

in Operation)

The proposed scheme would introduce a variety of low-lying elements into the view along the

Millport shoreline to the east. These would include refurbishing the existing concrete crest wall

in the foreground (Figure 22-10b), the introduction of linear flood walls / seating as well as

stepped revetments / terraced seating to the north-east (Figure 22-10a). The proposed

offshore breakwater would be visible to the south, partially screened by Millport pier. This

would be visible as a rocky linear feature that would appear as a similar rocky feature to the

Eileans and would be seen in the context of the pier. The magnitude of change would be Low.


Magnitude High (construction)

Low (operation)

Level of

Effect

Substantial and Significant (construction)


Type of

Effect

Temporary, indirect and negative (construction)


Table 22-19 Viewpoint Analysis – Guildford Street

Figure 22-11a-b Viewpoint 6: Guidlford Street


Description This viewpoint is located adjacent to the Millport Cenotaph on the promenade, looking east

and south along the bay and south-east towards the mainland. It represents views from

residential properties along the front and from people visiting and walking along the

promenade. The view east is along the hard, elevated edge of the promenade, railings and

the colour and activity of the buildings and traffic. The main focal points are the close-range

elements such as planters / street furniture, movement / activity of people and traffic, and the

colourful buildings. The main focal points to the south-east include the Cenotaph, the

Eileans, Hunterston Power Station and boats in the bay. To the south Little Cumbrae is

visible, and in the wider view are the brightly coloured children’s swings and a crazy golf

course. Benches are arranged along the promenade to face south towards the bay, the

Eileans and Little Cumbrae.

Sensitivity The viewpoint is located within the Millport Conservation Area at a point traversed by a


view would be experienced by residents, visitors and users of the promenade and

recreational routes. The proposed scheme would introduce some new, low lying elements

into the foreground and mid-ground of the view. The susceptibility to change from the

introduction of the proposed scheme is assessed as High to Medium. Sensitivity to change is




Figure 22-11a-b Viewpoint 6: Guidlford Street


Magnitude of

Change (under

Construction)

During construction there would be visibility of fencing along the promenade, delivery

vehicles, potential site storage areas, construction vehicles and activity in the view. Access

to parts of the promenade would be restricted where parts of the footpath are excavated for

construction. There would also be visibility of dredging vessels and delivery barges in the

bay. The magnitude of change would be High to High-Medium.

Magnitude of

Change

(Whilst in

Operation)

The proposed scheme would introduce a variety of low-lying elements into the mid-ground of

the view along the Millport shoreline to the east. These would include a linear flood wall /

seating replacing existing benches and planters along the middle of the paved area in the mid-

view, and linear flood walls / seating to the shoreside of increased ground level / grassed areas

and stepped revetment / terraced seating to the north-east (Figure 22-11a). The proposed

offshore breakwater would be visible to the south as a new rocky linear feature that would span

part of the bay and appear as a similar rocky feature to the Leug and The Spoig (Figure 22-

11b). The magnitude of change would be Medium-Low for the proposed offshore breakwater,

and Low to Negligible for the remainder of the proposed scheme.



Medium-Low to Negligible (operation)


Moderate to Slight / Negligible and Not Significant (operation)



Table 22-20 Viewpoint Analysis – Glasgow Street

Figure 22-12a-b Viewpoint 7: Glasgow Street


Description This viewpoint is located towards the eastern end of Glasgow Street. The view looks west

across Glasgow Street to Cross House and Ninean Brae to the east and an open area of

grass towards the Eileans, Little Cumbrae and the Isle of Arran to the south-west. It is

representative of views from residential properties along the street and from residents and

visitors to the promenade and those using the recreational routes. In the foreground of the

view, built form occupies the view to the east with Cross House being a prominent feature.

To the south and south-west, an expanse of amenity grassland falls gently towards the shore

edge to the rocky beach beyond. Due to the relative lack of foreground elements, the eye is

drawn out across the open grass and water to the more distant views where the Eileans,

Little Cumbrae and the Isle of Arran form the main focal points. Benches are lined along the

promenade with primary views to the south and south-west.








Magnitude of

Change (under

Construction)


vehicles, potential site storage areas and construction vehicles and activity in the view.

Access to parts of the promenade would be restricted. There would also be distant visibility



Figure 22-12a-b Viewpoint 7: Glasgow Street


of dredging vessels and delivery barges in the bay. The magnitude of change would be High

to High-Medium.

Magnitude of

Change (Whilst

in Operation)

The proposed scheme would introduce low-lying elements into the foreground of the view

along the Millport shoreline.

The seaward section of the garden wall at the Cross House would be rebuilt at the same

height and a further section of flood wall up to 1.2m high would extend west from the Cross

House wall. This would slightly increase screening of the foreshore and water in the

foreground of the view. The level of the grass area on the landward side of this wall will be

raised and planting introduced to reduce the impact of the new wall on the view.

Further west, the level of the grass area will be raised, and a short section of low flood wall /

seating constructed on the seaward side of the grass area. The proposed raised grass

would integrate this section in the view such that there would be minimal visual effect other

than a slight increase in screening of the foreshore in the view.

The proposed offshore breakwater would be mostly screened by the Eileans in the view but

the western edge would be visible and would appear to bridge the Eileans with the Leug.

This would occupy a very small part of the overall view and would appear as a rocky, linear

feature that would not be out of character or in contrast to existing elements. The magnitude

of change would be Low to Negligible.



Low to Negligible (operation)


Moderate to Slight and Not Significant (operation)



Table 22-21 Viewpoint Analysis – Kelburn Street

Figure 22-13a-b Viewpoint 8: Kelburn Street


Description This viewpoint is located on Kelburn Street at the junction with Ferry Road and is orientated

south-east to south-west across grassland towards Kames Bay. It represents views from

residential properties along Kelburn Street and Kames Bay Road and from visitors to the

promenade and using the recreational routes. In the foreground of the view to the south-east,

an expanse of amenity grassland falls gently towards the promenade and sandy beach

beyond. Houses line the road around the bay in this direction and Ninean Brae rises up

forming a wooded back-drop, with the main view out towards the open water. The mainland is

just visible beyond Farland Point. To the south-west, terraced houses line Kelburn Street with

views out across the grassland to the seascape beyond. Little Cumbrae forms a focal point to

the right of the view and the Isle of Arran forms a secondary focal point beyond in the distance.

Street furniture such as benches and lamp posts line the edge of the road in each direction.








Figure 22-13a-b Viewpoint 8: Kelburn Street




Magnitude of

Change (under

Construction)


vehicles / barges, potential site storage areas and construction vehicles and activity in the

view. Access to parts of the promenade would be restricted. Additional barges and dredging

activity would take place beyond the Eileans and would be visible as a distant feature. The

magnitude of change would be High to High-Medium.

