Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    1/20

    ST 9132 PROECT WORK PHASE II

    REVIEW I

    BY

    BOOBALAN A (2011208031)

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    2/20

    1 ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF FLY ASH

    DATA .

    2 RELAVANT FLY ASH LITERATURE

    COLLECTION

    3 CONFORMING BEHAVIOURAL OF

    FLY ASH DETAILS.

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    3/20

    4 PRELIMINARY TEST

    5

    CUBE CASTING(M25 GRADE-10%,20%,40%,50%-FLY ASH REPLACEMENT)

    6

    STRENGTH TEST (COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH,FLEXURAL

    STRENGTH TEST,SPILIT TENSILE STRENGTHTEST)

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    4/20

    7Durability tests

    8Comparison of results

    9Conclusion

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    5/20

    REQUIRED DATA:M-25 Grade concrete-10% fly ash

    replacement.

    Uncrushed aggregates (20mm)

    F.A. shows that 40% passes through

    600micron sieve.

    Slump ranges taken as 30-60mm.Concrete to be prepared at moderate

    condition.

    Reinforcement cover adopted as 25mm.

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    6/20

    Quantities IN kg/m3

    Cement =267.3

    Fly ash =29.7

    F.A =750.234

    C.A =1224.066

    water =148.5

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    7/20

    S.NO NO OF DAYS NO OF SAMPLES REQUIRED FORTESTING

    CUBE CYLINDER BEAM

    1 7 15 15 15

    2 28 15 15 15

    3 56 15 15 15

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    8/20

    Compressive Strength To determine the compressive

    strength of concrete specimens as perIS:516 - 1959. Tests should be done atrecognized ages of the test specimens,

    usually being 7 and 28 days. The ages

    should be calculated from the time of theaddition of water to the drying of

    ingredients

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    9/20

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    10/20

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    11/20

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    12/20

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    13/20

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    14/20

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    15/20

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    16/20

    S.No Wt of cube specimensat 7 days (kg)

    Load applied on cubespecimens at 7 days

    (KN)

    1 8.10 255

    2 8.12 296

    3 8.20 310

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    17/20

    S.No No of days Avg compressive strength ( N/mm2)

    10% 20% 40% 50%

    1 7 13.05 13.57 13.30 13.13

    2 28 26.90 26.51 25.20 26.12

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    18/20

    1.A. Fernandez-Jimenez I. Garca-Lodeiro A. Palomo (2006),

    Eduardo Torroja Institute (CSIC), Serrano Galvache St., 28080

    Madrid, Spain- Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious

    materials, P.No (30553065).

    2.C.S. Poon, L. Lam, Y.L. Wong (1999), Department of Civil and

    Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,

    Hung Him, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China - A study on

    high strength concrete prepared with large volumes of low calciumfly ash, P. No(447-455).

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    19/20

    C.Y. Lee, H.K. Lee, K.M. Lee (2002), Conclinic Co. Ltd.,

    Seoul, South Korea ,Department of Civil and Environmental

    Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University- Strength and micro

    structural characteristics of chemically activated fly ashcement systems, P.No(425431).

    4. Bashar S. Mohammed* and Ong Chuan Fang

    (2010),Department of Civil Engineering, College ofEngineering, University Malaysia.-Assessing the properties

    of freshly mixed concrete containing paper-mill residuals and

    class F fly ash , Vol. 2(2), P.no (17-26).

  • 7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)

    20/20

    THANK YOU