44
A (Very) Brief Introduction to Epistemology Lecture 1 Palash Sarkar Applied Statistics Unit Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata India [email protected] Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 1 / 16

Brief Introduction to Epistemology

  • Upload
    riomj

  • View
    18

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Epistemology (meaning "knowledge, understanding) is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge and is also referred to as "theory of knowledge". It questions what knowledge is and how it can be acquired, and the extent to which knowledge pertinent to any given subject or entity can be acquired. Much of the debate in this field has focused on the philosophical analysis of the nature of knowledge and how it relates to connected notions such as truth, belief, and justification. The term "epistemology" was introduced by the Scottish philosopher James Frederick Ferrier (1808–1864).

Citation preview

Page 1: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

A (Very) Brief Introduction to EpistemologyLecture 1

Palash Sarkar

Applied Statistics UnitIndian Statistical Institute, Kolkata

[email protected]

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 1 / 16

Page 2: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Epistemology: What and Why?

What is Epistemology?

Greek origin: theory of knowledge.Basic questions:

What is knowledge?What are the processes of acquiring knowledge?Other related questions.

Why will we discuss epistemology?

We have discussed science and scientific knowledge. So, it mightbe a good idea to take a look at what people have generallythought about knowledge.

Roots of several thoughts regarding philosophy of science can befound in the more general approaches to epistemology.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 2 / 16

Page 3: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Epistemology: What and Why?

What is Epistemology?

Greek origin: theory of knowledge.Basic questions:

What is knowledge?What are the processes of acquiring knowledge?Other related questions.

Why will we discuss epistemology?

We have discussed science and scientific knowledge. So, it mightbe a good idea to take a look at what people have generallythought about knowledge.

Roots of several thoughts regarding philosophy of science can befound in the more general approaches to epistemology.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 2 / 16

Page 4: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Epistemology: What and Why?

What is Epistemology?

Greek origin: theory of knowledge.Basic questions:

What is knowledge?What are the processes of acquiring knowledge?Other related questions.

Why will we discuss epistemology?

We have discussed science and scientific knowledge. So, it mightbe a good idea to take a look at what people have generallythought about knowledge.

Roots of several thoughts regarding philosophy of science can befound in the more general approaches to epistemology.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 2 / 16

Page 5: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Plato

Among the greatest of the Western philosophers of all times.

Born around 482-7 B.C.

We will briefly consider the following aspects.

The dialectical method of Socrates.

Knowledge and perception.

Theory of ideas.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 3 / 16

Page 6: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Plato

Among the greatest of the Western philosophers of all times.

Born around 482-7 B.C.

We will briefly consider the following aspects.

The dialectical method of Socrates.

Knowledge and perception.

Theory of ideas.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 3 / 16

Page 7: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

The Dialectical Method

Based on a dialogue between two or more people who may holddiffering views, yet wish to seek the truth of the matter through theexchange of their viewpoints while applying reason.Related methods.

Debate: both sides are committed to their viewpoints and a jury isrequired to pronounce the outcome.Rhetoric: communication designed to persuade an audience to sidewith a particular argument or action.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 4 / 16

Page 8: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

The Dialectical Method

Based on a dialogue between two or more people who may holddiffering views, yet wish to seek the truth of the matter through theexchange of their viewpoints while applying reason.Related methods.

Debate: both sides are committed to their viewpoints and a jury isrequired to pronounce the outcome.Rhetoric: communication designed to persuade an audience to sidewith a particular argument or action.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 4 / 16

Page 9: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

The Dialectical Method (Contd.)

Socrates favoured “truth” as the highest value.It can be discovered through reason and logic in discussion.This leads to the dialectical method.

Socrates valued rationality, i.e. logical appeal, above emotionalappeal, as the proper means for persuasion, discovery of truth,and as the determinant of action.

Each person should seek truth above all to guide his life.

Socrates opposed the teaching of rhetoric as artistic, emotionaloratory that did not require logic or proof.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 5 / 16

Page 10: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

The Dialectical Method (Contd.)

Socrates favoured “truth” as the highest value.It can be discovered through reason and logic in discussion.This leads to the dialectical method.

Socrates valued rationality, i.e. logical appeal, above emotionalappeal, as the proper means for persuasion, discovery of truth,and as the determinant of action.

Each person should seek truth above all to guide his life.

