Chapter 2 International Data...2016/12/02 · Turkey Hong Kong Iran New Zealand Brazil Columbia Israel Lithuania Switzerland Hungary Denmark Netherlands Poland Germany Argentina Canada

Chapter 2

International Data

2�2�

�Interna�onal�comparisons�

where if contributing countries have updated their final numbers subsequent to this publication.

To assist in equitable comparisons the international definition of an organ donor, used by all contributors to IRoDaT, is that of an Actual deceased organ donor is a consented eligible donor from whom at least one organ was recovered for the purpose of trans-plantation (World Health Organisation). This differs slightly to the historical data reported in previous ANZOD reports, whereby the definition used was that of an Actual donor - a person from whom the re-trieval operation is commenced for the purpose of transplantation. This includes donors who may be deemed medically unsuitable at time of surgery or after removal of organs.

Figure 2.1 show the difference to the reported ANZOD numbers when each definition is applied.

Organ donation and transplantation is a world wide practice which extends and enhances the quality of peoples lives suffering from end stage organ failure. Many countries have implemented procedures and sys-tems to address meeting the need for transplantation. This year the Registry has expanded its reporting with greater comparisons of Australia and New Zealand to global activity and comparatively over time.

For the purpose of this comparison, data has been sourced from the International Registry in Organ Dona-tion and Transplantation (hereinafter IRODaT). Data was sourced on October 4, 2013 from the IRODaT website http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php and represents data compiled from broad selection of the 72 world wide contributing countries over the past 4-5 years.

Data reported hereinafter on international donation and transplantation rates may differ to that reported else-

0

5

10

15

20

Per

Mill

ion

Pop

ulat

ion

19981999

20002001

20022003

20042005

20062007

20082009

20102011

2012

Year

Organ Donors (ANZOD)

Organ Donors (International)

Organ DonorsPer Million Population, Australia

Organ Donors Per Million Population by Definition 1998 - 2012

Figure 2.1

2

2�3�

Interna�onal�comparisons�

36.535.1

32.926.326.0

24.324.0

23.523.0

22.522.4

19.919.8

19.018.3

17.016.5

16.115.715.6

15.115.0

14.714.3

13.713.4

12.812.6

12.010.2

8.67.37.26.9

4.54.5

3.43.12.9

0.90.3Bulgaria

JapanRussia

Saudi ArabiaRomania

VenezuelaTurkey

IranHong Kong

IsraelNew Zealand

ColumbiaSwitzerland

BrazilGermanyDenmarkLithuaniaHungaryCanadaSweden

NetherlandsAustralia

ArgentinaPoland

UruguayIreland

United KingdomLatvia

Czech RepublicFinland

ItalyAustria

SloveniaNorway

PortugalEstonia

USAPuerto Rico

BelgiumSpain

Croatia

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0

DPMP

2012

Figure 2.2 International Deceased Donor Rates 2012

�

Organ donation and transplantation rates vary across the world and many countries are striving to increase donor numbers. Despite the various programs, there remains unmet demand. Global-ly there is considerable activity and momentum among governmental and professional bodies to improve donation rates.

The usual metric of measuring and comparing international deceased organ donation rates is ‘donors per million population’. Figures 2.2 to 2.6 compares deceased organ donation rates of forty countries contributing data to IRODaT and where Australia and New Zealand is placed comparatively per year for the past 5 years.

Figures 2.7 to 2.26 compare the organ trans-plantation rate per million population per specific organ, retrospectively to 2009.

Data for all countries reported hereinafter has been sourced from the IRODaT website and was compiled on October 4, 2013. This does not rep-resent the ranking of these countries world wide.

International Deceased Organ Donor Rates (Donor Per Million Population)

Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013

2�4�

32.030.4

28.725.925.6

25.223.4

21.620.9

20.519.6

17.116.4

15.915.815.7

14.814.514.5

14.013.7

13.313.012.9

12.612.612.5

10.99.79.69.4

8.86.7

4.13.9

3.53.53.43.2

2.90.9Japan

BulgariaRomania

RussiaTurkey

VenezuelaSaudi Arabia

IranHong Kong

IsraelNew Zealand

BrazilIreland

LithuaniaColumbia

SwedenSwitzerland

DenmarkNetherlands

PolandCanada

AustraliaUruguay

ArgentinaLatvia

EstoniaHungary

GermanyUnited Kingdom

FinlandCzech Republic

SloveniaNorway

ItalyAustria

BelgiumUSA

Puerto RicoCroatia

PortugalSpain

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0

DPMP

2010



Figure 2.4

35.335.0

29.328.5

26.025.6

23.523.2

21.920.7

20.319.4

17.917.617.317.0

15.515.415.415.115.114.714.5

13.213.113.112.8

12.211.8

11.010.7

8.65.6

4.74.6

3.83.73.43.3

0.90.6Bulgaria

JapanRussia

Saudi ArabiaRomania

VenezuelaTurkey

Hong KongIran

New ZealandBrazil

ColumbiaIsrael

LithuaniaSwitzerland

HungaryDenmark

NetherlandsPoland

GermanyArgentinaAustraliaCanadaSwedenSlovenia

United KingdomFinland

Czech RepublicLatvia

EstoniaUruguay

IrelandItaly

AustriaPuerto Rico

NorwayUSA

PortugalBelgiumCroatia

Spain

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0

DPMP

2011

International Deceased Donor Rates 2011


Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013. Data represents a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete donation data in 2010 and 2011.

This does not represent the ranking of these countries world wide.

2

2�5�

34.431.0

26.326.1

25.825.0

24.621.321.1

19.419.1

17.617.4

17.016.3

15.014.914.814.714.5

13.913.913.8

13.313.0

12.512.3

11.311.0

10.09.8

8.77.5

4.23.33.22.92.7

2.01.6

0.8JapanBulgaria

RomaniaRussia

IranVenezuela

Saudi ArabiaTurkey

Hong KongBrazilIsrael

New ZealandPoland

AustraliaColumbiaArgentina

NetherlandsSwitzerland

SwedenHungary

DenmarkCanada

LithuaniaLatvia


IrelandSlovenia

CroatiaFinland

Czech RepublicUruguayNorway

ItalyEstoniaAustria

BelgiumUSA

Puerto RicoPortugal

Spain

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0

DPMP

2009

34.229.0

26.726.2

24.823.1

21.120.5

20.119.5

19.219.1

17.917.3

16.515.2

14.714.714.614.6

13.113.0

12.312.111.811.8

11.29.79.6

7.77.37.2

5.34.5

3.63.3

2.92.92.6

0.90.8Bulgaria

JapanRussia

RomaniaIran

VenezuelaTurkey

Saudi ArabiaHong Kong

BrazilNew Zealand

IsraelColumbiaLithuania

PolandDenmark

SwitzerlandAustralia

NetherlandsLatvia

ArgentinaCanada


HungaryFinland

SwedenIrelandCroatia

UruguayCzech Republic

SloveniaAustriaNorway

ItalyEstonia

BelgiumUSA

PortugalPuerto Rico

Spain

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0

DPMP

2008


International Deceased Donor Rates 2009


Figure 2.6


Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013. Data represents a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete donation data in 2008 and 2009.

This does not represent the ranking of these countries world wide.

2�6�

53.146.346.2

45.743.8

42.838.2

36.735.3

33.230.430.4

29.927.8

27.026.6

25.525.525.125.125.1

24.323.022.8

21.620.920.4

19.517.617.4

16.413.8

10.18.0

7.37.07.07.0

5.61.7

1.1BulgariaJapan

RussiaSaudi Arabia

VenezuelaTurkey

RomaniaHong Kong

IranNew Zealand

IsraelBrazil

ColumbiaPuerto Rico

HungaryArgentinaLithuania

SwitzerlandSlovenia

DenmarkCanada

GermanyNetherlands

AustraliaItaly

SwedenPoland

United KingdomEstonia

Czech RepublicFinland

LatviaUSA

IrelandUruguay

AustriaBelgiumPortugalNorway

SpainCroatia

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0

PMP

2011


53.847.5

43.943.743.6

42.636.4

35.034.734.7

33.431.0

30.229.4

28.728.628.5

27.626.826.7

25.525.3

24.124.124.0

22.220.720.5

19.516.8

12.612.012.0

11.49.18.9

6.95.2

4.41.5

0.6BulgariaJapan

Saudi ArabiaRussiaTurkey

RomaniaIsrael

VenezuelaHong Kong

IranNew Zealand

ColumbiaSwitzerland

BrazilCanada

GermanyPuerto Rico

DenmarkArgentinaLithuaniaSweden

ItalyAustraliaHungary

NetherlandsIrelandPoland

United KingdomUruguaySlovenia

Czech RepublicUSA

FinlandLatvia

PortugalAustria

BelgiumNorwayEstonia

SpainCroatia

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0

PMP

2012

International Transplantation Rates Kidney 2012

Figure 2.7 International Transplantation Rates Kidney 2011

Figure 2.8

Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.

