1
M2dcR2 Advisory Board, Ghent, 19/06/2014 CFD simulations of droplet-wall interaction upon impingement of heavy hydrocarbon droplets Amit V. Mahulkar, Pieter Verhees, Kevin M. Van Geem, Geraldine J. Heynderickx* and Guy B. Marin http://www.lct.UGent.be E-mail: [email protected] *Laboratory for Chemical Technology Technologiepark 914, 9052 Ghent, Belgium European Research Institute of Catalysis ANSYS FLUENT 13.0 Multiphase model: Volume Of Fluid (VOF) Interface tracking: Geo-reconstruct Actual interface Piece-wise linear interface Accurate when mesh size is an order of magnitude smaller than radius of curvature Phase change model Evaporation (T > T sat ) Condensation (T < T sat ) r lv =r vl = 900 s -1 = = Geometry & Mesh Gravity Inlet Outlet ¤ 880,000 cells (~ 2 m) ¤ Diameter of domain ~ 6 droplet diameter ¤ Height of domain ~ 2 droplet diameter ¤ Time step size was such that 50 time steps were needed for the droplet to reach wall Mesh on horizontal bottom wall Droplet in vertical plane of applied geometry completed with mesh CFD Model Composition Singlecomponent droplet Multicomponent droplet Parameter Vapor phase Liquid phase Density (kg/m 3 ) 9.4 830 Viscosity (kg/m.s) 710 -6 0.0032 Surface tension (N/m) 0.05 Boiling point (K) 511 →Pseudocomponent: Gasoil properties →Gas condensate ¤ Represented by 11 species ¤ 86wt% already evaporated =86wt% Multicomponent Singlecomponent Splash with ring formation Stick Splash with ligament formation Breakup Rebound Mechanism: The film keeps growing, becomes unstable and ligaments are formed. They grow until they break up. Mechanism: The entire droplet mass gets deposited on the wall and instantaneously the film starts boiling and disintigrates ¤ Mechanism: The droplet impinges on the wall, undergoes an elastic deformation and spreads until a maximum stretching diameter is reached. At that moment the surface energy of the film becomes dominant. The liquid contracts and the droplet is formed again. ¤ Outwards velocity is determined by making an energy balance. Mechanism: The droplet spreads as a film over wall. No droplet mass disengages from the wall. Mechanism: The film keeps growing. Liquid is accumulated at the periphery of the film. This liquid, detaches from the film and wall, keeps growing until it disintegrates. l = Liquid density; = Surface tension; l = liquid viscosity; D = droplet diameter = 2 = inertial force surface tension Normal Weber number V Norm Stick + Breakup For singlecomponent droplets there is no Stick + Breakup regime due to a single boiling point Multicomponent droplets have a range of boiling point temperatures. Mechanism: Due to instantaneous boiling the deposited mass fragments into smaller entities that remain deposited on the wall. Wall Surface tension Inertia Viscosity Adhesion/ Vapor film Droplet Wall roughness Wall temperature A customized regime map for impingement behavior in the convection section of a steam cracker is needed Fouling in the convection section is a major problem for crackers operating with heavy petroleum fractions. Droplet impingement on the heat exchanger walls and subsequent fouling due to thermal degradation of the liquid resulting in coke formation are observed. The amount of coke formed on the superheater walls is proportional to the amount of liquid deposited on those walls. This in turn depends on the droplet-wall interaction. Thus the ability to correctly predict the droplet behavior upon its impact on a wall is of prime importance. Superheated Steam Feed Nozzle Heavy Liquid Feed Evaporator Impinging droplets → Coke formation Feed-steam mixture overheater-1 Justification Convection section Droplet impingement Introduction Abstract Future work Acknowledgements This work presents the construction of regime maps based on CFD simulations determining Stick, Splash, Rebound and Breakup behavior of heavy hydrocarbon droplets upon impingement on a hot wall. First regime maps for droplets consisting of a single pseudo-component with gasoil properties, are constructed. Several CFD simulations for different combinations of wall temperature and incoming normal Weber number are performed. In a second step the CFD model is used to construct regime maps for multicomponent hydrocarbon droplets. ¤ This work was supported by Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO-N: G.0022.09N) and the Long Term Structural Methusalem Funding by the Flemish Government. ¤ This work was carried out using the STEVIN Supercomputer Infrastructure at Ghent University, funded by Ghent University, the Flemish Supercomputer Center (VSC), the Hercules Foundation and the Flemish Government department EWI. ¤ Perform simulations of the superheater with implementation of the developed regime maps and a coking mechanism to quantify coking. ¤ Test the applicability of the developed regime maps for different hydrocarbon mixtures and validate the regime maps with data available in literature. Splash-R Splash-(L+R) Splash-L Splash-R+Breakup Splash-(L+R)+Breakup Splash-L+Breakup Stick Breakup Rebound Splash-R Splash- (L+R) Splash-L Splash-R+Breakup Splash-(L+R)+Breakup Splash-L+Breakup Stick Breakup Rebound Stick+Breakup

CFD simulations of droplet-wall interaction upon ... · M2dcR2 Advisory Board, Ghent, 19/06/2014 CFD simulations of droplet-wall interaction upon impingement of heavy hydrocarbon

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CFD simulations of droplet-wall interaction upon ... · M2dcR2 Advisory Board, Ghent, 19/06/2014 CFD simulations of droplet-wall interaction upon impingement of heavy hydrocarbon

M2dcR2 Advisory Board, Ghent, 19/06/2014

CFD simulations of droplet-wall interaction upon impingement of heavy

hydrocarbon droplets

Amit V. Mahulkar, Pieter Verhees, Kevin M. Van Geem, Geraldine J. Heynderickx* and Guy B. Marin

http://www.lct.UGent.be E-mail: [email protected]

