Canola variety guide for Western Australia 2016...Canola variety guide for WA 2016 4 NVT data analysis The first stage of NVT data analysis is to produce core statistics for individual

Bulletin 4869Second editionOctober 2015ISSN No. 183 7366

• Triazine Tolerant (TT)• Triazine Tolerant with Roundup Ready® (TT+RR)• Roundup Ready® (RR) and • Clearfield(CL)canolavarieties

Department ofAgriculture and Food

Supporting your success

Canolavarietyguidefor Western Australia 2016

Canola variety guide for WA 2016

nvtonline.com.au agric.wa.gov.au2

By Jackie Bucat, Mark Seymour, Bob French, Raj Malik, Sally Sprigg, Martin Harries and Vanessa Stewart

AcknowledgementsThis publication and the Tactical Break Crop Agronomy Project are co-funded by Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia (DAFWA) and the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC).

The data in this publication was provided by;

• GRDC National Variety Testing (NVT)

• GRDC Fact Sheet 2015 Spring Blackleg Management Guide

• CBH Group

Thanks to Neale Sutton at ACAS Limited for assistance with data.

ContentsCurrent canola varieties in Western Australia (2014) 3

The National Variety Trial scheme 3

NVT data analysis 4

Early and Mid maturity trial series 4

Oil data 4

Blackleg data 4

Reading the production value charts 5

Triazine Tolerant and (TT+RR) varieties 5

Roundup Ready® varieties 6

Clearfield canola varieties 10

WA canola licensees 12

List of trial sites and variety production values 12


nvtonline.com.au agric.wa.gov.au nvtonline.com.au agric.wa.gov.au 3

Current canola varieties in Western Australia (2014)Triazine Tolerant varieties accounted for the vast majority of canola grown in Western Australia (WA) (79%) in 2014, even though there was a slight decline in favour of Roundup Ready® varieties.

Table 1 Canola herbicide systems in WA

Herbicide system 2012 (%) 2013 (%) 2014 (%)

Triazine Tolerant (TT) 87 83 79

Roundup Ready (RR) 8 13 19

Clearfield (CL) 4 3 2

Conventional (CC) 1 1 0

Data courtesy of CBH Group. Data is the percentage area of each herbicide system that was planned to be sown, in each growing season.

Almost all Triazine Tolerant (TT) canola is open pollinated, this was 98% of the TT area in 2014. Conversely, hybrid varieties were 92% of all Roundup Ready® canola. Seventy four percent of the Clearfield area was hybrid varieties in 2014.

Open pollinated, Triazine Tolerant canola varieties remain the most important group for WA growers, they accounted for 78% of the WA canola crop in 2014 (figure 1).

Figure 1 Area sown to open pollinated and hybrid canola in WA

Data courtesy of CBH Group. Data is the open pollinated and hybrid percentage area of each herbicide system, which was planned to be sown in the 2014 growing season.

The four most widely grown canola varieties were Triazine Tolerant and together accounted for fifty seven percent of the canola area in 2014 (figure 2). ATR Stingray was the most popular canola variety in WA during 2014. Its area increased to nearly 28%. Hyola 404RR was the most widely grown Roundup Ready® variety, at 7% of the WA canola area. The most popular Clearfield variety was Pioneer® 45Y86CL, at 0.4%.

Figure 2 Area sown to canola varieties in WA

Data courtesy of CBH Group. Varieties shown are > 1.8% of planned canola crop area in 2014.

The National Variety Trial schemeEach year the NVT scheme coordinates approximately one hundred and seventy canola variety trials, in sixty four locations around Australia. GRDC funds the National Varieties scheme. Trial results are on the NVT website, nvtonline.com.au.

This report presents the results from the WA National variety trials from 2010 to 2014. There were 187 successful canola NVT trials in WA during this period (tables 8-10).

There are approximately 40 trials per year, distributed in more than 20 locations. The WA trials comprise a mix of Triazine Tolerant (TT), Triazine Tolerant with Roundup Ready® (TT+RR), Roundup Ready® (RR) and Clearfield (CL) trials. Conventional canola is no longer included in WA NVT trials.

There are many varieties in each NVT trial, typically comprising current and older varieties, new experimental varieties and some specialty varieties (e.g. Monola). Only the results from current varieties are shown in this report.

Are

a so

wn

(%

)

Hybrid

OP

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

CCCLRRTT

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2013 2014 Area so

wn (%

)

Bonito (2%) 43Y23(RR) (3) Telfer (3) Jackpot TT (3) Sturt TT (3) GT-‐50 (4) Snapper (6) Hyola 404RR (7) Cobbler (7) Gem (9) Crusher TT (13) SKngray (28)

nvtonline.com.au agric.wa.gov.au



NVT data analysisThe first stage of NVT data analysis is to produce core statistics for individual trials. These include the trial mean (or average) yield, predicted yield for each variety in the experiment and a weighting of how valuable or valid the result is. Where multiple herbicide tolerance trials are at one location, they are analysed together to reduce the variability in the results.

The trial mean yield is calculated from the average of all varieties in the trial, (current varieties, older varieties, test lines and specialty lines).

There are three replicates in each trial. The performance of an individual variety in each replicate contributes to its overall predicted yield. The similarity of the variety performance in each replicate contributes to its weighting. The more similar the replicates were, the higher the weighting for that variety in that trial. Conversely, if there were issues with a variable site or variable establishment or if a single replicate was affected by insects, there may be larger differences in the replicates. This would result in a lower weighting, reflecting a lower value of this trial result.

The data for the trial mean yield and the ‘single site predicted yields’ is available from NVT online under the ‘current trial results’ tab.

The second stage of NVT analysis combines the results of all the single site analyses to produce a long term Multi Environment Trial (MET) predicted yield (or long term MET predicted yield). Results of all trials in Australia are combined to generate the ‘long term MET predicted yield’ for each variety in each trial. In addition, a long term MET predicted yield is also generated for varieties that were not actually grown in these trials. This data is particularly valuable for the canola industry, with the rapid cycling of new varieties, meaning that variety yield estimates are not penalised if the variety was not included in high yielding trials.

The second stage analysis also measures the difference between the predicted yield of each variety and the average trial yield. This is the comparative yield or Production Value (PV). Usually, as average trial yields go up, so do the yields of varieties in that trial. To compare varieties, we want to predict which variety increases more than another one.

Measuring the PV allows us to isolate and compare this difference and is the best prediction of variety yield (figures 4-6 and tables 8-10). The long term MET predicted yield is the sum of the trial mean yield and the production value.

Finally, an Agzone average long term MET predicted yield is calculated. This data is available from NVTonline under the ‘Long term results’ tab. In this report, the long term MET average yield is presented as a percentage of the yield of a standard variety (tables 2, 3 and 4).

Early and Mid maturity trial seriesThere are two groups of trials in the NVT, the mid-maturity and early maturity series. Both sets of trials have similar sowing and harvest times and have a similar complement of varieties, although there may be several early maturity varieties in the early series that are not tested in the mid series, or vice versa. The main difference between the series is that the trials are located in areas suited to their maturity, with the majority of early series trials in Agzone 1 and 5, while all mid season trials are in Agzone 2, 3 or 6.

