Cell Membrane

(Target Of RF)

SignalTransduction

BiochemicalResponse

milliseconds seconds minutes

Time to SensePresence of RF

Time to DetermineCoherence

of RF

Time to Interpret & Induce

Biochemical Protective Responses

The Biological Mechanism

The Nature of the Solution

• Develop a nano-technology that would stop the biological effects from occurring at the cell-membrane level

• If the biological effects did not occur, then there would be no consequent health effects

• The theoretical solution had been studied and developed as the Noise Field Principle

The Noise Field Principle

• Information carrying signal in wireless communication

• The constant repetitive

pattern triggers biological protective responses

• Protective responses lead to disease

• Random ELF or “noise field”

• Random fields do not induce protective biological responses and thus do not lead to disease

• The “Protection-effect”: Superimposing a random noise field on a bio-effecting field miti- gates the induced biological effects.

Confirmation that “Noise Field” Technology Inhibits Dangerous Biological Responses

Catholic University

of America

Columbia University

University of Washington (Seattle)

University of Western Ontario (Canada)

Aarhus University (Denmark)

Inhibited Enhanced Cell Proliferation Inhibited Enhanced

Gene Expression

Inhibited Reduction inBrain Enzyme Activity

Inhibited Enhanced Growth Enzyme Activity, Stress Protein Levels,and Embryo Abnormalities

Inhibited Memory Loss in RatsInhibited EMF Induced DNA Strand Breaks**

Example with Genetic Damage

• Genetic damage leads to the development of tumors

• Dr. Henry Lai has published studies on the Noise Field effect as it relates to DNA damage

• The technique he used was the Comet Assay

CELL PHONE-INDUCEDDNA DAMAGE - COMET ASSAY

1. Rats are exposed to RF radiation

2. DNA repair mechanisms are disrupted resulting in formation of DNA fragments

4. DNA is stained and visualized

3. Electric field is applied to DNA to see migration patterns, damaged DNA produces a “comet tail”

The “Noise Field” stopped the damage

RF exposed cells

DNA Patterns

RF exposed cellsPlus Noise Field

Unexposed cells

2 hour exposure to cell phone radiation

Lai et. al. University of Washington

Other Inhibition Effects of Applied “Noise Field”

Laboratory Model Bio-Marker EMF Effect

Catholic U.

Catholic U.

Catholic U.

Catholic U.

Catholic U.

W. Ontario U.

Columbia U.

Columbia U.

Columbia U.

Aarhus U.

Zhejiang U.

Zhejiang U.

Murine cells

Human lymphoma

Chick embryos

Chick embryos

Chick embryos

Human leukemia

Breast cancer

Brain cells

Human amniocytes

Lung cells

Lung cells

Chick embryos

ODC

ODC

ODC

Abnormalities

Nucleotidase

Stress proteins

C-myc

Stress proteins

Dopamine

Proliferation

Receptor clusters

Phosphorylation

Increase

Increase

Increase

Increase

Increase

Increase

Increase

Increase

Increase

Increase

Decrease

Decrease

Zhejiang U. Murine fibroblasts Gap junctions Decrease

Development of the MRET

• The basis for the technology

• Fractal geometry

• EMR induced systematic stress on polymer (Piezoelectric Effect)

• Induce “noise field” as result of systematic Piezoelectric Effect

THE FRACTAL MATRIX CHARACTERISTICS THE FRACTAL MATRIX CHARACTERISTICS OF MRET –Chip POLYMER MATERIALOF MRET –Chip POLYMER MATERIAL

1 MRET –Chip

material is a fractal matrix composed of nano-circles.

External electromagnetic radiation generates electric current in nano-circles.

It is a source of MRET low frequency signals beneficial for living cells

Superposition Principle of Electromagnetic Superposition Principle of Electromagnetic OscillationsOscillations

Low-frequency

Microwave radiation – high frequency band in the range of 800 MHz – 1.3 GHz;

Electromagnetic signals generated by MRET-chip volumetric fractal matrix – low frequency band in the range of approximately 5 Hz – 25 Hz;

When a number of high frequency and low frequency waves are collocated and superimposed the total wave displacement is the algebraic sum of the displacements of individual waves.

Resulting frequency patterns can resonate with cellular structures and at the same time they are incoherent to cellular membrane “stress responsive mechanism”.