Socrates opposed the teaching of rhetoric as artistic, emotionaloratory that did not require logic or proof.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 5 / 16

Page 11: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

The Dialectical Method (Contd.)

Socrates favoured “truth” as the highest value.It can be discovered through reason and logic in discussion.This leads to the dialectical method.

Socrates valued rationality, i.e. logical appeal, above emotionalappeal, as the proper means for persuasion, discovery of truth,and as the determinant of action.

Each person should seek truth above all to guide his life.

Socrates opposed the teaching of rhetoric as artistic, emotionaloratory that did not require logic or proof.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 5 / 16

Page 12: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Knowledge and Perception in Plato

Theaetetus: a great work on epistemology

Written as a dialogue between Socrates on one side (questioner)and Theaetetus and Theodorus on the other (responder).Examines several definitions of knowledge and rejects all of them.

The first one is immediately dismissed, while three others aredismissed after detailed investigation.

Does not offer any definition of knowledge.The dialectical method need not necessarily resolve an issue.

“Dogmatism and skepticism are both, in a sense, absolutephilosophies; one is certain of knowing, the other of notknowing. What philosophy should dissipate is certainty,whether of knowledge or ignorance.”

– Bertrand Russell

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 6 / 16

Page 13: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Knowledge and Perception in Plato

Theaetetus: a great work on epistemology

Written as a dialogue between Socrates on one side (questioner)and Theaetetus and Theodorus on the other (responder).Examines several definitions of knowledge and rejects all of them.

The first one is immediately dismissed, while three others aredismissed after detailed investigation.

Does not offer any definition of knowledge.The dialectical method need not necessarily resolve an issue.

“Dogmatism and skepticism are both, in a sense, absolutephilosophies; one is certain of knowing, the other of notknowing. What philosophy should dissipate is certainty,whether of knowledge or ignorance.”

– Bertrand Russell

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 6 / 16

Page 14: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Knowledge and Perception in Plato (Contd.)

0. Knowledge of things may be given by examples such as geometry,astronomy, arithmetic.

Criticism: Examples of X are neither necessary nor sufficient for adefinition of X .

1. Knowledge is perception.

One who knows something is perceiving the thing that he knowsand so, knowledge is nothing but perception.Some criticisms put forward by Socrates.

Perception is through sense-organs rather than with them.Certain kinds of knowledge (e.g., sounds and colours are unlike) isnot connected to any sense-organ.Only the mind can reach existence and truth cannot be reachedwithout reaching existence.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 7 / 16

Page 15: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Knowledge and Perception in Plato (Contd.)

0. Knowledge of things may be given by examples such as geometry,astronomy, arithmetic.

Criticism: Examples of X are neither necessary nor sufficient for adefinition of X .

1. Knowledge is perception.

One who knows something is perceiving the thing that he knowsand so, knowledge is nothing but perception.Some criticisms put forward by Socrates.

Perception is through sense-organs rather than with them.Certain kinds of knowledge (e.g., sounds and colours are unlike) isnot connected to any sense-organ.Only the mind can reach existence and truth cannot be reachedwithout reaching existence.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 7 / 16

Page 16: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Knowledge and Perception in Plato (Contd.)

0. Knowledge of things may be given by examples such as geometry,astronomy, arithmetic.

Criticism: Examples of X are neither necessary nor sufficient for adefinition of X .

1. Knowledge is perception.

One who knows something is perceiving the thing that he knowsand so, knowledge is nothing but perception.Some criticisms put forward by Socrates.

Perception is through sense-organs rather than with them.Certain kinds of knowledge (e.g., sounds and colours are unlike) isnot connected to any sense-organ.Only the mind can reach existence and truth cannot be reachedwithout reaching existence.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 7 / 16

Page 17: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Knowledge and Perception in Plato (Contd.)

2. Knowledge is true belief.

Possibility of false belief is explored and found to be unsatisfactory.Accidental true belief cannot be called knowledge.

Provides the example of Athenian juries.

3. Knowledge is true belief with an account (logos).Three possible explanations of logos is examined and found to beunsatisfactory.

Logos means speech or statement.Logos of O is an enumeration of the elements of O.To give the logos of O is to provide the diagnostic feature wherein Odiffers from everything else.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 8 / 16

Page 18: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Knowledge and Perception in Plato (Contd.)

2. Knowledge is true belief.

Possibility of false belief is explored and found to be unsatisfactory.Accidental true belief cannot be called knowledge.