Magnitude of

Change (Whilst

in Operation)

The proposed scheme would introduce low-lying elements into the foreground of the view.

These would include linear flood walls / terraced seating to the shore side of the grassed

area. The ground level would be increased to the seaward edge of the grassed area to

accommodate the wall / terraced seating. To the left of the view (Figure 22-13a), white

railings along the existing seawall would be replaced by a low (0.8m high) sea wall. The

proposed offshore breakwater would be mostly screened by the Eileans in the view but the

western edge would be visible and would appear as a distant feature beyond the Eileans

connecting to the Leug. This would occupy a very small part of the overall view and would

appear as a rocky, linear feature that would not be out of character or in contrast to existing

elements. The magnitude of change would be Low to Negligible.



Low to Negligible (operation)


Moderate to Slight and Not Significant (operation)



Table 22-22 Viewpoint Analysis – Farland Hill

Figure 22-14 Viewpoint 9: Farland Hill


Description This viewpoint is located at an elevated point halfway along the ridge between Farland Hill

and Craigengour Hill. It is representative of views for walkers accessing a network of

informal paths. There are long range, panoramic views from the north-west to the south-east

from this location. The view towards the proposed scheme is orientated north-west towards

Millport Bay. The main foci of the view in this direction is the expanse of Millport along the

bay, the Eileans, and the Isle of Arran.

Sensitivity The viewpoint is located within the Great Cumbrae Special Landscape Area. The value of the

viewpoint is therefore assessed as High, although it does not correspond with any

documented vantage points or features of interest. The view would be experienced by

walkers whose attention is likely to be on the surrounding landscape and seascape. The

proposed scheme would introduce some new, low lying elements into the foreground and mid-

ground of the view. The susceptibility to change from the introduction of the proposed scheme

is assessed as High to Medium. Sensitivity to change is therefore assessed as High.

Magnitude of

Change (under

Construction)

During construction there would be distant visibility of construction activity along the

promenade, delivery vehicles, potential site storage areas and construction vehicles. This

would be seen in a small part of the view in the context of the settlement of Millport where

there is movement and activity. There would also be distant visibility of dredging vessels and



Figure 22-14 Viewpoint 9: Farland Hill


delivery barges in the bay. This would only occupy a small area of the view and would be

seen at distance. The magnitude of change would be Low to Negligible.

Magnitude of

Change (Whilst

in Operation)

The proposed scheme would introduce low-lying built elements into the mid-ground of the

view and would include narrow strips of linear sea walls / seating and stepped revetments /

terraced seating along the shoreline to the fore of the grassed area, rock armour revetments

and shore connected rock armour breakwater and proposed offshore breakwater. These

elements would be barely discernible in the view and would not be out of character or in

contrast to existing built elements in the view. The magnitude of change would be Negligible


Magnitude Low to Negligible (construction)

Negligible (operation)

Level of Effect Moderate / Slight to Slight and Significant (construction)

Slight to Negligible and Not Significant (operation)

Type of Effect Temporary, indirect and negative to neutral (construction)


22.6.8.3 Visual Effects on Views from Settlements

182. As described in Section 22.4, Millport is the only settlement within the Study Area and effects of the

proposed scheme on the settlement is assessed below. Viewpoints 1-8 (Figures 22-6 to 22-14)

illustrates views of the proposed scheme from different parts of the settlement, primarily along the

promenade.

183. The value of the settlement is assessed as Medium to High due to the Millport Conservation Area

and the adjacent Great Cumbrae Special Landscape Area. Susceptibility to change from the

introduction of the proposed scheme is assessed as. The overall sensitivity to change is therefore

assessed as High.

184. The proposed onshore flood protection works is at the interface between the settlement and the

coastal edge (with the additional proposed offshore flood protection works out in the bay). Although

there is a density to the settlement, some houses are situated in streets with limited or no views of

the proposed scheme. ZTV analysis and site visits confirm that the proposed scheme would be most

visible from those residential receptors facing the promenade, in particular from:

• Glasgow Street;

• Kelburn Street;

• Marine Parade;

• Kames Bay;

• Guilford Street;

• Stuart Street;

• Clyde Street

• Crichton Street;

• Millburn Street; and

• West Bay Road.



185. There would be additional views from other parts of the settlement where visibility would be less due

to additional intervening-built form or vegetation. Views from these areas are most likely to be from

upper stories of buildings, through gaps in buildings or over rooftops. The proposed offshore

breakwater would be the most visible element from these, often elevated, areas.

186. Due to the topography of the bay and surrounding hill form, the settlement has developed around the

arc of bay with most buildings oriented to face the bay. A coastal road and promenade further buffer

the buildings from the shore and promote further viewing opportunities for residents. The majority of

views from the settlement therefore are focused across the bay. Key focal points in these views

include the Eileans, Hunterston Power Station, Isle of Arran and transient vessels in the bay and

beyond. The proposed scheme would feature in the foreground of views out across the bay and

would also be influenced by moving traffic, pedestrians, cyclists as well as parked cars, crazy golf,

balustrades, amenity grassland, street lighting and street furniture. The proposed scheme would

introduce relatively low-lying visual features into the view including increasing the height of existing

sea walls as well as the introduction of new linear flood walls which would double as seating and

stepped revetments which would double as seating terraces. It would also increase ground levels in

grassed areas to accommodate low levels walls / seating. Rock armour would be added to

revetments to the west of the bay and a shore connected rock armour breakwater would be added to

the west of the bay. The proposed offshore breakwater would also be visible in views from the coastal

road and promenade across the bay.

187. The magnitude of change would range from Low to Zero resulting in a Moderate to No View and Not

Significant. The nature of these effects would be permanent, direct or indirect and neutral to positive.

22.6.8.4 Visual Effects on Views from Transport Routes

188. As described in Section 22.4, the B896 is the only main route with potential visibility of the proposed

scheme and effects of the route is assessed below. The visual effects on views from this route are

annotated in Viewpoints 1, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (Figures 22-6, 22-10 to 22-13). The route was driven and

travelled in both directions in order to assess the potential effects and the assessment has been

assisted on site with the use of ZTV maps.

189. The B896 circles the island of Great Cumbrae following the coastline and is the road that directly

accesses the ferry to and from Largs. The route passes through Millport and runs parallel to the

proposed onshore flood protection works.

190. The route is located within the Great Cumbrae Special Landscape Area and passes through the

Conservation Area of Millport. The route is also promoted as part of the Cumbrae Cycle Route and

there are various sections of Core Paths along the route. The value of the route is therefore assessed

as High to Medium. Most road users would experience the landscape transiently whilst driving or

cycling and experiencing a sequence of views of the proposed scheme, often in one direction focused

on the direction of travel and often experienced at speed (Low susceptibility). As a result, the overall

sensitivity of road users on this route has been assessed as Medium.

