Upload
joyce
View
49
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Can the state set decent standards for gender equality? . Jill Rubery European Work and Employment Research Centre Manchester Business School University of Manchester . The importance of the public sector for gender equality . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Can the state set decent standards for gender equality?
Jill RuberyEuropean Work and Employment Research Centre
Manchester Business SchoolUniversity of Manchester
The importance of the public sector for gender equality
• Source of employment opportunities and source of support services for employment integration (only effective alternative to female domestic labour)
• Potential for protection in pay and employment practices from discrimination/ from organisation of labour market around male lifecourse
• Space for alternative social values- social choice over how to value care work, for example
Employment Working Conditions Active Promotion of Gender Equality
Employment quantity
Concentration of women’s employment
Work-life balance options to facilitate employment continuity
Childcare to facilitate labour market participation
Employment quality
Concentration of women graduates
Pay and pension premiums especially for lower skilled
Specific duties and policies or more effective implementation of national policies
Gender equality and the public sector
France Germany Hungary Sweden UK
Share of the public sector:in total employment 30 25 22 32 28in female employment 42 36 33 51 43in high-educated female employment
48 56 56 66 59
in medium-educated female employment
39 31 24 45 37
in low-educated female employment
37 26 23 33 31
Share of women in total public sector employment
67 66 69 76 70
Female employment in the public sector (NACE O, P, Q), 2010
Source: ELFS
France Right to work 50 per cent to 90 per cent time; r those on 50 per cent time e paid at 60 per cent. Also right to return to full-time work. No maternity leave ceiling unlike private sector. 12 days rather than 3 days sick child leave.
Germany Right to work part-time for family reasons and to return to full-time work plus opportunities for flexible distribution of hours and for combining part-time work with the parental leave allowance.
Hungary Civil servants have rights for more flexible working when children young but rarely used .
Sweden Collective agreement in public sector provides top ups to parental leave pay; encourage take up by fathers.
UK 31% public sector compared to 11% private sector provide additional maternity leave pay, opportunities for job sharing and flexitime and requests for part-time or flexible hours granted more often.
Work–life balance options in the public sector
Source: adapted from Rubery (2013: table 2.6).
Public-private gaps in average pay in five countries, national data 2010
All males All females
Male full-time
Female full-time
Female part-time
France 1.10 1.13 1.22Germany 0.95 1.04 0.95 1.01 1.08
Hungary 1.24 (CS)
0.851.21(CS)
0.90
Sweden 0.98 0.96UK 1.17 1.29 1.15 1.25 1.44
Women in most but not all countries paid more in public than private sectors
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
Private sector male average earnings
GERMANYHUNGARY
SWEDEN UK
FRANCE
Public and private sector pay for men and women relative to average male earnings in the private sector, 2010
But pay premium disappears if compare to male private sector pay
Interdecile - P90/P10 P10/Male private P50*
P90/Male private P50*
Public Private Public Private Public Private
FranceMale FT 2.59 2.71 0.74 0.69 1.90 1.88Female FT 2.17 2.51 0.69 0.61 1.50 1.53Female PT 2.78 3.12 0.58 0.46 1.60 1.43SwedenAll 1.77 2.17 0.73 0.72 1.30 1.56UKMale FT 3.17 4.16 0.75 0.56 2.37 2.35Female FT 2.83 3.47 0.70 0.51 1.97 1.77Female PT 3.39 2.36 0.54 0.48 1.83 1.13All 3.34 4.04 0.63 0.49 2.02 1.98
. Inter-decile wage ratios in the public and private sectors, five countries, 2010
Lower paid fare better in public sector but part-timers also have better career opportunities
Lower secondary teachers’ statutory pay France Germany Hungary Sweden UK
As % pay of all full year workers with tertiary education 2009
0.85 0.97 0.45 0.75 0.81
Trends in real pay (2000=100) 2008 2009
9191
145129
110113
109109
Trends in pay compared to GDP per capita 2000 2008 2009
1.271.051.06
No dataNo data
1.71
0.730.790.73
1.000.890.96
1.431.261.31
Comparative levels of teachers’ paySource : OECD (2011a, 2012).
High degree of social choice over pay for professions- very low pay in feminised public professions in eastern Europe
Pensions in public compared to private sector
France Final salary compared to career average and high minimum entitlements but bonuses not included- contribution rates now harmonised.
Germany Better occupational pensions and 100% coverage compared to 48% in private sector
Hungary No difference
Sweden Better than average top ups to statutory pensions
UK Extensive defined benefits pensions- important as state pension low, private sector has closed schemes and women less covered in private sector
Pensions in public compared to private sectors: importance depends on statutory system
Gender equality policy programmes and trade union equality campaigns in the public sector
Source: adapted from Anxo et al. (2010) and Rubery (2013: box 2.1 and box 2.2).
Childcare provision (under 3s)
Public sector employer equality policies
Public sector trade union equality campaigns
Germany Low enrolmentAffordable
Specific Federal Equality Act -gender equality in recruitment and promotion
Failed Ver.di campaign for gender sensitive job evaluation
France Medium/high enrolmentAffordable
Gender parity in recruitment committee; 2008 equality charter -
No trade union campaigns
Hungary Low enrolmentAffordable
No employer initiatives No trade union campaigns
Sweden High enrolmentAffordable
Both public and private sectors must have a gender equality plan
Some policies to reduce low pay r
UK Medium enrolmentNot affordable
From 2007 gender duty in public sector . Voluntary equal pay audits (40 per cent of public bodies).
Single pay spines based on gender sensitive job grading in local government, the NHS and universities.
Germany France Hungary Sweden UKEmployment opportunities Quantity 1 2 1 3 2 Quality 3 2 3 3 3 Total for employment 4 4 4 6 5Working conditions Work-life balance policies
3 3 2 3 3
Pay and pensions 3 2 1 2 3Total for working conditions
6 5 3 5 6
Active promotion of gender equality Child care provision 1 3 1 3 1 Gender equality policies 2 2 1 3 2Total for active promotion 3 5 2 6 3Overall total score 13 14 9 17 14
Variations in the contribution of the public sector to gender equality
Type of adjustment Country examplesCuts to public sector employment Reduced employment Higher work intensity
Employment cuts in UK. Restrictions on vacancy filling in France.
Change to contracts Reduced job security More internal differentiation
↑ non civil service in France- more women -lower benefits/ work life balance options.
More outsourcing Lower pay and conditions
Increased outsourcing in UK, Germany and Sweden –lower pay in UK, Germany.
Pay cuts/freezes/reforms Wider gender pay gap More managerial discretion
Pay cuts in Hungary, pay freezes in UK, France, long term ↓ Germany and France, stability Sweden
Changes to pensions Wider gender gap
Major changes to public sector pension cuts in UK
Freezing promotion opportunities Affects women’s careers
Failure to appoint to higher grades in Germany
Changes to working time Reduced work life balance
↑in full-time working hours in Germany plus ↑ in part-time work. ↑unpaid overtime in France.
Changes to equality policies Reduced attention in public and
private sectors
End to equality reviews, equality duty likely in UK
Public sector adjustment and implications for gender equality