18
14th August 2012 1 E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure CFD thermal simulations IBL Enrico Da Riva, Anne-Laure Lamure 14th August 2012

CFD thermal simulations IBL

  • Upload
    kyrie

  • View
    91

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Enrico Da Riva, Anne-Laure Lamure 14th August 2012. CFD thermal simulations IBL. Beam Pipe and insulation IBL staves Boundary conditions CFD simulations settings. A . Geometry , materials and boundary conditions. 1. Beam Pipe, insulation and IPT. 2. IBL staves. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 1E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

CFD thermal simulationsIBL

Enrico Da Riva, Anne-Laure Lamure

14th August 2012

Page 2: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 2E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

A. Geometry, materials and boundary conditions

1. Beam Pipe and insulation

2. IBL staves

3. Boundary conditions

4. CFD simulations settings

Page 3: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 3E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

1. Beam Pipe, insulation and IPT

Elements MaterialThickness [mm]

Outer Diameter [mm]

Thermal conductivity [ W K-1 m-1]

beam pipe berylium 0.8 48.6

Heaterspolyimide with stainless steel 0.2 49 0.1

kapton 2 layers polyimide 0.12 49.24 0.1aerogel silicat aerogel 0,2,4 0.025

kapton 2 layers polyimide 0.12 0.1

aluminium foil aluminum 0.05 222

Gap nitrogen 58 0.0242

SectionInner Diameter

Thickness

Thermal conductivity [W K-1 m-1]

  mm mmPixel Area 58 0.325

2.2Services area 58 0.5

Page 4: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 4E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

2. IBL stavesCARBON FIBER CARBON FOAM TITANIUM PIPE 200 μm GLUE CARBON-FOAM/OMEGA

CARBON-FOAM/PIPE

GLUECHIP

BONDING

SENSOR

MATERIALS

 Thickness

[μm]

Thermal Conductivity

[W m-1 K-1] OMEGA (Carbon Fiber) 150 2.2*

CARBON FOAM (K9) - 25 TITANIUM PIPE (i.d. 1.5 mm) 100 7.2 CARBON-FOAM/CARBON-FIBER GLUE 200 1**

CARBON-FOAM/PIPE GLUE 200 1**

CHIP/CARBON-FIBER GLUE 70 1***

CHIP (silicon) 250 148 BONDING (tin + 3.5% argent) 300 6.32 SENSOR (silicon) 200 148 INNER SUPPORT TUBE – IST (Carbon fiber) 1000 2.2*

* Assumed as isotropic** Stycast 2850FT, manufacturer declared value: 1.02 W m-1 K-1

*** Electrolub HTCP, manufacturer declared value: 2.5 W m-1 K-1

- Perfect thermal contact between different layers in the CFD simulations

Page 5: CFD thermal simulations IBL

E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure 5

-40 °C

250°C

17th July 2012

Convection

3. Boundary Conditions

�̇�=h (𝑇 −𝑇 ∞)

with :

. .

Bake-out case

𝑇 ∞=30 °𝐶

Page 6: CFD thermal simulations IBL

E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure 6

-40 °C

Adiabatic

17th July 2012

Convection

3. Boundary Conditions

with :

. .

Nominal case

�̇�=h (𝑇 −𝑇 ∞)

𝑇 ∞=30 °𝐶

100W / stave

Page 7: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 7E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

4. CFD simulations settings

- Nitrogen flow rate =0kg/s

- Natural convection of nitrogen taken into account

- Radiative heat transfer transfer taken into account (emissivity

of 0.05 for the Beam Pipe, 1 for other surfaces)

- Dependence of nitrogen properties on temperature taken into

account

- Laminar natural convection flow

Page 8: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 8E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

B. CFD Simulations

1. Bake-out case

2. Nominal case

3. Summary table

Page 9: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 9E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

1. Bake-out

Insulation : 0mm

-36°C

76°C

Page 10: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 10E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

1. Bake-out

Insulation : 2mm

-36°C

53°C

Page 11: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 11E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

1. Bake-out

Insulation : 4mm

-36°C

47°C

Page 12: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 12E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

2. Running nominal

Insulation : 0mm

-17°C

-26°C

Page 13: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 13E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

2. Running nominal

Insulation : 2mm

-17°C

-26°C

Page 14: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 14E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

2. Running nominal

Insulation : 4mm

-17°C

-26°C

Page 15: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 15E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

3. Summary table

Geometry Case Insulation Temperature

      Tsensor max T IPT max

      convect  

    mm °C °C

IBL Only Bake-Out 0 -36 76

IBL Only Bake-Out 2 -36 53

IBL Only Bake-Out 4 -36 47

IBL Only Nominal 0 -17 -26

IBL Only Nominal 2 -17 -26

IBL Only Nominal 4 -17 -26

Page 16: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 16E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

C. Comparison with previous results

1. Bake-out case

2. Nominal case

Page 17: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 17E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

Summary table

Geometry Case InsulationT∞ T IPT max

convect + IPT convect adiabmm °C °C °C

IBL Only Bake-Out 0 30 -36 76IBL Only Bake-Out 2 10 -37 -36IBL Only Bake-Out 2 30 -36 -37 -36 53IBL Only Bake-Out 2 60 -37 -36IBL Only Bake-Out 4 30 -36 47IBL Only Nominal 0 30 -17 -26IBL Only Nominal 2 10 -24 -25IBL Only Nominal 2 30 -17 -23 -25 -26IBL Only Nominal 2 60 -22 -25IBL Only Nominal 4 30 -17 -26Services Bake out 2 10 -30 -31Services Bake out 2 30 -28 -31Services Bake out 2 60 -25 -31Services Bake out safe 2 10 46 48Services Bake out safe 2 30 51 48Services Bake out safe 2 60 60 48Services Nominal 2 10 7 8Services Nominal 2 30 22 8Services Nominal 2 60 41 8

TemperatureTsensor max

Page 18: CFD thermal simulations IBL

14th August 2012 18E. Da Riva, A.L. Lamure

Thank you for your attention !