191. ZTV analysis indicates that there would be theoretical visibility of the proposed scheme as the road

enters Millport Bay near Farland Point and continues as the road passes through the settlement

towards Nupkur Point to the west. There would be transitory views of the proposed scheme which

would be visible in the context of parked cars and movement of other vehicles, pedestrians and

cyclists. The most visible elements are likely to be increased ground levels in grassed areas to

accommodate low levels walls / seating and new flood wall on the promenade between Clifton Street

and College Street. Both of these would be relatively low lying in the view and would form the



foreground to views out across the bay to more distant focal points. The proposed offshore breakwater

would also be visible out in the bay in the distance. The magnitude of change would range from

Medium-Low to Negligible resulting in a Moderate to Slight / Negligible and Not Significant effect.

The nature of these effects would be permanent, indirect and neutral to positive.

22.6.8.5 Visual Effects on Views from Recreational Routes


(walkers / cyclists / horse riders / joggers / others) on recreational routes within the Study Area. The

assessment of recreational routes is set out in Table 22-23. The locations of the recreational routes

are illustrated in Figure 22-5. Each of these routes were walked and / or visited and walked in sections

according to the ZTV coverage.

193. All of the routes have been assessed as of High sensitivity on account of their High to Medium value

as recreational routes and the High susceptibility of the people using these routes, mostly walkers

and cyclists, whose attention would be focused on the landscape and seascape around them.

Table 22-23 Visual Effects on Views from Recreational Routes

Receptor Description of Effects

Cumbrae Cycle Route 1

(partly overlapped by

B896, Core Paths NC1,

NC1a, NC2, NC77, NC74

and NC82)

Cumbrae Cycle Route 1 is a popular recreational route that follows the B896

around the island. Core Paths NC1, NC1a, NC2, NC77, NC74 and NC82 follow the

same route as Cumbrae Cycle Route 1 around Millport Bay, but divide the route up

into individual segments. The visual effects on views from these routes are

annotated in Viewpoints 1, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (Figures 22-6, 22-10 to 22-13).

ZTV analysis indicates that there would be theoretical visibility of the proposed

scheme as the route enters Millport Bay near Farland Point. Visibility continues as

the road passes through Millport until the road turns north-west near Nupkur Rock

to the west. There would be transitory views of the proposed scheme which would

be visible in the context of parked cars and movement of other vehicles,

pedestrians and cyclists. The most visible elements would be increased ground

levels in grassed areas to accommodate low level flood walls / seating, new flood

wall on the promenade between Clifton Street and College Street and raised sea

walls at Marine Parade and West Bay Road / Millburn Street. These would be

relatively low lying in the view and would form the foreground to views out across

the bay to more distant focal points. The proposed offshore breakwater would also

be visible out in the bay in the distance. The magnitude of change would range

from Medium-Low to Negligible and the resulting level of effect would be Moderate

to Slight and Not Significant. The nature of these effects would be permanent,

indirect and neutral to positive.

Inner Circle Walk


B896, Cumbrae Cycle

Routes 1 and 2 and

Core Paths NC2 and

NC86)

The Inner Circle Walk follows a route from the coastal front / B896 in the centre of

Millport and follows minor roads up the rising landform to Glaid Stone and Barbay

Hill in the centre of the island, returning along the B899. It is partly overlapped by

the Cumbrae Cycle Routes 1 and 2, and Core Paths NC2 and NC86. However,

there is no visibility of the proposed scheme from the sections overlapped by

Cumbrae Cycle Route 2 and Core Path NC86. The visual effects on views from

these routes are annotated in Viewpoints 7 and 8 (Figures 22-12 to 22-13).

The ZTV indicates theoretical visibility of the proposed scheme along the B896 /

Cumbrae Cycle Route 1 / NC2 and where the route climbs the hill north of

Breakough Farm. Site visits confirmed that there would be very limited views from

the hill slopes north of Breakough Farm due to surrounding vegetation and

distance. The main feature visible from this location would be glimpsed views of the




proposed offshore breakwater. The main views would occur on the section of the

route that follows the B896 / Cumbrae Cycle Route 1 / NC2 within Millport. From

this section of the route there would be visibility of increased ground level adjacent

to the road which would in turn screen new linear flood wall / seating elements.

These elements would be relatively low lying in the view and would form the

foreground to views out across the bay to more distant focal points. The proposed

offshore breakwater would also be visible out in the bay in the distance. The

magnitude of change would range from Low to Negligible and the resulting level of

effect would be Moderate to Slight and Not Significant. The nature of these effects

would be permanent, indirect and neutral to positive.

Farland Point Walk


B896, Cumbrae Cycle

Route 1, Core Paths

NC1, NC1a, NC2,

NC41, NC77 and NC82,

and Inner Circle Walk)

Farland Point Walk extends from the old pier in Millport along the B896 to Farland

point located at the eastern tip of Millport Bay. The route is partly overlapped by the

Cumbrae Cycle Route 1, Core Paths NC1, NC1a, NC2, NC41, NC77 and NC82,

and the Inner Circle Walk. The visual effects on views from these routes are

annotated in Viewpoints 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (Figures 22-9 to 22-13).

The proposed scheme would be visible along the majority of the route where there

would be visibility of increased ground level adjacent to the road which would in

turn screen new linear flood wall / seating elements. There would also be visibility

of the increased height of the existing sea wall along Marine Parade. These

elements would be relatively low lying in the view and would form the foreground to

views out across the bay to more distant focal points. The proposed offshore

breakwater would also be visible out in the bay in the distance; however, it would

be most prominent from the pier itself (Viewpoint 4). The rocky promontory of the

route at the eastern end is partially covered in scrub vegetation which screens

some views inland in places. The main focus of views from this section of the route

are across the Firth of Clyde towards the Isle of Arran, Little Cumbrae and

Hunterston. The magnitude of change would range from Medium to Negligible and

the resulting level of effect would be Substantial / Moderate and Significant (from

and near the pier due to the proposed offshore breakwater only) to Moderate to

Slight and Not Significant (from the remainder of the route). The nature of these

effects would be permanent, indirect and neutral to positive.

Fintray Bay Walk


B896, Cumbrae Cycle

Route 1, Core Paths

NC1, NC74 and

Targets Walk)

Fintray Bay Walk is a circuit to the west of the bay. It starts at Millport Pier and

follows B896 west past Nupkur Point and follows the road to Fintray Bay where it

heads along a track back inland towards Upper Kirkton where it picks up a minor

road and follows it past Mid Kirkton from where it drops back down to the pier.

Targets Walk follows a similar route but instead of following the B896 at Nupkur

Rock, it continues down the coast towards the rock and follows the coast line /

B896 north until Sheriff’s Port where it cuts east and joins the Fintray Bay Walk at

Upper Kirkton.

