BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS - Macomb County, …boc.macombgov.org/sites/default/files/content/government/boc/pdfs... · Board of Commissioners ... 216,327 219,327 50,067 69,992 149,335

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

1 S. Main St., 9th Floor Mount Clemens, Michigan 48043 586.469.5125 FAX 586.469.5993

macombcountymi.gov/boardofcommissioners

FINANCE COMMITTEE

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2012

AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Adoption of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes dated 11-22 (special) and 29 (special) and 12-13-11 (previously distributed) 5. Public Participation (five minutes maximum per speaker, or longer at the discretion of the Chairperson related only to issues contained on the agenda) 6. Quarterly Expenditure and Revenue Reports for 12-31-11 (mailed) 7. Report by ADG Eco & Energy Advisement Group (mailed) 8. Appointment of Law Firms (5) (mailed) 9. Item Referred from 1-24-12 Justice & Public Safety Committee Meeting:

a) Contract Extension with Sound Counseling to Provide Professional (attached) and Therapeutic Services at the Juvenile Justice Center

10. Adoption of Proclamation Commending Gordon Fuerstenau - Retirement as (attached)

Supervisor of Richmond Township (offered by Brown) 11. New Business 12. Public Participation (five minutes maximum per speaker or longer at the discretion of the Chairperson) 13. Adjournment

Toni Moceri – District 1

Phillip A DiMaria- District 3 David Flynn - District 4

Ray Gralewski- District 5

Kathy D. Vosburg District 8 Chair

Roland Fraschetti- District 10

Kathy Tocco- District 11

MACOMB COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Fred Miller District 9 Sergeant-At-Arms

Marvin E. Sauger District 2 Vice Chair

James L. Carabelli - District 6

Don Brown- District 7Bob Smith- District 12

Joe Sabatini- District 13

RESOLUTION NO. _____________ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE:__________________ AGENDA ITEM:______________________________ MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO receive and file the Quarterly Expenditure and Revenue Reports for 12-31-11 INTRODUCED BY: Don Brown, Chair, Finance Committee

COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE Finance 1-25-12

1

Adopted Amended QTD YTD Over (Under)

Description Budget Budget Actual Actual Budget % Utilized

December 31 Year-End Funds

General Fund 198,059,012$ 199,249,339$ 41,794,651$ 141,376,264$ (57,873,075)$ 70.95%

Freedom Hill Park 262,507 262,507 21,522 86,938 (175,569) 33.12%

Health Department 19,244,156 21,890,768 3,442,470 13,800,432 (8,090,336) 63.04%

Martha T Berry 22,834,441 22,834,441 4,780,097 19,688,928 (3,145,513) 86.22%

Research & Reference Center 1,160,356 1,160,356 190,808 744,372 (415,984) 64.15%

Senior Citizens Services 1,711,542 1,750,434 342,841 1,328,277 (422,157) 75.88%

Veterans' Affairs 1,100,870 1,100,870 194,129 797,576 (303,294) 72.45%

244,372,884$ 248,248,715$ 50,766,518$ 177,822,787$ (70,425,928)$ 71.63%

September 30 Year-End Funds

Adult Drug Court 256,595$ 256,595$ 39,350$ 39,350$ (217,245)$ 15.34%

Child Care Fund 26,049,016 26,061,379 3,646,808 3,646,808 (22,414,571) 13.99%

Community Corrections 1,320,654 1,320,654 250,285 250,285 (1,070,369) 18.95%

Community Mental Health 198,280,985 198,350,985 21,958,757 21,958,757 (176,392,228) 11.07%

Community Services 16,540,939 16,684,087 3,681,595 3,681,595 (13,002,492) 22.07%

Friend of the Court 10,645,674 10,645,674 2,367,174 2,367,174 (8,278,500) 22.24%

Health Grants 4,030,902 4,183,135 759,243 759,243 (3,423,892) 18.15%

Prosecuting Attorney Grants 2,164,272 2,164,272 491,597 491,597 (1,672,675) 22.71%

Roads 88,999,752 89,053,698 17,404,844 17,404,844 (71,648,854) 19.54%

Sheriff Grants 2,161,622 2,161,622 398,651 398,651 (1,762,971) 18.44%

Substance Abuse 9,032,603 9,032,603 865,790 865,790 (8,166,813) 9.59%

359,483,014$ 359,914,704$ 51,864,094$ 51,864,094$ (308,050,610)$ 14.41%

Macomb County, Michigan

Quarterly Expenditure Report - Summary by Fund

Quarter Ended December 31, 2011

2

Adopted Amended QTD YTD (Over) Under


Board of Commissioners

Salaries and fringe benefits 1,192,568$ 1,201,256$ 253,688$ 1,056,347$ 144,909$ 87.94%

Operating expenses 117,790 192,415 42,922 111,334 81,081 57.86%

1,310,358 1,393,671 296,610 1,167,681 225,990 83.78%

Public Affairs

Salaries and fringe benefits 3,142 3,142 - - 3,142 0.00%

3,142 3,142 - - 3,142 0.00%

Circuit Court

Salaries and fringe benefits 4,707,198 4,708,025 1,092,059 4,331,845 376,180 92.01%

Operating expenses 4,809,416 4,810,016 1,158,397 3,865,683 944,333 80.37%

9,516,614 9,518,041 2,250,456 8,197,528 1,320,513 86.13%

Family Counseling

Salaries and fringe benefits 58,427 58,427 14,511 58,242 185 99.68%


208,348 208,498 43,828 150,477 58,021 72.17%

District Court-Romeo

Salaries and fringe benefits 876,859 850,018 200,550 800,878 49,140 94.22%


Capital outlay - 26,841 - 21,306 5,535 79.38%

1,074,709 1,074,709 241,271 960,960 113,749 89.42%

District Court-3rd Class


50,000 50,000 5,865 26,002 23,998 52.00%

District Court New Baltimore

Salaries and fringe benefits 1,123,061 1,117,936 262,775 1,061,710 56,226 94.97%


Capital outlay - 2,125 613 613 1,512 28.85%

1,339,388 1,339,388 313,455 1,132,315 207,073 84.54%

Probate Court - Mental



977,967 978,657 203,583 848,950 129,707 86.75%

Probate Court - WIlls & Estate



2,430,221 2,442,936 564,436 2,346,731 96,205 96.06%

Family Court - Juvenile


Operating expenses 1,569,742 1,573,579 300,247 1,024,334 549,245 65.10%

5,566,215 5,402,388 1,246,928 4,789,225 613,163 88.65%


Quarterly Expenditure Report


Fund: General Fund (December 31 Year-End)

