Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47338-5 — The Return ... · strategy, negotiating or amending investment treaties with provisions that potentially give more control and greater

Cambridge University Press978-1-108-47338-5 — The Return of the Home State to Investor-State DisputesRodrigo Polanco FrontmatterMore Information

www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press

TH E R E TU RN O F TH E

HOME S T A T E TO I NV E S T O R – S T A T E

D I S P U T E S

This book advances the idea that in order to address some of the criticisms

against investor–state dispute settlement, a large majority of states have

taken a ‘normative’ strategy, negotiating or amending investment treaties

with provisions that potentially give more control and greater

involvement to the contracting parties, and notably the home state. This

is particularly true of agreements concluded in the past fifteen years. At

the same time, there is a potential revival of the ‘remnants’ of diplomatic

protection that have been embedded in investment treaties since the

beginning of the system. But why is the home state being brought back

into a domain from which it was expressly excluded several decades ago?

Why would a home state be interested in intervening in these conflicts? Is

this ‘new’ role of the home state in foreign investment disputes a ‘return’

to diplomatic protection of its nationals, or are we witnessing something

different?

rodrigo polanco is a Senior Researcher and Lecturer at the World

Trade Institute, University of Bern, a Postdoctoral Researcher at the

University of Lucerne, and a Visiting Professor at the Institute of

International Studies at the University of Chile. He is also a former

Assistant Professor of International Economic Law at the Faculty of

Law, University of Chile, where he also served as Director of

International Affairs.

www.cambridge.org/9781108473385

www.cambridge.org



cambridge international trade and economic law

Series editors

Dr Lorand Bartels, University of Cambridge

Professor Thomas Cottier, University of Berne

Professor William Davey, University of Illinois

As the processes of regionalisation and globalisation have intensified,

there have been accompanying increases in the regulations of interna-

tional trade and economic law at the levels of international, regional and

national laws. The subject matter of this series is international economic

law. Its core is the regulation of international trade, investment and

cognate areas such as intellectual property and competition policy. The

series publishes books on related regulatory areas, in particular human

rights, labour, environment and culture, as well as sustainable develop-

ment. These areas are vertically linked at the international, regional and

national level, and the series extends to the implementation of these rules

at these different levels. The series also includes works on governance,

dealing with the structure and operation of related international organisa-

tions in the field of international economic law, and the way they interact

with other subjects of international and national law.

Books in the series

The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes: Bringing Back

Diplomatic Protection?

Rodrigo Polanco

The Public International Law of Trade in Legal Services

David Collins

Industrial Policy and the World Trade Organization: Between Legal

Constraints and Flexibilities

Sherzod Shadikhodjaev

The Prudential Carve-Out for Financial Services: Rationale and Practice in

the GATS and Preferential Trade Agreements

Carlo Maria Cantore

Judicial Acts and Investment Treaty Arbitration

Berk Demirkol

Distributive Justice and World Trade Law: A Political Theory of

International Trade Regulation

Oisin Suttle

Freedom of Transit and Access to Gas Pipeline Networks under WTO Law

Vitalily Pogoretskyy

Reclaiming Development in the World Trading System, 2nd edition

Yong-Shik Lee


www.cambridge.org



Developing Countries and Preferential Services Trade

Charlotte Sieber-Gasser

WTO Dispute Settlement and the TRIPS Agreement: Applying Intellectual

Property Standards in a Trade Law Framework

Matthew Kennedy

Establishing Judicial Authority in International Economic Law Edited by

Joanna Jemielniak, Laura Nielsen and Henrik Palmer Olsen

Trade, Investment, Innovation and Their Impact on Access to Medicines:

An Asian Perspective

Locknie Hsu

The Law, Economics and Politics of International Standardisation

Panagiotis Delimatsis

The WTO and International Investment Law: Converging Systems

Jürgen Kurtz

Export Restrictions on Critical Minerals and Metals: Testing the Adequacy

of WTO Disciplines

Ilaria Espa

Optimal Regulation and the Law of International Trade: The Interface

between the Right to Regulate and WTO Law

Boris Rigod

The Social Foundations of World Trade: Norms, Community and

Constitution

Sungjoon Cho

Public Participation and Legitimacy in the WTO

Yves Bonzon

The Challenge of Safeguards in the WTO

Fernando Piérola

General Interests of Host States in International Investment Law Edited by

Giorgio Sacerdoti, with Pia Acconci, Mara Valenti and Anna De Luca

The Law of Development Cooperation: A Comparative Analysis of the

World Bank, the EU and Germany

Philipp Dann

WTO Disciplines on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Balancing

Policy Space and Legal Constraints

Dominic Coppens

Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies: Experiences of the Most

Active WTO Members Edited by

Müslüm Yilmaz

The Relevant Market in International Economic Law: A Comparative

Antitrust and GATT Analysis

Christian A. Melischek


www.cambridge.org



International Organizations in WTO Dispute Settlement: How Much

Institutional Sensitivity?

Marina Foltea

Public Services and International Trade Liberalization: Human Rights and

Gender Implications

Barnali Choudhury

The Law and Politics of WTO Waivers: Stability and Flexibility in Public

International Law

Isabel Feichtner

African Regional Trade Agreements as Legal Regimes James Thuo Gathii

Liberalizing International Trade after Doha: Multilateral, Plurilateral,

Regional, and Unilateral Initiatives

David A. Gantz

Processes and ProductionMethods (PPMs) inWTO Law: Interfacing Trade

and Social Goals

Christiane R. Conrad

Non-Discrimination in International Trade in Services: ‘Likeness’ inWTO/

GATS

Nicolas F. Diebold

The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation inWTODispute Settlement

Edited by

Chad P. Bown and Joost Pauwelyn

The Multilateralization of International Investment Law

Stephan W. Schill

Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO: A Law and

Economics Analysis

Simon A. B. Schropp


www.cambridge.org



TH E R E TU RN O F TH E

HOME S T A T E TO

I N V E S T O R – S T A T E

D I S P U T E S

Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection?

