Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Daniel H Ward DDS
May 14, 2016
Let’s Be Direct:Plain Talk about Perfecting
Esthetic Posterior Restorations
CDA-Anaheim
Daniel H Ward DDS
Graduated 1979 OSU
Private Practice‐Columbus, Ohio
Assistant Clinical Professor The Ohio State University‐13 years
Daniel H Ward DDS
Fellow Academy of General Dentistry
Fellow American College of Dentists
Fellow International College of Dentists
Fellow American Society for Dental Aesthetics
Associate Member American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry
Daniel H Ward DDS
Reviewer‐Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Reviewer‐Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Member and Evaluator for Catapult
Lecturer and Chief Examiner University of Minnesota Post‐Graduate Program in Esthetic Dentistry‐20 years
“I get by with a little help from my friends…”Dr Harry Albers
Dr Paul Belvedere
Dr John Burgess
Dr Mark Canon
Dr Gordon Christensen
Dr George Freedman
Dr Galip Gürel
Dr Geoff Knight
Dr Doug Lambert
Dr Karl Leinfelder
Dr Graeme Milicich
Dr Buddy Mopper
Dr Jeff Morley
Dr Brian Novy
Dr Jorge Perdagão
Dr Steve Rosenstiel
Dr Robert Seghi
Dr Irwin Smigel
Dr Byong Suh
Dr Ed Swift
“I get by with a little help from my friends…”AdDent
BISCO
Caulk/Dentsply
Centrix
Clinicians’ Choice
Coltene/Whaledent
GC America
Heraeus Kulzer
Ivoclar
Kerr
Pulpdent
Shofu
SDI
SSWhite
Tokuyama
Triodent
3‐M
VOCO
2
Some Images May be:
Cropped
Rotated
Levels adjusted
No Images were: Site adjusted
Enhance to produce a better result
Composite
The most USED
and ABUSED
Material in Dentistry
Composite
Marginal Integrity
Composite Direct Placement Challenges
Expose ends of enamel rods
EnamelEnamel Enamel Bonding
96% inorganic carbonate hydroxyapatite 96% inorganic carbonate hydroxyapatite calcium phosphatecalcium phosphate
4% organic (tyrosine rich amelogenin 4% organic (tyrosine rich amelogenin protein) and waterprotein) and water
Enamel rods 4Enamel rods 4--8 microns in diameter8 microns in diameter Bonding occurs within enamel rodsBonding occurs within enamel rods HydrophobicHydrophobic
3
Sheared enamel Sheared enamel rodsrods
White Lines
Unprepared MarginsExpose fresh ends of the enamel rods
with a very fine diamond
Koase K, Inoue S, Noda M, Tanaka T et al. Effect of burKoase K, Inoue S, Noda M, Tanaka T et al. Effect of bur--cut dentin on bond strength cut dentin on bond strength using two allusing two all--inin--one and one twoone and one two--step adhesive systems. step adhesive systems. J Adhes DentJ Adhes Dent. 2004;6:97. 2004;6:97--104.104.
Hosoya Y, Shinkawa H, Suefiji C, Nozaka Ket al. Effects of diamHosoya Y, Shinkawa H, Suefiji C, Nozaka Ket al. Effects of diamond bur particle ond bur particle size on dentin bond strength. size on dentin bond strength. Am J DentAm J Dent. 2004;17:359. 2004;17:359--364.364.
Use a fine 25 micron diamond when using self-etching primers
Exposing ends of enamel rods resulting inGreater angle than direction of enamel rods
Better bonding and less shearing of enamel rods
Class II Interproximal Margin Preparation
4
Expose the ends of the enamel rods to avoid tooth fracture at margins
Class II Interproximal Margin Preparation
Composite Composite PreparationPreparation
Amalgam Amalgam PreparationPreparation
Bevel Interproximal Enamel for better bonding and less shearing of enamel rods
Class II Interproximal Margin Preparation
Importance of flaring Class II Interproximals
Fractured tooth structure
Importance of flaring Class II Interproximals
Parallel preparation
Importance of flaring Class II Interproximals
Result
Post-Operative Sensitivity
Composite Direct Placement Challenges
Hydrodynamic Theory
5
Hydrodynamic Theory
Fluid flow within dentinal tubules causes PAINBrannstrom M. The Cause of post restorative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod 1986;12:475-481.
Hydrodynamic Theory
Opened, unsealed dentinal tubules causes PAIN
DentinDentinPlacement of Resin Primer
Apply multiple coats
Dentin Bonding
70% inorganic carbonate hydroxyapatite 70% inorganic carbonate hydroxyapatite calcium phosphatecalcium phosphate
30% organic (collagen) and water30% organic (collagen) and water
Dentinal tubules 0.06Dentinal tubules 0.06--3 microns in diameter3 microns in diameter
Most Bonding occurs between dentinal tubulesMost Bonding occurs between dentinal tubules
HydrophilicHydrophilic
Demineralize surfaceExpose collagen fibersRemove smear layer Increase porosity of intertubular dentinOpen up dentinal tubules Increase surface area
Etched Dentin
6
•Total Etch Technique Fill and Occlude open dentinal tubules
Bonding agent should not leave the dentinal tubules open
Method #1-Reducing Post-Op Sensitivity
Placement of Etchant
Total Etch Technique
“Moist” Dentin”
Rinsing of Etchant
Moist Moist
Placement of Resin Primer
“Overwet” Phenomenon
Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei Sh. The overwet phenomenon: a scanning electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent. 1996;9(3):109-114.