3






Probation - Circuit Court


124,999 128,024 18,270 110,360 17,664 86.20%

Probation - District Court



1,049,944 1,051,963 195,613 825,015 226,948 78.43%

Jury Commission


Capital outlay - 27,839 1,745 12,304 15,535 44.20%

72,156 146,340 14,824 50,772 95,568 34.69%

County Executive



682,307 1,068,878 286,361 872,841 196,037 81.66%

Elections


Operating transfers out 337,950 337,950 - - 337,950 0.00%

374,534 374,534 2,541 8,753 365,781 2.34%

Information Technology


Operating expenses 2,102,773 2,273,373 202,914 1,723,375 549,998 75.81%

5,504,794 5,627,566 946,418 4,804,654 822,912 85.38%

Reimbursement



789,170 789,170 178,468 692,302 96,868 87.73%

Corporation Counsel



851,281 852,706 205,847 832,029 20,677 97.58%

County Clerk



Capital outlay - 19,431 - 14,673 4,758 75.51%

3,933,660 3,967,101 938,876 3,721,958 245,143 93.82%


4






Apportionment Comm

Operating expenses 38,774 38,774 - - 38,774 0.00%

38,774 38,774 - - 38,774 0.00%

Finance Department



1,851,962 1,856,679 378,401 1,547,672 309,007 83.36%

Risk Management & Safety



358,904 364,129 88,686 342,380 21,749 94.03%

Equalization



948,084 948,234 190,417 775,748 172,486 81.81%

Human Resources



1,746,296 1,746,296 448,400 1,626,454 119,842 93.14%

Prosecuting Attorney



Operating transfers out 25,000 38,500 - 28,281 10,219 73.46%

8,634,127 8,634,614 2,058,017 8,338,157 296,457 96.57%

Purchasing

Salaries and fringe benefits 1,176,846 1,181,539 241,998 952,738 228,801 80.64%


1,399,743 1,405,935 276,636 1,123,337 282,598 79.90%

Register of Deeds



1,646,124 1,639,074 350,046 1,416,172 222,902 86.40%

Treasurer



2,089,557 2,089,594 499,543 1,966,408 123,186 94.10%

Facilities and Operations


Operating expenses 8,007,915 8,069,839 1,253,624 6,208,962 1,860,877 76.94%

Capital outlay - 26,305 - 26,055 250 99.05%

14,844,209 14,936,420 2,793,242 12,300,444 2,635,976 82.35%


5






Public Works



4,551,313 4,951,309 1,173,366 4,779,383 171,926 96.53%

MSU Extension



927,448 927,485 207,743 789,310 138,175 85.10%

Planning & Econ Develop



Capital outlay - 1,573 830 1,573 - 100.00%

2,411,763 2,521,022 561,491 2,241,317 279,705 88.91%

Plat Board

Operating expenses 1,000 1,000 - - 1,000 0.00%

1,000 1,000 - - 1,000 0.00%

Civil Service Comm

Operating expenses 17,250 17,250 2 2,533 14,717 14.68%

17,250 17,250 2 2,533 14,717 14.68%

Sheriff

Salaries and fringe benefits 48,447,293 48,278,575 12,412,430 45,363,825 2,914,750 93.96%


Capital outlay 84,832 84,832 - 13,095 71,737 15.44%

59,459,867 59,252,474 15,631,307 54,734,093 4,518,381 92.37%

Court Building Safety

Salaries and fringe benefits 800,926 803,876 183,796 811,271 (7,395) 100.92%


Capital outlay 1,300 1,300 - - 1,300 0.00%

820,796 823,746 187,514 827,928 (4,182) 100.51%

Emergency Management

Salaries and fringe benefits 227,070 227,070 57,310 226,395 675 99.70%


249,393 257,507 62,180 254,151 3,356 98.70%

Technical Services



678,891 679,190 167,262 672,416 6,774 99.00%


6






F&O Security



457,189 457,189 113,145 433,025 24,164 94.71%

Water Quality Board

Operating expenses 4,481 4,481 - 377 4,104 8.41%

4,481 4,481 - 377 4,104 8.41%

Health & Community Services

Salaries and fringe benefits - 125,793 22,697 22,697 103,096 18.04%

Operating expenses - 15,100 - - 15,100 0.00%

Capital outlay - 4,000 - - 4,000 0.00%

- 144,893 22,697 22,697 122,196 15.66%

Appropriations


Operating expenses 1,533,400 1,573,208 62,501 826,118 747,090 52.51%

Capital outlay 375,000 375,000 50,136 240,533 134,467 64.14%

Operating transfers out 30,000 30,000 - - 30,000 0.00%

2,580,258 2,568,724 116,469 1,081,925 1,486,799 42.12%

Contributions

Operating transfers out 56,481,776 56,565,608 8,514,437 14,561,784 42,003,824 25.74%

56,481,776 56,565,608 8,514,437 14,561,784 42,003,824 25.74%

198,059,012$ 199,249,339$ 41,794,651$ 141,376,264$ 57,873,075$ 70.95%


7






Salaries and fringe benefits -$ -$ -$ 2,516$ (2,516)$ 0.00%


262,507$ 262,507$ 21,522$ 86,938$ 175,569$ 33.12%



Salaries and fringe benefits 12,999,786$ 12,962,786$ 2,772,073$ 11,163,856$ 1,798,930$ 86.12%

Operating expenses 6,099,479 8,640,090 661,399 2,445,034 6,195,056 28.30%

Capital outlay 144,891 287,892 8,998 191,542 96,350 66.53%

19,244,156$ 21,890,768$ 3,442,470$ 13,800,432$ 8,090,336$ 63.04%



Salaries and fringe benefits 13,958,236$ 13,153,236$ 3,326,281$ 13,051,845$ 101,391$ 99.23%


Capital outlay 300,000 150,000 19,857 42,062 107,938 28.04%

Interest and fees 479,709 479,709 - - 479,709 0.00%

22,834,441$ 22,834,441$ 4,780,097$ 19,688,928$ 3,145,513$ 86.22%

Fund: Martha T Berry (Dec 31 Year-End)

Fund: Freedom Hill Park (Dec 31 Year-End)

Fund: Health Department (Dec 31 Year-End)

8






Salaries and fringe benefits 761,406$ 761,406$ 71,817$ 539,941$ 221,465$ 70.91%


Capital outlay 5,000 5,000 - - 5,000 0.00%

1,160,356$ 1,160,356$ 190,808$ 744,372$ 415,984$ 64.15%



Salaries and fringe benefits 1,444,792$ 1,444,792$ 317,166$ 1,217,019$ 227,773$ 84.23%


Capital outlay 2,000 9,906 3,540 3,857 6,049 38.94%

Operating transfers out - 8,679 - - 8,679 0.00%

1,711,542$ 1,750,434$ 342,841$ 1,328,277$ 422,157$ 75.88%





Capital outlay 35,000 35,000 - 9,280 25,720 26.51%

1,100,870$ 1,100,870$ 194,129$ 797,576$ 303,294$ 72.45%

Fund: Veterans' Affairs (Dec 31 Year-End)

Fund: Senior Citizens Servcies (Dec 31 Year-End)

Fund: Research and Reference Center (Dec 31 Year-End)

9








256,595$ 256,595$ 39,350$ 39,350$ 217,245$ 15.34%





Capital outlay 8,500 8,500 1,194 1,194 7,306 14.05%

26,049,016$ 26,061,379$ 3,646,808$ 3,646,808$ 22,414,571$ 13.99%





Capital outlay 1,000 1,000 - - 1,000 0.00%

1,320,654$ 1,320,654$ 250,285$ 250,285$ 1,070,369$ 18.95%





Capital outlay 124,200 124,200 7,305 7,305 116,895 5.88%

198,280,985$ 198,350,985$ 21,958,757$ 21,958,757$ 176,392,228$ 11.07%

Fund: Adult Drug Court (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Child Care Fund (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Community Corrections (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Community Mental Health (Sep 30 Year End)

10








Capital outlay 4,787 7,982 950 950 7,032 11.90%

Operating transfers out 523,223 536,183 21,390 21,390 514,793 3.99%

16,540,939$ 16,684,087$ 3,681,595$ 3,681,595$ 13,002,492$ 22.07%




Operating expenses 2,270,546 2,270,546 518,436 518,436 1,752,110 22.83%

Capital outlay 2,500 2,500 - - 2,500 0.00%

10,645,674$ 10,645,674$ 2,367,174$ 2,367,174$ 8,278,500$ 22.24%



Salaries and fringe benefits 2,879,838$ 2,908,820$ 670,103$ 670,103$ 2,238,717$ 23.04%


Capital outlay 5,950 5,950 - - 5,950 0.00%

4,030,902$ 4,183,135$ 759,243$ 759,243$ 3,423,892$ 18.15%





2,164,272$ 2,164,272$ 491,597$ 491,597$ 1,672,675$ 22.71%

Fund: Community Services (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Friend of the Court (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Health Grants (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Prosecuting Attorney Grants (Sep 30 Year End)

