Broward County Solid Waste and Recycling Issues Study · 2017-10-13 · collect solid waste materials. The City of Lauderhill placed the collection of solid waste materials from residential

RESOLUTION NO. 11 R-03-38

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AWARD OF BID TO REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A ALL SERVICE REFUSE TO PROVIDE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL PURSUANT TO BID #2010-025; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE THE SPECIFIC TERMS OF THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE SUCH SERVICES; PROVIDING THAT THIS BID AWARD IS CONTINGENT UPON THE PARTIES REACHING MUTUAL AGREEMENT ON THE TERMS OF THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT AND UPON THE MUTUAL SETTLEMENT OF THE BID PROTEST; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER, CHARLES FARAND A)

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA:

Section 1. The bid from Republic Services of Florida, Limited partnership d/b/a All Service Refuse to provide solid waste collection services to the City of Lauderhill pursuant to Bid #1020-025 is hereby approved and awarded contingent upon the parties reaching mutual agreement on the terms of the Franchise Agreement and contingent upon the mutual settlement of the bid protest.

Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to negotiate the specific terms of the Franchise Agreement to provide such services, which will then be brought back to the City Commission for approval and is hereby authorized to negotiate the settlement of the bid protest.

Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

DATED this 11th day of _--'Ap=-r_i_l ______ , 2011.

PASSED AND ADOPTED on first reading this 11th day of April , 2011.

A. TTEST: Ll . A " .~ ~di le (IA • fiWll,UA.__

-tiCLERK

Resolution No. 11R-03-38 Page 1 of 2

MOTION SECOND

M. BATES H. BENSON H. BERGER K. THURSTON

R. KAPLAN

'Ib11rston .Sates

Yes Yes

Yes Yes Yes Yes

Resolution No. 11R-03-38 Page 2 of 2

~e?,Foµ W. Earl Hall City Attorney

CITY OF LAUDERHILL COMMISSION MEETING

Agenda Request

Indicate with an (x) this type of request: ORDINANCE

_x_RESOLUTION OTHER

Meeting Date: March 28, 2011

Request Action: (State the action requested of the Commission and why the action is necessary. What is the expected outcome of the action?)

The approval of the bid for the collection of solid waste services in the City of Lauderhill contingent upon the parties reaching mutual agreement on the terms of the Franchise Agreement as to the provision of all services.

Need: (Why is there a need for this action?)

The City has a current solid waste collection agreement with two (2) haulers for the collection of solid waste materials within the City of Lauderhill. These agreements expired at the end of 2010. This solid waste collection bid will choose one hauler to be responsible for the collection of solid waste materials for residential units and commercial facilities in the City of Lauderhill.

Summary Explanation/ Background: (Provide a summary/background of this agenda request)

The City of Lauderhill currently has agreements with two waste haulers for the collection of solid waste materials. Waste Management currently services all Lauderhill residents and businesses except those residents and businesses recently annexed into the City. The newly annexed neighborhoods are still covered by Broward County's solid waste collection agreement as was required by State law. The hauler in the newly annexed area is All Service Refuse. These agreements provide that All Service is the exclusive hauler for residential customers. However, there is a non-exclusive agreement for the businesses in the annexed areas and they are permitted to privately contract with any hauler to collect solid waste materials.

The City of Lauderhill placed the collection of solid waste materials from residential units and commercial facilities out to bid on September 19, 2010 as Solid Waste Collection Services Bid Number P2010-025. The bid closed on November 04, 2010. The City received bids from five waste haulers. Two haulers, Southern Waste Systems and Choice submitted two bids: an original and alternate bid. Southern Waste Systems Alternate bid was not ranked because it was incomplete. The alternate bid for Choice was not ranked because the City Attorney advised the City is contracted through an interlocal agreement with Broward County to take its waste to the County's facility until

(This agenda request is to be displayed with the Agenda announcement on the City's website)

CITY OF LAUDERHILL COMMISSION MEETING

Agenda Request

2013. The ranking committee met on December 9, 2010 and ranked the original bids from all the waste haulers. The hauler that was selected was Republic Services of Florida, Limited Partnership d/b/a All Service Refuse to be responsible for the solid waste collection services citywide.