Figures 2.7 and 2.8 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation ac-tivity from deceased donors, per million population, for kidney in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This does not repre-sent the ranking of these countries world wide.

International Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)

2

2�7�


56.044.8

41.439.6

39.039.0

35.435.2

32.732.6

30.127.8

26.325.625.5

24.724.724.3

23.222.121.621.521.3

20.820.5

18.518.3

17.313.3

12.412.211.7

6.25.9

5.44.84.64.5

3.81.4

0.0IrelandJapan

RomaniaSaudi Arabia

BulgariaRussia

IranVenezuela

TurkeyNew Zealand

Hong KongIsraelBrazil

Puerto RicoAustralia

ColumbiaPoland

ArgentinaUnited Kingdom

SloveniaCanada

LithuaniaNetherlandsSwitzerland

HungarySweden

ItalyDenmarkGermany

LatviaCzech Republic

FinlandUruguayCroatia

USANorwayAustriaEstonia

BelgiumSpain

Portugal

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0

PMP

2009

49.248.9

41.739.6

38.136.9

34.230.730.5

27.827.5

26.426.126.1

24.823.023.023.022.622.522.522.5

21.621.621.1

19.119.0

17.315.6

10.510.4

7.96.26.26.1

5.65.15.1

1.50.0

1IrelandJapanTurkey

BulgariaRomania

RussiaSaudi Arabia

VenezuelaIran

Hong KongNew Zealand

BrazilPuerto Rico

ColumbiaLithuaniaArgentina

SwedenCanada

United KingdomNetherlands

AustraliaSwitzerland

ItalyDenmarkSlovenia

PolandUruguayEstonia

HungaryGermany

LatviaCzech Republic

FinlandUSA

NorwayAustria

BelgiumSpain

Portugal

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0

PMP

2010

International Transplantation Rates Kidney 2010

Figure 2.9 International Transplantation Rates Kidney 2009

Figure 2.10


Figures 2.9 and 2.10 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for kidney in 2010 and 2009 respectively. This does not rep-resent the ranking of these countries world wide.

International Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)

2�8�


29.822.722.6

20.116.016.0

15.114.914.8

13.512.5

11.410.910.7

10.110.0

9.69.4

8.78.48.48.48.2

6.86.36.3

5.75.55.5

5.35.0

4.64.14.0

3.51.7

1.00.30.3

0.00.0Venezuela

LatviaBulgaria

JapanRussia

Saudi ArabiaTurkey

RomaniaHungary

ColumbiaLithuania

Puerto RicoUruguay

IsraelIran

Hong KongNew Zealand

EstoniaPoland

BrazilNetherlands

DenmarkArgentina

CanadaFinland

United KingdomAustralia

Czech RepublicIreland

GermanySwitzerland

SloveniaAustria

SwedenItalyUSA

PortugalNorway

SpainBelgiumCroatia

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

PMP

2012

28.223.8

23.520.7

19.518.0

15.815.8

15.013.613.6

12.612.2

11.610.4

10.09.9

9.28.9

8.48.28.28.1

7.47.37.3

6.04.5

4.24.24.13.93.8

2.72.5

0.90.50.40.3

0.00.0Venezuela

Puerto RicoJapan

BulgariaLatvia

RussiaRomania

Saudi ArabiaLithuania

TurkeyHungary

Hong KongColumbia

IranEstonia

UruguayBrazil

NetherlandsNew Zealand

ArgentinaAustralia

Czech RepublicIsrael

DenmarkPoland

SloveniaFinland

United KingdomCanada

SwitzerlandIreland

GermanyAustria

SwedenItaly

NorwayUSA

PortugalSpain

BelgiumCroatia

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

PMP

2011

International Liver Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)

International Transplantation Rates Liver 2012

Figure 2.11 International Transplantation Rates Liver 2011

Figure 2.12


Figures 2.11 and 2.12 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for liver in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This does not repre-sent the ranking of these countries world wide.