Overdrying
Gwinnett AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent. 1994;7(3):144-148.
Collapsed collagen fibrils
Overdrying
SEM Perdigao
Un-collapsed collagen fibrils Collapsed collagen fibrils
7
Proper Moisture Moisture Variability
Air only syringe Warm air dryer
Air/water syringe Air/water syringe
Evaporating the solvent with dry air
Bond StrengthSensitivity
Variability
Lopez CL, Perdigao J, Lopes M et al. Dentin Bond Strengths of Simplified Adhesives:Effect of Dentin Depth. Compendium. 2006;27(6):340-345.
17.6(+/-5.9)
18.4(+/-4.8)
14.2(+/-7.0)
Deep
Dentin
21.0(+/-7.4)
18.9(+/-4.1)
22.1(+/-2.8)
Superficial
Dentin
Clearfil
Liner
Bond
Optibond
Solo
Single Bond
Adhesive
System
Mean shear bond strength in MPa
Effect of Dentin Depth on Bond Strengths
•Occludes tubules
•Anti-bacterial
GLUMA
8
•Occlusions
Total Etch Technique
Summary
Most technique sensitiveRequires proper attention to detailUse in ideal sized preparations
Total Etch Technique
Materials-4th
Generation
Acetone solvent Alcohol solvent
Total Etch Technique
Materials-5th
Generation
Acetone solvent Alcohol solvent
•Self Etch Technique Never leave the dentinal tubules open
Bonding agent should not leave the dentinal tubules open
Method #2-Reducing Post-Op Sensitivity
Acid-groupsHydrophilic end
etches tooth structure (self
limiting)
Spacer-chainlink between
functional groups
Methacrylate-groupHydrophobic end
connects to polymer-network
COOH
COOH
CH 2
CH 2
O
OO
O
Self-Etching Primer
9
“Self Etching” PrimerAcidifying Primer accompanies etch
Acid reaction is self-limiting Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R.. Resin Tags do not contribute to dentin adhesion in self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(2):97-103 .
Resin Tags do not Contribute to Dentin Adhesion in SE Adhesion
Self-Etch Technique
Challenges
Decreased bond strength to un-etched enamel
Marginal gap formation with un-etched enamel
Bond incompatibility to self-cure and dual-cure resins
More susceptible to hydrolytic degradation resulting in significantly diminished bond strengths over time
Self etching Primer
37% H3PO4 etched Unprepared enamel surface for 15s. Popular SE primer etched Unprepared enamel surface
10
•Tests confirm that preparing the enamel margin improves bond strength especially with self-etch dentin bonding agents
Substrate All-Bond UniversalSelf-Etch
All-Bond UniversalTotal-Etch
Uncut Enamel 18.7±6.7 31.4±7.1
Cut Enamel 29.0±5.5 35.6±3.6
Bisco in-house data.. Lee IS, Son SA, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. The effect of additional etching and curing mechanism of composite resin on the dentin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5:467-484.
55% improvement
Effect of Enamel Etching-Bond Strength
•Tests show that etching uncut enamel with phosphoric acid increases bond strength to enamel with 1- bottle dentin bonding agents
Substrate All-Bond UniversalSelf-Etch
All-Bond UniversalTotal-Etch
Uncut Enamel 18.7±6.7 31.4±7.1
Cut Enamel 29.0±5.5 35.6±3.6
Bisco in-house data.. Lee IS, Son SA, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. The effect of additional etching and curing mechanism of composite resin on the dentin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5:467-484.
67% improvement
Effect of Enamel Etching-Bond Strength
Substrate All-Bond UniversalSelf-Etch
All-Bond UniversalTotal-Etch
Uncut Enamel 18.7±6.7 31.4±7.1
Cut Enamel 29.0±5.5 35.6±3.6
Bisco in-house data.. Lee IS, Son SA, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. The effect of additional etching and curing mechanism of composite resin on the dentin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5:467-484.
22% improvement
Effect of Enamel Etching-Bond Strength
•Tests show that etching cut enamel with phosphoric acid increases bond strength to enamel with 1- bottle dentin bonding agents
Solution: “Etching prepared enamel w phosphoric acid promoted better marginal integrity with self-etching bonding agents.”
Souza-Junior EJ, Prieto LT, Araújo CT, Paulillo LA. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2012;37:195-204.