Attachments: (Number all attachments consecutively)

1- Evaluation Results 2- Ranking Sheets 3- Solid Waste Pricing Grids 4- Financial Analysis 5- Agreements between Broward County and the City of Lauderhill

Cost Summary/ Fiscal Impact: (Include projected cost, approved budget amount and account number, source of funds, and any future funding requirements)

These are revenue funds that the City will receive in our Franchise Revenue accounts.

Recommended By:

x Software required, please download

fromhttp://www.arx.ccm

Approved By:

Approved By:

(Department Director)

(Finance Director)

(City Manager)

(This agenda request is to be displayed with the Agenda announcement on the City's website)

BID 2010-025 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE

Name of Firm A\\ ~.~:.y\) ,c..e.S

Date / ?,., /o/ } l D

BID EVALUATION

Evaluator lby·C-1{ V1. :)o rkV"' Print Name

Category

Ability of Bidder to meet published specifications

Bidders qualifications and capability

Local Preference as defined by Lauderhill Ordinance

Minority certified business

Bidders experience and references

Cost to complete project as specified in documents

Total points awarded

'

Maximum Points Per Category

IO

20

5

5

20

40

Awarded Points Per Category

\0

\~

b

r/ '20

3·+

100 Cf_b I_./

~cb?~1'( 'ou.,.,Al~-otyp 4e;..- h.dK,b .. d- cok ogg_\~s \ewe_ S'e§a

i h-ee-·!s t0'he.ve.. AJ\ ~cl\ ~e,S 2 i «\c 4£ Som~ W) ... \i.-lYJl.\~ £ i\eS

Ci~ '10+- o ~er.> .. 1\,,'1< °}-,ve-s resJ~±5 wi:.x:-eJ. 0te~s t:ll~ \\o w \o M I h S fu.o \l ~~ Xv.+- 0 u.r\ ..

I,-/


BID EVALUATION

Name of Firm_--'--A'---'-\_\ _5--"'='e_'--r-'-V---'l c=--· e.-=----'·K_e__,_f-=u_,,,sm<;._· e.,-=--Date __ I ~--'1'---'q'--'-)-=-=·\ O:::__ __ _

Evaluator i- LAV" l ·e_en £ V Ct VI $ ----"----'-------'----------Print Name

Category









10

20

5

5

20

40


l

\1 s 0 IA t.to

100 91

Evaluator Signature __ .._£"'--"· .,___· -~......:..._l!vy1___,,"--.:__>.,..c_Q_,,,£._ ______ _

Comments: c__ \ +-~ D f: D0t\l f_Vl po r..\-· \, Q d. so Me, rectV\+ ISS1A :e ~ 1611th j},,e., 0 D~f"l.Yl,k). Locn. I pr-efevex1c:e -751 l\fv'1 3\ Ave. LuudtY-h1ll )oca-t,on ·

b t d ni) t . l1 om p \t'te. i he... -fu IJo iV 1 V\j do (l...y WJt n+s '. o.f.ftvors c.._--evt\..+\(\Cl+10.ri E ~x h1\')1+~ L)Y Wc1rrcwih"'(S


BID EVALUATION

NameofFinn All Se(v~C~ ~-----'------=--------~-

Date _~l 1-_....__\ '1-'-+l_lO __ _ Evaluator_S-=_e.A_" _n_-'-tj_.'_-e,._rJ---',_·e.._~...;;;S::;..u_· _n _______ _

Print Name

Category







Total oints awarded


10

20

5

5

20

40

100


lO

l<e 6 0.

----------Evaluator Signature._,_..,,:.:o.....!~--1--1----------------


BID EVALUATION

Name of Firm /\IJ. ~Vt <:.e- e.e.~~e - f2.ef u.b.1; c. Ser v I c.e

Date 1 ·2 / 9 /- I 0 •

Evaluator ___ J~'--.M_._~ __ · _------------Print Name

Category




Minority certified business ·····---· - --...