The early season trials from Agzone 1 and 5 are included in the tables and figures, along with the mid season trials of Agzone 2, 3 and 6. Data for the early season trials in Agzone 2, and the few early trials of Agzone 3 and 4 are available from nvtonline.com.au.

Oil dataThe oil data presented is not as reliable as the yield data. A single sample from each variety in each trial is tested for oil, with the simple average presented in the results. As with the yield data, results from many trials are more reliable than results from few trials (tables 2, 5 and 7).

Blackleg dataThe blackleg information is provided from the GRDC Fact Sheet, 2015 Spring blackleg management guide. Please refer to this for further information about the importance of blackleg ratings, resistance groups and management of blackleg. It is available online.

Agronomy of the NVT’sAll NVT trials are treated with Impact-in-Furrow®, at a rate of 400 mL/ha.

The seeding rates are adjusted to target 30 plants/m2 in Agzone 1 and 5 and 50 plants/m2 in Agzone 2, 3 and 6.

http://nvtonline.com.au


nvtonline.com.au agric.wa.gov.au nvtonline.com.au agric.wa.gov.au 5nvtonline.com.au agric.wa.gov.au

Reading the production value chartsProduction value describes the yield performance compared with the average yield.

The scatter charts have the trial mean yield along the horizontal axis and the production value on the vertical axis. The dashed line marks the point where the variety yield is the same as the trial mean yield. The dotted line allows for easier comparison of the data.

Compare the production values of ATR Snapper and Hyola® 559TT, in Fig 4 below;

• Hyola® 559TT generally has an above average production value, while ATR Snapper has a mixed result

• any trends in variety performance are shown. The production value of Hyola® 559TT increases as the trial mean yield increases, while the reverse is true for ATR Snapper

• the stability in variety performance is also shown in the variability of the scatter. Hyola® 559TT has a very stable performance, compared with the variability we see for ATR Snapper.

Trial mean yield (t/ha)

Pro

duct

ion

Valu

es (t

/ha)

−0.4−0.3−0.2−0.1

0.00.10.2

ATR Snapper

1 2 3

Hyola 559TT

Agzone 2 Agzone 3 Agzone 6


Pro

duct

ion

Valu

es (t

/ha)

−0.4−0.3−0.2−0.1

0.00.10.2

ATR Snapper

1 2 3

Hyola 559TT



Pro

duct

ion

Valu

es (t

/ha)

−0.4−0.3−0.2−0.1

0.00.10.2

ATR Snapper

1 2 3

Hyola 559TT



Pro

duct

ion

Valu

es (t

/ha)

−0.4−0.3−0.2−0.1

0.00.10.2

ATR Snapper

1 2 3

Hyola 559TT



Production Values (t/ha)

−0.4−0.3−0.2−0.1

0.00.10.2

ATR Snapper

1 2 3

Hyola 559TT


Variety Licensee Release Year Maturity

2015 Blackleg

rating (bare seed)

2015 Blackleg

rating with Jockey

Blackleg resistance

group

TT O

P

ATR Bonito Nuseed 2013 EM MR A

ATR Cobbler Nuseed 2007 E MS-S** BATR Gem Nuseed 2011 EM MR AATR Mako Nuseed 2015 EM MR R AATR Snapper Nuseed 2010 EM MS-S** CATR Stingray Nuseed 2010 E MR CATR Wahoo Nuseed 2013 ML MR ACrusher TT Pacific Seeds 2010 M MR-MS* AJackpot TT Pacific Seeds 2011 M MR **Sturt (TT) Pioneer® 2012 E MS -Telfer Canola Breeders 2008 VE MS-S** BYetna Convenient Canola Agronomy for Profit 2015 M

TT H

ybrid

Atomic (TT) Pioneer® 2012 M MS MR ABHyola® 450TT Pacific Seeds 2013 ME R ABDHyola® 559TT Pacific Seeds 2012 M R-MR ABDHyola® 650TT Pacific Seeds 2013 ML R ABEPioneer® 45T01 (TT) Pioneer® 2015 M MR-MS R-MR AB

TT+R

R

Hyb

rid

Hyola® 525RT® Pacific Seeds 2014 M R-MR ABDHyola® 725RT® Pacific Seeds 2015 ML R-MR ABD3000TR Bayer 2016 E MS^ MR-MS^

* 2014 rating, ** 2013 rating, ^company provisional rating Maturity: Information provided by licensees. Maturity Key; V/very, E/early, M/mid, L/late (Range: VE, E, EM, ME, M, ML, LM, L). Blackleg: Blackleg data provided from the GRDC 2015 Spring Blackleg Management Guide. Refer to this for further information. Blackleg rating key; R/resistant, MR/moderately resistant, MS/moderately susceptible, S/susceptible, VS/very susceptible.

Triazine Tolerant and Triazine Tolerant+Roundup Ready® varieties

Table 2 TT and TT+RR varieties; commercial and agronomic information

Figure 3 Example of production values scatter chart



Triazine Tolerant and TT + RR varieties (continued)

There are several good options for Triazine Tolerant (TT) canola varieties, although the number of releases of open pollinated varieties, and the performance gains, have not kept pace with hybrid varieties. Open pollinated canola remains the overwhelming grower choice for Triazine Tolerant varieties (98% in 2014). However, hybrid varieties showed greater yield stability and a slight yield advantage over open pollinated varieties. Many of the varieties have very similar yield performance. A five percent difference in yield in Agzone 2, 5 or 6 is only around 70 kg/ha.

Open pollinated TT varietiesOpen pollinated varieties that have the best yields across the Agzones are Crusher TT and ATR Bonito. ATR Gem was also a good performer

in Agzone 1, 3 and 6. ATR Bonito and ATR Gem have excellent oil yield and low risk blackleg ratings (MR). They have good yield stability, the best of the OP varieties. The few yield results from the newly released ATR Mako are excellent.

Crusher TT has a lower oil yield and a lower blackleg rating, it was not tested in 2015 ratings but was rated medium risk (MR-MS) in 2014.

ATR Stingray is the most commonly grown canola variety in WA, with 28% of all canola plantings in 2014 (and 35% of TT plantings). It was the highest yielding open pollinated variety in Agzone 5 and is a strong contender in Agzone 2, 4 and 6, particularly in lower yielding situations. Although ATR Stingray has a high average long-term MET yield, its yields are variable, which can be seen in the spread of dots on the scatter graph.


Pro

duct

ion

Val

ues

(t/h

a)

−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.2

0.00.2

Atomic TT

1 2 3

ATR Bonito ATR Cobbler

1 2 3

ATR Gem

ATR Mako ATR Snapper ATR Stingray

−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.20.00.2

ATR Wahoo

−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.2

0.00.2

Crusher TT Hyola 450TT Hyola 525RT Hyola 559TT

Hyola 650TT Hyola 725RT Jackpot TT

−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.20.00.2

Pioneer 45T01TT

−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.2

0.00.2

1 2 3

Sturt TT Telfer

Agzone2 Agzone3 Agzone6


Pro

duct

ion

Val

ues

(t/h

a)

−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.2

0.00.2

Atomic TT

1 2 3

ATR Bonito ATR Cobbler

1 2 3

ATR Gem

ATR Mako ATR Snapper ATR Stingray

−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.20.00.2

ATR Wahoo

−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.2

0.00.2

Crusher TT Hyola 450TT Hyola 525RT Hyola 559TT

Hyola 650TT Hyola 725RT Jackpot TT

−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.20.00.2

Pioneer 45T01TT

−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.2

0.00.2

1 2 3

Sturt TT Telfer


Agzone 2Agzone 3Agzone 6Trial mean yield Visual aid

Figure 4 TT and TT+RR varieties; change in production value with trial mean yield for Agzone 2,3 and 6.