The visual effects on views from these routes are annotated in Viewpoints 1 and 4

(Figures 22-6 and 22-9).

ZTV analysis illustrates that the main views from the routes are where it travels

along the B896 towards Nupkur Rock. From here there would be views of the

increased height sea walls, and the new flood wall / seating at Foul Port and views

across to the shore connected rock armour breakwater and rock armour revetment

adjacent to Foul Port. The greatest effects would occur where the routes pass in

close proximity to the north of Foul Port along West Bay Road. At this point the sea

wall would form the boundary to the road and would extend an existing low-lying

wall. An additional wall would run along Millburn Street, reinforcing and extending




an existing wall. Similarly the Shore connected rock armour breakwater would

extend and reinforce an existing rock promontory to the south of Millburn Street.

The proposed offshore breakwater would be visible as a new rocky feature above

the water surface out in the bay but would join existing rock formations (The Spoig

and The Leug and heading towards the southern Eileans island).

Visibility of the walls would reduce as the routes continue along West Bay Road

towards Nupkur Rock due to intervening built elements (play area, sheltered

seating), vegetation and distance. The proposed offshore breakwater would still be

visible as a feature due to the flat expansive nature of the sea (subject to

intervening built form and vegetation), but would become less of a prominent

feature, occupying a smaller part of the wider view. The main orientation of views

from Nupkur are across the bay towards the mainland to the east and south-east,

Little Cumbrae to the south and Arran to the west.

The magnitude of change would range from Medium to Negligible and the resulting

level of effect would be Substantial / Moderate and Significant (from the old pier

due to the proposed offshore breakwater only) to Moderate to Slight and Not

Significant (from the remainder of the routes). The nature of these effects would be

permanent, indirect and neutral to positive.

22.6.8.6 Visual Effects on Views from Recreational and Tourist Destinations


at recreational / visitor or tourist destinations or attractions within the Study Area. The assessment of

recreational and tourist destinations is set out in Table 22-24 and are illustrated in Figure 22-5.

195. Each of these destinations were visited and the assessment has been assisted on site with the use

of ZTVs.

196. All of the recreational and tourist destinations have been assessed as of High sensitivity on account

of their High value as recreational destinations and the High susceptibility of the people visiting these

destinations.

Table 22-24 Visual Effects on Recreational and Tourist Destinations


Millport

Promenade

Millport Promenade extends around most of Millport Bay, although the most frequently used part

of the promenade is towards the centre of the bay where there is access to local shops,

beaches and promenade attractions such as crazy golf. The area is heavily visited by tourists in

the summer months who visit the island via a ferry from Largs or paddle steamer from Ayr or

Port Glasgow. The visual effects on views from the promenade are annotated in Viewpoints 4,

5, 6, 7 and 8 (Figures 22-9 to 22-13).

The proposed scheme would introduce and upgrade elements along the promenade which

would include increased ground levels in grassed areas to accommodate low level flood walls /

seating, new flood wall on the promenade between Clifton Street and College Street and raised

sea walls at Marine Parade and West Bay Road / Millburn Street. These would be relatively

low lying in the view and would form the foreground to views out across the bay to more distant

focal points. The proposed offshore breakwater would also be visible out in the bay in the

distance. Stepped revetments would be introduced doubling as terraced seating leading to the

foreshore. Resurfacing of the existing wall at Stuart / Guilford Street would also be visible.




These elements would be visible to those using the promenade but would not appear un-familiar

in this context and would not affect the overall experience of the views from the promenade.

Views from the promenade also feature distant focal points such as Hunterston Power Station,

Little Cumbrae and Isle of Arran as well as vessels in and beyond the bay. In these views, the

proposed onshore flood protection works would be seen as secondary, foreground elements,

effecting a noticeable, but small level of change. The proposed offshore breakwater, part of the

proposed offshore protection works would be visible as a new rocky feature above the water

surface but joining existing rock formations (The Spoig and The Leug and heading towards the

southern Eileans island) and would appear most prominent from the old pier, as illustrated in

Viewpoint 4.

The magnitude of change would range from Medium to Negligible and the resulting level of

effect would be Substantial / Moderate and Significant (from and near the old pier due to the

proposed offshore breakwater only) to Moderate to Slight and Not Significant (from the

remainder of the promenade). The nature of these effects would be permanent, indirect and

neutral to positive.

Crocodile

Rock

Crocodile Rock is a popular tourist attraction and comprises a crocodile head painted onto

naturally formed rock, roughly resembling a crocodile head. It is located on the beach adjacent

to a jetty to the south of Glasgow Street.

From the rock itself, the main focus of the view is out across the bay towards the Eileans, Little

Cumbrae and Hunterston Power Station. The proposed scheme modifications in the vicinity of

the jetty would be noticeable in the foreground of the view. In views inland towards Millport,

stepped revetments doubling as terraced seating leading from the promenade to the foreshore

would be the most noticeable element. Beyond this, low level flood walls / seating

accommodated by increased ground levels would be visible. There would be glimpses of the

proposed offshore breakwater beyond the Eileans in the mid-ground of views to the south-west.

These elements would not appear un-familiar in this context and would not affect the overall

experience of Crocodile Rock.

The magnitude of change would be Low and the resulting level of effect would be Moderate and

Not Significant. The nature of these effects would be permanent, indirect and neutral to

positive.

22.6.8.7 Visual Effects on Views from Ferry / Sailing Routes


on ferries and sailing routes within the Study Area. The assessment is set out in

198. Table 22-25 and illustrated in Figure 22-5.

Table 22-25 Visual Effects on Views from Ferry / Sailing Routes


Paddle

Steamer

Waverley

This seasonal paddle steamer ferries tourists / visitors from Port Glasgow to Cumbrae via

stops on the mainland, Isle of Bute and Isle of Arran. At the time of assessment, the vessel

has been out of service due to repairs, however, it has been included in the assessment as a

precaution. The paddle steamer has a varied timetable and at times approaches Great

Cumbrae from the south (from Ayr), stopping at Keppel Pier to the south-east of Millport. On

other occasions it passes the bay to the south en-route to Rothesay and the Isle of Arran.

Views of the proposed scheme from the paddle steamer would be distant and the proposed

onshore flood protection works would be viewed as minor features in the wider view of the

settlement of Millport, with other features such as the cathedral spire, pier and painted




buildings forming focal points in the view. The proposed offshore breakwater, part of the

proposed offshore flood protection works would be visible as the vessel passes to the south of

the bay but would join existing rock formations (The Spoig and The Leug and heading towards

the southern Eileans island) and therefore would not be incongruous with surrounding

features. The breakwater would be seen in the context of the settlement of Millport and at a

moderate distance of over 1km.