-Bidders experience and references



Comments:1 ;r fu &_ ~ol

.,.. --···--


10

20

5

5

20

40

100


-·--

B

10

'S 0

20

40

~g

Z l¥ of ~ t uJO..Ate_ <;;~ f'e-z-~ l. c:.. \-\ ve_ / 7.-

e- ~ ~(..t fC-4?- ·, µ6)(~ ol ~ t\ ~.et<..~~ loo~~ t+~~ 6;,..o.1.s\- k "" 00()~11.~('. ,-rt"-~' co~p~

=~d r:;~ ,:~ :~ ~~r--~ <>1-.f ~ 4 +{,.. f 1oQJ.;.-tA.aJLi-}: -3


BID EVALUATION

Name of Firm L3ou~ein ~~ \L./q/to Date

t I

Evaluator JM, 6£{)a Print Name

Category




Minority certified business -··· -----·-- - - -·- -- ----------- .. ------- . - - ... -· .. --··




S~d-ern

- -- . -


- --- - - ---- -

10

20

5

5

20

40

100

l ( c


----·- - -· ··-

10

1·~

0 0

------·

1~

~

gl}

Evaluator Signature __ --+-<)J!li-~__,___, _ Comments: l '}- ero eo~ lt\L!~~ quel-e JoLtwcJz. ~f~t

No ~le.. e>ri °1~~0~1c aft-~ n~clt~a4J.e .. ct ..... z.

~ {L~fee,J) l :.t f~ t\.tlAAC--: ~(kl

z. .+ <;__.< ""': ~ e.)l\f eI'\e<A=- ,4 al eo of t ~ ci '¥- ~ 2

2!' ~ z.od ]=<'\C?-- i<'lcl


BID EVALUATION

NameofFirm OW S Date ) 2} q I ( 0 Evaluator SeCVJ \="\€V\Je rs-on

Print Name

Category




Minority certified business --· --- - . -

-· - --·- ... - -· - ··-· ·-·· -





- ..

IO

20

5

5


IU

l(o 0 Q ___

..

20 iq 40 ~3

100 71.>


BID EVALUATION

Name of Finn So Lft~e \"'\'\ LJ os·te., Date __ i d-_...;.l____,9_._.h'-=o'---------Evaluator LUY- \e-e n E \J 0 Vl S ------------------

Print Name

Maximum A warded Category Points Per Points Per

Category Category

Ability of Bidder to meet published specifications IO II J

Bidders qualifications and capability 20 IC\

Local Preference as defined by Lauderhill Ordinance 5 0 Minority certified business 5 ··- 0 -----··. -···· ----- . -

.. - ·--·· - ·--- - ···-- -- -

Bidders experience and references 20 11 Cost to complete project as specified in documents 40 .3 9

·-· -

Total points awarded 100 ~ ,.---h

Evaluator Signature_.._cl_-'--· 1---~...__"--'Gvf\P=---"''---=------------Comments: C .. (Jo+v-tAe, te_d w \-\\!\ \'Y)Uf b svna\kc (Ylun1t1po h+1eS th QD LM<i er h1 \I. CDY\'lpar>~ 10 1y:-s. {J Id . HouY-S for ±r-ush P'e '('--up hO ± inc lud 't? d , C us+ D roe I"" -Sf r v 1 l° e ho\AvS l\ r-e_ l~<S ~ -than D±he r: b \ ck\ f 'L (',. 7 ?\ m -- [o p tYl / M -F t S 9 ± · 7 4 tt? ~ I P W7


BID EVALUATION

Name of Finn ~ov\\iQcrJ'\.PC\S\€- ~'lS~Vl-1 LL c..

Date \t.- l t!f I t 0

Evaluator 'Dcayy:( \ W · -::Jc::>---~---Print Name

Category




Minority certified business --. ----- --- -• --M--•- ' ··--· - -





Evaluator Signa44tf7 . ·. Comments: A-/I r:e-/?wef}CceS Cem'2- bJ<.cft ti~ SodJ ~£d.

IO

20

5

5


s= 15-

~ d - --- ---·-

20 )J-

40 35

100 7,f / ,_/


BID EVALUATION

Name of Firm /Ala 2 /e. t?t.rtRtak"mgir

Date 12 lez /10

Evaluator tJ c.s..,,,rl \ ,,,) "1 ~ £~..-== Print Name

Category









IO

20

5

5

20

40


g -

\5/

r!

