Upload
ayesha-rana
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Slides of california case
Citation preview
Slide 1
California credit life Insurance Presented byAyesha Rana Nabeel AhmadSadia Anwar Waqar Tariq
Introduction:
CCLI formed in Los Angeles in 1961
15 regional offices, 230 sales representatives and the sale force is about 1/3 female
Product line includes Insurance Retirement programs Commercial packages Related financial services
In 1994, CCLI decided to open an office in the south eastern area
South eastern region came into an reality in 2003
James Bradford selected as a area manager because of his interpersonal skills and sales performance
Problems:Absence of equal opportunities for women
Unjust distribution of bonuses and rewards
Ineffective performance evaluation
Excessive authority lies under the hand of area sales manager
No access to information for women
No acceptance of female representatives by male representatives
Sales representatives were quitting and moving towards competitors
Core problem:Inability of Sales Manager to fairly evaluate the performance of staff
Analysis:
Aspects of case:Claims of Reonldi is right or wrong?(i.e. James is unfair with Reonldi)
Is James doing sexual discrimination or not?(i.e. methods to evaluate sales people are fair or not)
Quota achievement Vs. increments:Renoldi is getting right increment so her claim is wrongRenoldi is being positively evaluated in 2009 with quota achievement of 98.5%Sales PersonTarget AchievedIncrementRenoldi98.5%5%Felica98.7%5.8%Kathy99%5.8%Cleff 98.1%2.7%
Evaluation system:Difference of performance between Renoldi and Cliff = 0.4%Salary Increment difference = 2.7%Target achievedDifference from targetRenoldi98.5%1.5Felica98.7%1.3Kathy99%1Cliff98.1%1.9
Other issues:
Problem is not sexual discrimination, problem is the unjust system
Employees morale is low due to dissatisfaction (e.g. Renoldi telling lie)
Manager has excessive authority to evaluate
Recommendations (cont.):James shouldn't be terminated but should be sent for training
Counseling of males and females can be used to mitigate the differences
Standard operating procedures should be made for evaluation of employees
There should be a regulatory body over sales manager to evaluate his performance of evaluation
Recommendations:There should be representative body for women to represent their concerns
There must be an open communication channel
There must be formal code of conduct to eliminate gender biasness
360 degree evaluation
Conclusion