*Laboratory for Chemical Technology Technologiepark 914, 9052 Ghent, Belgium

European Research Institute of Catalysis

ANSYS FLUENT 13.0 Multiphase model: Volume Of Fluid (VOF)

Interface tracking: Geo-reconstruct Actual interface

Piece-wise

linear interface

Accurate when mesh size is an order

of magnitude smaller than radius of

curvature

Phase change model

Evaporation (T > Tsat ) Condensation (T < Tsat )

rlv=rvl= 900 s-1

𝑚𝑣𝑙 = 𝑟𝑣𝑙𝛼𝑙𝜌𝑙𝑇 − 𝑇𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑇𝑠𝑎𝑡

𝑚𝑙𝑣 = 𝑟𝑙𝑣𝛼𝑙𝜌𝑙𝑇 − 𝑇𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑇𝑠𝑎𝑡

Geometry & Mesh Gravity

Inlet

Outlet

¤ 880,000 cells (~ 2 m)

¤ Diameter of domain ~ 6 droplet diameter

¤ Height of domain ~ 2 droplet diameter

¤ Time step size was such that 50 time steps

were needed for the droplet to reach wall

Mesh on horizontal bottom wall

Droplet in vertical plane of

applied geometry completed

with mesh

CFD Model Composition

Singlecomponent droplet

Multicomponent droplet

Parameter Vapor phase Liquid phase

Density (kg/m3) 9.4 830

Viscosity (kg/m.s) 710-6 0.0032

Surface tension (N/m) 0.05

Boiling point (K) 511

→Pseudocomponent: Gasoil properties

→Gas condensate

¤ Represented by 11 species

¤ 86wt% already evaporated

=86wt%

Multicomponent Singlecomponent Splash with ring formation

Stick

Splash with ligament formation

Breakup

Rebound

Mechanism:

The film keeps

growing, becomes

unstable and

ligaments are

formed. They

grow until they

break up.

Mechanism:

The entire droplet

mass gets

deposited on the

wall and

instantaneously the

film starts boiling

and disintigrates

¤ Mechanism: The droplet impinges on the wall, undergoes an elastic deformation

and spreads until a maximum stretching diameter is reached. At that moment the

surface energy of the film becomes dominant. The liquid contracts and the

droplet is formed again.

¤ Outwards velocity is determined by making an energy balance.

Mechanism:

The droplet spreads as

a film over wall. No

droplet mass

disengages from the

wall.

Mechanism:

The film keeps growing.

Liquid is accumulated at

the periphery of the film.

This liquid, detaches

from the film and wall,

keeps growing until it

disintegrates.

l = Liquid density; = Surface tension;

l = liquid viscosity; D = droplet diameter

𝑊𝑒𝑁𝑜𝑟𝑚 =𝐷𝑉𝑁𝑜𝑟𝑚

2 𝜌𝑙𝜎

=inertial force

surface tension

Normal Weber number

VNorm

Stick + Breakup

For singlecomponent droplets there is no

Stick + Breakup regime due to a single

boiling point

Multicomponent droplets have a range of

boiling point temperatures.

Mechanism:

Due to instantaneous boiling the

deposited mass fragments into smaller

entities that remain deposited on the wall.

Wall

Surface

tension

Inertia

Viscosity

Adhesion/

Vapor film

Droplet

Wall roughness

Wall temperature

A customized regime map for

impingement behavior in the

convection section of a steam cracker

is needed

Fouling in the convection section is a major

problem for crackers operating with heavy

petroleum fractions.

Droplet impingement on the heat exchanger

walls and subsequent fouling due to thermal

degradation of the liquid resulting in coke

formation are observed.

The amount of coke formed on the superheater

walls is proportional to the amount of liquid

deposited on those walls. This in turn depends

on the droplet-wall interaction. Thus the ability to

correctly predict the droplet behavior upon its

impact on a wall is of prime importance.

Superheated Steam

Feed

Nozzle

Heavy Liquid

Feed

Evaporator

Impinging droplets

→ Coke formation

Feed-steam mixture

overheater-1

Justification Convection section Droplet impingement Introduction

Abstract

Future work Acknowledgements

This work presents the construction of

regime maps based on CFD simulations

determining Stick, Splash, Rebound and

Breakup behavior of heavy hydrocarbon

droplets upon impingement on a hot wall.

First regime maps for droplets consisting of a

single pseudo-component with gasoil

properties, are constructed. Several CFD

simulations for different combinations of wall

temperature and incoming normal Weber

number are performed.

In a second step the CFD model is used to

construct regime maps for multicomponent

hydrocarbon droplets.

¤ This work was supported by Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO-N: G.0022.09N)

and the Long Term Structural Methusalem Funding by the Flemish Government.

¤ This work was carried out using the STEVIN Supercomputer Infrastructure at Ghent

University, funded by Ghent University, the Flemish Supercomputer Center (VSC), the

Hercules Foundation and the Flemish Government – department EWI.

¤ Perform simulations of the superheater with implementation of the developed regime maps

and a coking mechanism to quantify coking.

¤ Test the applicability of the developed regime maps for different hydrocarbon mixtures and

validate the regime maps with data available in literature.

Splash-R

Splash-(L+R)

Splash-L

Splash-R+Breakup

Splash-(L+R)+Breakup

Splash-L+Breakup

Stick Breakup

Rebound

Splash-R

Splash-

(L+R)

Splash-L

Splash-R+Breakup

Splash-(L+R)+Breakup

Splash-L+Breakup

Stick Breakup

Rebound

Stick+Breakup