11








Capital outlay 2,738,354 2,677,300 228,706 228,706 2,448,594 8.54%

88,999,752$ 89,053,698$ 17,404,844$ 17,404,844$ 71,648,854$ 19.54%





2,161,622$ 2,161,622$ 398,651$ 398,651$ 1,762,971$ 18.44%





Capital outlay 60,893 60,893 1,363 1,363 59,530 2.24%

9,032,603$ 9,032,603$ 865,790$ 865,790$ 8,166,813$ 9.59%

Fund: Substance Abuse (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Roads (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Sheriff Grants (Sep 30 Year End)

12



December 31 Year-End Funds

General Fund 198,059,012$ 199,249,339$ 50,915,866$ 181,755,510$ (17,493,829)$ 91.22%

Freedom Hill Park 262,507 262,507 42,848 172,800 (89,707) 65.83%

Health Department 19,244,156 21,890,768 937,817 5,372,725 (16,518,043) 24.54%

Martha T Berry 22,834,441 22,834,441 2,016,478 19,385,787 (3,448,654) 84.90%

Research & Reference Center 1,160,356 1,160,356 800 64,637 (1,095,719) 5.57%

Senior Citizens Services 1,711,542 1,750,434 67,656 406,398 (1,344,036) 23.22%

Veterans' Affairs 1,100,870 1,100,870 92,271 1,214,954 114,084 110.36%

244,372,884$ 248,248,715$ 54,073,736$ 208,372,811$ (39,875,904)$ 83.94%

September 30 Year-End Funds

Adult Drug Court 256,595$ 256,595$ 897$ 897$ (255,698)$ 0.35%

Child Care Fund 26,049,016 26,061,379 153,076 153,076 (25,908,303) 0.59%

Community Corrections 1,320,654 1,320,654 98,135 98,135 (1,222,519) 7.43%

Community Mental Health 198,280,985 198,350,985 44,950 44,950 (198,306,035) 0.02%

Community Services 16,540,939 16,684,087 2,951,200 2,951,200 (13,732,887) 17.69%

Friend of the Court 10,645,674 10,645,674 567,869 567,869 (10,077,805) 5.33%

Health Grants 4,030,902 4,183,135 725,024 725,024 (3,458,111) 17.33%

Prosecuting Attorney Grants 2,164,272 2,164,272 30,739 30,739 (2,133,533) 1.42%

Roads 88,999,752 89,053,698 14,851,927 14,851,927 (74,201,771) 16.68%

Sheriff Grants 2,161,622 2,161,622 21,137 21,137 (2,140,485) 0.98%

Substance Abuse 9,032,603 9,032,603 - - (9,032,603) 0.00%

359,483,014$ 359,914,704$ 19,444,954$ 19,444,954$ (340,469,750)$ 5.40%


Quarterly Revenue Report - Summary by Fund


13



Taxes

Property taxes 109,511,964$ 114,247,307$ 15,052,139$ 119,334,018$ 5,086,711$ 104.45%

Licenses and permits 420,400 433,400 81,701 416,871 (16,529) 96.19%

Federal grants 73,000 73,000 30,909 47,754 (25,246) 65.42%

State grants

Court financing 5,274,971 5,274,971 1,539,374 4,096,846 (1,178,125) 77.67%

Cigarette tax 27,515 27,515 54,243 54,243 26,728 197.14%

Liquor tax 1,888,081 1,888,081 1,571,278 2,252,555 364,474 119.30%

Other state grants 602,000 602,000 204,766 462,845 (139,155) 76.88%

Charges for services

Court costs and fees 2,992,400 2,992,400 514,546 2,279,814 (712,586) 76.19%

Certified copies 823,219 823,219 209,486 863,807 40,588 104.93%

Probation oversight fees 815,000 815,000 141,513 758,115 (56,885) 93.02%

Real estate transfer tax 2,500,000 2,500,000 627,680 1,897,188 (602,812) 75.89%

Recording fees 2,185,500 2,185,500 502,727 1,917,881 (267,619) 87.75%

Rents 43,750 43,750 9,597 62,139 18,389 142.03%

Road patrol 8,212,921 8,212,921 1,987,313 7,981,999 (230,922) 97.19%

Other Sheriff services 1,490,441 1,490,441 282,974 1,482,126 (8,315) 99.44%

Attorney fees 1,500,000 1,500,000 242,525 1,467,917 (32,083) 97.86%

Public works-pump station 964,966 1,750,567 547,207 782,978 (967,589) 44.73%

Personal services 1,025,000 1,025,000 56,234 846,889 (178,111) 82.62%

Inmate housing 1,823,000 1,823,000 249,692 1,397,345 (425,655) 76.65%

Soil erosion fees 349,744 349,744 114,725 703,934 354,190 201.27%

Commissions 958,000 958,000 259,884 746,390 (211,610) 77.91%

Foster care 800,000 800,000 42,953 356,912 (443,088) 44.61%

Other charges for services 2,386,858 2,484,231 502,255 2,059,411 (424,820) 82.90%

Other revenue - - 500 658 658 100.00%

Investment income 2,150,000 2,150,000 199,479 314,844 (1,835,156) 14.64%

Inter departmental charges

Indirect cost allocation 8,410,734 8,410,734 714,678 3,443,623 (4,967,111) 40.94%

Fines and forfeitures 851,000 851,000 193,297 712,788 (138,212) 83.76%

Other revenue 92,000 92,968 4,053 15,482 (77,486) 16.65%

Prior Year Fund Balance 13,577,708 9,164,750 - - (9,164,750) 0.00%

Operating transfers in 26,308,840 26,279,840 24,978,138 24,998,138 (1,281,702) 95.12%

198,059,012$ 199,249,339$ 50,915,866$ 181,755,510$ (17,493,829)$ 91.22%



Quarterly Revenue Report


14







Rents -$ -$ -$ 1,500$ 1,500$ 100.00%

Commissions 40,000 40,000 11,598 46,300 6,300 115.75%

Other charges for services 125,000 125,000 31,250 125,000 - 100.00%

Operating transfers in 97,507 97,507 - - (97,507) 0.00%

262,507$ 262,507$ 42,848$ 172,800$ (89,707)$ 65.83%



Licenses and permits 948,501$ 948,501$ 43,362$ 990,702$ 42,201$ 104.45%

Federal grants - 2,421,022 - - (2,421,022) 0.00%

State grants 1,978,553 2,062,893 493,534 2,115,328 52,435 102.54%


Certified copies 44,700 44,700 11,322 39,802 (4,898) 89.04%


Other administrative services 80,000 80,000 995 28,936 (51,064) 36.17%

Other revenue 34,000 34,000 6,320 31,048 (2,952) 91.32%

Medicare/medicaid 569,312 569,312 35,316 708,957 139,645 124.53%


Indirect cost allocation 208,178 208,178 2,286 215,742 7,564 103.63%

Fines and forfeitures 9,000 9,000 5,100 16,704 7,704 185.60%

Other revenue 5,000 5,500 2,603 16,005 10,505 291.00%

Prior Year Fund Bal 86,000 226,750 - - (226,750) 0.00%

Operating transfers in 13,676,764 13,676,764 - - (13,676,764) 0.00%

19,244,156$ 21,890,768$ 937,817$ 5,372,725$ (16,518,043)$ 24.54%

Fund: Freedom Hill Park (December 31 Year-End)

Fund: Health Department (December 31 Year-End)

15







Other Sheriff services -$ -$ -$ 191$ 191$ 100.00%


Other administrative services 30,000 30,000 23,648 33,245 3,245 110.82%

Medicare/medicaid 18,868,894 18,868,894 1,767,713 16,903,381 (1,965,513) 89.58%



22,834,441$ 22,834,441$ 2,016,478$ 19,385,787$ (3,448,654)$ 84.90%



Charges for services 87,267$ 87,267$ 800$ 64,637$ (22,630)$ 74.07%



1,160,356$ 1,160,356$ 800$ 64,637$ (1,095,719)$ 5.57%

Fund: Research and Reference Center (December 31 Year-End)