The magnitude of change would be Negligible, and the resulting level of effect would be Slight

and Not Significant. The nature of these effects would be permanent, indirect and neutral.

Recreational

Yachts and

Small Vessels

There are a number of yachts and small vessels used recreationally in Millport Bay and

around the island. They are sometimes seen moored in the bay or are stored on land near

Nupkur Rock. Views from these vessels towards Millport and the proposed onshore flood

protection works would be similar to those described for the P.S. Waverly consisting of minor

features in a wider view of Millport with other features such as the cathedral spire, pier and

painted buildings forming focal points in the view.

The proposed offshore breakwater, part of the proposed offshore flood protection works would

be the most visible element of the proposed scheme. This would be visible at relatively close

range and would therefore be seen as a more prominent man-made linear feature joining and

extending beyond The Leug and The Spoig towards the Eileans.

The magnitude of change would range from High-Medium to Negligible and the resulting level

of effect would be Substantial to Substantial / Moderate and Significant (due to the proposed

offshore breakwater only) to Slight to Negligible and Not Significant. The nature of these

effects would be permanent, indirect and neutral.

22.7 Summary of Effects

199. A summary of the seascape, landscape and visual effects are provided in Table 22-26.

Table 22-26 Summary of seascape, landscape and visual effects

Receptor Sensitivity Construction Effects Operation Effects

Magnitude Level of Effect Magnitude Level of Effect

Landscape Effects – Landscape Character

LCT 61 - Coastal Fringe with Agriculture

Medium to Low

High to Zero Substantial / Moderate to None

Low to Zero Slight to None

Landscape Effects - Landscape Designations

Great Cumbrae Special Landscape Area

Medium Medium to Zero

Moderate to None Low to Zero Slight to None


High-Medium High-Medium to Zero

Substantial / Moderate to None

Low to Zero Slight to None

Coastal Zone (Developed Coast)

Medium High to Zero Substantial / Moderate to None

High to Zero Substantial / Moderate (offshore breakwater) to None

Seascape Effects - Seascape Character

Millport Coastal Character Area

Medium High to Zero Substantial / Moderate to None

High to Zero Substantial / Moderate (offshore breakwater) to None

Visual Effects - Viewpoints





VP1 – Milburn Street

High High to Medium

Substantial to Substantial / Moderate

Low Moderate

VP2 – Chricton Street

High High Substantial Low Moderate

VP3 – Clyde Street High High Substantial Medium-Low to Low

Moderate

VP4 – Millport Pier High to High-Medium

High to High-Medium


Medium (offshore breakwater)

Substantial / Moderate (offshore breakwater)

Low to Negligible (remainder of the proposed scheme)

Moderate to Slight (remainder of the proposed scheme)

VP5 – Stuart Street

High High Substantial Low Moderate

VP6 – Guildford Street

High High to High-Medium


Medium-Low to Negligible

Moderate to Slight / Negligible

VP7 – Glasgow Street



Low to Negligible Moderate to Slight

VP8 – Kelburn Street




VP9 – Farland Hill High Low to Negligible

Moderate / Slight to Slight

Negligible Slight to Negligible

Visual Effects - Settlements

Millport High High to Zero Substantial to None

Low to Zero Moderate to No View

Visual Effects – Transport Routes

B896 Medium High to Zero Substantial / Moderate to None


Moderate to Slight / Negligible

Visual Effects – Recreational Routes

Cumbrae Cycle Route 1 (partly overlapped by B896, Core Paths NC1, NC1a, NC2, NC77, NC74 and NC82)

High High-Medium to Zero

Substantial to Substantial / Moderate to None


Moderate to Slight

Inner Circle Walk (partly overlapped by B896, Cumbrae Cycle Routes 1 and 2 and Core Paths NC2 and NC86)




Farland Point Walk (partly overlapped by B896, Cumbrae Cycle Route 1, Core Paths NC1,



Medium to Negligible

Substantial / Moderate (offshore breakwater) to Slight





NC1a, NC2, NC41, NC77 and NC82, and Inner Circle Walk)

Fintray Bay Walk (partly overlapped by B896, Cumbrae Cycle Route 1, Core Paths NC1, NC74 and Targets Walk)





Visual Effects – Recreational and Tourist Destinations

Millport Promenade

High High to Zero Substantial to None



Crocodile Rock High Medium-Low Moderate Low Moderate

Visual Effects – Sailing / Ferry Routes

Waverley Steam Paddler

High Negligible Slight Negligible Slight

Recreational Yachts and Small Vessels

High High-Medium to Negligible

Substantial to Substantial / Moderate to Negligible

High-Medium to Negligible

Substantial to Substantial / Moderate (offshore breakwater) to Negligible



22.8 Conclusions

200. The SLVIA has been undertaken in accordance with the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact

Assessment, Third Edition (GLVIA 3) by chartered landscape architects at Wood. The assessment

process has encompassed the construction and operation phases of the proposed scheme and has

included design development and re-assessment of the residual effects.

201. The design and assessment process has taken account of national and local planning requirements

as described in Section 22.2, and the design considerations described in the Firth of Clyde Seascape

Assessment, Section 7: Upper Firth of Clyde & The Cumbraes (2010), in relation to development in

Millport.

202. The effects of the proposed scheme on the seascape, landscape and visual receptors within the

Study Area was found to be greatest at the start of and during construction reducing towards the end

of the construction period. In contrast, the level of effect during operation was found to be significantly

lower than the effects during construction.

203. During construction, significant effects were assessed for the majority of receptors due to the spread

of works and construction activity across the bay, and proximity and visibility of the proposed works.

The construction period would be phased and likely to last up to 18 months. Significant effects on

landscape and seascape character would be very localised and not affect the wider LCT / CCA. The

receptors that would experience no significant effects include those at a distance from the proposed

scheme including Farland Hill (Viewpoint 9), users of the P.S. Waverley, and the Great Cumbrae SLA

(which does not extend into the settlement of Millport).

204. During operation, there would be no significant effects on landscape character. Significant effects

were, however, assessed on the Coastal Zone (Developed Coast) and the Millport CCA only as a

result of the proposed offshore flood protection works. Similarly, users of Millport promenade

(including the pier – Viewpoint 4), Farland Point Walk, Fintry Bay Walk, Cumbrae Cycle Route 1, Core

Path NC77 and the B896 (by the pier end only), and recreational users of yachts and small vessels

in the bay would experience significant visual effects as a result of the proposed offshore flood

protection works only. None of the above receptors would experience significant effects as a result of

the proposed onshore flood protection works. The remaining receptors within the Study Area would

not experience any significant effects.

