Upload
vishal-lathwal
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
1/31
4/28/12
Presented By:Group 1 (Sec. B)
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
2/31
4/28/12
Introduction
Corporate Branding Strategy
386 could not be trademarked
Develop a trademark name Launch a corporate branding
campaign
2006: Retooled and launched IntelLeap Ahead campaign
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
3/31
4/28/12
Company Background
Founded in 1968 by Robert Noyceand Gordan Moore
1978, 16-bit 8086 Processor 1979, 16-bit 8088 Processor
Competition with Motorola 68000
1980:- IBMs selection
1988:- Intel 386 SX
April 1989:- 486 Processor
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
4/31
4/28/12
Microprocessor Industry inthe early 1990s
1986, only supplier of 386 and 486technology
0ct. 1990, AMD386 1991, Chips and Technology and
NextGen microsystems
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
5/31
4/28/12
Intels Branding Issues
Late 1980s : Shift from PC industryto mass market, non technicalbusiness and home PC
Strategy shift
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
6/31
4/28/12
Create Brand awareness and brandpreference
How to differentiate its products
June 1989: Mimicked Grafatti byspray painting over 286 and inserting386 SX
1991: Sold 8 million units
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
7/31
4/28/12
Evolution of Intels BrandingStrategy
March 1991: lost 386 trademarkcase
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
8/31
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
9/31
4/28/12
Intel inside
The Computer Inside campaign Intel In It
Finally to Intel Inside
Enlisting OEM Support
Coop Advertising Program Rebates between 30 to 40 percent of
the cost of print add up to a
maximum of 3% of companys Intel
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
10/31
4/28/12
Launching the Intel InsideProgram
1991:- $125 million in the next 18months
240 OEM customers agreed To create a brand image for the
products that fall under the Intel
Inside umbrella Aimed at:- Microchip maker to
quality standard bearer
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
11/31
4/28/12
Relationship with OEMs IBM was the first major OEM to use Intel Inside Logo, in April 1991.
Followed by Zenith Data Systems, Everex Systems, NCR Corp, DellComputers and AST Research but by then first tier companies like Compaq
and IBM left using the Intel Inside Logo.
Intels AD Campaign
The first Intel Inside ad was a print ad called measles. The objective was to get the new logo in front of consumers and get them
familiar with the Intel name.
In November 1991, Intel launched its first T.V. ad named Room for futureusing special effects to take the viewer inside the computer.
Branding and Naming P5 As the numbers were not trade-markable, Intel decided to create a new
brand that would
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
12/31
4/28/12
The Pentium Name
Announced October 20, 1992
Pentium Name chosen
Pent Fifth generation processor ium Elemental component
Great emphasis on PR and media
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
13/31
4/28/12
Product Announcement
Employed extensively detailed ads
Elite positioning
For all but the most demanding users Went back to the roots
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
14/31
4/28/12
Success
$500 million invested in advertising
Ingredient branding was the focus
Intel Inside
Competition ignored and rejected thestrategy
Won several awards:
Marcom award
Grand marquis excellence award
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
15/31
4/28/12
Success (Contd.)
Intel conducted market research globally
Users perceived Intel as tech leader vs.AMD and Cyrix
Brand recognition increased highly afterthe campaign
Intel and Intel Inside confusing for non-
technical users Foreign languages also created a little
confusion
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
16/31
4/28/12
The Hit
Initial sales only 10% of revenue
Price cuts showed rapid surge in sales
In 1992, Intel had 90% of the market share
In 1994, the revenues sored 24% from theprevious year
1997 Pentium II launched
Used Super Bowl and Bunny People Ad
$100 million spent on campaign
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
17/31
4/28/12
Renewed Competition
1998- HP and Compaq chose cheaper AMDand Cyrix
Intel ignored the low-end market
By 97 summer, AMD and Cyrix gained 20%of low end market
Intel dropped below 30%
Intel release low-end Celeron
The slow Celeron resulted in drop ofmarket share from 68 to 56%
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
18/31
4/28/12
Renewed Competition(Contd.)