Fund: Martha T Berry (December 31 Year-End)

16






Federal grants 106,454$ 116,862$ 28,713$ 128,362$ 11,500$ 109.84%


Charges for services 227,213 227,213 12 48,350 (178,863) 21.28%

In-Kind Revenue 114,307 114,307 - - (114,307) 0.00%

Other revenue 239,957 239,957 38,931 229,686 (10,271) 95.72%

Prior Year Fund Bal - 28,484 - - (28,484) 0.00%


1,711,542$ 1,750,434$ 67,656$ 406,398$ (1,344,036)$ 23.22%



Taxes

Property taxes 1,100,870$ 1,100,870$ 87,588$ 1,196,659$ 95,789$ 108.70%

Charges for services - - 4,683 18,295 18,295 100.00%

1,100,870$ 1,100,870$ 92,271$ 1,214,954$ 114,084$ 110.36%

Fund: Senior Citizens Servcies (December 31 Year-End)

Fund: Veterans' Affairs (December 31 Year-End)

17






State grants 60,000$ 60,000$ -$ -$ (60,000)$ 0.00%

Charges for services - - 897 897 897 100.00%


256,595$ 256,595$ 897$ 897$ (255,698)$ 0.35%



Federal grants 177,000$ 177,000$ 26,676$ 26,676$ (150,324)$ 15.07%

State grants 10,449,756 10,449,756 - - (10,449,756) 0.00%

Charges for services 872,500 872,500 125,426 125,426 (747,074) 14.38%

Other revenue - - 974 974 974 100.00%

Prior Year Fund Balance - 12,363 - - (12,363) 0.00%


26,049,016$ 26,061,379$ 153,076$ 153,076$ (25,908,303)$ 0.59%



State grants 1,025,541$ 1,025,541$ 98,135$ 98,135$ (927,406)$ 9.57%


1,320,654$ 1,320,654$ 98,135$ 98,135$ (1,222,519)$ 7.43%

Fund: Community Corrections (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Child Care Fund (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Adult Drug Court (Sep 30 Year End)

18






Federal grants 365,516$ 435,516$ -$ -$ (435,516)$ 0.00%

State grants 29,569,231 29,569,231 - - (29,569,231) 0.00%


Other charges for services 8,468 8,468 1,132 1,132 (7,336) 13.37%

Medicare/medicaid 164,317,475 164,317,475 38,879 38,879 (164,278,596) 0.02%


Indirect cost allocation 52,666 52,666 - - (52,666) 0.00%

Other revenue 57,947 57,947 4,939 4,939 (53,008) 8.52%


198,280,985$ 198,350,985$ 44,950$ 44,950$ (198,306,035)$ 0.02%



Federal grants 10,172,895$ 10,251,530$ 2,209,515$ 2,209,515$ (8,042,015)$ 21.55%

State grants 807,562 807,562 140,713 140,713 (666,849) 17.42%

Charges for services 4,106,944 4,154,212 589,191 589,191 (3,565,021) 14.18%

Other revenue 169,000 186,245 (9,609) (9,609) (195,854) -5.16%

Prior Year Fund Balance 197,617 197,617 - - (197,617) 0.00%

Operating transfers in 1,086,921 1,086,921 21,390 21,390 (1,065,531) 1.97%

16,540,939$ 16,684,087$ 2,951,200$ 2,951,200$ (13,732,887)$ 17.69%

Fund: Community Mental Health (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Community Services (Sep 30 Year End)

19






Federal grants 6,750,000$ 6,750,000$ 242,255$ 242,255$ (6,507,745)$ 3.59%

State grants 19,550 19,550 161,639 161,639 142,089 826.80%

Charges for services 751,000 751,000 163,827 163,827 (587,173) 21.81%

Other revenue - - 128 128 128 100.00%

Investment income - - 20 20 20 100.00%


10,645,674$ 10,645,674$ 567,869$ 567,869$ (10,077,805)$ 5.33%



Federal grants 170,838$ 170,838$ (5,677)$ (5,677)$ (176,515)$ -3.32%

State grants 2,868,137 3,020,370 720,749 720,749 (2,299,621) 23.86%


Medicare/medicaid 389,346 389,346 6,947 6,947 (382,399) 1.78%

Other charges for services 60,515 60,515 1,382 1,382 (59,133) 2.28%

Other revenue 7,500 7,500 1,623 1,623 (5,877) 21.64%


4,030,902$ 4,183,135$ 725,024$ 725,024$ (3,458,111)$ 17.33%



Federal grants 1,238,598$ 1,238,598$ 30,712$ 30,712$ (1,207,886)$ 2.48%

State grants 65,547 65,547 - - (65,547) 0.00%

Other revenue - - 27 27 27 100.00%


2,164,272$ 2,164,272$ 30,739$ 30,739$ (2,133,533)$ 1.42%

Fund: Prosecuting Attorney Grants (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Friend of the Court (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Health Grants (Sep 30 Year End)

20






Licenses & permits 506,200$ 506,200$ 94,559$ 94,559$ (411,641)$ 18.68%

Federal grants 28,705,933 28,705,933 4,109,420 4,109,420 (24,596,513) 14.32%

State grants 48,779,711 48,779,711 10,342,389 10,342,389 (38,437,322) 21.20%

Charges for services 1,816,461 1,816,461 263,852 263,852 (1,552,609) 14.53%

Investment income 177,924 177,924 41,707 41,707 (136,217) 23.44%


Prior Year Fund Balance 8,763,523 8,817,469 - - (8,817,469) 0.00%

88,999,752$ 89,053,698$ 14,851,927$ 14,851,927$ (74,201,771)$ 16.68%



Federal grants 71,539$ 71,539$ 19,706$ 19,706$ (51,833)$ 27.55%

State grants 1,045,014 1,045,014 - - (1,045,014) 0.00%

Charges for services 241,991 241,991 - - (241,991) 0.00%

Fines and forfeitures 30,000 30,000 1,431 1,431 (28,569) 4.77%


2,161,622$ 2,161,622$ 21,137$ 21,137$ (2,140,485)$ 0.98%



State grants 3,783,639$ 3,783,639$ -$ -$ (3,783,639)$ 0.00%


Medicare/medicaid 3,735,357 3,735,357 - - (3,735,357) 0.00%

Prior Year Fund Balance 433,376 433,376 - - (433,376) 0.00%


9,032,603$ 9,032,603$ -$ -$ (9,032,603)$ 0.00%

Fund: Sheriff Grants (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Substance Abuse (Sep 30 Year End)

Fund: Roads (Sep 30 Year End)

21

RESOLUTION NO. _____________ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE:__________________ AGENDA ITEM:______________________________ MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO receive and file the report by ADG Eco and Energy Advisement Group INTRODUCED BY: Don Brown, Chair, Finance Committee

COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE Finance 1-25-12

22

AAADDDGGG EEEcccooo &&& EEEnnneeerrrgggyyy AAAdddvvviiissseeemmmeeennnttt GGGrrrooouuuppp

818.597.9494 t www.ArchitecturalDetailGroup.com www.GreenHotelLighting.com Newport Beach Agoura Hills Myrtle Beach

Advisory Board of Directors Gerald Olesker, Dipl. Arch. CEO/ founder Alvin Greene Fmr. Chair L.A. Housing Authority Ron Means Fmr. President JBL Deam Roys, Pres. Roys Assoc. Board ACORE Kimber Sax, J.D. Jewish Journal Media, ret. Jamie Rinehart, M.B.A. Grant Writer & Administrator Travis Abeyta, EEL Environmental Scientist Jeff Kleid, Elite Risk Services Pablo Wolf, Dipl. Arch. LEED AP David Allen, NEFLDA Business Development RED Architectural Detail Group, Inc a collaborative group enhancing the built environment's needs through positive relationships Awards; SBCA Best of Business Nominated VEA Economic Engine NEFLDA charter member