-(/

~b

Js=

100 <{I

EvaluatorSign~~~-JZ---- ./

Comments: {Qq;f-e J1taM~eaf:4-.?.l\e,a.1 llvi Aoe ·2 g._ ')o,,,,J Jab w:-\-V\ v-c::=.'}u\cv'

C.al\ec.-h~a t.A r')l:\A); ~ \> ... 1 'rL - \>~t: 4-p. 1\.-e (.,yY\?L~ .. ·, nJ: +k.\: c?k

?-f"C....c..c:.VV\e..,d; re...'"-e,y~s D '(\ ~e..W\ c .... n: Cr,, 5""('""b'y= \-t,o...+- ~e.+s \:J\o,.un '

0 Y ~ j( O f 1'eJ "Q_ \--L Q..- -\:-no er<. ?\ r-J .C, Y DC (~ ,.._. <; 1. Y\ c... I 5 .\-« \ Q , ~Lr , :(\ $.,. C< 3

~\--r-e e.-\-S w\...-e.-yQ ~Y'-"C..}t.4) le"-\\ t\,~1d ~ /\-\ $0 ty (pr'Vl'l"\€,.6&;<.(

\> yo Y&k-, ~.:::, '.\\ €.-:\ StiMe1' yv-p..> ? , c. K '="' t> -..\vz:? ~l '< ..


BID EVALUATION

NameofFinn !ila_s1=e.. Mcin~5t1Y1en± Date _bl__._(q..__.\......._l D"'------

Evaluator _ __._b--=U-'--Y-_,_\ e_.=........e ..__n.....__._E-=-----v .-....6\._.__0-:...S--""-___ _ Print Name

Category



Loca1 Preference as defined by Lauderhill Ordinance

Minority certified business --- - -- - - ··-·--·· - ·----



- ··---·.

IO

20

5

5

20


-lU

\b 0 0 d.0

. ·-

Cost to complete project as specified in documents 40 3S

Total points awarded 100 93

Evaluator Signature __ cl: __ · -·-~=---'--~-~ ...::___..o:;._.;.._ __ ·· _____ _

comments: £vex' +ho~b jb:-- COmp!:mj IS Clir«uJ:li Sex vie 11 LQuclt:r-bi \\ 1 1± did no+ pr-ond-e.. °'-' ,sc..o~e. · f s e. < v \ ees.


BID EVALUATION

NameofFirm $\IQ~ Ma."-a.<jeY"Y\~/\,+ Date ) L l C( I ro Evaluator b~ u~d;e("S"on

Print Name

Category







Total oints awarded


10

20

5

5

20

40


lO

l0 0

100


BID EVALUATION

Date \ 2 / q J ( 0

Evalu-at_o_r~::~_1f-d~+-·~.-j~~:~-------~~~~-~~-~----------Print Name

Category




Minority certified business ·- -- . -· . -

- --- ·----· .. ... _.,. -------···




Maximum Awarded Points Per Category

- ---· ·-

10

20

5

5

20

40

100

Points Per Category

~

ri

'D

D - -----·- ........

2o

3" Qt


BID EVALUATION

Category









10

20

5

5

20

40

100


\0

\S-

15'

rJ

-) ;'>

J8_

g~ / / -

Evaluator Signa~ f<= . Comments: ?r=~W\tA...-i \'::{ bJ,\&\_ ycc..'{¢.\'2... .. 5,Y1"0e.. ~mi\:\ yesile.,.d-,G<.(

c"' 1 \'l- Col\ .,J.~a i., in {P (1 Plec.+ Q·, M,, c \tio e±g.- 1 y <:., w & J._;i'\WIC.."' . \J \et\.se.- ~ e e. o._,\-~f\:\e.J.-J 1

§ 14-22 LAUDERHILL CODE

therefrom is plainly audible across the real property boundary of the source; provided, however, that this shall not apply to any public performance, gathering or parade for which a permit has been obtained from the city.

b. The use or operation in any place or on any premises in the city, any radio, television or other mechanical musical instrument or device of any kind whereby the sounds therefrom are cast directly upon public streets operated for advertising purposes or for the purpose of attracting the passing public or which are so placed and operated that sounds coming therefrom can be heard to the annoyance and inconvenience of travelers upon any street or public place or of persons in neighboring premises; provided, however, that between the hours from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., such radios or other mechanical musical instruments or devices may be maintained or operated in such a manner that the sounds therefrom may be heard not more than a distance of three hundred (300) feet therefrom.

(5) The creation of a loud iuidlor excessive noise in connection 'with ~e loading, unloa~~,"~~~~~ ?~. ,~ther handling of boxes, crates, . . , r8fi:i.Se·~;o:uoors, O~O~~ obi~:or;iJ! CQD.ll,~~~>I(Wit.Ji'the use Or operation of·~!,fitF!~~~~o~bn"' oo~eicial1p~peify·~een tlie1noUJ:s: .. m: ~=QQ:Jl .. ~;~·and 8:00 a;Jn: weekdays, and at an tllne$ on week.ends ·anQ:lloliQA~!Where,com.mereiilt'prop-

. erty abiitS res:frleiitial property: . .