1999 Release of Pentium III
Positioned as tool to enhance home PCuser`s Internet experience
Double advertising budget in 1998 $300million
More PC centered campaign
Featured trio Blue Man Group
Reinforced number III
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
19/31
4/28/12
AMD in market place
AMD launched its Opteron chip against IntelsXeon in 2003
It was favored by HP, Sun microsystems and IBMas it consumed lesser electricity and generatedlesser heat
AMD also launched Turion chip against Centrino
It managed to beat Intel in many areas
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
20/31
4/28/12
New Opportunities
Expansion in china as it was the 3rd largest marketfor chips
Apple started using Intel
Intel focused on digital household
Leap Ahead:
Changed its brand identity and logo after 37 years Intel was now Leap Ahead
Focused on boosting wireless computing
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
21/31
Q 1 Wh t th t th
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
22/31
4/28/12
Q.1 What were the strengthsand weaknesses of Intel Insidecampaign? Weakness
Conflict with 1st tier OEMs
Product is under advertised
Strengths
Clear conversion Build brand equity and pull preference
Co-op support from OEMs
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
23/31
4/28/12
Q.2. Evaluate Intels continued the use of thePentium family of processors. Did Intel makethe right decision by extending the namethrough the Pentium processor? Flaws of the previous processor model names
Hence it took the right decision by extending the namethrough the Pentium processor
This helped the company:1. Differentiate its products from its competitors like AMD
2. Maintain its brand equity and avoiding brand dilution
3. Trademark its products to avoid copying
4. The word Pentium connected with the product andthis name became synonymous with processors
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
24/31
Click to edit Master subtitle style
4/28/12
Q. 3 Suppose you were the Chief Marketing Officer forAMD. How would you propose the company position itselfto better compete with Intel? Would you propose that
AMD institute an Inside like ad campaign?
AMD management does not believe in Inside campaigns.Besides, it is not recommended to imitate Intel to avoid a followerimage.
AMD is half the size of Intel, there was no need of similarmarketing strategy
AMD should focus on its core competencies, excel in thecommodity-like memory business, and try to be ahead in cutting-edge technology, support its brands Athlon 64 and Opteron and buila better experience and better lifestyle by bridging the digital gap
between poor and rich
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
25/31
4/28/12
AMD should concentrate on Flash memory- mobile technology
They have a better, less expensive product, both consumer andbusiness.
strategy Is
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
26/31
4/28/12
strategy. Ishaving a good/better/best product line( Celeron, Pentium, Xeon) the bestpositioning for Intel? Should itdiscontinue a line(s) and focus onother(s)?? Yes, it was a good segmentation strategy by
Intel
v Having a product line like Celeron, Pentium,Xeon, it will cover whole market from lowend to high end chip. So it was a good
positioning for Intelv No need to discontinue any line but try to
focus on speed and product performance
the companys executives make the right decision
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
27/31
4/28/12
the company s executives make the right decisionin launching an entirely new brand identity? Did itmake the right decision in changing a 37 year oldIntel logo and dropping the Intel inside campaignfor Leap Ahead? What other marketing strategiesmight the company employ? Yes, a company like Intel must progress and
develop new applications for its products becausethe customer base is comfortable with technologyand have the buying power.
Not wasted the 37 year impression that they hadmade on the consumers consciousness, they havekept the essential logo and the Intel name.
Easy to use products that enhances life and theliveability of a home is the best way to go.
By using a strategy of combining products incomputer systems, Intel can sell more of its non-processor products by including them with IntelProcessors
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
28/31
4/28/12
Intel has stated that Viiv-based PCs willfeature dual-core processing, remote controloperation, gigabit Ethernet controllers andwireless network cards. Viiv-based PCs will
also act as a personal video recorder with theaddition of a TV tuner card.
It will also feature a Quick Resume
Technology which will allow users to turn offand on the computer in a manner of seconds.
This new campaign has established anemotional connection with the customers. It
also credited the engineers behind Intel's
products such as digital cameras in 2000 only
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
29/31
4/28/12
products such as digital cameras in 2000, onlyto withdraw after receiving complains fromOEM`s such as Dell. Does Intel face a similarissue with its move into the digital home?
Does this move too far outside its corecompetency of producing micro-processors? Shortcomings:
Major competition
Diluted focus Lack of expertise
Digital Home: Employs DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance)
organization
Co-operation between several brands (245)
Focus on combining ideas and providing a unique
products such as digital cameras in 2000 only
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
30/31
4/28/12
Intel`s competency:
Digital home integrates software and hardware
Exploits Intel`s expertise of micro-processors
Integrates it with expertise from different partners
Enhances Intel`s Intel Inside image
Expands range of functionality keeping in mind theneed of the times
Moves outside the core competency
products such as digital cameras in 2000, onlyto withdraw after receiving complains fromOEM`s such as Dell. Does Intel face a similarissue with its move into the digital home?
Does this move too far outside its corecompetency of producing micro-processors?
8/3/2019 Case Analysis Intel Sec a Group2
31/31
4/28/12
Thank
YouMembers:Aadil Ahmed (01)Abhijeet Chowdhary (03)
Abhishek Sharma (05)Akshay Gopal (07)Ankur Dave (10)Arushi Goswami (18)