2

2�9�


22.820.7

19.619.4

18.218.0

15.815.3

13.213.0

12.511.2

10.09.39.29.19.0

8.37.5

7.06.96.8

6.36.0

5.74.7

4.33.9

3.63.4

2.72.42.32.2

1.70.8

0.20.00.00.0

1Puerto RicoVenezuela

LatviaJapan

RussiaBulgariaEstonia

RomaniaSaudi Arabia

TurkeyIran

UruguayLithuaniaHungary

ColumbiaPoland

Hong KongArgentina

BrazilNew ZealandNetherlands

AustraliaDenmark

IrelandUnited KingdomCzech Republic

FinlandSlovenia

SwitzerlandCanadaSweden

GermanyItaly

AustriaBelgiumNorway

USAPortugal

Spain

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

PMP

2010

22.921.4

19.018.9

17.016.9

16.515.1

14.713.3

12.411.7

11.29.4

9.09.0

8.57.6

7.17.16.96.8

6.36.16.0

5.65.0

4.03.3

3.02.42.22.12.1

1.31.3

0.60.10.00.00.0Puerto Rico

LatviaVenezuela

JapanRussia

BulgariaRomania

Saudi ArabiaLithuania

IranUruguayEstoniaTurkey

HungaryColumbia

PolandArgentina

Hong KongBrazilIsrael

AustraliaNetherlands

DenmarkNew Zealand

United KingdomFinland

SloveniaCzech Republic

CanadaSwitzerland

GermanyCroatia

SwedenIreland

ItalyAustriaNorway

BelgiumPortugal

USASpain

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

PMP

2009

International Liver Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)

International Transplantation Rates Liver 2010

Figure 2.13 International Transplantation Rates Liver 2009

Figure 2.14


Figures 2.13 and 2.14 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for liver in 2010 and 2009 respectively. This does not repre-sent the ranking of these countries world wide.

2�10�


14.010.2

7.67.3

7.06.9

6.45.2

4.84.6

4.44.24.1

3.93.9

3.43.3

3.02.92.82.7

2.42.22.22.22.12.12.1

1.81.5

1.21.00.90.80.8

0.50.30.20.1

VenezuelaEstonia

RomaniaJapan

BulgariaLatvia

Saudi ArabiaTurkeyRussia

IranBrazil

Puerto RicoIsrael

PolandUruguay

ColumbiaUnited Kingdom

IrelandNetherlandsHong Kong

New ZealandArgentina

PortugalLithuaniaHungaryAustraliaCanada

ItalyFinland

GermanySwitzerland

DenmarkSweden

SpainNorway

Czech RepublicBelgium

AustriaUSA

CroatiaSlovenia

0.0 10.0 20.0

PMP

2012

8.97.4

7.06.9

6.56.1

5.95.4

5.25.0

4.64.54.54.54.4

3.33.03.0

2.72.62.6

2.42.4

2.11.8

1.61.51.41.41.31.31.3

1.01.0

0.80.8

0.30.30.2

VenezuelaEstonia

JapanBulgaria

RomaniaBrazil

RussiaSaudi Arabia

IranTurkey

Hong KongIrelandLatvia

HungaryPuerto Rico

LithuaniaColumbia

PolandUnited Kingdom

UruguayArgentina

NetherlandsNew Zealand

AustraliaIsrael

FinlandPortugal

GermanySwitzerland

CanadaItaly

SpainDenmarkSwedenNorwayAustria

Czech RepublicBelgiumSlovenia

USACroatia

0.0 10.0 20.0

PMP

2011

International Heart Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)

International Transplantation Rates Heart 2012

Figure 2.15 International Transplantation Rates Heart 2011

Figure 2.16


Figures 2.15 and 2.16 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for heart in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This does not rep-resent the ranking of these countries world wide.