ROD R I GO PO L ANCOUniversity of Bern


www.cambridge.org



University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom

One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006, USA

477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia

314–321, 3rd Floor, Plot 3, Splendor Forum, Jasola District Centre,New Delhi – 110025, India

79 Anson Road, #06-04/06, Singapore 079906

Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge.

It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit ofeducation, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence.

www.cambridge.orgInformation on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781108473385

DOI: 10.1017/9781108628983

© Rodrigo Polanco 2019

This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exceptionand to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,no reproduction of any part may take place without the written

permission of Cambridge University Press.

First published 2019

Printed and bound in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, Elcograf S.p.A.

A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library.

ISBN 978-1-108-47338-5 Hardback

Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy ofURLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publicationand does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain,

accurate or appropriate.


www.cambridge.org



CONTENTS

List of Tables page xiiAcknowledgements xiiiList of Abbreviations xivTable of Cases xviiiTable of Treaties xxvi

Introduction 1

A The Background 1

B The Problem 3

C The Thesis 4

D Methodology 7

E Structure 9

I The Age of Diplomatic Protection of ForeignInvestors 11

A The Foundations of Diplomatic Protection 11

1 The Calvo Doctrine and the Calvo Clause 14

2 Evolution of Diplomatic Protection 18

B Diplomatic Protection in InvestmentDisputes 221 International Arbitration 22

2 Binational Claims Commissions and Mixed Arbitral

Tribunals 24

3 Lump-Sum Agreements 26

4 International Adjudication 27

vii


www.cambridge.org



II The Rise of and Backlash against Investor–StateArbitration 29

A Origins and Evolution of Investor–StateArbitration 301 Before the ICSID Convention 30

2 After the ICSID Convention 32

B Why Investor–State Arbitration WasCreated 35

1 To Depoliticize the Dispute 36

2 Limitations of Diplomatic Protection 38

(a) Exhaustion of Local Remedies 38

(b) Nationality of the Investor 40

(c) Available Remedies 42

3 To Overcome Barriers at Host State Courts 43

C Criticisms of Investor–State Arbitration 461 Against the System of Investor–State Arbitration 46