Effect of Enamel Etching-Marginal Gaps
When the pH of a dentin bonding agent is too low (more acidic), tertiary amines (necessary for the polymerization reaction) are deactivated resulting in bond incompatibility with self and dual cured resins.
Bond Incompatibility with Self and Dual Cured Resins
Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual -cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:267-282.
Solution: Use of a higher pH (>3.0)self-etching dentin bonding agent does not inactivate the tertiary amines and allows for polymerization.
Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual -cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:267-282.
Bond Incompatibility with Self and Dual Cured Resins
pH=3.2
11
Solution: Use a dual-cure activator
Bond Incompatibility with Self and Dual Cured Resins
“The cured layer of 1-step self-etching adhesives is hydrophilic and a permeable membrane.”
Tay F, Suh B, Pahsley D, Carvalho R. Single Layer Adhesives are Permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371-382.
Hydrolytic Degradation
Solution: Use 2 layers-a hydrophilic layer covered with a hydrophobic layer
Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Tori Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Self-assembled nano-kayering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;9:376-381.
Hydrolytic Degradation
Solution: Use MDP containing bonding agents which become hydrophobic upon polymerization due to high amount of cross-linkage.“MDP-containing adhesives form nano-layering at the adhesive interface. Stable MDP-Ca salt deposition along with nano-layering may explain the high stability of MDP-based bonding.”
Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Tori Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Self-assembled nano-kayering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;9:376-381.
Hydrolytic Degradation
Self Etch Technique
OptiBond XTR
6th generation DBA that effectively etches enamel
Unprepared enamel surface
Etched with 37% Phosphoric Acid OptiBond XTR 6th Generation DBA
Popular 6th Generation DBA Popular 7th Generation DBA
Swift E, et al. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011;23(6):390-398.
12
Self Etch Technique
OptiBond XTR
Self Etch Technique
OptiBond XTR
2 component self-etch 15% filled by volumeHydrophilic acidic self-etching primer with
enhanced etching capabilitiesHydrophobic adhesive to maximize
material compatibility, increase strength and promote bond durability
Self Etch Technique
OptiBond XTR
Primer contain acetone, alcohol and water solvents
Low film thickness (5 micron)Bonds to gold, non-precious metal,
zirconia, porcelain Direct and indirect restorative procedures
Seventh Generation DBA
BeautibondDual acidic monomersLow film thickness (5 micron)RadiopaqueEasy to use-single application 10 sec
Self Etch Technique
Materials 6th & 7th
Generation
Sixth Generation Seventh Generation
All-Bond SE Clearfil SE Protect
BeautiBond G-BondOptibondXTR
Selective Etch TechniqueApply etch to enamel only for 15 secondsWash thoroughlyPlace self-etching primer
Frankerger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered:better than etch-and-rinse and self etch? J. Adhes Dent. 2008;10:339-344.
13
Selective Etch TechniqueHigh Viscosity allows precise placementContains BAC
Selective Etch TechniqueAllows total etch or self etch of enamel
and/or dentin
G-aenial Bond
Selective Etch TechniquePrecursor to “Universal” Bonding agentsBond strength same to total vs self etch
Dentin Bond Strength
Self-Etch Total Etch Moist
Total Etch Wet
Total, Self or Selective Etch Universal Bonding
Materials
Self‐etch Selective‐etch Total‐etch
Total-etch, self-etch or selective-etch technique
Can be used for direct and indirect restorations
Bond to all indirect substrates-metal, ceramics, zirconia, porcelain and lithium disilicate.
Compatible with light-cured, self-cured and dual-cured composite and luting cements.
Universal Bonding Materials
Total, Self or Selective Etch MDP Universal
Bonding Materials
Total, Self or Selective Etch
14
Universal Bonding Materials
Total, Self or Selective Etch
Decay Removal
Composite Direct Placement Challenges
Thoroughly remove decay only
Amalgam Preparation
Composite Preparation
“Convenience”Form MID Lifetime of tooth often determined by first dentist
intervention
Minimally Invasive Dentistry
Fissurotomy bur
201.3VF
Conservative Tooth Preparation
169L330
Low Viscosity Flowable Composite
How do you restore?
15
G-aenial Universal Flo
Homogeneous spherical particles
High Viscosity (Low Flow) Flowable Composite
Mean particle size 200 nm Particle size range 40-5000 nm
G-aenial U Flo Conventional Nano-hybrid
G-aenial Universal Flo
Homogeneous spherical particles
Good wear resistance
High flexural strength (167 MPa)
Filled 50% by volume
Good polishability
Blends in well
High Viscosity (Low Flow) Flowable Composite
High Viscosity (Low Flow) Flowable Composite
Beautifil Flow 00
Unique glass ionomer filler particles
Releases fluoride and other ions
Neutralizes pH-Antibacterial
Good polishability
Visibly blends in well
S-PRG (Surface pre-treated Glass Ionomer)
Intra-oral plaque formation(24 hours W/O Brushing)
Less plaque Full-grown plaque
BEAUTIFIL Ⅱ(Containing S-PRG filler)
Conventional Restorative Material
(Not containing S-PRG filler)
plaque
S PRG Fillers
Reduced Plaque Accumulation
Dispenser Gun
Tray
Compule Tray
Warmer
CALSETThermal Assisted Light Polymerization
WARMER
Improved flowability of composites
Improved marginal adaptation
Improved rate of polymer conversion
Improved surface hardness/durability/polishing.