(6) The use of commercial maintenance equipment which creates a loud and/or excessive noise in connection with the operation of said equipment within a commercial area wi~ one hundred (100) fe~ _resi~~~j~t€i·l'lQ~~.~sens1tive area between 6:00 p~«ittJtl':r.lf. ~s sip 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 a.,m. we~erid~ aiid holidays. ·'

(7) . Tb.El ke.pmg·M"anj animal, bird,. or fowl whic;h by causing fitequent or continamg ~aliie w'l:dcll;'~lis·th~(comf()tt or repose of any per86n iri the vicln:ity.

Sup.p. No. 84 922


BID EVALUATION

Name of Firm_· _ ____...\ ~JJ ........ as~·+.._,,,e..""'--'P..1--......:--r o~---Date _/_~--=-) C\_.__}~ID=--------Evaluator. _ _._b-'-U.=...!--Y"_\_·e_e_h_E_-_V_Q_n_s_· _____ _

Print Name

Category









10

20

5

5

20

40


IU

iB 0

0 l~

3lo

100 g~

~. c ,. /1\. AA 1:' .~ Evaluator Signature __ -"'~'---'1---{/V=----=--~--=::___-=!iio.,_J...._ ______ _


BID EVALUATION

NameofFirm WQ s-te_ Yra Date ) L l q l ( 0 Evaluator Se~ H ~ers o~

Print Name

Category


Bidders ·qualifications and capability





Total oints awarded


10

20

5


5 - --

20

40

100

l l


BID EVALUATION

Name of Finn.___,,W<--.::...:::;_;tW:..=...;·ie=-=·, _~_ID __ o!-'---f--=(o_r ~_Ja_ Date \ '2 ( q / \ 0 ___ __.__+,-.~,'----~ Evaluator ____ J-+. _._rn __ . _ea.kcz __ ; _________ _

:.J Print Name

Maximum Awarded Category Points Per Points Per

Category Category

Ability of Bidder to meet published specifications 10

Bidders qualifications and capability 20 ~~ 1 f'

Local Preference as defined by Lauderhill Ordinance 5 D

~ --- D -- --· ... -Minority certified business

Bidders experience and references 20 'ZO

Cost to complete project as specified in documents 40 32 z..

Total oints awarded 100

Evaluator Signature __ --lJ9~!1!A~~~.'f _ Comments: \ ~ Q..e~ f-<'~ axo0 oJ ~1.U~J ( l-fv \Ii ~J

s-t ~ Feb- ocq

-2

-8


BID EVALUATION

Name of FinnC .. bo; c.J:!- E Yl\), ~1Df1 y'\je..()\: Sevv '- c.R. .S -i:vr;:.

Date 12 { t.f l \0

Evaluator ]:) c.>.y'l"'1\ W · jp~c-tVl Print Name

Category






Cost to complete project as specified in docwnents



10

20

5

5

20

40


s-I.I

ti (j;

IS-

33

100 "~

Evaluator Sign~~-&/____..~~--_·--·-_____ _

Comments: LE e Cou n\-'j ~ '[he. J:.ttu'}!:JJ. h~C? J, d 171 d C!Ja Smod!z 11, v: Q \: e_V\Ov¥ e Qu..,?Vbe<n \ 0 )") '$ ,· .\-e_, O\t2 'Xvore.d,'"\ y.\: ~e,

\o 'o 6,.oe.

• _.....1r·


BID EVALUATION

Name of Firm ___ L.....;=-._,_b_._o=·· _l-==C_==-=_ e_,=----------

Date __ l_9--_,_/ g-'--'-'\ l=---0 ___ _

Evaluator J_ U ·r \e_e_ h EV C{ )'l .S ~-~-'--'---------'~-----------~

Print Name

Maximum Awarded Category Points Per Points Per

Category Category

Ability of Bidder to meet published specifications 10 y

Bidders qualifications and capability 20 (~

Local Preference as defined by Lauderhill Ordinance 5 0 Minority certified business 5 D ... ,_

··- ... - . ·-· ---·----·· ·---·--.

