5
CENTRE OF STUDIES FOR BUILDING SURVEYING FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND SURVEYING UNIVERSITITEKNOLOGI MARA COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL BETWEEN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND SARAWAK GRACE ANAKJABU (2010969073) Academic Project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Building Surveying (Hons) Centre of Studies for Building Surveying Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying January 2013

CENTRE OF STUDIES FOR BUILDING SURVEYING ...ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/16513/1/PPb_GRACE ANAK JABU AP...legislation system that has been used between peninsular Malaysia and Sarawak

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • CENTRE OF STUDIES FOR BUILDING SURVEYINGFACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND SURVEYING

    UNIVERSITITEKNOLOGI MARA

    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL BETWEEN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND SARAWAK

    GRACE ANAKJABU (2010969073)

    Academic Project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for thedegree of

    Bachelor of Building Surveying (Hons)Centre of Studies for Building Surveying

    Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying

    January 2013

  • CENTRE OF STUDIES FOR BUILDING SURVEYINGFACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND SURVEYING

    UNIVERSITITEKNOLOGI MARA

    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL BETWEEN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND SARAWAK

    “I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS ACADEMIC PROJECT IS THE RESULT OF MY OWN RESEARCH EXCEPT FOR THE QUOTATION

    AND SUMMARY WHICH HAVE BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED”

    Student’s Name

    Signature

    UITMNo

    Date

    Grace Anak Jabu

    2010969073

    January 21st 2013

  • CENTRE OF STUDIES FOR BUILDING SURVEYINGFACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND SURVEYING

    UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

    ACADEMIC REPORT

    BSB608 & BSB 658

    CONFIRMATION OF ACADEMIC PROJECT AMENDMENTS

    This is to confirm that the student has amended her academic project as directed and therefore allowed to compiles

    MARK GRADE

    6* bStudent’s Name

    UITM No

    Title

    Supervisor’s Name

    Signature

    Date

    : Grace Anak Jabu

    : 2010969073

    : Comparative Study of Building Plan Approval between Peninsular Malaysia and Sarawak

    Sr Hikmah Binti Kamarudin

  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    An a great deal thanks is owed to my supervisor, Mrs. Hikmah Binti

    Kamarudin for support to the project topic and agreeing to supervise my work. Her

    guidance and stimulating discussions have inspired a genuine interest in the subject,

    and the project as a whole has given me an invaluable insight into scientism research.

    I would also like to thanks to my parents and all the parties for their help in

    my research.

  • CHAPTER 1

    INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH

    1.1 Introduction

    Malaysia was constituted in 16 September 1963 that consisting of Malaya

    State, Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore. Malaysia established to form political

    cooperation, economy and block communist influence. On august 1965, Singapore

    further appeared from Malaysia in order to be a republic (arkid.gov.com). After

    Malaya Federal has achieved independence in 1957, that make Sarawak start to

    discuss about their independence. Sarawak only enter Malaysia when is special

    protection to keep their interest such as law, services, custom such as are included in

    Federal Constitution Malaysia. Culture and Sarawak faith is different from

    peninsular Malaysia and rich with natural resources such as forest and petroleum.

    When Sarawak become one of Malaysia, Sarawak want to ensure freedom and

    control that all of that including Sarawak lifestyle. This is reason why Sarawak has

    special protection and more power in Federal Constitution Malaysia compared to

    peninsular Malaysia (malaysiabar.org.my).

    Although Sarawak has been a part of Malaysia but administration and

    legislation system that has been used between peninsular Malaysia and Sarawak very

    difference. That difference can see in town and planning system between Sarawak

    and peninsular Malaysia which Sarawak uses a land development legal system

    different with peninsular Malaysia. The difference administration and legislation that

    used in both of them make any procedure that involved in construction industry

    Page | 2

    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL BETWEEN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND SARAWAKACKNOWLEDGEMENTTABLE OF CONTENTCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH1.1 Introduction1.2 Issue and Problem Statement1.3 Objective of the Study1.4 Scope of the Study1.5 BRIEF RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

    Chapter 2 Literature Review2.1 Introduction2.2 Building Control in Building Plan Approval2.3 The Authority and Department Involved in Building plan approval2.3.1 The Authority and Department in Peninsular Malaysia2.3.2 The Authority and Department in Sarawak2.3.3 The Relevant Technical Department or Agencies

    2.4 Land Development Legal System in Malaysia2.4.1 The National Land Code 1965 (Act 56 of 1965)2.4.2 The National Land Code for Penang and Malacca Titles Act 19632.4.3 The Sarawak Land Code Chapter 812.4.4 The Sabah Land Ordinance Chapter 68

    2.5 Legislation and Regulation Related in Building Plan Approval2.5.1 Introduction2.5.2 Legislation and regulation related in Peninsular Malaysia2.5.3 Other Relevant Act in Peninsular Malaysia2.5.4 Legislation and Regulation Related to in Sarawak2.5.6 Other Relevant Act in Sarawak

    Chapter 3 Research Methodology3.1 Introduction

    Chapter 4 CASE STUDYIntroduction4.1 Background of Kuala Lumpur4.1.1 Administration Area of Kuala Lumpur City Hall4.1.2 Organization Chart4.1.3 Department of Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL)4.1.4 One Stop Centre (OSC) in DBKL

    4.2 Background of the Commission of the City of Kuching North (DBKU)4.2.1 Organisation Chart4.2.2 Department under the Commission of the City of Kuching North (DBKU)

    Chapter 5 Finding and AnalysisIntroduction5.1 Development Approval Related5.2 Building Plan Submission5.3 Building plan approval5.3.2 Step of Building Plan Approval in Sarawak

    5.4 Involved Technical Department or Agencies

    Chapter 6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS6.1 Conclusions6.2 Recommendations

    REFERENCEAPPENDIX