October 1, 2011 Re: Municipality or Public Facility - Perspective Fund Recipient Dear Perspective Fund Recipient, To date Architectural Detail Group, Inc. parent Company to ADG Eco has developed a business plan that creates a specific return for Energy users in need of instant reduction to power consumption and deferment of maintenance. Following our Pilot program -RED a Utility Saving Company Program is looking for utility users to participate in a new Multi- million dollar program fund. This fund will allow for the installation of ADG Eco friendly lighting products into school districts, colleges, government buildings, and established municipalities. No cost for product. In exchange, the customers will agree to pay a secondary Utility Savings Company Program for the savings in Energy at a Static or fixed rate, RED Utility Company will bill the customer for eighty percent of the calculated savings generated by the lighting products for a period of seven years. This will allow the customer to install the energy efficient lighting products with no money out of pocket. (Like a cell phone or cable company or Rolls Royce Aircraft Engines providing the equipment free and a monthly service charge for use of the program.) The RED program pays for itself over a set period short term with future savings of 100%.. Solar and other programs use typical PPA’s to generate revenue or savings for the customer. Reducing consumption at the source, ADG Eco LIGHTING, is stronger and has a quicker more viable pay back for all parties participating. Public facilities are finding it next to impossible to get funding for special projects that reduce energy and defer maintenance periods. We provide options. ADG Eco knows that our plan is unique and a strong option for facilities’ CFOs and COOs to take advantage of energy efficient technology. Please feel free to direct any questions or comments to me and return one page application. Best, Gerald Olesker CEO – Director of Government Services

23

Utility Savings Program - Credit Application for On- Bill Financing

Utility User (Full Legal Name)

Federal Tax ID #

Street Address

City, State, and Zip

Dept. Using the Equipment

Customer Contact Invoices to be sent to:

Title Contact

Phone and Fax No. Department

e-mail address Street Address

City, State, and Zip

Contract Signer Phone and Fax No.

Title e-mail address

Phone and Fax No. Special Instructions

e-mail address Funding Amount

1. Equipment Description:American Made ADG Eco energy reduction Lighting products/ hard wired components/ induction light/ light fixtures

the energy used 50-90% against the utility bill as a General Expense.

Upgrade

Source of funds for Date of most recent Audited Financial Statement:

proposed payments:

General Fund _____ Fiscal Year End:

Other (provide detail) _______ and used as a deferment from Utility Bill with new Utility Savings Program on Bill financing

Self Insured? General Liability Coverage Limits: $______________

Submitted by (Name): Title:

Signature: Date:

David Allen [email protected] Utility Program Provider for ADG Eco Lighting Products Direct: 866.584.9282 x 107 29397 Agoura Road# 110 Fax: 818.597.9696Agoura Hills, CA 91301

Please note that we do require the copies of your audited annual financial statements in order to process your request.

5. Is the new equipment replacement, an upgrade or additional to the department:

6. If replacement or upgrade, what is the age of the existing equipment:

10. Have you ever defaulted or non-appropriated on a lease or bond obligation?

7. If you're upgrading existing equipment, is the existing equipment paid off:

Fund Balance:

$_________________

As of _________________

If so provide detail.

9. Will any loan or grant monies be directly used to make the payments?

8. Have funds been appropriated for the payments due on the proposed financing during the current budgetary period?

2. What is the purpose of the proposed equipment acquisition:to reduce overall Consumable products i.e. replacement of lights over an extended 100,000 hour period while reducing

3. Why is the equipment essential:equipment is essential to daily operations and facility must replace older light fixtures with these energy efficient significantly

fixtures that defer maintenance 100,000 hours and lower energy bills 4. What department is using the equipment:

So that we may begin our credit review process, please email or fax this application, along with your equipment quote (bill of materials) and the signed financing proposal, to us.Please mail or email the 2 most recent copies of your Audited Annual Financial Statements, plus a copy of this year's budget, to:

General Liability Insurance Coverage limits in the amount of $1 Million is required. If applicable, automobile liability coverage of $3 million required.

Is the Utility customer or lessee a member of a managed risk pool? _______ If yes please provide the name and coverage amounts below.

If the Utility Customers a structured lessee has additional commercial insurance coverage please provide coverage limits.

AB# 110-362-000

Phone: 866.584.9282 x 107 Agent ID# Lester S. RED Utility Savings Company Program ADG Eco American Made Fixture Dealer #_____

Financing Application State & Local Government Customers

copyright 5.2011 Page 1 Finance Municipal Credit App 2011

24

www.adgEcoLP.com Call for a Reseller in your state 818 597 9494

ADG Eco Lighting Products Induction Case Study 122010

Northwest C

ommun

ity Hospital

Green

cast Services, In

c. In

staller /D

ealer

Therapy Pool Lighting Replacement & Retrofit

“Good news, the installation at NCH Wellness Center has gone well. Most importantly the client is very happy with the outcome”

25

Paradigm Shift

Reasonable 21st Century solutions Better quality illumination Less Energy used Deferred maintenance State and Federal Compliance DOE Recognized technology

What should you do? Actively engage with an Eco Advisement Group. Review some of our case studies Impact to SMUSD Paradigm Shift L.A. Talk Radio interview with our CEO ADG Mini White Paper LED vs. induction Valley Economic Alliance Impact Study Know that Lighting your facility can hog as much as 25%‐45% of your power bill

ADG Eco Lighting Products ADG Eco & Energy Advisement Group

Proudly serving Institutions

with an experienced team

Collaborations of our Team with yours produces

quality results, well manufactured products

and some of the best solutions.

ADG experts have been manufacturing for 3 generations

ADG Team members will be keyed

into your needs ADG Manufactured solutions ‐

Save you Money

Case Study 122010 64% energy Savings Daily 20 Years deferred Maintenance

Typical Lamp Lifespan of Commercial/Industrial Lighting Types

10,000

24,000

25,000

55,000

100,000

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

Metal Halide

Mercury Vapor

High Pressure Sodium

High Power LEDs

ADG ECO Induction Lamps

Burn Time (Hours)

Typical Lamp Lifespan of Commercial/Industrial Lighting Types

10,000

24,000

25,000

55,000

100,000

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

Metal Halide

Mercury Vapor

High Pressure Sodium

High Power LEDs

ADG ECO Induction Lamps

Burn Time (Hours)

26

\\ I. I ( . ( 1 1\1 I T ( )

S /\ 1"1' Ll\ K E C~I"TY

ADG Eco lighting Products Induction Case Study 112010 "The City Government did it right -Through a bid process they awarded the project to a rea' American Lighting Manufacturer.

To many people that have entered the Induction lighting market import fixtures-Yuck, We Make Our Fixtures here in the USA- Truly"

All Induction lighting at City Hall Retrofit & Restoration 000'"'

www.GreenHotelllghting.com Call for a Reseller in your state 8185979494 LIGHTING PRODUCTS

27

cbedar

Typewritten Text

Distributed 1-25-12

cbedar

Typewritten Text

Paradigm Shift ADG Eco Lighting Products Reasonable 21st Century solutionsADG Eco & Energy Advisement Group Better quality illumination I:Proudly serving Institutions Less Energy used

with an experienced team. Deferred maintenance State and Federal Compliance

The City Replaced & Restored Hundreds DOE Recognized technology

of inside / outside Metal Halide Light fixtures with Solution Based manufactured Induction Lighting Kits by ADG Eco.

ADG created specialty housings and ret- . ,rofits for the installer. The engineered II

kits save 60% of the installer's time.

ADG Manufactured Solutions City of Salt Lake is at a 50% savings

IClose to $40,000 annually I

65%

"""..

1-,,,,-,,,,-'1"',,,-,,·-,--,,-----,..,

~"'" ".... '

",.", F1,",

.."'.~ "t.'

"'" ••••.-co",

,".,."".,,-~-

>nuco I.'."~.l....

