Upload
lok
View
36
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
CASE OF THE MONTH. Submitted by: Dr. Cecil White Jr. HISTORY. 32 year-old female; Medical history within normal limits. OMFS performed LeFort I osteotomy in maxilla (w/BSSO in mandible). The mesial root of #6 was cut, and developed a persistent radiolucent area; no pain involved. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
CASE OF THE MONTH
Submitted by: Dr. Cecil White Jr.
HISTORY• 32 year-old female; Medical history within normal
limits.• OMFS performed LeFort I osteotomy in maxilla
(w/BSSO in mandible). • The mesial root of #6 was cut, and developed a
persistent radiolucent area; no pain involved.• #6 developed draining fistula w/no response to
electric pulp tester. Subsequent pain upon mastication, 6 months later, prompted non-surgical endo to #6.
• Referral to periodontist, 54 months following original orthognathic surgery.
CLINICAL EXAM
• 10 mm probing depth (PD) at mesial of #6, and 7 mm PD at distal of #7.
• Miller’s Class I mobility of #6 and #7.• #6 displayed purulence and bleeding upon
probing.• Radiographs displayed radiolucent area at
mesial of #6, with partial loss of root structure in apical 1/3rd of tooth.
TREATMENT PLAN
• Phase I:– Scaling/root planing (SRP) of area performed.– Reevaluation at 8 weeks following SRP revealed
persistent problem, with no improvement in probing depth/clinical attachment levels.
• Phase II:– Open flap debridement to assess lesion/defect
Pre-operative presentation- Facial surface
Pre-operative presentation- Palatal surface
Pre-operative radiograph
INTRA-OPERATIVE FINDINGS
• Combination 1- and 2-wall intrabony defect, extending from the mesial surface, to the distopalatal line angle of #6.
• Vertical dimension of the defect ranged from 4-6 mm.
• A 5 mm x 2 mm segment of gutta-percha was exposed, starting 4 mm apical to the CEJ.
POTENTIAL TREATMENT OPTIONS• Application of Enamel Matrix Derivative (EMD)
to defect and root surface of #6, closure.• Extract tooth #6, immediate implant to #6, bone
graft/barrier, closure.• Glass ionomer cement to root surface defect, root
surface conditioning with tetracycline (TCN), bone graft/TCN/barrier, closure.
• Extract teeth #6 and #7, bone graft/barrier, closure; subsequent implant placement.
• Extract #6, bone graft/barrier; subsequent placement of Fixed Bridge (#4 - #8).
CHOSEN TREATMENT OPTION
Glass ionomer cement to root surface defect, root surface
conditioning with tetracycline (TCN), bone graft/TCN/barrier,
closure.
DFDBA graft/tetracycline combination placed into defect, following root surface conditioning with tetracycline and glass ionomer cement repair of root surface defect.
Placement of expanded-polytetraethylene(e-PTFE) barrier
Primary closure
6 weeks following barrier placement - Facial
6 weeks following barrier placement - Palatal
Barrier removal at 6 weeks, with “regenerative” soft tissue present
Re-entry of #6 area at 24 months following original open flap/root repair/bone graft procedure (i.e. “original” surgery)
Restoration at 30 months following “original” surgery/6 months following “re-entry” procedure - Facial
Restoration at 30 months following “original” surgery/6 months following “re-entry” procedure - Palatal
Post-operative radiograph at 24 months post-operative
PRE-SURGERY POST-SURGERY/RESTORATIVE
PRE-SURGERY 24 MONTH POST-SURGERY
SUMMARY• PROBLEM
– Chronic periodontal lesion, with root surface defect, caused by errant section of root surface during orthognathic surgery procedure.
• TREATMENT – Situation was treated with open flap debridement,
repair of root surface defect with glass ionomer cement, root surface conditioning with tetracycline, combination DFDBA/tetracycline (4:1 ratio), and placement of e-PTFE barrier.
• OUTCOME– 1 to 3 mm probing depths, no mobility, and no
bleeding on probing to sites #6 and #7.