2

2�11�


9.08.6

7.67.3

6.16.05.95.9

5.65.04.9

4.54.44.4

3.92.7

2.52.52.42.42.3

2.12.12.12.02.01.91.9

1.41.3

1.10.80.70.60.6

0.40.30.3

0.1

VenezuelaEstonia

JapanRomania

RussiaLatvia

Saudi ArabiaIran

BulgariaTurkeyBrazil

ColumbiaHong Kong

PolandIreland

Puerto RicoUnited Kingdom

NetherlandsUruguay

LithuaniaIsrael

HungaryFinland

ArgentinaNew Zealand


PortugalGermany

CroatiaDenmark

CanadaNorway

SwedenSpain

ItalyBelgium

USACzech Republic

AustriaSlovenia

0.0 10.0 20.0

PMP

2009

International Heart Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)

Figure 2.17 International Transplantation Rates Heart 2009

8.28.1

7.57.0

6.66.16.1

5.95.2

4.94.84.7

4.54.5

4.13.9

3.02.9

2.72.5

2.12.12.01.91.81.8

1.51.3

1.11.00.90.80.70.7

0.30.20.2

VenezuelaLatvia

Estonia4

IrelandJapan

RomaniaRussia

BulgariaSaudi Arabia

BrazilIran

TurkeyColumbia


ArgentinaHong Kong

HungaryPoland

UruguayNew ZealandNetherlands

AustraliaLithuaniaDenmark

FinlandItaly

SwitzerlandPortugal

GermanyCanada

SpainSwedenBelgiumNorway

Czech RepublicSlovenia

USACroatiaAustria

0.0 10.0 20.0

PMP

2010

International Transplantation Rates Heart 2010

Figure 2.18


Figures 2.17 and 2.18 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for heart in 2010 and 2009 respectively. This does not rep-resent the ranking of these countries world wide.

2�12�


14.911.7

6.56.5

6.35.65.6

5.35.05.04.94.8

4.44.4

3.23.1

2.92.4

1.91.9

1.71.3

1.00.8

0.50.40.40.30.30.3

0.10.0

VenezuelaSloveniaRomania

Puerto RicoLatvia

HungaryHong Kong

CroatiaBulgaria

RussiaIran

JapanColumbia

TurkeyBrazil

PolandSaudi Arabia

ArgentinaLithuaniaPortugalEstonia

Czech RepublicItaly

UruguayUnited Kingdom

IrelandNew Zealand

GermanyCanada

NetherlandsIsrael

FinlandSpain

DenmarkUSA

NorwaySweden


BelgiumAustria

0.0 10.0 20.0

PMP

2012

14.310.6

7.87.1

6.86.3

5.85.7

5.45.2

4.94.3

4.14.1

3.13.02.9

2.01.81.71.7

1.00.60.60.5

0.30.30.30.20.10.10.1


Puerto RicoLatvia

HungaryHong Kong

CroatiaBulgaria

RussiaTurkey

ColumbiaIran

JapanBrazil

LithuaniaPoland

UruguayArgentina

Saudi ArabiaPortugal

Czech RepublicIreland

ItalyNew Zealand

EstoniaUnited Kingdom

NetherlandsGermany

FinlandSpain

CanadaDenmark

NorwayUSA

SwedenSwitzerland

AustraliaIsrael

BelgiumAustria

0.0 10.0 20.0

PMP

2011

International Lung Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)

International Transplantation Rates Lung 2012

Figure 2.19 International Transplantation Rates Lung 2011

Figure 2.20


Figures 2.19 and 2.20 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for lung in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This does not repre-sent the ranking of these countries world wide.

2

2�13�


13.62.2

2.01.6

1.21.0

0.70.70.60.50.50.40.40.30.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.1

VenezuelaUruguay

USATurkey

SloveniaRussia

RomaniaPuerto Rico

New ZealandLithuania

LatviaIreland

HungaryHong Kong

FinlandEstoniaCroatia

Bulgaria19

ColumbiaBrazilJapan

IranNorway

Saudi ArabiaPoland

NetherlandsSwitzerland

United KingdomAustraliaPortugal

GermanyCzech Republic

ItalyCanada

ArgentinaDenmarkSwedenBelgium

SpainAustria

0.0 10.0 20.0

PMP

2010

6.31.9

1.71.31.21.11.01.00.90.9

0.70.70.60.50.50.5

0.20.20.20.20.10.10.00.0

VenezuelaUruguay

USATurkey

SloveniaRomania

Puerto RicoNorway

LithuaniaLatvia

HungaryHong Kong

FinlandEstoniaCroatia

ColumbiaBulgaria

RussiaIran

JapanSwitzerland

Saudi ArabiaNew Zealand

BrazilPoland

AustraliaIreland


ItalyArgentina

Czech RepublicCanadaPortugalBelgium

AustriaNetherlands

DenmarkSweden

SpainIsrael

0.0 10.0 20.0

PMP

2009

International Lung Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)

International Transplantation Rates Lung 2010

Figure 2.21 International Transplantation Rates Lung 2009

Figure 2.22


Figures 2.21 and 2.22 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for lung in 2010 and 2009 respectively. This does not repre-sent the ranking of these countries world wide.