Provides the example of Athenian juries.

3. Knowledge is true belief with an account (logos).Three possible explanations of logos is examined and found to beunsatisfactory.

Logos means speech or statement.Logos of O is an enumeration of the elements of O.To give the logos of O is to provide the diagnostic feature wherein Odiffers from everything else.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 8 / 16

Page 19: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Theory of Ideas

What is meant by the word ‘cat’?Something different from any particular animal.If the word ‘cat’ means anything, then it denotes some kind ofuniversal ‘cattiness’.This notion does not arise with the birth of a particular cat.The notion has no position in space or time; it is eternal.

Universals.Idea or form: whenever a group of things have a common name,they have a common idea.This idea is real, particular things (such as particular beds) areunreal.There can be knowledge only about the real bed; in respect ofparticular beds, there can only be opinion.

Theorems are discovered rather than being invented.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 9 / 16

Page 20: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Theory of Ideas

What is meant by the word ‘cat’?Something different from any particular animal.If the word ‘cat’ means anything, then it denotes some kind ofuniversal ‘cattiness’.This notion does not arise with the birth of a particular cat.The notion has no position in space or time; it is eternal.

Universals.Idea or form: whenever a group of things have a common name,they have a common idea.This idea is real, particular things (such as particular beds) areunreal.There can be knowledge only about the real bed; in respect ofparticular beds, there can only be opinion.

Theorems are discovered rather than being invented.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 9 / 16

Page 21: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Theory of Ideas

What is meant by the word ‘cat’?Something different from any particular animal.If the word ‘cat’ means anything, then it denotes some kind ofuniversal ‘cattiness’.This notion does not arise with the birth of a particular cat.The notion has no position in space or time; it is eternal.

Universals.Idea or form: whenever a group of things have a common name,they have a common idea.This idea is real, particular things (such as particular beds) areunreal.There can be knowledge only about the real bed; in respect ofparticular beds, there can only be opinion.

Theorems are discovered rather than being invented.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 9 / 16

Page 22: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

René Descartes (1596–1650)

Considered to be the founder of modern philosophy.Proposed the coordinate geometry.

Connection between geometry and algebra and use of algebraicmethods to solve geometrical problems.The cartesian coordinates bear his name.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 10 / 16

Page 23: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Method of Cartesian Doubt

The process of doubting everything possible until something isfound which cannot be doubted.There remains something which cannot be doubted.

No demon, however cunning, could deceive me if I did not exist.

Cogito ergo sum.I think, therefore I am.

Existence of the first person is assured.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 11 / 16

Page 24: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Method of Cartesian Doubt

The process of doubting everything possible until something isfound which cannot be doubted.There remains something which cannot be doubted.

No demon, however cunning, could deceive me if I did not exist.

Cogito ergo sum.I think, therefore I am.

Existence of the first person is assured.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 11 / 16

Page 25: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Method of Cartesian Doubt

The process of doubting everything possible until something isfound which cannot be doubted.There remains something which cannot be doubted.

No demon, however cunning, could deceive me if I did not exist.

Cogito ergo sum.I think, therefore I am.

Existence of the first person is assured.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 11 / 16

Page 26: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Method of Cartesian Doubt

The process of doubting everything possible until something isfound which cannot be doubted.There remains something which cannot be doubted.

No demon, however cunning, could deceive me if I did not exist.

Cogito ergo sum.I think, therefore I am.

Existence of the first person is assured.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 11 / 16

Page 27: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Method of Cartesian Doubt (Contd.)

Why is the cogito so evident?Because it is clear and distinct.Principle: All things that we conceive very clearly and very distinctlyare true.Descartes admits that there is sometimes difficulty in knowingwhich things these are.

Since thought is the essence of mind, the mind must always think,even during deep sleep.

Goes on to a detailed investigation aimed at building the edifice ofknowledge.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 12 / 16

Page 28: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Method of Cartesian Doubt (Contd.)

Why is the cogito so evident?Because it is clear and distinct.Principle: All things that we conceive very clearly and very distinctlyare true.Descartes admits that there is sometimes difficulty in knowingwhich things these are.

Since thought is the essence of mind, the mind must always think,even during deep sleep.

Goes on to a detailed investigation aimed at building the edifice ofknowledge.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 12 / 16

Page 29: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Method of Cartesian Doubt (Contd.)