Hybrid TT varietiesThe hybrid varieties Hyola® 559TT and Hyola® 450TT have the highest yields across the Agzones. Hyola® 650TT was in the longer season trials in Agzone 2, 3 and 6, where it performed very well.

Many of the Hyola® varieties out-yielded the open pollinated varieties. The TT Hyola® varieties also showed very stable yields, this can be seen in comparing the scatter plots of Hyola® 559TT and the more variable Crusher TT (Figure 4). The Hyola® TT varieties have a higher blackleg rating than the open pollinated varieties, and good oil yields.

Atomic (TT) is a standout performer in Agzone1 (only three trials). It is moderately susceptible to blackleg, and has lower oil than other varieties.

The average yield difference between the best open pollinated variety and the best hybrid variety in each Agzone is; 0.06 t/ha in Agzone 2, 0.15 t/ha in Agzone 3, 0.05 t/ha in Agzone 5 and 0.18 t/ha in Agzone 6. There is a 0.23 t/ha difference in Agzone 1, due to the excellent performance of Atomic (TT), however, this data is based on only three trials.

Hybrid TT+RR varietiesHyola® 525RT® is competitive for yield and has excellent oil content. Hyola® 725RT® shows similar good results from the two NVT trials. They both have good blackleg ratings (R-MR) and are good options for yield performance, as well as improved weed control options.

Table 3 TT and TT+RR varieties; long term MET predicted yields as percentage of ATR Stingray (%Y), oil% and number of trials (n).

Agzone 1 Agzone 2 Agzone 3 Agzone 5 Agzone 6

Std ATR Stingray 1.0 t/ha 1.5 t/ha 2.1 t/ha 1.3 t/ha 1.6 t/ha

Variety Y% oil% n Y% oil% n Y% oil% n Y% oil% n Y% oil% n

TT

TT O

P

ATR Bonito 110 4 105 43.7 19 107 46.8 9 94 46.2 11 100 46.0 7

ATR Cobbler 96 42.0 5 85 42.8 17 83 42.6 10 84 41.0 6 71 44.3 9

ATR Gem 111 3 98 44.1 23 104 46.1 12 89 44.9 8 96 45.2 9

ATR Mako 102 43.3 5 108 45.6 3 94 44.4 4 101 41.5 2

ATR Snapper 110 44.9 5 95 45.8 16 93 46.1 9 90 44.4 6 80 46.6 8

ATR Stingray 100 42.5 7 100 43.8 28 100 44.4 15 100 44.3 14 100 45.0 12

ATR Wahoo 97 42.3 12 105 45.7 9 79 44.4 3 96 45.6 6

Crusher TT 121 37.3 3 104 42.9 12 108 43.0 13 96 42.6 8 100 43.5 9

Jackpot TT 111 2 93 41.0 7 104 45.3 3 83 42.4 2 97 45.5 3

Sturt (TT) 108 41.9 6 100 42.0 21 93 44.0 13 96 42.8 2

Telfer 85 42.8 6 87 43.0 18 80 44.6 8 74 45.5 2

TT H

y

Atomic (TT) 144 3 109 41.9 19 110 43.8 8 96 44.2 6 95 43.5 6

Hyola® 450TT 103 44.8 13 108 46.5 3 93 47.1 8 104 45.5 3

Hyola® 559TT 134 41.1 4 109 44.1 17 114 46.3 11 100 46.4 10 108 45.3 8

Hyola® 650TT 104 46.1 5 114 46.3 6 111 44.2 4

Pioneer® 45T01TT

104 44.8 11 107 46.8 4 94 46.8 5 97 45.5 3

TT+RR

Hy Hyola® 525RT 103 44.9 8 105 47.9 3 104 45.4 4

Hyola® 725RT 110 47.2 2

NVT data for Bayer 3000TR and Yetna Convenient Canola will be available after 2015 harvest. Data from early maturity trials (Agzone 1 and 5) and mid maturity-trials (Agzone 2, 3 and 6). Single results not presented. Results from many trials are more reliable than results from few trials.



WA growers have several options for Roundup Ready® canola varieties with good yields, oil and blackleg ratings. In many cases, the yields were very similar and there were no real differences between the varieties. Excellent performers across all Agzones are Pioneer® 43Y23, Nuseed GT-50 and Pioneer® 44Y24, they have reliable, high yields across years and environments. Hyola® 404RR remains a strong performer across the Agzones, although its yield is a little more variable, it has excellent oil yield. These four varieties account for 80% of all the RR canola in WA. The new varieties Pioneer® 45Y25 an Hyola® 504RR have also shown good yields.

Amongst other Roundup Ready® varieties, Pioneer® 44Y26 was showing early promise in Agzone 1 (2 NVT trials). The longer season Hyola® 600RR out-performed Hyola® 404RR in Agzone 3, with excellent oil results (2 NVT trials).

Hyola® 600RR also has the best blackleg rating (R), which is valuable for that Agzone. Nuseed GT-41 and IH30 RR both performed well in Agzone 5, again with limited results, while IH52 and DG550 RR yielded well in the higher rainfall Agzones. Rounding out the variety choice is the new IH51 with Podguard, with slightly lower yield but excellent shatter tolerance.

The open pollinated Roundup Ready® varieties did not match up to their hybrid counterparts. The best performance was by GT Cobra in Agzone 5. Otherwise there was a general difference of about 15% between GT Cobra and the hybrids, or 300kg/ha in a 2 t/ha crop.

In the early season trials in Agzone 2 and Agzone 4 (data not shown), there was very little difference between the predicted yields of the hybrid varieties.

Roundup Ready® varieties


Pro

duct

ion

Val

ues

(t/h

a)

−0.4−0.2

0.00.20.40.6

DG 550RR

1 2 3

GT Cobra GT Viper

1 2 3

Hyola 404RR

Hyola 504RR Hyola 600RR IH30 RR

−0.4−0.20.00.20.40.6

IH51 RR

−0.4−0.2

0.00.20.40.6

IH52 RR Nuseed GT−41 Nuseed GT−50 Pioneer 43Y23

1 2 3

Pioneer 44Y24 Pioneer 44Y26

1 2 3

−0.4−0.20.00.20.40.6

Pioneer 45Y25



Pro

duct

ion

Valu

es (t

/ha)

−0.4−0.2

0.00.20.40.6

DG 550RR

1 2 3

GT Cobra GT Viper

1 2 3

Hyola 404RR

Hyola 504RR Hyola 600RR IH30 RR

−0.4−0.20.00.20.40.6

IH51 RR

−0.4−0.2

0.00.20.40.6

IH52 RR Nuseed GT−41 Nuseed GT−50 Pioneer 43Y23

1 2 3


1 2 3

−0.4−0.20.00.20.40.6

Pioneer 45Y25



Figure 5 RR varieties; change in Production value, with trial mean yield for Agzone 2, 3 and 6.