2 Against the Functioning of Investor–State Arbitration 48

III Home States and the Prevention of InvestmentDisputes 53

A Home State Interests in Preventing InvestmentDisputes 53

B Tools for Prevention of Investment Disputes InvolvingHome States 56

1 Prevention of Disputes in IIAs 56

(a) Investment Facilitation and Investor Liability in Model

IIAs 56

(b) The New Brazilian Model 59

(c) Other Treaties 62

2 Prevention by Review of IIAs’ Implementation 65

(a) Direct Review by the Contracting Parties 67

(b) Institutional Review of the Agreement 70

3 Prevention of Investment Disputes Based on Principles of

International Law 74

(a) International Principles and Standards on Corporate Social

Responsibility 74

(b) Principles on Business and Human Rights 77

(c) ILO and UNCTAD Frameworks 79

viii contents


www.cambridge.org



(d) Emerging Principles of International Law 81

4 Implementing Rules and Principles for the Prevention of

Investment Disputes 82

5 The Nature of Home State Prevention of Investment

Conflicts 86

IV Home State Role in ISDS Together with the HostState 89

A Filtering of Claims 891 Types of Filtering Mechanisms 90

(a) Taxation Measures 90

(b) Public Welfare Measures 96

2 Use of Filtering Mechanisms in ISDS 97

3 The Nature of Filtering Mechanisms in ISDS 100

B Joint State Interpretation of IIAs 1031 Abstract Interpretation 109

(a) Direct Interpretation by the Parties 109

(b) Interpretation by a Treaty Body 111

2 Intra-Arbitral Interpretation 113

(a) General Renvoi 113

(b) Interpretation of Reservations, Exceptions or

NCMs 114

(c) Financial Measures 117

3 The Effective Use of Joint Interpretations 118

(a) NAFTA Free Trade Commission

Interpretations 120

(b) CCFTAC Notes of Interpretation 124

(c) Joint Interpretative Statements by States 126

4 The Nature of Joint State Interpretations in ISDS 131

C Technical Referral to Domestic Authorities 138

1 Taxation Measures 139

2 Financial Services 141

3 The Nature of Technical Referrals in ISDS 148

D Regulating the Work of Tribunals 1511 Selection of Arbitrators 151

2 The New EU Approach: Standing Investment

Courts 154

(a) Establishment of the Tribunal 157

contents ix


www.cambridge.org



(b) Limited Scope 158

(c) Regulation of Proceedings 159

(d) Appellate Tribunal 160

(e) Reception of the Investment Courts System 161

3 Code of Conduct 163

4 Adoption of Supplemental Rules of Procedure 165

5 The Nature of Regulating the Work of Tribunals in

ISDS 166

V Unilateral Home State Participation in ISDS 167

A Non-Disputing State Party Interventions 167

1 Regulated in the Treaty 167

(a) Different Types of Participation 169

(b) Treaty Case Law 173

2 Unilateral Interpretations of Home States 186

3 The Nature and Value of Non-Disputing State Party

Intervention 189

B Consultation of Draft Awards or Decisions 195

C Enforcement of ISDS Awards 1961 Inter-State Arbitration 200

2 International Adjudication 201

3 Home State Countermeasures 202

(a) Withdrawal or Suspension of Trade Benefits 205

(b) Voting against Loans 209

VI Current and Future Roles of Diplomatic Protection inInvestment Disputes 212

A Limited Exclusion of Diplomatic Protection inInvestment Treaties 215

1 Limitations in the ICSID Convention 215

2 Limitations in Other Investment Treaties 217

3 Limitations in Other Arbitral Rules 220

4 Implied Limitations 221

B Current Mechanisms of Diplomatic Protection inInvestment Disputes 2221 Consular Assistance/Diplomatic Action 223

(a) To Facilitate the Settlement of a Dispute 225

x contents


www.cambridge.org



(b) Diplomatic Pressure 227

2 State-to-State Dispute Settlement 231

(a) Diplomatic Methods 234

(b) Treaty Review 238

(c) State-to-State Adjudication 240

(d) State-to-State Arbitration 246

VII Home State Limitations on DiplomaticProtection 274

A Why Home States Do Not Intervene 2741 Who Is the Home State? 275

2 Home State and Its Nationals May Have Competing

Interests 284

3 The Reserved Nature of Diplomatic Intervention 289

B Lessons Learned: The Relevance of Peaceful DiplomaticProtection 2911 Jurisdictional Issues 293

2 The Appointment of Decision-Makers 295

3 A Balanced or a Biased Mechanism? 296

4 The Shortcomings and Legacy of Claims Commissions and Mixed

Arbitral Tribunals 301

Conclusion 306

A Bringing Back the Home State to InvestmentDisputes 306

B There Is No ‘Return’ of DiplomaticProtection 308

Bibliography 313Index 339

contents xi


www.cambridge.org



TABLES

3.1 IIAs with provisions on review of implementation page 65

4.1 IIAs with provisions on filtering of claims 90

4.2 IIAs with joint interpretation provisions 107

4.3 IIAs with technical referral provisions 139

4.4 IIAs with provisions regulating the work of tribunals 152

5.1 IIAs, including NDSP submissions 170

5.2 United States’ NDSP submissions as home state in NAFTA 174

5.3 Canada’s NDSP submissions as home state in NAFTA 177

5.4 United States’ NDSP submissions as home state in CAFTA–DR 181

7.1 Home countries in more than ten ISDS cases 277

7.2 ISDS cases with several home states (2003–2017) 278

xii


www.cambridge.org



ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This book is an updated version of my doctoral thesis at the GraduateSchool of Economic Globalisation and Integration of the World TradeInstitute (WTI) at the University of Bern, written during the years 2013–2015. I owe my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Professor ThomasCottier, and my co-supervisor, Professor Krista Nadakavukaren Schefer.Their encouragement, guidance and support made the research andwriting of this work a rewarding and enriching experience. I am furtherindebted to my fellow doctoral researchers, my colleagues and the staff ofthe WTI for all the support and valuable comments received during mytime as a PhD student. Special thanks to the generosity of theWTI/SECOProject for the funding of my studies, and to all the people who made myacademic stay in Switzerland possible – in particular Roberto Echandi,Susan Kaplan, Shaheeza Lalani, Barry Peterson and Pierre Sauvé, as wellas Dorotea López and the Institute of International Studies at theUniversity of Chile.

I am most thankful to my parents, Carlos and Carmen, for theircontinuous example of love and perseverance. Most importantly, thisbook would not have been possible without the unconditional supportand love of my dear wife Barbara and our children Tomás and Laura: thiswork is dedicated to them.

xiii


www.cambridge.org



ABBREVIATIONS

ACHPR African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights

ADR alternative dispute resolution

ALBA Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America

App. appendix

Art./Arts. article / articles

ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations

ATFA American Task Force Argentina

ATPA Andean Trade Preference Act

BEE Black Economic Empowerment

BIT bilateral investment treaty

BLEU Belgium–Luxembourg Economic Union

CACM Central American Common Market

CAFTA–DR Dominican Republic–Central America–United States FTA

CANACAR Cámara Nacional del Autotransporte de Carga

CARICOM Caribbean Community

CCFTAC Canada–Chile Free Trade Agreement Commission

CCIA COMESA Common Investment Area

CCJ Caribbean Court of Justice

CEFTA Central European Free Trade Agreement

CEO Corporate Europe Observatory

CEPA closer economic partnership arrangement

CETA Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement

CFIA cooperation and facilitation investment agreement

Ch. chapter

CIS Commonwealth of Independent States

CMM conflict management mechanism

COMESA Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa

Comm. Commentaries

CPTPP Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific

Partnership

CSR corporate social responsibility

DPP dispute prevention policy

DRC Democratic Republic of the Congo

xiv


www.cambridge.org



EC European Commission

ECA economic cooperation agreement

ECC Economic Cooperation Committee

ECFA Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement

ECJ European Court of Justice

ECO Economic Cooperation Organization

ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States

ECT Energy Charter Treaty

EEC Eurasian Economic Community

EEU Eurasian Economic Union

EFTA European Free Trade Association

EPA economic partnership agreement

ETEA Economic and Trade Expansion Agreement

EU European Union

FCNA friendship, commerce and navigation agreement

FCPA Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (United States)