205. Many of the elements of the proposed scheme are familiar features in the seascape and townscape

and this is a key factor in the low level of effects during operation. The design of the proposed scheme

further integrates the various elements into the surrounding features. Care has been taken with

materials and colour choices for the works and many of the elements are low lying and unobtrusive,

and replace or enhance existing elements such as revetments and sea walls. This has resulted in a

design that seeks to unify existing disparate elements across the bay and provides a sense of quality

and coherence.

206. Overall, the design and mitigation mean that the landscape, seascape and visual effects of the

proposed scheme are reduced as far as possible and through the simple and clear design of the

proposed scheme, where visible, can be viewed as acceptable in landscape terms.



22.9 References

Ayrshire Paths – Cumbrae Walks and Cycling.

Firth of Clyde Forum (2013). Seascape / Landscape Assessment of the Firth of Clyde.

Historic Environment Scotland website - https://www.historicenvironment.scot/.

Landscape Institute and IEMA (2013). Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Third

Edition.

Landscape Institute (2019). Residential Visual Amenity Assessment: Technical Guidance Note 2/19.

Landscape Institute (2019). Visual Representation of Development Proposals, Technical Guidance Note.

National Trust for Scotland website - https://www.nts.org.uk/.

North Ayrshire Council, Coastal Design Guidance.

North Ayrshire Council, Core Paths Plan.

North Ayrshire Council, East Ayrshire Council and South Ayrshire Council (2007) Ayrshire Joint Structure

Plan.

North Ayrshire Council (2008). Landscape Capacity Assessment – Arran and Cumbrae, Landscape

Assessment of Potential Development Areas.

North Ayrshire Council (2013a). Millport Conservation Area Appraisal.

North Ayrshire Council (2013b). Millport Conservation Area Management Plan.

North Ayrshire Council (2019) Local Development Plan.

Scottish Government (2014a). National Planning Framework for Scotland.

Scottish Government (2014b). Scottish Planning Policy

Scottish Natural Heritage (2018). Coastal Character Assessment, Guidance Note, Version 1a.

Scottish Natural Heritage (2019). National Landscape Character Assessment.

Scottish Natural Heritage (2019). Scottish Landscape Character Types Map and Descriptions.

Visit Scotland website - https://www.visitscotland.com/.

Millport Flood Protection SchemeSeascape, Landscape and Visual ImpactAssessment

Figure 22.1Seascape, Landscape and Visual Study Area(2km)

November 2019

KeyH:\

Projec

ts\41

942 M

illpor

t Lan

dsca

pe Ap

prais

al\D

Desig

n_Te

chnic

al\Ar

cGIS\

4194

2-GLA

001.m

xd O

rigina

tor: w

ilsc03

© Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence number AL100001776.

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 km

1:20,000Scale at A3:

Client

0.5km

1km

Proposed Coastal FPS

SLVIA Study Area

Lines indicating the distancefrom the proposed coastal FPS

1.5km

2km

P P

P P

P

P

P

P

P

P

1 23 4

56

7

8

9

10


Figure 22.2Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) to 2kmwith viewpoints

November 2019

KeyH:\

Projec

ts\41

942 M

illpor

t Lan

dsca

pe Ap

prais

al\D

Desig

n_Te

chnic

al\Ar

cGIS\

4194

2-GLA

002.m

xd O

rigina

tor: w

ilsc03


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 km


Client

0.5km

1km


SLVIA Study Area


1.5km

2km

P Viewpoints1) Milburn Street2) Chricton Street3) Clyde Street (rear view)4) Millport Pier5) Stuart Street6) Guildford Street7) Glasgow Street8) Kelburn Street9) Farland Hill

Proposed Coastal FPS may betheoretically visible

P Scoped Out Viewpoints10) Glaid Stone

Note: Height range between 0.5m and 4m AOD as perthe Project Description

Note:This drawing is based on a computer generated Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV). The area in green indicates the maximum theoretical visibility of the proposed coastal FPS using Aerial Photography Derived 2m DSM data only and takes into account some screening from vegetation and built-form. The ZTV also includes an adjustment that allows for the Curvature and Light Refraction of the Earth


Figure 22.3Landscape and Seascape Character (2km)

November 2019

KeyH:\

Projec

ts\41

942 M

illpor

t Lan

dsca

pe Ap

prais

al\D

Desig

n_Te

chnic

al\Ar

cGIS\

4194

2-GLA

003.m

xd O

rigina

tor: w

ilsc03


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 km1:20,000Scale at A3:

Client

0.5km

1km


1.5km

2km

Landscape Character Types (LCTs), SNH2019

59) Raised Beach Coast and Cliffs


SLVIA Study Area

61

1a

61) Coastal Fringe with Agriculture

Millport

Coastal Character Areas,Landscape/Seascape Assessment of theFirth of Clyde Section 7, May 2013

Great or Big Cumbrae Island

Little Cumbrae Island

Largs to Goldenberry

61


Figure 22.4Landscape Planning Designations (2km)

November 2019

KeyH:\

Projec

ts\41

942 M

illpor

t Lan

dsca

pe Ap

prais

al\D

Desig

n_Te

chnic

al\Ar

cGIS\

4194

2-GLA

005.m

xd O

rigina

tor: w

ilsc03


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 km1:20,000Scale at A3:

Client

0.5km

1km

SLVIA Study Area

Lines indicating the distancefrom the proposed coastal FPSGreat Cumbrae Special LandscapeArea



1.5km

2km

Developed CoastlineCoastal Zone

Undeveloped Coastline

Isolated Coast

P

P

P

P

PP

1

2

3

4

56


Figure 22.5Recreational Routes and Key TouristDestinations (2km)

November 2019

KeyH:\

Projec

ts\41

942 M

illpor

t Lan

dsca

pe Ap

prais

al\D

Desig

n_Te

chnic

al\Ar

cGIS\

4194

2-GLA

006.m

xd O

rigina

tor: w

ilsc03


0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 km


Client

0.5km

1km


1.5km

2km

Tourist AttractionsP

1) Crocodile Rock2) Millport Holiday Park3) Millport Golf Course4) The Lion5) Roberton Museum and Aquarium6) Westbourne Caravan Park

Core Paths


Waverley Ferry Route

NC44

NC86 NC86

NC1a

NC82NC41

NC1

NC82

NC2

NC77

NC2

NC2

NC74

NC2

NC1

Inner Circle Walk

Cumbrae Cycle Routes

Farland Point Walk

Targets Walk

Fintry Bay Walk

1) Round Island2) Inner Circle to Glaid Stone

1

2

1

2

2

1

1) NC12) NC1a3) NC24) NC415) NC44

6) NC747) NC778) NC829) NC86

1

Note:This drawing is based on a computer generated Zone ofTheoretical Visibility (ZTV). The area in green indicates themaximum theoretical visibility of the proposed coastal FPS using Aerial Photography Derived 2m DSM data only and takes into account some screening from vegetation and built-form. The ZTV also includes an adjustment that allows for the Curvature and Light Refraction of the Earth.