Table 4 RR varieties; long term MET predicted yields as percentage of Hyola® 404RR (%Y), oil% and number of trials (n).


Std Hyola® 404RR 1.7 t/ha 1.9 t/ha 3.1 t/ha 1.9 t/ha 2.1 t/ha


Hyb

rid

DG550 RR 86 44.7 8 97 46.3 3 95 44.5 3

Hyola® 404RR 100 45.4 6 100 45.6 21 100 47.2 9 100 46.3 4 100 46.6 10

Hyola® 504RR 97 45.9 2 105 46.7 2 105 44.7 2

Hyola® 600RR 95 47.3 2 102 49.1 2 99 45.6 2

IH30 RR 97 41.9 4 97 43.3 12 104 46.1 3

IH51 RR+PodGuard 90 44.7 4 92 44.0 2 90 43.0 2

IH52 RR 90 43.2 6 98 44.1 3 91 45.0 2 96 42.9 3

Nuseed GT-41 90 42.3 4 97 43.5 14 95 44.7 4 107 47.3 3 97 44.9 7

Nuseed GT-50 97 41.1 3 100 44.2 15 103 45.4 8 41.6 103 44.9 9

Pioneer® 43Y23(RR) 99 42.6 6 103 42.7 14 106 44.2 4 102 44.1 4 103 44.6 5

Pioneer® 44Y24(RR) 98 41.6 4 99 43.6 20 103 44.7 8 101 45.4 3 103 44.4 9

Pioneer® 44Y26(RR) 102 2 93 45.8 4 99 46.2 2 86 47.0 2 94 43.2 2

Pioneer® 45Y25(RR) 97 45.5 8 108 46.1 3 105 44.4 3

OP GT Cobra 84 43.2 5 88 43.4 16 90 45.8 6 94 44.2 3 89 45.2 7

GT Viper 68 43.5 5 81 43.7 15 80 45.0 4 85 44.5 3 76 45.8 5Data from early maturity trials (Agzone 1 and 5) and mid maturity-trials (Agzone 2, 3 and 6)Single results not presented. Results from many trials are more reliable than results from few trials.

Table 5 Roundup Ready® varieties; commercial and agronomic information

Variety LicenseeRelease

YearMaturity

2015 Blackleg

rating (bare seed)

2015 Blackleg

rating with Jockey

Blackleg resistance

group

Hyb

rid

DG 550RR Seednet 2015 M MR R AB

Hyola® 404RR Pacific Seeds 2010 EM R-MR ABD

Hyola® 504RR Pacific Seeds 2016 M R^ ABD

Hyola® 600RR Pacific Seeds 2015 M-L R ABD

IH30 RR Bayer 2014 E MR R AB

IH51 RR with PodGuard™ Bayer 2015 EM R-MR R-MR A

IH52 RR Bayer 2015 M R-MR R AB

Nuseed GT-41 Nuseed 2012 EM R-MR ABF

Nuseed GT-50 Nuseed 2012 M R-MR ABF

Pioneer® 43Y23 (RR) Pioneer® 2012 E R-MR R B

Pioneer® 44Y24 (RR) Pioneer® 2013 EM R-MR R C

Pioneer® 44Y26 (RR) Pioneer® 2015 EM R-MR R ABS

Pioneer® 45Y25 (RR) Pioneer® 2015 M R-MR R BC

OP GT Cobra Nuseed 2011 EM R-MR A

GT Viper Nuseed 2011 E MR B

^Provisional company rating Maturity: Information provided by licensees. Maturity Key; V/very, E/early, M/mid, L/late (Range: VE, E, EM, ME, M, ML, LM, L). Blackleg: Blackleg data provided from the GRDC 2015 Spring Blackleg Management Guide. Refer to this for further information. Blackleg rating key; R/resistant, MR/moderately resistant, MS/moderately susceptible, S/susceptible, VS/very susceptible.



Clearfield canola varietiesAll of the Clearfield hybrid varieties performed well in the NVT trials, and there is very little difference between them.

Pioneer® 45Y86 remained the most popular variety to be sown in 2014. It is an excellent performer in the higher rainfall zones, for both yield and oil.

However, Pioneer® 45Y88 was the overall top yielding variety. It also has reasonable yield stability but the oil yield was a little lower than most other Clearfield varieties.

Figure 7 Area sown to Clearfield canola varieties in WA.Varieties shown are >= 4% of CL planned crop area in 2014. Data courtesy of CBH Group.

CL

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2013 2014

46Y83 (CL) (4 %) 44C79 (CL) (4) 43Y85 (CL) (4) Hyola 474CL (5) Hyola 575CL (6) Surpass CL (6) 45Y88 (CL) (8) 44Y84 (CL) (11) 43C80 (CL) (12) 44Y87 (CL) (12) 45Y86 (CL) (22)

Are

a so

wn

(%)


Pro

duct

ion

Valu

es (t

/ha)

−0.2−0.1

0.00.10.20.30.40.5

Archer

2 3

Banker Hyola 474CL

2 3

Hyola 575CL

Hyola 577CL Pioneer 44Y84 Pioneer 44Y87

−0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.40.5

Pioneer 44Y89

−0.2−0.1

0.00.10.20.30.40.5

2 3


2 3

Rimfire CL

Agzone 2Agzone 3Agzone 6


Pro

duct

ion

Val

ues

(t/h

a)

−0.2

−0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Archer

2 3

Banker Hyola 474CL

2 3

Hyola 575CL

Hyola 577CL Pioneer 44Y84 Pioneer 44Y87

−0.2

−0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Pioneer 44Y89

−0.2

−0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

2 3


2 3

Rimfire CL



Figure 6 CL varieties; change in production value, with trial mean yield for Agzones 2, 3 and 6.



Table 6 CL varieties; long term MET predicted yields, as percentage of Pioneer® 44Y87(CL), oil% and number of trials (n).


Std Pioneer® 44Y87(CL) 1.7 t/ha 2.0 t/ha 2.8 t/ha 1.6 t/ha 1.9 t/ha


Hyb

rid

Archer CL 105 2 100 43.1 5 102 45.5 12 86 44.5 3 100 43.9 6

Banker CL 108 45.5 2

Hyola® 474CL 90 41.1 3 96 44.6 9 98 44.0 9 109 45.3 4 102 44 7

Hyola® 575CL 89 41.5 3 97 43.8 8 99 44.6 13 109 44.0 2 103 43.8 9

Hyola® 577CL 97 45.6 4 99 46.3 6 103 45.4 4

Pioneer® 43Y85(CL) 93 38.3 3 92 44.2 4

Pioneer® 44Y87(CL) 100 2 100 42.5 4 100 42.7 6 100 43.3 3 100 42.1 4

Pioneer® 44Y89(CL) 100 44.5 3 100 44.9 3 45.5 2 103 43.3 2

Pioneer® 45Y86(CL) 101 45.4 9 101 45.5 13 99 44.7 9

Pioneer® 45Y88(CL) 102 42.7 6 102 43.3 9 45.7 2 103 42.9 6

Rimfire CL 98 43.9 2 100 45.4 4 42.8 2 100 44.1 4

OP Pioneer® 43C80(CL) 78 39.7 2 86 42.8 2

Data from early maturity trials (Agzone 1 and 5) and mid maturity-trials (Agzone 2, 3 and 6) Single results not presented. Results from many trials are more reliable than results from few trials.