FDFA Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (Switzerland)

FDI foreign direct investment

FET fair and equitable treatment

FIPA foreign investment promotion and protection agreement

fn footnote

FPS full protection and security

FTA free trade agreement

FTC Free Trade Commission

GSP Generalized System of Preferences

IACHR Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

IADB Inter-American Development Bank

IAISD International Agreement on Investment for Sustainable

Development (of IISD)

IBA International Bar Association

ICC International Chamber of Commerce

ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

ICJ International Court of Justice

ICS Investment Court System

ICSID International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes

ICSID Convention Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes

between States and Nationals of Other States

ICTSD International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development

IEL international economic law

IIA international investment agreement

IISD International Institute for Sustainable Development

ILC International Law Commission

list of abbreviations xv


www.cambridge.org



ILO International Labour Organization

IMS international minimum standard

IPA investment protection agreement

IPFSD Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development

ISA investor–state arbitration

ISDN Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator

ISDS investor–state dispute settlement

JBIC Japan Bank for International Cooperation

JC joint committee

LDC least-developed country

MAI Multilateral Agreement on Investment (OECD)

MERCOSUR Southern Common Market

MFN most-favoured nation

MIC multilateral investment court

MNE multinational enterprise

NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement

NCM non-conforming measure

NCP national contact point

NDSP non-disputing state party

NT national treatment

OAS Organization of American States

OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

OPIC Overseas Private Investment Corporation

PAAP Pacific Alliance Additional Protocol

PACER Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations

PCA Permanent Court of Arbitration

PCIJ Permanent Court of International Justice

R2P responsibility to protect

RIA regional investment agreement

RICO Act Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (United

States)

RIT regional investment treaty

SAA stabilization and association agreement

SADC Southern African Development Community

SAFTA Singapore–Australia Free Trade Agreement

SCC Stockholm Chamber of Commerce

SMEs small and medium-sized enterprises

SNIS Swiss Network for International Studies

SPA Serbian Privatization Agency

SWF sovereign wealth funds

TBT Agreement Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade

TNI Transnational Institute

xvi list of abbreviations


www.cambridge.org



TPA trade promotion agreement

TPP Trans-Pacific Partnership

TRIPS Agreement Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property

Rights

TTIP Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

UAE United Arab Emirates

UK United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

UN United Nations

UNCITRAL United Nations Commission on International Trade Law

UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

UNEP United Nations Environment Programme

UNGC United Nations Global Compact

UNRIAA United Nations Reports of International Arbitral Awards

US United States of America

USTR United States Trade Representative

VCCR Vienna Convention on Consular Relations

VCDR Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations

VCLT Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

WTO World Trade Organization

list of abbreviations xvii


www.cambridge.org



TABLE OF CASES

Unless otherwise indicated, in addition to the sources indicated in this section, the text

of awards and decisions cited in this book can be found in Investment Treaty

Arbitration: www.italaw.com/

Abaclat and ors v.Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/07/5 (formerly Giovanna a

Beccara and ors v. The Argentine Republic). Statement of Dissent of Dr Santiago

Torres Bernárdez to Procedural Order No 27, 30 May 2014

Abaclat and ors v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/07/5. Statement of Dissent

of Dr. Santiago Torres Bernárdez to Procedural Order No 32, 1 August 2014

Achmea BV v. Slovak Republic, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No 2008–13 (formerly Eureko

BV v. Slovak Republic). Award on Jurisdiction, Arbitrability and Suspension, 26

October 2010, paras 155–163

ADF Group Inc. v.United States of America, ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/00/1, Award, 9

January 2003

Affaire des biens britanniques au Maroc espagnol (Spain v. United Kingdom),

Judgment 1 May 1925 II UNRIAA 615–742

Aguas del Tunari, SA v. Republic of Bolivia, ICSID Case No ARB/02/3, Decision on

Respondent’s Objections to Jurisdiction, 21 October 2005

Anglo–Iranian Oil Co. case (United Kingdom v. Iran) Jurisdiction, Judgment 22 July

1952 [1952] ICJ Rep. 93

Archer Daniels Midland Co. and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc. v. The United

Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/04/5, Award, 21 November 2007

Arif (Franck Charles) v. Republic of Moldova, ICSID Case No ARB/11/23. Award, 8

April 2013

Asian Agricultural Products Ltd v. Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No ARB/87/3, Final award on

merits and damages, (1991) 6 ICSID Rev-FILJ 526

Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (AAPL) v. Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No ARB/

87/3, Final Award, 27 June 1990

Autopista Concesionada de Venezuela, CA v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID

Case No ARB/00/5, Award of the Tribunal, 23 September 2003

Autopista Concesionada de Venezuela, CA v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela,

Decision on Jurisdiction. 27 September 2001, 16 ICSID Review 469–514

Aven (David R.) and ors v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No UNCT/15/3, US

Article 10.20.2 Submission, 12 February 2016

xviii


www.cambridge.org



Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. US), 2004 I.C.J. 12 (March 31)

Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, Award, 24 July 2006

Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, Decision on the

Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 1 September 2009

Banro American Resources, Inc. and Société Aurifere du Kivu et du Maniema SARL v.

Democratic Republic of the Congo, ICSID Case No ARB/98/7, Award 1 September

2000 (2002) 17 ICSID Review 382–92

Banro American Resources, Inc. and Société Aurifere du Kivu et du Maniema SARL v.