Decreased curing time and increased depth of cure
Increased sculptability and ease in shaping anatomy
ADVANTAGESADVANTAGESThermal Assisted Light PolymerizationThermal Assisted Light Polymerization
Stansbury JW. Use of near-IR to monitor the influence of external heating on dental composite photopolymerization. Dent Mat 2004; 20(8).
16
Dispenser Gun TrayComax Dispenser
CALSETCALSETThermal Assisted Light PolymerizationThermal Assisted Light Polymerization
Low Viscosity Flowable Composite & Warmed Composite
Completed Tooth Restorations
Recurrent Decay
Composite Direct Placement Challenges
Composite Alternatives
Oral Environment Challenges-Xerostomia
“40% of all prescription drugs have dry mouth listed in the PDR as a possible side effect”
Chalmers J. Personal Communication. 2006.Chalmers J. Personal Communication. 2006.
Oral Environment Challenges-Xerostomia
• Incidence increases with # of drugs taken
• 50% of patients taking 4 or more medications had Dry Mouth
Oral Environment Challenges-Carbohydrates
Nutrition Facts: Serving Size: 8.3 fl. oz Calories: 140 Total Fat: 0g Sodium: 200mg Protein: 0g Total Carbohydrates: 28g Sugars: 28g
Nutrition Facts:16 fl oz; calories 140; total fat 0g; sodium 220mg; potassium 60mg; total carbs 28g; sugars 28g
17
Oral Environment Challenges-Bottled Water
Fluoride-less water Fluoridated water
Oral Environment Challenges-Illegal Drugs
“Meth mouth” or chronic marijuana use
Xerostomia patients
High carbohydrate users
Non-fluoridated water users
Drug abusers
Need TherapeuticRestorations
Composite Challenges
•Post-operative sensitivity
•Recurrent decay
•Achieving proper moisture
•Polymerization shrinkage
•Increased time-layering
•Technique sensitivity
Low post-op sensitivity
Fluoride Release
Moisture variability
No shrinkage
Bulk placement
Simple-more forgiving
Glass Ionomer
Glass Ionomers (Self-Cured)
Glass Ionomer Family
Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers
(Dual Cured)
•More highly filled-reduced wear
•Self-curing in 2.5-5 minutes
•No polymerization (setting) shrinkage stress
•Expansion/contraction similar to tooth
•High fluoride release
•Bioactive
Glass IonomerCharacteristics
18
•Multiple cervical carious lesions
•Pediatric Patients
•Sealants
•Class V restorations
•Sandwich Technique
•Crown buildups
•Long term interim restorations
•Cements
Glass Ionomer Uses
Fuji IX
Glass Ionomer Bases
RIVA SC FX-II
Gain access to decay using a high speed
Closed Sandwich Technique
Use slow speed and then spoon excavator
Stop if you feel you will expose pulp
SEM of dentin treated with PCA
Condition dentin with poly-acrylic acid for 10 seconds and wash
Closed Sandwich Technique
CARD
OS
O et al. J D
ent 2010
Condition enamel only with phosphoric
acid
Rinse thoroughly
Re-prep if necessary after set
Place Glass Ionomer base
Closed Sandwich Technique
Wait 2:30
Apply Seventh Generation Bonding
Agent
Zhang Y, Burrow MF, Palamara JEA, Thomas CDL. Bonding to Glass Ionomer Cements using Resin-based Adhesives. Op Dent 2011;36:618-625.
Closed Sandwich Technique
Finish and polish
Place Composite & Cure
(Sonic Fill)
19
Long term interim restoration
Glass Ionomer RestorationsGlass Ionomer Restorations
Long term interim restoration
Glass Ionomer RestorationsGlass Ionomer Restorations
Long term interim restoration
Glass Ionomer RestorationsGlass Ionomer Restorations
Long term interim restoration
Glass Ionomer RestorationsGlass Ionomer Restorations
But… How long do they last?
Zanata RL, Fagundes TC, Freitas MC, Lauris JR, Navarro MF. Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(2):265-71
Placement 2 years 10 years
92.7% success
65.2% success
Survival Rate
Single Surface Restorations*(*based on placement of older GI formulations)
But… How long do they last?
Zanata RL, Fagundes TC, Freitas MC, Lauris JR, Navarro MF. Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(2):265-71
Placement 2 years 10 years
86.8% success
30.6% success
Survival Rate
Multiple Surface Restorations*
(n=62)
(*based on placement of older GI formulations)
20
But… How long do they last?