Table 7 Clearfield (CL) varieties; commercial and agronomic information

Variety Licensee Release year Maturity

2015 Blackleg

rating (bare seed)

2015 Blackleg

rating with Jockey

Blackleg resistance

group

Hyb

rid

Archer CL Heritage Seeds 2012 M MR-MS R-MR –

Banker CL Heritage Seeds 2016 ML MR R-MR A

Hyola® 474CL Pacific Seeds 2011 ME R BF

Hyola® 575CL Pacific Seeds 2010 M R BF

Hyola® 577CL Pacific Seeds 2013 M R

Pioneer® 43Y85 (CL) Pioneer® 2012 E MR R-MR A

Pioneer® 44Y87 (CL) Pioneer® 2013 EM MR R-MR A

Pioneer® 44Y89 (CL) Pioneer® 2015 EM R-MR R BC

Pioneer® 45Y86 (CL) Pioneer® 2012 M MR-MS MR AB

Pioneer® 45Y88 (CL) Pioneer® 2013 M MR R-MR A

Rimfire CL Heritage Seeds 2015 EM R-MR R AB

OP Pioneer® 43C80 (CL) Pioneer® 2008 E MR C

Maturity: Information provided by licensees. Maturity Key; V/very, E/early, M/mid, L/late (Range: VE, E, EM, ME, M, ML, LM, L). Blackleg: Blackleg data provided from the GRDC 2015 Spring Blackleg Management Guide. Refer to this for further information.Blackleg rating key; R/resistant, MR/moderately resistant, MS/moderately susceptible, S/susceptible, VS/very susceptible.

The new variety Pioneer® 44Y89 has performed very well so far and has a good blackleg rating (R-MR). Pioneer® 44Y87 performed well in every Agzone. It also had the best yield stability within each Agzone, with very little variability in the scatter graph. Archer and Pioneer® 45Y86 also yielded well, especially in Agzone 3, unfortunately they are medium risk for blackleg.

Conversely, the Hyola® range have the highest blackleg ratings, and they also yielded well in most Agzones and Hyola® 577CL has oil yields on par with Pioneer® 45Y86. The new variety Rimfire CL is also producing good reliable yields. Banker CL had excellent yields in its only two trials.



WA canola licenseesAgronomy for ProfitPeter Norris +61 (0)428 850 850Bayerbayergoldenage.com.auDavid Peake +61 (0)408 780 577NPZADean McKenzie +61 (0)8 6461 6750Nuseednuseed.com.auAndrew Suverijn +61 (0)409 484 702Hugh Trenorden (North) +61 (0)437 206 313Andrew Royce (South) +61 (0)427 466 916

Pacific Seedspacificseeds.com.auSteve Lamb (Central/North) +61 (0)429 619 103Mitch Tuffley (South) +61 (0)448 014 892Pioneerpioneer.comPeter Bostock +61 (0)427 549 826Seednetseednet.com.auNevenka McLennan +61 (0)408 283 214Heritage Seedsheritageseeds.com.auSteve Amery +61 (0)409 000 398

Table 8 List of Triazine Tolerant trial sites and variety production values

Agz

one

Year

Nea

rest

tow

n

Tim

e of

sow

ing

Site

mea

n yi

eld TT OP TT Hybrid TT+RR Hy

ATR

Bon

ito

ATR

Cob

bler

ATR

Gem

ATR

Mak

o

ATR

Sna

pper

ATR

Stin

gray

ATR

Wah

oo

Cru

sher

TT

Jack

pot T

T

Stur

t TT

Telfe

r

Ato

mic

TT

Hyo

la 4

50TT

Hyo

la 5

59TT

Hyo

la 6

50TT

45T0

1TT

Hyo

la 5

25R

T

Hyo

la 7

25R

T

1

2010 Eradu 13/05 1.3 -0.25 -0.07 -0.20 -0.40

2011 Eradu 03/05 1.5 -0.23 -0.07 -0.14 -0.02 -0.29

2011 Mingenew 04/05 2.7 -0.55 -0.28 -0.55 0.04 -0.51 -1.17 0.40

2012 Mingenew 12/05 0.4 0.09 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.02 -0.06 0.11 0.17 -0.02 -0.01

Agzone 1 average -0.10 -0.25 -0.06 -0.02 -0.09 -0.21 -0.22 0.04 -0.04 -0.13 -0.42 0.30 0.11 0.20 0.18 0.33

2

2010 Eneabba 14/05 1.8 -0.04 0.04 -0.07 0.02

2011 Badgingarra 04/05 2.4 -0.12 0.10 -0.13

2011 Buntine 06/05 2.1 -0.13 0.09 -0.04 -0.05 -0.20

2011 Calingiri 03/05 2.2 -0.16 0.01 0.06 -0.03 0.13

2011 Corrigin 12/05 1.3 -0.02 0.08 0.11 0.24 0.27 -0.03

2011 Cunderdin 05/05 1.9 -0.03 0.16 0.08 0.13 -0.03

2011 Katanning 06/05 2.0 -0.49 -0.02 -0.26 -0.17 0.10 0.12

2011 Wagin 11/05 1.5 -0.03 0.11 0.14 0.16 0.22 0.18 -0.07

2011 Wickepin 11/05 1.6 0.12 0.26 0.21 0.27 0.10

2012 Badgingarra 12/05 2.1 0.05 -0.28 -0.03 -0.13 -0.06 -0.02 -0.06 -0.09 0.09

2012 Buntine 15/05 0.6 0.03 -0.05 -0.06 0.04 -0.01 -0.12 -0.16 0.04 0.00 0.15

2012 Corrigin 08/05 1.0 0.13 -0.02 0.02 0.09 0.05 0.01 -0.08 0.08 -0.02 0.18 0.08

2012 Cunderdin 15/05 0.7 0.07 0.03 -0.04 0.07 0.17 -0.13 -0.17 0.23 0.10 0.09

2012 Katanning 10/05 1.6 0.17 -0.14 0.00 -0.01 0.23 -0.06 0.08 -0.15 0.26 0.11 0.06 0.16

2012 Wagin 09/05 1.1 0.10 0.04 -0.01 0.13 0.06 -0.06 0.04 -0.13 0.11 0.07 0.18 0.07

2012 Wickepin 08/05 0.8 0.05 -0.12 -0.05 0.06 -0.19 -0.07 -0.14 -0.15 -0.10 0.28 0.08

2013 Buntine 07/05 1.6 -0.10 -0.19 -0.12 -0.28 -0.13 -0.09 -0.26 0.07 0.08 0.13 0.04 -0.06

2013 Corrigin 15/05 1.9 0.00 -0.07 -0.05 0.00 -0.07 -0.31 0.03 0.04 0.11 0.00 0.01

2013 Cunderdin 07/05 1.5 -0.04 -0.14 0.04 -0.09 0.07 -0.17 0.02 0.09 0.13 0.01 0.05

List of trial sites and variety production valuesTables 8-10 list the successful NVT trials in the early maturity series of Agzone 1 and 5 and the mid-maturity series of Agzones 2, 3 and 6. The production values are shown for every variety that was present in each trial.