Why is the cogito so evident?Because it is clear and distinct.Principle: All things that we conceive very clearly and very distinctlyare true.Descartes admits that there is sometimes difficulty in knowingwhich things these are.

Since thought is the essence of mind, the mind must always think,even during deep sleep.

Goes on to a detailed investigation aimed at building the edifice ofknowledge.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 12 / 16

Page 30: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism

John Locke (1632–1704):

The only knowledge humans can have is a posteriori, i.e., basedupon experience.

Human mind is a white paper on which the experiences derivedfrom sense impressions as a person’s life proceeds are written.Two sources of our ideas: sensation and the perception of theoperation of our own mind.

We can only think by means of ideas.All ideas come from experience.So, none of our knowledge can antedate experience.

Our knowledge of things is a perception of ideas.Perception is the first step and degree towards knowledge.Advocates complete dependence of knowledge on perception.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 13 / 16

Page 31: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism

John Locke (1632–1704):

The only knowledge humans can have is a posteriori, i.e., basedupon experience.

Human mind is a white paper on which the experiences derivedfrom sense impressions as a person’s life proceeds are written.Two sources of our ideas: sensation and the perception of theoperation of our own mind.

We can only think by means of ideas.All ideas come from experience.So, none of our knowledge can antedate experience.

Our knowledge of things is a perception of ideas.Perception is the first step and degree towards knowledge.Advocates complete dependence of knowledge on perception.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 13 / 16

Page 32: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism

John Locke (1632–1704):

The only knowledge humans can have is a posteriori, i.e., basedupon experience.

Human mind is a white paper on which the experiences derivedfrom sense impressions as a person’s life proceeds are written.Two sources of our ideas: sensation and the perception of theoperation of our own mind.

We can only think by means of ideas.All ideas come from experience.So, none of our knowledge can antedate experience.

Our knowledge of things is a perception of ideas.Perception is the first step and degree towards knowledge.Advocates complete dependence of knowledge on perception.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 13 / 16

Page 33: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism

John Locke (1632–1704):

The only knowledge humans can have is a posteriori, i.e., basedupon experience.

Human mind is a white paper on which the experiences derivedfrom sense impressions as a person’s life proceeds are written.Two sources of our ideas: sensation and the perception of theoperation of our own mind.

We can only think by means of ideas.All ideas come from experience.So, none of our knowledge can antedate experience.

Our knowledge of things is a perception of ideas.Perception is the first step and degree towards knowledge.Advocates complete dependence of knowledge on perception.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 13 / 16

Page 34: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism (Contd.)

George Berkeley (1685–1753):Considered that Locke’s view opened the door to ultimate atheism. Putforward another (and an extreme) form of empericism.

Things only exist either as a result of their being perceived, or byvirtue of the fact that they are an entity doing the perceiving.

Denies the existence of matter independent of perception.

God is always perceiving everything.Some consequences:

God becomes central to the theory.Conception of the infinite becomes troublesome.

Some criticisms:Peculiar application of logical/deductive method to the process ofperceiving.To be observed is merely to have certain effects.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 14 / 16

Page 35: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism (Contd.)

George Berkeley (1685–1753):Considered that Locke’s view opened the door to ultimate atheism. Putforward another (and an extreme) form of empericism.

Things only exist either as a result of their being perceived, or byvirtue of the fact that they are an entity doing the perceiving.

Denies the existence of matter independent of perception.

God is always perceiving everything.Some consequences:

God becomes central to the theory.Conception of the infinite becomes troublesome.

Some criticisms:Peculiar application of logical/deductive method to the process ofperceiving.To be observed is merely to have certain effects.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 14 / 16

Page 36: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism (Contd.)

George Berkeley (1685–1753):Considered that Locke’s view opened the door to ultimate atheism. Putforward another (and an extreme) form of empericism.

Things only exist either as a result of their being perceived, or byvirtue of the fact that they are an entity doing the perceiving.

Denies the existence of matter independent of perception.

God is always perceiving everything.Some consequences:

God becomes central to the theory.Conception of the infinite becomes troublesome.

Some criticisms:Peculiar application of logical/deductive method to the process ofperceiving.To be observed is merely to have certain effects.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 14 / 16

Page 37: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism (Contd.)

George Berkeley (1685–1753):Considered that Locke’s view opened the door to ultimate atheism. Putforward another (and an extreme) form of empericism.