Democratic Republic of the Congo, ICSID Case No ARB/98/7, Award, 1 September

2000 (2002) 17 ICSID Review 382–92

Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co., Ltd (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment Second

Phase, 5 February 1970 [1970] ICJ Rep. 32

Bayview Irrigation District et al. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/

05/1, Award, 19 June 2007

Berkowitz (Aaron C.), Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence

International Investments and ors) v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No

UNCT/13/2, US Article 10.20.2 Submission, 17 April 2015

Bridgestone Licensing Services, Inc. and Bridgestone Americas, Inc. v. Republic of

Panama, ICSID Case No ARB/16/34, Decision on Expedited Objections, 13

December 2017


Panama, ICSID Case No ARB/16/34, US Submission Pursuant to Article 10.20.2 of

the US–Panama TPA, 28 August 2017


Panama, ICSID Case No ARB/16/34, US Supplemental Submission Pursuant to

Article 10.20.2 of the US–Panama TPA, 25 September 2017

Camuzzi International SA v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/03/2. Decision

on Objection to Jurisdiction, 11 May 2005

CANACAR v. United States of America. Notice of Arbitration, 2 April 2009

Canfor Corp. v. United States of America; Tembec et al. v. United States of America;

Terminal Forest Products Ltd v. United States of America, UNCITRAL. Joint Order

on the Costs of Arbitration and for the Termination of Certain Arbitral Proceedings,

19 July 2007, para. 111

Cargill, Inc. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/05/2, Award, 18

September 2009

Chemtura Corp. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL (formerly Crompton Corp. v.

Government of Canada), Award, 2 August 2010

Chevron Corp. (USA) and Texaco Petroleum Co. (USA) v. Republic of Ecuador (PCA

Case No 34877) Final Award, 31 August 2011

Chevron Corp. (USA) and Texaco Petroleum Co. (USA) v. Republic of Ecuador,

UNCITRAL, PCA Case No 34877. Partial Award on Merits, 30 March 2010

Chorzów (Case Concerning the Factory at) (Germany v. Poland) Claim for Indemnity

(Merits), 1928 P.C.I.J. (ser. A), No 17 (13 September 1928)

table of cases xix


www.cambridge.org



CME Czech Republic BV v. Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Final Award, 14 March 2003

CMS Gas Transmission Co. v.Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/01/8. Decision

of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine

Republic, 25 September 2007

CMS Gas Transmission Co. v. Republic of Argentina. Decision of the Tribunal on

Objections to Jurisdiction, 1 July 2003

Compañía del Desarrollo de Santa Elena SA v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No

ARB/96/1, Final Award, 17 February 2000

Corn Products International, Inc. v.United Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/

04/1, Decision on Responsibility, 15 January 2008

Corn Products International, Inc. v.United Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/

04/1, Separate Opinion of Andreas F. Lowenfeld, 18 August 2009

Corona Materials LLC v. Dominican Republic, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/14/3, Award

on the Respondent’s Expedited Preliminary Objections in Accordance with Article

10.20.5 of the DR-CAFTA, 31 May 2016

Cross-Border Trucking Services (In the Matter of) (Secretariat File No USA-MEX-98–

2008-01). Final Report of the Panel, 6 February 2001

Detroit International Bridge Co. v. Government of Canada (UNCITRAL), Procedural

Order N° 6, 18 March 2014, and Procedural Order N° 7, 25 March 2014

Diallo (Ahmadou Sadio), Case Concerning (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic

Republic of the Congo), Compensation, Judgment of 19 June 2012 [2012] ICJ

Rep 324


Republic of the Congo), Merits, Judgment 30 November 2010 [2010] ICJ Rep 639


Republic of the Congo), Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 24 May 2007, [2007]

ICJ Rep. 582

Elettronica Sicula SPA (ELSI) (United States of America v. Italy), Dissenting Opinion of

Judge Schwebel, 20 July 1989 [1989] ICJ Rep. 1

Elettronica Sicula SPA (ELSI) (United States of America v. Italy), Judgment 20 July 1989

[1989] ICJ Rep. 1

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Government of Canada. Government of Canada Submission on

Procedural Issues, 2 May 2014

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, ICSID Case No UNCT/14/2,

Award, 16 March 2017

Empresas Lucchetti, SA and Lucchetti Peru, SA v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No

ARB/03/4 (also known as: Industria Nacional de Alimentos, AS and Indalsa Perú SA

v. Republic of Peru), Award, 7 February 2005

EnCana Corp. v. Republic of Ecuador, LCIA Case No UN3481, UNCITRAL (formerly

EnCana Corp. v. Government of the Republic of Ecuador), Award, 3 February 2006

Enron Corp. and Ponderosa Assets, LP v.Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/01/3.

Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 January 2004

Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 US 64 (1938)

xx table of cases


www.cambridge.org



Ethyl Corp. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL Award on Jurisdiction, 24 June

1998

Fabiani (Antoine ) Case (1902 French–Venezuelan Commission), 31 July 1905, X

UNRIAA 83–139

Finnish shipowners against Great Britain in respect of the use of certain Finnish vessels

during the war (Claim of). (Finland v. Great Britain). Award, 9 May 1934, 3

UNRIAA 1481

Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/02/

1, Decision on the Preliminary Question, 17 July 2003

Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines, ICSID

Case No ARB/11/12, Award, 10 December 2014

Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines,

ICSID Case No ARB/03/25, Award, 16 August 2007

Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines,

ICSID Case No ARB/03/25. Decision on the Application for Annulment of Fraport

AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide, 23 December 2010

GAMI Investments Inc. v. United Mexican States, UNCITRAL, US 1128 Submission,

30 June 2003

GAMI Investments, Inc. v. Government of the United Mexican States, UNCITRAL,

Final Award, 15 November 2004

Gas Natural SDG, SA v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/03/10, Decision of

the Tribunal on Preliminary Questions on Jurisdiction, 17 June 2005

Gentini Case (1903) Mixed Claims Commission Italy–Venezuela, X RIAA 551–561

Glamis Gold, Ltd v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, Award, 8 June 2009