The average production value for each Agzone was calculated using all the production values from the long term MET analysis, where a value is calculated for every variety, whether it was present in the trial or not.



Agz

one

Year

Nea

rest

tow

n

Tim

e of

sow

ing

Site

mea

n yi

eld TT OP TT Hybrid TT+RR Hy

ATR

Bon

ito

ATR

Cob

bler

ATR

Gem

ATR

Mak

o

ATR

Sna

pper

ATR

Stin

gray

ATR

Wah

oo

Cru

sher

TT

Jack

pot T

T

Stur

t TT

Telfe

r

Ato

mic

TT

Hyo

la 4

50TT

Hyo

la 5

59TT

Hyo

la 6

50TT

45T0

1TT

Hyo

la 5

25R

T

Hyo

la 7

25R

T

2

2013 Dandaragan 03/05 2.0 -0.09 -0.09 -0.29 -0.01 0.00 -0.41 -0.08 0.00 0.09 -0.13

2013 Katanning 22/05 2.1 -0.19 -0.20 -0.25 -0.20 -0.12 -0.35 -0.70 -0.15 0.08 0.13 0.18 -0.07 -0.11

2013 Wagin 09/05 1.6 0.01 -0.11 -0.17 -0.11 0.02 -0.21 -0.53 0.10 0.03 0.17 0.12 0.02

2013 Wickepin 16/05 1.2 0.15 -0.08 0.10 -0.15 0.07 0.12 -0.32 0.20 0.08 0.24 0.05

2014 Corrigin 17/05 1.2 -0.06 -0.14 -0.04 -0.03 -0.01 0.02 0.08 0.12 0.01 0.01

2014 Cunderdin 30/04 1.0 0.00 -0.07 -0.01 -0.05 -0.05 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.00

2014 Katanning 26/05 1.4 -0.05 -0.10 0.00 -0.06 -0.08 0.07 0.12 0.16 -0.05 0.01

2014 Wagin 19/05 1.1 -0.06 -0.12 -0.02 -0.17 -0.01 0.04 0.12 0.12 -0.01

2014 Wickepin 07/05 1.6 -0.13 -0.23 -0.09 -0.01 0.01 0.13 0.15 -0.02 0.01

Agzone 2 average 0.07 -0.25 -0.04 0.01 -0.09 -0.02 -0.06 0.04 -0.11 -0.02 -0.22 0.12 0.02 0.12 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.07

3

2010 Arthur River 10/05 1.0 0.03 0.05 0.10 -0.08

2010 Broomehill 14/05 0.7 0.11 0.11 0.03 -0.03

2010 Williams 07/05 1.2 -0.18 -0.08 -0.09 0.01

2011 Kendenup 18/05 2.3 -0.64 -0.14 -0.37 -0.32 -0.03 0.13

2011 Kojonup 16/05 2.7 -0.82 -0.04 -0.43 -0.54 0.14 0.13

2011 Williams 12/05 2.4 -0.48 -0.01 -0.23 -0.48 0.09

2012 Kendenup 18/05 2.2 0.14 -0.45 0.02 -0.24 0.00 0.07 0.14 0.01 0.05 0.15

2012 Kojonup 16/05 2.3 0.12 -0.18 0.02 -0.05 0.00 0.04 0.10 -0.02 0.11 0.09

2012 Williams 12/05 2.8 0.15 -0.43 -0.03 -0.14 -0.09 -0.01 0.13 -0.12 0.24 0.19

2013 Kendenup 08/05 2.5 -0.11 -0.16 -0.13 -0.16 -0.07 -0.16 0.09 0.16 0.24 -0.09 -0.01

2013 Kojonup 09/05 2.9 -0.16 -0.19 -0.25 -0.19 -0.10 -0.10 0.07 0.14 0.18 -0.05

2013 Williams 07/05 2.1 -0.05 -0.19 -0.28 -0.21 -0.03 0.12 0.06 0.23 0.15

2014 Kendenup 16/05 3.4 -0.01 -0.10 0.02 -0.20 -0.06 0.19 0.25 -0.03 0.04

2014 Kojonup 22/05 3.1 -0.06 -0.11 0.03 -0.14 -0.06 -0.17 0.19 0.34 -0.11 0.01 -0.04

2014 Williams 16/05 2.1 0.01 -0.08 0.03 -0.11 -0.05 -0.05 0.19 0.27 -0.05

Agzone 3 average 0.00 -0.53 -0.08 0.01 -0.32 -0.17 -0.05 0.02 -0.07 -0.23 -0.50 0.05 0.02 0.13 0.14 0.00 -0.05 0.06

5

2011 Hyden 29/04 0.4 0.09 0.10 0.15 0.13 0.21

2011 Jerramungup 12/05 1.7 -0.05 0.04 0.22 0.12 0.09 -0.08

2011 Mt. Madden 11/05 1.1 -0.08 0.02 -0.03 0.08 -0.04 -0.16

2012 Hyden 03/05 0.9 0.11 -0.09 0.00 -0.01 -0.03 0.13 0.04

2012 Jerramungup 17/05 1.4 0.12 -0.12 -0.01 -0.03 0.07 0.04 -0.10 0.13 -0.05 0.15

2012 Scaddan 10/05 1.1 0.12 -0.05 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 -0.10 0.14 0.07

2013 Hyden 08/05 1.5 0.11 0.00 0.15 -0.01 0.07 -0.20 0.14 0.16

2013 Jerramungup 05/05 1.1 -0.09 -0.08 0.37 -0.10 0.17 -0.16 -0.55 0.00 0.34 0.21 -0.23

2013 Mt. Madden 04/05 1.9 0.01 -0.06 0.24 0.18 0.01 -0.23 0.16 0.04 0.17

2013 Scaddan 06/05 1.0 0.01 -0.04 0.18 -0.15 0.07 -0.05 0.01 0.22 0.22 -0.03

2014 Hyden 17/05 0.7 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.20 0.11

2014 Jerramungup 02/05 1.4 0.03 0.07 0.19 0.01 0.10 0.15

2014 Mt. Madden 03/05 1.7 -0.01 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.19 -0.09 0.06 0.14

2014 Scaddan 14/05 0.9 0.04 -0.03 0.03 0.08 -0.15 0.09 0.03 0.13 0.00 0.09

Agzone 5 average 0.04 -0.09 -0.03 0.04 -0.01 0.13 -0.15 0.08 -0.10 0.04 -0.14 0.07 0.03 0.13 -0.02 0.05

