Upload
alan-jordan
View
226
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Building Energy Awareness on
Conservation (Phase I & II )
BEACON
Background……
A pilot project in 30 elite schools in Delhi in 2003 – 2004
Project was as a tremendous success
Awarded by the Wuppertal Institute of Climate, Energy and Environment
Seeing the success BEE decided to implement the project in a few other states of the country
Implementation…..
Re ne wa b le So urc e s
No n-Re ne wa b le So urc e s
S olar
W at erWind
G e o the rm a l
Bio m a ss
N uc lear
Coal
N at ur al GasO il
Sensitization of parents and through them the community
Provide guidance to teachers in order to maximize excellence in energy education process
Enhance learning of the target group through maximum sensitisation on key energy issues that will impact their lives
Needs assessment of knowledge on energy conservation and existing local specific problems
Develop and disseminate resource material in local language for better understanding of the issue Formation of energy clubs Regular analysis
Focus Areas
Recommendations for energy curriculum
Capacity building of teachers
Involvement of students through events and competitions for awareness generation
Energy Star /Labelling
Target Group
Primary beneficiaries:100 government, public and private schools in the ratio 5:3:2 respectivelyMore than 3000 School students and 200 teachers
Secondary beneficiaries: More than 1,50,000 students with an average of 1,200 – 1,500 students per schoolMore than 7000 teachers with an average of 40 – 70 teachers per schoolAdministrative staff members, class IV employees of the school, parents and communities
Project Location
Delhi – Pilot project
North – Haryana (Rohtak) and Uttar Pradesh ( Lucknow)South –Tamil Nadu (Chennai) and Kerala (Thiruvananthapuram)West – Maharashtra (Pune) andMadhya Pradesh (Bhopal) East – West Bengal (Kolkatta) and Jharkhand (RanchiNortheast – Assam (Guwahati) and Meghalaya (Shillong)
Project Approach
Identification:SchoolsEnergy Designated Agencies Energy experts
Survey:•Questionnaires•Data collection •Analysis
Resource Material:Posters/stickers/bookmarkersRevise energy booklet
Translation into regional languages:•Energy booklet •Resource material
Dissemination: •Resource material •Energy booklet
Energy Clubs:•Setting up of clubs•Dovetailing energy activities in environment clubs
Project Approach
Mobilization of target groups
WorkshopsSensitization Workshops on energy issues Training workshops Group Discussion
ActivitiesCompetitions CampaignsStreet plays Exhibitions Energy audit
Post project evaluation
Media coverage
Knowledge level (before initiation)
Knowledge level of students' before project initiation (city-wise)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Cities
Per
cen
tag
e
Poor Below average Average Good Excellent
Poor 5 15 33 14 55 28 9 29 4 23
Below average 25 44 31 37 30 58 58 62 16 43
Average 44 26 18 37 15 13 29 9 45 29
Good 24 13 16 10 0 3 4 0 35 5
Excellent 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kolkata Ranchi Lucknow Roktak Guwahati Shillong Bhopal Pune Chennai Trivandrum
Knowledge level (after implementation)
Knowledge level of students after project implementation
01020304050607080
Cities
Perc
en
tag
e
Poor Below average Average Good Excellent
Feedback
Feedback on sensitization activities
1 4 1130
55
0 018
56 42
0204060
1- Poor 2 - Belowaverage
3- Average 4 - Good 5 - Excellent
Rating
Perc
enta
ge
Students Teachers
Feedback on workshops
0 520
36 38
0 020
41 39
0204060
1- Poor 2 - Belowaverage
3- Average 4 - Good 5 - Excellent
Rating
Perc
enta
ge
Students Teachers
Feedback
Feedback on concept building
1 5 15
42 37
0 1 6
5538
0204060
1- Poor 2 - Belowaverage
3- Average 4 - Good 5 - Excellent
Rating
Perc
enta
ge
Students Teachers
Feedback on resource material
3 618
35 38
0 1
18
4635
01020304050
1- Poor 2 - Belowaverage
3- Average 4 - Good 5 - Excellent
Rating
Perc
enta
ge
Students Teachers
Outcome
Five point rating scale
50% increase in knowledge School curriculum not
level of students in the sufficient for awareness states targeted generation
Requirement of varioustools with more teacher-
student involvement
Suggestions
More schools and children should be targeted for wider awareness generation.
More training programme for teachers are required.
Sessions should be conducted in individual schools so that more students can participate
Practical aspects should be focused
Findings of NPC
School Management – Program was successful. Schools had better knowledge, became more aware of various aspects of energy conservation and implementing the same
Teachers – Inputs provided were excellent in increasing the capacity of the teachers to impart knowledge to the students
Students – Considerable scope of development of knowledge in terms of energy efficiency, efficient devices, utilization, energy analysis and calculation
Parents – Relatively less knowledge of energy efficient devices and energy resources
Recommendations of NPC
Objectives achieved, so the program needs to continued with slight modificationsCoordinator and teacher for imparting knowledge should be from all department Resource material supplied by TERI should be properly maintained and displayed at prominent placesMinimum three teachers to be trained as Master TrainersWorkshops for parents to improve knowledge of merits and better understanding of energy efficient devices and techniquesLanguage should be understandable to students – preferably in local language
The road ahead……..
Work closely with State Designated Agencies and State Education BoardsMaster Trainers Training Capacity building initiatives for teachers, students and parentsCommunity outreachCreate a common pool of resources that can be used by anyone whenever required.All resource material in the local languageDisplay Resource material at prominent places…schools, market places, community centresSignature tune for the campaignRegular energy audit at school level/ home front Media intervention
Thank you