Gold Reserve Inc. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/09/1,

Award, 22 September 2014

Gottlieb Investors Group v. Government of Canada. Determination under NAFTA

Article 2103–6 on expropriation claim. Letter to Gottlieb Investors Group indicating

determination, 29 April 2008, TDM, www.transnational-dispute-management.com

/legal-and-regulatory-detail.asp?key=5448

Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic v. Sanum Investment Ltd, SGHC

15 (High Court of Singapore, Judgment of 20 January 2015)

Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd et al. v. United States of America,

UNCITRAL, Award, 12 January 2011

Gruslin (Philippe) v. Malaysia, ICSID Case No ARB/99/3, Award, 27 November 2000

Hulley Enterprises Ltd (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No AA 226, Final

Award, 18 July 2014

Hulley Enterprises Ltd (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No AA

226, Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 November 2009

Interhandel case (Switzerland v. United States of America), Preliminary Objections,

Judgment 21 March 1959 [1959] ICJ Rep 6

International Thunderbird Gaming Corp. v. United Mexican States, UNCITRAL,

Award, 26 January 2006

table of cases xxi


www.cambridge.org



Italba Corp. v.Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case No ARB/16/9, Submission of

the US, 9 November 2017

Italian Republic v. Republic of Cuba, Ad hoc State–State Arbitration, Final Award, 1

January 2008

Italian Republic v. Republic of Cuba, Ad hoc State–State Arbitration, Dissenting

Opinion of Attila Tanzi, 1 January 2008

Italian Republic v.Republic of Cuba, Ad hoc State–State Arbitration, InterimAward, 15

March 2005

Jaworzina (Question of), Advisory Opinion, 1923 P.C.I.J. (ser. B) No 8 (December 6)

Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) v.UnitedMexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/1,

Award, 16 December 2002 (2002) para. 116

Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) v.UnitedMexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/1,

Canada’s NAFTA Second Article 1128 Submission, 28 June 2001

Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) v.UnitedMexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/1.

Interim Decision on Preliminary Jurisdictional Issues, 6 December 2000

Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) v.UnitedMexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/1.

Submission of the United States on Preliminary Issues. 6 October 2000

Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana v. Namibia), 1999 I.C.J. 1045 (13 December)

La Oroya (Community of) v. Peru, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights,

Report No 76/09, Petition 1473–06, Admissibility, 5 August 2009

Lemire (Joseph Charles) v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No ARB/06/18, Award, 28 March

2011, paras. 248–249

Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen v. United States of America, ICSID Case

No ARB(AF)/98/3, Mexico Third 1128 Submission 2 February 2002


No ARB(AF)/98/3, Reply of the United States of America to the Counter-Memorial

of the LoewenGroup, Inc. onMatters of Jurisdiction and Competence, 26 April 2002


No ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, 26 June 2013

Mavrommatis Jerusalem Concessions (Greece v. UK), 1925 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No 5

(March 26), Judgment 26 March 1925

Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v. UK), 1924 P.C.I.J. (ser. B) No 3

(August 30)

Merrill & Ring Forestry LP v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, ICSID

Administered Case, Award 31 March 2010

Mesa Power Group, LLC v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No 2012–

17, Award, 24 March 2016

Metalclad Corp. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30

August 2000

Metalclad Corp. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/97/1. Submission

of the Government of the United States of America, 9 November 1999

Methanex Corp. v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on

Petitions from Third Persons to Intervene as ‘amici curiae’, 15 January 2001

xxii table of cases


www.cambridge.org



Methanex Corp. v.United States of America, UNCITRAL, Final Award of the Tribunal

on Jurisdiction and Merits, 3 August 2005

Methanex Corp. v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, Second Submission of

Canada Pursuant to NAFTA Article 1128, 30 April 2001

Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corp. v. Canada, ICSID Case No ARB

(AF)/07/4, Canada’s Counter-Memorial 1 December 2009

Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corp. v. Canada, ICSID Case No ARB

(AF)/07/4. Decision on Liability and on Principles of Quantum, 22 May 2012

Mondev International Ltd v.United States of America, Canada 1128 Submission, 6 July

2001

Mondev International Ltd v. United States of America, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/2,

Award, 11 October 2002

National Grid plc v.Argentine Republic, UNCITRAL. Decision on Jurisdiction, 20 June

2006

Neer (L. F. H.) and Pauline Neer (United States of America v. United Mexican States),

15 October 1926, IV UNRIAA 60–66

Norwegian Loans (Case of Certain) (France v. Norway). Judgment, 6 July 1957 [1957]

ICJ Rep 9

Nottebohm case (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala), Judgment 6 April 1955 [1955] ICJ

Reports 4

O’Keefe v. Loewen Group, Inc., No 91–67-423 (Miss. Circ. Ct 1st Jud. Dist., Hinds

County 1995)

Pac Rim Cayman LLC v. Republic of El Salvador, ICSID Case No ARB/09/12, Decision

on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections, 1 June 2012

Philip Morris Asia Ltd v. Commonwealth of Australia, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No

2012–12, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 17 December 2015

Pious Fund of the Californias Case (United States of America v. Mexico), Award, 14

October 1902, IX UNRIAA 1–14

Plama Consortium Ltd v. Republic of Bulgaria, Award, 27 August 2008

Pope & Talbot Inc. v.Government of Canada, Supplemental Submissions of the United

Mexican States, 25 May 2000

Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL. Award in Respect of

Damages, 31 May 2002

Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL. Award on the Merits of

Phase 2, 10 April 2001

Railroad Development Corp. v. Republic of Guatemala, ICSID Case No ARB/07/23.