2�14�


5.63.6

3.43.0

2.92.9

2.52.2

2.01.9

1.81.81.8

1.71.71.7

1.51.5

1.31.1

0.90.80.8

0.60.5

0.40.20.20.2

0.10.1

VenezuelaSlovenia

Saudi ArabiaRomaniaLithuania

LatviaHong Kong

EstoniaDenmarkBulgaria

TurkeyColumbia

IrelandRussiaJapan

IranNew Zealand

HungaryUSA

BrazilIsrael

PolandItaly

FinlandUruguayAustralia

ArgentinaAustria

CanadaCroatia

SpainPortugal

GermanyNetherlands

Czech RepublicBelgiumSweden


SwitzerlandNorway

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

PMP

2012

4.03.8

3.73.2

3.02.9

2.82.42.4

2.12.0

1.91.9

1.81.6

1.51.3

1.21.01.0

0.90.90.90.9

0.60.5

0.40.30.30.2

0.10.10.1

0.1

VenezuelaRomania

LatviaHong Kong

EstoniaDenmarkBulgaria

Saudi ArabiaRussiaFinland

ColumbiaArgentina

JapanIran

TurkeySlovenia

New ZealandPoland

LithuaniaBrazilUSA

HungaryItaly

AustraliaNetherlands

UruguayIsrael

IrelandSwitzerland

AustriaPuerto Rico

GermanyPortugal

SpainCroatia

BelgiumCzech Republic

CanadaSweden

United KingdomNorway

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

PMP

2011

International Pancreas Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)

International Transplantation Rates Pancreas 2012

Figure 2.23 International Transplantation Rates Pancreas 2011

Figure 2.24


Figures 2.23 and 2.24 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for pancreas in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This does not represent the ranking of these countries world wide.

2

2�15�


3.73.1

2.82.02.02.0

1.81.5

1.41.4

1.21.1

0.80.70.70.7

0.60.5

0.40.4

0.30.20.2

0.10.10.00.0

VenezuelaRomania

Puerto RicoLithuania

LatviaJapanIreland

HungaryHong Kong

EstoniaDenmarkColumbia

Bulgaria14

PolandAustralia

Saudi ArabiaRussia

IranNew Zealand

FinlandTurkey

Czech RepublicSlovenia

United KingdomBrazil

NetherlandsCanada

ItalyUSA

UruguayCroatia

PortugalArgentina

SwitzerlandGermany

SpainBelgiumSwedenNorwayAustria

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

PMP

2010

4.03.3

2.92.7

2.22.1

1.91.7

1.51.5

1.41.3

1.20.9

0.80.70.7

0.50.30.20.2

0.10.10.10.00.0


PolandNew Zealand

LithuaniaLatviaJapanIreland

HungaryHong Kong

FinlandEstonia

DenmarkBulgaria

ColumbiaAustralia

Saudi ArabiaRussiaAustria

Czech RepublicIran

TurkeyNetherlands

United KingdomCanada

BrazilIsrael

ItalySwitzerland

GermanyUruguay

Puerto RicoArgentina

PortugalSpain

SwedenBelgiumCroatiaNorway

USA

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

PMP

2009

International Pancreas Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)

International Transplantation Rates Pancreas 2010

Figure 2.25 International Transplantation Rates Pancreas 2009

Figure 2.26


Figures 2.25 and 2.26 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for pancreas in 2010 and 2009 respectively. This does not represent the ranking of these countries world wide.

2�16�

This�page�is�inten�onally�blank�

Documents

Chapter 2 International Data...2016/12/02 · Turkey Hong Kong Iran New Zealand Brazil Columbia Israel Lithuania Switzerland Hungary Denmark Netherlands Poland Germany Argentina Canada