Five Year Restorations
Long term interim restoration
How long do they last?• 8-12 years- single surface
• 5-8 years- multiple surface
• The larger the restoration, the shorter its lifetime
Long term interim restoration
Then what?• Re-prepare surface and place posterior
composite restoration
• Prepare tooth for a crown
Equia
Glass Ionomer/Filled Resin Sealant
Easy, Quick, Universal…
Designed as a system that included surface sealant
Becomes stronger in time
Surface Sealant
• Fills in microcracks and porosity
• Provides a high gloss, smooth surface
• Increase wear resistance and allows material to mature
•Light Cured-Do not etch before applying
•Sealant retains moisture w/in restoration allowing better maturation and hardness before surface is exposed to forces
Surface Sealant
21
Restoration w large crack Restoration w large crack
Dentist-Multiple Radiographic Caries Before and After
Equia Forte
Posterior Glass Ionomer
Equia Forte
Posterior Glass Ionomer
Stronger Glass Ionomer
For use in posterior teeth
Increased compressive strength (219 MPa)
Increased flexural strength
Greater wear resistance
Increased acid resistance
High fluoride release maintained
Stronger surface sealant
Better designed for Class II posterior restorations
22
Equia Forte
Posterior Glass Ionomer
RIVA Self Cure HV
Sudden Onset Caries
Posterior Glass Ionomer
Sudden Onset Caries
Posterior Glass Ionomer
Posterior GI Restorations
Posterior Glass Ionomer
•Acid/base and polymerization reaction
•Ionic and micromechanical bonding
•Dual-curing-faster
•Lower fluoride release
•More esthetic & translucent
Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers
•Liner or Base
•Class V Restorations
•Restoration Under Crown
•Temporary prior to crown
•Sandwich technique
•Cements
•Bonding Agent
Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Uses
23
Fuji Lining LC
Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Liner
Vitrabond
Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Base
Capsule
Fuji II LC RIVA LC
RMGI Liner
No dentin conditionerneeded due to self-etch
primer component
RMGI BaseReprepare
Dentin conditionerpreferred to achieve optional dentin bond
Quick Temporary prior to Crown Temporary placed 5 years ago
24
Sandwich Technique
Resin-modified Bonding Agent–Triturated
–Reduces polymerization shrinkage
stress
–Novel concept
Riva Bond LC
Co-Cure Sandwich Technique*
Acid etch enamel
Condition dentin w PCA -wash
*recommended by Dr Graeme Milicich
Co-Cure Sandwich Technique
Wash thoroughly
Mix GIPlace Glass Ionomer
Spread w/ instrument
Co-Cure Sandwich Technique
Use wet brush to spread out-up sides
Puncture seal and dip brush into RMGI
Co-Cure Sandwich Technique
Light Cure
25
Co-Cure Sandwich Technique
Compress-push against margins
Insert Sonic-Fill tipExpress composite
Co-Cure Sandwich Technique
Adjust occlusionPlace anatomyLight Cure Finish and Polish
Class I Composite Class I Composite CoCo--Cure Sandwich Cure Sandwich
TechniqueTechnique
Cut a large deep round divot into Class I Tooth PrepCut a large deep round divot into Class I Tooth Prep
Mix Glass Ionomer and RIVA bondMix Glass Ionomer and RIVA bond
Place GI into divot and spread outPlace GI into divot and spread out
Place brush into RIVA Bond capsulePlace brush into RIVA Bond capsule
Paint over GI and spread outPaint over GI and spread out
Light CureLight Cure
Place Composite and Light CurePlace Composite and Light Cure
•Exposed to occlusion
•Able to control moisture
•Not acid etching
•No shrinkage stress
•Highest fluoride release
•Out of occlusion
•Need quickness
•Need to acid etch
•Need to bond
•↑translucence/esthetic
Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
Glass Ionomer
Glass IonomersThe “missing link” of esthetic
restorative materials
••Make initial access opening w small burMake initial access opening w small bur
••Use slow speed to remove decayUse slow speed to remove decay
••Use high speed to refine preparationUse high speed to refine preparation
••Smooth margins with a football diamond.Smooth margins with a football diamond.