OperClition Cosl Savings .:ti'I,OOO

Retro-fil mounting Instrucri()fls '~

!·jRTT JU:.IIOI I~ LXfY/"J,\r; Rl.LRA\iJ H ILL tiT

1. mount both bulbs and heatsink to \'00.000 aluminum moonting bracket

2connect bracket to erisling holes using existing screws"":: _~_~ __I I•=====p=~ 3. mount both ballasts !

(using provided screw!» ,'" Project Costs (Year 1) 10 ballast brackets ~

-------------~-------

4. stack brackets and connect to existing holes using existing screws

\~'I,J05)

ik<nn':,) ~ iI "" "", / ' rhi' ')]0) _ __. J

28

ADGEco ~.tSUlting Produc·t~..~nduction

e\s:@:Study 05201'r, _!.,~' ,

~. ~ '.

",~, " ,.,

' I .~.',-~_ I., \ ' .•~., ~'(;.,. ~ I "'I (-,I, L - ' I ~ .", . I--, i ,. •.•• -,, ..J " '"\' \ . ' ' ~ '-, ~ -- '. - '~ '- , '--_/ -- '-..-. ,

000 www.adgEcoLP.com Call for an ADG Eco Dealer in your slate 8185979494 . LIGHTIHGPRODUC

29

The USAF did it right J e~warded the project to a real American Li htin_ Manufacturer.

100 Years of man f cturing history

(J) 100,000 houfs of lamp life

The USAF Base Replaced multiples of Operation Cost Savings

old metal halide lights with ADG Eco High Performance Induction Lights. 1250,000

ADG created specialty units to meet the \t00,000

demand of a classified location - this is SftJ,OO~SAle's Integrated Solution.

$1)5,176

.1)0.000ADG Manufactured Solutions:USAF is at a SO% savings

$50,000

1 Close to $256 saved per unit annually iClassified use-average kwh .12 =

Year [)

400

· Current Fixture Wattage wi Ballast

1. Current Fil(ture Watt<lge

480

155· New fixture Wattage wi Ba/last

o· Additional Watts Saved.

325· Total Watts S"ved per Fixture

50 · # of Fixtures Installing

· , of Fixtures to Removing

50 16,250

I 1. Tatoll Power Saved /kWI Every Hour

10. Total Energy Saved [Watts)

16,3

1212. Hours of Use per Day

73. Days 01 Use per Week1

i 14. Weeks of Use per Year 52 5.91515. Energy Saved per Month (kWh)

70.98016. Energy Saved per Year (kWh)

0.0017. Energy Demand Charge Per kW

0.12018. Energy Cost per Kilowatt (,cents)·

$8.51819. Energy Cost Savings per Year

$2,000O. Maintenance Savings per Year

$10,5181. Total SaVings Per Year

·0 Z

O,·"no1((:,':._o~ U:;. ~_..

.>LIGHTING PRODU CTS - ," IL "e'" ",,: ,,,',, -Ill, :" .. ",.,." ~

L

30

Induction Light Retrofit 275 w MH to 100 w ADG Eco induction

Exclusive Manufactured Solution Tailored to Each Need

31

--

ADG Eco Lighting Products Induction Case Study 092009 Oak Park Unified School District recently won a coveted Golden Bell award for its envimnmental awareness The California School Boards Assoc chose lhe Oak Park district as its 2010 Golden Bell winner in the Sustainable, Renewable, Energy and Resource Efficient category

Date: August3 2008 Location or Con.. id....atian:

park'rg Kll retrof,j Explaniltlon Value

1 Com pUle tile 10Iai power

11".,lowarrs. ~WI S3VMj", H)~

U!ie a value,f no Ale or Outside o 1.9::'

Energy sa .... ng Eca 45 Lo;Jhtmg Products 6 ~,;-O

1000 ~O

2. Computl! the 10lai anetgy 12 (Kilowatt Hours. kWh) JIOayed

annually by perfolmln~ tn,s

UPllrade

3. Compute the total energy

~J ~lf,

4. Simple PaybacK 51;C .J00

'(Energy ROil S4!5{;1.OS

~. Rate of Rlllurn IROfq

6 paCjJe 2 contain" complete ROI 'nformallon

Addilion" HO~5:

approved I:"f (chert r<lrTre)

R"pla~"mI!'''l Lamp \N3I[a~e

lNans 5",e" per Lamp

Ale Savings 1t3 orWarrs S~v".d per L"~

W311S Saved per Lamp Inclu61ng ;"Ie

~ 01 Lamps 10 Replace

TOl1ll Energy Saved (W311~1 "b1.3lle<J Dy sehoul

K,loW3tl Conv"'SJon rna,nteIlC€ replace QUi

Hour~ 04 Use ~<" D"v reflector~ i1ncl II J>'i~

D~y~ or VM per Wee~ may be nee-dl>cJ WeN:s d l)~~ per Year

Tnt:ll Eoerg. ~,ed pel Y"aT (KWn,

marrll.'S "l-Jcr, hl-;Jncr Tr:>ti:ll Malnlenanr;~

''''~'I'ngsl\,r

;14~ 63

lo~'"1 Cost of Ll9~lmg up;':I<le ,.e i~"',.! c<>"~;I,,,",

TOI<lI Energy COS! S<o""qs IX'f i ~¥ ."elud,ng Ma,m

S.mple Payback I,n Yea's! see ~etGain. n ROI

10:"1,,, 0\ Relu," (ro %)

True V~I~" R~'urn

;. "

n

"t']!

, ,

, Case Study

092009

64% energy Savings Nightly

20 Years deferred

MaintenanceL

www.adgEcoLP.com Call for a Reseller in your state 818 597 9494

32

RESOLUTION NO.

FULL BOARD MEETING DATE:

AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF ALOIA & ASSOCIATES, P.C. TO PROVIDE LEGAL SERVICES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ROADS IN LITIGATION INVOLVING REAL PROPERTY INTRODUCED BY: CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE Pursuant to the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of Aloia & Associates, P.C. to represent the Department of Roads in matters concerning obtaining easements and rights of way for completion of road projects, the review and approval of right of way dedications and platting of roadways throughout the County and the representation of he County Department of Roads in litigation involving condemnation of real property. Mr. Aloia has been representing the former Road Commission and now the Department of Roads since 2001. Mr. Aloia comes highly recommended to continue to do this work from the Director of the Department of Roads, Mr. Bob Hoepfner, as well as the County Executive’s Office. COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE FINANCE COMMITTEE – 1/25/12

33

RESOLUTION NO.


AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF CUMMINGS McCLOREY DAVIS & ACHO PLC TO REPRESENT MACOMB COUNTY IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED EDWARD KORALEWSKI VS. MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT , ET AL WHICH IS PENDING IN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INTRODUCED BY: CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE Pursuant to the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of Cummings McClorey Davis & Acho PLC to represent the County in the above lawsuit. Plaintiff has filed a lawsuit alleging that he was maliciously prosecuted for resisting arrest. He was bitten by a member of the K-9 Unit during his arrest and claims excessive force was used. The law firm of Cummings McClorey Davis & Acho PLC has represented numerous municipalities throughout the Southeast Michigan and Timothy Ferrand of that law firm has represented the County successfully in a number of lawsuits over the last few years. Mr. Ferrand has particular expertise in the areas of alleged civil rights violations, police brutality claims, i.e., excessive force and false arrest. COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE FINANCE COMMITTEE – 1/25/12

34

RESOLUTION NO.


AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF KITCH, DRUTCHAS, WAGNER, VALITUTTI & SHERBROOK TO REPRESENT THE COUNTY DEFENDANTS IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED SHARON RIX, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY LEACH V MACOMB COUNTY, ET AL WHICH IS PENDING IN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INTRODUCED BY: CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE Pursuant to the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of Kitch, Drutchas, Wagner, Valitutti & Sherbrook to represent the County and County Defendants in the above lawsuit. The decedent who is being represented in this matter was a client of Macomb County Community Mental Health. On February 10, 2008, Mr. Leach passed away in the hospital The Plaintiff is suing the County of Macomb, Macomb County Community Mental Health and a division of Mental Health entitled Specialized Residential Services for alleged malpractice and malpractice in the care of Mr. Leach. The Kitch Law Firm’s principal office is located in Detroit and also has offices in the City of Mt. Clemens, was founded originally as a medical malpractice law firm and has branched out to other areas of the law but medical malpractice continues to be one of their chief fortes. The attorney who will be in charge of this file, Mr. Ralph Valitutti, is a principal in the law firm and has extensive trial experience in medical malpractice defense. Included within his medical malpractice expertise is psychiatric malpractice. The Kitch Law Firm therefore will be able to defend this case based upon not only the allegations of failure to provide proper treatment, but also in the area of governmental immunity because of their past experience in representing the County in other actions. COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE FINANCE COMMITTEE – 1/25/12

35

RESOLUTION NO.


AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF McCONAGHY & NYOVICH TO REPRESENT THE COUNTY IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED MACOMB COUNTY PROFESSIONAL DEPUTY SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION VS COUNTY OF MACOMB WHICH IS PENDING IN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INTRODUCED BY: CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE Pursuant to the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of McConaghy & Nyovich to represent the County in the above lawsuit pending in Federal District Court. Macomb County Professional Deputy Sheriffs Association filed a Complaint in Macomb County Circuit Court asking for an injunction against the County which would prevent the County from deducting the cost of health care provided to members of the MCPDSA. As you may recall, the state limits the amount that a public employer may pay for the cost of heath care insurance for its employees. The health care cost for the MCPDSA members exceed those limits. The County is merely attempted to comply with the requirements of the state law. The law firm of McConaghy & Nyovich and in particularly Tim McConaghy has been involved in the negotiations concerning the MCPDSA and are familiar with the statues and issues involved. They have represented the County in other labor matters over the years. It is requested that the Board of Commissioners concur in this appointment. Should you have any questions regarding the above lawsuit, please feel free to contact our office. COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE FINANCE COMMITTEE – 1/25/12

36

RESOLUTION NO.


AGENDA ITEM: MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO: CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF PLUNKETT COONEY TO REPRESENT THE COUNTY DEFENDANTS IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED JEFFREY LIMING VS MACOMB COUNTY, ET AL WHICH IS PENDING IN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT INTRODUCED BY: CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE Pursuant to the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of Plunkett Cooney PC to represent the County Defendants in the above lawsuit pending in Federal District Court. Plaintiff is an individual who alleges that he was wrongfully placed into custody by our deputies who were responding to a domestic violence call at the Plaintiff’s home. Because of the Plaintiff’s state of mind, the Plaintiff was transported to a hospital and in effect was never under arrest. He was placed into custody pursuant to actions as permitted under state law which allows police officers to place a person into protective custody and transport individuals to a preadmission screening unit for examination. Part of the Complaint is that excessive force was used against the Plaintiff during what he alleges was an arrest. Plaintiff also claims that being placed into custody was deprivation of his civil rights as well as a violation of Michigan Persons With Disabilities Civil Rights Act. The law firm of Plunkett Cooney has specialized over the years in representing municipalities and particularly police officers in these types of actions. Mr. Peter Peacock of Plunkett Cooney’s Mt. Clemens’ Office will be principally in charge of this case. Should you have any questions regarding the above lawsuit, please feel free to contact our office. COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE FINANCE COMMITTEE – 1/25/12

37

RESOLUTION NO. _____________ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE:__________________ AGENDA ITEM:______________________________ MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO Approve one-year contract extension with Sound Counseling to provide professional and therapeutic services at the Juvenile Justice Center from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012. Forward to the Finance Committee.

INTRODUCED BY Commissioner Phillip DiMaria, Chair, Justice and Public Safety Committee COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE JPS Committee 01-24-12

38

cbedar

Typewritten Text

Finance 1-25-12

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

Official Proclamation Of the Board of Commissioners


A Proclamation Honoring Gordon R. Fuerstenau On His Retirement from the City of St. Clair Shores

Commissioner Don Brown,

On Behalf of the Board of Commissioners, Offers the Following Proclamation:

Whereas, public service with sincerity, honesty and devotion and a genuine commitment

to activities and projects that generate improvement and betterment in the quality of life for all people is an aspiration and dream sought by many, but seldom achieved or fulfilled; and

Whereas, the aforesaid attributes aptly describe Gordon R. Fuerstenau who has unselfishly given of his time, energy and undaunted efforts to the community; and

Whereas, Gordon R. Fuerstenau has served the residents of Richmond Township since his election in 1984; first for eighteen years as Township Clerk and as Township Supervisor from December 2002 through November 2011; and

Whereas, Gordon R. Fuerstenau along with his wife and other residents led the fight to

prevent a landfill from opening in the Township in the early ‘80s; and Whereas, Gordon R. Fuerstenau is a lifelong resident of Richmond. He graduated from Michigan State University in 1951 with a degree in Agricultural Management. Gordon was a dairy farmer and still farms and produces hay, corn and soy beans. In 1966 he and his wife were the Outstanding Young Dairy Couple of Michigan Milk Producers. He is very active in his community, serving as a member of the Farm Bureau, Director of Greenstone Farm Credit Services, a member of the Michigan Milk Producers, Director of Macomb County Soil Conservation, President of Richmond Farmers for fifteen years and Chairman of Richmond Local Michigan Animal Breeders Association for twenty-five years; and

Whereas, it is fitting and proper that public recognition be given to this outstanding individual for his various contributions to agriculture and farming in Macomb County and for his years of public service to the residents of Richmond Township.

Now, Therefore, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners, speaking for and on behalf of all county residents as follows:

I

That By These Presents, the Macomb County Board of Commissioners publicly acknowledges and expresses congratulations to Gordon R. Fuerstenau on the occasion of his retirement as the Supervisor of the Township of Richmond and wishes him many years of relaxation and enjoyment.

II

Be It Further Resolved that a suitable copy of this Proclamation be presented to Gordon R. Fuerstenau in testimony of the high esteem in which he is held by the Board of Commissioners.

50

RESOLUTION NO.


AGENDA ITEM:

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN

RESOLUTION TO Approve increases, per attached documents, to the MSU Extension 2012 grant –

funded budget, which includes rolling forward 2011 fund balances and/or receiving additional 2012

revenue from the following funds :

• General Child Care

• General Housing

• General Extension

• General Youth Development

• Environmental Education

• Great Lakes Education Program (GLEP)

• National Foreclosure Mitigation Counseling (NFMC) Round Two and Round 5

• Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA) Foreclosure

INTRODUCED BY:

COMMITTEE MEETING DATE

Economic Development 1/25/12

51

cbedar

Typewritten Text

cbedar

Typewritten Text

Distributed/Added to Agenda 1-25-12

cbedar

Typewritten Text

Finance 1-25-12

cbedar

Typewritten Text

APPROVED

cbedar

Typewritten Text

Commissioners James Carabelli and David Flynn, Co-Chairs, Economic Development Committee

MSU EXTENSION

21885 Dunham RdVerkuilen Bldg, Suite 12

Clinton Twp, MI 48036

Phone: 586-469-5180Fax: 586-469-6948

www.msue.msu.edu

Date: January 9, 2012

To: Mark Deldin, Deputy County Executive

From: Marie Ruemenapp, District Coordinator

Re: 2012 Budget Adjustments

Macomb MSU Extension is requesting a routine budget adjustment to roll forward the 2011 fund balances discussed below. The budget adjustments include $306,244.08 of Fund Balance Rollover, $26,700 of Federal Revenue, $13,000 of Reimbursement-Other and $160,000 of Private Revenue for a total Budget Adjustment of $505,944.08.