6

2010 Gibson 07/05 1.8 -0.42 -0.38 0.16 0.00

2010 Stirlings South 26/05 1.2 -0.34 -0.34 0.23 -0.15

2011 Gibson 05/05 2.1 -0.43 -0.22 -0.10 -0.13 -0.40

2011 Munglinup 08/05 1.6 -0.27 0.16 -0.09 0.06 0.28

2011 Stirlings South 10/05 1.8 -0.38 0.04 -0.18 -0.14 0.14 0.10

2012 Gibson 11/05 1.9 0.06 -0.34 -0.04 -0.20 0.04 -0.06 -0.09 -0.30 0.02 0.13

2012 Munglinup 13/05 1.7 0.03 -0.29 -0.08 -0.19 0.15 -0.15 -0.02 -0.16 -0.03 0.14

2012 Stirlings South 25/05 2.2 0.02 -0.62 -0.07 -0.44 0.02 -0.07 0.03 -0.06 -0.10 0.17

2013 Munglinup 03/05 0.9 -0.22 -0.21 -0.14 -0.24 -0.16 -0.25 0.12 0.12 0.20 -0.11 -0.05

2013 Stirlings South 05/05 2.1 -0.27 -0.23 -0.18 -0.24 -0.18 -0.38 0.14 0.14 0.32 -0.17 -0.06

2014 Munglinup 11/05 1.3 -0.02 -0.11 -0.03 -0.07 -0.06 0.09 0.04 0.11 0.01 0.03 -0.02

Agzone 6 average -0.01 -0.47 -0.07 0.01 -0.34 0.00 -0.08 0.00 -0.07 -0.05 -0.41 -0.07 0.07 0.13 0.17 -0.05 0.06 -0.02

Table 8 (continued) List of Triazine Tolerant trial sites and variety production values



Table 9 List of Roundup Ready® trial sites and variety production valuesA

gzon

e

Year

Nea

rest

tow

n

Tim

e of

sow

ing

Tria

l mea

n yi

eld Hybrid OP

DG

550

RR

Hyo

la 4

04R

R

Hyo

la 5

04R

R

Hyo

la 6

00R

R

IH30

RR

IH51

R

R+P

odG

uard

IH52

RR

Nus

eed

GT-

41

Nus

eed

GT-

50

Pion

eer 4

3Y23

Pion

eer 4

4Y24

Pion

eer 4

4Y26

Pion

eer 4

5Y25

GT

Cob

ra

GT

Vipe

r

1

2011 Eradu 03/05 1.6 0.37 0.36 0.08 -0.222011 Mingenew 04/05 2.9 0.48 0.43 -0.02 -0.642012 Eradu 09/05 1.3 0.31 0.11 0.26 0.29 0.28 0.05 -0.172012 Mingenew 11/05 0.5 0.07 0.06 0.17 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.052013 Mingenew #N/A 0.7 0.24 0.31 0.33 0.04 0.20 0.29 0.26 0.33 0.03 -0.262014 Greenough 09/05 0.7 0.36 0.45 0.34 0.22 0.37 0.30 0.11

Agzone 1 average 0.21 0.32 0.25 -0.01 0.25 0.16 0.27 0.30 0.29 0.35 0.05 -0.21

2

2010 Miling 01/06 0.8 0.222011 Badgingarra 04/05 2.7 0.15 0.24 0.14 0.012011 Buntine 06/05 2.2 0.30 0.29 0.14 0.022011 Calingiri 03/05 2.3 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.11 0.002011 Corrigin 17/05 1.6 0.45 0.46 0.38 0.24 0.132011 Cunderdin 05/05 2.1 0.44 0.33 0.17 0.112011 Katanning 06/05 2.2 0.22 0.32 0.30 0.00 -0.262012 Badgingarra 12/05 2.4 0.22 0.14 0.15 0.30 0.22 0.02 -0.132012 Buntine 15/05 0.7 0.23 0.20 0.19 0.30 0.14 0.02 0.012012 Corrigin 08/05 1.1 0.26 0.21 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.19 0.10 0.062012 Cunderdin 15/05 0.6 0.31 0.35 0.35 0.21 0.23 0.19 0.10 0.092012 Katanning 10/05 1.8 0.47 0.51 0.43 0.35 0.38 0.18 0.042013 Buntine 07/05 1.7 0.09 0.31 0.25 0.20 0.21 0.50 0.23 -0.07 -0.212013 Corrigin 15/05 2.0 0.07 0.25 0.19 0.10 0.18 0.25 0.33 0.25 0.26 0.00 -0.182013 Cunderdin 07/05 1.7 0.04 0.35 0.34 0.07 0.30 0.25 0.40 0.26 0.14 0.01 -0.132013 Dandaragan 03/05 2.1 0.06 -0.08 -0.11 0.18 0.31 0.21 0.56 -0.12 -0.452013 Katanning 22/05 1.9 0.34 0.17 0.23 -0.01 0.20 0.42 0.27 0.56 -0.162014 Corrigin 17/05 1.2 0.07 0.30 0.27 0.11 0.23 0.22 0.40 0.24 0.12 0.202014 Cunderdin 01/05 1.0 0.03 0.22 0.17 0.07 0.07 0.16 0.21 0.31 0.20 0.13 0.192014 Eneabba 09/05 1.1 0.06 0.18 0.22 0.09 -0.01 0.14 0.12 0.31 0.21 0.28 0.14 0.362014 Katanning 26/05 1.5 0.17 0.24 0.34 0.22 0.18 0.04 0.16 0.15 0.26 0.33 0.28 0.12 0.35

Agzone 2 average 0.00 0.27 0.22 0.17 0.21 0.08 0.08 0.21 0.28 0.33 0.25 0.15 0.22 0.04 -0.10

3

2010 Mt. Barker 13/05 2.1 0.292011 Kendenup 18/05 2.5 0.23 0.26 0.27 -0.11 -0.392011 Kojonup 16/05 2.9 0.13 0.33 0.31 -0.13 -0.502012 Kendenup 18/05 2.6 0.32 0.43 0.34 0.39 0.10 -0.192012 Kojonup 16/05 2.3 0.23 0.20 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.08 -0.052013 Kendenup 08/05 2.7 0.29 0.27 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.37 0.54 -0.082013 Kojonup 09/05 3.1 0.22 0.03 0.25 0.48 0.30 -0.142014 Kendenup 16/05 3.7 0.22 0.33 0.51 0.38 0.02 0.25 0.16 0.43 0.44 0.27 0.642014 Kojonup 22/05 3.2 0.32 0.29 0.58 0.39 -0.02 0.29 0.14 0.42 0.45 0.19 0.67

Agzone 3 average 0.18 0.26 0.40 0.30 0.13 0.01 0.20 0.11 0.33 0.43 0.34 0.22 0.51 -0.03 -0.36

5

2011 Jerramungup 12/05 1.7 0.39 0.43 0.20 0.032012 Jerramungup 17/05 1.5 0.26 0.13 0.38 0.28 0.28 0.12 -0.042013 Jerramungup 05/05 1.4 0.18 0.29 0.57 0.14 0.41 0.37 0.33 -0.11 0.23 0.052014 Jerramungup 02/05 1.5 0.25 0.31 0.33 0.12 0.37 0.26 0.29 0.28 0.05