Clinical Class I Restoration
••Completed PreparationsCompleted Preparations
26
Bur Block Setup
#1 rd #4 rd Jazz Flame Jazz Cup Gw-256-021 56-018 230C 201.3VF 379-023 849-011(Pirhana)
56 169L 330 7901 7404 7406
Er:YAG Laser
Lite-Touch
••Often use no anesthesiaOften use no anesthesia
••Restoration blends well into toothRestoration blends well into tooth
Er:YAG Laser
Lite-Touch
••Laser inside handpieceLaser inside handpiece
••More efficient and easier to useMore efficient and easier to use
••Less ExpensiveLess Expensive
Er:YAG Laser
••Use for limited bone reUse for limited bone re--sculptingsculpting
••Biological WidthBiological Width
Ivoclar P-1
••Place glass ionomer base/linerPlace glass ionomer base/liner
••Etch enamel then dentin, wash and dryEtch enamel then dentin, wash and dry
••Place & scrub multiple coats bonding Place & scrub multiple coats bonding agent, wait, evaporate solvent and cureagent, wait, evaporate solvent and cure
••Place composite and adapt to sidesPlace composite and adapt to sides
•If large use incremental layers
•Cure thoroughly
Posterior Finishing Burs
Occlusal Anatomy OcclusalSecondary Anatomy
Buccal/ lingual gingival-IP
12 fluted carbide burs
ProcedureProcedure Trim and shape composite
Adjust occlusion
Blend margin between tooth and composite
Define secondary anatomy
Restore occlusal fissures
Restore buccal/ lingual contour
Reduce and smooth composite surface
Interproximal shaping at gingiva and above contact
Popular InstrumentsPopular Instruments Football or egg-shaped
7406
H379
15106-5
Flame-shape
H-274
5379-5
Needle shape
Safe-end SE6
7901
15121-5
27
Ivoclar
Astropol
SS White
Jazz
Caulk Enhance/POGO
••Blend margins with finishing carbidesBlend margins with finishing carbides
••Adjust occlusionAdjust occlusion
••Finish and polishFinish and polish
Etch, wash/dry and apply surface sealantEtch, wash/dry and apply surface sealant
OOPS!
Endodontic Root Canal Endodontic Root Canal Therapy?Therapy?
Asymptomatic
Single small exposure
Able to achieve hemostasis
Perhaps not IF:
Traditional Pulpal ProtectionIndirect Pulp Capping
Best not to expose pulp• Asymptomatic• Sound 2mm around margins• Stop when next scoop will expose pulp• Place GI or Ca(OH)2
Traditional Pulpal ProtectionIndirect/Direct Pulp Capping
What are we trying to accomplish?
• Mechanical Sealing of the Pulp• Stimulate hydroxyapatite formation• Dentin bridge formation
28
Traditional Pulpal ProtectionIndirect/Direct Pulp Capping
How does this happen?
• Material sets hard and adheres to dentin• Alkaline pH• Release of Ca++ ions Ca+2
OH-
H2O
Ca+2
OH-
Traditional Pulpal ProtectionIndirect/Direct Pulp Capping
Ca(OH)2 Paste• DyCal– Dentsply/Caulk (paste/paste)
• Multi-Cal– Pulpdent (non-setting)
Ca(OH)2 in VLC resin• Prisma VLC DyCal (light cured)
• Life– Kerr (light cured)
Unproven Pulpal ProtectionIndirect/Direct Pulp Capping
Resin Dentin Bonding?• Dentin Bonding Agent-Composite
“Contact with acid and pulp tissue started the bleeding process thus damaging the bonding technique resulting in no cellular differentiation and new dentin formation. The use of dentin bonding agents should be avoided for vital pulp therapy.”
Silva GA, Lanza LD, Lopes-Junior N, MoreiraA, Alves JB. Direct pulp capping with a dentin bonding system in human teeth: a clinical and histological evaluation. Oper dent. 2006;31:291-307.
Unproven Pulpal ProtectionIndirect/Direct Pulp Capping
Glass Ionomer/RMGI?
“Poly Acrylic Acid (PAA) inhibits apatite formation in the body environment. PAA released from the glass-ionomer cements inhibits the apatite formation on tooth surfaces. It might be considered difficult to obtain bioactive glass-ionomer cements”
Kawashita M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Effect of polyacrylic acid on the apatite formation of a bioactive ceramic in a simulated body fluid: fundamental examination of the possibility of obtaining bioactive glass-ionomer cements for orthopaedic use. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3191-6.
Improved Pulpal ProtectionIndirect/Direct Pulp Capping
Ca(OH)2 Paste• Ultra-Blend Plus– Ultradent
29
Pulpal Protection – Indirect/DirectPulp Capping
MTA (Mineral Trioxide Aggregate)
• ProRoot-Dentsply• Biodentine-Septodont• Thera-Cal LC-Bisco
Bismuth oxide Bi2O3
Gypsum CaSO4 · 2 H2O
Tetracalcium aluminoferrite (CaO)4.Al2O3.Fe2O3
Tricalcium aluminate (CaO)3.Al2O3
Dicalcium silicate (CaO)2.SiO2
Tricalcium silicate (CaO)3.SiO2
Biodentine
Latest Pulpal ProtectionIndirect/Direct Pulp Capping
Resin Modified Calcium Silicate• Theracal
Latest Pulpal ProtectionIndirect/Direct Pulp Capping
Light cured apatite forming MTA in a unique hydrophilic resin (polyethylene glycol methacrylate) that releases calcium
30
Hilton TJ. Keys to Clinical Success with Pulp Capping: A Review of the Literature. Op Dent 2009;34:615-625.
How many of you have How many of you have problems with Mandibular Nerve problems with Mandibular Nerve
Blocks?Blocks?
Really, Final
Answer?
Trustworthy, loyal helpful, friendly, courteous, kind
obedient..
YES NO….?