Bidders experience and references 20 1e> Cost to complete project as specified in documents 40 31

Total points awarded 100 go

Evaluator Signature ____ cf. __ · __;:;_U __ Q/lllD _____ . ____ _


BID EVALUATION

NameofFirm Q1'C) ~··. (_ Q

Date l'L_ f 9 l ( D. . Evaluator . SeCL.'\ 1-\~d-e.rs<Jt"\

Print Name

Category







Total oints awarded


IO

20

5

5

20

40

100


10 0

Co\


BID EVALUATION

Name of Finn ~L-cQ_ b1v1-ro0menf-uf Date ___ l 2_.,.__Lg-L-4--/ ....__( 0

, I I Ca._.0_ Evaluator d . M ,

~~~--+-~~~~~~P-rin_t_N_am~e~~~~~

Maximum Awarded Category




Minority certified business .... ---·-· - . -

. - ·-- . ·-



. ---·--- .

Points Per Category

IO

20

5

5

20

40

Points Per Category

...... ',,

a \& {)

0 ·····-· - - ·-

\2

34-Total points awarded 100 7i;

-

Comments:'* ~ of f<D~{ &;d riJ incLu&e_ MJ.e+~.___ \( 2. )4;" R.a..t.\ ~& ~ K-t \:c. (\d:L-4~ - 4

\

~ if' ~e,t,LJ?- tn~ed no~~ ~r-~---~ - L

4 ~ ~~d( lS'~ \J,,\ce_ Qr iJ. -[,,;

•• . .. Lauderhlll I ~~~!r]tt~~ D Current Rates "f:).]:l.~ .. ~·.~~·.~.·_,.t-£",:'~'·:C:,~l:'

Collection 7.03 4.74 Disposal 9.87 9.88 Rate 16.9 5 3 $ 14.62 6 2

96 Gallon 64.73 2 s i~EtJi;J~~l!~~,! s 1 $ 5$.00 2 2

Collection 48.85 54.13 Disposal 45.64 27.92 Rate $ 94.49 1 4 5 $ 82.05 3 2


Collection 97.70 90.93 Disposal 91.29 55.84 Rate $ 188.99 1 5 $ 146.77 3 2


Collection 195.40 129.90 Disposal 182.62 111.68 Rate $ 378.02 2 5 6 4 $ 241.58 3 1


Collection 293.13 201.67 Disposal 200.75 83.76 Rate $ 493.88 1 4 $ 285.43 3 2


Collection 586.21

s l!fi1ft~• 5

358.85 Disposal 401.49 167.52 Rate $ 987.70 2 4 $ 526.37 3

. '

Disposal Rate

Collection Disposal Rate









Collection Disposal

$

$

$

$

$

$

p

$

$

$

$

Lauderhill Current Rates

48.85 57.91

106.76

73.26 86.88

160.14

97.70 115.83 213.53

146.55 173.77 320.32

195.40 231.71 421.11

195.40 182.92 378.32

293.13 274.36 567.49

390.81 365.83 758.64

586.21 548.73

1,134.94

-

2

2

2

3

3

3

3

2

3

3

5

3

4

4

4

6

1

1

1

1.~1tn~1~111

c::J 422.18 223.36

6 $ fUS.54 3

54.13 33.50

5 $ 87.63 4

74.69 .50.26

5 $ 124.95 3

90.93 67.01

5 $ 157.94 2

110.42 100.51

5 $ 210.93 2

129.90 134.02

5 $ 283.92 2

124.49 . 55.84

5 $ 180.33 4

201.67 83.76

5 $ 285.43 4

250.06 111.68

5 $ 361.14 4

358.85 167.52

5 $ 526.31 4

422.18 223.36

1

2

3

2

2

Rate



Haul Charge Disposal Charge Franchise Fee Haul Rate Per Pull Rate

Haul Charge Disposal Charge Franchise Fee Haul Rate Per Pull Rate

$

$

$

$

$

Lauderhill Current Rates

39.04 7.53

46.57

62.99 15.05 78.04

203.25

30.50

233.75

237.98

35.70

273.68

4

1

1

1 6

1 6 n'i':..'";·1 ·;-~,.}~~_p;,,.:~·t

·::<;~.'.?h·.::.~,J~~~:~:r~:_,,_\~~ r~1~t{i~~n~~!

Residential Ranking Commercial Ranking

Total Ranking Local Preference (Resolution #20100-05-130)

Weighted Average Mythology 1 Residential Collection is 50% of total residential scoring

2.86 1.80 2.29 3.29

2.63 2.39 0.12

2.63 2.27

2 1

2 Dumpster service is assigned 4.55% each for a total of 45.50 of the total residential score 3 Can replacement is assigned 4.55% of total residential score 4 Residential scores are assigned a weighted average of 60% of total ranking 5 Commercial scores are assigned a weighted average of 40% of taltal ranking