Award, 29 June 2012

Railroad Development Corp. v. Republic of Guatemala, ICSID Case No ARB/07/23.

Submission of the United States of America, 31 January 2012

Renco Group, Inc. v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No UNCT/13/1, Non-Disputing

State Party Submission of the United States of America, 10 September 2014

table of cases xxiii


www.cambridge.org



Renco Group, Inc. v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No UNCT/13/1. Decision as to the

Scope of the Respondent’s Preliminary Objections under Article 10.20.4, 18

December 2014

Renco Group, Inc. v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No UNCT/13/1, Second Non-

Disputing State Party Submission of the United States of America, 1 September 2015

Renco Group, Inc. v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No UNCT/13/1, Third Non-

Disputing State Party Submission of the United States of America, 11 October 2015

Renco Group, Inc. v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No UNCT/13/1, Partial Award on

Jurisdiction, 15 July 2016

Renco Group, Inc. v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No UNCT/13/1, Award, 9

November 2016

Republic of Ecuador v. United States of America (PCA Case No 2012–5), Statement of

Defense, 29 March 2012

Republic of Ecuador v. United States of America (PCA Case No 2012–5). Expert

Opinion with Respect to Jurisdiction, Professor W. Michael Reisman, 24 April 2012

Republic of Ecuador v. United States of America (PCA Case No 2012–5). Request for

Arbitration, 28 June 2011

Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No 2016–13.

Respondent’s Comments on Article 1128 Submissions from USA and Mexico, 12

July 2017

Roberts (Harry) (United States of America v. United Mexican States), 2 November

1926, IV UNRIAA 77–81

S. D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 November

2000

S. D.Myers, Inc. v.Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Separate Opinion byDr Bryan

Schwartz, 13 November 2000

S. D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Second Partial Award, 21

October 2002

Sanum Investments Ltd v. Lao People’s Democratic Republic, UNCITRAL, PCA Case

No 2013–13, Award on Jurisdiction, 13 December 2013

Sanum Investments Ltd v. Lao People’s Democratic Republic, UNCITRAL, PCA Case

No 2013–13. Settlement Agreement, 15 June 2014

SAUR International SA v. Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No ARB/04/4, Decision

on Jurisdiction and Liability, 6 June 2012

Sempra Energy International v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/02/16,

Decisions on Objections to Jurisdiction, 11 May 2005

Siemens AG v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/02/8, Decision on

Jurisdiction, 3 August 2004

Siemens AG v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/02/8. Submission by the

United States of America to the ad hoc Annulment Committee regarding Articles 53

and 54, 1 May 2008

Smith (Walter Fletcher) Claim (USA v. Cuba), Award, 2 May 1929, II UNRIAA

913–918

xxiv table of cases


www.cambridge.org



TCW Group, Inc. and Dominican Energy Holdings, LP v. Dominican Republic,

UNCITRAL, Procedural Order N° 3, 16 December 2008

TECOGuatemala Holdings, LLC v.Republic of Guatemala, ICSIDCase NoARB/10/23,

Award, 19 December 2013

TECOGuatemala Holdings, LLC v.Republic of Guatemala, ICSIDCase NoARB/10/23,

Submission of the United States of America, 23 November 2012

Tokelés (Tokios) v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No ARB/02/18. Decision on Jurisdiction.

Dissenting Opinion Chairman Prosper Weil, 29 April 2004

Union Carbide Corp. Gas Plant Disaster, Re, 634 F. Supp. 842 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) United

Parcel Service of America Inc. v.Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, FirstMexican

1128 Submission, 11 June 2001

United Parcel Service of America v. Government of Canada. US Second 1128

Submission, 13 May 2002

United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. Government of Canada, Third US 1128

Submission, 23 August 2002

United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award

on Jurisdiction, 22 November 2002

Urbaser SA and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v.

Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/07/26. Final Award, 8 December 2016

Veteran Petroleum Ltd (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No AA

228, Final Award, 18 July 2014

Veteran Petroleum Ltd (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No AA

228. Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 November 2009

Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States [II], ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/00/3,

Final Award, 30 April 2004

Yukos Universal Ltd (Isle of Man) v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No AA 227, Final

Award, 18 July 2014

Yukos Universal Ltd (Isle of Man) v. Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No

AA 227 Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 November 2009

table of cases xxv


www.cambridge.org



TABLE OF TREATIES

Unless otherwise indicated, in addition to the sources indicated in this section, the text

of all international investment agreements cited in this book can be found in UNCTAD,

International Investment Agreements Navigator: http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad

.org/IIA

Bilateral Treaties

Acuerdo por Canje de Notas Interpretativo del Convenio entre la República Argentina

y la República de Panamá para la Promoción y Protección Recíproca de Inversiones

de 1996, 15 September 2004

Agreement between Japan and the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Concerning the Promotion and Protection of Investment, signed at Colombo 1