Agzone 5 average 0.11 0.30 0.37 0.37 0.13 0.43 0.28 0.34 0.31 0.04 0.18 0.01

6

2010 Munglinup 06/05 1.2 0.272011 Munglinup 08/05 1.8 0.24 0.43 0.35 0.18 -0.072011 Stirlings South 10/05 1.6 0.16 0.28 0.25 0.03 -0.192012 Gibson 11/05 2.0 0.31 0.28 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.06 -0.152012 Munglinup 13/05 1.9 0.37 0.38 0.33 0.32 0.32 0.08 -0.102012 Stirlings South 25/05 2.4 0.34 0.28 0.41 0.37 0.42 0.04 -0.322013 Munglinup 03/05 1.4 0.16 0.03 0.17 0.33 0.25 -0.142013 Stirlings South 05/05 2.3 0.49 0.14 0.30 -0.01 0.21 0.34 0.31 0.63 -0.182014 Munglinup 11/05 1.3 0.03 0.26 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.09 0.07 0.18 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.20

2014 Stirlings South #N/A 2.5 0.19 0.10 0.24 -0.06 0.19 0.00 0.24 0.25 0.13 0.45

Agzone 6 average 0.13 0.25 0.34 0.22 0.20 0.04 0.15 0.19 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.33 0.02 -0.25



Table 10 List of Clearfield trial sites and variety production valuesA

gzo

ne

Yea

r

Nea

rest

to

wn

Tim

e o

f so

win

g

Tria

l mea

n y

ield

Hybrid OP

Arc

her

Ban

ker

Hyo

la 4

74C

L

Hyo

la 5

75C

L

Hyo

la 5

77C

L

Pio

nee

r 43

Y85

Pio

nee

r 44

Y87

Pio

nee

r 44

Y89

Pio

nee

r 45

Y86

Pio

nee

r 45

Y88

Rim

fire

CL

Pio

nee

r 43

C80

1

2011 Mingenew 04/05 2.9 0.04 -0.01 0.16 -0.39

2012 Mingenew 11/05 0.5 -0.13 -0.01 0.01 -0.05 -0.05 -0.14 -0.02

- Mingenew - 0.7 0.16 -0.03 -0.05 0.10 0.06 0.16 0.13 0.18

Agzone 1 average 0.29 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.05 0.17 0.13 0.06 0.10 -0.21

2

2011 Badgingarra 04/05 2.3 -0.22 -0.11 0.14

2011 Calingiri 03/05 2.3 -0.13 -0.12 0.19

2011 Katanning 06/05 2.3 0.00 0.04 0.15

2012 Badgingarra 12/05 2.3 0.07 -0.01 0.08 0.11 0.10

2012 Katanning 10/05 1.4 -0.16 -0.02 -0.05 0.06 0.02 0.06

2013 Dandaragan 03/05 1.9 0.12 0.17 0.14 0.19

2013 Katanning 22/05 2.0 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.17 0.19 0.14 0.18

2014 Eneabba 09/05 1.5 0.10 0.25 0.00 0.07 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.05 0.15 0.02

2014 Katanning 26/05 1.8 0.08 0.29 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.08 0.15 0.06 0.13 0.10

Agzone 2 average 0.10 0.27 0.01 0.04 0.05 -0.12 0.09 0.08 0.11 0.14 0.05

3

2011 Kendenup 18/05 2.9 0.27 0.06 0.07 0.25

2011 Kojonup 16/05 2.8 0.48 -0.04 0.07 0.34

2011 Williams 12/05 2.7 0.41 -0.06 0.02 0.27

2012 Kendenup 18/05 2.2 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.07 0.17

2012 Kojonup 16/05 2.2 0.02 -0.05 -0.03 0.06 0.07 0.09

2012 Williams 12/05 3.0 0.10 -0.07 -0.05 0.15 0.22 0.18

2013 Kendenup 08/05 2.9 0.15 0.21 0.22 0.19 0.09 0.19 0.17

2013 Kojonup 09/05 3.1 0.23 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.19

2013 Williams 07/05 2.2 0.25 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.31 0.26

2014 Kendenup 16/05 3.7 0.21 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.24 0.15

2014 Kojonup 22/05 3.0 0.19 0.26 0.26 0.12 0.18 0.08 0.25 0.16

2014 Williams 16/05 2.1 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.17 0.11 0.22 0.11

Agzone 3 average 0.21 0.40 0.06 0.10 0.10 -0.18 0.14 0.13 0.18 0.21 0.14

5

2011 Jerramungup 12/05 1.7 0.18 0.20 -0.04 -0.15

2012 Jerramungup 17/05 1.5 -0.01 0.14 -0.11 0.02 -0.09 -0.18

2013 Jerramungup 05/05 1.4 -0.11 0.44 0.11 0.24 0.41 -0.11

2014 Jerramungup 02/05 1.5 -0.08 0.24 0.25 -0.01 0.10 0.29 0.00

Agzone 5 average -0.11 0.25 0.26 0.00 -0.01 0.11 0.32 -0.10 0.03 -0.13

6

2011 Munglinup 08/05 1.5 -0.09 0.02 0.00

2011 Stirlings South 10/05 2.3 -0.04 0.03 0.11

2012 Munglinup 13/05 1.7 -0.10 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.07

2012 Stirlings South 25/05 2.2 0.04 0.14 0.16 0.08 0.03 0.17

2013 Munglinup 03/05 1.4 0.14 0.27 0.26 0.20 0.05 0.15 0.20

2013 Stirlings South 05/05 2.3 0.20 0.37 0.37 0.33 0.02 0.20 0.25

2014 Munglinup 11/05 1.3 0.05 0.03 -0.01 -0.04 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.07

2014 Stirlings South 09/06 2.5 0.17 0.28 0.15 0.18 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.17 0.09

Agzone 6 average 0.08 0.29 0.11 0.13 0.13 -0.02 0.08 0.12 0.05 0.14 0.08

Figure 8 Area sown to TT canola varieties in WA Figure 9 Area sown to RR canola varieties in WA

Data courtesy of CBH Group. TT varieties shown are > 2% of planned canola crop area in 2014. RR varieties shown are ≥ 3%.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2013 2014

Are

a so

wn

(%)

TT

Bonito (2 %)

Telfer (3)

Jackpot (4)

Sturt (4)

Snapper (7)

Cobbler (9)

Gem (11)

Crusher (17)

Stingray (35) 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2013 2014

Are

a so

wn

(%)

RR

GT Viper (3)

GT Cobra (5)

IH30 RR (5)

GT-41 (5)

44Y24 (RR) (7)

43Y23 (RR) (14)

GT-50 (22)

Hyola 404RR (37)

agric.wa.gov.au nvtonline.com.au

Copies of this document are available in alternative formats upon request.

Telephone: +61 (0)8 9368 3333

Email: [email protected]

DisclaimerThe Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Agriculture and Food and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise from use or release of this information or any part of it. Copyright © Western Australia Agriculture Authority, 2015

Figure 10 Agzones in Western Australia

http://agric.wa.gov.au

http://nvtonline.com.au

mailto:enquiries%40agric.wa.gov.au?subject=

Documents

Canola variety guide for Western Australia 2016...Canola variety guide for WA 2016 4 NVT data analysis The first stage of NVT data analysis is to produce core statistics for individual