Assumptions 1 Based on the fact that the current Inter-local agreement with the resource recovery board

does not expire until July 2, 2013, we are of the opinion that it would not be feasible to consider any alternate method of disposal.

3.34 5.57

4.23

4.23

5

c::J 6 $ 645.54 3 2

37.50 5.39

6 2 $ 42.89 3 3

62.00 10.71

2 $ n;:;:; 3 3

170.00 -

30.60 -

5 4 $ 200:iO 2 2

170.00

30.60 -

5 $ 2iifiij 2 2

3.00

2.55 3.73 4.57 3.00

3.36 3.44

3.36 3.44

Does not meet bid 3 4 requirements

City of Lauderhill

Financial Analysis

11/15/2010

Company Year

Bali!n~i: ~!!e1:t ~ymmi!!'.ll Cash & Cash Equivalents

Current Assets

Plant Property & Equipment

Goodwill

Other Assets Total Assets

Current Liabilities

Other Liabilities

Total liabilities

Owner's Equity

Liabilities and Owners Equity

Current Debt

long-Term Debt

Total Debt

ln!;Qm1: Stat1:m1:nt Summi!!'.ll Gross Revenue

Income from Operation

Net Income

Financial RatiQs Debt Ratio

(Total debt/Total Assets)

Debt-to-Equity

(Total debt/Shareholder's Equity)

Long-Term debt to Equity

{Long Term debt/Shareholder's Equity)

Profit Margin

(Net Income/Revenue)

Working Capital (deficit)

(Current Assets - Current liabilities)

Current Ratio

(Current Assets/Current Liabilities

Quick Ratio

(Cash & Cash Equivalents/Current Liabilities

Average Score

Waste

Management 2009

1,140,000,000

3,010,000,000

11,541,000,000

5,632,000,000

971,000,000

21,154,000,000

2,901,000,000

11,662,000,000

14,563,000,000

6,591,000,000

21,154,000,000

749,000,000

8,124,000,000

8,873,000,000

11,791,000,000

1,887,000,000

994,000,000

41.94%

134.62%

123.26%

8.43%

109,000,000

1.04

0.39

Waste

Management

2.43

Rank 4

4

4

2

1

1

1

All Service 2009

48,000,000

1,264,900,000

6,657,700,000

10,667,100,000

950,600,000

19,540,300,000

2,548, 700,000

9,424,500,000

11,973,200,000

7,567,100,000

19,540,300,000

543,000,000

6,419,600,000

6,962,600,000

8,199,100,000

1,589,800,000

495,000,000

35.63%

92.01%

84.84%

6.04%

{1,283,800,000)

0,50

0.02

All Service

3.14

Rank 2

2

2

3

5

4

4

Choice 2009

74,634

4,907,880

17,132,628

13,475,314

3,945,273

39,461,095

19,241,002

14,725,851

33,966,853

5,494,242

39,461,095

16,272,015

14,173,531

30,445,546

37,533,524

4,025,428

2,165,498

77.15%

554.14%

257.97%

5.77%

114,333,122)

0.26

0,00

Choice

4.71

Rank 5

s

5

4

4

5

5

sws 2009

909,648

10,621,747

52,648,170

9,011,262

11,981,350

84,262,529

14,094,613

20,435,005

34,529,618

49,732,911

84,262,529

8,246,233

20,435,005

28,681,238

63,996,424

9,281,516

6,930,847

34.04%

57.67%

41.09%

10.83%

(3,472,856;

0.75

0.06

sws

1.57

Rank 1

1

1

1

2

3

2

Waste Pro

2,331,313

33,065,787

173,214,414

28,368,082

4,154,470

238,802, 753

41,539,592

106,881,157

148,420, 749

90,382,004

238,802, 753

9,752,324

79,105,689

88,858,013

226,163,887

27,204,157

3,409,415

Rank 37.21% 3

98.31% 3

87.52% 3

1.51% 5

(8,473,805) 3

0.80 2

0.06 2

Waste Pro

3.00 I

Richard J. Kaplan. Esq. M;1vor

DaJe V. C. Holness \!ice tvt1~«x

M. Margaref Bates

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

NOTICE

NOTICE IS lrl!EREBY Gl:VEN that the CITY OIF ILAUDiEIRIHilLL is seeking seafed Bids from qualified participants for the foldbwing; work as specified:

SOUID WASTE COLLECTIOfN: SERVICES BHD NtJMBER JP2010-025

C:)ffll''::ssicwier This bid is for the Contractor or, Bidder, to provide solid waste colfection services f:or

H d·J 8 . J Ea§·· proximately 68,000 residents for the City o.f LauderhiH, in accordiaince with the terms, aywar . enson, r., ct,... ""d'4,' d f . t . d . th' B'd T11.. 11..·...11 . • ,,, r..- 11>~..JI

C>:~·nr::,i&sinii:"r "" 11 ldon.s, an scope o · services con ame • in ·IS 1 . ~ue 1111llw pir~ce m~~ ~· v·a111ft.11

· ifoir ai min~mwm of OJrn llluooired e~ghfy ~18@} days from tlhle datte of the B&D opening. Howard Berger

Charles Foronda City ivJ::111.:1ue:·

Andrea Anderson CityClnri\

Earl HaJI, Esq. City .i\ttC.l!1 li''Y

The City of LauderhW will be accepting. sealed Bids until 2:45 P.M. EST. on October 21. 2010. in the City Clerks Office, 5581 West Oakland Bourevard, Suite 421, Lauderh~H. Florida 33313 and will be opened at 3:00 P.M. in Room 401. Bids received after 2:45 P.M. will not be considered, and wil'I be returned to the bidder unopened. Al!il oiriginaR and tMrteell1l (113) lbo11.mi£1J copies amd one f1) ellecflro-nic copy of the bid must be submitted in a sealed envelope bearing the words: "BID 1?2010-025: SOUD WASTE COllECnON SEIRV~CES," E-maJled and faxed bids will not be accepted.

A Non-MamJ.latory pre-bid meetinfJ} will be held on Tuesday Ocftolberr 5, :w1«:» ai 2:00 1Pm in Conference Room 301, ILauderhiH City HaH, and 5581 West Oakland BouJevard, Lauderhill, Florida 33313.

Alf bidders must register with the City online. The direct link is: .~2! tp: f_1:~·1v-~~J_:_;a~s~~~i ;)-_-fl~ 2o~J 11_:~er10·~~~-=}~~~~-

Bid security in the form of a Bid Bond or certified check made payable to the "City of LauderhiW', in an amount eqtlal to five percent (5%) of the bid, will be required.

The Public Entity Crimes Affidavtt must be completed tn its entirety and submitted as part of the bid.

Bid Documents may be examined and obita~ned on arndl afltell" 09120/110, at the Purchasing Department, 5581 West Oakland Park Blvd., Lauderhill, Florida 33313 (954) 730-3044. Responsible questi.ons regarding this bid may be directed to the Purchasing Manager, Mrs. Gwen Jones at pjcn;=-:s(q,:1§..l:Jd~LhiU:JLg __ Q\:

The City Commission of the City of Lauderhill reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive any and all' informaMies or irregularities and to accept or reject all or any part of any bid as they may deem to be in the interest of the citizens of the City of Lauderhill. "The winning proposer is required to enter into a con.tract with the City of Lauderhill."

elT~~F0F LAUDEft8tLL f , .. ·~~< .... · .. -..-:,,~:~J~~:"i: ·~:·.:· ..... _// ./.:.--<~: .. .,_'

·· -Gwendotyn' ,J6nes Purchasing Manager

5581 W. Oakland Park Boulevard, Lauderhill, FL 33313 o www.lauderhill-fl.gov o PH: 954-730-3030 o FAX: 954-730-4227

SeptembeJi 17, 2010-

Via E-Mail

§lUN §JEN'lfllNJElL 333 S.W. 12 Avenue Deerfield Beach, FL 3 3442

ATTN: Legal Department

Dear Sir or Madam:

Please advertise as Legal/In Column, the attached BID P2010 - 025 for "§(())JLJJD W AS1r1E COILJLJEC'fJJON §JERVIlCJE§ 9'I

151 Advertisement 2"d Advertisement

Sunday, September 19, 2010 Friday, September 24, 2010