How many of you have How many of you have problems with Mandibular Nerve problems with Mandibular Nerve
Blocks?Blocks?
30-Minute Time Course for Pulpal Analgesia - Lidocaine IANBsData from 30 PRP Studies (1991 - 2008), n = 1162 Subjects, Lidocaine/Epi IANB
How many of you have How many of you have problems with Mandibular Nerve problems with Mandibular Nerve
Blocks?Blocks?
Mean 30-Minute Time Course for Pulpal Analgesia - Lidocaine IANBsData from 30 PRP Studies (1991 - 2008), n = 1162 Subjects, Lidocaine/Epi IANB
10 minutes (60%)
How many of you have How many of you have problems with Mandibular Nerve problems with Mandibular Nerve
Blocks?Blocks?
30-Minute Time Course for Pulpal Analgesia - Articaine IANBsData from 5 PRP Studies - 222 Subjects (1990 - 2008)
How many of you have How many of you have problems with Mandibular Nerve problems with Mandibular Nerve
Blocks?Blocks?
Mean 30-Minute Time Course for Pulpal Analgesia - Articaine IANBsData from 5 PRP Studies - 222 Subjects (1990 - 2008)
10 minutes (60%)
31
Pharmacology of Local Pharmacology of Local AnestheticsAnesthetics
• Local Anesthetics is an acidic solution with a pH of ~ 3.9• It is an Inactive form to extend shelf life• Body must raise pH of the local anesthetic to ~ 7.4 for it to be
active• Takes up to 6-15 minutes • Sodium Bicarbonate neutralizes the anesthetic solution• Buffered anesthetic brings pH level close to physiologic pH
prior to injection
Pharmacology of Local Pharmacology of Local AnestheticsAnesthetics
• Buffered anesthetic brings pH level close to physiologic pH prior to injection
• Very quick onset (2-3 minutes)-able to determine proper injection site soon
• More comfortable injection with less burning• More profound anesthesia—6,000 times more active
anesthetic at time of injection• CO2 microbubbles created during mixing improves ability of
anesthetic to cross nerve membrane
Buffered and nonBuffered and non--buffered buffered anestheticanesthetic--time vs. efficacy of time vs. efficacy of
IANBIANB
Mean 30-Minute Time Course for Pulpal Analgesia – Lidocaine, Articaine , Buffered Lidocaine IANBsData from published and company Studies
2 minute Buffered as effective 2 minute Buffered as effective as 10 minute nonas 10 minute non--buffered buffered anestheticanesthetic--efficacy of IANBefficacy of IANB
Mean 30-Minute Time Course for Pulpal Analgesia – Lidocaine, Articaine , Buffered Lidocaine IANBsData from published and company Studies
67%
8 minute Buffered anesthetic 8 minute Buffered anesthetic gives 90+% efficacy of IANBgives 90+% efficacy of IANB
Mean 30-Minute Time Course for Pulpal Analgesia – Lidocaine, Articaine , Buffered Lidocaine IANBsData from published and company Studies
67%Cartridge Connector Mixing PenBicarbonate Solution
Onset by OnpharmaOnset by Onpharma
32
AnutraAnutra
Advantages– Increased onset of
analgesia-feedback
– Increased efficacy of analgesia
– More comfortable injection
Challenges– New routine
– Cost
Buffered AnesthesiaBuffered Anesthesia
Anutra– $500/month
– Commitment to system
– Used on every patient
– Once setup easy to use and saves time
Onset– $50/10 injections
– Less change to routine
– Used only on difficult injections
Buffered AnesthesiaBuffered Anesthesia
1‐844‐268‐8721www.AnutraMedical.com
If you are interested…
Onset Anutra
1‐877‐336‐6738www.onpharma.com
GC products
Kerr products
Venus Pearl
New Resin TechnologyNew Resin TechnologyNon Non bisbis--GMA CompositesGMA Composites Bulk Fill CompositesBulk Fill Composites
Allow many posterior restorations to be built up in 1 segment
Descriptions– “Stick the stuff in the hole and cure”– Evolutionary– Monolithic
Physical Advantages– Deeper depth of cure– Less Polymerization Shrinkage– Less Polymerization Shrinkage Stress– Reduced likelihood of air voids between layers
33
Bulk Fill CompositesBulk Fill Composites
Modes of Action– Improved initiators– Greater translucency allows better light transmission– Delayed gel state formation– Increased elasticity
Materials– Flowable– Conventional
Advantages– Quicker, easier– Less chance of enamel and cusp fractures– Increased likelihood of adequate resin polymerization
Bulk Fill Flowable CompositesBulk Fill Flowable CompositesLow Shrinkage StressStress
•Surefill SDR
• Voco Xtra
•Beautifil Bulk Flowable
•Venus Bulk Fill
Surefill SDRSurefill SDR
•Reduced polymerization shrinkage stress
• Bulk fill to 4mm
•Increased sensitivity to light
Great placement with metal tips
•Self-leveling
•A1, A2, A3 Universal shades
Roggendorf MJ1, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent. 2011;39:643-647.
