CasualtyInformation_1995_06.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 CasualtyInformation_1995_06.pdf

    1/1

    No. 6/95 Edited by DSO-245

    SHIP TYPE:General Cargo SIZE(GRT):4000 BUILT YEAR:1991

    Broken tailshaft

    Course of eventsThe vessel in question was under way to Taiwan loaded with containers when problems arose with the controllable pitch propeller. The vessel wasdisabled and tug assistance had to be called. The voyage continued under tow to the discharge port where survey ascertained that the tailshaft wasbroken. After discharging the cargo the vessel was dry-docked.

    Extent of damageOn withdrawing the tailshaft it was discovered that the shaft had broken between the forward and aft stern tube bearings (see diagram). The shaft ran inwater-lubricated rubber bearings and was not fitted with a continuous liner. Between the forward and aft bronze liners, the shaft was covered by a GRP(Glass Reinforced Polyester) lining. When the remaining pieces of GRP were removed, it was found that the shaft was heavily corroded in the area ofthe fracture. The aft rubber bearing was missing and the forward one completely destroyed.

    Probable causeThe GRP shaft lining had probably failed and allowed water to reach the steel surface beneath the cover. With corrosion arising from the penetration ofwater, the fatigue life of the steel was reduced and lead to a fatigue failure of the tailshaft. The incident probably began as a torsional corrosion fatiguecracking and culminated in a total torsional rupture of the shaft. Apparently the GRP lining protection between the two liners had not been fittedcorrectly.

    Lessons to be learnedExperience has shown that it is very difficult to obtain a completely watertight connection between a bronze liner and the protective coating if eitherGRP or rubber is used. Furthermore, if the coating is damaged during mounting or dismantling of the shaft, water may enter between the coating andthe steel and give rise to corrosion, even if the damage appears negligible. Ordinary inspection will not reveal any corrosion of the steel shaft. Thecoating must be removed completely, and subsequent refitting must include complete recoating if future shaft failure is to be avoided.

    Conclusion

    Water-lubricated stern tube arrangements involving shafts without continuous liners are vulnerable to damage as described above and should thereforebe avoided.

    Casualty Informationis published by Det Norske Veritas, ClassificationSupport.

    Det Norske VeritasNO-1322 Hvik, NorwayTel: +47 67 57 99 00Fax: +47 67 57 99 11

    The purpose of Casualty Informationis to provide the maritime industry with'lessons to be learned' from incidents of ship damage and more serious

    accidents. In this way, Det Norske Veritas AS hopes to contribute to the

    prevention of similar occurrences in the future. The information included is notnecessarily restricted to cover ships classed with DNV and is presented,without obligation, for information purposes only.

    Queries may be directed toDet Norske Veritas, Classification Support, NO-1322 Hvik, Norway.Fax: +47 67 57 99 11, e-mail: [email protected]

    Det Norske Veritas AS. This publication may be reproduced freely oncondition that Det Norske Veritas AS (DNV) is always stated as the source.

    DNV accepts no responsibility for any errors or misinterpretations.

    www.dnv.com/maritime