Upload
justin
View
67
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Borderline between plant protection products and biocides with regard to registration and use. SUI Conference 2013, 11th-12th BratislavaLaurent Oger [email protected]. Overview. Scope Legislative evolutions Common elements of both legislations Qualification criteria - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Borderline between plant protection products and biocides with regard to registration and use
SUI Conference 2013, 11th-12th Bratislava Laurent [email protected]
Overview
Scope
Legislative evolutions
Common elements of both legislations
Qualification criteria
Examples of borderline biocide cases
Examples of borderline PPP cases
The example of rodenticides
Situations of dual authorisations
Scope
Plant
Protection
Products
Biocidal
products
Horticulture Home & Garden
Agriculture Forestry
Amenity Preservatives
(PT 6-13)
• For wood • For liquid-cooling and processing
systems• For products during storage• For film• For construction materials• Slimicides• For fibre, leather, ribber and
polymerised materials
Others products
(PT 21-22)
• Antifouling products• Embalming and
taxidermist fluids
Disinfectants (PT
1-5)
• Food and feed area• Veterinary hygiene• Drinking water• Disinfectants and
algeacides• Human hygiene
Pest control (PT
14-20)
• Rodenticides• Avicides• Molluscicides, vermicides…• Piscicides• Insecticides, acaricides…• Repellents and attractants• Control of other vertebrates
Legislative evolution
Directive 91/414/EEC
concerning the placing of
plant protection products on
the market
Directive 98/8/EC
on the placing on the market of
biocidal products
Regulation 528/2012
concerning the placing
on the market and use
of biocidal products
?
?
Regulation 1107/2009
concerning the placing of
plant protection products
on the market
Directive 128/2009
on the sustainable use of
pesticides
Common elements
Exclusion criteria and derogations
Candidates for substitution and comparative assessment
Sustainable Use of products
Harmonization and simplifications procedures
Active Substance approval at EU level
Product authorisation at Member State level
‘biocidal product’ means any substance or mixture, in the form in which it is supplied to the user, consisting of, containing or generating one or more active substances, with the intention of destroying, deterring, rendering harmless, preventing the action of, or otherwise exerting a controlling effect on, any harmful organism by any means other than mere physical or mechanical action
‘harmful organism’ means an organism, including pathogenic agents, which has an unwanted presence or a detrimental effect on humans, their activities or the products they use or produce, on animals or the environment;
‘plants’ means live plants and live parts of plants, including fresh fruit, vegetables and seeds;
‘plant products’ means products of plant origin in an unprocessed state or having undergone only simple preparation, such as milling, drying or pressing, but excluding plants;
PPPs: products, in the form in which they are supplied to the user, consisting of or containing active substances, safeners or synergists, and intended for one of the following uses:
(a) protecting plants or plant products against all harmful organisms or preventing the action of such organisms, unless the main purpose of these products is considered to be for reasons of hygiene rather than for the protection of plants or plant products; (b) influencing the life processes of plants, such as substances influencing their growth, other than as a nutrient; (c) preserving plant products, in so far as such substances or products are not subject to special Community provisions on preservatives; (d) destroying undesired plants or parts of plants, except algae unless the products are applied on soil or water to protect plants; (e) checking or preventing undesired growth of plants, except algae unless the products are applied on soil or water to protect plants.
Qualification criteria
Identification of the relevant legislation – some definitions
Criteria for borderline cases
Consideration of the written exclusions within the scope of
each legislations (articles 2 and 3 of 1107/2009 and
528/2012)
In case of unclear or borderline situations for a product the
European Commission developed specific guidance
document on borderline cases:
• Available at :
http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/evaluation/borderline
_en.htm
• Manual of Decision available (regularly updated)
Step 1: Define the intended purpose of the product
Criteria of the target organism.
• If detrimental to plant or plant products then it is a
PPP
• If it is detrimental to other areas it is considered as a
Biocide
Criteria for borderline cases
Prevent introduction of
foreign
species/pathogens
Step 2: The place where the product is applied to achieve
the principal intended action.
Protection against harmful organisms to plants and plant products: PPP
• Directly : where the products are used, even inside or
outside
• Indirectly: PPPs in condition that the purpose is to destroy
exclusively and specifically organisms harmful to plants or
plant products (e.g storage area)
Products used for a general hygiene purpose: biocide
Protection of the
wood
Examples of PPPs
Space disinfectants in growing houses or greenhouses.
Products to control growth or penetration of plant roots and sprouts.
Products for use against garden snails
Products for the disinfection or the disinfestation of empty store rooms or
other structures if after the treatment only plants or plant products will be
grown or stored there.
Products for post-harvest treatment of fruits and vegetables against plant
diseases
Repellents used to treat seed, fruit trees or forestry against birds
Products to protect trees or other plants from damage by squirrels or wildlife
All herbicides regardless of whether they are applied to soil, water or other
surfaces
Algaecides applied on soil or water to protect plants
Arthropod growth regulators and other pheromones used to control organisms
harmful to plants or plant products.
Products for hygiene purposes to be used in greenhouses not intended for direct application to plants.
Products used on a hydroponic systems to control harmful organisms.
Products intended for the control of harmful organisms (other than plants), on surfaces like tennis courts, car parks
and tombstones, concrete, pavements and walls.
Products used against snails to prevent humans and animals disease transmission.
Products used against snails that clog water pipes.
Products to destroy dust mites from textiles.
Fumigants used in storage rooms for food
Repellents against cats, dogs and snakes
Products added to water to wash fruits for public hygiene
Products for the control of termites when used as a bait or as a soil-drench treatment
Products for the control of birds for hygiene purposes
Examples of biocides
It should include products used for there general
hygiene function. Disinfectants in empty structures when
it is not clear which kind of products will be stored after the
treatment.
There main purpose is considered to be for human hygiene
All rodenticides are considered as Biocidal Products:
• Exclusion of products used in plant growing areas to protect plants, or to
protect plant products temporarily stored in the plant growing areas.
• Products used outside the plant growing areas: in farms, cities, industrial premises
are biocidal products.
• Products used inside the plant growing areas not to protect plant or plant products
(agricultural field, greenhouse, forest) are biocidal products.
• Products used inside the plant growing areas to protect plants or plant products
temporarily stored here are PPPs.
The example of rodenticides
Situations of dual authorisations
A same product can be used in several situations and fall under both
legislations.
Dual authorisation:
x2 dossiers
x2 contacts with different rapporteur Member states
x2 fees• In case of similar conditions of use authorities should coordinate (even
internally) and give a clear answer under which legislation to be regulated.
E.g indoor products
• Coordination at EU level and experience sharing between Member States
should allow pragmatic solutions and the limitation of borderline cases.
Thank you for your attention