General Childcare:

A fund balance identified as "General Childcare" has accrued because revenue for a number of childcare grants over multiple years was based on fixed fees per unit of service, not on reimbursement for actual expenditures. Careful stewardship by MSUE staff has allowed a fund balance to build up. The General Childcare Fund Balance will be utilized in the future toward the support of the full time Coordinator and part time Account Clerk IV, as well as programming expenses. The General fund is not, and will not be charged for any expenses incurred that are related to childcare training. The budget adjustment for General Childcare consists of $66,125.03 of Fund Balance, $6,700 of Federal Revenue and $3,000 of Reimbursement-Other for a total budget adjustment of $75,825.03.

General Housing:

The General Housing funds results from a combination of donations from financial institutions, CDBG funds and fee-for-service related to Habitat for Humanity counseling. General Housing funds will support expansion into new home and community energy conservation/greening programs, as well as other expenses not budgeted for in the General Fund.

The budget adjustment for General Housing consists of $35,738.84 of Fund Balance and $10,000 of Private Revenue for a total budget adjustment of $45,738.84.

General Extension:

This fund balance resulted from funds collected over the years for various educational programs and special projects that MSUE facilitated. In the future, these funds will support a part time Account Clerk IV, as well as other minor miscellaneous expenses not budgeted for in the General Fund.

The budget adjustment for General Extension consists of $70,283.03 of Fund Balance and $10,000 of Reimbursement-Other for a total budget adjustment of $80,283.03.

52

2012 Budget Adjustments Page 2

General Youth Development:

The General Youth Fund Balance was created because revenue from a number of youth training and mentoring grants was based on fixed fees per unit of service and MSUE was able to fulfill the contract requirements at a cost lower than the revenue received. The funds will be expensed to continue 4H youth development, training and mentoring programs as well as partially supporting a grant-funded part-time Account Clerk IV. The budget adjustment for General Youth Development consists of $$42,833.26 of Fund Balance. Environmental Education: The original dollars came from a contract MSUE received to provide education programs to community schools. These funds will continue to be used to supplement environmental education programs in the county not covered by other sources. The budget adjustment for Environmental Education consists of $12,873 of Fund Balance.

Great Lakes Education Program (GLEP):

These funds originate from schools that participate in the GLEP program. Each class is charged the same dollar amount to participate. In addition to GLEP, these funds are used to cover program related expenses for the Water Conservation Education Program and the new Blue Economy including salary and fringe for a Program Instructor and partial funding for a grant-funded part-time Account Clerk IV.

The budget adjustment for GLEP consists of $10,088.09 of Fund Balance.

National Foreclosure Mitigation Counseling (NFMC) Round 2 and Round 5:

Since 2008, MSUE has served county residents by providing foreclosure prevention education and counseling services. The funding comes through annual fee –for- service contracts with the National Foreclosure Mitigation Counseling Program (NFMC) in conjunction with the Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA). The fund balances will be used to continue ongoing counseling and program expenses for Macomb County residents facing foreclosure. A part-time Account Clerk IV will be partially supported by the NFMC grants. General Fund dollars are not used to support MSUE’s foreclosure prevention education programs

Additionally, in 2012, MSHDA will release funds to be used for Round 5 Foreclosure counseling and Macomb County is anticipated to receive $20,000 of this funding.

The budget adjustment for NFMC Round 2 and Round 5 consists of $68,302.83 of Fund Balance in Round 2 and $20,000 of Federal Revenue in Round 5.

Michigan State Housing Department Agency (MSHDA) Foreclosure:

Since 2008 MSUE has served as a contractor to provide education and counseling services for Macomb County residents in the areas of financial, housing and foreclosure prevention. The education and counseling is conducted by MSU Extension MSHDA-certified staff. Education and counseling services are billed to MSHDA based on the services rendered to the client and reimbursed by MSHDA on a fee-for-service basis. These funds support four part- time MSHDA counselors as well as a grant-funded part-time Account Clerk IV.

The budget adjustment for MSHDA Foreclosure consists of $150,000 of Private Revenue.

Cc: Steven C. Gold, MPH Peter Provenzano, Director of Finance

53

RESOLUTION NO. _____________ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE:__________________ AGENDA ITEM:______________________________ MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO approve increases in budget revenues and expenses in the amount of $644.66 which is 2011 fund balance roll forward for the Board of Commissioners Green Schools Program INTRODUCED BY: Don Brown, Chair, Finance Committee This balance resulted from unused sponsorship funds that were donated in 2011. Funds are used to facilitate the Green Schools Program and the purchase of the flags and patches that are awarded to participating schools. COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE Distributed/Added to Agenda 1-25-11 Finance 1-25-12

54

Report: GLBOYTD1

Fund '01

Key: 10110110

Y/E: DEC

General Fund

Board Office Programs

Macomb County, Michigan Budget to Actual Report ey Org Key

YTD THRU 12/311;1011

Fiscal Year:

Fiscal Period:

2(111

"

Obje~1 Description

Revenue Account'

60799 FEES-OTHER

67501 DONATIONS·PRIVATE SOURCES

Total Ch;ugee for Services

Adoptell

BUdget

0.00

0.00

000

Final

Budget

0.00

0.00

a.oll

Encumbered

000

0.00

<LOn

2011

Actual

0.00

656.26

fiS/I.2f\

Variance

000

65828

-------.fi5R.2/1

% Utilized

100,00 %

10000 %

100.00 %

67699 CONTRIB FROM-OTHER PROGRAMS

Total Contrib From Other Fund5

0.00

000

2,000,00

200000

0,00

000

2,000,00

2000 00

0.00

000

100.00 0/0

100.00 %

Total Revenue Accounts 000 2,000,00 0.00 2,658.26 658.28 13291 %

ElCpense Account'

95101 APPROP-OLOER AMERICAN FEST

95110 APPROP-LEGISLATIVE EXP

95137 APPROP-VOLUNTEER RECOGNITN PGM

95149 APPROP·STUOENT GOVT DAY

95159 APPROP-GREEN SCHOOLS PGM

Total Operating EJlpense5

0,00

000

000

0.00

1,250.00

1 250 00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0,00

3,250.00

3.250.00

0.00

0,00

0,00

000

0.00

000

0,00

000

000

000

2,013.62

2.013,62

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1,236,36

i23JWll

100.00 %

100.00 0/0

10000%

10000 %

61.95 %

61.95 %

Total ElCpen5e Accounts 1,250.00 3.250.00 0.00 2,013,62 1,236,38 61.95 %

RevlInue 0,00 2,00000 0,00 2.!,>S828 658,28

ElCpense5 1.25000 3,250,00 0.00 2,013.62 1,236 38

N,t (1,25000) (1,250.00) 0.00 6446(, 1,694.66

USER CORYELL, MYRA PAGE 1 DATE 01 12412012 REPORT GL60YTD1 TJME 150953

HAEIDATE. 15:09:55 0112412012

55

Report: GL80YTD1

Fund 101

Key: 10110110

YIE: DEC

General Fund

Board Office Programs

Macomb County, Michigan Budgel to Actual Report By Org Key

YTO THRU 12/3112011

Fiscal Year:

Fiscal Period:

2011

"

Qb)«I PJ~riptiO!l

Adopted

BUdgel

Final

Budget Encumbered

2011

Actual Variance % Utilized

Total General Fund

Revenue

Exponfies

N.' 0.00

1,250.00

(1.25000)

2,000.00

3,250.00

(1,250,00)

000

000

0.00

2,656.26

2,013.62

644,66

658.28

1,236.38

132,91 %

61,95 %

USER CORYEll, MYRA PAGE,2 DATE, 01124/2012

REPORT GlIjllYTD1 TIME, 15'09:55

rME/DATE 15,09,55 01/2412(1U

56

Documents

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS - Macomb County, …boc.macombgov.org/sites/default/files/content/government/boc/pdfs... · Board of Commissioners ... 216,327 219,327 50,067 69,992 149,335