High-frequency

High-frequency Low-frequency Superimposed

Wilson, B.W., Morris, J.E., Flanagan, R., Anderson, L.E. “Evidence of an effect of ELF electromagnetic fields on human pineal gland function,” Journal of Pineal Research, 1990, 9(4): 259-269

Substantiation of the Product

• SAR Tests• Live Blood Cell Analysis• Blood Flow Analysis• VibraImage Test• EEG Tests• Multiple Biological Tests• High-Voltage Photography

– At this point, I would add some of the substantiation slides as decided by Dr. Smirnoff– Dr. Smirnov should talk about his personal story – how he came to do this work etc.– Save the rest for Q & A

The Effect of MRET Polymer The Effect of MRET Polymer Compound on SAR Values of RF Compound on SAR Values of RF

PhonesPhones

• Test was conducted at RF Exposure Laboratory, Escondido, California in June – July of 2006.

• Test includes measurement of experimental points inside the “phantom head” for three different models of RF phones functioning at 835 MHz and 1900 MHz respectfully (252 points were measured for each RF phone with and without application of MRET polymer compound).

• The APREL Laboratories ALSAS system with a dosimetric E-field probe E-020 was used for the measurements.

““High Impact Area” Area Scan DiagramsHigh Impact Area” Area Scan Diagrams

• The application of MRET polymer to RF phones does not significantly affect the air measurements of RF phone signals and subsequently does not lead to any significant distortion of transmitted RF signals.

• The incorporation of MRET polymer material in the RF phones shows that “High Impact Areas” remained in the same location as without the MRET polymer and their amplitudes decreased in 90% of data points.

• The incorporation of MRET polymeric material in the RF phones leads to the reduction of the majority of SAR values. SAR values in this experiment were reduced by up to 29.0%

Without MRET polymer material With MRET polymer material

BLOOD TESTS RESULTSBLOOD TESTS RESULTS

• The blood tests were conducted at the laboratory of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

• Tests were conducted on 22 blood samples. Each sample was split into three groups.

• One group was a control group and two others were exposed to EMR of computer display at the distance of 15” for one hour period of time with MRET-Chip protection and without MRET-Chip protection respectively.

• After exposure to EMR all three groups of blood samples were tested on Cell-dyn 1600 specimen equipment. The results were compared with the control group.

• The results are statistically valid, p < 0.01

BLOOD FLOW ANALYSISBLOOD FLOW ANALYSIS

• Blood Flow Analyzer Test (Micro-sonar System) conducted by Gabriel Inoue, Tokyo, Japan.

The most informative parameters of the Blood Flow diagrams are the Peak Values of the blood flow speed (maximum and minimum values). This test shows that after the 20 minutes of exposure of the human subject to the mobile phone radiation the blood flow rate “jumped” from the average range of 1 cm/sec – 6.6 cm/sec to the much higher average range of 0 cm/sec – 14.4 cm/sec. The substantial alteration in the range of the blood flow pulsation can negatively affect the function and plasticity of the blood circulatory system. For reference, the smoking of one cigarette leads to the increase of the blood flow rate to 0 cm/sec – 21.0 cm/sec.

• The installation of MRET Chip chip on the mobile phone dramatically changed the physiological effect of the mobile phone radiation on the human subject. The blood flow rate fluctuates from (control) 1.0 cm/sec – 6.6 cm/sec to the range of 1.0 cm/sec – 5.8 cm/sec.

Blood Flow diagram before the exposure

to mobile phone radiation

Blood Flow diagram after the 20 minutes of exposure

without MRET Chip

Blood Flow diagram after the 20 minutes of exposure

with MRET Chip

VIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-VIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-ChipChip

• This research was conducted at Elsys Corp. in St. Petersburg, Russia. It was designed to investigate whether microwave (MW) radiation of mobile phone can induce changes in the human’s physiological state.

• This research included the testing of MRET-Chip (United States Patent No. 6,369,399 B1) and three other competitive neutralizers: made in Japan (JP), made in Russia (RU), and made in Taiwan (TW), in order to determine their effects as protective devices against MW radiation negative physiological effects.

• MW effects were studied on mobile phone Nokia, model 3310 operating in the frequency range of 895-917MHz, with power output in the range of 0.002–2W, and SAR value less than 5.4mW/kg.

VIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-ChipVIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-Chip

The image of a subject in “FM” mode before and after 5 minutes exposure of the human subject to the

mobile phone radiation in talk mode without MRET-Chip.

The image of a subject in “FM” mode before and after 5 minutes exposure of the human

subject to the mobile radiation in talk mode with MRET-Chip.

VIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-ChipVIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-Chip

• The comparison of VibraImage method of measurement of the human body frequencies with EEG testing methodology shows direct correlation between the brain waves and the body micro-vibration frequencies.

• The histograms show the difference in the Frequency Distributions of human body vibrations before and after the exposure of the human subject to the mobile phone radiation in talk mode without protection.

• It is possible to notice that the installation of MRET-Chip on the mobile phone makes the difference almost indistinguishable.

“FM” mode: the histograms of human body Frequency Distribution before (red diagram) and after (blue diagram) 5 minutes exposure to the mobile

phone in talk mode without MRET-Chip

“FM” mode: the histograms of human body Frequency Distribution before (red diagram) and after (blue diagram) 5 minutes exposure to the mobile phone in talk mode

with MRET-Chip.

VIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-ChipVIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-Chip Comparing to the exposure to the mobile

phone without any neutralizer, MRET-Chip significantly reduced the level of changes of the Mean Values of Frequencies and of the Widths of Frequency Range, and consequently the level of changes of physiological state of human body. Top diagram shows that the exposure to the mobile phone induced 10.3% average level of changes in the Mean Values of Frequencies. Comparing to the exposure to mobile phone without any neutralizer, MRET-Chip significantly reduced the level of changes of the Mean Value of Frequencies. MRET-Chip reduced the average level of changes by 46% (from 10.3% to 5.6%).

• Bottom diagram shows that the exposure to the mobile phone induced 9.2% average level of changes in the Width of Frequency Range. Comparing to the exposure to the mobile phone without any neutralizer, MRET-Chip significantly reduced the level of changes of the Width of the Frequency Range. MRET-Chip reduced the average level of changes by 34%. The results are statistically significant (p<0.001).

Mean Values of ΔMVF Calculated for 10 Tested Subjects

Mean Values of ΔWFR Calculated for 10 Tested Subjects

EEG TESTS RESULTSEEG TESTS RESULTS

• The EEG tests were conducted at the laboratory of SA Biomedical Instrumentation Co., California. These tests were conducted on the human subject introduced to the influence of electromagnetic radiation generated by cellular phone with MRET-Chip protection and without MRET-Chip protection respectively.

• The cellular phone was located in standard operating position at the right side of a head. The head of the human subject was covered with a standard Electro-cap E1-L connected with a four channel SAI Bioelectric Amplifier that includes Analog Processor and Anti-aliasing Filters. The physiological data were provided from the following electrodes: C4, Fz, F4, and T4 .

MRET-Chip

MRET-Chip

HIGH-VOLTAGE HIGH-VOLTAGE PHOTOGRAPHY TEST ON PHOTOGRAPHY TEST ON

PLANT LEAVESPLANT LEAVES

• The living cells produce these luminous fringes via a physical process known as cold emission of electrons.

• The solid image of a leaf not exposed to computer display radiation means that all cells of the leaf are alive and function properly.

• The image of a leaf exposed to EMR without any protection dramatically reduced. Only about 40% of the cells survived.

• The image of a leaf exposed to EMR with MRET-Chip protection shows that about 90% of the cells survived.

• It proves that MRET-Chip neutralizes the harmful effect of EMR on living organisms.

MRET-Chip Technology Credentials• US Patent No. 6369399, Granted on April 2002 by USPTO “Electromagnetic

Radiation Shielding Material and Device”

• MRET-Chip Technology Research Validations: Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles SI Biomedical Instrumentation Co., San Diego Tex Chu Corp. Laboratory, Taipei, Taiwan RF Exposure Laboratory, California Elsys Scientific Corp., S. Petersburg, Russia Elixir Health Ltd. , Singapore

• Scientific Publications: Explore Magazine USA. RSO magazine (Radiation Safety Associates), USA.

Abstract, The First Asian and Oceanic Congress for Radiation Protection (AOCRP-1), Korea.

Abstract, Asia-Pacific EMF Conference, Thailand Abstract, Biological Effects of EMFs 3rd International Conference, Greece Abstract, 26th Annual Conference of Bioelectromagnetics Society,

USA