Things only exist either as a result of their being perceived, or byvirtue of the fact that they are an entity doing the perceiving.

Denies the existence of matter independent of perception.

God is always perceiving everything.Some consequences:

God becomes central to the theory.Conception of the infinite becomes troublesome.

Some criticisms:Peculiar application of logical/deductive method to the process ofperceiving.To be observed is merely to have certain effects.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 14 / 16

Page 38: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism (Contd.)

George Berkeley (1685–1753):Considered that Locke’s view opened the door to ultimate atheism. Putforward another (and an extreme) form of empericism.

Things only exist either as a result of their being perceived, or byvirtue of the fact that they are an entity doing the perceiving.

Denies the existence of matter independent of perception.

God is always perceiving everything.Some consequences:

God becomes central to the theory.Conception of the infinite becomes troublesome.

Some criticisms:Peculiar application of logical/deductive method to the process ofperceiving.To be observed is merely to have certain effects.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 14 / 16

Page 39: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism (Contd.)

David Hume (1711-1776):Developed the emperical philosophy of Locke and Berkeley to itslogical conclusion (Russell).

Framework of knowledge: perceptions and relations.

Two kinds of perceptions: impressions and ideas.

Impressions have more force and violence.Ideas.

Simple: these are like impressions, but fainter.Complex: need not resemble impressions; constituents of complexideas are derived from impressions, e.g., winged horse.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 15 / 16

Page 40: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism (Contd.)

David Hume (1711-1776):Developed the emperical philosophy of Locke and Berkeley to itslogical conclusion (Russell).

Framework of knowledge: perceptions and relations.

Two kinds of perceptions: impressions and ideas.

Impressions have more force and violence.Ideas.

Simple: these are like impressions, but fainter.Complex: need not resemble impressions; constituents of complexideas are derived from impressions, e.g., winged horse.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 15 / 16

Page 41: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

British Empericism (Contd.)

David Hume (1711-1776):Developed the emperical philosophy of Locke and Berkeley to itslogical conclusion (Russell).

Framework of knowledge: perceptions and relations.

Two kinds of perceptions: impressions and ideas.

Impressions have more force and violence.Ideas.

Simple: these are like impressions, but fainter.Complex: need not resemble impressions; constituents of complexideas are derived from impressions, e.g., winged horse.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 15 / 16

Page 42: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Humean Relations

Resemblance; Contrariety; Degrees in Quality; Proportions inQuantity or Number.

These depend only on ideas and can be changed without change inthe ideas.These relations give certain knowledge. Our knowledge concerningother relations are uncertain.

Identity, Spatio-Temporal Relations.Do not depend only on ideas, but, the mind does not go beyondwhat is presented to the senses.

Causal.The only relation which enables us to infer something from someother thing.But, there is no such thing as an impression of a causal relation;not possible to perceive a relation which can be called causal.This was in marked contrast with previous philosophy which hadconsidered cause and effect to be connected by logical necessity.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 16 / 16

Page 43: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Humean Relations

Resemblance; Contrariety; Degrees in Quality; Proportions inQuantity or Number.

These depend only on ideas and can be changed without change inthe ideas.These relations give certain knowledge. Our knowledge concerningother relations are uncertain.

Identity, Spatio-Temporal Relations.Do not depend only on ideas, but, the mind does not go beyondwhat is presented to the senses.

Causal.The only relation which enables us to infer something from someother thing.But, there is no such thing as an impression of a causal relation;not possible to perceive a relation which can be called causal.This was in marked contrast with previous philosophy which hadconsidered cause and effect to be connected by logical necessity.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 16 / 16

Page 44: Brief Introduction to Epistemology

Humean Relations

Resemblance; Contrariety; Degrees in Quality; Proportions inQuantity or Number.

These depend only on ideas and can be changed without change inthe ideas.These relations give certain knowledge. Our knowledge concerningother relations are uncertain.

Identity, Spatio-Temporal Relations.Do not depend only on ideas, but, the mind does not go beyondwhat is presented to the senses.

Causal.The only relation which enables us to infer something from someother thing.But, there is no such thing as an impression of a causal relation;not possible to perceive a relation which can be called causal.This was in marked contrast with previous philosophy which hadconsidered cause and effect to be connected by logical necessity.

Palash Sarkar (ISI, Kolkata) Epistemology 16 / 16