Proposed Coastal FPS may betheoretically visible

Note: Height range between 0.5m and 4m AOD as perthe Project Description

SLVIA Study Area

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

007.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c

Millport Flood Protection SchemeSeascape, Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

Figure 22.6aViewpoint 1 - Milburn Street

November 2019

Photograph Parameters Viewpoint 1:Location grid reference: E215 710, N654 588 GPS location accuracy: +/- 3m Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mk IIHorizontal field of view: 90º (cylindrical projection) Lens: 50mmPaper size: 820mm x 250mm (A1) Camera high: 1.5m AGLCorrect printed image size: 315 x 95mm Date and time: 15/10/2019 14:10

Millburn StreetConcrete Crest Wall Concrete Crest Wall 0.8m to 1.0m high0.8m to 1.0m high

West Bay Road

Foul Port

Concrete Flood Wall Concrete Flood Wall 1.0 to 1.2m high1.0 to 1.2m highReplacement of Access RampReplacement of Access Ramp

Rock Armour on Seaward Side Rock Armour on Seaward Side

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

007.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.6bViewpoint 1 - Milburn Street

November 2019

Photograph Parameters Viewpoint 1:Location grid reference: E215 710, N654 588 GPS location accuracy: +/- 3m Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mk IIHorizontal field of view: 90º (cylindrical projection) Lens: 50mmPaper size: 820mm x 250mm (A1) Camera high: 1.5m AGLCorrect printed image size: 315 x 95mm Date and time: 15/10/2019 14:10

Concrete Flood WallConcrete Flood Wall1.0 to 1.2m high1.0 to 1.2m high

Shore connected Rock Armour Breakwater Shore connected Rock Armour Breakwater Up to 2.4m above sea level (MHWS)Up to 2.4m above sea level (MHWS)

Offshore Breakwater Offshore Breakwater Up to 2.6m above sea level (MHWS)Up to 2.6m above sea level (MHWS)

Mainland

The Spoig

Hunterston Power Station

Millport Bay

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Concrete Flood Wall Concrete Flood Wall 0.8m to 1.0m high0.8m to 1.0m high

Concrete Stepped Revetment Concrete Stepped Revetment Up to 8m wide and up to 2m highUp to 8m wide and up to 2m high

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

008.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.7aViewpoint 2 - Crichton Street

November 2019

Photograph Parameters Viewpoint 1:Location grid reference: E215 860, N654 566 GPS location accuracy: +/- 3m Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mk IIHorizontal field of view: 90º (cylindrical projection) Lens: 50mmPaper size: 820mm x 250mm (A1) Camera height: 1.5m AGLCorrect printed image size: 315 x 95mm Date and time: 15/10/2019 14:20

Millport PierRock Armour RevetmentRock Armour RevetmentUp to 20m wide and up to 6m highUp to 20m wide and up to 6m high

Up to 2.4m above high water (MHWS)Up to 2.4m above high water (MHWS)

Crichton Street Ninian Brae Mainland Farland Point

Offshore Breakwater Offshore Breakwater Up to 2.6m above MHWSUp to 2.6m above MHWS

Eilean Island

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

008.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.7bViewpoint 2 - Crichton Street

November 2019


Offshore BreakwaterOffshore BreakwaterUp to 2.6m above high water (MHWS)Up to 2.6m above high water (MHWS) Shore connected Rock Armour Breakwater Shore connected Rock Armour Breakwater

Up to 2.6m above sea level (MHWS)Up to 2.6m above sea level (MHWS)

The Spoig

Mainland

Little Cumbrae


Concrete flood wall (Crichton Street) Concrete flood wall (Crichton Street) 0.8 to 1.0m high0.8 to 1.0m high

Concrete flood wall (Millburn Street) Concrete flood wall (Millburn Street) 1.0 to 1.2m high1.0 to 1.2m high

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

009.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.8aViewpoint 3 - Clyde Street

November 2019

Photograph Parameters Viewpoint 3:Location grid reference: E216 033, N654 700GPS location accuracy: +/- 3m Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mk IIHorizontal field of view: 90º (cylindrical projection) Lens: 50mmPaper size: 820mm x 250mm (A1) Camera height: 1.5m AGLCorrect printed image size: 315 x 95mm Date and time: 15/10/2019 14:40

Farland Point South Eilean Mainland

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

009.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.8bViewpoint 3 - Clyde Street

November 2019


Offshore Breakwater Offshore Breakwater Up to 2.6m above high water (MHWS)Up to 2.6m above high water (MHWS)

Rock Armour RevetmentRock Armour RevetmentUp to 20m wide and up to 6m highUp to 20m wide and up to 6m high


Hunterston Power Station The Spoig The Leug (Submerged)

Re-face Existing Wall (Landward Side)Re-face Existing Wall (Landward Side)No change in wall heightNo change in wall height

[The view of this structure is unchanged][The view of this structure is unchanged]

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Flood WallsFlood WallsUp to 0.9m highUp to 0.9m high

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

010.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.9aViewpoint 4 - Millport Pier

November 2019

Photograph Parameters Viewpoint 4 :Location grid reference: E216 169, N654 681 GPS location accuracy: +/- 3m Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mk IIHorizontal field of view: 90º (cylindrical projection) Lens: 50mmPaper size: 820mm x 250mm (A1) Camera height: 1.5m AGLCorrect printed image size: 315 x 95mm Date and time: 15/10/2019 14:50

Cathedral of the Isles

Pier InfrastructureNewtown Bay

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Offshore Breakwater Offshore Breakwater Up to 2.6m above high water (MHWS)Up to 2.6m above high water (MHWS)

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

010.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.9bViewpoint 4 - Millport Pier

November 2019


Concrete Crest WallConcrete Crest WallUp to 0.8m highUp to 0.8m high

Increased Ground Levels and Concrete Flood Walls / SeatingIncreased Ground Levels and Concrete Flood Walls / Seating - Up to 1.2m high - Up to 1.2m high

Concrete Stepped Revetment - Up to 10m wide and up to Concrete Stepped Revetment - Up to 10m wide and up to 3m high3m high

Jetty RefurbishmentJetty Refurbishment

North Eilean

Mainland Hill South EileanMillport Bay

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

010.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.9cViewpoint 4 - Millport Pier

November 2019


Offshore BreakwaterOffshore BreakwaterUp to 2.6m above MHWSUp to 2.6m above MHWS

Hunterston Power Station The Spoig The Leug Little Cumbrae

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

010.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.9dViewpoint 4 - Millport Pier

November 2019


Concrete Flood Wall (Crichton Street)Concrete Flood Wall (Crichton Street)0.8 to 1.0m high0.8 to 1.0m high

