Upload
ruth-snow
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m2)
• Surrogate measure of adiposity• Weight normalized for height• Accurate and inexpensive to measure• Weight and height measurements only data needed• Limitations:
– Insensitive to small changes in weight– May overestimate body fat in those with muscular build
and those with edema– May underestimate body fat in older persons and those
who have lost muscle mass
Who is overweight?Classification of overweight and
obesity by BMIObesity class BMI (kg/m2)
Underweight <18.5
Normal 18.5 – 24.9
Overweight 25.0 – 29.9
Obesity I 30.0 – 34.9
II 35.0 – 39.9
Extreme obesity III >40
BMI and Health RiskClass Health Risk
Normal None
Overweight Increased
Obesity I High
Obesity II Very High
Obesity III Extremely High
•Waist circumference – Men >40 in., women >35 in.
•Type 2 DM, CHD, other atherosclerotic disease, sleep apnea
•Physical inactivity, ↑ triglycerides
•3 or more: smoking, HTN, ↑ LDL, ↓ HDL, IFG, family h/o premature CHD(> 45 YOA men, > 55 YOA women)
Additional risks:
Waist-to-Hip Ratio
• 6 studies (7 as of Nov. 2005) report independent linear relationship between WHR and CHD or CVD
• WHR may be better predictor of CHD/CVD than BMI
• Women: 0.8 or less
• Men: 0.95 or less
• Challenge to measure?
Health risks of overweight status
• HTN• Dyslipidemia• Diabetes• CHD• CHF• Stroke• Gallstones
• Sleep apnea• Colon cancer• Breast cancer• Endometrial cancer• Gallbladder cancer• Menstrual function
and fertility
National Weight Control Registry
• National registry of reduced-obese subjects who have lost more than 30 pounds and maintained the weight loss for more than 1 year
• Average age 45, 67% married• 80% female, 97% Caucasian• Average reported weight loss is 30 kg• Average duration of weight maintenance is 5.5 years• Provides opportunity to investigate energy metabolism
in large heterogeneous group• Currently over 5,000 individuals enrolled
Physical characteristics of NWCR subjects (mean ± SD)* Women
(n = 2350)Men
(n = 607)Total sample
(n = 2959)
Age (years) 44.8 ± 12.0 51.8 ± 13.2 46.3 ± 12.5
Maximum body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2)
36.1 ± 8.6 36.6 ± 8.9 36.2 ± 8.6
Current BMI (kg/m2) 24.5 ± 4.6 25.9 ± 4.2 24.8 ± 4.6
Change in BMI (kg/m2) 11.6 ± 6.1 10.6 ± 6.5 11.4 ± 6.2
Maximum weight (kg/m2) 99.1 ± 24.5 118.3 ± 30.9 103.0 ± 27.1
Current weight (kg) 67.2 ± 13.5 83.8 ± 15.2 70.6 ± 15.4
Weight loss (kg) 31.9 ± 16.9 34.5 ± 21.8 32.4 ± 18.0
Duration of weight loss (years) 5.7 ± 7.2 7.1 ± 9.1 6.0 ± 7.6
* Two subjects did not report gender. Wyatt et al, Obes Res 10(2):78; 2002
NWCR Method of weight loss
Method Women (N=355) Men (N=83)
No. % No. %
Lost weight on own 128 36 46 55*
Lost weight with assistance 227 64 37 45
Commercial program 173 76 30 81
Self-help group 54 24 8 22
Dietitian 50 22 19 51*
Psychologist 29 13 6 16
Other (physician, nurse, exercise clubs) 66 29 9 24
aPercents add to more than 100% because participants may have used more than one of the types of help.
*Statistically significant from women; P<.05.
“The initial goal of weight loss therapy is to reduce body weight by
approximately 10% from baseline.”
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults, 1998.
Moderate weight loss – 10 to 15% of body weight – decreases medical problems in 90% of obese persons, including
• heart function• blood pressure• glucose tolerance• sleep disorders• lipid profiles
N Engl J Med, 314:334-339;1986Am J Cardiol, 60:55G-58G;1987Arch Int Med, 147:1749-1753;1987J Am Diet Assoc, 93:445-449;1993
What is reasonable weight loss?
• 60 obese women
• 40 + 8.7 years of age
• Weight 99.1 + 12.3 kg
• BMI = 36.3 + 4.3 kg/m2
Foster et al, J Consult Clin Psychol, 1997
Defined Weights
• Dream Weight– Weight you would choose if you could weigh
whatever you wanted
• Happy Weight– This weight is not as ideal as your dream
weight; it is a weight however, that you be happy to achieve
Defined Weights, cont.
• Acceptable Weight– A weight that you would not be particularly happy
with, but one that you could accept, since it is less than your current weight
• Disappointed Weight– A weight that is less than your current weight, but one
that you could not view as successful in any way. You would be disappointed if this were your final eight after the program.
Goal weights
• Goal weight was an average 32% reduction in body weight
• Three times greater than the NAS and USDA recommended goals
• Greatly exceeds weight losses of nonsurgical treatments
Dream = 0%
24%
20%47%
9%Acceptable
Disappointed
Did not reachdisappointedweight
Happy
% Achieving Defined Weights at Week 48 (n=45)
Weight loss: 16.3 + 7.2 kg
Meta-analysis of 493 studies looking at exercise versus diet
Miller et al. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 21:941-947, 1997
-6.4
-23.5-24.2
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Exercise Alone Diet Alone Diet + Exercise
Po
un
ds
lost
Why is diet more effective than exercise in weight loss?
Number of minutes necessary to expend calories (160 pound person walking 3 mph):
12 oz. cola 36 minutes(150 kcal)
Glazed donut 58 minutes(242 kcal)
Large order of french 128 minutesfries (540 kcal)
Exercise is most important for weight maintenance!
• Only 9% of NWCR participants report maintaining weight loss without regular physical activity
• Women report an average of 2545 kcal on physical activity per week
• Men report an average of 3293 kcal per week• This level of exercise equivalent to about 1 hour
of moderate physical activity (brisk walking) per day
Wing and Hill, Annu Rev Nutr 2:323-341;2001
Six most common activities reported by NWCR participants
Activity
Walking
Cycling
Weight lifting
Aerobics
Running
Stair climbing
% reporting engaging in activity
76.6
20.6
20.3
17.8
10.5
9.3
Successful Weight Loss Maintenance
NWCR participants• On average, report consuming 1381 kcal
per day (24% kcal from fat)• 7.6% report eating less than 90 grams
carbohydrate per day• Over 44% weigh themselves at least once a
day, 31% report weighing themselves at least once a week
Successful Weight Loss Maintenance, cont
• 72% expend more than 2000 kcal on physical activity per week
• Self-monitoring food intake was frequently reported
• Maintaining weight loss for 2 to 5 years decreased the risk of subsequent regain by 50%
Wing et al, Annu Rev Nutr, 21:323-41;201