Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CHANGES TO PAVEMENT
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
(PMIS)
Elias Rmeili, P.E., Brownwood District
Magdy Mikhail, P.E., Maintenance Division
October 10, 2017
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
• PMIS development began in May 1990 in response
to a Federal mandate that every State have a
Pavement Management System in place by
February 1993.
• PMIS was an expansion of Pavement Evaluation
System (PES).
• Mainframe system
History of PMIS
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
Condition Score = Distress Score x URide
URide is the Utility Factor for Ride
Quality
• For ADT< 500, a Ride Score below 2.5 will affect the
Condition Score.
• For ADT between 500 and 3000, a Ride Score below
3.0 will affect the Condition Score.
• For ADT>3000 a Ride Score below 3.5 will affect the
Condition Score.
Condition Score
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
• PMIS MapZapper is a Microsoft Access application
• It downloads PMIS data from the mainframe and
links that data to ArcGIS to make maps
• It was first developed in 1998 by Craig Cox
• It has gone through two full rewrites and more than
50 upgrades.
What is PMIS MapZapper?
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
1. Moved from Mainframe & MapZapper to Pavement
Analyst (PA).
Changes to PMIS
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
Pavement Analyst (PA)
• State of the Art Pavement Management System
• Mapping
• Ability to query and extract data
• Ability to Export Data to Excel, Shape file
• Enhanced analytical capability
• Analysis of the 4-Year Plans
• Impact of Funding Levels
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
1. Moved from MapZapper to Pavement Analyst (PA).
2. Moved from Visual to Automated Data Collection.
Changes to PMIS
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
Impact of Automated Data Collection
% Lane Miles Good or
Better
FY 16 FY 17 Change
Statewide 87.32% 84.65% -2.67%
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
1. Moved from MapZapper to Pavement Analyst (PA).
2. Moved from Visual to Automated Data Collection.
3. Reduced the effect of patching on condition score.
Changes to PMIS
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
Patching
Patchingpercent of lane area
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
New Patching Rules
A full lane width hot mix inlay or seal coat or overlay
longer than 500 feet is not considered a patch
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
ACP Patching Utility Curve
New 100% Patching Score 78
Old 100% Patching Score 63
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
Impact of Patching Adjustments
% Lane Miles
Good or Better
FY 17 (No
Adjustments)
FY 17 (W/
Adjustments)
Change
Statewide 84.65% 86.30% +1.65%
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
1. Moved from MapZapper to Pavement Analyst (PA).
2. Moved from Visual to Automated Data Collection.
3. Reduced the effect of patching on condition score.
4. Added Severe Rutting.
Changes to PMIS
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
Review Utility Factors
Rut Category Description Utility Value
Shallow Rut 0.25”<Shallow Rut<0.49 Yes
Deep Rut 0.50”<Deep Rut < 0.99” Yes
Severe Rut 1”< Severe Rut< 1.99” Yes
Failure Rut > 2.0” Yes
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
New Curve for Severe Rut
Severe Rut New
Deep Rut
Failure Rut
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
1. Moved from MapZapper to Pavement Analyst (PA).
2. Moved from Visual to Automated Data Collection.
3. Reduced the effect of patching on condition score.
4. Added Severe Rutting.
Summary of Changes to PMIS
An Introduction to Pavement Analyst
Final PMIS Scores
% Lane Miles Good or
Better
FY 16 FY 17 Change
Statewide 87.32% 86.30% -1.02%