Rock Armour Revetment Rock Armour Revetment Up to 20m wide and up to 6m highUp to 20m wide and up to 6m high


Shore Connected Rock Breakwater Shore Connected Rock Breakwater Armour BreakwaterArmour Breakwater


Isle of ArranPier Infrastructure

Concrete Flood WallConcrete Flood WallUp to 0.7m highUp to 0.7m high

Increased Ground Levels and Concrete Flood Walls / SeatingIncreased Ground Levels and Concrete Flood Walls / Seating- Up to 1.2m high- Up to 1.2m high

Concrete Stepped Revetment - Up to 10m wide and up to Concrete Stepped Revetment - Up to 10m wide and up to 3m high3m high

Jetty RefurbishmentJetty RefurbishmentConcrete Crest WallConcrete Crest Wall

Up to 0.8m highUp to 0.8m high

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

011.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.10aViewpoint 5 - Stuart Street

November 2019


Jetty Ninean BraeMainland North Eilean South Eilean

Millport Bay

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3


Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

011.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.10bViewpoint 5 - Stuart Street

November 2019


Offshore BreakwaterOffshore BreakwaterUp to 2.6m above high water (MHWS)Up to 2.6m above high water (MHWS)


Millport Pier

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Glasgow Street

Guildford Street

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

012.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.11aViewpoint 6 - Guildford Street

November 2019


Increased Ground Levels and Concrete Flood Walls / SeatingIncreased Ground Levels and Concrete Flood Walls / Seating- Up to 1.2 high- Up to 1.2 high

Concrete Stepped Revetment - Up to 10m wide and up to Concrete Stepped Revetment - Up to 10m wide and up to 3m high 3m high

Jetty RefurbishmentJetty Refurbishment



0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

012.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.11bViewpoint 6 - Guildford Street

November 2019

Photograph Parameters Viewpoint 6:Location grid reference: E216 296, N654 937GPS location accuracy: +/- 3m Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mk IIHorizontal field of view: 90º (cylindrical projection) Lens: 50mmPaper size: 820mm x 250mm (A1) Camera height: 1.5m AGLCorrect printed image size: 315 x 95mm Date and time: 15/10/2019 13:55

Offshore BreakwaterOffshore BreakwaterUp to 2.6m above high water (MHWS)Up to 2.6m above high water (MHWS)

Hunterston Power StationMainland

North Eilean South Eilean

Little Cumbrae

Millport Cenotaph

Millport Bay

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

013.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.12aViewpoint 7 - Glasgow Street

November 2019


Concrete Flood Wall 1.0m to 1.2m highConcrete Flood Wall 1.0m to 1.2m high(Cross House Seaward Facing Garden Wall Replaced at Same height)(Cross House Seaward Facing Garden Wall Replaced at Same height)

Concrete Stepped Revetment / Terraced Seating from Concrete Stepped Revetment / Terraced Seating from Promenade to ForeshorePromenade to Foreshore

Up to 10.0m wide and up to 3.0m highUp to 10.0m wide and up to 3.0m high

Concrete Stepped Revetment / Concrete Stepped Revetment / Terraced Seating Leading from Terraced Seating Leading from

Promenade to ForeshorePromenade to Foreshore

Cross House

Ninean Brae

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

013.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.12bViewpoint 7 - Glasgow Street

November 2019


Concrete Seating / Flood WallConcrete Seating / Flood WallUp to 0.7m highUp to 0.7m high

Concrete Flood Wall 1.0m to 1.2m highConcrete Flood Wall 1.0m to 1.2m highat Seaward Side of Grass Areaat Seaward Side of Grass Area

Concrete Stepped Revetment / Terraced Seating Concrete Stepped Revetment / Terraced Seating from Promenade to Foreshorefrom Promenade to Foreshore

Up to 10m wide and up to 3m highUp to 10m wide and up to 3m high

Little CumbraeThe Eileans

Glasgow Street

Isle of Arran

Increased Ground LevelsIncreased Ground Levels

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Ninean BraeKames Bay Road Kames Bay

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

014.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.13aViewpoint 8 - Kelburn Street

November 2019



Raised Grass Areas wth Terraced Steps / Seating to meet PromenadeRaised Grass Areas wth Terraced Steps / Seating to meet PromenadeGrass raised by up to 1m, steps up to 1.5m highGrass raised by up to 1m, steps up to 1.5m high

Mainland

Farland Point

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

Little CumbraeIsle of Arran

Kelburn Street

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

014.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.13bViewpoint 8 - Kelburn Street

November 2019


Raised grass area with Terraced Steps / Setting beyond to meet PromenadeRaised grass area with Terraced Steps / Setting beyond to meet PromenadeGrass raised by up to 1m, steps up to 1.5m highGrass raised by up to 1m, steps up to 1.5m high

Concrete Stepped Revetment / Terraced SeatingConcrete Stepped Revetment / Terraced SeatingUp to 10m wide and up to 3.0m highUp to 10m wide and up to 3.0m high

Concrete FloodConcrete FloodWallWall

1.0m to 1.2m1.0m to 1.2mhighhigh

Offshore Offshore BreakwaterBreakwaterUp to 2.6m Up to 2.6m above highabove high

water (MHWS)water (MHWS)

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

0 m0 m 375 m375 m

Scale 1:10,000 @ A3Scale 1:10,000 @ A3

South Eilean North Eilean

Isle of ArranLittle Cumbrae Isle of Bute

Millport Bay

Client

H:\Pro

jects\

4194

2 Millp

ort La

ndsca

pe Ap

praisa

l\D D

esign

_Tech

nical\

Draw

ings\4

1942

-GLA

015.i

ndd

Origi

nator

: bryc

c


Figure 22.14 Viewpoint 9 - Farland Hill

November 2019


Offshore BreakwaterOffshore BreakwaterUp to 2.6m above high water (MHWS) Up to 2.6m above high water (MHWS)

Rock Armour Revetment Rock Armour Revetment Up to 20m wide and up to 6m highUp to 20m wide and up to 6m high


Shore Connected Rock Armour Shore Connected Rock Armour Breakwater Breakwater

Up to 2.6m above high level Up to 2.6m above high level (MHWS)(MHWS)


[The view of this structure is unchanged][The view of this structure is unchanged]Concrete Flood WallConcrete Flood Wall

Up to 0.7m highUp to 0.7m high


Concrete Stepped Revetment / Terraced Seating Concrete Stepped Revetment / Terraced Seating Raised Grass AreasRaised Grass Areas

Documents

Chapter 22 Seascape Landscape Visual Impact compressed (1) · SNH Scottish Natural Heritage ZTV Zone of Theoretical Visibility . Project related 31 January 2020 PB4749-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0022