Polymerization Shrinkage Polymerization Shrinkage StressStress(MPa)(MPa)
Bulk Fill Posterior CompositesBulk Fill Posterior CompositesLow Shrinkage StressStress
• Voco Xtra Fill
•Beautifill Bulk Flow
•Aura Bulk Fill
•Tetric Evo-Ceram Bulk Fill
•Sonic Fill
Sonic Energy Assisted Light Sonic Energy Assisted Light PolymerizationPolymerization
Sonic FillSonic Fill
34
Improved flowability of composites
Improved marginal adaptation
5mm depth of cure
Increased sculptability and ease in shaping anatomy
Composite designed specifically for use
ADVANTAGESADVANTAGESSonic Energy Assisted Light Sonic Energy Assisted Light
PolymerizationPolymerization
Sonic Energy Assisted Light Sonic Energy Assisted Light PolymerizationPolymerization
Sonic FillSonic Fill
Sonic Energy Assisted Light Sonic Energy Assisted Light PolymerizationPolymerization
Sonic FillSonic Fill
Interproximal Contacts
Composite Direct Placement Composite Direct Placement ChallengesChallenges
Christensen JJ. Duplicating the form and function of posterior teeth with Class II resin-based composite. Gen Dent. 2012;60:104-108.
Microband Focu-tip Trimax
Interproximal ContactsInterproximal ContactsOriginal Attempted SolutionsOriginal Attempted Solutions
Not enough pressure to separate teeth
Fly off
Wedge in the way
Interproximal ContactsInterproximal ContactsSectional Matrix ChallengesSectional Matrix Challenges
35
TofflemireTofflemire vs. Sectional vs. Sectional MatricesMatrices
Tofflemire System
Thin contact at the marginal ridge
Non‐anatomical Foodtrapbelowcontact
Increasedlikelihoodof:fracture,recurrentcariesandperiodontaldisease.
SectionalMatrices
Broad contacts at the proper height of contour
Anatomicallyshapedcontacts
TightContactsPropercontactsthatflossproperlyandpromotegingivalhealth
Interproximal ContactInterproximal Contact
RetainersRetainers
TrioDent/Palodent
Universal V3 Ring Narrow V3 Ring
Interproximal ContactInterproximal Contact
Also Available as:Also Available as:
Palodent Plus
Universal Ring Narrow Ring
Interproximal ContactInterproximal Contact
BandsBands
TrioDent/Palodent Plus
Bendable tab
Side holes for easy removal
Holes allow grip with Pin-Tweezers
Marginal Ridge Contour
Pin Tweezers
Interproximal ContactInterproximal Contact
BandsBands
TrioDent/Palodent Plus
Bicuspid
Molar
Sub-gingival Molar
36
Interproximal ContactInterproximal Contact
Anatomical WedgesAnatomical Wedges
Wave Wedges
Pin Tweezers
TrioDent/Palodent Plus
Challenge:
Adjacent Class II Composite Restorations
Prepare enamel margins
Place contoured
band, wedge & V-Ring
Selective etching
Wash thoroughly
Apply bonding agent
Fill box 2/3’s full
Compress w 1P
Cure
Finish buildup
Cure
Sonicfill
Remove wedge peel band back
Cure IP
Remove band & cure
ContacEZ
Re-contour diamond/finishing
carbides
Finishing strips
Place V-Ring on adjacent tooth
Burnish desired contact area
Selective etching
Place Universal bonding agent
Light Cure
37
Peel back band
Cure from both sides at
gingiva
Place Composite as before
Light Cure Finish and polish
Adjust occlusion
Adjacent Class II Preparations Band and Retainer on Mesial of Adjacent Interproximal Tooth
Push band in using placement instrument
Add first increment-push B & L
38
Add second increment to top Add final increment-push against margins
Form occlusal anatomy and light cure
Disassemble retainer and matrix band-light curing IP each step
Remove Interproximal excess-shape contact area w dia/carbide
Blend and shape IP margins
39
Shape Occlusal with Egg Shaped Finishing Carbide-Blend margins
Adjust occlusion (if no dam placed) -shape anatomy w 245 bur
Finish and polish Place both bands and wedges
First place mesial retainer Place distal retainer
40
Burnish contacts (Bond in mouth) add f2 increments to mesial-adapt well
Repeat process on distal Fill occlusal, shape and light cure
Remove retainer-light cure IP Remove wedge-light cure IP
41
Remove band-light cure IP Shape Occlusal with Egg Shaped Finishing Carbide-Blend margins
Blend and shape IP with Pointed finishing carbide
Shape along gingiva w pointed finishing carbide
Shape Occlusal IP for EZ flossing Adjust occlusion-shape anatomy w 245 bur
42
Polish with cups(in mouth use IP finishing strips
Polish with points
Post-Cure (Optional etch & surface sealant)
Finished Restorations
Thank You!
www.drwardhandouts.com