March 1982

Agreement between Japan and the Republic of the Philippines for an Economic

Partnership, signed at Helsinki 9 September 2006, entered into force 11 December

2008

Agreement on Cooperation and Facilitation of Investments between the Federative

Republic of Brazil and the Republic of Chile, signed at Santiago, 23 November 2015


Republic of Brazil and the Republic of Colombia, signed at Bogota 9 October 2015

75, 76, 77


Republic of Brazil and the United Mexican States, signed at Mexico City 26 May

2015

Agreement on Cooperation and Facilitation of Investments between the Government

of the Federative Republic of Brazil and the Government of the Republic of Angola,

signed at Luanda 1 April 2015

Agreement on Cooperation and Facilitation of Investments between the Government

of the Federative Republic of Brazil and the Government of the Republic of

Mozambique, signed at Maputo 30 March 2015

Agreement on Economic and Commercial Enlargement between the Federative

Republic of Brazil and the Republic of Peru, signed at Lima, 29 April 2016

xxvi


www.cambridge.org



Agreement on the Encouragement and Protection of Investments between the

Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic,

signed 8 October 2001, entered into force 11 May 2002

Free Trade Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Korea and the

Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, signed at Hanoi 5 May 2015,

entered into force 20 December 2015

Free Trade Agreement between the Republic of Singapore and the Republic of Panama,

signed at Singapore 1 March 2006, entered into force 24 July 2007

General Claims Commission, (Agreement 8 September 1923). (United Mexican States,

United States of America), IV UNRIAA 11–14

Investment Cooperation and Facilitation Agreement between the Federative Republic

of Brazil and the Republic of Malawi, signed at Brasilia 25 June 2015

Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement between Mauritius and the United

Arab Emirates, signed at Dubai 20 September 2015

Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement between the Government of the

Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Government of the Republic of Singapore,

signed at Singapore 4 November 2016

Mainland China and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement, signed at

Hong Kong 28 June 2017, entered into force 28 June 2017

Reciprocal Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement between the Government

of the Kingdom of Morocco and the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,

signed at Abuja, 3 December 2016

Segundo Acuerdo por canje de Notas Interpretativo del Convenio entre la República

Argentina y la República de Panamá para la Promoción y Protección Recíproca de

Inversiones de 1996, 19 October 2004

Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and Pakistan for the Promotion and

Protection of Investments, Bonn, 25 November 1959

Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the United States of America

and the Italian Republic. Signed at Rome, 2 February 1948

UnitedMexican States, United States of America, Convention of 19 November 1941, IV

UNRIAA 765–769

Regional Treaties

Agreement on Investment Among the Governments of the Hong Kong Special

Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China and the Member States of

the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, signed at Manila, 12 November 2017

ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement, signed at Cha-am 26 February 2009,

entered into force 24 February 2012

Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European

Union Trans-Pacific Partnership, signed on 30 October 2016

table of treaties xxvii


www.cambridge.org



Intra-MERCOSUR Cooperation and Facilitation Investment Protocol, signed in

Buenos Aires 7 April 2017

Pacific Alliance Additional Protocol, signed 10 February 2014, between Chile,

Colombia, Costa Rica and Peru

Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, signed on 4 February 2016, between Australia,

Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the

United States, and Vietnam

Treaty establishing the CommonMarket for Eastern and Southern Africa, 5 November

1993, 33 I.L.M. 1067

Multilateral Treaties

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 10 June

1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, T.I.A.S. No 6997, 330 U.N.T.S. 38

Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of

Other States 18 March 1965, 575 U.N.T.S. 159

Energy Charter Treaty, 17 December 1994, 2080 U.N.T.S. 95; 34 I.L.M. 360 (1995)

Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, 30 January

1975, 1438 U.N.T.S. 245; O.A.S.TS. No 42; 14 I.L.M. 336

North American Free Trade Agreement, 17 December 1992, 32 I.L.M. 289, 605

(1993)

Statute of the International Court of Justice, 26 June 1945, 3 Bevans 1179; 59 Stat. 1031;

T.S. 993; 39 A.J.I.L. Supp. 215 (1945)

Unified Agreement for the Investment of Arab Capital in the Arab States, 26 November

1980, (1988) 3 ICSID Rev. 191

United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State

Arbitration, 17 March 2015, 54 I.L.M. 747–57

United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, 1 U.N.T.S. XVI

Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, 24 April 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77, 596 U.N.T.S. 261

ViennaConventiononDiplomatic Relations, 18April 1961, 23U.S.T. 3227, 500U.N.T.S. 95

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331, 8 I.L.M. 679

Draft Instruments and Other Non-Binding Instruments

ILC, Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection, with Commentaries. Report of the

International Law Commission, 58th session (A/61/10) (2006) II Yearbook of

the International Law Commission 22–100

International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for

Internationally Wrongful Acts, November 2001, Supplement No 10 (A/56/10),

chp.IV.E.1

xxviii table of treaties


www.cambridge.org



OECD, ‘Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property’, International Legal

Materials, 2 (1963), 241–67

UNCITRAL, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 68/109, UNDOC. A/68/462

(16 December 2013)

United Nations General Assembly, ‘Resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962 –

“Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources”, UN Doc. A/RES/17/1803’ (1962)

United Nations General Assembly, ‘Resolution 3281 (XXIX) of 12 December 1974 –

“Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States”, UN Doc. A/RES/29/3281’ (1974)

table of treaties xxix


www.cambridge.org

Documents

Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47338-5 — The Return ... · strategy, negotiating or amending investment treaties with provisions that potentially give more control and greater